WOLVOMAN80

I AM A RACIST, ANTI-SEMITIC PRICK!

2015-01-10T17:40:00.002-08:00

I don't really call myself a truther but I suppose that is what I am, I do not trust the government and media and therefore I look elsewhere for information, sometimes I look on YouTube or most the time bloggers, media and obviously Wikipedia, I am not saying everything on Wikipedia is true but it is a good place to start. I love Wikipedia but some articles are mad, like the other day when I was reading about the Rothchild family. The article tells us that the Rothchild family own banks all over the world and shows us pictures of at least 20 huge mansions that they own all over the world, the article even tells us they some of mansions shown are not the only mansions that they own in the cities that are shown in the article. After the article tells us about this families long history of obscene wealth and greed, the article finishes off with this; Many conspiracy theories about the Rothschild family have been identified as a result of anti-Semitic prejudice reaching back several hundred years, including the era of the Napoleonic wars, and not as a result of valid evidence.

So according to Wikipedia conspiracy theories about the Rothchild family have been identified as being anti-Semitic? The article fails to tell us who identified conspiracy theories about the Rothchild family as anti-Semitc but apparently it as been anti-Semitc since the Napoleonic wars. I am glad Wikipedia cleared that up for me, here I am calling myself a truther when actually I have already been identified as an anti-Semitic, ignorant, racist prick. Well if that is the case I best STFU and stop posting this racist shit. BELOW IS THE WHOLE ARTICLE

"House of Rothschild" redirects here. For the film, see The House of Rothschild. For other uses, see Rothschild (disambiguation).

The Rothschild family
Coat of arms of the Rothschild family
Ethnicity	Ashkenazi Jewish
Current region	Monaco, Luxembourg, France, Austria, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Germany, United Kingdom, United States, Cayman Islands
Place of origin	Free City of Frankfurt, The Holy Roman Empire
Notable members	Mayer Amschel Rothschild Nathan Mayer Rothschild
Distinctions	Barons (European nobility)
Traditions	Goût Rothschild
Name origin and meaning	German for "red shield"

A Rothschild house, Waddesdon Manor in Waddesdon, Buckinghamshire, donated to charity by the family in 1957.

A house formerly belonging to the Viennese branch of the family (Schillersdorf Palace).

Schloss Hinterleiten, one of the many palaces built by the Austrian Rothschild dynasty. Donated to charity by the family in 1905.

Beatrice de Rothschild's villa on theCôte d'Azur, France

Palace of Baron Albert von Rothschild, (photo 1884)

Château de Montvillargenne. A Rothschild family house in Picardy, France.

The Rothschild family is a family descending from Mayer Amschel Rothschild, a court Jew to the German Landgraves of Hesse-Kassel, in the Free City of Frankfurt, who established his banking business in the 1760s.^[1] Unlike most previous court Jews, Rothschild managed to bequeath his wealth, and established an international banking family through his five sons.^[2]

Five lines of the Austrian branch of the family have been elevated to Austrian nobility, being given five hereditary titles of Barons of the Habsburg Empire by Emperor Francis II in 1816. Another line, of the British branch of the family, was elevated by Queen Victoria, who granted two hereditary titles of Baronet (1847) and Baron which ennobled the family (1885).^[3]^{[page needed]}^[4]^{[not in citation given]}

During the 19th century, when it was at its height, the Rothschild family is believed by some to have possessed the largest private fortune in the world, as well as the largest private fortune in modern world history.^[4]^[5]^[6] The family's wealth is believed to have subsequently declined, as it was divided amongst hundreds of descendants.^[7] Today, Rothschildbusinesses are far less well known than they were throughout the 19th century, although they encompass a diverse range of fields, including finance, real estate, mining, energy, mixed farming, wine, and charities.^[8]^[9]

Family overview[edit]

The first member of the family who was known to use the name "Rothschild" was Izaak Elchanan Rothschild, born in 1577. The name means "Red Shield" in German. The family's ascent to international prominence began in 1744, with the birth of Mayer Amschel Rothschild in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. He was the son of Amschel Moses Rothschild, (born circa 1710),^[10] amoney changer who had traded with the Prince of Hesse. Born in the "Judengasse", the ghetto of Frankfurt, Mayer developed a finance house and spread his empire by installing each of his five sons in the five main European financial centres to conduct business. The Rothschild coat of arms contains a clenched fist with five arrows symbolizing the five dynasties established by the five sons of Mayer Rothschild, in a reference to Psalm 127: "Like arrows in the hands of a warrior, so are the children of one's youth." The family motto appears below the shield:Concordia, Integritas, Industria (Unity, Integrity, Industry).^[11]

Paul Johnson writes "[T]he Rothschilds are elusive. There is no book about them that is both revealing and accurate. Libraries of nonsense have been written about them... A woman who planned to write a book entitled Lies about the Rothschilds abandoned it, saying: ‘It was relatively easy to spot the lies, but it proved impossible to find out the truth.’" He writes that, unlike the court Jews of earlier centuries, who had financed and managed European noble houses, but often lost their wealth through violence or expropriation, the new kind of international bank created by the Rothschilds was impervious to local attacks. Their assets were held in financial instruments, circulating through the world as stocks, bonds and debts. Changes made by the Rothschilds allowed them to insulate their property from local violence: "Henceforth their real wealth was beyond the reach of the mob, almost beyond the reach of greedy monarchs."^[12]Johnson argued that their fortune was generated to the greatest extent by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in London; however, more recent research by Niall Ferguson indicates that greater and equal profits also were realised by the other Rothschild dynasties, including James Mayer de Rothschild in Paris, Carl Mayer von Rothschild in Naples and Amschel Mayer Rothschild in Frankfurt.^[13]

Another essential part of Mayer Rothschild's strategy for future success was to keep control of their banks in family hands, allowing them to maintain full secrecy about the size of their fortunes. In about 1906, the Jewish Encyclopedia noted: "The practice initiated by the Rothschilds of having several brothers of a firm establish branches in the different financial centers was followed by other Jewish financiers, like the Bischoffsheims, Pereires, Seligmans, Lazards, and others, and these financiers by their integrity and financial skill obtained credit not alone with their Jewish confrères, but with the banking fraternity in general. By this means Jewish financiers obtained an increasing share of international finance during the middle and last quarter of the nineteenth century. The head of the whole group was the Rothschild family...". It also states: "Of more recent years, non-Jewish financiers have learned the same cosmopolitan method, and, on the whole, the control is now rather less than more in Jewish hands than formerly."^[14]

Mayer Rothschild successfully kept the fortune in the family with carefully arranged marriages, often between first or second cousins (similar to royal intermarriage). By the late 19th century, however, almost all Rothschilds had started to marry outside the family, usually into the aristocracy or other financial dynasties.^[15] His sons were:

Amschel Mayer Rothschild (1773–1855): Frankfurt, died childless, passed to sons of Salomon and Calmann
Salomon Mayer Rothschild (1774–1855): Vienna
Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777–1836): London
Calmann Mayer Rothschild (1788–1855): Naples
Jakob Mayer Rothschild (1792–1868): Paris

The German family name "Rothschild" is pronounced approximately rawt-shilt in German, not roth(s)-chyld as it is in English. The surname "Rothschild" is common in Germany, and the vast majority of the bearers of the name are unrelated to this family. Moreover, the German surnames "Rothschild" and "Rothchild" are not related to the Protestant surname "Rothchilds" from the United Kingdom.

Families by country:

The Napoleonic Wars[edit]

A landmark Rothschild Palace inFrankfurt, Germany, Villa Günthersburg (photographed 1855)

The Rothschilds already possessed a significant fortune before the start of the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), and the family had gained preeminence in the bullion trade by this time.^[16]From London in 1813 to 1815, Nathan Mayer Rothschild was instrumental in almost single-handedly financing the British war effort, organizing the shipment of bullion to the Duke of Wellington's armies across Europe, as well as arranging the payment of British financial subsidies to their continental allies. In 1815 alone, the Rothschilds provided £9.8 million (in 1815 currency, about £566 million, €717 million or US$869 million today, when using the retail price index, and £6.58 billion, €8,34 billion or US$10.1 billion when using average earnings) in subsidy loans to Britain's continental allies.^[17]

One of the smaller city houses, Vienna. A collection of far larger Viennese palaces known as Palais Rothschild were torn down during the Second World War.

The brothers helped coordinate Rothschild activities across the continent, and the family developed a network of agents, shippers, and couriers to transport gold across war-torn Europe. The family network was also to provide Nathan Rothschild time and again with political and financial information ahead of his peers, giving him an advantage in the markets and rendering the house of Rothschild still more invaluable to the British government.

In one instance, the family network enabled Nathan to receive in London the news of Wellington's victory at the Battle of Waterloo a full day ahead of the government's official messengers.^[16] Rothschild's first concern on this occasion was to the potential financial advantage on the market which the knowledge would have given him; he and his courier did not immediately take the news to the government.^[16] It was then repeated in later popular accounts, such as that of Morton.^[18]^[19] The basis for the Rothschild's most famously profitable move was made after the news of British victory had been made public. Nathan Rothschild calculated that the future reduction in government borrowing brought about by the peace would create a bounce in British government bonds after a two-year stabilisation, which would finalise the post-war restructuring of the domestic economy.^[17]^[18]^[19] In what has been described as one of the most audacious moves in financial history, Nathan immediately bought up the government bond market, for what at the time seemed an excessively high price, before waiting two years, then selling the bonds on the crest of a short bounce in the market in 1817 for a 40% profit. Given the sheer power of leverage the Rothschild family had at their disposal, this profit was an enormous sum.^[17]

Nathan Mayer Rothschild initially started his business in Manchester in 1806, and gradually moved it to London, where in 1809 he acquired the location at 2 New Court in St. Swithin's Lane,City of London,^[16] where it operates today; he established N M Rothschild & Sons in 1811. In 1818, he arranged a £5 million (equal to £320 million in 2014) loan to the Prussian government, and the issuing of bonds for government loans formed a mainstay of his bank’s business. He gained a position of such power in the City of London that by 1825–6 he was able to supply enough coin to the Bank of England to enable it to avert a market liquidity crisis.

International high finance[edit]

"I have not the nerve for his operations. They are well-planned, with great cleverness and adroitness in execution – but he is in money and funds what Napoleon was in war." —Baron Baring on Nathan Rothschild^[20]

Mentmore Towers, one of the many Rothschild mansions built inBuckinghamshire

"... your friends at the West End have the business in their hands to decide between Portugal & Brazil and an early intimation from you may serve us materially."—Samuel Phillips & Co to Nathan Rothschild^[21]

The family financed the creation of the country Rhodesia, and it became the site of the first international expansion of one of their mining enterprises—the Rio Tinto mining company.

In 1816, four of the brothers were each elevated to the hereditary nobility by Austrian Emperor Francis I; moreover, a fifth brother, Nathan, was elevated in 1818. All of them were granted the Austrian title of baron or Freiherr on 29 September 1822. As such, some members of the family used "de" or "von" Rothschild to acknowledge the grant of nobility. Barons (Knights) who received their title from the Holy Roman Emperor or, after Holy Roman Empire's 1806 dissolution under Franz/Francis II, from the Austrian and later Austro-Hungarian Emperor are known as "Barons of the [Holy Roman] Empire", Reichsfreiherren, although the title is sometimes shortened to Freiherr.

In 1847, Sir Anthony de Rothschild was made a hereditary baronet of the United Kingdom. In 1885, Nathan Mayer Rothschild II (1840–1915) of the London branch of the family, was granted the hereditary peerage title Baron Rothschild in the Peerage of the United Kingdom.

The Frankfurt terminus of the Taunus railroad, financed by the Rothschilds. Opened in 1840, it was one of Germany's first railroads.

Rothschild family banking businesses pioneered international high finance during the industrialization of Europe and were instrumental in supporting railway systems across the world and in complex government financing for projects such as the Suez Canal. During the 19th century, the family bought up a large proportion of the property in Mayfair, London.

The Rothschild family was directly involved in the Independence of Brazil from Portugal in the early 19th century. Upon an agreement, the Brazilian government should pay a compensation of two million pounds sterling to the Kingdom of Portugal to accept Brazil's independence.^[21] N M Rothschild & Sons was pre-eminent in raising this capital for the government of the newly formed Empire of Brazil on the London market. In 1825, Nathan Rothschild raised £2,000,000, and indeed was probably discreetly involved in the earlier tranche of this loan which raised £1,000,000 in 1824.^[21]^[22] Part of the price of Portuguese recognition of Brazilian independence, secured in 1825, was that Brazil should take over repayment of the principal and interest on a £1,500,000 loan made to the Portuguese government in 1823 by N M Rothschild & Sons.^[21] A correspondence from Samuel Phillips & Co. in 1824 suggests the close involvement of the Rothschilds in the occasion.

