<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>WiseQuacks</title>
	
	<link>http://wisequacks.org/wp2</link>
	<description>Medical info with humour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Wisequacks" /><feedburner:info uri="wisequacks" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>Wisequacks</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>More Image Problems</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wisequacks/~3/Ct22IsjrlaQ/</link>
		<comments>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1765#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wisequack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1765</guid>
		<description />
			<content:encoded />
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1765</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1765</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Chocolate Healthy?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wisequacks/~3/OV1OfNpnYwE/</link>
		<comments>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1762#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wisequack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question of the Week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Must diets always be given harsh sounding K-type names like PritiKin, AtKins and Kellogg Special KKK? Would diets not be more enticing if they used kinder, gentler soothing sounds such as Nestle, Tootsie Roll and Peppermint Patty? “I’m here to see Dr. Wonka about starting the Hershey diet.” Too busy advising a boring diet of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must diets always be given harsh sounding K-type names like PritiKin,  AtKins and Kellogg Special KKK? Would diets not be more enticing if they  used kinder, gentler soothing sounds such as Nestle, Tootsie Roll and  Peppermint Patty?<br />
“I’m here to see Dr. Wonka about starting the Hershey diet.”<br />
Too busy advising a boring diet of high fibre, low fat, fruits,  vegetables, whole grains, blahblahblah, seldom do we admonish adopting a  diet high in chocolate macaroons, Black Forest cake or Baby Ruths. Well  chocaholics may want to unite behind researchers at the University of  California who are uncovering the positive medical benefits of  chocolate. As it turns out, the cocoa plant is loaded in good old  catechins, polyphenols and certain flavenoids. Not only do these  phytochemicals appear to have an intriguing cardioprotective effect,  they also actually decrease nasty LDL cholesterol. Chocolate has a  positive effect on brain neurotransmitters and can act as a mood  enhancer. Cocoa has also been found to be rich in powerful  cancer-fighting antioxidants. In fact, the prestigious British Medical  Journal printed studies that showed that a few pieces of dark chocolate a  month actually helped to extend life! Hey, sign me up for the study!  Give me a chocolate physical. Heck, transfuse me.<br />
Should chocolate become the newest health treatment, I’d be among  the first to open up a Willie Wonka clinic. We’d be open After Eight as  we Skittle about spreading Mounds of fun and Almond Joy. We’d use Pez  dispensers to take temperatures (oral only). We could fudge the test  results. “Congratulations Sweet Marie, you’re expecting Twix. You’re  going to have a couple of everlasting gobstoppers.” Terminal patients  could eat Death by Chocolate and&#8230; OK, I can tell I’m getting carried  away here as evidenced by the saliva on my keyboard.<br />
(“A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.”&#8230;Willie Wonka)</p>
<p>Though it’s unlikely we’ll ever see Cadbury’s Phenylethylamine bar  on the candy shelf, the names of certain candy bars do in fact remind me  of some of the medications available today. For example:<br />
M&amp;M’s could well stand for Maxeran and Maxalt, in treatment for  migraines. Many migraineurs suffer from debilitating nausea/vomiting,  which often prevents the ingestion of medicine. Maxeran abolishes the  nausea. Maxalt is a wafer that melts in your mouth not in your nauseated  stomach.<br />
Aero – Asthmatics can be severely aero-challenged. Their life is one  of puffers, pills and panicky panting. Now assorted combination aero  discs and puffers have revolutionized asthma treatment. No more multiple  puffers.<br />
Butterfinger- For those who have blood running in their  butterstream, several very effective cholesterol-lowering medications  statins can now decrease the grease.<br />
Godiva Chocolates &#8211; No real medical correlation, but I include it in  hopes that the free advertising in this widely read column will  generate a “thank you” from this very wonderful company with handsome  and generous management.<br />
Mercedes Benz- ditto<br />
Mr. Big, Skor, and Oh Henry! : Got ED? See Alice.</p>
<p>Stay tuned for more exciting results of long term chocolate studies.  Even if “the suspense is terrible&#8230;.I hope it’ll last.” Wonka</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1762</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1762</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Jelly Roll Model</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wisequacks/~3/BEa2CZ996xw/</link>
		<comments>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1759#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wisequack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should we as doctors be healthy role models to our youth? If we aren’t should we lose our jobs? Recently a raft of rather rotund doctors in Austria’s state-run clinics with a BMI (body mass index) over 25 received letters telling them to shape up or they’re fired! Fired for being fat. Fired for being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we as doctors be healthy role models to our youth? If we aren’t  should we lose our jobs? Recently a raft of rather rotund doctors in  Austria’s state-run clinics with a BMI (body mass index) over 25  received letters telling them to shape up or they’re fired! Fired for  being fat. Fired for being a roll model.</p>
