Below is an Article from the LA Times

It’s time fruit juice loses its wholesome image, some experts say

Compared with soda, juice carries more calories and as much sugar. There’s also evidence that high consumption increases the risk of obesity, especially among kids.

Fruit juice: An article in the Nov. 8 Section A about the health effects of drinking 100% fruit juice quoted UC Davis scientist Kimber Stanhope as saying that her studies suggest fructose, a type of sugar, would increase risk factors for cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes equally whether it was consumed in soda or in juice. Stanhope said that overconsumption of soda or 100% fruit juice would probably promote similar weight gain, one risk factor for heart disease and diabetes. However, she did not mean to imply that consumption of fructose from soda versus juice would have equal effects on other risk factors, such as increased blood triglyceride levels and decreased insulin sensitivity. She believes it is possible —though unproven — that other components of juice may protect against those effects.

It’s an awkward issue for the schools that peddle fruit juice in their cafeterias and vending machines. It’s uncomfortable for advocates of a junk-food tax who say they can’t afford to target juice and alienate its legions of fans. It’s confusing for consumers who think they’re doing something good when they chug their morning OJ, sip 22-ounce smoothies or pack apple juice in their children’s lunches.

The inconvenient truth, many experts say, is that 100% fruit juice poses the same obesity-related health risks as Coke, Pepsi and other widely vilified beverages.

With so much focus on the outsized role that sugary drinks play in the country’s collective weight gain — and the accompanying rise in conditions including diabetes, heart disease and cancer — it’s time juice lost its wholesome image, these experts say.

“It’s pretty much the same as sugar water,” said Dr. Charles Billington, an appetite researcher at the University of Minnesota. In the modern diet, “there’s no need for any juice at all.”

A glass of juice concentrates all the sugar from several pieces of fruit. Ounce per ounce, it contains more calories than soda, though it tends to be consumed in smaller servings. A cup of orange juice has 112 calories, apple juice has 114, and grape juice packs 152, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The same amount of Coke has 97 calories, and Pepsi has 100.

And just like soft drinks, juice is rich in fructose — the simple sugar that does the most to make food sweet.

UC Davis scientist Kimber Stanhope has found that consuming high levels of fructose increases risk factors for heart disease and Type 2 diabetes because it is converted into fat by the liver more readily than glucose. Her studies suggest that it doesn’t matter whether the fructose is from soda or juice.

“Both are going to promote equal weight gain,” she said, adding that she’s perplexed by the fixation on the evils of sugar-sweetened beverages: “Why are they the only culprit?”

OJ for the masses

Juice is a relatively recent addition to the human diet. For thousands of years, people ate fruit and drank mostly water.

But in the early 1900s, citrus growers in Florida were harvesting more oranges than they could sell. Then they had an epiphany: promote juice.

“You consume more oranges if you drink them than if you eat them whole,” said Alissa Hamilton, author of the book “Squeezed: What You Don’t Know About Orange Juice.”

The U.S. Army was instrumental in turning orange juice into a commercial product.

It originally served a powdered lemonade to ensure soldiers got enough vitamin C, but it tasted “like battery acid,” Hamilton said. So, during World War II, the Army commissioned scientists to invent a system for freezing OJ in a concentrated form. The patent wound up with Minute Maid, which sold cans of frozen juice concentrate in grocery stores.

In the 1950s, pasteurization technology developed by Tropicana made orange juice even more consumer-friendly because it could be sold ready to drink in cartons, like milk.

TV fitness pioneer Jack LaLanne and other health experts touted juice as a natural medicine, and decades of advertising helped secure its place at the breakfast table. Today, roughly half of all Americans consume juice regularly, according to NPD Group, a market research firm.

The Juice Products Assn. emphasizes the value of the vitamins, minerals and phytonutrients in juice, especially when so many Americans eat so little fresh produce.

“If someone can add a glass of fruit juice at breakfast, that’s an important addition to the diet,” said Sarah Wally, a dietitian for the trade group.

But scientists are increasingly questioning whether the benefits outweigh the sugar and calories that come with them. “The upside of juice consumption is so infinitesimal compared to the downside that we shouldn’t even be having this discussion,” said Dr. Robert Lustig, a pediatric endocrinologist at UC San Francisco.