Major 19th century businesses founded with Rothschild family capital include:

Alliance Assurance (1824) (now Royal & SunAlliance);
Chemin de Fer du Nord (1845)
The Rio Tinto mining company (1873) (from the 1880s onwards, the Rothschilds had full control of Rio Tinto)^[23]
Eramet (1880)
Imerys (1880)
De Beers (1888)

The family funded Cecil Rhodes in the creation of the African colony of Rhodesia. From the late 1880s onwards, the family took over control of the Rio Tinto mining company.

The Japanese government approached the London and Paris families for funding during the Russo-Japanese War. The London consortium's issue of Japanese war bonds would total £11.5 million (at 1907 currency rates; £1.03 billion in 2012 currency terms).^[24]

The name of Rothschild became synonymous with extravagance and great wealth, and the family was renowned for its art collecting, for its palaces, as well as for its philanthropy. By the end of the century, the family owned, or had built, at the lowest estimates, over 41 palaces, of a scale and luxury perhaps unparalleled even by the richest royal families.^[17] The soon to be British Prime Minister Lloyd George claimed, in 1909, that Lord Nathan Rothschild was the most powerful man in Britain.^[4]^{[not in citation given]}^[25]

In 1901, with no male heir, the Frankfurt House closed its doors after more than a century in business. It was not until 1989 that the family returned, when N M Rothschild & Sons, the British investment arm, plus Bank Rothschild AG, the Swiss branch, set up a representative banking office in Frankfurt.

Niles' Weekly Register, Volume 49 had the following to say about the Rothschilds influence on international high finance in 1836;

"The Rothschilds are the wonders of modern banking ... we see the descendants of Judah, after a persecution of two thousand years, peering above kings, rising higher than emperors, and holding a whole continent in the hollow of their hands. The Rothschilds govern a Christian world. Not a cabinet moves without their advice. They stretch their hand, with equal ease, from Petersburgh to Vienna, from Vienna to Paris, from Paris to London, from London to Washington. Baron Rothschild, the head of the house, is the true king of Judah, the prince of the captivity, the Messiah so long looked for by this extraordinary people. He holds the keys of peace or war, blessing or cursing. ... They are the brokers and counselors of the kings of Europe and of the republican chiefs of America. What more can they desire?"^[26]

English branch[edit]

Main article: Rothschild banking family of England

The Rothschild banking family of England was founded in 1798 by Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777–1836).

French branches[edit]

Main article: Rothschild banking family of France

There are two branches of the family connected to France.

The first was son James Mayer de Rothschild (1792–1868), known as "James", who established de Rothschild Frères in Paris. Following the Napoleonic Wars, he played a major role in financing the construction of railroads and the mining business that helped make France an industrial power. By 1980, the Paris business employed about 2,000 people and had an annual turnover of 26 billion francs (€4,13 billion or $5 billion in the currency rates of 1980).^[27]

But then the Paris business suffered a near death blow in 1982 when the socialist government of François Mitterrand nationalised and renamed it Compagnie Européenne de Banque.^[28] Baron David de Rothschild, then 39, decided to stay and rebuild, creating a new entity Rothschild & Cie Banque with just three employees and €830.000 ($1 million) in capital. Today the Paris operation has 22 partners and accounts for a significant part of the global business.

Ensuing generations of the Paris Rothschild family remained involved in the family business, becoming a major force in international investment banking. The Rothschilds have since led the Thomson Financial League Tables in Investment Banking Merger and Acquisition deals in the UK, France, and Italy.

James Mayer de Rothschild's other son, Edmond James de Rothschild (1845–1934) was very much engaged in philanthropy and the arts, and was a leading proponent of Zionism. His grandson, Baron Edmond Adolphe de Rothschild, founded in 1953 the LCF Rothschild Group, a private bank. Since 1997, Baron Benjamin de Rothschild chairs the group. The group has €100bn of assets in 2008 and owns many wine properties in France (Château Clarke, Château des Laurets), in Australia or in South Africa. In 1961, the 35-year-old Edmond Adolphe de Rothschild purchased the company Club Med, after he had visited a resort and enjoyed his stay.^[29]^[30] His interest in Club Med was sold off by the 1990s. In 1973, he bought out the Bank of California, selling his interests in 1984 before it was sold to Mitsubishi Bank in 1985.

"No kings could afford this! It could only belong to a Rothschild."

— Wilhelm I, Emperor of Germany, on visiting Château de Ferrières.^[31]

The second French branch was founded by Nathaniel de Rothschild (1812–1870). Born in London, he was the fourth child of the founder of the British branch of the family, Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777–1836). In 1850 Nathaniel Rothschild moved to Paris, ostensibly to work with his uncle James Mayer Rothschild. However, in 1853 Nathaniel acquired Château Brane Mouton, a vineyard in Pauillac in the Gironde département. Nathaniel Rothschild renamed the estate Château Mouton Rothschild, and it would become one of the best known labels in the world. In 1868, Nathaniel's uncle, James Mayer de Rothschild, acquired the neighboring Chateau Lafite vineyard.

Château de Ferrières, the largest château of the 19th century, was built in 1854. It is set on a 30 km² (12 sq mi) estate. It was donated to the University of Paris in 1975.
Château de la Muette, a château of Baron Henri James de Rothschild, Paris.
Imerys, one of the French family's major industrial interests, which also include such names as Eramet.

Austrian branch[edit]

Main article: Rothschild banking family of Austria

Grüneburgschlößchen, Frankfurt, 1845, one of the Rothschilds' many German garden-mansions. This particular estate was destroyed in an Allied bombing raid, 1944.

In Vienna, Salomon Mayer Rothschild established a bank in the 1820s and the Austrian family had vast wealth and position.^[32] The crash of 1929 brought problems, and Baron Louis von Rothschild attempted to shore up the Creditanstalt, Austria's largest bank, to prevent its collapse. Nevertheless, during World War II they had to surrender their bank to the Nazis and flee the country. Their Rothschild palaces, a collection of vast palaces in Vienna built and owned by the family, were confiscated, plundered and destroyed by the Nazis. The palaces were famous for their sheer size and for their huge collections of paintings, armour, tapestries and statues (some of which were restored to the Rothschilds by the Austrian government in 1999). All family members escaped the Holocaust, some of them moving to the United States, and returning to Europe only after the war. In 1999, the government of Austria agreed to return to the Rothschild family some 250 art treasures looted by the Nazis and absorbed into state museums after the war.^[33]

Naples branch[edit]

Villa Pignatelli, Naples, with views onto Mount Vesuvius

Main article: Rothschild banking family of Naples

The C M de Rothschild & Figli bank arranged substantial loans to the Papal States and to various Kings of Naples plus the Duchy of Parma and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. However, in the 1830s, Naples followed Spain with a gradual shift away from conventional bond issues that began to affect the bank's growth and profitability. The Unification of Italy in 1861, with the ensuing decline of the Italian aristocracy who had been the Rothschild's primary clients, eventually brought about the closure of their Naples bank, due to declining forecasts for long-term business sustainability. However, in the early 19th century, the Rothschild family of Naples built up close relations with the Vatican Bank, and the association between the family and the Vatican continued into the 20th century. In 1832, when Pope Gregory XVI was seen meeting Carl von Rothschild, observers were shocked that Rothschild was not required to kiss the Pope's feet, as was then required for all other visitors to the Pope, including monarchs.^[34]

“

"Rothschilds ... are the guardians of the papal treasure."

—Encyclopedia Judaica, 1901–1906, Vol. 2, p.497

”

Jewish identity and positions on Zionism[edit]

Jewish solidarity in the family was not homogeneous. Many Rothschilds were supporters of Zionism, while other members of the family opposed the creation of the Jewish state. Lord Victor Rothschild was against granting asylum or help to Jewish refugees during the Holocaust.^[35] In 1917 Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild was the addressee of the Balfour Declaration to the Zionist Federation,^[36] which committed the British government to the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.

After the death of James Jacob de Rothschild in 1868, his eldest son Alphonse Rothschild took over the management of the family bank and was the most active in support for Eretz Israel.^[37] The Rothschild family archives show that during the 1870s the family contributed nearly 500,000 francs per year on behalf of Eastern Jewry to the Alliance Israélite Universelle.^[38] Baron Edmond James de Rothschild, youngest son of James Jacob de Rothschild, was a patron of the first settlement in Palestine at Rishon-LeZion, and bought from Ottoman landlords parts of the land which now makes up present-day Israel. In 1924, he established the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (PICA), which acquired more than 125,000 acres (50,586 ha) of land and set up business ventures.^[39] In Tel Aviv, there is a road, Rothschild Boulevard, named after him as well as various localities throughout Israel which he assisted in founding including Metulla, Zikhron Ya'akov, Rishon Lezion, and Rosh Pina. A park in Boulogne-Billancourt, Paris, the Parc Edmond de Rothschild (Edmond de Rothschild Park), is also named after its founder.^[40] The Rothschilds also played a significant part in the funding of Israel's governmental infrastructure. James A. de Rothschild financed the Knesset building as a gift to the State of Israel^[41] and the Supreme Court of Israel building was donated to Israel by Dorothy de Rothschild.^[42] Outside the President's Chamber is displayed the letter Mrs. Rothschild wrote to the then current Prime Minister Shimon Peres expressing her intention to donate a new building for the Supreme Court.^[43]

Interviewed by Haaretz in 2010, Baron Benjamin Rothschild, a Swiss-based member of the banking family, said that he supported the peace process: "I understand that it is a complicated business, mainly because of the fanatics and extremists – and I am talking about both sides. I think you have fanatics in Israel... In general I am not in contact with politicians. I spoke once with Netanyahu. I met once with an Israeli finance minister, but the less I mingle with politicians the better I feel." On the subject of religious identity, he stated that he held an open-minded attitude: "We do business with all kinds of countries, including Arab countries... My oldest daughter's boyfriend is a Saudi. He is a great guy and if she will want to marry him, she can."^[44]

Modern businesses, investments, and philanthropy[edit]

The family has fully restoredSpencer House, St. James's Park, London

Since the late-19th century, the family has taken a low-key public profile, donating many famous estates, as well as vast quantities of art, to charity, and generally eschewing conspicuous displays of wealth. Today, Rothschild businesses are on a smaller scale than they were throughout the 19th century, although they encompass a diverse range of fields, including: real estate, banking, asset management, financial advice, wine, and charities.^[8]^[9]

The Rothschild Group[edit]

Since 2003, a group of Rothschild banks have been controlled by Rothschild Continuation Holdings, a Swiss-registered holding company (under the chairmanship of Baron David René de Rothschild). Rothschild Continuation Holdings is in turn controlled by Concordia BV, a Dutch-registered master holding company. Concordia BV is managed by Paris Orléans S.A., a French-registered holding company.^[45] Paris Orléans S.A. is ultimately controlled by Rothschild Concordia SAS, a Rothschild's family holding company.^[46] Rothschild & Cie Banque controls Rothschild banking businesses in France and continental Europe, while Rothschilds Continuation Holdings AG controls a number of Rothschild banks elsewhere, including N M Rothschild & Sons in London. Twenty percent of Rothschild Continuation Holdings AG was sold in 2005 to Jardine Strategic, which is a subsidiary of Jardine, Matheson & Co. of Hong Kong. In November 2008, Rabobank Group, the leading investment and private bank in the Netherlands, acquired 7.5% of Rothschild Continuation Holdings AG, and Rabobank and Rothschild entered into a co-operation agreement in the fields of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advisory and equity capital markets advisory in the food and agribusiness sectors.^[47] It was believed that the move was intended to help Rothschild Continuation Holdings AG gain access to a wider capital pool, enlarging its presence in East Asian markets.^[48]

Paris Orléans S.A. is a financial holding company listed on Euronext Paris and controlled by the French and English branch of the Rothschild family. Paris Orléans is the flagship of the Rothschild banking Group and controls the Rothschild Group's banking activities including N M Rothschild & Sons and Rothschild & Cie Banque. It has over 2000 employees. Directors of the company include Eric de Rothschild, Robert de Rothschild, and Count Philippe de Nicolay.^[49]

N M Rothschild & Sons, an English investment bank, does most of its business as an advisor for mergers and acquisitions. In 2004, the investment bank withdrew from the gold market, a commodity the Rothschild bankers had traded in for two centuries.^[35] In 2006, it ranked second in UK M&A with deals totalling $104.9 billion.^[50] In 2006, the bank recorded a pre-tax annual profit of £83.2 million with assets of £5.5 billion.^[51]

"Treat the stock exchange like a cold shower (quick in, quick out)."