<p>One in three kids in North America are overweight while a Big  Whoppering nine million kids are classified as obese. Pediatric obesity  is the greatest health threat facing our children. Some, unfortunately,  are primed to be large as a genetic battle between hormones like ghrelin  and leptin is waged in the internal milieu. But many others, the  corpulent computer-keystered Kripsy Kremed kids, are also developing a  host of co-morbid conditions associated with obesity that up until now  have never been heard of in children. A life sentence of misery  secondary to Type Two diabetes is showing up in younger and younger  kids. More recently NASH (non alcoholic hepatitis), previously a purview  of plump, portly, or puffy parents is now showing up in obese youth and  damaging their livers. 12-year old livers are looking like they’ve been  abused in the Navy (motto: “We Sail Wet”) for 20 years.</p>
<p>A few tips on how to prevent your young ‘un from becoming a big ‘un.</p>
<p>1. Best thing to do for an obese child is to give him a prescription  for a new set of parents. Studies indicate that many parents with obese  kids, especially overweight boys see their child through rose-coloured  glasses and don’t see the “big” problem. “Porky’s not obese, doctor,  he’s just big boned. Now you’ve upset him. There there now, you’re  mommy’s little Piglet, have another Oreo and don’t listen to that  Austrian.”<br />
2. “Breast is best.” Another Navy motto, but also refers to the fact  that the GUTS (Growing Up Today Study) found that children who had been  breastfed were 34% less likely to become obese regardless of how chubby  or diabetic their mother is. Of course if your big baby is twenty seven  years old then perhaps he’s just best left fat.<br />
3. Role model v. roll model. “OK kid go out and do some push ups or  something just leave me alone and keep away from my remote!”  Kids born  to overweight moms are 15 times likely to be obese by age six and in  fact start to pack on the Gerbers by age three.<br />
4. Remove words like “fat”, “exercise” and “diet” and replace with  more fun euphemisms like “play”, “great nutrition” and “kumquat”  (Kumquat has nothing to do with this article I just think it’s a  hilarious word.)<br />
5. Don’t eat in front of TV, in fact get rid of your TV. Go ahead.  In fact, if you have a 52inch LCD then as a caring medical professional  it would be in your best interest for me to remove that from your home.  Trust me. I am only thinking of you, your children and the playoffs.<br />
6. Eat as a family.<br />
7. Eat like the French, Slowly all day lunches with excessive amount  of wine. I believe this works because the diners pass out and don’t  wake up in time to eat supper. Make the meal a marathon not a sprint.  Try to stretch out the meal or you’ll stretch out your Lulu Lemons.<br />
8. Start meals with salad or soup. Stuff ‘em early, stuff em hard! (They won’t be able to wolf down dessert.)<br />
9. Fridge full of healthy snacks like carrot sticks , celery sticks  and Snickers sticks. Obesity comes not only from eating the wrong  things, it also comes from not eating the right things. Undernourished  kids gain weight as they get hungry and end up eating cardboard-like  products.<br />
10. No junk food in the house. Changing eating habits as a child is  easier than treating obesity as an adult. I might add that nowhere on  the Snickers wrapper does it actually refer to itself as a junk food per  se.<br />
11. Be active in promoting active lifestyle options for kids in your community.<br />
12. Let them get their sleep. Leptin, a good guy hormone is released during sleep.<br />
12. Move to Vienna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1759</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1759</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Old People Have No Taste</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wisequacks/~3/4Wt0vLXfqhA/</link>
		<comments>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1755#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wisequack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did You Know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that as we get older we start to lose our taste as witnessed by the tendency to wear checked sweaters and plaid pants &#8230;but we also lose the sensation of taste.  Although we are born with over 9,000 taste buds, as we ripen, the number of these tongue sensors decrease leaving us [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that as we get older we start to lose our taste as witnessed by the tendency to wear checked sweaters and plaid pants &#8230;but we also lose the sensation of taste.  Although we are born with over 9,000 taste buds, as we ripen, the number of these tongue sensors decrease leaving us with less than half that number later in life.  As well, by the age of forty-five, these dwindling buddies also diminish their sensitivity.  This combination results in the inability to distinguish between bitter and salty flavours which explains what went wrong with Granny’s roast beef at Xmas.  The good news is that as we age, we gradually lose all our senses such as hearing, sight, smell, and touch so we don’t really<em> care</em> anymore.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1755</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1755</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>People Who Wear Glasses Are Smarter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wisequacks/~3/UgEiYJ7hEmc/</link>