Weight factor

Researchers haven’t published head-to-head comparisons of how juice and soda contribute to weight gain, but there is evidence that high juice consumption increases the risk of becoming overweight or obese, especially among kids.

One of the earliest studies, in 1997, examined 168 preschool-age children in upstate New York. Kids who drank at least 12 ounces of juice a day were 3 1/2 times more likely than other kids to exceed the 90th percentile for body mass index, qualifying them as overweight or obese.

A 2006 study of 971 low-income youngsters found that each extra glass of juice a day caused children who were already overweight or obese to gain an extra pound each year.

The link between juice and weight gain isn’t always found, however. In a 2008 review of 21 studies, six supported the connection and 15 did not.

In fact, several researchers have linked juice to healthier diets and lower weights. A 2008 report of 3,618 children ages 2 to 11 found that kids who drank at least 6 ounces of juice a day consumed less fat and more vitamins and minerals than kids who drank no juice at all.

But many experts say the data simply reflect a correlation between juice and healthful diets, not a causal relationship.

“Kids who drink more juice are more likely to be eating breakfast, and kids who eat breakfast tend to weigh less than kids who don’t,” said Kelly Brownell, director of the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University.

There’s also concern that children who drink lots of sweet beverages such as juice will develop a lifelong preference for sweeter foods. A 2004 Dutch study found that 8- to 10-year-olds preferred sweeter drinks after consuming a sugary orangeade for eight days. They also drank more of it as they acclimated to its sweet taste.

Doctors and health officials have been persuaded to de-emphasize juice in recent years.

The American Academy of Pediatrics’ nutrition committee revised its policy in 2001 to recommend that children ages 1 to 6 drink no more than one 4- to 6-ounce serving of juice a day and older kids have no more than two.

“Because juice is viewed as nutritious, limits on consumption are not usually set by parents,” the committee wrote in “The Use and Misuse of Fruit Juice in Pediatrics.”;107/5/1210 “Like soda, it can contribute to energy imbalance,” causing the weight gain that leads to obesity.

The government’s 2005 dietary guidelines recognize that juices can be good sources of potassium, but recommend whole fruit for the majority of daily fruit servings to ensure adequate intake of fiber.

In October, the federal Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children introduced vouchers for fresh produce and reduced the juice allowance. That’s a change Billington and his colleagues in the Minnesota Medical Assn. had been pushing for since 2006.

“Having apple juice and eating an apple are not the same,” he said.

Concentrated sugar

Indeed, as scientists zero in on the causes of rising obesity rates, sugary drinks have emerged as a primary culprit.

Calories consumed in liquid form don’t give stomachs the same satisfied feeling as calories eaten in food. People offset an afternoon snack by eating less at dinner, but they don’t do that with beverages.

“The studies are pretty clear,” said Dr. Barbara Dennison, a research and policy director at the New York State Department of Health in Albany. “You just don’t compensate for those calories.”

Making matters worse, the human body is ill-equipped to process the sugar that is concentrated in a glass of juice.

When fructose is eaten in a piece of fruit, it enters the body slowly so the liver has time to convert it into chemical energy. But a single glass of apple juice has the fructose of six apples.

“If you overdose on fructose in a liquid, the liver gets overwhelmed,” Lustig said. As a result, he said, the fructose turns to fat. “Eating fruit is fine. Drinking juice is not.”

Still, the halo surrounding juice remains strong.

As soda is singled out for its role in the rise of obesity, juice is offered as the sensible alternative. In Los Angeles and elsewhere, it is taking the place of soft drinks in school vending machines alongside water and milk.

Brownell of Yale has waged a high-profile campaign to fight obesity with “sin” taxes on soda and other sugary drinks. It’s already an uphill battle, and he said he’s loath to provoke the tens of millions of Americans who consider their morning juice sacrosanct.

Dr. Frank Greer, who spent 10 years on the American Academy of Pediatrics’ nutrition committee, said he “can’t imagine” the group would ever downgrade juice to the status of soda.

“It’s such a normal part of the American diet,” Greer said. “A glass of fresh-squeezed orange juice for breakfast, my goodness!”

Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times

Related posts

• Pancreatic Cancer Risk Linked To Soft Drinks (1)
• An Early Grave From Drinking Soda? (2)
• Acai Berry & Yoli Blastcaps® (0)
• Philadephia To Impose Soda Tax (1)
• What Is Diabetes? (0)
• Lose Tummy Fat (0)
• Yoli Review: The Journey of The Yoli Blastcaps® (1)

The following article was posted by CBS12 Action News on 5/29/2010

First The new push towards a sugar  tax and now the ban on these overate,sugar laden sports drinks! Could the introduction of Yoli be any more perfect? In the coming weeks consumers will see new packaging of Yoli in a canister. While the Blastcaps offer convenience for our busy lifestyles the canisters allow the company to literally bring the price point down to current Gatorade & Powerade prices. For both distributors and consumers alike this a No Brainer. Why feed our bodies, both children and adults anything else?  Yoli literally has all of the good and none of the bad! All for the same price. This is something we can all feel good about.

Read the article here…

The senate voted 21 to 11 Thursday to get rid of sports drinks in public middle and high schools. It’s a move designed to prevent childhood obesity. “I see what the state’s trying to do to cut on sugar intake, but I think there has to be some balance there also” explained Corning High School health teacher Corine Maday.

These drinks are a favorite among athletes who gulp them down after sweating it out at practice. “I think that Gatorade, they may have sugar in them, but they’re also good for athletes cause they have electrolytes and other things that are good for you in them” stated Samantha Pigmon, a Corning High School senior. Cornine Maday agrees that the drinks are valuable when she explained that “Gatorade does have as much calories and sugars as soda, but it does have electrolytes”.

She also says that those electrolytes are beneficial to students who participate in sports and that they may also help with student performance “We know that kids who eat well and are nourished do better on tests and perform better in school”.

The absence of the drink during school hours may force students to choose healthier drinks, but some say stopping there won’t really make a difference “Less sugar in people’s diets, but then again, it does happen at home though, it’s all what the parents do” said Luis Piseno, a Corning High School senior. Corine Maday also feels that ” Education for parents would help, having, or implementing physical education in schools”.
Corning high school has already made many changes to provide its students with healthy options. “I think we have come miles in our cafeteria, in what we serve and how we serve” stated Maday. Whatever the measure’s outcome, in the end, children must also be responsible for their own choices, and Maday feel that “Whatever is available, kids will choose, if we have healthy things for them to choose, they will still choose it”.
Sports drinks have already been banned from california’s elementary schools. The bill will now move to the assembly to be voted on.

Related posts

• An Early Grave From Drinking Soda? (2)
• Acai Berry & Yoli Blastcaps® (0)
• Soda Makes You Fat – Really! New Studies Recently Released (0)
• Philadephia To Impose Soda Tax (1)
• Pancreatic Cancer Risk Linked To Soft Drinks (1)
• You Know You Have Something Good When…. (0)
• YoliLife Has launched! The Anticipation Builds! (0)

Study Shows Those Who Often Drink Soda Have a Higher Pancreatic Cancer Risk

From ABC News/Health

By CHRIS EMERY
Contributing Writer, MedPage Today

Regular consumers of sugary soft drinks are at higher risk for pancreatic cancer than fruit juice drinkers or the general population, a new Singaporean study has found.
Study of soda drinkers in Singapore suggests they have a greater risk of cancer.

Chinese men and women living in Singapore who drank two or more soft drinks per week were 87 percent more likely to develop pancreatic cancer after the researchers adjusted for factors such as smoking, according to the report published Feb. 8 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

“In this large prospective cohort of Chinese men and women in Singapore, those who reported regular soft drink consumption were at increased risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with those who largely abstained,” Mark Pereira, of the School of Public Health at the University of Minnesota, and colleagues wrote. “There was no association between consumption of juice and risk of pancreatic cancer.”

While pancreatic cancer is relatively rare, it is one of the most deadly cancers, with less than 5 percent of patients surviving five years after diagnosis. Although rates have generally plateaued in the U.S., they continue to climb in some Asian countries, including Singapore.

“This increase may reflect demographic and socioeconomic shifts as well as a transition towards a more westernized lifestyle and diet,” the authors wrote.

Research has shown that insulin promotes pancreatic cancer cell growth, and some researchers think sugary foods could result in blood sugar and insulin fluctuations that expose the pancreas to high concentrations of insulin.

While fruit juices contain sugar, soft drinks are the major sources of added sugar in the U.S. diet and major contributors to hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia.

