Skunk odor

December 27th, 2011

Just before I fall asleep, I often scan the news on USA Today via my cell phone app. The other night, I came across this article, which talks about how there is a growing contingent of people who, when it comes to religion, are declaring themselves as “So what’s” or “None’s” or as being “spiritually apathetic”. There are a number of interesting viewpoints in the article. Here’s one:

“The only thing I’m pushy about is I don’t want to be pushed. I don’t want to change others and I don’t want to debate my view”

My view is that this viewpoint is likely the end of a cause-and-effect loop. Organized religion has been so institutionalized, so “shove it down your throat”, so corrupt and political, for so long, that it’s now getting its just deserved through a loss of membership and an increase of apathy towards the very issues that it’s so fervent about. These behaviors by such organizations stink like a skunk, and nobody wants to be near them. A skunk has about a 15 foot odor radius, so you don’t need to be right next to one in order to be impacted by its horrid spray of stink. I think these people perceive all organized religion as being within the radius, they don’t want to be sprayed, and they give it a wide berth. Of course, not all organized religion is skunky, but for these folks, knowing it’s anywhere nearby causes them to flee.

The Christian religions don’t help themselves very much in this area. They say some things that I think people perceive as skunky. Another example in the article:

“If you’re not worried about heaven, you won’t notice or care if Jesus is essential your salvation. You’re not thinking about any consequences”

Pee-yew. Worrying about heaven doesn’t help you. Vicarious atonement (i.e. salvation), through Jesus or otherwise, doesn’t help you. Thinking about consequences might help you, but not through something as juvenile and externalized as the fear of not-going to heaven or the fear of not-being saved by Jesus. I think statements like these are perceived to be on the very edge of the 15 foot stink-radius. Step in any closer, and you’ll get stronger versions of the same thing that stink a whole lot more. So people run away.

Based on the article, it sounds like the term “God” has picked up some of the same skunk odor that religion has. It is common for people to define God as an all-powerful authoritarian figure, typically male, who tells you what’s good and what’s not. I would say that this definition is a skunk for the “So what’s” and the “None’s”. Perhaps they believe in some form of God, but whatever it is, it’s not based on this common definition. So when asked, it’s easier to say they don’t believe in God.

I watched Eat Pray Love yesterday, and if you’ve seen it, you know about being in search of a word, and the importance of having a word. I think our culture is in search of a word. Two words, perhaps. One for God, another for religion. Both of which cannot and do not have any skunk odor attached to them, none whatsoever. But finding these words would mean that we have to to stop rummaging about in the West, turn ourselves around, and look East.

Bookmark and Share

Trying to be legit

December 11th, 2011

Making a business out of providing readings on a mass-produced level via a call center has met with many problems, the biggest of which is fakery. Years ago in the US, we had Miss Cleo. I remember not being able to watch tv without seeing her commercials popping up on nearly every channel, and then sometime later, heard that she was discovered to be fake, right down to the Jamaican accent. Undoubtedly, other countries have their share of deceptive/fake/deceitful “psychics” too.

In my conversations with the spirit folks over the years, I’ve learned that they especially detest those who use mediumship and/or psychic abilities to lie, cheat, deceive, hurt, or otherwise take advantage of people. During the conversation, they showed me something that conveyed “hunt down and kill” very succinctly. They never do stuff like that, so I know that yes-indeed, they’re very serious about it.

In Scotland, a medium who has had enough of people faking it and exploiting others for money is trying to build a legitimate call center business for  message work/readings. He puts candidates through a number of tests to be sure that they have a good connection to the spirits. So far, he has ten folks.

I’m not a fan of such endeavors, but I’d say he has a positive attitude, and based on that, I hope he succeeds. It would bring a candlelight of legitimacy to an area that has been pitch black with lies and deceit.

Bookmark and Share

mediumship as tv genre

November 27th, 2011

The cable tv we had at our old house was pretty basic, as we didn’t watch much. But I moved to a new house recently, and got more channels on my cable tv along with it. It took me about an hour (no exaggerating) to go through all the channels and mark the ones we might watch as favorites. I’m watching more often these days, and as I flip through the favorites, I am surprised to discover how many shows there are that relate to spiritual phenomena. There are shows about haunted houses, haunted places, orbs and photography, ghost hunters, other shows that have a psychic or spiritual component to them, and a new one that seems the closest to mediumship as a Spiritualist would see it, which is Long Island Medium. It seems that it has grown from the occasional show here-and-there to a valid genre of it’s own. Not as prominent as detective shows or sitcoms, but a genre nonetheless.