- A traditional family maxim.^[52]

Edmond de Rothschild Group[edit]

The Large Mansion at Gunnersbury Park, London

In 1953, one Swiss member of the family, Edmond Adolphe de Rothschild (1926–1997), founded the LCF Rothschild Group (now Edmond de Rothschild Group), based inGeneva, with €100 billion in assets, which today extends to 15 countries across the world. Although this Group is primarily a financial entity, specialising in asset management and private banking, its activities also cover mixed farming, luxury hotels, and yacht racing. Edmond de Rothschild Group's committee is currently being chaired by Benjamin de Rothschild, Baron Edmond's son.

In late 2010, Baron Benjamin Rothschild said that the family had been unaffected by the financial crisis of 2007–2010, due to their conservative business practices: "We came through it well, because our investment managers did not want to put money into crazy things." He added that the Rothschilds were still a small-scale, traditional family business, and took greater care over their clients' investments than American companies, adding: "The client knows we will not speculate with his money".^[44]^[53]

Edmond de Rothschild group includes these companies.

Banque privée Edmond de Rothschild – Swiss private banking firm
Compagnie Financière Edmond de Rothschild – French private bank
La Compagnie Benjamin de Rothschild
Cogifrance – real estate
Compagnie Vinicole Baron Edmond de Rothschild – wine making firm

RIT Capital Partners[edit]

In 1980, Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild resigned from N M Rothschild & Sons and took independent control of Rothschild Investment Trust (now RIT Capital Partners, a British investment trust), which has reported assets of $3.4 billion in 2008.^[54] It is listed on London Stock Exchange. Lord Rothschild is also one of the major investors behind BullionVault, a gold trading platform.^[55]

RIT Capital stores a significant proportion of its assets in the form of physical gold. Other assets include oil and energy-related investments.^[56]

Investment[edit]

In 1991, Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild founded J. Rothschild Assurance Group (now St. James's Place) with Sir Mark Weinberg. It is also listed on London Stock Exchange.^[57]

In 2001, the Rothschild mansion located at 18 Kensington Palace Gardens, London, was on sale for £85 million, at that time (2001) the most expensive residential property ever to go on sale in the world. It was built in marble, at 9,000sq ft, with underground parking for 20 cars.^[58]

In December 2009, Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild invested $200 million of his own money in a North Sea oil company.^[59]

In January 2010, Nathaniel Philip Rothschild bought a substantial share of the Glencore mining and oil company's market capitalization. He is also buying a large share of the aluminium mining company United Company RUSAL.^[60]

During the 19th century, the Rothschilds controlled the Rio Tinto mining corporation, and to this day, Rothschild and Rio Tinto maintain a close business relationship.^[61]

In 2012, RIT Capital Partners announced it is to buy a 37 per cent stake in a Rockefeller family wealth advisory and asset management group. The deal, focusing on asset-management, marks the first time that these two well-known families have collaborated.^[62] Commenting on the deal, David Rockefeller, a current patriarch of Rockefeller family, said: "The connection between our two families remains very strong."^[63]

Wine[edit]

Château Lafite Rothschild, Bordeaux. Alongside Château Mouton Rothschild, it is perhaps the most prestigious of the many Rothschild wine estates

The Rothschild family has been in the winemaking industry for 150 years.^[64] In 1853 Nathaniel de Rothschild purchased Château Brane-Mouton and renamed it Château Mouton Rothschild. In 1868, James Mayer de Rothschild purchased the neighbouring Château Lafite and renamed it Château Lafite Rothschild.

Today, the Rothschild family owns many wine estates: their estates in France include Château Clarke, Château de Malengin, Château Clerc-Milon, Château d'Armailhac, Château Duhart-Milon, Château Lafite Rothschild, Château de Laversine, Château des Laurets, Château L'Évangile, Château Malmaison, Château de Montvillargenne, Château Mouton Rothschild, Château de la Muette, Château Rieussec and Château Rothschild d'Armainvilliers. They also own wine estates across North America, South America, South Africa and Australia.

Especially, Château Mouton Rothschild and Château Lafite Rothschild are classified as Premier Cru Classé—i.e., First Growth, the status referring to a classification of wines from the Bordeaux region of France.

Art and charity[edit]

The family once had one of the largest private art collections in the world, and a significant proportion of the art in the world's public museums are Rothschild donations which were sometimes, in the family tradition of discretion, donated anonymously.^[65]

Hannah Mary Rothschild was appointed in December 2014 as Chair of the Board of the National Gallery of London.^[66]

Cultural references[edit]

The Neo-Gothic Castle de Haar

In the words of the Daily Telegraph: "This multinational banking family is a byword for wealth, power – and discretion... The Rothschild name has become synonymous with money and power to a degree that perhaps no other family has ever matched."^[67]

The Neo-GothicRothschildschloss, Waidhofen

The story of the Rothschild family has been featured in a number of films. The 1934 Hollywood film titled The House of Rothschild, starring George Arlissand Loretta Young, recounted the life of Mayer Amschel Rothschild. Excerpts from this film were incorporated into the Nazi propaganda film Der ewige Jude(The Eternal Jew) without the permission of the copyright holder. Another Nazi film, Die Rothschilds (also called Aktien auf Waterloo), was directed by Erich Waschneck in 1940. A Broadway musical entitled The Rothschilds, covering the history of the family up to 1818, was nominated for a Tony Award in 1971.Nathaniel Mayer ("Natty") Rothschild, 1st Baron Rothschild appears as a minor character in the historical-mystery novel Stone's Fall, by Iain Pears. The Rothschild name is mentioned by Aldous Huxley in his novel Brave New World, among many names of historically affluent persons, scientific innovators, and others. The character, named Morgana Rothschild, played a relatively minor role in the story. The name Rothschild used as a synonym for extreme wealth inspired the song "If I Were a Rich Man", which is based on a song from the Tevye the Dairyman stories, written in the Yiddish as Ven ikh bin Rotshild, meaning "If I were a Rothschild".^{[citation needed]}

In France, the word "Rothschild" was throughout the 19th and 20th centuries a synonym for seemingly endless wealth, neo-Gothic styles, and epicurean glamour.^[68] The family also has lent its name to "le goût Rothschild," a suffocatingly glamorous style of living whose decorative elements include neo-Renaissance palaces, extravagant use of velvet and gilding, vast collections of armour and sculpture, a sense ofVictorian horror vacui, and the highest masterworks of art. Le goût Rothschild has much influenced designers such as Robert Denning, Yves Saint Laurent, Vincent Fourcade, and others.

"Yes, my dear fellow, it all amounts to this: in order to do something first you must be something. We think Dante great, and he had a civilisation of centuries behind him; the House of Rothschild is rich and it has required much more than one generation to attain such wealth. Such things all lie much deeper than one thinks."

—Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, October 1828^[69]

Conspiracy theories[edit]

Over more than two centuries,^[18]^[19] the Rothschild family has frequently been the subject of conspiracy theories.^[70]^[71]^[72] These theories take differing forms, such as claiming that the family controls the world's wealth and financial institutions^[73]^[74] or encouraged or discouraged wars between governments. Discussing this and similar views, the historian Niall Ferguson wrote,

As we have seen, however, wars tended to hit the price of existing bonds by increasing the risk that a debtor state would fail to meet its interest payments in the event of defeat and losses of territory. By the middle of the 19th century, the Rothschilds had evolved from traders into fund managers, carefully tending to their own vast portfolio of government bonds. Now having made their money, they stood to lose more than they gained from conflict. The Rothschilds had decided the outcome of the Napoleonic Wars by putting their financial weight behind Britain. Now they would sit on the sidelines.^[75]

Many conspiracy theories about the Rothschild family have been identified as a result of anti-Semitic prejudice reaching back several hundred years, including the era of the Napoleonic wars, and not as a result of valid evidence.^[76]^[77]^[78]^[79]^[80]

Prominent descendants of Mayer Amschel Rothschild[edit]

Prominent lineal descendants of Mayer Amschel Rothschild include among many others:

This is an incomplete list that may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by expanding it with entries that are reliably sourced.

Emil.F de Rothchild

Baron David René de Rothschild, current French chairman of N M Rothschild & Sons and formerly of De Beers

A Rothschild Villa, in KönigsteinGermany, photographed in 1900

Lord Ferdinand von Rothschild (1839–1898)

Sybil Cholmondeley, Marchioness of Cholmondeley (1894–1989), painted by John Singer Sargent

Halton House, a Rothschild family mansion in Buckinghamshire, England

Baroness Pannonica de Koenigswarter

Lionel de Rothschild, whose colt Sir Bevys won the 1879 Epsom Derby

Vermeer's The Astronomer, donated to charity by the family in 1982.

Palace Nathaniel Rothschild, Vienna

Hôtel Salomon de Rothschild, Paris

Ascott House, donated to charity by the family in 1947.

Exbury House, a Rothschild estate in England.

