The Unpopular Truth

Chris Reifert of Autopsy reveals details of The Headless Ritual

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Thu, 02 May 2013 20:24:00 +0000

Chris Reifert of Autopsy reveals details of The Headless Ritual

Famed for their contributions to late-1980s death metal and its continued guidance through the 1990s, Autopsy arose as a band playing a chaotic, filthy, organic sounding form of death metal, which was in contrast to the more rigidly technical “Morbid Angel” inspired bands of the day. In many ways, Autopsy was a bridge between the more structured death metal and the more chaotic but more melodic bands from the grindcore world like Carcass and Bolt Thrower.

Fresh from the studio, Chris Reifert (drums) was able to give us a few words on the nature of the new album, its style and the future for Autopsy.

Typical liberal

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Tue, 30 Apr 2013 01:02:00 +0000

Reddit is a one-sided hive-mind groupthink circle-jerk

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:26:00 +0000

George W. Bush is smarter than you

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:44:00 +0000

I wanted to re-post Keith Hennessy's excellent article "George W. Bush is smarter than you," but for some magic reason, it's blocked on Facebook.

Facebook is throwing an error on this post:

The content you're trying to share includes a link that's been blocked for being spammy or unsafe:

http://files.wordpress.com/2013/04/43-paint-splattered.jpg

Leftists tend to work in unison and hive-mind on things that offend them, "reporting" them as "offensive," just so that they don't have to see the dangerous content. Dangerous to the mind, that is.

So here's a shunt. Click the following link to go to the article that Facebook blocked, probably because manic leftists kept hammering the "report" button on any page element they could find:

George W. Bush is smarter than you

Most conservatives don't know what conservatism is

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:26:00 +0000

Conservatives preserve the permanent things by holding on to that which not only works, but creates a transcendent beauty in life. This is why we idealize “the good, the beautiful and the true” and is why we conserve these things where we find them, resisting a tidal wave of human individualism and short-sighted solipsism.

The seeming paradox of this outlook is that, unlike modernism, it does not prescribe a single standard for all people; rather, it says that local standards should prevail. Unlike pluralism however it does not suggest many standards coexisting in the same place, but that they exist in parallel; this is the philosophy of parallelism espoused on this site.

As such, we who strive for the transcendental ideal are brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers, and cousins and colleagues to all who uphold tradition, values, art, beauty, religion and the human soul worldwide. Ours is not a universal language, but it is a universally applicable principle that benefits all civilizations that adopt it.

What makes this difficult is that, unlike modernism, our view is not centered in the individual as an oppressed antagonist of society at large. Instead, it sees civilizations as organic wholes in which each person serves a different but necessary role. There is no equality; better than that, there’s exclusive necessity.

- Brett Stevens interview at the Association for the Protection of the Lebanese Heritage

The problem with conservatism is that most conservatives have no idea this is what they're fighting for. Instead, their proxy wars have become their imperial agenda: business, abortion, prayer in schools, guns, etc. The point is not to let the liberals define the talking points, but to take charge and define those points on your own.

The revenge-fellatio obsession

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:48:00 +0000

What is fellatio? A desire to please. In the right circumstances, a relatively innocent thing. In the wrong ones, an acknowledgement of an abuser's superior role or how little the fellatist values himself/herself.

What are "wiggers"?

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:22:00 +0000

Insightful word from Bill Zebub:

As for wiggers, I was puzzled by that phenomenon when I went to a mostly-black high school. I kept my identity, but most of the white kids adopted a sort of minority-personality. In some cases it was ridiculous because the whites talked like spics. I almost wanted to take these whites aside and ask them if they are aware that spics talk like that because English was not their first language. It's an accent, not a willful way of talking. But years later I studied evolutionary psychology and have found some interesting explanations. Those whites who suddenly adopt a black or hispanic personality are the low-level humans, intellectually. They cannot break away from their brain-wiring, so-to-speak. They are blind conformists. Conformity is essential for a population to thrive. Groups that have high cohesiveness tend to compete with greater success than populations that have lots of free-thinkers, or that have higher numbers of selfish people. So a wigger, or a poser, is a red flag. That person will never be your true friend. He or she will betray you whenever there is a choice between loyalty to you or loyalty to the group. But even before I knew this stuff I always regarded wiggerism as just something to pity. - Metal Inquistion: The Bill Zebub Interview

It's interesting how many people in politics are acting out this broken submission. Their signal: we are afraid of the herd, we will just debase ourselves rather than rise above it. This applies to liberals in general, but also to any pacifists, assimilationists, multiculturalists, communists, etc.

