<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="https://publishpress.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Agniveer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://agniveer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://agniveer.com/</link>
	<description>In Pursuit of Satya</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on There is no caste-system in Vedas by Partha Sarathi Mishra		</title>
		<link>https://agniveer.com/caste-system/comment-page-3/#comment-72546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Partha Sarathi Mishra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agniveer.com/?p=888#comment-72546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://agniveer.com/caste-system/comment-page-3/#comment-26702&quot;&gt;Krishnarao&lt;/a&gt;.

Arya Namazis are NOT Hindus, neither they have anything to do with Vedas. They are product of colonial corruption with deep inferiority complex.

Dayanand was inspired by Christianity. He is not any  traditional Dharmacharya from any authentic sampradaya.

Don&#039;t comment on things which you know nothing about. Since you are not Hindu from any sampradaya, just these new-cultists brainwashed one, better keep quit.

Hindu Dharma is Varnashara dharma. Whether you call it caste by birth or not doesn&#039;t matter. Varna is always by birth. All traditional sampradaya agree on it. You are free to start  your own cult, and call it Dayanandism.

This fake Agniveer propaganda is another variant of arya samaj which only take Hindus away from Dharma.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://agniveer.com/caste-system/comment-page-3/#comment-26702">Krishnarao</a>.</p>
<p>Arya Namazis are NOT Hindus, neither they have anything to do with Vedas. They are product of colonial corruption with deep inferiority complex.</p>
<p>Dayanand was inspired by Christianity. He is not any  traditional Dharmacharya from any authentic sampradaya.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t comment on things which you know nothing about. Since you are not Hindu from any sampradaya, just these new-cultists brainwashed one, better keep quit.</p>
<p>Hindu Dharma is Varnashara dharma. Whether you call it caste by birth or not doesn&#8217;t matter. Varna is always by birth. All traditional sampradaya agree on it. You are free to start  your own cult, and call it Dayanandism.</p>
<p>This fake Agniveer propaganda is another variant of arya samaj which only take Hindus away from Dharma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How many mantras are there in Rigveda? by I_agree_with_you		</title>
		<link>https://agniveer.com/mantras-rigveda/comment-page-1/#comment-50219</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I_agree_with_you]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 23:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agniveer.com/?p=3953#comment-50219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hinduism
Are there any Variants in Samhita of Vedas?
Asked 5 years, 9 months ago
Modified 5 years, 8 months ago
Viewed 938 times

11


3
Does samhitas have any variants ? How many old copies do we have and do they match exactly or if not how do they differ.

scripture
vedas
Share
Improve this question
Follow
edited Oct 15, 2016 at 6:43
user avatar
Tezz
44.8k77 gold badges200200 silver badges295295 bronze badges
asked Oct 5, 2016 at 5:10
user avatar
Pythagorean Mystic
70166 silver badges1212 bronze badges
Related - hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/2628/… – 
SwiftPushkar
 Oct 5, 2016 at 5:26
I have checked that...i want more precise answer..i debate over internet with missionaries. – 
Pythagorean Mystic
 Oct 5, 2016 at 5:56
Add a comment
1 Answer
Sorted by:

Highest score (default)

16

Yes, Samhitas do have variants as per Shakha.

Originally as per Mahabhasya of Patanjali there were 21 Shakhas of RigVeda, 101 Shakhas of Yajurveda, 1000 Shakhas of SamaVeda and 9 Shakhas of Atharvaveda. Thus total 1138 Shakhas of total Vedas.

Now, we have only about 12 Shakhas of Four Vedas Surviving.

Only one Shakha of RigVeda called Shakala Shakha is alive. Another Shakha Baskala is uncertain.

Out of 1000 Shakhas of Samaveda only three Shakhas are surviving. Kauthuma Shakha, Jaiminiya Shakha and Rananiya Shakha.

Out of 9 Shakhas of Atharvaveda, only two are surviving; Paipplada Shakha and Shaunikiya Shakha.

Out of 101 Shakhas of Yajurveda only 6 are alive upto now. Shukla Yajurveda has two Surviving Shakhas called Kanva and Madhyandiya. And Krishna Yajurveda has four surviving Shakhas called Taittariya, Maitrayani, Kathaka and Kapisthala.

Each Shakha of Veda has one Samhita of its own, at least one Brahmana and one Aranyaka of each. As each Shakha has their own Samhita so we have lost more than 1126 Samhitas itself.

But Samhitas differ by little only. They are Very much similar. But still we have lost many parts of Samhitas itself.

Let&#039;s take example of Hymn called Sri Rudram, from Yajurveda. It is also called Sata Rudriya because it is found in all 101 Shakhas of YajurVeda.

