writing it out

The Hero's Luck

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:53:00 +0000

(shamelessly stolen from The Writer's Almanac)

The Hero's Luck

When something bad happens
we play it back in our minds,
looking for a place to step in
and change things. We should go outside
right now, you might have said. Or:
Let's not drive anywhere today.

The sea rises, the mountain collapses.
A car swerves toward the crowd
you've just led your family into.
We all look for reasons. Luck
isn't the word you want to hear.
What happened had to,

or it didn't. Maybe
the exceptional man can change direction
in midair, thread the needle's eye,
and come out whole. But even the hero
who stands up to chance has to feel
how far the world will bend

until it breaks him. He can see
that day: the unappeasable ocean,
the cascades of stone. A crowd
gathers around his body. He sees that too.
someone is saying: His luck just ran out.
It happens to us all.

If You Can't Find the Book You're Looking for...

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:31:00 +0000

...then you must be here.

(Sorry in advance, but I thought it was funny! Also: courtesy of my father-in-law, so blame him :)

Revision 911!

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:55:00 +0000

Tomorrow, I'm jet-setting to nearby Charlotte for the SCBWI-Carolinas workshop Revision 911, led by the awesomely amazing Cynthea Liu!

Here's the workshop description:

In this intensive 4-hour workshop, author and writing coach Cynthea Liu shows you how to revise your ailing work into submission-shape! You will learn how to quickly identify issues with voice, setting, plot, and character through real-life examples, and Cynthea will share smart revision techniques to heal manuscripts as painlessly as possible. She'll also point out symptoms most people casually push aside that shouldn't be ignored.

My question for you:
Do you have any questions you'd like me to ask at the workshop? Ask here, and I'll try to ask tomorrow!!

Different Kinds of Manuscripts

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:57:00 +0000

As I sip on my Skinny Snowman Latte (with an extra shot of espresso), wondering whether I should get started on my new manuscript or play on the interwebs and fritter away my day, I find myself thinking of how there are different kinds of manuscripts out there.

The One You Love: This is the manuscript that you love, and maybe your mother loves, but that's about it. You can't sell it, it has a stack of rejections, and even when you try to workshop it, people's eyes glaze over and they nod politely and say things like, "Oh, it's very...er, creative." And although you love it, you can't bear (or can't see how) to change it. "Revisions" mean adding a scene or changing a few words, or fixing grammar--never deleting, rearranging, or doing significant changes. When you submit it--and you will, and you'll submit it to early--it will be rejected, and you will be shocked--shocked!--that anyone could possibly put it down.
The One You Hate: For whatever reason, this one isn't good enough. Maybe it's a drawer novel that you've recognized as drawer novel and can't stand it, maybe a critiquer wrote nasty things about it, maybe the rejections beat you down, maybe you just edited it to death. Whatever the reason, you hate it. You probably will never get to the point where you edit it again, and it will probably never see the light again...if you haven't already deleted it.
The One You Love to Hate: This one is written with blood, sweat, and tears. As you wrote it, it was the one you loved....as you revised it, it was the one you hated. Now that you've both written and revised it, it's the one you love to hate--you love what it is, but you hate what it isn't. You know it's not perfect--nothing ever can be--but it's as perfect as you can make it...now. This is the one you submit with professionalism, by which I mean, you select specific agents you think will like it, consider their comments if they reject it, and submit again without cycling into rage/depression. You know if--when--it gets accepted, you'll have to edit it again, and you don't dread the idea...you kinda sorta look forward to it.

As I start submitting one manuscript and begin working on another, I realize that, for the first time ever, I've got a manuscript that I love to hate. It makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside--my reaction to it somehow makes me think it's a worthier manuscript than others I've done before.

So, where are you with your manuscripts? Do you think there's another category out there I'm skipping?

Hump-Day Linkspam!

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:37:00 +0000

Holy crap, guys. I've got a *ton* of links in my feed reader and Twitter for you all...but these are the most pressing ones, the ones that have me keeping tabs open in Firefox for you.

First, Stephen King. This gets a big shiny gold star from me for how he says teaching can be like a brain suck. Also: he threw away Carrie. I'm sure you've heard the story before, but it's still cool.

I found these questions that you should ask a copy editor before hiring him quite intriguing. It also confirmed that, although I am a self-professed grammar queen, I am perhaps not suitable to be employed as a copy editor. I certainly don't have a favorite dictionary.

Book sales. They suck. Except for, yanno, kid lit. Which kinda rocks for me and everyone else writing kid lit. But I liked this article because it filled me with spiteful glee (as, personally, I think it would be better for publishers to invest more cash in debut authors than slapping down too many bills for a sophomore novel):

Other big titles showed mixed results. “Her Fearful Symmetry,” the second novel by Ms. Niffenegger, author of the best-selling “Time Traveler’s Wife,” sold just 23,000 copies in its first week, according to BookScan. Publishing insiders suggested that was a disappointment given that Scribner, the unit of Simon & Schuster that published the book, paid Ms. Niffenegger close to $5 million for it.

Lastly: I won this in a Twitter contest. How cool is that? Will update you all on it's usefulness, if you'd like.

Art as Inspiration, part 2

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:03:00 +0000

Part 1 is here, where I talked about my favorite painting.

Art has a profound influence on my life...occasionally. By that, I mean that I don't think about art all the time, and I certainly don't know enough nor have the talent to even attempt (visual) art. But I do appreciate it, and I do seek it out.

And sometimes, seeing visual art inspires my own literary art.

Recently, I was indulging in my lately online guilty pleasure: Historical Tweets. On the site, they make fake tweets from people in history. For example, here's Marie Antoinette, tweeting about cake:

HAHAHAHA!!!! Oh, Marie Antionette, you and your shenanigans.
(Side note: Don't know why the image is appearing skewed...sorry, Marie.)

OK, so when I saw this, first I laughed, then I hungered for cake, then I noticed the picture in the background. I mean, it's pretty intense. Marie's scowl could harm small children, or at least make them cry...and check out the brunette she's staring at.

There's a story there.

I searched for the pic online, but actually had quite a difficult time placing it. Eventually, I found this:

Looking at this image, I can almost see a story. Who is the brunette? What connection does she have with Marie? They are sharing a moment so deeply personal that even the bedraggled beggars fade into the background...and, speaking of, why is that one woman, so clearly on the side of the beggars, also so clearly not a beggar? She's clean, well dressed, and beautiful.

A story spun from my mind when I saw this image. Of Marie Antionette as a young girl, befriending another young girl. Of innocence...and innocence lost as, eventually, the girls stood on opposite sides.

In my search for more info, I also came across this image:

It's titled, Arrest of Louis XVI and His Family. And look...you eye goes immediately to the brunette and Marie Antionette.

These seem to be different brunettes, but my imagination can cast them as the same woman. It makes me even more curious about their story, their connection. As an amateur art historian, I'm curious about the history here, and about how two separate artists were motivated to create images were the focus in this disparate time was on a locked gaze between two very different women.