Pereira and colleagues followed 60,524 men and women who enrolled in the Singapore Chinese Health Study between April 1993 and December 1998 and were followed for 14 years.

At enrollment, the participants completed a 146-question food frequency questionnaire, which contained three items related to soft drinks and juice. The questions asked the participants how much, if any, they drank of soft drinks such as Coca-Cola and 7-Up, orange juice, and other fruit and vegetable juices.

The dietary data was later cross-referenced with records from the Singapore Cancer Registry and the Singapore Registry of Births and Deaths, to determine which of the participants had died of pancreatic cancer and whether it might be related to their soft drink or juice consumption.

Overall, researchers found that 140 participants had developed pancreatic cancer.

The results were largely consistent with three of four previous U.S. studies on the links between pancreatic cancer and soft drinks. Three of the U.S. studies found an association between soft drinks and cancer.

The author acknowledged that soft drink consumers are more likely than abstainers to participate in other unhealthy behaviors, including smoking and overeating, which makes it difficult to determine that soft drink consumption is an independent risk factor for pancreatic cancer.

For instance, smokers in their study were at higher risk for pancreatic cancer. “We could not rule out the possibility of residual confounding by factors associated with the habit of drinking soft drinks or other unascertained factors such as waist circumference,” they wrote.

They also noted that the study was limited in statistical power because pancreatic cancer is rare, which limited the sample size of cancer cases. “Also, because we were unable to collect repeated dietary measurements in this study, we were unable to account for changes in consumption of soft drinks and juices,” they wrote, “especially when the diagnosis of diabetes occurred after the baseline interview.”

The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute.

The authors reported no financial conflicts of interest.

Related posts

• An Early Grave From Drinking Soda? (2)
• Not Quite So Wholesome As One Would Think (0)
• Acai Berry & Yoli Blastcaps® (0)
• Yoli Review: The Journey of The Yoli Blastcaps® (1)
• What Is Diabetes? (0)
• Lose Tummy Fat (0)
• Classic Shiatsu Massage Therapy Is Replicated In A Massage Chair (0)

Related posts

• Acai Berry & Yoli Blastcaps® (0)
• Yoli Review: The Journey of The Yoli Blastcaps® (1)
• Lose Tummy Fat (0)
• Classic Shiatsu Massage Therapy Is Replicated In A Massage Chair (0)
• Bottled Water – The Biggest Advertising Gimmick (0)
• Yoli, What Is It Exactly? Or Is it a Scam? (0)
• What Is Diabetes? (0)

Six thousand deaths over the last decade could have been avoided if Americans drank less soda and sugary beverages, according to an analysis from the University of California, San Francisco.

The analysis found that America’s growing sweet drink addiction has taken a hefty toll through health outcomes such as heart disease and diabetes and via higher health care costs.

Diana Ray of Danville, Ky., is familiar with the negative effects of soda addiction. Since she retired from her job as a registered nurse, Ray’s consumption of soda steadily inched upward until she was drinking five to eight cans a day — as much as an extra 1,200 extra calories and 328 grams of added sugar.

“I always have a Pepsi open on the table next to the bed, when I’m in bed in the morning with my coffee,” Ray said. “It’s an addiction.”

An expensive addiction, Ray added, as the household goes through a 24-pack every other day, which adds up at $7 a pop.

But Ray’s biggest motivation for quitting is rescuing her health and well-being: Since she switched from diet to regular soda she has put on 30 pounds, which is “horrifying” to her, especially because diabetes runs in her family.

The new analysis, presented Friday at the American Heart Association’s 50th Annual Conference on Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, offers a picture of just how horrifying the damage done by excess consumption of sugary drinks can be.

Using a computer model and data from the Framingham Heart Study, the Nurses Health Study and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, researchers estimated that the escalating consumption between 1990 and 2000 of soda and sugar-sweetened beverages, which they abbreviated as “SSBs,” led to 75,000 new cases of diabetes and 14,000 new cases of coronary heart disease.

What’s more, the burden of the diseases translated into $300 million to $550 million increase in health care costs between 2000 and 2010.

The model is “really important because it gives us a big picture that might serve as a more effective impetus for health policies to curb consumption,” said Dr. Litsa Lambrakos, lead author and internal medicine resident at the University of California, San Francisco.

“A lot of people drink these drinks on a daily basis and they have little to no nutritional value. We want [the public] to know that they should not be considered a staple of the American diet,” she said.

