tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2011:mephisto//comments Mephisto Drax 2010-09-06T21:14:16Z infrelisr tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2009-07-21:95395:132022 2010-09-06T21:14:16Z 2010-09-06T21:14:16Z Жаль, что сейчас не могу высказаться - очень занят. Но вернусь - обязательно напишу что я думаю по этому вопросу. По моему мнению Вы ошибаетесь. Давайте обсудим. Пишите мне в PM, поговорим. ну......зачёт!!! Спасибо, может, я тоже могу Вам чем-то помочь? И я с этим столкнулся. Можем пообщаться на эту тему. Здесь или в PM. http://inforeliz.ru John Bamfud tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2008-10-27:63634:128322 2010-07-30T00:16:39Z 2010-07-30T00:16:39Z Paul, you have come a long way, thank you for your efforts! theagingfanboy tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2009-02-16:83188:83228 2009-02-16T17:04:28Z 2009-02-16T17:04:28Z Just think of the money we would save if we didn't bother giving medical treatment to people who smash themselves up driving too fast. And all that money on people whose only problem is that they eat too much. We're all in this together...... Chris Jenkins tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2009-01-09:78804:79181 2009-01-13T13:44:21Z 2009-01-13T13:44:21Z This is an interesting one,...on one hand I regard it as unethical to the remove the donated kidney...on the other hand , this is a husband who loved is wife sufficiently to give her one of his kidneys, how many people (male or female) would do that for a partner? In answer to the question posed, a recipient should show some gratitude to the donor, afterall, the donor has given the most expensive gift possible, LIFE!....does anyone seriously believe the husband would have gone through with the procedure had he known his wife would leave as soon as she no longer needed him? The other question I'd like answered before giving a categorical answer is , what condition was the relationship in prior to the transplant? obviously the husband thought it was good, what about the wife? Paul Gill tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2009-01-09:78804:79104 2009-01-12T16:08:46Z 2009-01-12T16:08:46Z given that this is an american case it will be interesting to see how this plays out in the courts. lawyers have already indicated that the transplant cannot be considered as an asset to be 'divided up' because of the very nature of what it is. a gift with strings is not a gift at all. this story was discussed by jeremy vine on radio 2 on friday. transplants often have a transformative effect on many recipients (many of whom are often quite ill for some time prior to transplantation). Consequently some recipients re-evaluate their life (and their relationships, particulalry if they are problematic) when their health is restored. Claire tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2009-01-09:78804:78908 2009-01-10T22:20:08Z 2009-01-10T22:20:08Z its a bit sick wanting a kidney back and actualy putting someone through dialysis. I have kidney problems myself nd this man makes me sick.......i feel sorry for his wife Matt Hayes tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2009-01-09:78804:78818 2009-01-09T15:46:02Z 2009-01-09T15:46:02Z Surely organ donation is seen as a gift you can't take back. I don't think any reputable surgeon would even consider removing a kidney and forcing dialysis on a patient. Paul Gill tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2008-11-17:68314:68793 2008-11-19T09:33:41Z 2008-11-19T09:33:41Z the proposed opt out system was one of presumed consent - ie, it would be presumed that the person wanted to donate, unless they had registered their wishes not to. There was however an underlying concern amongst health professionals about how the system would work in practice. primarily there was a fear that it would undermine trust in Drs and nurses, especially if the family's wishes were ignored at such a sensitive time. Despite the PMs rhetoric, I suspect this proposal is dead in the water, for the time being at least Drew tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2008-11-17:68314:68361 2008-11-17T14:56:47Z 2008-11-17T14:56:47Z I cant help but feel that this was perhaps misrepresented in the media. From my understanding the current situation was that a person either had to been a donor carrier or other expressed an intrest in donation (the card being a method to record this) AND their family give consent to the procedure. The "opt-out" scheme would assume that they DID want to donor unless they expressed otherwise (their family would still have to give consent). The second part in effect acting as a safe guard. That is slightly different to how certain aspects of the media were reporting. pete tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2008-11-11:67165:67177 2008-11-11T15:09:39Z 2008-11-11T15:09:39Z surely if a person is mentally competant and mature enough they have a right to decide what is best for them? Maggie tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2008-10-27:63634:63650 2008-10-27T13:31:54Z 2008-10-27T13:31:54Z Congratulations Paul! The Telling Stories team is interested in expanding the resource to address cultural aspects in relation to genetics, so we know where to come for advice! Allyson Lipp tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2008-10-01:56673:58043 2008-10-03T12:12:20Z 2008-10-03T12:12:20Z Hi Matt, My previous reply can also be applied to your question. Choice, where appropriate (depending on gestation and medical history etc) is valued by women and advised in the National Guidelines by the Royal College of Obsterics and Gynaecology (2004). Allyson Lipp tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2008-10-01:56673:58040 2008-10-03T12:08:53Z 2008-10-03T12:08:53Z Hi Paul, Research has found that giving women choice of abortion method is moe important than which method is chosen. Although my study did not look into this aspect of abortion care. Matt Hayes tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2008-10-01:56673:57926 2008-10-02T11:05:19Z 2008-10-02T11:05:19Z Why do you need to provide a choice? Shouldn't these types of decisions be left to the experts? Paul Gill tag:acutecare.weblog.glam.ac.uk,2008-10-01:56673:57845 2008-10-01T11:00:31Z 2008-10-01T11:00:31Z Does choice of the actual method of abortion affect the women's experience in anyway?