Let&#039;s compare the verses of Sri Rudram from Taittariya Samhita, Vajasaneyi Samhita and Maitrayani Samhita:

4.5.1 to 4.5.11 of Taittariya Samhita is SataRudriya and it starts with:

नमस्ते रुद्र मन्यव उतोत इषवे नम:।
नमस्ते अस्तु धन्वने बाहुभ्यामुत ते नम:॥   १

namaste rudra manyava utota iṣave nama:।
namaste astu dhanvane bāhubhyāmuta te nama:॥

16th chapter of Vajasaneyi Samhita is SataRudriya and it starts with:

नमस्ते रुद्र मन्यव उतोत इषवे नम:। बाहुभ्यामुत ते नम:॥   १
namaste rudra manyava utota iṣave nama:। bāhubhyāmuta te nama:॥

2.9.2 of Maitrayani Samhita is the Satarudriya and the corrresponding verse is :

नमस्ते रुद्र मन्यव उतोत इषवे नम:।
नमस्ते अस्तु धन्वने बाहुभ्यामुत ते नम:॥  

namaste rudra manyava utota iṣave nama:।
namaste astu dhanvane bāhubhyāmuta te nama:॥

17th chapter of Kathaka Samhita is SataRudriya and it starts with:

नमस्ते रुद्र मन्यव बाहुभ्यामुत ते नम:। उतोत इषवे नम:।।
namaste rudra manyava bāhubhyāmuta te nama:। utota iṣave nama:।।

Thus we can see some minor variants above. There are also some major Variants like:

Taittariya Samhita verse 2 of Sri Rudram and Maitrayani Samhita also contains this verse:

यात इषुः शिवतमा शिवं बभूव ते धनुः ।
शिवा शरव्या या तव तया नो रुद्र मृडय ॥

yāta iṣuḥ śivatamā śivaṃ babhūva te dhanuḥ । śivā śaravyā yā tava tayā no rudra mṛḍaya ॥

However we do not find this verse in Vajasaneyi Samhita.

Similarly Maitrayani Samhita verse 54 of Sri Rudram contains this verse:

अघोरेभ्यो अथ घोरेभ्यो घोरघोरतरेभ्य ।
सर्वत शर्वशर्वेभ्यो नमस्ते रुद्ररुपेभ्यो नमः ।।

aghorebhyo atha ghorebhyo ghoraghoratarebhya ।
sarvata śarvaśarvebhyo namaste rudrarupebhyo namaḥ ।।

Actually this mantra is taken to the PanchaBrahmana mantras found in Taittariya Aranyaka and Mahanarayaniya with minor variations.

However we do not find this mantra in Vajasaneyi and Taittariya Samhita

Thus from above we can guess that other PanchaBrahmana mantras like Sadyojata mantras, Tatpurusha , Ishana mantras were also from Samhita parts. But they are not avaliable now as we have lost thousands of Shakhas.

Another example is 14.3 of Atharvaveda Paipplada Samhita is NilaRudra Upanishad or Nilarudriya. However we do not find NilaRudriya in Atharvaveda Shaunikiya Samhita.

Thus we have lost many texts of Samhitas itself.