But as I writer, I sort of love the mystery here, and itch to write their story myself.

So, has any art work inspired your own writing? Do you "fill in the blanks" with your own stories?

On Time

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:51:00 +0000

Last week, I came across this blog article by Miss Snark's First Victim, Authoress. And while I love the MSFV and Authoress herself, I have to admit that I had some immediate, gut-wrenching feelings of bitterness when I read this:

Suffice it to say that the main thing that keeps my writing going is an almost religious adherence to my Daily Writing Time.

1:30 to 4:00. That's my weekly time-of-day during which nothing else is demanded of me. I have no commitments or obligations, no pre-scheduled poop. And I refuse to make appointments or have meetings during this time.

Monday through Friday, 1:30 to 4:00, you'll find me with Beatrice [her computer]. Don't bother me.

Now don't think I don't still love MSFV (I do!), but my first reaction to reading this was a combination of bitterness and jealousy.

I don't have a Daily Writing Time.

I would *love* to have a Daily Writing Time, but I'm more likely to grow a third arm.

And I admit that I, like Authoress, sometimes feel less of a writer when I don't write daily.

But...let me show you my schedule last week (the week where, ironically, the only blog post I could post was a short one on how I had no time):

Monday:

5:30-6:10am: Wake up, get dressed, etc., etc.
6:10-7:00am: Drive to school, while eating breakfast in the car and thinking of lesson plans
7:00-8:00am: Arrive at school, finish lesson plans, copy work, prepare for class
8:00-3:30: School, which included:

Comforting a student who broke up with her boyfriend and the world has now ended omfg
Doing three complete lesson plans, made from scratch, comparing the poetry of the Chinese T'ang Dynasty and Japanese Heian period, complete with graphics, power-points, interactive features, and student work
Lead the yearbook class in developing the school's yearbook
Conferenced with another teacher on method of essay writing
ET CETERA

Around 4:30-5:00: Arrive home
5:00-6:30: Cook, wash dishes, talk with husband, try to be human
6:30-8:00: Various sundry activities, including calling my mother who thinks I'm dead if I don't call once a week, washing the dog who thinks life isn't complete unless he rolls in mud, changing the sheets (again) after the muddy dog decides he can clean himself (on the bed), keeping up with friends who I love but live all across the country

Tuesday:

All the same activities as Monday, but add to that a 1 hour Creative Writing Club meeting with a group of students across the school--which includes reading their work, counseling them on writing, and preparing questions to ask the author who was visiting that week via Skype

Wednesday:

Repeat Monday, but add in:

SIX FREAKING HOURS OF GRADING STUDENT WORK SO THEY CAN HAVE THEIR STINKING REPORT CARDS ON TIME.
Yes, you read that right: six hours. From about 6:30-12:30, I sat in my chair and graded.

Thursday:

Repeat Monday, but add in a husband who was late from his own college class, and me, who was so exhausted from Wednesday that I just collapsed into bed

Friday:

Do you sense a pattern yet?

So, it's Saturday now (I'm scheduling this to post on Monday).

Now, take a glance at my schedule. Can you tell how jealous I am of *anyone* who has a Daily Writing Time?

And it's all nice and good to say, "If you really wanted it, you'd do it." But...it's. Not. That. Easy.

What am I supposed to sacrifice? The day job? That pays the bills. Dinner with my husband, who I already neglect? A clean house?

Well, in truth, I do already sacrifice those things. The husband bought dinner one of those nights, and I let the dishes go a few days. And in that, I gained myself about 3 hours of writing this week.

Three hours.

Authoress does that a day.

Hell yes, I'm jealous.

But then, when I see things like this, I'm no longer jealous--I'm also mad. Do you know the number one thing, according to that list, that's a "nasty" habit of writers?

1. Not Keeping A Regular Schedule
Somewhere along the line, you’ve either fallen out of your previous writing schedule, or you never had one to begin with. Very bad, indeed.

If you have a 9-5 job, schedule an hour of writing (or more) each day, either early in the morning or later at night. For those of you under few time constraints, use that to your advantage. Try to schedule several hours of writing at the most convenient time for you.
Most of all, once you have a routine, stick to it as much as possible.

*bangs head on wall*

So...I should wake up at 4:30am? Or I should stay up until 2 (and then wake up 3 1/2 hours later) to get that writing in...?

Very early on, I had to come to terms with the fact that I didn't have a regular writing schedule...and I never would. And here's the kicker:

That is OK.

Really. It's fine that I don't have a writing schedule. I might not be able to write every single flipping day, but that doesn't make me less of a writer. Because when I do get a break--a holiday, or a long weekend, or the ever-longed-for summer break...well, then I can write for hours and hours and hours at a time. It doesn't matter that I write every day. In all honesty, if I wrote every day, I'd write crap. During the workweek, I'm too focused on teaching in the morning and too burnt-out in the evening. I know. I've tried. I actually have done the wake up at 4:30am, or stay up until 2am before. And what I wrote was drivel.

Here's the thing:

We all write differently.

I write best when I write in huge chunks. I think it's because time *is* so precious to me--when I can set aside a day for writing, I really write--I focus 100%, and can crank out 5,000+ words in one sitting...and they're better than if I had done them a thousand words a day.

A four hour block works for Authoress. A strict schedule works for the author of the list of "8 Nasty Habits You Should Quit to Fuel Your Writing." And writing in flurries whenever I can snatch some time works for me. Whatever way *you* write, don't ever think it's wrong--as long as you're writing, you're a writer. A block of time in your day planner doesn't make you a writer--it's the words you can put on the page, whenever you do actually get them there.

(And, PS, the same goes for NaNo, whether you're participating or not. Which, for the record, I'm not.)

Oh, the Irony

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:20:00 +0000

I was going to write this super-cool awesome post about making time for writing.

But....er....

I don't have the time to write it now.

The Winners Are....

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:20:00 +0000

The winners for PJ Hoover's books are....

....drumroll please....

Heather Zundel

and

Natalie Aguirre!

Both of them won off their "extra" entries...so, it just goes to prove how worth it is to go the extra mile!

Winners, please email me your snail mail addresses and we'll get those prizes sent to you ASAP! :) My email is bethrevis (at) gmail.com.

Winner Announced Soon...

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:50:00 +0000

This weekend was unexpectedly short--I swear, someone came by and stole a whole day and a half of it!! I will draw winners for the two books by PJ this afternoon, after work, I promise!

Stories Through Music

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:45:00 +0000

Dude. Dude. Have you heard of Michael Franti? He's a musician. Not the kind preteens scream at, or the kind women with husbands think about in ways they shouldn't--but he's the kind of musician that I wish lived nearby, so we could hang out and talk, and, failing that, the kind that I could just shake his hand and say thank you for the music.