		<comments>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1752#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wisequack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hits & Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite often when we look at a person wearing glasses we automatically assume that they must be an intelligent individual but are they really smarter?  Researchers in Singapore studied whether there was an association between level of intelligence and the likelihood of being myopic or nearsighted. The results indicated a 4-fold increased risk of needing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite often when we look at a person wearing glasses we automatically assume that they must be an intelligent individual but are they really smarter?  Researchers in Singapore studied whether there was an association between level of intelligence and the likelihood of being myopic or nearsighted. The results indicated a 4-fold increased risk of needing eyeglasses in those people that were enrolled in gifted school programs or who attended post-secondary institutions.  Although you might think this is simply because students are more likely to perform close visual work such as intensive reading and studying which causes eye strain, there does not seem to be a clear correlation with this assumption.  Furthermore, psychologists in Australia tested the theory that people who wear glasses tend to be the top nerds in school&#8230;but this also does not seem to be the case.  This study found no increased link between eyeglass-wearers and personality traits such as introversion and excessive conscientiousness.  In fact, the only personality trait that was seen more in myopic people was actually <em>openness</em> which is often correlated with being more educated because of a wider range of interests.  So, if you like to wear glasses just to look studious, it might not be a smart decision&#8230;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1752</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1752</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Diagnostic Imaging</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wisequacks/~3/QWKDRi8_9hs/</link>
		<comments>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1749#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wisequack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1749</guid>
		<description />
			<content:encoded />
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1749</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1749</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A Real Groiner</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wisequacks/~3/kQQNyGB0rfQ/</link>
		<comments>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1744#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wisequack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are few things I enjoy more than playing hockey. Actually I’m a little deeper than that. I also enjoy watching hockey, table hockey, roller hockey, playing hooky, Stompin Tom, hockey gear, hockey pools and Jello. But I, like many of you, am not as young as I was a year ago. This means I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are few things I enjoy more than playing hockey. Actually I’m a  little deeper than that. I also enjoy watching hockey, table hockey,  roller hockey, playing hooky, Stompin Tom, hockey gear, hockey pools and  Jello. But I, like many of you, am not as young as I was a year ago.  This means I must now resort to wilier tactics such as tripping,  slashing, blaming others and reminding the ref that he may, one day,  find himself lying naked on my examining table. But for a few moments  last week I thought I was 21 again. I accelerated on the ice, like  really, really fast dude. My groin was not happy about this 21-year old  thing. It groaned, whined, roared and then snapped. A few strides later  and I was toast. A groin pull/strain/tear/owwie. Reacting in typical  hockey macho style, I tossed my helmet, broke my stick over Scottie’s  head and lay on the ice making snow angels, or at least half a snow  angel. I writhed and grimaced and clutched myself so dramatically that  soccer scouts started salivating. The next morning I prepared to ooze  out of bed, but my groin was still in the penalty box. Unable to move my  left leg I log-rolled onto my stomach, pivoted about my navel axis,  arched my back and slid off the mattress, backwards, like a confused  walrus. Now as much as the condition of my groin is, no doubt, of great  concern to you, this column is about physiotherapy, not the state of my  groin. (That story will be told in my upcoming book entitled “Dr Dave, A  Real Groiner” soon to be made into a TV docudrama featuring Dr. George  Clooney as myself, with groin stunts and clutches performed by Michael  Jackson and Manchester United.)<br />
Recalling a painful teenage experience with Absorbine Junior and a  previous groin strain, I decided that, instead of self-medicating, I  would visit my local physiotherapist. Physiotherapy is not something  doctors necessarily know a whole lot about. We are the diagnosers, they  are the fixer uppers. If a patient limps into the office, holding a  kneecap in their hands, we diagnose “Sore leg”, prescribe them a drug to  make us feel complete and send them to physio to get fixed up.<br />
As I lay on the physio’s table, Barb (perfect name) marched in  towing an ultrasound machine. Now U/S is an excellent treatment  modality, though I must admit I was a tad leery of anything attached to  an electrical outlet getting that close to my nether regions. But my  groin pain was growing pain so I let the machine do its thing. U/S not  only decreases inflammation but also speeds up healing by allowing the  muscle fibres to properly align. In addition, therapeutic U/S has been  shown to expedite fracture healing. And I was amazed! After a few  minutes I was all but able to throw away my crutches and hop out of the  office, which I did with such glee that I tripped and pulled my groin.  So I returned the next day, wanting to know what other instruments these  physios employ to heal foolishly injured patients. I asked,<br />
