I’m still a little surprised to see this happen in a parking lot.

Check out Kari’s blog here: The Maddox’s.

Succinctly put, I am a restrictivist hoping that inclusivism is true. I hope that God will save more people than those who we know have heard the message of Christ. This group is too large to callously ignore.

Although inclusivism and restrictivism both present valid points, I find restrictivism better fits within a biblical model. Restrictivists affirm the necessity of Jesus in a more concrete manner than do inclusivists. (Sanders, pgs. 42-43, 57) General revelation is an important aspect of the unveiling of God to the world, but the Bible notes that “faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” (Romans 10:17, ESV). Although theoretically possible that people will be given an opportunity to believe after death, Hebrews notes that “after [death] comes judgment” (Hebrews 9:27; pg. 46). It seems more like wishful thinking than valid theology to operate with this sort of belief.

Although I do not fully subscribe to a reformed position, reformers make cogently argue the elect will hear the gospel (Sanders, pgs. 57-58). If the elect will hear the gospel, then all who do not hear the gospel are unelect and do not affect the mercy and love of God any more than a staunch Calvinist position would.

Universalism needs little explanation as an invalid theory as it denies every scripture regarding judgment (pg. 108) and removes every semblance of human choice (pg. 110).

Inclusivism rests on two things: first, the universal salvific nature of God (pg. 131) and a struggle within its adherents to reconcile a loving God who sends much of humanity to hell. I question whether theology based on personal feelings should define God. The greatest fault of inclusivism rests on the extra weight put on a few scriptures which indicate God’s desire for mankind’s salvation. If we could prove that one person would experience judgment (as Jesus strongly indicates) then we must conclude that God will not save all of mankind. If all of mankind is not saved, then a theological system that demands the universal accessibility of salvation is trivial. All will not accept salvation and we are not in a position to judge if it is fair. I made no choice that I would be born in Dallas, Texas to a certain family. It is plausible that God likewise makes salvific determinations in a similar manner. Romans 9:21 and the discourse between Job and God both indicate that God will do what He does.

I do see a few potential glimmers of hope regarding the salvation of the unevangelized. First, Paul’s encounter with Jesus was both real and not conveyed by men (Acts 8), and points to the possibility that the Spirit could supernaturally reveal Christ. Second, I disagree that people must refer to Jesus as “Christ” or “Jesus” since those terms were translated to English. “Christ” means “anointed,” so someone who has never heard of Christ can still know Christ because of the Spirit’s work in the world (Introduction III, Slide 24). Similarities within elements of world religions represent the Spirit’s work in the world (A. Lord, pg. 236). This raises the possibility that the Spirit has enlightened the hearts of others, but non-shared elements often contradict one another making a universal comparison difficult. It presents a good start but an incomplete end.

Here’s what we’ll present to them next week.

The sketches provide a basic overview of the elements of the design and constitute a wireframe to work from. This is always my first step in visualizing how to orient a site.

The second sketch was the one presented to the client.

The Grand Canyon at Dusk

Rural Sunset

A Taste of Fall

Sunset (2)