<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.adamsmith.org/latest-blogs.xml" content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" og="http://ogp.me/ns#" rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" sioct="http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#">
  <channel>
    <title>Adam Smith Institute blog</title>
    <link>http://www.adamsmith.org/latest-blogs.xml</link>
    <description />
    <language>en</language>
          <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/adamsmithinstitute" /><feedburner:info uri="adamsmithinstitute" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
    <title>Ten reasons why the Left should like the ASI, 9: Choice</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~3/jN34PCmw5Uo/ten-reasons-why-the-left-should-like-the-asi-9-choice</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;The Left ought to support our campaigns to put power over these services into the hands of the people who use them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~4/jN34PCmw5Uo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15977 at http://www.adamsmith.org</guid>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/healthcare/ten-reasons-why-the-left-should-like-the-asi-9-choice</feedburner:origLink></item>
  <item>
    <title>More on the ultimatum game</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~3/GaKzCYvs7vA/more-on-the-ultimatum-game</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;A few days back I mused, almost as an afterthought, on whether the ultimatum game would be played the same way in all human societies. This is the game where player 1 gets to split $100, player 2 decidding whether or not to accept the split. If the division, 50/50, 60/40, 99/1, whatever, is accepted then both players get their money. If it's rejected, then neither gets any.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~4/GaKzCYvs7vA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15974 at http://www.adamsmith.org</guid>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/economics/more-on-the-ultimatum-game</feedburner:origLink></item>
  <item>
    <title>Ten reasons why the Left should like the ASI, 8: Immigration</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~3/G4GSQPyUy9U/ten-reasons-why-the-left-should-like-the-asi-8-immigration</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;The Left, traditionally supportive of immigration, should admire the ASI's stance in consistently arguing that the UK benefits by welcoming immigrants to our shores.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~4/G4GSQPyUy9U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15976 at http://www.adamsmith.org</guid>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/international/ten-reasons-why-the-left-should-like-the-asi-8-immigration</feedburner:origLink></item>
  <item>
    <title>An end to zombie politics 6: Broadcasting</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~3/gBmHi2LD2G0/an-end-to-zombie-politics-6-broadcasting</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;The government needs revenues and holds too many assets on its books. In future blogs, I will return to its holdings in finance and healthcare. For the time being, let’s look at its involvement in media, specifically broadcasting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~4/gBmHi2LD2G0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15973 at http://www.adamsmith.org</guid>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/media-culture/an-end-to-zombie-politics-6-broadcasting</feedburner:origLink></item>
  <item>
    <title>23 Things We're Telling You About Capitalism IX</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~3/Ixvvv3PoDw8/23-things-were-telling-you-about-capitalism-ix</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;The ninth thing we're told is that even though manufacturing is becoming a smaller part of our economy, of all economies, it's still very important oh yes indeed it is! There's a certain sadness in watching the argument develop in this chapter in fact.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~4/Ixvvv3PoDw8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 06:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15975 at http://www.adamsmith.org</guid>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/economics/23-things-were-telling-you-about-capitalism-ix</feedburner:origLink></item>
  <item>
    <title>Chart of the week: US personal income and expenditure</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~3/0zY16QuxEoQ/chart-of-the-week-us-personal-income-and-expenditure</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" src="/sites/default/files/Screen%20shot%202013-05-15%20at%2011.34.00_0.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Summary: US household spending is holding up&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What the chart shows: The chart shows the % change in US personal income and expenditure in nominal terms in the most recent three months (January-March 2013) compared with the previous three months (October-December 2012)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~4/0zY16QuxEoQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 23:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15970 at http://www.adamsmith.org</guid>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/chart-of-the-week-us-personal-income-and-expenditure</feedburner:origLink></item>
  <item>
    <title>The debt and deficit cost of political policies</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~3/ecnHdfVga5M/the-debt-and-deficit-cost-of-political-policies</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;UK Conservative Party Co-Chairman Grant Shapps MP has started "deficit alerts" on his Twitter account whenever a Labour politician appears on television to demand more spending on this or that. Here is a sample:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@grantshapps: "Deficit Alert! Ed Balls calls for £16.5bn more borrowing "this year" on #Murnaghan - same old Labour answer would mean soaring interest rates."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	I am glad that politicians should be so focused on the debt and deficit implications of public policy. But we need to make it systematic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~4/ecnHdfVga5M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 23:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15969 at http://www.adamsmith.org</guid>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/tax-spending/the-debt-and-deficit-cost-of-political-policies</feedburner:origLink></item>
  <item>
    <title>Monetary rules vs. central bank discretion</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~3/v5kOpr3UAlg/monetary-rules-vs-central-bank-discretion</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;On Monday I attended a conference in Copenhagen on monetary policy regime change with Lars Christensen of Danske Bank, Sam Bowman, research director here, Anthony J Evans, economics professor at ESCP Europe Business School, and Martin Ågerup, president of Danish liberal think-tank CEPOS, among others. The discussions raised a huge number of interesting ideas, among which was the question of rules vs. discretion in monetary policy. We all agreed that a rule-based system would be a major improvement on the existing system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~4/v5kOpr3UAlg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 09:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15971 at http://www.adamsmith.org</guid>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/economics/monetary-rules-vs-central-bank-discretion</feedburner:origLink></item>
  <item>
    <title>23 Things We're Telling You About Capitalism VIII</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~3/lBqQypqo0IY/23-things-were-telling-you-about-capitalism-viii</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;In our eighth chapter Chang tells us that as capital is, despite Marxist insistences, national in some manner therefore we should be nationalist about capital. Whether or not we allow Johnny Foreigner to come and invest in our pristine and national economy thus become a political question: the politicians should stroke their beards and ponder upon whether this specific capital is going to do the right thing in our specific economy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~4/lBqQypqo0IY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 06:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15972 at http://www.adamsmith.org</guid>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/economics/23-things-were-telling-you-about-capitalism-viii</feedburner:origLink></item>
  <item>
    <title>Oil price fixing – who the European Commission should question</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~3/-fxfFXShKhA/oil-price-fixing-%E2%80%93-who-the-european-commission-should-question</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" src="/sites/default/files/Leeds%20Petrol%20Prices.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Commission has launched an investigation into oil prices. They suspect that prices may have been artificially inflated in order to swindle motorists out of their cash.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adamsmithinstitute/~4/-fxfFXShKhA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15968 at http://www.adamsmith.org</guid>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/energy-environment/oil-price-fixing-%E2%80%93-who-the-european-commission-should-question</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>