It’s the growth that surprises me. I’m not sure what to make of it. Perhaps it’s good because viewers are getting more and more opportunities to hear about spirit communication. Perhaps it’s not good, because the viewer’s opportunities may be featuring the scary and/or negative side as a means to draw an audience. And the opportunities may be coming via those who I would say are the blind leading the blind.

Nonetheless, it is what it is for now, and time will eventually show how it works out.

Speaking of time, it’s time to send my prayers out to all those who are the blind and are following the blind. Prayers that their exposure and learning about mediumship is a positive and beneficial experience, as opposed to a negative or “I like to be scared and here’s another way to be scared” experience.

I hope you send prayers out for them too.

Bookmark and Share

Missed the boat

November 5th, 2011

Here’s a short article about Mary Hooper, who wrote a novel entitled Velvet. She set it in Victorian London during the “height of the spiritualist craze”, and one of her characters is a medium. Like most writers would do, she researched mediumship. Based on the article, it looks like she spent most of her time with ectoplasm. She said that she “saw a selection of rather ludicrous photographs showing something which purported to be it, coming from a medium’s nose or mouth.” There are indeed a number of photographs out there that are purported to show ectoplasm, and I agree, many/most of them are not ectoplasm at all.

Bad or fake photography does not prove that ectoplasm is fake. But it doesn’t matter, really. To be honest, I don’t think that ectoplasm is important at all. People get so obsessed with physical manifestations such as ectoplasm and the like. I think it’s because they have faith in the tangible and “solid”, something that they can show others, point to and say “see … here it is!”

I think displays of knowledge and intelligence, based on experience, are much more valuable and interesting. When a medium tells you something only you and the spirit person know of … now that’s interesting. When your loved ones in the spirit world give you a message that is unmistakably characteristic of their personality, and touches you in a profound way … that’s interesting. When you learn a life lesson from the spirit people, and grow because of it … that’s interesting too. Ectoplasm, orbs, and other physical manifestations may be “true” in some cases, but all of it pales in comparison to experience – that which touches the heart, the mind, the spirit!

When you’re looking for something in the wrong place, you won’t find it. Even if you’re looking for the right thing, when you’re in the wrong place, you won’t find it, because it’s not there … it’s the wrong place.

The last line of the article is particularly sad. She missed the boat. It sailed away and she never even knew it was there, because she was looking in the wrong place.

Bookmark and Share

Prejudiced

October 22nd, 2011

I try to avoid being prejudiced whenever possible. But there are times when it just doesn’t seem to be avoidable. And this is one of those times.

There is a new movie coming out, which is premiering today, called Cassadaga. Here is the synopsis of it, which is from the official trailer site:

Devastated by the death of her younger sister, Lily Morel seeks solace at the spiritualist community of Cassadaga. But instead of finding closure, she contacts something else — the vengeful ghost of a murdered young woman. With her life crumbling all-around her, Lily races to unravel the mysterious circumstances surrounding the woman’s death — a task that will bring her face-to-face with a sadistic serial killer known only as “Geppetto”.

If you’re not already aware, Lily Dale is the capital of Spiritualism in the United States, and is located in Cassadaga, NY. That factoid should clear up the references in the movie for you. If you haven’t been before, it’s one of the most peaceful places on the planet. Quite the contradiction for horror film folks.

From the point of view of mediumship and spirituality, I can’t help but be prejudiced about  it. I cannot see how a movie like this will do us any good. Yes-I-know, people get a visceral thrill out of being scared, especially around Halloween, but my view is that horror is not good for you to begin with, and a steady diet of it is harmful to your spiritual/emotional/mental functioning. The average person probably thinks I’m crazy, but my contention is that our psyches are much more sensitive than we are consciously aware of, and immersing ourselves in such things has negative effects on us, whether we’re consciously aware of them or not.

I wish it was a movie with a positive message around it like Ghost, Field of Dreams, What Dreams May Come, or a number of others. Be that as it may, freedom of expression (at least in the US) is pretty much a right. So movies like this are part of the landscape. I respect the rights of others to create such things, whether I like them or not.

There is one positive thing I’d like to say. I’d like to say thank-you to the director and writers of the movie for being respectful enough to avoid using  “Lily Dale” directly, and using character and location references instead. I really appreciate it.

Bookmark and Share

Selling Tools

September 26th, 2011

Here is an article from CNN that is written about spirits who recently passed and then appeared to their Earth plane friends. The spirits appeared before the friends knew anything of their passing.  If you like to read such accounts, I think you’ll find it a little long but interesting.