ME: “What other instruments do you employ to heal foolishly injured patients?”<br />
Barb: “Well, we have Interferential, an electrical suction cup  device that relieves pain and stimulates muscle, causing it to contract  and relax.<br />
ME: “To be used when?” I gasped as I reflexively guarded my injury with a magazine.<br />
Barb: “When muscles need to be strengthened, such as after a joint,  muscle or bone injury or operation. It can also be used to strengthen  intrinsic back muscles allowing those with back pain to rebalance their  spine. And over here we have a traction device, (pointing to a device  with a pulley, chains, a dial and MORE WIRES CONNECTED TO AN OUTLET!)  commonly known as “the rack”. Assorted back and neck pains can benefit  from traction.”<br />
ME: “Hence the term physioterrorist.”<br />
Barb: “But our greatest tools are these.” she remarked as she  reached into her pocket and pulled out a vicious pair of hands,  conveniently attached to a muscular pair of arms. To make matters worse,  they smelled like&#8230; Absorbine Junior. (For the final outcome of this  groin therapy please see the movie or read Chapter 11 entitled “It’s  Just a Little Limp!”)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1744</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1744</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Are We Nuts?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wisequacks/~3/3T5-oqjvJeQ/</link>
		<comments>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1741#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wisequack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question of the Week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On rare occasions, when I find that my pantry is low on the essential food groups such as Cocoa Puffs, Snickers and Dr.Pepper, I go grocery shopping. Not one to linger too long in the tofu and wheat germ aisle I slink over to the bulk food section, salivating fondly over these massive barrels of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On rare occasions, when I find that my pantry is low on the essential  food groups such as Cocoa Puffs, Snickers and Dr.Pepper, I go grocery  shopping. Not one to linger too long in the tofu and wheat germ aisle I  slink over to the bulk food section, salivating fondly over these  massive barrels of massive calories. When it comes to the cases of nuts,  admittedly, I am a bit of a nutcase. I scoop up a large mixture of  nuts, flick aside the ugly Brazil nuts, flick in a few more cashews and  make for my pantry. But I happen to have two teenage sons/squirrels  nesting in my home. By the time I get around to treating myself I notice  that all of the cashews have mysteriously fallen out of the bag. My  “Keep your hands off my nuts!” command does nothing but garner snickers,  which as I mentioned is one of the more important food groups.  Returning later, the almonds have been selectively extricated and are  gone. Finally the walnuts are freed from the mix, leaving me with  nothing but a bag of filberts and salt. This drives me&#8230;exactly.<br />
Nuts, though unquestionably chockfull of fat, just might be the healthiest snack in your cupboard.</p>
<p>ALMONDS A handful of almonds a day will keep the cardiovascular  surgeon away. The lowering of LDL cholesterol, known as the mother of  all evil cholesterol, is essential for routine heart pump maintenance.  In fact, in those who are at risk of heart disease, the aggressive  lowering of LDL cholesterol is necessary. According to the nutty  professors at Harvard who study these things, a daily handful of almonds  can lower LDL cholesterol enough to reduce cardiovascular disease by a  whopping 20%! In some cases a handful of almonds may be used instead of  cholesterol-lowering medication. Almonds are also rich in folate, a  vitamin important in keeping hearts, fetuses, bone and brain healthy.</p>
<p>CASHEW  Gesundheit.  These luxurious nuts are nothing to sneeze at.  Cashews are rich in selenium, a mineral shown to protect against  prostate cancer. (This being the case my sons should have the healthiest  prostates south of Spitzbergen.) Cashews, like most nuts are best eaten  unsalted and raw while the oil is fresh. Like almonds, these nuts are  loaded in monounsaturated fats, which is good fat. If “good fat” makes  as much sense as “slumber party” or “cat owner,” realize that, like good  cholesterol, unsaturated fat acts biochemically to reduce the risk of  cancers and coronaries.</p>
<p>WALNUTS Rich in omega 3 fatty acids, walnuts are, like fish,  beneficial in lowering cholesterol. They are also rich in arginine, an  amino acid important in the synthesis of nitric oxide, which helps relax  tense blood vessels.</p>
<p>PISTACHIOS. These nuts have been known to cause an unfortunate  disease known in the medical field as Pistachio nail. Wrestling  vigorously to get at a pistachio may cause scrapes under the tender  thumbnail skin, which when further irritated with salt will cause its  victim to insert the injured thumb into the mouth. Sucking vigorously at  the thumb, the victim is often seen simultaneously sifting through the  bag for easier pistachios.</p>
<p>PEANUTS. Peanuts are not your normal nut. In fact, peanuts are no  more a nut than Michael Jackson isn’t. They are legumes. But as we can  salt them, roast them and sell them in the bulk food containers, let’s  consider them nuts. The average child will eat 1500 peanut butter  sandwiches by the time they graduate from high school. This is not  necessarily bad as peanuts are high in fiber, niacin and a powerful  antioxidant called reservatol, the same flavenol that gives red wine its  reputation as a protector of hearts. Same benefit, less hangover.<br />