Hôtel Lambert, Paris

Major Alexander Karet (1905–1976)^[81]^[82]
Princess Agnès de La Tour d'Auvergne-Lauraguais (born 1972)
Adeleheid von Rothschild (1853–1935) x 1877 : Edmond de Rothschild (1845–1934) (see the Paris branch)
Prince Alexandre Louis Philippe Marie Berthier (1883–1918), died fighting in World War I
Albert Salomon von Rothschild (1844–1911), former majority shareholder of Creditanstalt
Alfred Charles de Rothschild (20 July 1842 – 31 January 1918)
Alice Charlotte von Rothschild (1847–1922) close friend of Queen Victoria
Aline Caroline de Rothschild (1865–1909), French socialite
Alice Rothschild (born 1985), a Rothschild and the partner of Zac Goldsmith, after his divorce of Sheherazade Ventura-Bentley^[83]
Alienor Rothschild (born 1997)
Lady Aline Caroline Cholmondeley (born 1916)^{[citation needed]}
Baroness Afdera Franchetti (born c. 1931), a former wife of Henry Fonda, from the noble Italian Jewish Franchetti family
Baroness Alix Hermine Jeannette Schey de Koromla (1911–1982)^[84]
Alphonse James de Rothschild (1827–1905)
Amschel Mayor James Rothschild (1955–1996, Paris), patron of motor racing
Princess Andréa de La Tour d'Auvergne-Lauraguais (born Paris 1972)^{[citation needed]}
Anthony Gustav de Rothschild (1887–1961), horse-breeder
Anthony James de Rothschild (born 1977)
Anselm von Rothschild (1803–1874), Austrian banker
Anselm Alexander Carl de Rothschild (1835–1854)^{[citation needed]}
Sir Anthony de Rothschild, 1st Baronet (1810–1876)
Antoine Armand Odélric Marie Henri de Gramont, 13th Duke of Gramont (born 1951)^[85]
Alain James de Rothschild (1910–1982)^{[citation needed]}
Lady Barbara Marie-Louise Constance Berry (born 1935)
Count Armand de Cossé-Brissac (born 1967)
Miriam Caroline Alexandrine de Rothschild
Lord Charles Robert Archibald Grant
Ariane de Rothschild
Ariella de Rothschild
Arthur de Rothschild (1851–1903)
Benjamin de Rothschild (born 1963, Paris)
Princess Béatrice de Broglie (born 1913)
Béatrice Ephrussi de Rothschild (1864–1934)
Bethsabée de Rothschild (1914–1999)
Carl Mayer von Rothschild (1788–1855)
Cécile Léonie Eugénie Gudule Lucie de Rothschild (1913–1995)
Charlotte de Rothschild
Charlotte Henriette de Rothschild (born 1955), British opera singer
Charlotte von Rothschild(1818–84)
Count Charles-Emmanuel Lannes de Montebello (born 1942)
Charles Rothschild (1877–1923), banker and entomologist
Daniel de Rothschild (born 1994)
David de Rothschild (born 1997)
Constance Flower, 1st Baroness of Battersea (1843–1931)^{[citation needed]}
David Cholmondeley, 7th Marquess of Cholmondeley (born 1960), Lord Great Chamberlain of England
David Mayer de Rothschild (born 1978), billionaire^[86] British adventurer and environmentalist
David René de Rothschild (born 1942)
Diane Cécile Alice Juliette de Rothschild (born 1907)^{[citation needed]}
Edmond Adolphe de Rothschild
Edouard Etienne de Rothschild (born 1957)
Édouard Alphonse James de Rothschild (1868–1949) financier and polo player
Prince Edouard de La Tour d'Auvergne-Lauraguais (born 1949)
Edmond James de Rothschild (1845–1934)
Edmund Leopold de Rothschild (1916–2009)
Elie de Rothschild (1917–2007)
Princess Elisabeth de Broglie (born 1920)
Elisabeth Clarice de Rothschild (born 1952)
Emeric de Rothschild (born 1995)
Emma Rothschild (born 1948)
Eric de Rothschild (born 1962), banker
Esther de Rothschild (born 1979)
Evelina de Rothschild(1839–66)
Evelyn Achille de Rothschild (1886–1917), died fighting for the British army in World War I
Sir Evelyn de Rothschild (born 1931), banker
Francesca Diane de Rothschild (1919–1998), philanthropist
Count Gabriel Antoine Armand (1908–1943), a soldier of the French Resistance.
Gustave Samuel de Rothschild (1829–1911)
Guy de Rothschild (1909–2007)
Ferdinand de Rothschild (born 2002)
Ferdinand James von Rothschild (1839–1898)
Hannah Primrose, Countess of Rosebery née Hannah Rothschild (1851–1890)
Hannah Mary Rothschild (born 1962), documentary filmmaker
Heidi Magdalena de Rothschild (1933), socialite
Helene Cecile Muhlstein de Rothschild (1936–2007) x 1962 : François Nourissier (1927–2011), président de l'Académie Goncourt
Henry Herbert, 7th Earl of Carnarvon (1924–2001)
Henri James de Rothschild (1872–1946), playwright, grandson of Nathaniel de Rothschild
Henry Herbert, 6th Earl of Carnarvon (1898–1987)
Duke Hélie Marie Auguste Jacques Bertrand Philippe (1943), 10th Duke of Noailles
Henriette Rothschild (1791–1866) married Sir Moses Montefiore (1784–1885)
Count Henri de Gramont (1909–1994)^{[citation needed]}
Hugh Cholmondeley, 6th Marquess of Cholmondeley (1919–90), Lord Great Chamberlain of England
Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild (born 1936), investment banker
Jacqueline de Rothschild (1911–2012) x (1) 1930; Robert Calmann-Lévy (1899–1982) puis x (2) 1937; Gregor Piatigorsky (1903–1976)
James Armand de Rothschild (1878–1957)
James Mayer Rothschild (1792–1868)
Joachim Von Rothschild (1929–1998)
Julius de Rothschild (born 1981)
Lady Lavinia Anne Alix de Rothschild, of the Rothschild and Borghese family
Neil Primrose, 7th Earl of Rosebery (born 1929)
Neil James Archibald Primrose (1882–1917), MP, killed fighting in World War I
Nelly Rachel de Rothschild (born 1947)
Baroness Nica de Koenigswarter (née Baroness Pannonica Rothschild) (1913–1988), patron of bebop and jazz writer - often called "The Jazz Baroness"
Baron Léon Lambert (1929–1987), Belgium art collector^[87]
Lamasnipes de Rothschild (1844–1915)
Leopold de Rothschild (1845–1917)
Leopold David de Rothschild (1927–2012)
Leonora de Rothschild (1837–1911)
Lionel Nathan Rothschild (1808–1879)
Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild (1882–1955)
Louis de Rothschild (born 2005)
Countess Magdalene-Sophie von Attems (born 1927)
Maria de Rothschild (1894–1937)
Marie-Hélène de Rothschild (1927–94), French socialite
Maurice de Rothschild (1881–1957)
Mayer Amschel de Rothschild (1818–1874)
Marguerite Corisande Alexandrine Marie de Gramont (1920–1998), later Baroness de Gunzbourg, daughter of the Count de Gramont, Officier of Légion d'honneur and Croix de guerre
Maria Beatrice de Rothschild, granddaughter of the Princess de Marsiconovo
Miriam Louisa Rothschild (1908–2005), famous entomologist and zoologist
Lionel Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild of the United Kingdom (1868–1937)
Nathaniel de Rothschild (1812–1870)
Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777–1836)
Nathan Mayer Rothschild, 1st Baron Rothschild of the United Kingdom (1840–1915)
Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild of the United Kingdom (born 1936)
Nathaniel Robert de Rothschild (1946), French financier
Nathaniel Mayer Victor Rothschild, 3rd Baron Rothschild of the United Kingdom (1910–1990)
Nathaniel Philip Rothschild (born 1971), a co-chairman of Atticus Capital, a £20 billion hedge fund^[88]
Nathaniel Anselm von Rothschild (1836–1905), Austrian socialite
Sir Philip Sassoon, 3rd Baronet (1888–1939), British First Commissioner of Works and Under-Secretary of State for Air
Count Philippe de Nicolay (born 1955), great-grandson of Salomon James de Rothschild, he is a director of the Rothschild group.^[49]
Robert de Rothschild (1880–1946) x 1907 : Gabrielle Beer (1886–1945)
Philippe de Rothschild (1902–1988), vintner, son of Henri James de Rothschild
Philippine de Rothschild (1935–2014), vintner, daughter of Philippe
Jacqueline Rebecca Louise de Rothschild (1911–2012), chess and tennis champion
Harry Primrose, 6th Earl of Rosebery (1882–1974) Earl of Roseberry
Raphael de Rothschild (1976–2000)
Salomon James de Rothschild (1835–1864)
Lady Serena Dunn Rothschild (born 1935)
Countess Sophie von Löwenstein-Scharffeneck (1896–1978)
Lady Sybil Grant (1879–1955), British writer
Sybil Cholmondeley, Marchioness of Cholmondeley (1894–1989)
Valentine Noémi von Springer (1886, d. 1969)
Victoria Katherine Rothschild (born 1953)
Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild, zoologist
Wilhelm Carl von Rothschild
Philippe Michael von Krause
Robert Baron Rothschild (born 1983)
Hannah Rothschild, writer and documentary film-maker (born 1962)

Prominent marriages into the family include, among many others:

This is an incomplete list that may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by expanding it with entries that are reliably sourced.

Maurice Ephrussi (1849–1916), of the Ephrussi banking dynasty^[89]
Ben Goldsmith (born 1980), son of financier James Goldsmith, married Kate Emma Rothschild (born 1982)
Anita Patience Guinness (1957), of the Guinness family, married Amschel Mayor James Rothschild^[90]
Abraham Oppenheim (1804–1878), of the Oppenheim Family, married Charlotte Beyfus (1811–1887)
Aline Caroline de Rothschild (1865–1909) married Sir Edward Sassoon, 2nd Baronet, of Kensington Gore (1856–1912), of the Sassoon family
Carola Warburg Rothschild (1894–1987), philanthropist, born into the Warburg family^[91]
Sara Louise de Rothschild (born 1834), married the Baron Raimondo Franchetti (born 1829)
Baron Eugène de Rothschild (1884–1976) married Countess Cathleen Wolff de Schonborn-Bucheim (1885 - c. 1946)^[92]
Bertha Clara de Rothschild (1862) married Prince Alexandre de Wagram
Bertha Juliet de Rothschild (1870) married Baron Emmanuel Leonino
Lili Jeanette von Goldschimdt-Rothschild (1883–1929), married Baron Philippe Schey de Koromla
Elisabeth Pelletier de Chambure (1902–1945), the only member of the Rothschild family to die in the holocaust.
Antoine Agénor Armand (1879–1962), of the Naples Rothschild lines, married Countess Élaine Greffulhe, daughter of Princess Élisabeth de Caraman-Chimay
Hannah Mayer Rothschild (1815–1864) married Hon. Henry Fitzroy (1807–1859), of the family of the Dukes of Grafton
Edouard Alphonse James de Rothschild (1868–1949) married in 1905 the Baroness Alice Germaine de Halphen (1884–1979)
Count François de Nicolay (1919–1963), of the House of Nicolay, married Marie-Hélène Naila Stephanie Josina van Zuylen van Nyevelt
Marguerite de Rothschild in 1878 married Antoine Alfred Agénor, 11th Duc de Gramont (1851–1921),
Dorothy de Rothschild (1895–1988), on her death she left the largest probated estate in Britain
George Herbert, 5th Earl of Carnarvon married Almina Victoria Maria Alexandra Wombwell, the illegitimate daughter of Alfred de Rothschild
Pauline de Rothschild (1908–1976), fashion designer and translator of Elizabethan poetry
In 1923, James Nathaniel Charles Léopold Rothschild, son of Henri James Nathaniel Charles Rothschild and Mathilde Sophie Henriette de Weisweiller, married Claude du Pont of the Du Pont family.^[93]
Lady Irma Pauahi Wodehouse (1897), of the Wodehouse family^[84]
Prince Louis Philippe Berthier (1836–1911)
Amartya Sen (born 1933), Noble Laureate, Indian economist and philosopher, married Emma Georgina Rothschild of the Rothschild banking family of England.
Jeanne de Rothschild (1908–2003), actress
Nadine de Rothschild (1932–), French actress and author
Princess Sophie de Ligne (born 1957), of the House of Ligne, married Philippe de Nicolay (born 1955), a director of the Rothschild group,^[49] and the great-grandson of Salomon James de Rothschild
Liliane de Rothschild (1916–2003), art collector
David Rene de Rothschild married Princess Olimpia Anna Aldobrandini, of the House of Borghese and the House of Bonaparte.^[84]
Baron Robert Philippe de Rothschild married Nelly Beer, a great-grand-niece of Giacomo Meyerbeer
Richard Francis Roger Yarde-Buller, 4th Baron Churston of Churston Ferrers and Lupton (1910–1991), married Olga Alice Muriel Rothschild
Serena Dunn Rothschild (born 1935), granddaughter of Sir James Hamet Dunn, 1st Baronet
Lynn Forester de Rothschild (born 1954), business woman
Edward Maurice Stonor (1885–1930), son of Francis Stonor, 4th Baron Camoys^{[citation needed]}
Lady Pamela Wellesley Grant (born 1912), great-great-granddaughter of The Duke of Wellington, married Lieutenant Charles Robert Archibald Grant, great-great-grandson of Mayer Amschel de Rothschild
Baroness Rozsika Edle von Wertheimstein^[6]
Baron Etienne van Zuylen van Nyevelt of the House of Van Zuylen van Nyevelt – married Baroness Hélène de Rothschild (1863–1947).^[94]
Baron Sigismund von Springer (1873–1927), married Baroness Valentine Noémi von Rothschild (1886–1969), after whom the asteroid 703 Noëmi is named
In 1943 Baron Elie Robert de Rothschild (1917–2007), married Lady Liliane Elisabeth Victoire Fould-Springer, grand-aunt of actress Helena Bonham Carter^[95]

Coat of arms[edit]

Arms of Rothschild family
	Notes Coat of arms of the Rothschild family Adopted 1822 (awarded by Emperor Francis I of Austria) Crest Crests: 1st, out of a ducal coronet Or a mullet of six points Or between two horns per fess alternately Or and Sable, Sable and Or; 2nd, issuant from a ducal coronet Or an eagle displayed Sable; 3rd, out of a ducal coronet Or three ostrich feathers, the centre one Argent and the exterior ones Azure ^[96] Escutcheon Quarterly: 1st, Or an eagle displayed Sable langued Gules; 2nd, Azure issuing from the sinister flank an arm embowed proper grasping five arrows points downward Argent; 3rd, Azure issuing from the dexter flank an arm embowed proper grasping five arrows points downward Argent; 4th, Or a Lion rampant Gules; over all an escutcheon Gules charged with an oval target with pointed center Argent per bend sinister ^[96] Supporters Dexter: a lion rampant Or Sinister: a unicorn Argent Motto Concordia, Integritas, Industria (Latin for "Unity, Integrity, Diligence")

THE LOWER CLASSES THINK THEY ARE OUR EQUALS! (ALTERNATIVE POINT OF VIEW)

2015-01-09T17:08:00.000-08:00

What is wrong with the poorer classes today? Protesting, Rioting and Complaining seems to be a favourite past time. They moan about the fact that we the establishment, elite, Illuminati what ever you want to call us do not pay taxes, but how had we meant to pay for our mansions, castles and palaces if we paid taxes? They spew hate on the internet but lucky for us our obscenely rich friends that have control of the internet Larry Page, Sergey Brinn and our best friend Mark Zuckerberg prevent these complainers from being heard. These people are anti war, anti corporation and anti globalization but lucky for us our obscenely rich friends that control the media will portray these complainers as dangerous, extremists and terrorists, so even when they are heard people consider them to be mental. Thank our dark lord that we own nearly all media.

