<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190</id><updated>2009-11-05T06:48:29.261-06:00</updated><title type="text">WoodfordTaxFacts.org - The Truth Detector</title><subtitle type="html">Concerned Citizens of Woodford County Illinois (and others) sharing political thoughts and opinions</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>360</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Woodfordtaxfactscom-TheTruthDetector" type="application/atom+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-998724734135039670</id><published>2009-11-05T06:42:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-05T06:48:29.269-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethanol" /><title type="text">What Ever Happened To Ethanol?</title><summary type="text">Ahh, ethanol boom - we hardly knew ya.</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/998724734135039670/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=998724734135039670&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/998724734135039670" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/998724734135039670" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/11/what-ever-happened-to-ethanol.html" title="What Ever Happened To Ethanol?" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SvLJfzpNIxI/AAAAAAAAsWA/tzuFV0ZzrTE/s72-c/ethanol_corncob.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-3731352799903888135</id><published>2009-10-03T09:36:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-10-03T09:44:08.561-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="&quot;Political Correctness&quot;" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text">If I Die . . .</title><summary type="text">(Former Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas encourages a return to the faith of his father's generation. He believes spiritual values, not material ones, can guide America through troubling times:)During moments of sadness or frustration, I often think of a family scene years ago in the town of Yakima, Washington. I was about seven or eight years old at the time. Father had died a few years </summary><link rel="related" href="http://thisibelieve.org/essay/16507/" title="If I Die . . ." /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/3731352799903888135/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=3731352799903888135&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/3731352799903888135" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/3731352799903888135" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/10/if-i-die.html" title="If I Die . . ." /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/Ssdi0nkCIvI/AAAAAAAArMs/LkQFpmDfxrg/s72-c/1950s-douglasw-16507-200.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-6176965562558370395</id><published>2009-07-23T13:00:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2009-07-23T13:09:36.773-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Demographics" /><title type="text">Health Costs In One's Final Year</title><summary type="text">During the course of the debate on television last night after President's O'Bama's "news conference"  a pundit mentioned something interesting. He said, statistically, fully one fourth of an American's total health care costs occur in the final year of life.Can anyone confirm this?If true, it takes no genius to see where "cost cutting" will occur when generational warfare breaks out over this </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/6176965562558370395/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=6176965562558370395&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/6176965562558370395" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/6176965562558370395" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/07/health-costs-in-ones-final-year.html" title="Health Costs In One's Final Year" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/Smim_rTyvSI/AAAAAAAAqQA/yo_KEIIF-ls/s72-c/images.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-4649738392239568589</id><published>2009-07-09T06:13:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-07-09T06:16:31.959-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text">"You're Nuts"</title><summary type="text">Quote: "When you innovate, you've got to be  prepared for everyone telling you you're nuts." — Larry Ellison</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/4649738392239568589/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=4649738392239568589&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/4649738392239568589" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/4649738392239568589" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/07/youre-nuts.html" title="&quot;You're Nuts&quot;" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SlXRZVOETWI/AAAAAAAApns/HjjqYai1-ic/s72-c/larry-ellison.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-5448994030675182743</id><published>2009-07-02T05:23:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-07-02T05:29:11.122-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Tax Payer Tech" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Spending" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="&quot;Political Correctness&quot;" /><title type="text">Federal Income Tax on Non-Profits?</title><summary type="text">The nonprofit industry includes over 1 million organizations across the US with combined annual revenue of more than $1 trillions. Major organizations include Goodwill Industries, Ascension Health, National Cancer Institute, New York  University, and the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. The industry is highly fragmented: large organizations with assets of $10 millions or more represent just 6 </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/5448994030675182743/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=5448994030675182743&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/5448994030675182743" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/5448994030675182743" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/07/federal-income-tax-on-non-profits.html" title="Federal Income Tax on Non-Profits?" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SkyL6kToA-I/AAAAAAAAo44/r45T06Qjb3s/s72-c/nonprofit-profit-jerseys-web.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-8518314886233091239</id><published>2009-05-31T19:16:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-05-31T19:27:16.704-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sales Tax" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><title type="text">Here Come The Services Taxes</title><summary type="text">Illinois currently doesn’t apply the sales tax on services such a movie rentals, carpet cleaning, dog grooming and a number of other such services. That could change under a budget-balancing plan being considered by the Senate. If approved the 6.25 percent state sales tax would be applied to the following, for which there’s currently no sales tax: Warehousing and storageTravel agent </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/8518314886233091239/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=8518314886233091239&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/8518314886233091239" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/8518314886233091239" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/05/here-come-services-taxes.html" title="Here Come The Services Taxes" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SiMen63JyRI/AAAAAAAAl-Q/i6sJbcZYTzM/s72-c/images.