So as I sit here with my bag of filberts and salt, my  everlasting-prostate sons are fully sated. While a corn doodle or other  empty carb snack leaves the snacker hungry again in 30 minutes, a  handful of nuts satisfies hunger pangs for several hours. Nut snackers  actually eat less, lose weight and have less diabetes. Satisfying, fat,  tasty and highly nut&#8212;-ricious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1741</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1741</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Exercising the Brain</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wisequacks/~3/j9-moVQeDfM/</link>
		<comments>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1739#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wisequack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1739</guid>
		<description />
			<content:encoded />
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1739</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1739</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Could I Get a Personality Disorder</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wisequacks/~3/uRvxFYEaxXY/</link>
		<comments>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1735#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wisequack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question of the Week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Carl,” I comment to the psychiatrist sitting beside me at a medical conference I recently attended (for some odd reason these guys seem to relish sitting by me), “Is it not true that just about everyone could be slotted into one Personality Disorder category or another?” “Sort of. We could all be described as having [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Carl,” I comment to the psychiatrist sitting beside me at a medical  conference I recently attended (for some odd reason these guys seem to  relish sitting by me), “Is it not true that just about everyone could be  slotted into one Personality Disorder category or another?”<br />
“Sort of. We could all be described as having one style of  personality or another, with only the degree of the personality trait  determining if it becomes a disorder. You for example I would classify  as a compulsive personality with&#8230;”<br />
“Why you incompetent Freudian snake oil nincompoo&#8230; ”<br />
“No, this is true of most doctors. But a personality style only  becomes a disorder when it is taken to the extreme. Then it begins to  interfere with day-to-day functioning. But by its very definition, those  with Personality Disorders don’t believe they have a problem. They  think they are OK, it’s everyone around them that notices the problem.”<br />
“Funny, I’ve noticed that my entire office staff, my hockey team and  my family all seem to have problematic Personality Disorders.”<br />
“I see. While 2-3% of the population consistently demonstrate a full  blown Personality Disorder, the rest of us need to be wary that our  particular personality style doesn’t deteriorate down the continuum into  a Personality Disorder. Certain triggers such as an illness,  (particularly neurological illnesses), stress and even some medications  may convert our style or trait into a disorder. For example, someone you  might consider “sensitive” may become ill and slide down that continuum  to develop an Avoidant Personality Disorder. A “conscientious” person  may become an obsessive-compulsive during university exams. While  personality traits are often genetically programmed, a dysfunctional  Personality Disorder may develop permanently in a child who is the  product of chronic moderate neglect or abuse. Once ingrained,  Personality Disorders are notoriously difficult to treat. It is not easy  to treat someone who thinks everyone else is the problem. These people  are able to thwart any attempt at therapy. They are “difficult” people  with disturbed, extreme and rigid views of themselves and the world  about them.”<br />
Want to get the family stirred up tonight? Try gathering the clan  around and determine which personality trait/style each fits into. That  way, when Uncle Archibald goes squirrelly one day while on Demerol after  bowel surgery, you can predict which Personality Disorder you will be  dealing with. To further foment family feuding, grade each player from  1-10 based on how close their trait is to becoming a disorder.</p>
<p>PERSONALITY STYLE DISORDER</p>
<p>vigilant paranoid (unwarranted suspicion, envy, distrust in motives of others)<br />
devoted dependant (submissive and clinging behaviour, fear of separation)<br />
mercurial borderline (very unstable in interpersonal relationships, impulsive)<br />
self confidentnarcissistic (lack of empathy for others, need for admiration)<br />
dramatichistrionic (over reactive, theatrical behaviour and seductiveness, attention seeking, excessively emotional)<br />
aggressiveexplosive (impulse control, temper problems)<br />
adventurousantisocial (disregard for rights of others, sociopathic)<br />
conscientiousobsessive compulsive (excessive concern with conformity, inability to relax easily)<br />
solitaryschizoid (timidness, introversion, social detachment)<br />
leisurelypassive aggressive (negativistism, passive resistance to demands and resposibilities)<br />
sensitiveavoidant (hypersensitive, social inhibition)<br />
self sacrificingself defeating (“If I suffer enough and someone sees it, I’ll be loved”)<br />
idiosyncraticschizotypal (eccentricity of behaviour, discomfort with and reduced capacity for close relationships)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1735</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://wisequacks.org/wp2/?p=1735</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