I first heard of Michael Franti with his most recent, most popular piece, "Say Hey (I Love You)." It's fun and energetic and fills my soul with joy. And I can't possibly put the smile the song gives me into words, so instead, here's the music video:

Now, this is a writing blog, not a music one, but no worries: I actually do have a writing point to make with it.

See, this song--it's not about the words. It's about the feeling. Yes, the words are catchy, easy to remember, and easier to sing to. But the thing that made this song so special isn't the words that make the lyrics--it's the feeling I'm left with afterwards. And that feeling is joy. This song just makes me happy.

Part of it is the realism. This isn't a happy, punch drunk peppy love song--there's some grit to it, a tiny, tiny undertone of how the world isn't made perfect by love (although it is made better). The ghetto--such an innocuously sung word that is only briefly mentioned--is a part of the song, and a part of the music video.

And while we're on the subject of setting--part of the setting is not two perfect young adults in love--it has fat people, skinny people, ugly and pretty people. And children. And families. And the whole village. Love isn't Bella and Edward (or, for you Twihards, love isn't just Bella and Edward) and this song strives to show that it's love--all forms of love--that make this world a better place.

But that's what good writing is about--*not* the perfect ending, but the way life is made better. A real love story doesn't end with happily ever after, just a kiss and a smile and hope.

In writing, it's not so much the words you write, but the impression you leave with the reader. In this song, through the tone and the setting and yes, the words, I am left with an impression of happiness, and a feeling that even if the world isn't perfect, it's not too bad and we can all be happy, especially with love.

Michael Franti is a genius at this--at creating the impression that sticks with the reader. Consider this song:

Now the impression is reversed. In the first song, the overall impression is joyous--in this one, it's much sadder. Through setting (did you notice the garbage pile he sang in front of?), through subtle messages (like the writing on the children's hands), and through the actual tone of the song, you get the impression of sorrow. That the world is a sorrowful place despite the joy, not a joyous place despite the sorrow.

Two entirely different songs--two entirely different impressions. But the point is, when we write, what we need to do is create that impression with the reader. Make him feel--through setting, tone, words, and messages, stir him to emotion, and you're greatest job as a writer is done.

YOUR Interview with Author PJ Hoover--Questions Answered!

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:47:00 +0000

Great questions, everyone! As you were all posting your quessies for PJ, I found myself time and again wondering what the answers would be.

Well, wait no further! Here you go:

From Tricia:
1) I should think a name like that would open doors to ancient research libraries. How far did you go, how deep did you delve to learn about Lemuria and teleporting?

One word. Wikipedia. Sadly, I never figured out how to teleport, so web research was it for this trilogy. I did try telepathy on a number of occasions, and I swear a few times it actually worked. The nice thing about basing the location (Lemuria) off a real mythological place is that there are lots of theories on it out there!

2) What is the most interesting thing you ever dug up? Your choice: library(virtual or otherwise) or ground (like real dirt).

I love treasure collecting, especially in the woods of Pennsylvania. Antique bricks are my latest fascination, and I found a ton this past summer near an old coal mine off in the woods. Fun. Fun. Fun!

From Kat:
And a question, because I'm always interested in this: Did you get your agent via querying? If so, what was the query process like for you?

I met my agent at the Big Sur Writing Conference in California. It's put on by the Andrea Brown Literary Agency twice a year. I went out there with my first twenty pages in hand and within the week, I'd signed with Laura Rennert.

Natalie Aguirre asked:
What does P.J. recommend that aspiring authors who don't have a blog do to have a web presence and how can we best use facebook when we're not published?

In my opinion, before the book is written, the most important thing is writing the book. That said, once it is written, a web presence is nice for a number of reason. 1) You can get a ton of information by reading blogs by industry professionals. 2) You can learn about new agents and editors by staying up to date with sites like Verla Kay. 3) It's nice for an agent to be able to google you and find something professional out there. But it's not a requirement. 4) Building a network is huge. When you do get published, your biggest supporters will be those you've been networking for years with.
But first and foremost, write a great book. Once it's accepted, there is lots of time to get the web stuff going.

A question from me (Beth):
And I would like to ask something, too! I noticed on Tabitha's interview, you talked about writing Navel in 2005, and rewriting it as the series developed. Could you discuss a bit more about how it's different to write the second book of a series than, say, the first or third? What different processes do you use?

I found the second book easier to revise, if nothing else. The main reason for this was once I wrote it, I was able to let it sit aside for months at a time. Then, when it was time to go back in revise, I had fresh eyes on the manuscript. The second book for me was also the most fun. I had a blast doing the time travel sequence. In the first book, I was very concerned about introducing the world. In the third book, the main thing was to make sure all ends were tied. But the second book had a lot of liberty as long as it connected the other two.

From Christine:
Did the idea for The Forgotten Worlds trilogy come to you as a series - or did it become a series as you started to write it? In other words did you think I have a great idea for three books. Or did you start to write the story and realize that it could best be told in three books?

I knew it would be a series, but I hadn't mapped out the entire series before writing. I'd mapped out the first book. In general I knew what the series end would be, but the roadmap wasn't clear. The nice thing about having such a long concept-to-publication time is I was able to liberally edit book one after finishing a draft for book 3.

From Shannon Messenger:
When you're structuring a series, how do you plant things in the first book that don't fully pay off until later books and yet not make it feel like there's holes in the plot of the first book? (Does that even make sense? It does in my head...but I didn't sleep much last night...)

The best way to do this is to have the whole series written before the first book is published! I was able to sneak things into THE EMERALD TABLET and THE NAVEL OF THE WORLD that will have much more significance once THE NECROPOLIS comes out. The main thing I've noticed when trying to plant things is to add things that are almost not noticeable when reading the first book. The reader will glance over them for the most part, but if they go back and re-read THE EMERALD TABLET after reading the entire series, it will be like they are privy to a special secret. Making things much bigger than that does give the feeling of open ends. And open ends don't seem to be too popular with readers or editors these days.

From Robyn Campbell:
What is the one most important thing you want your reader to come away with from reading, The Navel of the World or The Emerald Tablet?

The main thing I want readers to come away with is the desire to read more books. My books aren't "theme" heavy. Sure there are themes in the writing that are basically a part of me, but they aren't in your face. I want to entertain the reader. I want to engage the reader. And I want the reader to want more!

From Miriam S. Forster:
Can you tell us what's next for you after the Forbidden Worlds series? Are there more amazing worlds in the works? What are you working on now?

All mythology! Everything I write seems to have it. I'm not sure I can avoid it. I have a middle grade Egyptian mythology book in the works and a YA Greek mythology also going. I love mythology. Always have. And I want to share this love whenever I can.

From me--again.... ;)
You mentioned in the review that your son is just now reading Navel. I wonder...at what point do you let certain people read your work? Obviously a beta reader is going to read a rough draft, but how rough? Do you keep the first draft personal and send them a second? What about your agent? Your husband? Your children?