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-3596301670264452266</id><published>2009-05-29T07:18:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-05-29T07:21:03.048-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text">The Numbers Speak For Themselves .  .</title><summary type="text" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/3596301670264452266/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=3596301670264452266&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/3596301670264452266" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/3596301670264452266" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/05/numbers-speak-for-themselves.html" title="The Numbers Speak For Themselves .  ." /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/Sh_S9BPUTkI/AAAAAAAAlkI/FGapygpkzS0/s72-c/mar-secure-download.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-8409693192377103473</id><published>2009-05-22T10:00:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-05-22T10:09:53.278-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text">Political Circuses</title><summary type="text">Edward R. Murrowfrom Quotes of the Day "When the politicians complain that TV turns the proceedings into a circus, it should be made clear that the circus was already there, and that TV has merely demonstrated that not all the performers are well trained."</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/8409693192377103473/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=8409693192377103473&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/8409693192377103473" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/8409693192377103473" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/05/political-circuses.html" title="Political Circuses" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/Sha_mFsS9aI/AAAAAAAAleo/4vQXkM4ExX0/s72-c/pb.politicalcircus.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-761862537194524728</id><published>2009-05-17T18:25:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-05-17T18:34:53.946-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Spending" /><title type="text">Hold On To Your Hat . . .</title><summary type="text">This is just plain scary:</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/761862537194524728/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=761862537194524728&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/761862537194524728" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/761862537194524728" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/05/hold-on-to-your-hat.html" title="Hold On To Your Hat . . ." /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/ShCdw3xGxWI/AAAAAAAAlA0/Cd5hnOoKn6M/s72-c/entitlements_07-580-499x430.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-2009392818726961179</id><published>2009-05-07T07:18:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-05-07T07:22:51.603-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Election Politics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Spending" /><title type="text">Stimulus Spending vs. Overall Government Spending</title><summary type="text">Federal, State and Local Government agencies along with public educational institutions award thousands of contracts in any given month. In February 2009 alone, there were over 65,000 purchases and projects in motion across the United States. The billions of dollars in stimulus spending is supplemental to existing budgets and will be spread over time.he chart below compares February 2009 spending</summary><link rel="related" href="http://recovery.org/Data_and_Graphs.aspx" title="Stimulus Spending vs. Overall Government Spending" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/2009392818726961179/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=2009392818726961179&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/2009392818726961179" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/2009392818726961179" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/05/stimulus-spending-vs-overall-government.html" title="Stimulus Spending vs. Overall Government Spending" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SgLR6NNEDNI/AAAAAAAAkbs/euWMmaVR1N0/s72-c/map.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-6188306658744769990</id><published>2009-05-05T16:18:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-05-05T16:46:59.762-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Election Politics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Spending" /><title type="text">Chicago Style Politics Versus The Rule of Law</title><summary type="text">Finem Respice has a great post on the Administration’s bare-knuckle tactics in trying to enforce its will (against the dictates of bankruptcy law) on Chrysler: It should be obvious to most observers that, recent allegations of strong-arm tactics in negotiations with Chrysler creditors notwithstanding, given the current situation the White House shouldn’t need to resort to anything so openly </summary><link rel="related" href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/05/chicago-style-politics-chrysler-and-the-rule-of-law.html" title="Chicago Style Politics Versus The Rule of Law" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/6188306658744769990/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=6188306658744769990&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/6188306658744769990" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/6188306658744769990" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/05/finem-respice-has-great-post-on.html" title="Chicago Style Politics Versus The Rule of Law" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SgCtzlbUnEI/AAAAAAAAkLA/V72Bw9BmaT0/s72-c/Bare%2BKnuckles.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-2776059831815284915</id><published>2009-04-29T08:59:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-29T09:10:25.384-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="&quot;Political Correctness&quot;" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text">Saudi royal: "you can't get rid of oil . . ."</title><summary type="text">document.write('');               A key member of the Saudi royal family who headed the country's intelligence service for 25 years accused both the Obama and Bush administrations Monday of "deceiving" the American people that the U.S. can ever end its dependence on foreign oil. "You can't get rid of oil. You can't get rid of fossil fuels — gas and coal — unless you want to price yourself out of </summary><link rel="related" href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/27/saudi-ex-envoy-us-cant-be-energy-independent/" title="Saudi royal: &quot;you can't get rid of oil . . .&quot;" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/2776059831815284915/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=2776059831815284915&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/2776059831815284915" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/2776059831815284915" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/04/saudi-royal-you-cant-get-rid-of-oil.html" title="Saudi royal: &quot;you can't get rid of oil . . .