Soda Pop Culture

Data shows that more Americans are drinking soda or other sugary drinks on a daily basis — and having larger portions, more frequently — than ever before, Lambrakos said.

 

Consumption of soda and sugary beverages is on the rise for Americans — a habit that may have grave implications for public health.

(Getty Images)

This trend is not only expensive for the American public, it’s downright deadly. The analysis estimates that a combined 21,000 years of potential life were lost to Americans over the last decade when increased consumption of the drinks led to premature death.

And it’s not just the amount of sugar in the beverages, it’s the kind. Lambrakos cited one study that found that people drinking soda or SSBs had an increased risk of diabetes while those drinking similar calorie and sugar loads of 100 percent fruit juice had no such increased risk.

But the beverage industry vehemently disagreed with this claim.

“Heart disease and diabetes are complex problems with no single cause and no simple solutions. Consuming sugar-sweetened beverages is not a risk factor” for either condition, the American Beverage Association (ABA) wrote in a press release on the analysis.

The ABA is a trade organization that represents the interests of beverage companies such as Pepsico and Coca-Cola.

“Sugars are sugars, calories are calories,” said Maureen Storey, nutritionist and senior vice president of science policy at the ABA, so there should be no difference in obesity or disease risk for someone drinking high-fructose-corn-syrup-sweetened soda or 100 percent juice.

“Your body is not smart enough to figure out whether the sugar was add by a manufacturer or by nature,” she added. “As far as I know, there is no scientific data to prove that high fructose corn syrup is any worse for you than any other kind of sugar.”

When questioned about studies showing that processed sugars have a higher glycemic index, and thus a greater impact insulin resistance and diabetes risk, Storey said, “People get confused. That’s a laboratory experiment, not real life.”

Instead, the ABA believes that sodas and SSBs can be part of a healthy lifestyle, as long as people learn to balance out the calories they consume through the drinks with exercise and healthy eating.

Towards this effort, the ABA supports comprehensive nutritional education and has helped put programs into place that remove full-calorie drinks from school cafeterias.

Towards a Soda Tax

But there may not be much room for spending “discretionary” calories on soda if someone is eating a balanced diet, said Dr. Robert Eckel, a spokesman for the American Heart Association.

“If someone’s drinking three 16-ounce Pepsis, ultimately it is either replacing a lot of calories that should go towards healthy food or they’re gaining a lot of weight,” Eckel said.

To encourage Americans to spend their calories elsewhere — hopefully on more healthful indulgences — many policymakers support the use of a “soda tax” on all beverages with sugar added, including sodas, sweetened ice teas and chocolate milk.

n his research on the subject, Dr. Kelly Brownell, the director of the Yale Center for Eating and Weight Disorders, said he “propose[s] a one-cent-per-ounce tax, which should decrease consumption by 23 percent — that’s enough to decrease health care costs by $50 billion over a 10-year time span.”

Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter recently went further than the standard penny-an-ounce approach, proposing a two-cent-per-ounce tax on sugary beverages, which would add $1.44 to the price of a six-pack of soda.

More and more cities and states are considering such a tax, Brownell said, but not if the beverage industry has anything to do with it.

In 2009 alone, the ABA spent $18.8 million lobbying against soda taxes, according to Kevin Keane, senior vice president for public affairs at the ABA, and most of that was spent in the last two quarters, when there was talk of a federal soda tax.

“This is a flat out attack on our industry,” said Christopher Gindlesperger, director of communications at the ABA. “It’s a discriminatory tax put on the back of hard working families. … People don’t want the government digging around in their shopping cart.”

The industry is “willing to use whatever resources we deem necessary to get policy leaders and other opinion makers to understand that these taxes are unfair and regressive,” he said.

But advocates of the tax hope it will decrease consumption the way cigarette taxes have decreased smoking habits, especially considering consumers will have other, cheaper, untaxed beverage options, such as juice, diet soda and unsweetened teas.

Diana Jay agreed a tax might deter her from consuming so much soda, though she’s not sure about other people.

Cutting down soda is still such an uphill battle for her, she said, that she’ll take any help she can get.