I work in the software business, and my job involves helping our customers sell software. I am well used to working with a number of things that are collectively called selling tools, such as customer-facing presentations, a value proposition and an elevator pitch. A value proposition is a statement of what the value of the software is and why you would want to buy it, and an elevator pitch is what you would say when describing the software (and the value) to a complete stranger during a 30-second elevator ride. Success stories are another selling tool. Success stories are exactly what they sound like – stories where a customer had some type of business problem, employed the software, and got positive results. For the purpose of clarity, I should make it clear that what I’m referring to as selling is not negative, manipulative, or high-pressure. The same applies to selling tools.

If you wanted to sell someone the idea of mediumship, or at least life after death, you might use this article as a selling tool, as it contains a number of success stories. Note that calling it a selling tool does not cheapen, or take anything away from the value of the article.

If you have prospects in your life who aren’t sure about mediumship and/or life after death, you might want to hand them this article to get them thinking. It’ll probably take a whole lot more than an article for them to change their minds, but that’s to be expected. What really changes one’s mind is personal experience, and that depends on the spirits, most of the time.  And of course, this not something you sell in the first place. Spiritualism has been called a religion of conviction, not conversion, and that couldn’t be more true for the religion as well as mediumship and life after death.

Bookmark and Share

Different than what you would expect

September 11th, 2011

As a medium, you have a different relationship to the spirits than most people. It’s like you have a connection that’s always available between yourself and the spirits.  Not that the connection is always busy or anything, but it’s just there. The comparison they make is that it’s like when leave your email software running on your PC while you are doing other things on it. Since it’s always running, you could get mail at any time (or send one for that matter), but that doesn’t mean that it’s constantly busy. Just a connection.

A little more than a year ago, I suddenly started to paint. I hadn’t done anything since grade-school, and I wasn’t good at it then, so my current art work is pretty grade-school. But no matter, because it’s fun to do, and that’s the main point. Some friends asked me to post some of it, and after I did, one of them asked me if I could do something on the 9/11 tragedy. I didn’t say much about it, but went out and did a bunch of research. I learned about the Trade Center buildings, the construction, the devastation, the conspiracy theories, all kinds of things. I looked at a lot of pictures, and now I can name several buildings around the towers at a quick glance. I discovered that there was an itty-bitty little church in front of the towers which was built long ago and perished in the disaster.

Somewhere in the middle of all this learning and research, I got something in my “inbox” about events such as 9/11. It said that events such as these happen the way they do for a reason, they teach lessons. All the people involved died the way they were supposed to, and all was accounted for. I replied back, asking what the lessons were, but got a bounce message in return. That happens sometimes; you discover that the “email” in your inbox is valid and isn’t spam, but it just doesn’t have a from-address that works. I got another note instead, that the people whom we call victims, when looked at from the grander perspective that the spirits have, are actually volunteers. They volunteered.

I’ve heard of this type of thing before, but it still blows my mind to hear it again. I can’t imagine sitting somewhere in the spirit worlds and deciding that I’m going to incarnate on the Earth for a bit and have my life end that way, because there’s some value in doing so, and it’s only one life of many. Pretty interesting to think about. Certainly nothing that most of us here on the Earth plane would consider as a good way, or even the best way to do things. I can’t imagine volunteering for such a thing, and have high regard and respect for those who have done so. My understanding is that the goal was for us to learn and grow; I dearly hope that their “volunteer work” was successful in that regard, and we have learned the things from it that we should.

So I went about my research, then went to paint. I use acrylic paint (which is water based) on canvas panels. I painted one picture, and it came out, well, “ok”. Every time I go to paint, it’s an experiment of some kind. This one was an experiment with using pencil to block-in the buildings and things before using the paint. It was all right, but doubt I’ll use pencil for that again, as it bleeds through, particularly on lighter colors. I got an oil paint starter kit for my birthday earlier in the year, and decided it was time to experiment with it before trying another 9/11 scene. I tried a couple of landscapes with it, as I’ve watched Bob Ross, a master of landscapes in oil, do so many times on his show. Working with the paint and trying some of his technique, I could see the value of it, but in the end, I hated working with it. It’s like painting with peanut butter, the clean up requires thinner instead of water, and a painting takes many days to dry. I made a decision to not work with oil. Suddenly I got a note in my inbox, saying that the decision I made would not shorten my life span. It went on to say that life is X amount of time to start with, and if I had decided to work with oils for the rest of my life, my life would be then be shorter than X by some amount of time because of the choice I made.