I have to feel pretty comfortable to let anyone read anything. I never send off stuff that has inconsistencies or feels very first draft-ish. I tend to write a first draft, revise it a few times, and then let some close critique partners read it. I don't want to waste their time or anyone else's time. So a draft I let beta readers read will be rough but not embarrassing. It should be cohesive. It should have character's names consistent. Once I get this initial feedback, I'll revise again, and then try to get a couple fresh readers. Then I'll revise again. Only then will I send it to the agent.

For the third book in this series, I'll let my son read it either in ARC form or as the manuscript being sent off for the ARC printing. Not before. Too many things change.

From Heather Zundel:
1) What made you think of Atlantis as your first inspiration?

I love the idea of a sunken continent. I always have. According to at least one relative, my family is related to the inhabitants of Atlantis. I'm not saying I buy into this, but I'm putting it out there. What if?

2) I also am curious about structuring a series. Please elaborate in any
way you see fit. :)

Series are hard! Each book needs a solid story arc as does the series overall. Though I hadn't outlined the entire series before starting, I will say this: I am really happy with how the series ends in book 3 (THE NECROPOLIS). To me, the ends are all tied up in a nice, clever way. I have no idea how I managed to do this, but there it is.

3) What is the most important thing about creating characters?

Avoid stereotypes. Everywhere. Even in your peripheral characters. I go with the "try again" method. When a character comes to mind, I try again. I think of the second and then the third thing that comes to mind. I really try to avoid the first. Because almost inevitably, the first thing that comes to mind will be a stereotype.

Also, give your characters a motivation BEFORE the book starts. What does this character want?
And really ask yourself the WHY question. WHY is this character in this story? What makes them be the main character as opposed to somebody else?

4) And - do you outline or write on the fly?

Both. Neither. I've tried all things. My MG stuff seems to entail more outlining whereas my YA writing tends more towards the "let's see where this takes us" mentality. And after trying all things, my theory is that different books call for different tactics. What works for one may not work as well for another.

Rerun Thursday: PJ Hoover Interview for THE EMERALD TABLET

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:11:00 +0000

Last year, I did an interview with PJ for her book THE EMERALD TABLET. Her answers were so good that I thought I'd rerun it today--and give you all a chance to think of some more questions to ask PJ in her interview with YOU tomorrow!

Without further ado...

YOU
We can all read about your bio from the back of your book or your FAQ online. So, what's a completely random fact about you that most people don't know?
In college I used to tell people my name was Athena. And the best part? They believed me! I even had license plates on my red Jeep Wrangler with “Athena J” on them.

Loved college!

Your plane crashed on a deserted island, and Sawyer wasn't on it. You only have one book to entertain yourself with until the rescue comes—if it ever comes. What book do you wish you had with you on the island?
Hmmm…I’d want to make sure either it was the longest book in the world or one I could read over and over. Of the latter, I’ve already read them over and over, so I’ll go with the former and pick Crime & Punishment because: (1) It’s super long; (2) I’ve heard it’s great; (3) I want to read it; and (4) I haven’t yet made the time.

As a child, what did you want to be when you grew up?
An engineer! Boring, I know. But I loved all things computers (and yes, they got big when I was in high school). I taught myself to program Basic on an old Commodore 64 between games of Q*bert and Castle Wolfenstein.

In college, I did hit a slump senior year and decided I wanted to be an archaeologist. I stuck around for a fifth undergraduate year and got a history degree, but then decided engineering would pay way better so I went on to graduate school for Electrical Engineering.

YOUR BOOK
How much of you is in your book? Is there a character like you? Is a situation in the book derived from real life?
Way less then was in the first draft! When I first start writing, I put so much of myself into my book. Luckily, The Emerald Tablet has been through enough revisions that lots of that extra stuff was removed.

Heidi is my favorite character, and I like to think she’s the closest to being modeled after me. She can read minds. Her hair changes color when her emotions flare up. And she ends up having a big crush on…oh, wait, that will come in Book 3.

What was your timeline in The Emerald Tablet? How long did it take to write, revise, submit, and finally, get published? How did you feel at these stages?
First draft – about three months.
Initial revisions – another six months.
At this stage, I thought it was perfect. Yikes! But the good thing is I went ahead and started on Book Two.

About six months later, I met an editor at a conference who offered to read The Emerald Tablet and give me some feedback. Yeah, she was really nice. Her suggestions were eye opening, and I devoured them, jumping back into revisions with a passion.
When I finished, I sent it back, and she read it again and offered more feedback. This went on a few more times, until one day she offered to buy the trilogy!
So to summarize, I started writing The Emerald Tablet in December 2004, signed a contract in February 2007, and hit publication October 2008.

If your reader could only take away one emotion, theme, or idea from The Emerald Tablet, what would you want that to be?
To know that even if you’ve been given talents in life, that’s not enough. You need to make the effort to go above and beyond those talents and see what you can really accomplish.

To phrase it better—Don’t rest on your laurels.

YOUR WRITING
What are your goals as an author? Where do you want to see yourself as a writer in 5, 10, 15 years?
I’d love to have a new book out each year. I want to always keep writing, continuously strive to improve, continuously feel like I am improving, and meet wonderful people. Oh yeah, and live is a giant mansion. And having a theme park after one of my series wouldn’t be too bad either.

What's the most surprising thing you've learned since becoming a writer?
How much I truly love every aspect of it. I love first drafts. I love revisions. I love designing bookmarks in Photoshop. I love sending emails to potential reviewers. I love happy hours with the writing community.

And the list could only go on.

Beyond the typical—never give up, believe in yourself—what would be the single best advice you'd like to give to an aspiring author?
Never give up!

Oh wait, you said beside that.

Do not be afraid to get feedback. Be willing to revise. Take time between revisions. There is no perfect book, and every author can use feedback!

And take yourself seriously.

OK, that was more than one thing! So how about—don’t be afraid to break the rules now and then.

Thanks for the interview, PJ!

Writer's Book Review: PJ Hoover's THE NAVEL OF THE WORLD

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:21:00 +0000

When I first started reading THE NAVEL OF THE WORLD, I wasn't sure what to expect. Benjamin's world is so unique--from telegens to nogicals, the magic and mystery here is unlike any other book I've read.

Elsewhere on the web: I'm sure you all know this already, but PJ runs one of the best blogs on the block and has a website as well. There's a Facebook fan page to the Forbidden Worlds series as well [but I can't seem to get the link to load correctly]. PJ did an interview with Tabitha at Writer Musings here as well.

Five Sentence Summary: [As this is a sequel, the summary might be a spoiler for those who haven't read the first book. Highlight to read.] Benjamin and pals are at it again--now that he knows he needs to locate his long lost fellow triplets, he and his friends are working together to 1) track them down and 2) get them together. When they find one of the triplets in an unusual, er, location, extracting him to unite him with Benjamin proves rather difficult...and some of the friends are going to have to pay a high price to continue their journey.

