<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Analogism</title>
	
	<link>http://www.analogism.org</link>
	<description>Your Tech Feed. Speak Geek.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:39:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/analogism-comments" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="analogism-comments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Nokia 5800 Xpress Music to kill iPhone? by News - AFTONBLADET by Aftonbladet Apple for iPhone, iPod Touch &amp; iPad Apps</title>
		<link>http://www.analogism.org/2008/10/nokia-5800-xpress-music-to-kill-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-12940</link>
		<dc:creator>News - AFTONBLADET by Aftonbladet Apple for iPhone, iPod Touch &amp; iPad Apps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.analogism.org/?p=631#comment-12940</guid>
		<description>[...] 03 Dec 2008 www.analogism.org  Nokia 5800 Xpress Music to kill iPhone? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 03 Dec 2008 <a href="http://www.analogism.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.analogism.org</a>  Nokia 5800 Xpress Music to kill iPhone? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on T-Mobile G1 by HTC featuring Android by Google by normam</title>
		<link>http://www.analogism.org/2008/09/t-mobile-g1-by-htc-featuring-android-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-11254</link>
		<dc:creator>normam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.analogism.org/?p=545#comment-11254</guid>
		<description>HThe t-mobile G1 is great but the lack of not having a fltiash player makes this phone sucks.Please come up with and apm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HThe t-mobile G1 is great but the lack of not having a fltiash player makes this phone sucks.Please come up with and apm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ZAGG invisibleSHIELD vs. BodyGuardz (And how to install/apply on iPhone 3G) by Jesper Garneij</title>
		<link>http://www.analogism.org/2009/01/zagg-invisibleshield-vs-bodyguardz-and-how-to-installapply-on-iphone-3g/comment-page-1/#comment-8564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper Garneij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.analogism.org/?p=1120#comment-8564</guid>
		<description>@Tann,

Good tip, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tann,</p>
<p>Good tip, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ZAGG invisibleSHIELD vs. BodyGuardz (And how to install/apply on iPhone 3G) by Tann</title>
		<link>http://www.analogism.org/2009/01/zagg-invisibleshield-vs-bodyguardz-and-how-to-installapply-on-iphone-3g/comment-page-1/#comment-8560</link>
		<dc:creator>Tann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.analogism.org/?p=1120#comment-8560</guid>
		<description>A bloke at the office recommended a &lt;a href="http://www.gadgetshieldz.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;gadgetshieldz.com&lt;/a&gt; protector for my new cell, I got it for under $6 US and the shipping was free...you won't hear me complain about that package, this just feels too expensive at around $25.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bloke at the office recommended a <a href="http://www.gadgetshieldz.com" rel="nofollow">gadgetshieldz.com</a> protector for my new cell, I got it for under $6 US and the shipping was free&#8230;you won&#8217;t hear me complain about that package, this just feels too expensive at around $25.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Link to a specific time in a YouTube video by YouTube particular time link</title>
		<link>http://www.analogism.org/2008/10/link-to-a-specific-time-in-a-youtube-video/comment-page-1/#comment-3085</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube particular time link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.analogism.org/?p=790#comment-3085</guid>
		<description>[...]   I found another source: Link to a specific time in a YouTube video *</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   I found another source: Link to a specific time in a YouTube video *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The return of the iPhone 3G by ZAGG invisibleSHIELD vs. BodyGuardz (And how to install/apply on iPhone 3G)  »  Analogism</title>
		<link>http://www.analogism.org/2009/01/the-return-of-the-iphone-3g/comment-page-1/#comment-2843</link>
		<dc:creator>ZAGG invisibleSHIELD vs. BodyGuardz (And how to install/apply on iPhone 3G)  »  Analogism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.analogism.org/?p=1094#comment-2843</guid>
		<description>[...] plan was always to purchase some sort of protection for my iPhone 3G, and when I noticed how my first iPhone 3G was scratched, if ever so little, even though I took great care of it, I was on a mission during my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plan was always to purchase some sort of protection for my iPhone 3G, and when I noticed how my first iPhone 3G was scratched, if ever so little, even though I took great care of it, I was on a mission during my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nokia 5800 Xpress Music to kill iPhone? by News - AFTONBLADET by Aftonbladet iPhone App Store Review by StoredApps.com</title>
		<link>http://www.analogism.org/2008/10/nokia-5800-xpress-music-to-kill-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>News - AFTONBLADET by Aftonbladet iPhone App Store Review by StoredApps.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.analogism.org/?p=631#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>[...] 03 Dec 2008 www.analogism.org  Nokia 5800 Xpress Music to kill iPhone? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 03 Dec 2008 <a href="http://www.analogism.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.analogism.org</a>  Nokia 5800 Xpress Music to kill iPhone? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Telia testing out 100Mbit ADSL broadband by Telia building 4G network in Stockholm for mobile broadband</title>
		<link>http://www.analogism.org/2008/12/telia-testing-out-100mbit-adsl-broadband/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>Telia building 4G network in Stockholm for mobile broadband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.analogism.org/?p=1079#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>[...] will be delivering it to high population density areas only, which exclude me. Like I covered in an earlier article about Telia, I can’t even get 3G reception in my house, nor my summer house. Seems I’m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will be delivering it to high population density areas only, which exclude me. Like I covered in an earlier article about Telia, I can&#8217;t even get 3G reception in my house, nor my summer house. Seems I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple Mac Mini – What’s really going on? by Apple pulls out of Macworld, Steve Jobs not coming. What about the gadgets?</title>
		<link>http://www.analogism.org/2008/11/apple-mac-mini-whats-really-going-on/comment-page-1/#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple pulls out of Macworld, Steve Jobs not coming. What about the gadgets?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.analogism.org/?p=888#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>[...] the party at then? There are so many rumors out there now, an upgrade for the Mac Mini which I wrote about not long ago (some speculative specs), iPhone Nano, which you have to admit would be cool beans and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the party at then? There are so many rumors out there now, an upgrade for the Mac Mini which I wrote about not long ago (some speculative specs), iPhone Nano, which you have to admit would be cool beans and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-Touch by N-Trig on Windows 7 – Not so impressive… Yet. by JP</title>
		<link>http://www.analogism.org/2008/11/multi-touch-by-n-trig-on-windows-7-not-so-impressive-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.analogism.org/?p=875#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>Microsoft hopefully realises that beyond the initial novelty factor, business and other power users will be persuaded to adopt the MultiTouch paradigm for desktops and laptops only if it is comprehensively more efficient &amp; ergonomic than using a mouse or conventional touchpad. Hotkeys reduce some of the inefficiency of alternation between keyboard and mouse but the current cursor-menu option-click paradigm requires laptop touchpads significant finger motion &amp; precision.