The lower classes want more money and better lifestyles but if we spend our time and efforts fighting poverty and funding the NHS, how could we afford to fight wars for oil? Political activists moan about the fact that Google, Amazon, Facebook, Vodafone, Boots, Tesco and many other huge multinational do not pay tax on their massive profits, but why should these multinational corporations pay tax? How would Facebook afford to buy Oculus, Instagram and Whats App if Facebook were to pay a fair amount of tax? Why should these companies pay tax when they have worked and lobbied so hard the create these tax loop holes in the first place?

These working class imbeciles moan about the cost of keeping our glorious monarchy, the class system and the aristocracy, they show no respect to people that are above them in the class system despite the fact that these peasants are usually working class or even on benefits, the cheeky bastards living on tiny hand outs, in tiny damp houses, how dare they criticize their class superiors. The problem with the internet is it allows these political activists, lunatics and extremists to be heard as they expose our so called greed in Africa, lets be honest Africans have no need for natural resources, so we might as well take what we need and they don't need, British and American charities will give them aid, anyway! The internet has also exposed our profitable wars, they are brain washing people with bullshit like equality and respect for human life over profit. I mean respect for human life is all very nice and good but it will not help the economy pick up, provide jobs or cut our deficit. Our friends at the bank have printed us lots of money, we should definitely put aside fighting poverty, saving the NHS, respecting human rights and all the other shit aside for now and concentrate on more important issues, issues like paying the banks back because the longer we take to pay our nearly one and half trillion pound national debt, the more interest we would have to pay back on it, we do not want to upset the Rothchilds, they are far too important to upset and without families like the Rothchilds and without monarchies and no class system, me and my family would not have such comfortable lives in comfortable mansions, that have been in my family since my great great great great great great great granddad and his friends murdered a whole village and claimed the land for themselves!

CENSORSHIP ON FACEBOOK. AGAIN.

2015-01-08T18:01:00.000-08:00

I have 3538 Facebook likes it falls almost daily, despite new likes showing when I click "new likes." My Facebook likes are not the only thing falling on Facebook my reach has plummeted to ridiculous lows. I struggle to reach 20 in half an hour of my 3538 likes on a Facebook post, once upon a time my reach was as high as 100000 people on one post! I am glad that Facebook have noticed my hard work and I hope that they have all watched my videos about them, their disapproval means a lot to me! I am extremely proud, I must be saying something that hits a nerve.

KIDS TV = MIND CONTROL.

2015-01-08T17:22:00.002-08:00

Having children is brilliant but it comes with a terrible downside, that downside is Kids TV! My kids like Ben and Holly's Kingdom and Peppa Pig, as I watch this shit with them (usually doing something on my computer) I can not help but notice thought control. Kings, Queens and princesses are portrayed so positively by children's TV. Ben and Holly's Kingdom is full of ROYAL PROPAGANDA and sometimes so is Peppa Pig. It's not just British Kids TV either, Mickey Mouse Clubhouse is always talking of "Princes and Princesses" and in all these shows they show people bowing down to Royalty. I think that maybe the makers of these Kids TV shows should allow the parents to educate our children on such issues. You might want to teach your children to bow down to parasites and greedy rich people but some people (like me) do not.

I have four kids so I have unwillingly and resentfully watched a lot of Kids TV and Kids Movies and Royalty is nearly always the main theme of a Kids Movie, especially a Walt Disney one. Frozen, Cinderella, Lion King, Bambi, Sleeping Beauty, Bambi, Snow White, the Little Mermaid so many, many more are about royalty. These movies always portray royalty positively and as people for children to look up to and their opponents as evil and greedy, these movies are probably a child's first look at royalty and its a pretty biased look at it. This is done the the name of harmless fun, they claim to be feeding children's imagination but all I see is "conform children, look at the pretty princess and her man, do not question authority children it is not your place and you are not a princess so bow down"

DAVID CAMERON STANDS FOR FREE SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY?

2015-01-08T16:03:00.001-08:00

Watching BBC report the Paris terrorist attack was shocking to me, I know that the attack was terrible, terrorism is always terrible, no matter who causes it and no matter where it is. Terrorism is terrible in France, terrible in Palestine, terrible in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. Barrack Obama claimed the attack was cowardly, was it as cowardly as sending drones?

David Cameron claimed that he stands for freedom of speech, freedom of expression and democracy, really? Because last time I checked David Cameron was fighting for Internet censorship and actually attacking our freedom of speech, he used his speech at the United Nations to attack political activism, political activism that he claims can cause terrorism, he accuses political activists, journalists and anybody that disagrees with him of being an extremist. Last time I checked David Cameron fought for lobbyists, he used corporate propaganda and lies to win an election and still did not win out right.

I am not supporting ISIS (who are by the way funded for and armed by the US, John McCain told me) I am simply pointing out the fact that Obama and David Cameron have caused more war and terror then ISIS. 12 people died in France and BBC news reported it was "probably the worst terrorist attack ever committed in France!" Where as Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan suffer attacks that kill hundreds on a much more regular basis. David Cameron and Barrack Obama who both claim to be against terrorism have not only supported terrorism in Palestine but have also committed terrorism acts in Libya, like Blair and Bush committed terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan. Cameron and Obama are suddenly talking like they are freedom fighters again, fighting a war for our freedom against these evil terrorists that have no respect for Human Rights, despite the fact that they also have no respect for human rights.

Our government will use this attack as an excuse for more power to the police, heightened security and more control. It taken Nigel Farage less than 24 hours to blame the immigrants and immigration policy of France for the attack and people will be outraged by Nigel Farage using this as a way to popularize himself and it is disgraceful, but lets be honest we know that every high ranking politician from the big four political parties are going to attempt to use this attack as either a way for them to push new legislation and laws or another way to pass blame on to immigrants and Muslim people, because that what politics is, politics is a battle for control, money and interference.

A MESSAGE TO FACEBOOK AND MARK ZUCKERBERG.

2015-01-07T17:17:00.000-08:00

Once again I find myself writing about Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, I do not like this subject, I find it boring and I hate wasting my time talking about it, but once again Facebook are irritating me! WOLVOMAN80 is now a business meaning I have to attempt to make a living from blogs and videos, I have had millions of views, I also have thousands of people that follow me on social media like Facebook, yet when I post on Facebook my post reaches about 30 people! Also Facebook have not counted a new like for months, I see new likes when I click the new likes box but the number of new likes counted by Facebook goes down. Why? It is either because Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg do not like people exercising their right to freedom of speech or Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg have been paid to hide certain political pages by somebody that does not like people exercising their right to freedom of speech.

Like I say I find the subject of a little, geeky, weakling that steals ideas and then destroys them and never changes his clothes boring! I have no interest what so ever in Mark Zuckerberg but when his greed affects me and people like me, I do feel the need to tell people that Zuckerberg is a DICK! I wish that I did not have to use his website but unfortunately if I didn't, you probably would not be reading this now. I respect that Mark Zuckerberg, the British government and the super rich do not agree with my political views, I would not expect them to, but instead hiding peoples ideas and opinions why don't they try promoting their own ideas and opinions. Why does Mark Zuckerberg not begin a Facebook page for people that think the way he does, why don't Mark Zuckerberg begin a page showing his support for Israel and Zionism? He could share pictures among other Zionists of their victims and use Facebook to promote the wars that Zuckerberg obviously supports, if he does not support them why does he censor Facebook of criticism of them?

I can honestly say I would not write a single word about this dork if he did not affect what I do, but unfortunately the greed of Zuckerberg and his lack of respect for our rights seriously disturbs me, he reminds me of DR EVIL'S son in Austin Powers, he was a twisted little dork as well. My message to Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg is simple, if my reach falls below a certain level and I feel that Facebook is not following Freedom of speech laws correctly, I can simply use Facebook and my blogs to talk about the fact that Zuckerberg pays media to portray him positively and removes negative articles on his website or the fact that Zuckerberg looks like a ill, smelly breathed, inbreed. Or even the fact that Facebook is used as a world wide spy machine thanks to Zuckerberg. But like I say I would rather talk about more interesting and important subjects without censorship please.

THERE IS SHIT ALL OVER THE RADIO!

2015-01-07T15:49:00.001-08:00

Recently the CD player in my car broke forcing me to listen to the radio "its Okay" I thought I will soon find a decent radio channel that I do not mind listening to, Six months later and I still have not found one! When listening to the radio we spend more time listening to corny advertisements telling us what to buy and corny DJ's telling us how and what to think then we spend listening to music. I do not fully understand radio broadcasting laws in the UK nor do I understand PPL licenses but from what I can see and work out about these laws, it seems to be illegal for radio channels to play decent music!

It also seems to be illegal for radio DJ's not to be corny, irritating idiots. These radio laws and regulations that Ofcom claim are important because "The use of radio continues to expand rapidly. This applies to business, broadcasting and leisure activities. The use of radio is carefully planned to give as high a standard of service as possible. Unauthorized use of radio can cause harmful interference to legitimate users. Safety of life may be put at risk if, for example, the radios used by emergency services suffer interference. The successful running of a business can be affected by radio interference. Listeners can be prevented from enjoying their favourite radio station by interference. This is why Ofcom takes action to prevent interference and why the penalties that may be imposed by the courts for unlawful use of radio can be heavy" are actually destroying quality and choice of the radio. And when Ofcom say "legitimate users" what they actually mean is people that pay, as always everything comes down to money.

Because of the corporations that own the radio channels, the record labels and the TV channels and their greed and obsessive willingness to control the thoughts of the masses by using the huge monopoly they have of mainstream media to spread their messages and to promote low quality pop music, radio plays it over and over and the public rush out and buy it. YouTube began to open the door for new interesting and original music, until greedy corporations recognized the potential in YouTube and on the internet, Google now give huge advantages to corporate music, advantages like priority on Google and Youtube search engines, Google spread new corporate music on the related video section of YouTube videos that are almost completely unrelated. These shit music videos also end up as featured videos on home pages and sometimes links even show up on ads before watching the video that you actually wanted to watch.

Like all mainstream media Radio in the UK is weak, it is unimaginative, full of propaganda and it seriously lacks choice, if you like listening to mind numbing, pop music, DJs talking to people like we are stupid, and adverts that are so lame and full of shit jingles so we walk around either singing business phone numbers or business names then radio is the place to be, if not buy a CD player.

NEW MUSIC IS REALLY SHIT, OR AM I OLD?

2015-01-07T04:07:00.001-08:00

How bad is new music? Is it because I am getting old or is new music horrible? I love all music from every era but now! I like Mozart, Beethoven, Handel, Robert Johnson, Dean Martin, Johnny Cash (all time fave), Pink Floyd, the Beatles, the Eagles, Elvis Presley, Bob Marley, the Prodigy, Nirvana, Guns N Roses (all time fave), Michael Jackson, Green Day, Iron Maiden, Eminem (all time fave), Immortal Technique, Tupac and loads more, but modern day POP music is honestly lame. It is not because I am getting old, is it?

Nicki Minaj? Justin Bieber? Beyonce? Jesse J? Katy Perry? One Direction? Olly Murs? I know lame music has always existed but surely this mainstream shit is the worst music that has been in the recorded history of music. I also know that somewhere among all the mass produced mainstream, corporate shit, like a diamond in the sewage, there must be something good, until I find it I will have to carry on listening to music from better times.

If the music industry is going to destroy your soul, corrupt your child and make a fortune from us all at the same time they should at least use talented people and good music to do so, instead of this bunch of soulless, talent-less shit we have all over the charts, radio and YouTube today.

Who is watching and buying this shit? Have seen the view counts on YouTube? Gangnam Style has over two billion views, how the fuck and why have over two billion people watched that shit? No disrespect to the writers but Gangnam style is horrible, irritating and shit but also genius. I must be making the wrong kind of videos, why make political and mythological documentaries when I can just talk shit over a repetitive beat and have a load of pretty fake looking girls dancing around me? I do not blame PSY for making Gangnam style and I bet PSY are as stunned as anyone of the success and riches that Gangnam style has bought.

Gangnam style is just another example of the masses following ridiculous trends, I wish I thought of it.

DEMONS, GODS, REPTILIANS, GHOSTS DOCUMENTARY BY WOLVOMAN80

2015-01-06T15:51:00.000-08:00

DEMONS, GODS, REPTILIANS, GHOSTS 2015 DOCUMENTARY BY WOLVOMAN80

IF GOD IS REAL WHY DO THE INNOCENT SUFFER?

2015-01-06T15:24:00.002-08:00

I used to be an atheist, I went to a Catholic school and was bought up with "Christian beliefs" and therefore as a child I believed in God and although I knew very little of him I also believed in Jesus Christ, I also believed in the Easter Bunny and Father Christmas. As the years go by we grow up, we find out Santa and almost everything we once believed is a lie, it seems only natural that God, Jesus, the devil is also a lie, they are illogical and if they are illogical they must be false.