Related posts

• Pancreatic Cancer Risk Linked To Soft Drinks (1)
• What Is Diabetes? (0)
• Not Quite So Wholesome As One Would Think (0)
• Another Pending Ban On Sport Drinks – Could Yoli’s Timing Be Any More Perfect? (0)
• Acai Berry & Yoli Blastcaps® (0)
• Yoli Review: The Journey of The Yoli Blastcaps® (1)
• Lose Tummy Fat (0)

What Is Alkalete®?

Alkalete® is a proprietary mineral complex that is very safe yet strong alkalizing agent. The Alkalete® granules have 3 properties manufactures in with a proprietary process that uses the patented Exact Blending and Compounding (“EBC”) equipment.

Its main properties are :

1) Reduces the acidity of foods and beverages without damaging flavor,
2) Increases the absorbency of key nutrients and
3) achieves a systematic alkaline balance and increases overall hydration in the body to improve healthy aging and athletic performance

Why Do YOU Need it?

A growing health concern is chronic low grade metabolic acidosis. A decline of health begins with a process called metabolic acidosis – cellular ph moves towards becoming acidic, toxic & polluted says leading medical researchers. Like the acid in your car’s battery these metabolic acids are sulfuric acids, phosphoric acid and nitric acid.

There IS Scientific Validation…

Independent, peer-reviewed research links acid/alkaline imbalances with limitations on athletic endurance, deteriorating health, and chronic conditions often associated with aging and age-related health limitations. Alkalete® consists entirely of ingredients designated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) as GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe).1 It received FDA recognition as a New Dietary Ingredient (NDI), a designation of product safety and uniformity.2

You can enjoy “Optimal Living through Optimal Body ph” by combating this rise in excess acidity by taking Alkalete®.

Where can I Get Alkalete®?

Just go to www.MyDrinkBlast.com where you can read and watch more about this amazing new ingredient and the newest products available.

Why give your children Gaterade & Powerade- (sugar laden, pasteurized, with artificial colors & flavors) when for the just about the Same Price YOUR WHOLE FAMILY can enjoy the benefits Yoli®?

Enjoy our super fruit, anti-oxidant blend with our first product Yoli® TRUTH (tastes like a melted Orange Popsicle- YUM! ) and our JUST RELEASED Lemon Lime FUN beverage with 750 mg of Alkalete®.

Are you an athlete or work out heavily? Then you’ll want our new Alkalete® capsules with 500 mg per capsule in conjunction with the FUN Beverage. As a side note – Yoli® FUN beverage & capsules are endorsed by Gold Medalists Carl Lewis and Bryan Clay!

www.MyDrinkBlast.com

Related posts

• A Stroke Of Genius By The Yoli Founder’s (0)
• Yoli, What Is It Exactly? Or Is it a Scam? (0)
• Being Part Of The Yoli Dream Team! (0)
• Yoli Review: The Journey of The Yoli Blastcaps® (1)
• Yoli Blastcaps Whisper Campaign Has Turned Into A Roar! (1)
• Just Where Did Corey Citron, Daren Falter & Robby Fender Go? (0)
• Corey Citron Makes It Official (2)

I just came across a new video by Dr. Mercola -in The World’s #1 Free Natural Health Newsletter. It is absolutely unbelievable what we are not only doing to ourselves by to the world we live in. It just totally amazes me how we can live in our world and not pay attention to the cause and effects of our daily actions. The natural resources we are consuming by shipping bottled water around the world is staggering. The chemicals and poisons that are leaching into  the water we are consuming from the plastic bottles. Tap water that is being advertised as “natural”, straight from the mountain springs is mind boggling. We are buying “Functional Beverages” that companies are adding enormous amounts of added sugar & preservatives and being sold that these are good for us. WAKE UP AMERICA!

Watch this short video and read the article below it posted by Dr. Mercola and started making a Difference TODAY! Say NO to bottled water and you CAN make a Huge difference in keeping our PLANET GREEN

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/05/06/a-movie-about-water-you-need-to-see.aspx

Related posts

• Yoli Review: The Journey of The Yoli Blastcaps® (1)
• Is This Your Year? (0)
• Soda Makes You Fat – Really! New Studies Recently Released (0)
• Business Opportunity (0)
• Yoli, What Is It Exactly? Or Is it a Scam? (0)
• Acai Berry & Yoli Blastcaps® (0)
• Just Where Did Corey Citron, Daren Falter & Robby Fender Go? (0)