The names of rivers mentioned could also be different in different shakhas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hinduism<br />
Are there any Variants in Samhita of Vedas?<br />
Asked 5 years, 9 months ago<br />
Modified 5 years, 8 months ago<br />
Viewed 938 times</p>
<p>11</p>
<p>3<br />
Does samhitas have any variants ? How many old copies do we have and do they match exactly or if not how do they differ.</p>
<p>scripture<br />
vedas<br />
Share<br />
Improve this question<br />
Follow<br />
edited Oct 15, 2016 at 6:43<br />
user avatar<br />
Tezz<br />
44.8k77 gold badges200200 silver badges295295 bronze badges<br />
asked Oct 5, 2016 at 5:10<br />
user avatar<br />
Pythagorean Mystic<br />
70166 silver badges1212 bronze badges<br />
Related &#8211; hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/2628/… –<br />
SwiftPushkar<br />
 Oct 5, 2016 at 5:26<br />
I have checked that&#8230;i want more precise answer..i debate over internet with missionaries. –<br />
Pythagorean Mystic<br />
 Oct 5, 2016 at 5:56<br />
Add a comment<br />
1 Answer<br />
Sorted by:</p>
<p>Highest score (default)</p>
<p>16</p>
<p>Yes, Samhitas do have variants as per Shakha.</p>
<p>Originally as per Mahabhasya of Patanjali there were 21 Shakhas of RigVeda, 101 Shakhas of Yajurveda, 1000 Shakhas of SamaVeda and 9 Shakhas of Atharvaveda. Thus total 1138 Shakhas of total Vedas.</p>
<p>Now, we have only about 12 Shakhas of Four Vedas Surviving.</p>
<p>Only one Shakha of RigVeda called Shakala Shakha is alive. Another Shakha Baskala is uncertain.</p>
<p>Out of 1000 Shakhas of Samaveda only three Shakhas are surviving. Kauthuma Shakha, Jaiminiya Shakha and Rananiya Shakha.</p>
<p>Out of 9 Shakhas of Atharvaveda, only two are surviving; Paipplada Shakha and Shaunikiya Shakha.</p>
<p>Out of 101 Shakhas of Yajurveda only 6 are alive upto now. Shukla Yajurveda has two Surviving Shakhas called Kanva and Madhyandiya. And Krishna Yajurveda has four surviving Shakhas called Taittariya, Maitrayani, Kathaka and Kapisthala.</p>
<p>Each Shakha of Veda has one Samhita of its own, at least one Brahmana and one Aranyaka of each. As each Shakha has their own Samhita so we have lost more than 1126 Samhitas itself.</p>
<p>But Samhitas differ by little only. They are Very much similar. But still we have lost many parts of Samhitas itself.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take example of Hymn called Sri Rudram, from Yajurveda. It is also called Sata Rudriya because it is found in all 101 Shakhas of YajurVeda.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s compare the verses of Sri Rudram from Taittariya Samhita, Vajasaneyi Samhita and Maitrayani Samhita:</p>
<p>4.5.1 to 4.5.11 of Taittariya Samhita is SataRudriya and it starts with:</p>
<p>नमस्ते रुद्र मन्यव उतोत इषवे नम:।<br />
नमस्ते अस्तु धन्वने बाहुभ्यामुत ते नम:॥   १</p>
<p>namaste rudra manyava utota iṣave nama:।<br />
namaste astu dhanvane bāhubhyāmuta te nama:॥</p>
<p>16th chapter of Vajasaneyi Samhita is SataRudriya and it starts with:</p>
<p>नमस्ते रुद्र मन्यव उतोत इषवे नम:। बाहुभ्यामुत ते नम:॥   १<br />
namaste rudra manyava utota iṣave nama:। bāhubhyāmuta te nama:॥</p>
<p>2.9.2 of Maitrayani Samhita is the Satarudriya and the corrresponding verse is :</p>
<p>नमस्ते रुद्र मन्यव उतोत इषवे नम:।<br />
नमस्ते अस्तु धन्वने बाहुभ्यामुत ते नम:॥  </p>
<p>namaste rudra manyava utota iṣave nama:।<br />
namaste astu dhanvane bāhubhyāmuta te nama:॥</p>
<p>17th chapter of Kathaka Samhita is SataRudriya and it starts with:</p>
<p>नमस्ते रुद्र मन्यव बाहुभ्यामुत ते नम:। उतोत इषवे नम:।।<br />
namaste rudra manyava bāhubhyāmuta te nama:। utota iṣave nama:।।</p>
<p>Thus we can see some minor variants above. There are also some major Variants like:</p>
<p>Taittariya Samhita verse 2 of Sri Rudram and Maitrayani Samhita also contains this verse:</p>
<p>यात इषुः शिवतमा शिवं बभूव ते धनुः ।<br />
शिवा शरव्या या तव तया नो रुद्र मृडय ॥</p>
<p>yāta iṣuḥ śivatamā śivaṃ babhūva te dhanuḥ । śivā śaravyā yā tava tayā no rudra mṛḍaya ॥</p>
<p>However we do not find this verse in Vajasaneyi Samhita.</p>
<p>Similarly Maitrayani Samhita verse 54 of Sri Rudram contains this verse:</p>
<p>अघोरेभ्यो अथ घोरेभ्यो घोरघोरतरेभ्य ।<br />
सर्वत शर्वशर्वेभ्यो नमस्ते रुद्ररुपेभ्यो नमः ।।</p>
<p>aghorebhyo atha ghorebhyo ghoraghoratarebhya ।<br />
sarvata śarvaśarvebhyo namaste rudrarupebhyo namaḥ ।।</p>
<p>Actually this mantra is taken to the PanchaBrahmana mantras found in Taittariya Aranyaka and Mahanarayaniya with minor variations.</p>
<p>However we do not find this mantra in Vajasaneyi and Taittariya Samhita</p>
<p>Thus from above we can guess that other PanchaBrahmana mantras like Sadyojata mantras, Tatpurusha , Ishana mantras were also from Samhita parts. But they are not avaliable now as we have lost thousands of Shakhas.</p>
<p>Another example is 14.3 of Atharvaveda Paipplada Samhita is NilaRudra Upanishad or Nilarudriya. However we do not find NilaRudriya in Atharvaveda Shaunikiya Samhita.</p>
<p>Thus we have lost many texts of Samhitas itself.</p>
<p>The names of rivers mentioned could also be different in different shakhas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on No textual corruption in Vedas by Lanchi		</title>
		<link>https://agniveer.com/no-textual-corruption-in-vedas/comment-page-2/#comment-50204</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lanchi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 19:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agniveer.com/?p=2697#comment-50204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sir I have a humble request to please visit sites like - scroll.in, Wikipedia, Quora and world history encyclopaedia. They are filled with false translations and it&#039;s defaming us Hindus also some youtubers are also doing this please sir do something.<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f64f-1f3fb.png" alt="🙏🏻" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir I have a humble request to please visit sites like &#8211; scroll.in, Wikipedia, Quora and world history encyclopaedia. They are filled with false translations and it&#8217;s defaming us Hindus also some youtubers are also doing this please sir do something.🙏🏻</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Resume Design guidelines 3 by Agniveer Job		</title>