&quot;" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SfhfKJKSu4I/AAAAAAAAjXQ/j24KGLE-ylI/s72-c/al-faisal.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-1881449513422833657</id><published>2009-04-28T09:00:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-28T09:04:35.543-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Election Politics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text" /><summary type="text">The nonpartisan research group Center for Media and Public Affairs along with California's Chapman University released a study that found the nightly newscasts devoted 27 hours, 44 minutes to Pres. Obama's presidency in his first 50 days. That compares to 7 hours, 42 minutes for Pres. George W. Bush and 15 hours, 2 minutes for Pres. Bill Clinton during the first 50 days of their first terms.  Not</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/1881449513422833657/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=1881449513422833657&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/1881449513422833657" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/1881449513422833657" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/04/nonpartisan-research-group-center-for.html" title="" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SfcM1T4hQ1I/AAAAAAAAjU0/5canbKiR6W8/s72-c/Obama_4.27.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-4977364774529451789</id><published>2009-04-27T15:42:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-27T15:46:51.858-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><title type="text">Lloyd Webber: "Exodus Is Inevitable"</title><summary type="text">The opinion polls have uttered. The country loves the new 50 per cent top rate of income tax. Soak the rich. Smash the bankers. So Government spin doctors are in second heaven. The Conservatives' silence redefines a tomb. And I suppose there'd be quite a turnout for the public flogging of Sir Fred the Shred. But before you book your tickets, hold hard. And before you lynch me as a rich b*****d </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/4977364774529451789/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=4977364774529451789&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/4977364774529451789" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/4977364774529451789" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/04/lloyd-webber-exodus-is-inevitable.html" title="Lloyd Webber: &quot;Exodus Is Inevitable&quot;" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SfYZn2Z3RGI/AAAAAAAAjQg/3gqOeLi7XMU/s72-c/webber.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-4522475054273861579</id><published>2009-04-21T17:10:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-21T17:16:26.523-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Education" /><title type="text">The True Cause Of College-Tuition Inflation?</title><summary type="text">By Stephen J. Dubner   &lt;!-- Summary --&gt;      &lt;!-- The Content --&gt;       For college students and their parents, the steady spike in tuition prices in recent decades has been not only troubling but mysterious: why on earth is tuition inflation double the general inflation rate? What’s behind these huge tuition bills: Massive legacy costs? Less public funding? The cost of acquiring real estate? </summary><link rel="related" href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/the-true-cause-of-college-tuition-inflation/" title="The True Cause Of College-Tuition Inflation?" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/4522475054273861579/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=4522475054273861579&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/4522475054273861579" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/4522475054273861579" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/04/true-cause-of-college-tuition-inflation.html" title="The True Cause Of College-Tuition Inflation?" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/Se5FqqCTEcI/AAAAAAAAhfM/-Ak9fG6D7Mw/s72-c/images.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-7325758200578639726</id><published>2009-04-21T13:07:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-21T13:13:11.861-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Education" /><title type="text">Let Those That Have (education) Ears, Hear . . .</title><summary type="text">"According to this Deseret News article, University classrooms will be obsolete by 2020. BYU professor David Wiley envisions a world where students listen to lectures on iPods, and those lectures are also available online to everyone anywhere for free. Course materials are shared between universities, science labs are virtual, and digital textbooks are free. He says, 'Higher education doesn't </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/7325758200578639726/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=7325758200578639726&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/7325758200578639726" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/7325758200578639726" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/04/let-those-that-have-education-ears-hear.html" title="Let Those That Have (education) Ears, Hear . . ." /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/Se4MpQ4WCaI/AAAAAAAAhfE/fHLg_4HkMog/s72-c/images.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-3118872480624992147</id><published>2009-04-18T09:07:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T09:12:01.253-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Election Politics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Spending" /><title type="text">Why The Folks Are Angry.</title><summary type="text" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/3118872480624992147/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=3118872480624992147&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/3118872480624992147" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/3118872480624992147" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/04/why-folks-are-angry.html" title="Why The Folks Are Angry." /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SenfMmJ3smI/AAAAAAAAhTI/H_t3Lwc-bgg/s72-c/deficit-poster2-500x400.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-391172263423288338</id><published>2009-03-26T14:08:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-03-26T14:11:56.850-05:00</updated><title type="text">Is The U.S.A. The Next Zimbabwe?</title><summary type="text" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/391172263423288338/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=391172263423288338&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/391172263423288338" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/391172263423288338" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/03/is-usa-next-zimbabwe.html" title="Is The U.S.A. The Next Zimbabwe?" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/ScvTFJyGbpI/AAAAAAAAgbc/ydTxQc-0vpg/s72-c/Zimbabwe-One-Hundred-Tril-001.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-4890063133632803052</id><published>2009-03-05T03:38:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-03-05T03:42:22.045-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Transparency In Government" /><title type="text">Coming (trust us) To A County Near You</title><summary type="text">