So what can we, as writers, learn from this book?

1. Consequences for Actions: One of my pet peeves in writing is when there are no serious consequences to a character's actions. It is also one of the most common traits of children's literature. In kid lit, it seems acceptable to the point of being expected that, in the end, the kids win and there's nothing bad happening. Which, of course, is completely unrealistic and so sugar-sweet that even kids can't swallow it. No, the mark of good kid lit is there there are consequences--even when you do the right thing. Consider the Harry Potter series. Part of what made that final battle so amazing was knowing the sacrifices--on Harry's part and on his friends'--that made the victory bittersweet.

Which is what I loved about the ending of THE NAVEL OF THE WORLD. In it, one of the characters must make a serious decision that will have serious consequences. And there's no magic wand to change what happens--it happens, and the characters have to live with how that's changed them, for better or worse. (Highlight for more) Iva must make the decision to give up a year of her life and work with Apollo as a prophet--and Andy makes the decision to stick with Iva. There's no slick way they escape paying their dues--both of them lose that year, and they can't go back and change it. By having these consequences as real repercussions of their decisions, the story is all the more realistic--and that's why I liked it so much.

2. Complex plot twists that are wrapped up logically: In case you haven't heard, there's two very exciting words being bandied about with this book: time travel. TIME TRAVEL! I adore good time travel stories--that's why, after all HARRY POTTER AND THE PRISONER OF AZKABAN was so brilliant in my book. I love the plot twists time travel allows, and PJ fully uses them here. As soon as the kids start zooming back and forth in time, make sure you pay attention to the details and the cleverly layered clues. Trust me--they're important. The key here is not just that PJ uses time travel in the story, it's that she, the writer, is layering clues in the past and present so that when you add them all up, you get a clear picture of the whole story. Time travel is one of the best ways to write using a "gun on the mantle" literary device--put the clue somewhere in the past and have the hero use it in the future, or give a warning in the past and realize it by the climax--that's the key to writing good time travel.

3. Random Fun: Although my high schoolers are loving--LOVING--PJ's series, the target audience for the book is MG. --segue-- I recently started watching iCarly on Nickelodeon. It is hi-larious. And it includes a lot of random humor--during the kids' webshow, they have Random Dancing, the character Sam randomly eats and/or punches people, coincidences abound. Sometimes it's a bit too much for me. But...kids love it. --segue-- Likewise, in THE NAVEL OF THE WORLD, there's a few bits of randomness--the guy with a crush on Iva, the girl who shows up to help the heroes, the kid who inconveniently provides Benjamin with things he needs, the Nogicals (who are, almost by definition, random...and PS, yes I did say NogicalS--there's two now!)--but that is exactly the sort of random happen-chance that kids love. LOVE.

Quibbles: At times, some of the randomness seemed almost like deus ex machina to me, but, as I said, it will definitely appeal to kids and (highlight) don't forget that this *is* a time travel story, so some of the random convenience of objects or tools was actually manufactured by the time travel and a part of the story, although you might not realize that until the end.

The Bottom Line: This one is better than the first. If you liked THE EMERALD TABLET, you'll love THE NAVEL OF THE WORLD. Also: Apollo.

Don't forget! Comment here for extra entries into the give-away for both of PJ's books...and if you have a question about the books, PJ, or writing in general, go to yesterday's post to ask--and get even more entries!

YOUR Interview with an Author

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:22:00 +0000

This worked so well last time that I thought it would be fun to try it again.

This is YOUR chance to interview MG and YA speculative fiction writer, PJ HOOVER! The author of the Forbidden Worlds series (and, I am sure, a future bibliography any spec fic writer would envy), PJ has graciously agreed to answer YOUR questions.

Want to know how to structure a multi-book series? Curious about marketing? Wonder what's in store for Benjamin and pals in the future? (OK, she might not answer that last one...)

ASK AWAY!

This post will be open until Thursday night--so feel free to ask whatever questions you might have. And, as a refresher, here's the interview PJ did with me last year. But feel free to re-ask some questions, see if they changed!

Today in Class: Midterms

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:49:00 +0000

I gave midterms today.

It was 15 questions long.

The kids had an hour and half to answer those 15 measly questions.

Over half of them didn't finish.

*insert evil maniacal teacher laughing here*

As they were leaving, one kid turns to me, rubbing his tired hands and pocketing the remaining nub of his pencil.

Kid: Mrs. Revis, you hate us, don't you.

Me: I don't hate you, I just want to make sure you're learning.

Other Kid: If she doesn't hate us, she must just love our misery.

Book Release Celebration: PJ Hoover Giveaway!

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:25:00 +0000

I'm so excited about PJ Hoover's book release that I just can't stand it! To celebrate, Writing it Out is going to give away two--TWO!--copies of her books! I'll be sending one lucky winner a copy of the first in the trilogy (just in case you're late to the party and have yet to read this fun adventure), and PJ's generously donated a copy of the sequel to a second lucky winner!

So, how do you win? Easy! Just leave a comment here below telling me which of the novels you'd like to win--the first in the series or the sequel--and we'll draw the winner on Sunday! You've got until 11:59pm Saturday to let me know which of the two books you want.

Now, since this is in celebration of PJ's books, and we want to get the word out, there are a few extra ways to enter:

Link this contest to anywhere else--Twitter, Facebook, blogs, etc. for an extra entry each
Ask a interview question for PJ at Tuesday's "Ask the Author" post for an extra entry
Comment and/or link to my review of THE NAVEL OF THE WORLD (which will be posted on Wednesday) for an extra entry each
Post a review of either of PJ's books on your blog or in a public forum for +5 entries
Write a post about how much you want to read either of PJ's book on your blog or in a public forum for +5 entries (such as the popular book reviewer's meme, "Waiting on...")
Please leave all links to your entries here in this post so I can gather names and draw a winner a bit more easily.

That's it! Easy, right? Well...what are you waiting for? Start commenting!

PS: Don't forget to tell me whether you want the first book or the second!

Book Launch Party!

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:09:00 +0000

If you're a fan of PJ Hoover's Forgotten Worlds trilogy, then you probably know that the second book, THE NAVEL OF THE WORLD is released today. If you're in Austin, go see it! If (like me) you're not, then make sure you're a fan of The Forgotten Worlds on Facebook for some quick pics of the event.

October Blog of the Month: Query Tracker!

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:40:00 +0000

As I announced last week, the Query Tracker blog (a part of the QueryTracker.net query program) is the Writing it Out Blog of the Month!

I selected Query Tracker for a few reasons. First, the entire site (both the blog and QueryTracker.net) got a totally new updated look. The redesign not only looks professional, but enhances the functionality.