Surfing the net, I noticed that FingerWorks has created both the hardware &amp; software that maximises MultiTouch to truly revolutionise the user interface. Their touchpad-based systems' ergonomic sophistication dispense with the need for either mouse or touchscreen, and should minimise the incidences of both repetitive strain injury &amp; complaints of smudged screens.

Ideally, Windows 7 should have a sufficiently varied repertoire of MultiTouch gestures to enable the user to perform most tasks within each programme in Microsoft Office that currently require accurately moving the cursor across screens &amp; zigzagging into specific submenus. In Microsoft Word and Excel, for example, file, edit, formatting, view and data tasks should have gestures that obviate the need to use a mouse. Note that FingerWorks offered products that would even allow the user to configure their own gesture-based Macros! Further, hardware manufacturers should consider facilities to allow MultiTouch gestures based on TouchPads (with appropriate controls to suppress input from inadvertent touches during typing), or else there will be cases of arm strain from touchScreen use!

At the minimum, WIndows 7 will hopefully provide a touchScreen interface that overcomes the human finger's inherent inaccuracy. IMHO, this could be either 1) automagnification of any area of the screen that is touched, akin to the way the Mac OS X Dock responds to a cursor, or 2) a "fingercot" which graphically translates touch into a contextually intelligent cursor and allows at least 3 multitouch gestures representing left-, right- and double-clicking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft hopefully realises that beyond the initial novelty factor, business and other power users will be persuaded to adopt the MultiTouch paradigm for desktops and laptops only if it is comprehensively more efficient &amp; ergonomic than using a mouse or conventional touchpad. Hotkeys reduce some of the inefficiency of alternation between keyboard and mouse but the current cursor-menu option-click paradigm requires laptop touchpads significant finger motion &amp; precision.</p>
<p>Surfing the net, I noticed that FingerWorks has created both the hardware &amp; software that maximises MultiTouch to truly revolutionise the user interface. Their touchpad-based systems&#8217; ergonomic sophistication dispense with the need for either mouse or touchscreen, and should minimise the incidences of both repetitive strain injury &amp; complaints of smudged screens.</p>
<p>Ideally, Windows 7 should have a sufficiently varied repertoire of MultiTouch gestures to enable the user to perform most tasks within each programme in Microsoft Office that currently require accurately moving the cursor across screens &amp; zigzagging into specific submenus. In Microsoft Word and Excel, for example, file, edit, formatting, view and data tasks should have gestures that obviate the need to use a mouse. Note that FingerWorks offered products that would even allow the user to configure their own gesture-based Macros! Further, hardware manufacturers should consider facilities to allow MultiTouch gestures based on TouchPads (with appropriate controls to suppress input from inadvertent touches during typing), or else there will be cases of arm strain from touchScreen use!</p>
<p>At the minimum, WIndows 7 will hopefully provide a touchScreen interface that overcomes the human finger&#8217;s inherent inaccuracy. IMHO, this could be either 1) automagnification of any area of the screen that is touched, akin to the way the Mac OS X Dock responds to a cursor, or 2) a &#8220;fingercot&#8221; which graphically translates touch into a contextually intelligent cursor and allows at least 3 multitouch gestures representing left-, right- and double-clicking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