The chemicals in thinner, and probably in the paint as well, aren’t good for you with prolonged exposure, and a lifetime of working with it would be exactly that – prolonged exposure. I went on to think about Bob Ross. On one of his shows, he said he painted 20,000-30,000 paintings. He also died young, at 53, of cancer. I’m no doctor, but I would say that prolonged exposure to paint thinner probably caused his cancer. Bob has done more to interest people in doing art work more than anyone else probably ever has. I replied back, asking about whether Bob volunteered to incarnate and have a shorter life due to the oils because the value of  getting interesting people in art was worth it. I didn’t get a reply, but I’m not surprised. If I could answer the question for him, I would say yes, I wouldn’t be surprised if he did.

One never really knows why people choose the Earth planes lives they do. Whether it’s as emotionally charged as being an 9/11 victim or as neutral as being a master of painting landscapes in oil, it’s interesting to think about, and to be appreciative of what these people have done.

Bookmark and Share

Variations on a theme

August 14th, 2011

People sometimes ask what mediumship is like for the medium, i.e. how they perceive spirits. On this forum, bluebird asks it well by saying “When you actually see spirits , how do they appear to you? Are you actually able to see some sort of manifestation? or is it more like in your minds eye?”

Mediumship is a most personal endeavor for the medium. The spirits work with each individual medium in their own way. Beginning mediums often fail to acknowledge the impact of this. They tend to look for certain things they think they should get, or think they should get, and at the same time, tend to overlook the things that they do get, either ignoring them, dismissing them, thinking it’s weird, or thinking it’s just their imagination. It’s important to pay attention to what you’re getting and how it is working for you, and to develop along those lines.

If you gathered a bunch of us together and had each medium respond to that question individually, I would bet that you’d find a lot of variation. The comments on the forum link above gives you a flavor of some of the variations. I’ve heard some mediums say it’s like a movie running past them at high speed, others say it’s a certain feeling they get, and others perceive things that are unusual for most mediums on a regular basis, such as smells and tastes.

Having said that, I think that you would also be able to filter it down into some common themes. Those themes are what I call “the clairs” – clairaudience, clairsentience, and clairvoyance. “Clair” in French means clear, so you have clear hearing, clear feeling, and clear seeing. I would say that for the most part, these themes happen in the mind’s eye. Most people would leave it at that, but on the forum, True Angel asked what “mind’s eye” really means. Interesting question. My response is that the answer is  more dependent on the person asking the question, than anything else. I would ask them how much imagination they have. I would ask them to use their imagination to conjure something up. I would ask them to include sound, things they could feel, and things they could see. If they can get that far, I would then say that they now know what the mind’s eye is, because they just used it to conjure up whatever they created. From a mediumship perspective, the difference is that the spirits put things into your mind’s eye/ear/feeling as a means of communication, as opposed to you building something and putting it there yourself.

Note how experience-dependent the “answer” is. Also note how individualized the answer is. I like questions whose answers depend more on the questioner than the source of the answer.

Bookmark and Share

Message casting

July 27th, 2011

We went to Lily Dale recently with some friends of ours, and my parents. I was looking forward to it because our friends have never been to Lily Dale before, they weren’t very familiar with Spiritualism, and I enjoy helping people understand what it’s all about. From Rochester, we met our friends in Buffalo, and went from there. The weather was comfortably warm, and somehow avoided the blazing sun and searing heat that’s been gripping the Northeast of the country for some time now.

I pay attention to energy and vibration most everywhere I go, and am certainly aware of it when going to a place such as Lily Dale. When we got there, I noticed something missing right away. I felt ok, solid, good so-to-speak, but I wasn’t feeling that raised vibration that I normally feel whenever I’m there. I thought about it, and figured that there may be other reasons for it. I had just come back from a 3-day trip to the West coast, had a haircut at 7:30 am that morning, then drove to Buffalo, where we car pooled to Lily Dale. My jet lag was minimal, and I’m used to being up early, so a 7:30 appointment wasn’t a big deal. I figured that these things shouldn’t have too much effect, but set the question aside for the time being.

After lunch, we went to the stump for the message service. If you’ve never been, it’s an outdoor venue in the middle of the Leolyn woods. It’s beautiful. Very inspirational. I haven’t been there in a few years, and immediately noticed the additional benches and a microphone set up, which was smart. We got there early, so it was easy to get a seat, and it filled up rapidly.