The problem of informers

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:39:00 +0000

You can find these on both far-left and far-right political extremes:

Source.

Equal opportunity...not thinking that anymore

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:43:00 +0000

For some reason, this post was deleted:

In advance I am sorry but I just had to vent this.

I work for a VERY large IT company, in the top 5 in the world, bigger than Microsoft. I wont name them though.

This company is famous for its Equality between genders, its one of the reasons I enjoy working there. All people in the same job get the same money pretty much, good until I learnt about how woman actually earn more but thats another thing.

I feel very proud of the company I work for, the day I got Hired was up there as one of the happiest moments of my life not exaggerating. I wanted to work for them for many years before given the opportunity.

So time for the epic rant.... There is a new project about to start up. It is a huge project, would easily cost 100 Million Dollars and run over a 4 year time frame. This project is crucial. The potential earnings to the company if it succeeds will be revolutionary in IT Solutions for many large retail businesses around the world. I have been informed that the applicants were dwindled down to 5 of the many applicants. 3 experienced Project managers (male), one of whom has been the Project manager of at least 8 Highly successful Projects that I am aware of. We are not talking about making iTunes or something like that. These were staggering projects that were underfunded for the most part, and also had unrealistic time constraints. The other two were very fresh University Graduates with no Project experience let alone managing a project.

The person who got the job, was one of the fresh University Graduates without any experience....why? Because she was Female. The Hiring manager apparently needed to Diversify up the Project Managers (already about 1/3 are female) because there isn't enough gender equality. So the best person for the job didn't get it because of his dick. As a result the project is likely to fail, on top of that one of the other managers (known to me) when hearing about this said they hired the wrong person and that affirmative action is going to cost the company millions, is now having to go to meetings about his "inappropriate attitude".

This actually makes me sick. Because I know that I am going to suffer as a result of this shitty decision, the company I work for is going to definitely suffer as a result of losing such a valuable potential asset. Because in an industry where there is a greater number of males than females, because there are few women studying IT, it is unimaginable having few females than males across all sections.

Equal Opportunity workplace....not thinking that anymore. - A Voice For Men forums

So many modern things are "not as advertised" and in fact are the opposite. But I have to wonder: what made someone think that anything named "equal opportunity" is actually that? If the opportunity isn't equal by nature, that means human intervention. Human intervention always occurs for the party perceived to be weaker, not stronger. Thus while you hear "equal" and think "I get the same shot as everyone else," the truth is that "favored groups" get discriminated against in order to create that "opportunity" for others.

The roots of America's immigration problem

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:30:00 +0000

A frequent refrain among immigration enthusiasts is "But we've always been a land of immigrants, and we used to discriminate against the Irish, but now they're normal and mainstream! Thus immigration works!"

Except that, if you look at the history of the USA, Irish immigration has been an unbridled downfall:

By the 21st century, an estimated 80 million people worldwide claimed some Irish descent; among them are 50 million Americans who claim "Irish" as their primary ethnicity. - Wiki

The history of the Irish in the USA has been one of supporting maniacal religious movements, liberal politics, local corruption and the growth of huge cities. In short, they imported the same failings that made Ireland an impoverished rock with dead potato plants on it, and brought them into American life.

Whoever decided this was a good idea probably did it for the same reason we're importing hordes of Mexicans, Vietnamese, Guatemalans, etc.: cheap labor and even cheaper voters. Expect each group to re-create what it had at home, with the same disadvantages.