As a young man I did not believe in silly stories like the stories told in the bible, to me religion was boarder lining insanity and Christians were strict, obsessed, misguided idiots, the same way as T.V portrays them to be. To me the belief in Heaven and God were desperate attempts for people to make themselves feel better. I believed that religion was a tool used purely to control people, if God is real why does he allow such cruelty and suffering? Why not intervene, help people or give us a sign, I believe in science, life and the news, religion is total nonsense and I believed this for many years.

Then I got the internet! As a child I was honestly not interested in learning at all, computer games and playing football were way more interesting than school, school bored the shit out of me, I found it tedious and repetitive, I did not care for learning until I left school, having left school I became interested in politics, the news, political satire, science and I began to love to learn, either watching documentaries researching material for making videos or reading. As all young people do, I assumed I knew the world, it taken me a while to learn and except that I knew nothing, the internet opened me up to brand new information, information that I first believed was ridiculous, paranoid and funny. However the more I read the more convinced I was that there was actually more truth on the internet written by so called "conspiracy theorists" then all the mainstream media combined times one billion.

When we look at the state of the planet, people living in poverty and pain, it is hard to believe in God, but looking at the state of the planet and recognizing some of the evil that takes place on this planet made me consider the possibility of "the devil" and if the devil is real God is real.

When we look at this planet and see the poverty, pain and suffering and say "this proves that God is not real" maybe it doesn't, maybe it proves that the devil is real! "Why would God allow this suffering" atheists scream, but God does not allow this suffering people do. There is more than enough of everything including food to go around, greed, waste and a lack of interest bought on by lack of financial potential in supplying the world with food causes poverty and poverty causes disease. As the great Tony Benn once said "if we have the money to kill people, we have the money to help people" or something like that. As I got older I began to understand that I don't know anything, this planet has existed for over 5 billion years I have been on it for 34 years, for me to assume "I know God is not real or Jesus is not savoir" based on what I am told would be stupid and the more I look at society the more convinced I am that we need saving and we need forgiveness. We had better hope and prey that Jesus stays true to his word and we are saved because if not, then what? Who will save us? Russell Brand? Mark Dice? Alex Jones? Hahahahaha, you might as well wait for Batman.

BEWARE OF A REVOLUTION.

2015-01-04T16:33:00.000-08:00

Many celebrities and political activists call for a revolution, a complete change of politics. Russell Brand, Matt Damon, Alex Jones and many others insist that mankind needs a revolution to save ourselves and they are right, the truth is mankind do need to change. But people also have to be careful, it is alright for rich people like Alex Jones and Russell Brand to shout for change, a revolution and a new way of politics because if things go wrong they would probably be in their nice cozy mansions while the masses struggle to feed themselves. What could go wrong?

You do not have to be a history buff to know that revolutions usually bring war, poverty and chaos and in too many cases the leaders of the "revolution" are controlled by their own opposition. Before Britain starts demanding a revolution people need to begin to actually learn how politics work, people also need to learn to look beyond the propaganda or the propaganda will control the revolution.

Has capitalism really failed? In my opinion it has not! Capitalism has been exploited. Socialism, Communism, Capitalism, it does not matter which one we choose, they are all doomed to fail when the lower classes are expected to fund the system alone. In my opinion a fair version of capitalism seems to be workable. Fix up all tax loop holes that are funded by lobbying, ban lobbying, tax the rich, the corporations, the banks and make a political parties manifesto mean something by holding the government to the manifesto, make it a contract the elected government are legally obliged to follow.

I recognize the world needs to change and you can call me a paranoid conspiracy theorist if you like but I do not trust some of the "political activists and celebrities" that are calling for change, if the masses follow the wrong leader during a "revolution" we could end up with a system that makes our present system look good.

In my experience people have the ability to recognize that multinational corporations are bad and mainstream media is full of BS but people do not seem to have the ability to stop the media subliminally controlling the way they think and this is especially true when it comes to politics. Politics is almost deliberately boring, long winded, slow, dull and full of professional liars, puppets and ridiculously rich public school boys. These people do not care about the NHS because they can afford insurance and treatment, they do not care about welfare benefits because they and their children will never have to claim benefits. If people want change all they have to do is change themselves, stop buying mainstream media and spend at least some of your day looking at alternative media, stop shopping at Tesco, Amazon, Asda, M and S, Aldi, Primark, Next and all other greedy, tax evading, child labour using corporate brands. Stop paying a fortune to watch lame Walt Disney or Hollywood movies and lame TV shows. Educate your children about politics, modern day slavery, exploitation, imperialism, hierarchies and most important and what some people would find the hardest thing to do, stop allowing mainstream media to control the way that you think.

It is not that I do not want a revolution, all that I am saying is; with more regulation, higher taxation to billionaire businesses and the super rich, a complete ban on lobbying, equal air time for all political parties and corrupt politicians, greedy bankers, exploiting corporations should be treated the same way that all criminals are treated imprisoned or heavily fined. Changes like this would not only raise enough money to pay more towards the NHS and welfare, changes like this would raise more money in taxes to invest in other issues the world has at the moment and instead of corporations being a parasite like burden to mankind, corporations would be actually be helping us. I am seriously beginning to believe that the want us to riot, call for a revolution and accept their solution as the revolution.

I AM A YOUTUBE PARTNER PART 2.

2015-01-03T16:18:00.000-08:00

After a online friend informed me that partners with over 15000 subs can contact YouTube, I decided to contact them regarding the non payment of advertising revenue on my most popular videos. The conversation went like this.

WOLVOMAN80 SENT; An issue of non payment effects nearly every video I have. Google are not allowing me to collect any payment on my most popular videos, I understand that SOME of these videos do contain music that is copyright protected therefore I understand that Google might collect royalties for third parties, but I am still entitled to some payment at the moment Google are paying me at the rate of 0.0000053 cents per view despite ads. Social Blade estimates my top 30 vids have earned £60000. Need payment plz.

YOUTUBE SEND AUTOMATED MESSAGE; Thanks for contacting YouTube! We've received your support request, and a member of our team will respond to you shortly. In the meantime, for additional YouTube Support options, please visithttps://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3545535?hl=en.

Sincerely,

The YouTube Support Team.

YOUTUBE REPLY;

Hello Michael,

Advertising revenue is based on a number of factors and may not be directly correlated to video views. These factors include advertiser bidding, advertising availability and advertiser demand for your videos.

As YouTube continues to welcome more monetized videos into the mix, we want to be as transparent as possible and help you understand that there will be fluctuation in the revenue earned by those videos.

* Advertising is both seasonal and flighted. This means, for example, that the Holiday season (November and December) are times of the year when there is tremendous investment in advertising and January and February tend to be lighter months. We've also noticed that when times are lean, businesses often cut their marketing budgets, and fewer ads are available.

* There are different ad formats that will run on your *watch pages* (we call any page that a video is watched on, a *watch page*) and each of those ad formats carries a different CPM (cost per thousand impressions.) For example, when you see the overlay running on the actual video, that is called the YouTube InVideo ad and advertisers pay a nice hefty CPM for that unit. When there is not an InVideo ad sold, then you will only see the square ad to the right of the video. We call that a 300x250 (the dimensions of the ad) and when you see that, and no InVideo - you can assume that the CPM is much lower.

* Your net revenue is dependent on several things, including which ad format appears, what the advertiser paid, and the amount of times your video was viewed. In addition, the geographic location of your viewers/audience will impact your net revenue. We're steadily expanding the InVideo ad format internationally, and this format generates the most revenue for you.

It will be a little tricky in the beginning to gauge what your payment will be each month. You have to keep in mind that on the other side there has to be an advertiser with interest in advertising on your content and it'll take a little time to build the interest. If you are curious about how we present the opportunities, you can check out www.youtube.com/advertise to see how the Google sales team approaches selling.

Keep creating the content and we'll keep at it from our side.

Sincerely,
Prince

The YouTube Team

WOLVOMAN80 SENT; That does not even come close to helping me.

WOLVOMAN80 SENT; YouTube owe me over £60000 (according to social blade) why are YouTube not allowing me to advertise on videos that I have made? Even worse, they ARE allowing other businesses to advertise and not paying me a penny! HELP.

YOUTUBE REPLY; Please only refer to your YouTube Analytics for estimated earnings report. For more information about this, please visit: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/1714384?hl=en&ref_topic=3029002

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; Last year just before Christmas my stats on YouTube showed that you owed me $13000 only to go down to zero a couple of days later!

I DECIDE TO TRY BEGINNING THE WHOLE PROCEDURE AGAIN, AND START A NEW COMPLAINT, IS SEND; Last year (2013) just before Christmas my stats on YouTube showed that YouTube owed me $13000 only to go down to zero a couple of days later! Nearly 16 million views with ads! How much have YouTube/Google made from my videos?

YOUTUBE SEND AUTOMATED MESSAGE; Thanks for contacting YouTube! We've received your support request, and a member of our team will respond to you shortly. In the meantime, for additional YouTube Support options, please visithttps://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3545535?hl=en.

YOUTUBE REPLY; Hello Mike,

Your original query has been dealt with by the Partner Support team. Please refer back to our previous emails (case # 5-3531000005549), and carefully follow the instructions provided.

Should you have any additional queries regarding this matter, we encourage you to explore the available resources in the YouTube Help Center at: http://support.google.com/youtube/ which contain related articles in a variety of topics.

Sincerely,

The YouTube Team

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; Hello YouTube, NO IT HAS NOT BEEN DEALT WITH.

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; It will be dealt with when I am paid.

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; BTW These conversations are being kept and (maybe) used in a video on YouTube to show/expose how useful/helpful YOUTUBE support team ARE!

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; I am owed at least £50000. And my solicitor has advised me to request a list of YouTube's full earnings from my videos, so I am making that request now. Send me a breakdown please.

I also send YouTube a picture of my videos earning stats, the image clearly shows that YouTube paid me NOTHING for the first two years despite my channel peaking at 30000 views per day. The image also shows that despite millions of views my most viewed videos have paid me nothing, despite ads on every one of them!

YOUTUBE REPLY; Again, your YouTube Analytics shows you estimated earnings.

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; Again, and as illustrated in the image I sent you, your silly and completely inaccurate stats are not counting any profit for any of my top videos. Again last year they showed $13000 only to go back down to zero the next day and again can I have a breakdown of the earnings that YOUTUBE (NOT ME) have made from advertising on my videos please?

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1duTbJzQ8_E This video will explain. I have others if you are still confused. (The link is a video describing how I am being ripped off and profited from by Google.)

Next day WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; Why am I being ignored? Is this how you treat all YouTube partners? Why do Google think they have the right to make thousands and pay me nothing for my work?

3 days later WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; http://wolvoman80.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/i-am-youtube-partner-part-1.html

Have a butchers at that. (The link is a blog about my delightful experience of talking to YouTube)

3 days later WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; Is that all the assistance that you are going to offer me? And do you stand by your conclusion that the video views and the estimated earning are correct?

I am again ignored by my "partners" at YouTube.

SOME OBSERVATIONS BY WOLVOMAN80.

2014-12-30T17:15:00.002-08:00

THE QUEENS SPEECH

Reading the public's reaction in the comments section of the Queen's speech is BRILLIANT, we all know Lizzie is a Lizard and the mainstream media can not cover up the fact that Lizzie the Lizard is about as popular with the average Brit as Ebola is.

PLAYSTATION NETWORK DOWN AGAIN

To all the people that have waited for weeks ready for their new PS4 only to discover that the PlayStation is down, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Carry on waiting! And thank God that your life is comfortable enough for this issue to matter so much because some people have real problems.

FROZEN.

After hearing months of hype about the movie Frozen and hearing how "adults love it as well as children" I finally watched some of it today and to be honest I thought it was a load of over rated, over hyped shit, surely the only adults watching this shit are mentally impaired adults. A talking snow man, lame songs and music, no real story or plot and just sometimes absolute meaningless randomness, grow the fuck up and realize the only thing good about Frozen is the marketing, you simple minded idiots.

SANTA IS A RACIST FAT DRUNK.

If Santa tried losing some weight and staying sober maybe children all over the world would "know it is Christmas" instead of Santa dropping off thousands of pounds of shit to some kids and nothing to more needing kids houses. To me Santa seems like a racist, half soaked drunk, does Santa think that, all rich white children are good or something? Or is he not doing his job properly. In fact, fuck all this talking and no action I am going to capture him and kill him! Sorry folks.