When the message work began, I noticed that a few working mediums were giving out material without direction, and expecting the audience to step up and claim it. For example, a medium might say that they have an elderly woman who always wore red shoes and passed from a heart condition, and they asked the audience if anyone could relate to it. Once someone claimed it, the medium might ask a question or two about who the spirit was to the recipient of the message (the seeker), and then go on from there. The material coming out was pretty bland, generic, and not particularly evidential – it sounded like anyone could have said it. I was shocked.

My friends picked up on the blandness of the material right away. I told them that I agreed with them, and how surprised I was. I explained that the lack of direction for the intended recipient was bad form, like a left handed handshake, or a limp one. One of my friends questioned why everything was so positive, and why was it that no one seemed to be missing anyone, i.e. why wasn’t there any messages indicating that spirits (or Earth plane people) were missing each other. I explained that messages are generally too public to have a bunch of detail, and things could be different in a reading. Later on, we went to a different service, which was much better, and I told my friends that it was more representative of Spiritualism and Lily Dale in general.

As I write this morning, I am still shocked. To my knowledge, there is no word to describe the giving out of message material and expecting someone in the audience to claim it as the recipient of the message, so I’m coining one – message casting. As the medium, you’re casting out the message, like the lure on the end of your fishing line being thrown into the pond, and waiting to see who bites. I’ve seen a little bit of message casting here and there over the years, but nothing as blatant as I saw that day. The problem with message casting is four-fold. To the experienced, it’s bad form. To the skeptical, it’s very questionable. To the cynical, it’s easy pickings. Finally, and perhaps worst of all, it doesn’t necessarily reflect on the quality of the message work. You could receive a perfectly valid message that was delivered via message casting, but it may not received as such, and won’t look as valid to everyone else, simply because the form is bad!

A few more analogies and comparisons to bad form come to mind. Double dipping. Farting in church. Getting picked up to go to your wedding in a garbage truck instead of a limo. Taking your bread out of the grocery bag to find it miserably crushed. I’m sure you could come up with a few more.

When it comes to mediumship, the medium has a considerable say in how things go, what the process of working together will be like. It is (and should be) a partnership between the medium and the spirits, not merely a one-way type of thing. There are only a few things that I’m a stickler about, and directing the message to the seeker is definitely one of them. Now, I have seen mediums hit the person next to the intended seeker, for example, but that’s not a huge deal, and it is not what I’m talking about. When the spirits want to talk to somebody on the Earth plane, they damned well better know who they want to talk with, and I’m not about to put up with message casting to find out! I don’t like it, it’s bad form, and I’m not about to accept it. If they can’t direct me to the seeker so that I can provide the message, they shouldn’t be working through me. Find another medium instead. Better yet, don’t find a medium, and forget about giving a message to the seeker, because it’s not we can’t have good message work look bad because of a delivery issue at the spirit end.

There are two elements of this that I find most disturbing. First, that these mediums have been taught. All mediums are taught in one way or another, that’s normal, but taught like this? It’s like looking at someone’s kids in dismay and asking yourself why they were brought up that way. Second, that this was in Lily Dale.  Not just any old Spiritualist church (not that there’s a ton of them), but Lily Dale. I expect more than this.

To those of you who are teaching mediumship development classes – if you teach, allow, or condone message casting, and don’t teach your students to have the spirits direct them to the seeker without ambiguity, you are hurting us. You are hurting the student, you are hurting the perceived quality of the message, and you are opening the door to the cynics who will tear you and/or your students up over it, and unfortunately, the cynics will be in the right.

To the mediums who work via message casting – stop this practice. Stop it NOW. Send the thought out that you will no longer work this way, that you expect the spirits to direct you to the seeker, and if they can’t do that, then you don’t want them to work with you. Ask them to direct you to the seeker without ambiguity. Send these thoughts out on more than one occasion. Have the courage to do this, and do not fear that the spirits will abandon you. It’s doubtful that they will, and if they happen to, it’s no great loss, because they don’t get the message, pun intended. Don’t worry, you’ll get other spirit folks instead, presumably better ones.

Whew! OK. I’m down now. I’ve come off of the soap box. Those last two paragraphs made me feel like I was Dear Abby or Ann Landers or something. Or maybe a Dear Abby or Ann Landers with a lot more rant.

…. <sigh>…..

Rant or not, I do hope it changes someone’s behavior in the world at large, and makes mediumship just a little better. We really need good quality message work.

Bookmark and Share

History of the Ouija board

July 15th, 2011

Here’s a nice video on the history of the Ouija board. In six minutes, you’ll have a good idea of how it became popular in America.

Bookmark and Share