		<link>https://agniveer.com/resume-dream-3/comment-page-1/#comment-50168</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agniveer Job]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 07:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agniveer.com/?p=5606#comment-50168</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[nice and useful article.And more on that,nice site.I just loved the whole of it-right from the name of the website and all posts.good way of exchanging thoughts.I will surely like to check it out regularly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice and useful article.And more on that,nice site.I just loved the whole of it-right from the name of the website and all posts.good way of exchanging thoughts.I will surely like to check it out regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Manu Smriti and Women by Jayesh		</title>
		<link>https://agniveer.com/manu-smriti-and-women/comment-page-2/#comment-49945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2022 04:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agniveer.com/?p=4276#comment-49945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A lot of time on discussion people quote chapter 5 verse 154.  Please enlighten me]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of time on discussion people quote chapter 5 verse 154.  Please enlighten me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on વેદ વિષે આટલું જરૂરથી જાણો! &#8211; ભાગ ૧ by Kalpana Pathak		</title>
		<link>https://agniveer.com/must-known-facts-facts-about-vedas-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-49325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalpana Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agniveer.com/?p=66433#comment-49325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[સરસ સત્ય લેખન.
આભાર આપનો.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>સરસ સત્ય લેખન.<br />
આભાર આપનો.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Lets learn Vedic Worship &#8211; True Hinduism by Rehan Ahmad		</title>
		<link>https://agniveer.com/vedic-worship-hinduism/comment-page-1/#comment-49082</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rehan Ahmad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agniveer.com/?p=2715#comment-49082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sir! 
I visit and read your website .
Request to add the option of print which opens the preview and either we can send to the printer or save as pdf. That will be great to have..
Thanks
Rehan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir!<br />
I visit and read your website .<br />
Request to add the option of print which opens the preview and either we can send to the printer or save as pdf. That will be great to have..<br />
Thanks<br />
Rehan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Learn Tamil Alphabets – Part 2 (Consonants) by दी		</title>
		<link>https://agniveer.com/learn-tamil-alphabets-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-48837</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[दी]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 07:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agniveer.com/?p=66108#comment-48837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It’s crazy..but it’s fun when u explain it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s crazy..but it’s fun when u explain it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Taj Mahal is a Shiva Temple &#8211; 100 evidences (Part 2) by Srinivas Rao Varanasi		</title>
		<link>https://agniveer.com/taj-mahal-shiva-temple-100-evidences-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-48602</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srinivas Rao Varanasi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2022 06:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agniveer.com/?p=37343#comment-48602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For more scientific evidence we need the opening up of vaults underneath and to check every corner, carbon dating, scanning, and lot of other methods.
Court&#039;s should allow all this to happen..which they are not currently. 
So please join us in this efforts
Don&#039;t come here for your anti hindu ranting. 
now that you shown interest to know the truth will you now ask for opening up of chambers and ASI check and carbon dating. 
Hope you will if you are not a hypocrite.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more scientific evidence we need the opening up of vaults underneath and to check every corner, carbon dating, scanning, and lot of other methods.<br />
Court&#8217;s should allow all this to happen..which they are not currently.<br />
So please join us in this efforts<br />
Don&#8217;t come here for your anti hindu ranting.<br />
now that you shown interest to know the truth will you now ask for opening up of chambers and ASI check and carbon dating.<br />
Hope you will if you are not a hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Is Purush Sukta of Vedas casteist? by Megha Garg		</title>
		<link>https://agniveer.com/vedas-caste-discrimination/comment-page-3/#comment-45895</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Megha Garg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agniveer.com/?p=5276#comment-45895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://agniveer.com/vedas-caste-discrimination/comment-page-3/#comment-38212&quot;&gt;cutie&lt;/a&gt;.

Such a nice answer!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://agniveer.com/vedas-caste-discrimination/comment-page-3/#comment-38212">cutie</a>.</p>
<p>Such a nice answer!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