Second, as I've recently started querying my latest project, I've turned time and again to both the blog and the site. I've quit keeping track of queries through my own paper methods and have started using the Query Tracker premium membership entirely to log my queries, keep my notes organized, and keep track of who and when I've queried. And I've got to say...it's totally worth the low $25/year rate. Since it's online, I find myself able to keep track of things better (as I can access it at school, work, the library, and the coffee shop).

But the blog is so valuable, too! Run by a group of dedicated, professional women--including Carolyn Kaufman, Suzette Saxton, H.L. Dyer, Mary Lindsey, and Elana Johnson--the Query Tracker blog provides valuable insight into various different aspects of writing and publishing.

Among my favorite features of the blog are the inspiration and motivational posts that let us know that our doubts and fears are not unique, tips on specific types of writing and how to improve, and interviews with published authors and agents.

I have two favorite features, though. The first is Medical Fiction Questions Answered, in which Doctor Dyer answers questions about what could happen to characters when they are sick or injured. Need to know how quickly your plague-infested hero could reasonable recover, or how debilitating a broken ankle could be? Does your character need to be seriously harmed but still able to survive? Need to know which poison your murderer should use? Just ask the doctor!

Another feature that I love is the Publishing Pulse. It's hard to keep track of the changing tastes of agents, but Publishing Pulse does just that. Nearly every week, the Query Tracker girls compile all the news about agents and publishers--who's accepting, who's not, who's changed tastes, who's looking for what in each genre--and posts it here. It's updated in the QueryTracker.net page as well (obviously), but if your currently on the hunt for an agent (like me), it helps to know about the changes as they occur, rather than update every agents on your list one at a time.

But you don't have to take my word for it! When I selected Query Tracker as the October blog of the month, I got in touch with the lovely Elana (of FROM THE QUERY TO THE CALL fame), and asked her what her favorite features of being a writer for the Query Tracker blog were. Here is her interview!

What are the origins of the Query Tracker blog?

Well, Patrick McDonald started the blog to go with the main QueryTracker site, but he didn’t have much time to do anything with it. Once he launched RallyStorm (July 2008), he had even less time. A few of us had formed a critique group and well, one day someone (I think it was Carolyn Kaufman) brought up the fact that there was a QT blog and hey, maybe we should take it over. And since I’m totally addicted to blogging, I jumped at the opportunity to be a co-author for the QT blog. We put together a plan (yes, we’re very organized), and sent it to Pat around Christmas of 2008. We started blogging the last week of December, 2008. And the rest is history.

Five of us co-author the blog:

Carolyn Kaufman

Elana Johnson

H.L. Dyer

Mary Lindsey

Suzette Saxton

What do you hope people get from the QT blog?

Well, our slogan is “Helping Writers Become Authors”. That’s the ultimate goal. We try to give writers the tools they need to transform from writers to authors. Things like writing query letters, querying, submitting to agents, finding time to write, perfecting pitches, how to deal with rejection, building platform, as well as the basics like grammar and manuscript formatting. We run the gamut. If you need to know something about writing or publishing, chances are we’re going to address it on the QT blog.

What kinds of features are on the QT blog? What are some of your personal favs?

We have literary agent contests (one coming up in November – very exciting!) and interviews. These are invaluable sources of information for authors looking to query.

H.L. Dyer is a doctor, and she answers medical questions for fiction writers. Carolyn Kaufman has dipped into her field of psychology and answered questions and broken down several stages of publishing for our readers.

We all have our own strengths. We’re all in different stages of our publishing journeys. And that helps us relate to every kind of writer out there, from beginning to advanced, agented to pre-published.

Whoa! How's that for an inside tip--there's an agent contest coming in November! If you need any more convincing, let me assure you of how amazingly awesome that is!

What have been the best advantages of being a writer for the QT blog and/or blogging in general? The biggest downfalls?

Writing for the QueryTracker blog has been awesome. I couldn’t ask for a better group of writers to co-author with. The agents we’ve approached for contests, interviews and judging have been kind and easy to work with. It’s been exciting to see the blog grow so quickly in such a short amount of time.

I think the biggest downfall is keeping things fresh. Not just for the QT blog, but in all blogging. I blog five days a week, and let me tell you, sometimes I’ve got nothing to talk about. On the QT blog, we try to keep our finger on the pulse of the publishing industry and provide posts that will give writers the information they need, when they need it. And that can be a challenge sometimes. But the five of us? We love ourselves a challenge. By the way, we’d love to know what authors out there want to see addressed on the blog!

What is your favorite blog on writing or reading? Why?

Oh, sheesh. You’re asking me? I read so many blogs everyday. Seriously, like an exorbitant, embarrassingly huge amount. If I had to pin down a blog or two, I’d go with the Guide to Literary Agents blog. Chuck does a great job there. I like people who blog about things related to writing that make me analyze what I do. (Like, uh, you, Beth!!) [Edited to add Beth slipping Elana a $20 for the compliments. :) ]

Thanks so much for letting me do this interview! Come follow us or subscribe to the QueryTracker blog!

Query Critique Contest!

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:23:00 +0000

Mary at KidLit.com is sponsoring a query contest on her blog! If you have a completed, ready to submit kid lit book, then check her blog here, submit your query, and enter to win a chance for a 30 page critique! Mary Kole is an associate agent at Andrea Brown Literary Agency, so a crit from her is nothing to sneeze at!

PJ Hoover's THE NAVEL OF THE WORLD

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:48:00 +0000

Have you heard of it yet? Wanna be one of the cool kids in the know? Check out PJ Hoover's latest release, THE NAVEL OF THE WORLD! (Summary stolen shamelessly from PJ's awesome website.)

At the end of summer school, Benjamin was given one task—find his missing brothers. Should be easy right? But Benjamin can't locate a trace of them anywhere. Then he finds a mysterious file written in ancient Lemurian with his name on it, which wouldn't be so weird except the file happens to be several thousand years old. Who would have known about Benjamin that long ago? And then Benjamin and his friends begin to wonder, have they been looking not in the wrong place, but in the wrong time?

Sound awesomely amazing. Oh, it is. And the best news? I get to share my excitement over this novel with you, dear readers! Tomorrow, we're going to start gathering questions from YOU to interview PJ with, and next week we'll have the interview, a book review, and... a giveaway for both PJ's first AND second book!!! So stick around--this'll be fun!

Guest Blog: YA--Not as Fuzzy as Expected

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:41:00 +0000

When I was brainstorming this week of YA discussion, one of the first people I thought to interview was Erin Anderson over at The Screaming Guppy. After having the priveledge to read some of her recent WIP's chapters, I suggested she consider re-aging the book to YA--which led to a lengthy discussion of just what YA is. Erin graciously agreed to share her side of the story here, and without further ado, here's Erin!

YA: Not as fuzzy as expected.

To be honest, the first thing that comes to mind when I think of YA is “Man, another person is writing YA? Yeesh.” My second thought has always been that YA is something I will never, ever write and in most cases, something I stay away from reading.