We're not all genetically the same

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:37:00 +0000

Small differences make big consequences. That's the rule for DNA, where much as in computer code, tiny variations can radically change how huge chunks of the information apply.

Despite that our oversocialized media tells us that we're all genetically the same, or essentially the same, and thus that we shouldn't be disturbed at interbreeding or poor breeding. We're all equal, see.

But in humans, a difference of 1 in 1,000 (0.10%) amounts to approximately 3 million nucleotide differences, because the human genome has about 3 billion nucleotides. That's a huge amount of data in difference.

We also share 50% of our DNA with the lowly banana.

In addition, our DNA reveals our origins in fish and how we develop like them in the womb, thus even tiny (1 bit) variations in DNA can cause things to fail to happen, and the baby to develop incomplete.

Guess the story's more complex than mainstream media will tell us.

Diversity can't be done

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:12:00 +0000

"Diversity -- of any form: ethnic, religious, cultural, linguistic -- doesn't work and only serves to make people more alienated by eliminating the ability to have a shared culture, history, identity and values system."

The fix to Reddit that Reddit fears

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:49:00 +0000

Reddit is nearly an ideal design for an online community. You can post a link, and the site automatically creates a discussion area for it. It allows you to group your links by topic in "subreddits." Perhaps most importantly, it allows you to vote up/down on links, (in theory) pushing the best to the top.

Of course, if you're here, you're probably conservative or otherwise a realist. Most people abuse power, especially if given a petty power that they think they can get away with. In fact, the smaller the power, the more likely it is that they perceive they have impunity, and thus abuse it.

(There are only a few people who can wield power with any honesty, and those are aristocrats or kings. They didn't participate in the madness of the last century and tried to resist it, which usually got them killed. Average people, on the other hand, supported it.)

On Reddit, down-votes are abused because people are petty. If some idea threatens them, they will mash the down-vote and try to hide it, as if reality changed because the message is invisible! And since Reddit is on the internet, and the internet is now the daytime TV audience from past generations, the bias shifts toward denial of any or all problems and toward any greeting-card styled "heartwarming," quirky, uplifting, kumbaya, etc. material.

There is a solution: limit the number of down-votes.

This however terrifies Reddit's admins and its Redditors. The dark secret of humanity is that many of us bond more on what we hate than what we love, and Reddit is dominated by petty hatred.

If you don't believe me, go to Reddit and post a message suggesting that down-votes could be limited per day, or per person, or both. You will find a very hostile response. Ask yourself: why?

What are they afraid of?

Varg Vikernes on Jewish people

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:25:00 +0000

We for sure saw this happen with the Black Metal sub-culture, which started as a nationalistic (Norwegian-centric), racist and anti-Christian revolt and ended up as just another perverse, twisted Jew-cult, embracing everything sick and anti-European on this planet, from porn and promiscuity to drugs and homosexuality. It began as an absolute revolt and ended up as absolute tastelessness. The Jew-dominated music industry took the most perverse bands and promoted them heavily, to ensure that it would not turn into anything healthy and positive. - "How to revolt in practice II"

I can't agree that the origin of the enemy here is Jews; clearly the enemy is liberalism brought on by overpopulation of European proles. It makes no sense to blame Jewish people for what is obviously a European malfunction that took to the air in France in 1789. Until we identify the right problem, it will rule us. I would also substitute "promiscuity" for homosexuality, or perhaps use both. For "racist," I would substitute "nationalist," because a nationalist preserves his/her tribe while "racists" tend to be race-obsessives.

Otherwise, I'm not sure what's broken here.

Further I think he should stop calling Eurasians "European." I do not dislike Asians, but if we hybridize with them, we will no longer be us.