&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                     MicrosoftInternetExplorer4                                                   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/4890063133632803052/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=4890063133632803052&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/4890063133632803052" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/4890063133632803052" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/03/coming-trust-us-to-county-near-you.html" title="Coming (trust us) To A County Near You" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/Sa-eUF_w5gI/AAAAAAAAgDk/ea0EASsr3-s/s72-c/Transparency+of+Medical+Prices.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-7785035111572208543</id><published>2009-03-01T07:45:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-03-01T15:58:09.429-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Election Politics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text">Conservative Call To Arms</title><summary type="text">Love him or hate him, Rush Limbaugh's CPAC (Conservative Political Action Committee) speech given yesterday must be shared with all you know who truly "get it". Here is the transcript:RUSH:  Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you all very, very much. Thank you all. I can't tell you how wonderful that makes me feel. It happens everywhere I go, but it's still special here. [ Laughter ] If you all </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/7785035111572208543/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=7785035111572208543&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/7785035111572208543" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/7785035111572208543" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/03/conservative-call-to-arms.html" title="Conservative Call To Arms" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-5588626055964743392</id><published>2009-02-28T08:46:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-02-28T09:22:11.831-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text">The Rich?</title><summary type="text">If the Obama administration and the Dems in Congress want to soak "the rich" a bit more why is the bracket they're targeting "individuals making over $200,00 and couples making over $250,000"? It would seem a bit more consistent to make it individuals at $200k and couples at $400k, wouldn't it?What's the deal with the marriage penalty here?</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/5588626055964743392/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=5588626055964743392&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/5588626055964743392" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/5588626055964743392" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/02/rich.html" title="The Rich?" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SalWkDPcaNI/AAAAAAAAf2s/LCyvs41t3qs/s72-c/rman3989l.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-4780127153640295256</id><published>2009-02-24T10:28:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-02-24T10:34:10.159-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text">Constitutional Right To Arm Bears</title><summary type="text" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/4780127153640295256/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=4780127153640295256&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/4780127153640295256" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/4780127153640295256" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/02/constitutional-right-to-arm-bears.html" title="Constitutional Right To Arm Bears" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SaQgxu_lmPI/AAAAAAAAeQc/yftjT68G1O8/s72-c/four-bears-extended-large.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-1241834788060498020</id><published>2009-02-20T18:53:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-02-20T18:59:37.488-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Transparency In Government" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text">You Can Fool Some Of The People . . .</title><summary type="text" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/1241834788060498020/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=1241834788060498020&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/1241834788060498020" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/1241834788060498020" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/02/you-can-fool-some-of-people.html" title="You Can Fool Some Of The People . . ." /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SZ9RwbRP3CI/AAAAAAAAeP0/Qh4-K2LnA60/s72-c/weseewhatyoudidtherefeb.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-7511460876399201933</id><published>2009-02-18T10:45:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T10:48:42.517-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Election Politics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Off Topic" /><title type="text">Countrary To Current American Trends . . .</title><summary type="text">To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.        -Thomas Jefferson</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/7511460876399201933/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=7511460876399201933&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/7511460876399201933" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/7511460876399201933" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/02/countrary-to-current-american-trends.html" title="Countrary To Current American Trends . . ." /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SZw7vOyL1pI/AAAAAAAAePY/5EXFkZBTNXg/s72-c/TJ+2+436X500.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22858190.post-7613619651132034644</id><published>2009-02-14T12:39:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-02-14T12:49:32.266-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Demographics" /><title type="text">Fed Obligations Exceed WORLD GDP!</title><summary type="text">Anyone worried YET?By Jerome R. Corsi&lt;!--- copywrite only show on NON commentary pages as per joseph meeting 8/23/06 ------&gt;   &lt;!-- copyright --&gt; © 2009 WorldNetDaily &lt;!-- end copyright --&gt;       &lt;!-- begin bodytext --&gt; As the Obama administration pushes through Congress its $800 billion deficit-spending economic stimulus plan, the American public is largely unaware that the true deficit of the </summary><link rel="related" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=88851" title="Fed Obligations Exceed WORLD GDP!" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/feeds/7613619651132034644/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22858190&amp;postID=7613619651132034644&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/7613619651132034644" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22858190/posts/default/7613619651132034644" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://woodfordtaxfacts.blogspot.com/2009/02/fed-obligations-exceed-world-gdp.html" title="Fed Obligations Exceed WORLD GDP!" /><author><name>Contributors</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09653269112897624345" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9sDDa0uPeL0/SZcR_EsTIjI/AAAAAAAAeG0/GPWxp9CMa1k/s72-c/deficit.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry></feed>