Why? Well, in following the theme of Beth Revis’ blog week here, I have to admit that part of these feelings come from some things I’ve recently discovered to be false. And I’m not just saying that because I like Beth. :)

What did I think were YA requirements? Here’s the main things:

Main character is a kid, somewhere under the age of 18
YA stories aren’t dark or violent
YA writing is simplified, therefore not as interesting to read

I recently had a conversation with Beth about my manuscript, HOUND IN BLOOD AND BLACK. She asked how the editing was going. I responded, you mean the editing I should be doing instead of playing all these video games? We chatted for a bit and then Beth dropped a bomb that made my heart skip: Have you ever considered writing HOUND for a YA audience?

In my head, I said EW NO WAY. To Beth, I politely replied: Uhm…no?

After she listed some reasons why HOUND might be for right for YA – such as having zombies, something popular with all ages lately – I had to stop her. I stated, very strongly, that I felt like my writing wasn’t geared towards YA.

Of course Beth asked me why not? The only real difference between YA and adult fiction, she continued, is cutting back on world building and back story. Hmm, I thought. I did deliberately go lean on world building and history in HOUND. I wanted the story to be about my characters and not just a new spin on how the zombie apocalypse came about.

But Beth, I said – still convinced there was no way my book could be YA – my book is very violent. Lots of dark topics and things nice little kids shouldn’t be thinking about, much less reading!

That’s when Beth suggested I read THE HUNGER GAMES – a story about kids forced to fight to the death in an arena. I did, I loved it, and I read CATCHING FIRE in the same weekend. Point taken. YA certainly isn’t restricted to puppies and pancakes and a happy high school proms.

But then we found the real problem and one assumption of mine about YA that turned out to be correct. My MC is too old (age 32).

So while I still don’t feel like HOUND would fit in YA (without a major change in main character - something that would be grounds for an entire rewrite), I do see that YA isn’t exactly the animal I thought it was – at least not all of it. And while I enjoyed THE HUNGER GAMES and won’t turn my nose up at a new YA book that catches my interest just because it’s written with a younger audience in mind, I have confirmed that I’m not a YA writer, even if it's only because I don’t enjoy writing from the POV of a younger main character and, more often then not, I love me some heavy duty world building.

Regardless, it’s always nice to find great stories and writing you were missing out on, simply because of a misconception.

GUESS THAT BOOK!

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:00:00 +0000

At the end of this week, I'll be officially announcing a new contest, with an author feature, book review, and interview that will be happening next week.

BUT we had so much fun with the Mystery Book last time, that I thought we'd do a mini-version of it this time!

Next week, I'll be giving away the first book in the series, and the author has agreed to give away the new second book (yay! 2-book giveaway!). We'll be doing a drawing. But, if you'd like to be ahead of the game and start off with TEN extra drawing entries, all you have to do is be the first to guess the book!

Since I'm clearly crap at giving clues (I always think they're so hard, but they're really too easy), I asked the author to come up with the clues. Here they are--now let's see who's the first to GUESS THAT BOOK!

This is second in a trilogy.
The title mentions a body part.
There are stairs on the cover.
Two words: Time Travel
The main character is not human.

OK! Leave your guesses below...the first to guess the book in a comment in this post will get ten extra entries to win a copy in the contest next week.

Mislabeled

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:05:00 +0000

One reason I've been going on and on about YA lately is because I think, in general, YA is often mislabeled. This is mostly because YA is not about an age range, but a genre style--whether book store owners and publishers recognize this fact or not.

But it is important for a book to be marketed correctly. Some books cross over well--some do not.

Take, for example, WINGS by Aprilynne Pike. This book (in the US at least) was widely marketed as a YA. Not just any YA, either, but a romantic fantasy YA endorsed by Stephenie Meyers herself.

Between blurbs, early reviews, and jacket copy, this book was touted as the Next Big YA Paranormal Romance.

There was only one problem.

It wasn't YA. It's MG.

And while to some people this may not seem like a big deal--what's the difference, really, between YA and MG--the reality is that this is an entirely different market. I suspect that many of the negative reviews associated with WINGS come not from poor writing but from the incorrect label of YA. If the book had been marketed as a YA and not an MG, I think much of the criticism would have died away.

Interestingly enough, it appears that this novel is being marketed as MG in the United Kingdom. Take a look at the two different covers and you'll see what I mean.

The UK cover more accurately portrays the book. WINGS is not a dark, mysterious romance of paranormal creatures as the US cover and Meyers blurb implies. No--it's a light fantasy with lots of glitter and fluff, much like the UK cover shows.

Which is where the critcism came in. If people expected a MG book, they would have expected the romance to be the barely-kissing does-he-like-me-or-not kind of romance, not a steamy will-they-or-won't-they romance (such as TWILIGHT). If people had expected a MG, they would have expected the rather easy resolution to the plot, and the more simplistic writing style. Instead, people expected a YA, and when they didn't get a YA, the reviews for the novel went south.

Of course, mislabeling a title works in other ways, too. Consider Orson Scott Card's famous ENDER'S GAME. Originally released as an adult title, many people who would never consider venturing into the YA or MG aisles of a book store picked the title up, read it, and loved it.

Take a look at the original adult cover for the book. It seems solemn and serious, no? This book was being marketed to the adult SF crowd, and there's a strong emphasis in the cover of the qualities adult SF readers want: a space ship, clear indication of interstellar travel, and epic space shot.

Because this book was marketed to adults, adults bought it. However, since then, this book is more often found on the teen or tween shelves. It's been repackaged, too--there are several different version of the cover (including a graphic novel version of the book), but here's the cover that I own -->

Clearly different. In this case, I think the publishers realized they could be tapping into a different market with a younger cover--they correctly realized that ENDER'S GAME is more internalized, character-focused SF and belongs on the teen/tween shelf.

The problem? They've gone in the wrong direction with this cover, making it too young (in my opinion). They've turned the cover into a cartoon, and while they've focused on the character instead of the setting, the character's portrayal will turn many teens off a story they would otherwise love.

These kinds of mislabeling on books happens all the time, and in general I think the covers often reflect the audience. Consider Maria Snyder's adult cover of POISON STUDY and the YA cover of the same novel.

The adult cover has the character--but focuses on the world. Likewise, in adult fantasy, world-builidng often takes priority over characterization. When marketing to adults, it makes sense to wrap the package in what the audience is expecting, and emphasize the world rather than the character.

Problem is, Snyder's story is much more charcter-focused. So, although Yalena is very much an adult character in adult situations (rape, kidnapping, abandonment, murder), her book appealed to teens. This proves my argument that teen books are not about writing books with teens as main characters, but instead about writing books with a focus on internal motivations and strong character studies over elaborate world building and political development.