"My experience, problems with H1B "

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:13:00 +0000

From Reddit -- such things tend to get deleted:

I've a long time engineer, mainly working in silicon valley. This is my observations:
1) As I understand it, the need for H1B is needed to fill jobs for which there are no US citizens and that this, inadvertently, corresponds to truly top notch people (on the theory, of course, that it’s easier to find less skilled labor). However, in my experience, only about 20% (subjectively) of the H1B engineers are particularly good and most of them are mediocre (i.e. overall no better than typical US born engineers in my estimation in particular in the software field). In short, I'm all for hiring the awesome but most simply aren't that good. (That’s true of US citizens too but they aren't the question.)
Furthermore, that doesn't even take communication skills into account and that’s a big deal. From personal experience, a significant, but minority, fraction of Indians have accents so thick that they are incomprehensible and likewise or worse for the Chinese with many Chinese also having the additional problem with unintelligible writing (though to be fair a significant fraction of American engineers can’t write themselves out of a paper bag...not that there's a Pulitzer in my future). If I have to spend 20 minutes deciphering a sentence in an email or I can't understand what a speaker is saying in a meeting, not uncommon, that's bad.
2) As I understand it, to hire these people companies are required to try and hire American citizens first but I've never heard, or heard of, a hiring manager who gave that a second thought as they know it simply is never an issue (i.e. any supposed “you must not be able to find an American first” laws are apparently easily skirted.).
3) I've worked for a Silicon Valley company that out of the 100-ish people I knew, from the CTO, VP of my engineering org, and his entire org,, only 3 or so were American born (not the CTO or VP either).
4) Contrary to its stated purpose, from what I've seen, the H1B program is mainly used to hire cheaper labor (i.e. lowering salaries). In fact the CTO, of 3) above, stated something like "got forbid he had to hire US citizens" on a purely economic basis. Note that in the end you would think the simply law of supply and demand implies that the H1B would force labor prices down.
5) We seem to have less and less American born engineers in particularly at the grad level. I audited a grad level class recently and only a couple of people, out of about 20, were US citizens. As I understand it, we don't fund our K-12 education (like Norway for instance) which makes this much more likely and then our college is becoming too expensive to boot. This does not bode well. It seems to me that if it wasn't for H1B we would be forced to address this issue but because we can get H1B people cheaper the gov't doesn't have to care (and the companies love the cheap labor and let’s face it, the US is a corrupt corporate/gov’t bribocracy)
6) It seems like it’s all some kind of Ponzi scheme in that given 5) above, we hire H1Bs but then they have children who have the same crappy and expensive education issues who then, as adults, deal with the same H1B competition while the companies laugh all the way to the bank (and as the economic data shows the corporate profits are not trickling down)
7) It seems to me that gov’ts are by definition supposed to be run for the benefit of the people and that they have a fiduciary responsibility to do so. Note that this isn't synonymous GDP or corporate profits. After all, right now corporate profits are at an all time high and yet living standards, by any number of metrics, are getting worse for the vast majority of Americans. So, the question then is whether the H1B program is in fact benefiting the U.S. citizens or just the companies and perhaps H1B visa holders?
I could certainly imagine, say in this countries industrial expansionary period decades ago, that importing labor was a great idea simply because 1) There really wasn't enough labor and 2) The benefit to the economy yielded more jobs for the current US citizens (in the median or such). However, it’s not clear to me whether that’s the case now and how one would quantify that (again GDP and corporate profits clearly aren't the proper measure).
I've heard the claims that many start ups are by people who are/were H1B but does that truly create net benefit to the existing US Citizens (or typical US Citizen) or is it just providing more corporate profits for the top fraction of 1% and a new wave of H1B people?
8) Finally, the northern European countries seem to do well without essentially disregarding educating their citizens in favor of hiring cheaper labor. After all, there are several billion people on the planet and most of them are much poorer than Americans and so if it’s just about cheap labor the logical conclusion would be to completely disregard the US citizens and just hire all the foreign poor well educated poor.

From Communism to Cannibalism

noreply@blogger.com (Ogden Ziegen) — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:07:00 +0000

Wonder why North Korea is becoming more hostile? They're hungry and want to be fed. If the US draws out of South Korea, it'd be all out war for their resources. If China cuts off their ties (China = 70% of trade for North Korea, while North Korea = less than %1 for China), North Korea would starve further. Any humanitarian aid would go straight to the government and military. In short: they're screwed, and militarizing themselves is making things worse.