MARK ZUCKERBERG

Lets all use Facebook to tell ZUCKERBERG OUR OPINION OF HIM. Lets turn Facebook into Zuckerbergs MONSTER and allow his monster to eat him and rid the world of him and his corruption, greed and lack of respect for our rights and FREEDOM.

I AM V! NO YOU ARE NOT, YOU ARE A TWAT.

Can people please stop wearing these STUPID V for Vendetta masks, you can't be calling people sheep and criticizing corporate misbehavior while dressed in a costume made by a corporation, promoting a corporate made movie, dressed the same as everyone else!

PAT CONDELL

I bet Pat Condell's racist, hatred videos do not get censored from YouTube, he calls Sweden antisemitic because they recognize Palestine, at the same time he constantly attacks Islam. Watching him on my screen makes me want to punch my monitor, right in his old, arrogant face.

BE SCARED.

Do we need another war? The government want us to be scared of Islam, terrorists, extremists, conspiracy theories and bloggers but the only thing that seems dangerous to me is OUR GOVERNMENT.

DANGEROUS IDEOLOGIES.

David Cameron claims world ideologies by non violent extremists can lead to violence!!!!! Yet British government ideologies lead to the deaths and enslavement of millions of people all over the world. And they ain't finished yet.

BRAVE DAVE WILL SLAY THE BEAST.

David Cameron claims he is going to "hunt down the monsters" responsible for the recent beheading. What he means is that he is going to spend OUR taxes and send OUR troops and watch what follows on the TV in his nice comfortable mansion.

BRITAIN MOVING TOWARDS AN ISLAMIC STATE?

People in Great Britain are always attacking Islam with stupid comments like "they are taking over the country!" To this I say "what are they taking over? Our government? Our media? Our entertainment industry? Our businesses? You must be getting Islam confused with Zionism.

CENSORSHIP OFFENDS ME.

I get offended by this censorship of my opinions, what part of my beliefs make the government believe I am an extremist that should be censored? Is it my anti war, anti greed, anti poverty views or my anti child labour posts or maybe my dangerous view that we should live and let live and there are two sides to every story?

WOLVOMAN80=LUNATIC.

Facebook or the government or somebody that thinks they are important has decided that this Facebook page is run by a lunatic and it is not safe for you to listen to the rants of this lunatic! That's why Facebook have taken the liberty of hiding the posts from this page. Now go back to reading how Muslims and benefit scroungers are taking all of our money.

WOLVOMAN80=BENEFIT SCROUNGER.

I am sometimes accused of being lazy and a benefits scrounger due to me not having a job for 3 years!

My answer to these people is, if I am lazy, how do I get people watching my videos from all over the world? From the Antarctic to Africa, Japan and India. In my laziness I have still managed to have a bigger impact on the world then most hard working, law abiding, conformist citizens, so fuck you and your lame paid jobs!

ICE BUCKET CHALLENGE.

Instead of throwing buckets of ice water over yourselves why don't we throw Hydrofluoric acid instead?

There are children in the world that do not even have access to clean water, what must they think of us when they see lame brained, do gooders doing shit like this? Especially when some of the people doing this lame brained, attention seeking publicity stunt have millions or even billions in the bank.

THANK YOU FREEMANTLE.

Freemantle (the makers of Xfactor and lots of other shit) have released ownership of my video meaning my YouTube channel is fully working again.

WOLVOMAN80 would like to thank Freemantle for removing their disgusting, talent-less, greedy, slimy reptilian, lying, corporate hands off my videos and my YouTube channel. Thanks.

WHO WILL SAVE MANKIND.

2014-12-26T17:16:00.000-08:00

With so much corruption and greed in the world who will mankind turn to? #Russell Brand? Telling us he hates materialism while broadcasting from his mansion in the mega materialistic #Hollywood. #Alex Jones? Ranting away like a possessed nutter. #Mark Dice? A man that claims to hate pop music and the pop culture yet he never stops talking about pop musicians and pop culture, a man that ridicules anyone that does not believe the exact same thing as himself. #UKIP and #Nigel Farage? As Tory than Margret Thatcher, as racist as the BNP and as corrupt as the rest of them.

Many people put their faith in to these people and that is up to them, I do not put faith in to anyone of them, who said, everybody has their price and the more honest the man the higher the price? If that is not already a famous quote I am claiming it! The only man/person/thing that I put any faith in to is Jesus Christ, some people like to ridicule people believing or putting faith in to Jesus, to them people I say this; If you think Nigel Farage, Russell Brand, Alex Jones, Mark Dice have any answers or are even honest and straight enough to trust then lets be honest you might as well believe in Santa. If you believe that David Cameron, Ed Miliband, Nick Clegg or Nigel Farage care one bit about you, you might as well believe in the Easter Bunny.

My point is, if you believe that you are to intelligent to believe in Jesus Christ but you believe that Russell Brand, Alex Jones and others are fighting for you and your rights then please do not ridicule anybody else's beliefs, because to me your beliefs are as silly as anyone's beliefs.

The belief in Jesus Christ and/or God is not scientifically plausible believers in science point out, true to what our limited understanding in science seems to show but how scientifically plausible is it to believe in science when the science is so primitive? Believing in science is good, the trouble is we have quite a limited understanding on science and in science one small bit of information can completely change everything. Also science is now talking of String theory and M theory and these theories if true make some pretty crazy thing plausible.

Trust in God or trust no one at all.

RUSSELL BRAND'S REVOLUTION......

2014-12-21T15:57:00.000-08:00

Russell Brand claims to want a "peoples revolution" instead of making mostly shit Hollywood movies he now spends much of his time and efforts on his YouTube channel, exposing the lies, greed and corruption of the mainstream media, corporations and the worlds government's.

When I watch Russell Brand I agree with most of what he says (nearly all of it) and he is very good at making his point and explaining it simply and accurately, the only trouble for me is, I am not sure that he believes it, unfortunately I believe he is probably a fraud. Why would I say such of a thing about a man that claims to spend most of his time helping people by exposing the greed of our bankers and multinational corporations and the corruption of our media and government? I will start by saying, I have no real proof he is a fraud, just observations.

Observations like Russell Brand has worked for a lot of the corporations and businesses he now attacks, he was bought to us by the corporations. He claims to be against materialism yet he buys an Hollywood mansion, I have never been to Hollywood but I have heard it is quite materialistic. Another observation is YouTube, Google, Facebook and nearly every website I have used has either removed videos of mine, my reach on a post on Facebook has gone from tens of thousands to struggling to reach 100, yet Russell Brand reaches millions of people, my numbers and reach is not even close to what his is, so why do Facebook, YouTube and other websites allow somebody like Russell Brand to spread his message freely but smaller, not mainstream YouTube channel's that have nowhere near the reach as Russell Brand has get taken down and have videos removed all the time? Not only does he have a huge internet following he also shows up on BBC and in our newspapers regularly. Another observation is the 33 tattoo on his arm, 33 is a important Masonic number, I have never been bothered to research why he has the number 33 on his arm because I really don't give that much of a fuck why he has the number 33 on his arm, but if it does represent some Masonic meaning then Russell Brand is best ignored.

Another observation after listening to Russell Brand is he finishes many of his speeches with the suggestion that man kind all over the world should come together as one and discuss and attempt to sort out our problems, do you mean a New World Order coming together as one? And what would happen to the people that didn't want to "come together as one?"

TOO MANY FUCKING IMMIGRANTS!

2014-12-18T17:45:00.000-08:00

Are you sick of seeing foreigners roaming our British Streets? Are you sick of Muslims, Africans and Europeans coming over to our country taking our work and even our benefits? Do you think that the government should began turning people away? Do you think our government should the government stop immigrants claiming benefits to ensure that these foreigners do not think that Britain is "an easy way out or a soft touch." Do you think that immigrants coming over to Britain is causing a decline in the lifestyles of the average Brit? If this is in line with what you think then not only are you wrong you are probably a ignorant idiot.

Instead of reading the hate spreading, fear mongering, racist and biased mainstream media or listening to hate spreading, fear mongering, racist and biased politicians read a history book. Read about the fact that our cozy lives that we live in Britain are built on the exploitation of Africa or try reading about the fact that Britain's thirst for natural resources that exist within these countries and the middle east is the cause of much of the pain, suffering and poor living standards in Africa and the middle east. Read about the fact that Britain and USA were built on the slave trade and they continue to this day to exploit African people for their natural resources.

How can people in Britain claim that we British people should have the right to live here but not foreigners? As for immigrants that are out of work not being paid benefits I find it offensive that any government could even consider it, they are still human beings, they could have kids and still have to eat and drink, no benefits could turn them to crime or exploitation.

Like I said in an earlier post Nigel Farage claims as much on his expenses (not counting wages and other business incomes he may have) just his expenses cost two million pound in one year, that means that Nigel Farage cost the British taxpayer more on his expenses then fifty "benefit scrounging" families would get. Nigel Farage is just one man, the monarchy are handed out huge amounts of tax payers money, their security alone cost over 3 billion pound per year according to some reports.

How can the British people claim immigrants are having a negative affect on our lifestyles when hereditary hierarchies, bankers, corporations and aristocrats are running the country? I have got news for the average British simpleton that seems to struggle to spot the real enemy, gangsters don't work themselves to the ground seven days a week for less than minimum wage and live in council houses nor do they claim benefits or live in council houses. Gangsters live in castles, palaces, mansions and obscene luxury, they use fear tactics and drugs to control and manipulate people, they extort, threaten and thieve, sound familiar?

FREE RADIO REVOLUTION, YOUTUBE CHANNEL TAKEN DOWN!

2014-12-18T17:14:00.000-08:00

This looks like an attack on freedom of speech, I have not seen all the videos on this channel but the videos I had seen seemed about right (David Cameron's UN speech analyzes was BANG ON.) Apparently a video questioning the Sydney cafe siege, I have not seen the video but apparently the video claims that the siege was an hoax!

The video must have hit a nerve as it seems to have led to a complete termination of this man's YouTube channel. I share this because when they attack one person's freedom of speech and expression they attack us all.

MARK ZUCKERBERG AND FACEBOOK.

2014-12-17T16:54:00.000-08:00

Google, YouTube and Greed.

Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook.

AFRICA DOES NOT NEED OUR CHARITY!

2014-12-17T16:00:00.002-08:00

People in the West are sometimes showed disturbing images of children starving to death, with these images we are sometimes told the life story of the child that we are watching starve, if these videos do not disturb and upset you, you are probably not human or you don't have a soul or something. After we watch these videos we are given a quick and easy way to quickly donate to help prevent any more children from going through this kind of suffering. Some people happily donate to these charities, as did I but when you look at the big picture these charities are not working and charity is patronizing to the African people. The people of Africa can look after themselves and cringe worthy charity songs like Band Aid 30 is embarrassing, patronizing and ridiculous. They have people that have hundreds of millions in their bank accounts sing "feed the world" to us?

If the West really wanted to help Africa we could maybe stop stealing their valuable natural resources, not that not stealing from somebody is actually helping them. If we see an old woman crossing the road and we do not grab her handbag and run, did we help them? How do the West exploit Africa?

Africa has a large quantity of natural resources including oil, diamonds, salt, gold, iron, cobalt, uranium, copper, bauxite, silver, petroleum and cocoa beans, it also has woods and tropical fruits. Much of its natural resources are undiscovered or barely harnessed. If Africa have all these natural resources then why are the African people living in poverty? EXPLOITATION.

Nigeria is the continent's biggest oil producer, at least $400bn (£250bn) of oil revenue has been stolen or misspent since independence in 1960, according to estimates by former World Bank vice-president for Africa, Oby Ezekwesili. That is 12 times the country's national budget for 2011. Meanwhile, 90% of people in Nigeria live on less than $2 per day.

Corrupt African governments are not the only exploiter of African people, Britain, USA and some of Europe's economies and wealth are built on the exploitation of Africa!

Kofi Annan, the former UN secretary-general, written a 120-page Africa Progress Report, which he claims shows how the economic benefits of extracting natural resources such as oil and iron often fail to flow through to the local population. In the report he writes"Africa loses twice as much in illicit financial outflows as it receives in international aid," he goes on to write "It is unconscionable that some companies, often supported by dishonest officials, are using unethical tax avoidance, transfer pricing and anonymous company ownership to maximize their profits, while millions of Africans go without adequate nutrition, health and education."

Britain's debt is Africa is HUGE, we owe Africa they do not owe us, the Slave Trade, cotton, sugar, tobacco, diamonds, gold, coal, oil the list is massive, we misguided Britain's are told that Africa would not survive without our charity, this is not true, it is actually the other way round! People in Britain do not depend on Africa to live, we however depend on Africa to live the lifestyles we live. Britain's debt to Africa is Trillions of pounds in money but it is also worse than that.