Almost as if to emphasize my point, the new paperback cover of Snyder's book shows a young adult staring directly at the audience. Forget what you know of the stories, and compare the covers for a moment. The adult cover limits the person, expands on the world--the teen cover is all about the person and almost completely blocks out the world (the world becomes, essentially, decoration to the person through the green vines in her hair).

Knowing which is stronger in your book--world building or characterization--is key in determining whether your book is YA or adult--much moreso than knowing the age of your character. Consider how much easier it would be to change the number age of your character rather than change the entire focus on your novel.

Books are mislabeled all the time: marketers think the market for paranormal romance is stronger in YA than MG and market the book one way; SF is a hard sell in YA so it's marketed to adults rather than the obvious younger audience; a fantasy with an adult character is marketed to adults merely because of the age of the character and not the style of the book. When writing yourself, it's important to evaluate what makes your book MG or YA or adult--and think about it in terms of genre more than age.

The Difference

bethrevis@gmail.com (beth) — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:31:00 +0000

There's already a lot out there about the difference between MG and YA literature--and I'll be tackling that from a different angle later this week.

So what the difference between YA and adult literature?

Well, for starters, YA literature tends to be grouped together on one shelf, while adult literature is "specialized" into genres. Even though a Kristin Cashore novel is vastly different from a Sarah Dessen title, the two will still be shelved side-by-side in a YA section of the bookstore. You would not, for example, see Amanda Quick beside Connie Willis in the adult section.

Why? Well, for starters, I think it's partly because YA is still a growing branch of literature. It wasn't that long ago that all "kids" literature was grouped together. Even my local WaldenBooks had one shelf for picture books, beside the shelf for MG (depsite the obvious differences between the two) and has only moved the teen section to an entirely different part of the store a few year ago...and it still cross-shelves or mis-shelves those titles frequently.

But beyond that, there's also a similarity in YA books that extend beyond the target age range. The pace, characterization, etc., ties the books together. If you (like me) don't care whether there's romance or fantasy or mystery or sci fi, as long as it's a good story, then grouping the sub-genres of YA makes sense. It is actually, in my opinion, typically beneficial. It enables the teens who go to the YA genre to be exposed to--and tempted--by other genres. Many girls start with romance, but come back with fantasy or historical novels because those were grouped together on the shelf. In all fairness, most teens who read for fun read a wider variety of books than adults--just take, for consideration, my mother who goes straight to the romance aisle of the bookstore, versus the average teen who sees all the genres lined up on the same shelf.

On the other hand, beyond the similarities across the board in YA literature, there are some more differences between YA and adult. Let's analyze the sub-genres:

Romance (light romance, no sex)

YA: these stories tend to be sweeter, more about first loves or discovering love
Adult: ditto, although the sense of adventure in finding love is gone, and typically this deals with women who have love fall in their laps after swearing it off

Romance (sexy)

YA: usually first time romances, again with a bittersweet element of discovering love. Can sometimes be about a bad relationship being "fixed" by a better one. And don't think there's no sex in teen lit. It's there--sometimes described, sometimes not.

There are exceptions--I'm thinking Kristin Cashore in particular here--were the relationship is not focused on first time sex (even if it is) but is a much more mature decision. In these cases, I still maintain that typically, in teen lit, a sexual relationship is rarely entered into lightly, and most teen protagonists either think about whether or not to consummate a relationship before or after (or both), whereas there is very little internal "decision making" going on in adult lit.

Adult: Usually a bit more promiscuous than teen lit, to be honest. In teen lit, the teen usually knows and has known the romantic interest for some time. It took Bella four books and a wedding ring to consummate her love with Edward. On the other hand, a lot of adult romances show sexual relationships within the first week or so of the protagonists meeting. This is more about the thrill and danger of the stranger, not about believing you've found true love.

Mystery

Cozy Mysteries

YA: The teen has to play an integral part in solving the mystery--which means the mystery has to have circumstances where a teen can solve it.
Adult: No different from teen mysteries, except that here the elderly woman/spinster/intrepid young librarian/whatever has to have circumstances to solve the crime.

Thriller/Suspence/etc

YA: Actually, I've seen very little in this genre for teens, and what I have seen also tends to include a bit of fantasy/sci fi in it.
Adult: Usually adults, usually professionals (in some capacity) solving the crime. Tends to be darker than other lit.

Fantasy

High/Epic Fantasy

YA: More focus on characters, less on worldbuilding. The plot centralizes (typically) around a character, not an event or a location.
Adult: The opposite--plot centralizes on event/location, not character.

Quest Sub-Genre:

YA: Again, stronger focus on characters. In the quest, the internal struggle of the main character has more importance than the external, although the external struggle is usually quick in pace/high action.
Adult: Less focus on internal struggle, more focus on external struggles. External struggles tend to be more complicated--a slower burn, so to speak.

Contemporary Fantasy

YA: Often has elements of romance, often deals with discovery. Typically, contemporary fantasy in YA is about how magic compliments or mirror's a character's problems, and magical development accompanies character development.
Adult: I'm limited here...I don't know much adult contemporary fantasy. Taking a stab in the dark, I'd guess it's either more romance (i.e. Sherrilyn Kenyon) or magic-realism (i.e. Audrey Whatever-Her-Last-Name-Is-Who-Wrote-TIME-TRAVELER'S-WIFE)

Science Fiction

YA: Typically dystopic future, with an emphasis on an individual character's place in the world.
Adult: Typically space-based, with an emphasis on political background and world-building.

Historical

YA: Sometimes romance-oriented, but with a wider variety of time periods and locations explored (think Cindy Pon, Jane Yolen, A.S. King)
Adult: More often romance-oriented, with a focus on the "romantic" time periods: regency England, Napoleonic times, etc.

That's my limit of experience--I rarely read thrillers or horror from either genre, so I don't really feel qualified to comment there. Could some of you wonderful readers add to the differences between the two?

The Biggest Difference
The bottom line is simple: in the end, the biggest difference between YA and adult literature is simply that YA literature is more willing to take a risk than adult.

Yup.

Adult literature--perhaps because the genres are so clearly developed and readers expect the same thing from the genres--is limited. If you pick up a Regency historical romance, you know what you're going to get even if the author/cover/publisher is different. But if you find that same topic in the YA section, you might get PRADA AND PREJUDICE, or you might get THE SEASON.

And don't get me started on fantasy and science fiction. I gave up on adult sff a long time ago, somewhere around the eight hundredth orc battle. No, YA sff is cranking out zombies (Carrie Ryan), dystopic futures with children-death-battles (Suzanne Collins), mixing fantasy and mystery (Megan Whalen Turner) and innovative magic systems that don't owe anything to Tolkien (Kristin Cashore). And, to top it all off, there's the rising genre of Steampunk--with all it's roots on the teen shelf.

So, in my humble opinion, despite all the lists of differences between YA and adult lit, the best, most important one is simply this:

In YA lit, anything's possible.

...So, in your opinion, what's the biggest difference between YA and adult lit? Can you break down the genres more?