The chimes of communism is resorting to cannibalism after famine struck an already impoverished land.

Those who eat their families get executed by firing squad:

“In my village in May, a man who killed his own two children and tried to eat them was executed by a firing squad,” an unnamed citizen journalist told Asia Press, which is based in Osaka, Japan. “While his wife was away on business he killed his eldest daughter and, because his son saw what he had done, he killed his son as well. When the wife came home, he offered her food, saying: ‘We have meat.’“

“In a village in Chongdang county, a man who went mad with hunger boiled his own child, ate his flesh and was arrested,” - official from the Korean Worker’s Party told Asia Press.

For further reading: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2269094/North-Korean-parents-eat-children-driven-mad-hunger-famine-hit-pariah-state.html

New grossest article of all time

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:04:00 +0000

http://fox6now.com/2013/02/20/corpse-found-in-la-hotels-water-tank/

We ran out of reporting on the poo ship that got stranded in the gulf
of Mexico and was covered in sewage while people defecated in plastic
bags. That was a great media feeding frenzy. Vomitous. Now we've got a
new gross-out: young lady comes to LA from Canada, immediately dies,
and her rotting corpse ends up in the hotel's water tank while guests
drink the cadaver tea flowing through the pipes.

"The water did have a funny taste," Sabrina Baugh told CNN on
Wednesday. She and her husband used the water for eight days.

"We never thought anything of it," the British woman said. "We thought
it was just the way it was here."

What she described was not normal.

"The shower was awful," she said. "When you turned the tap on, the
water was coming black first for two seconds and then it was going
back to normal."

India ravaged by commerce

noreply@blogger.com (Ogden Ziegen) — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:06:00 +0000

"Since 1997, 182,936 Indian farmers have taken their lives and the numbers continue to rise. According to a recent study by the National Crime Records Bureau, 46 Indian farmers kill themselves every day – that is roughly one suicide every 30 minutes – an alarming statistic in a country where agriculture is the economic mainstay"

Peasant farmers are killing themselves at an alarming rate because their crops are being ruined. Everyone is to blame for this scenario. Monsanto defying nature while manufacturing manipulated seeds; Indian farmers not knowing what they're buying. It's safe to say that the creators of agent orange that are using Indian deities to sell their products aren't doing the world a favor.

For further reading: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Monsanto_in_India

Political infighting in the Vatican

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:32:00 +0000

http://www.theglobaldispatch.com/pope-benedict-xvi-seeking-immunity-from-prosecution-for-mishandling-child-sex-abuse-allegations-49400/

There is no single person responsible for the child abuse, so my guess
is that the Pope's political adversaries won and have hung this on
him. He's a tempting target because he's far more traditional than the
"reformers" would want.

A plastic doll or simply a creature of appearance only?

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:53:00 +0000

http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/19/world/europe/uk-royal-duchess-controversy/index.html

When Charles married Diana, people worried about her deviation from
tradition. All the wise liberals told us no, no, she's a lady of the
people. Now we see what she wrought: royals who like commoners choose
by appearance instead of function/content. The result is that a prince
marries a bar girl and we're supposed to cheer. Remember he picked her
because she basically exposed herself to him in a sheer dress. Can't
wait for the royal divorce. She'll retire rich.

Texas is the reason

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:47:00 +0000

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/lone-star-rising-87687.html

The state is growing like mad because of energy money and cheap
living. This is a disaster waiting to explode. The infrastructure
isn't geared up for this, nor is the social network ready for
California-style "everybody do it YOUR way" chaos. Watch for Texas to
implode soon, with the benefactors being smaller cities who will
harvest the cream of the crop of the exodus (brain drain).

Why Did The Pope Resign? Excessive Pedophilia

noreply@blogger.com (Ogden Ziegen) — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:55:00 +0000

Pope Benedict was chosen by God and decided to quit.