A RADICAL, CRAZY, EXTREME AND DANGEROUS NEW WAY OF THINKING?

2014-12-16T13:16:00.001-08:00

David Cameron and his sleazy Conservative government along with the mainstream media try to present political activists, conspiracy theorists or anyone that disagrees with them as dangerous, he even claims that they could inspire terrorists to attack and that would make the "conspiracy theorist" a terrorist! Is that true? I suppose a mentally unstable person watching a video that is criticizing the government could make him do something stupid. and regrettable. So what we going to do? Stop all criticism of our government to make sure we don't effect the thoughts of the psychopathic population?

What about a mentally unstable person playing Grand Theft Auto? or watching Breaking Bad, American Horror Story or near enough everything that is on T.V? Listening to gangster rap, Black Metal or the most disturbing out of them all Justin Bieber.

It is a little bit of a ridiculous argument "we are censoring the internet of materiel that exposes our greed, corruption and evilness in case it causes some angry, psychopathic lunatic to hurt people. Why can't they just tell the truth "the information is embarrassing and undermining our authority, it makes us appear to be weak, lame, pathetic, greedy and uncaring, because we are."

They call it extreme but is it really extreme to say instead of taking money from the poor and middle classes and handing it to the rich, lets take money the the upper classes, the elite and the billionaire corporations and look after the poor, the weak and the sick? Is it extreme to ask why our government think it is O.K to murder for oil? Or is it extreme to think murder for oil and slavery for profit are O.K and necessary?

The reason that our government call our views extreme and dangerous is because to the government, the establishment and the corporations our views are dangerous! These "crazy theories and extremist political ideologies" could lead to the establishment losing money, land and respect. These theories and political ideologies are a serous threat to the rich and the greedy, the political elite and billionaire corporations, they are not a serous threat to people that have nothing because people that have nothing have nothing lose.

Today people that want peace are considered to be extremists, fanatics and dangerous where as people that want war are considered intelligent, logical and patriotic.

THE JOBCENTRE HAVE FOUND ME A JOB!

2014-12-15T15:57:00.000-08:00

I love going to the Jobcentre and collecting my £200 per week, I love living in the fear that if the uncaring, judging people at the Jobcentre find half a good reason to stop my money me and my family could be homeless. I love reading the mainstream news calling us scroungers, low life's and scum, when the corporations that own the mainstream media do not even pay tax. I love listening to Nigel Farage and David Cameron as they blame "benefit scroungers and immigrants" for the state of this country when they both claim millions on their expenses. Do you know how many "benefit scrounger families" it would take to even get close to the amount of money these to hypocritical, privileged, rich boys claim in their expenses? Work it out.

I love the fact that when I am gone I will probably not be able to leave my children a house or a load of cash, brainwashed, idiotic, not capable of logical thinking people say shit like "they give you a house, they give you money, money I paid in taxes." They do not give you a house, they allow you to occupy a house, nobody gets given houses, except for the privileged, rich boys that are running the show.

The mainstream media talk as if we like not having the money to do anything, not being able to find a job that actually even comes close to being enough to look after four kids. I was working in the building trade as a self employed plasterer and earning between £100 per day to £150 per day in 2005/2006. Plasterers "I know" today are struggling to get £80 per day and sometimes travelling 100 miles per day to earn less money, why? not because of immigrants or laziness but because of corporate takeovers of building businesses in the UK.

Corporate builders tend to work on a high profit margins where as "old" small when compared with today's building businesses used to work on smaller profit margins but more sales. Lack of government investment in to poor areas has also contributed to the decline in the building trade.

After being Jobless for 4 years and putting my time and efforts in to YouTube, blogging, books, DVDs and the internet, I am owed a decent amount of money from YouTube but unfortunately YouTube won't pay up and my life of being broke and judged "a scrounger" look set to continue, for now.

Never fear, the Jobcentre have come to the rescue and found me a job! According to the Jobcentre I now must spend 35 hours per week looking for a job! "looking for a job is now a job" is how they explained it. I also have to time how long I spend looking for work on the internet and how long "interviews and even phone conversations" take.

WOW, THANKS JOBCENTRE PLUS.

I AM A YOUTUBE PARTNER.. PART 1.

2014-12-14T16:50:00.000-08:00

I am now a part of the YouTube team, an online friend told me once your account gets over 15000 subs we are given a special method of contact to our team leaders, YouTube. They gives loads to read about how valued we are and they call you a partner!

I decide to contact my new team leaders and ask them about payment, after all social blade estimates they owe me up to £60000 and last year YouTube own stats showed they owed me $13000 before clearing and going back down to 0.00! I have already sent two written letters to YouTube's head office only to be ignored, twice, they must mean silent partner, I stay silent and I am a valued partner. CLICK HERE TO SEE SOCIAL BLADE STATS

I am keeping record of all my conversations with these people at YouTube, so far they have explained nothing and ignored a request from me (acting on the advice of a solicitor) for records of how much money YouTube/GOOGLE have made from my videos.

So far my new partners seem to think that I should make the videos and they and their friends should make the money!

I don't want to be a part of you're shitty, censoring, lying, greedy "youtube family" and I don't give a flying fuck if you hate me, my videos or anything else, I just want the money that I am owed and my legal right to freedom of speech and freedom of expression.

So far my partners have answered shortly, unhelpfully and they are now just ignoring my emails. I am going to send my partners a link to this blog and inform them that everything that the email conversation between me and my new partners will be documented on my next blog.

The story so far......

TO VOTE OR NOT TO VOTE.

2014-12-14T15:27:00.001-08:00

I always remember when I was young being told how important voting is and how I am privileged and honoured we are to have the right to vote. People died fighting for our right to vote is drilled in to our heads by the school system and the media. It's true! people did die for our right to vote and for our "freedom" or at least they thought they did.

After spending months tracing my family tree I found numerous family members that died in both wars, I also found out my great grandfather was wounded in world war one, an injury that crippled his arm, so I do understand how hard they fought for us and how lucky we are that we have not had to fight a war like it and how we owe them our respect, gratitude and our freedom.

Since than things have changed and again our freedom is under attack, we have the right to vote but not the right to change things. Political parties in Britain and many parts of the world are moving to the right wing, UKIP and Conservatives are far right and Labour are not far behind them. Nick Clegg as succeeded in destroying the Lib Dems as Tony Blair did Labour. An election in Britain now consists of four parties that are almost identical, why?

Governments and political parties need money to operate, money and more money. Normal people (even well off people) can not afford to pay a MP to act for us or to speak for us, only big businesses have that kind of money, which means governments/political parties need big businesses to fund them so big businesses end up controlling all the political parties with money. The political parties that do not except donations from big businesses or rich individuals end up with nowhere near enough money to even have their opinions heard. Because of this normal people become unrepresented by main stream politicians and even if we did our research and take the time to find an obscure political party in Britain that we do feel represents us and vote for them, nobody else will, 80% will vote for one the big four simply because they seen them on television.

People are busy working or raising a family, they leave politics to the politicians, the politicians make them work harder, the media distract them and "inform" them of the "news" and present the political parties to them, them people will vote one of the big four.

As if donations from businesses/rich individuals and propaganda does not make a big enough farce out of the voting system, there is another huge problem.

When running up to the last election David Cameron did not tell people he was going to attempt to privatize the NHS, political parties make promises they know they can not keep to win votes and then face no consequence when pre election promises/targets are not meet.

These are some of the reasons I have never and probably will never vote.

HORROR OF CHRISTMAS. BY WOLVOMAN80

2014-12-14T14:14:00.000-08:00

Clips taken from Ancient Gods and Demons in the modern world? By WOLVOMAN80. and The Ancient world of Demons, Reptilians, Gods and the Djinn.

ASHAMED, ANNOYED, ASTONISHED, AMAZED ALL AT THE SAME TIME.

2014-12-13T17:29:00.002-08:00

That is how I felt when I watched Russell Brand vs Nigel Farage on immigration. Nigel Farage in my opinion is a disgrace, how can a man that claimed 2 million pound in one year on his expenses have the nerve to suggest that immigrants are responsible for falling living standards in Britain? The "angry" man with the stick turned out to be the brother of a UKIP politician and did you hear Nigel Farage when the woman at the back began shouting at Nigel Farage? "do you see the kind of people you are fighting for" I believe he said or words to that effect, proving he is nothing more than a posh poncey snob as if we didn't already know.

What was and is disturbing to me is the amount of people in Britain that are jumping on the "blame the immigrants" bandwagon. They come to this country for opportunity and a better life for themselves and their families in most cases, some immigrants are not allowed to claim benefits under new laws by our government, they work for LESS than minimum wage in some cases and although in Britain they live in poverty and are treated as an underclass, that "we" are superior too.

Immigrants seem to get a lot more blame then they deserve, when disgustingly rich, money controlled parasite's like Nigel Farage get no blame at all, despite claiming more on his expenses in one year then what fifty immigrant families on benefits would get per year!

Amazingly facts like that don't seem to bother some people as they obviously believe that puppets like Nigel Farage are worth more to these country and contributing more to this country then 50 immigrant families.

Nigel Farage should remember that he himself would not exist if it were not for immigration as one of his great Grand father's was in fact German he migrated to London in the 19th century!

The fact that controlled immigration in the 19th century could have prevented this country of a worrying cancer called Nigel in the present day should not be dwelled on too much because immigration has its positive effects too. Immigrants tend to be hard workers and sometimes they are exploited by the system and their bosses, immigrants are less lightly to sue a company for thousands of pounds because they "fell over" at work or they are being bullied.

Pointing the finger at probably the hardest working people in Britain that are paid the least in Britain simply because they are not English is delusional. Nigel Farage is a dangerous man and I can not believe a man that takes as much as he takes from the system could possibly have the nerve and audacity to blame immigrants for Briatin's poor living standards and proclaim himself so high and mighty above certain members of the audience as Nigel Farage did, slimy as they come.

WOLVOMAN80

I AM A RACIST, ANTI-SEMITIC PRICK!

Contents

Family overview[edit]

The Napoleonic Wars[edit]

International high finance[edit]

English branch[edit]

French branches[edit]

Austrian branch[edit]

Naples branch[edit]

Jewish identity and positions on Zionism[edit]

Modern businesses, investments, and philanthropy[edit]

The Rothschild Group[edit]

Edmond de Rothschild Group[edit]

RIT Capital Partners[edit]

Investment[edit]

Wine[edit]

Art and charity[edit]

Cultural references[edit]

Conspiracy theories[edit]

Prominent descendants of Mayer Amschel Rothschild[edit]

Coat of arms[edit]

THE LOWER CLASSES THINK THEY ARE OUR EQUALS! (ALTERNATIVE POINT OF VIEW)

CENSORSHIP ON FACEBOOK. AGAIN.

KIDS TV = MIND CONTROL.

DAVID CAMERON STANDS FOR FREE SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY?

A MESSAGE TO FACEBOOK AND MARK ZUCKERBERG.

THERE IS SHIT ALL OVER THE RADIO!

NEW MUSIC IS REALLY SHIT, OR AM I OLD?

DEMONS, GODS, REPTILIANS, GHOSTS DOCUMENTARY BY WOLVOMAN80

DEMONS, GODS, REPTILIANS, GHOSTS 2015 DOCUMENTARY BY WOLVOMAN80

DEMONS, GODS, REPTILIANS, GHOSTS 2015 DOCUMENTARY BY WOLVOMAN80

IF GOD IS REAL WHY DO THE INNOCENT SUFFER?

BEWARE OF A REVOLUTION.

I AM A YOUTUBE PARTNER PART 2.

SOME OBSERVATIONS BY WOLVOMAN80.

WHO WILL SAVE MANKIND.

RUSSELL BRAND'S REVOLUTION......

TOO MANY FUCKING IMMIGRANTS!

FREE RADIO REVOLUTION, YOUTUBE CHANNEL TAKEN DOWN!

MARK ZUCKERBERG AND FACEBOOK.

AFRICA DOES NOT NEED OUR CHARITY!

A RADICAL, CRAZY, EXTREME AND DANGEROUS NEW WAY OF THINKING?

THE JOBCENTRE HAVE FOUND ME A JOB!

I AM A YOUTUBE PARTNER.. PART 1.

TO VOTE OR NOT TO VOTE.

HORROR OF CHRISTMAS. BY WOLVOMAN80

ASHAMED, ANNOYED, ASTONISHED, AMAZED ALL AT THE SAME TIME.