With numerous reports of child molestation resulting in public outcries for justice, then the Vatileaks scandal; it's safe to assume the Vatican is clenching at the coattails of its former power. Perhaps Benedict is too frail to hold off the news medias exposing the fallacies of the Catholic Church.

It is estimated that at least 4% of Roman Catholic priests in the US sexually abuse children. Who would want to be in charge of that operation?

State of the Empire

noreply@blogger.com (BLOGGER) — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:18:00 +0000

The Unpopular Truth is run by a consortium of independent writers, artists and political thinkers.

We also collaborate on several other projects:

Amerika.org - politics and society.
Nihil.org - philosophy and nihilism.
Groin.com - sex and violence.
DeathMetal.org - death metal and black metal.

In addition to this, we maintain several domains dedicated to great thinkers currently unrecognized in this world:

Julius Evola - radical traditionalist and esotericist conservative.
Pentti Linkola - deep ecologist and ecofascist.

Look for more fun, interesting or terrifying content from us soon.

Why people on the internet are so weird

noreply@blogger.com (Brett Stevens) — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:13:00 +0000

I've come to the conclusion that social networking is screwed up because the people who use it most are the people who are least invested in reality.

Every time I try to use Facebook, I get driven away by the behavior of its users. Not the Instagram dinner plate updates, or the personal drama, because I've already filtered out those people.

It's the sensitivity. People take anything seriously. I posted an article showing that divorce really screws up kids. I got back a half-dozen replies, all from people who'd had divorces, defending their own decisions. When I said that it wasn't personal, they said they still felt attacked.

There were other instances of similar behavior too. People hover around Facebook, looking for some reason to cause a scene. Why was this, I wondered.

It seems to me that if you have found something worth doing in life, you're mostly doing it. That doesn't mean your job. If your job sucks, you've probably got a project on the side. You're not going to devote your time to screwing around, which is what most people on Facebook do.

This means that social networking including Facebook selects out the people who have any direction in life, and leaves the resentful, bored, unemployed, disabled, upset, insane, teenage, etc. and concentrates them in large numbers. This is why so much of the response is crazy.

I should amend the post title. I used to keep trying to use Facebook (and MySpace, Digg, Reddit, Friendster, Pinterest, etc.). But now, I don't. These aren't places where healthy people hang out.

http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3445509&cid=42831477

The internet is a freak show because since September 1996, its audience have been the same people who watch a lot of daytime TV: the elderly, the mentally disabled, the unemployed, the drug addicted, the ill, the basement dwellers, the elderly, the teenage dropouts, the alienated, etc.

Not all of these are bad, but as a whole, this group is not society's most useful people. Some are highly insightful, but the crowd of the insane quickly reduces their input to background noise. In the meantime, the normal people avoid it except casually, which in turn keeps the most prolific dissident minds away, because they can't reach their audience through it.

Like society itself, it is a case of a good thing being created, and then the Crowd rushing in and taking over, and because it has a pathological need to represent its dogma as the only truth so that its members are not personally affronted by a reality that denies their wishes for what reality "should" be, the Crowd rigidly campaigning against any outside viewpoint. It's a parallel to a liberal takeover of a society.

As the West dies, insanity becomes the norm.

Why the far right will never get anywhere

noreply@blogger.com (Conservationist) — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:13:00 +0000

It's a circular firing squad:

From Reddit.

They're too busy upholding an image, and being individually "important," to unite and achieve anything.

If I were a hostile government agency, I'd want to make sure that any pro-white person felt that they had only two options:

Be a jew-hating, negro-hating, violent, alienated, impoverished, prison-bound Nazi;
Or, not.

The point is that all of those things in the first category are inextricably linked. In the anti-rightist view, you can't be a rightist without being a social dropout.

It's a very successful strategy, for those who oppose the right. As long a the right behaves this way, it will both drive away any popular support and consume itself from within.

It's not surprising the right has achieved nothing in the last 70 years.

The tragedy is that it's avoidable. As long as the doctrinaire extreme of the movement keep inducing good people like Occidentalist into being destructive, the real villains don't need to get their hands dirty and get to watch the right fail without a single touch.