Appellate Law NJ Blog

The Supreme Court Corrects Itself

Bruce D. Greenberg — Wed, 23 May 2012 12:47:10 +0000

W.J.A. v. D.A., ___ N.J. ___ (2012). On May 16, the Supreme Court issued its per curiam decision in this case, as discussed here. On May 21, without comment, the Court issued a corrected opinion. The difference appears to be that the Court has excised several sentences that stated that an award of nominal damages [...]

Work Product Doctrine and Common Interest Privilege Exempt Documents From Disclosure Under OPRA or Common Law Right of Access

Bruce D. Greenberg — Mon, 21 May 2012 22:50:07 +0000

O’Boyle v. Borough of Longport, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2012). This is yet another Open Public Records Act (“OPRA”) case. Plaintiff was a frequent antagonist of the defendant Borough, hostility that began when the Borough cited him for a zoning violation. Plaintiff had sued not only the Borough but a former planning and [...]

Three Appellate Practice Nuggets from the NJSBA Annual Meeting

Bruce D. Greenberg — Fri, 18 May 2012 00:44:29 +0000

The NJSBA Annual Meeting in Atlantic City featured a program today on the “nuts and bolts” of appellate practice. The panel of speakers was headed by Judges Carchman and Messano. Naturally, many of the “nuts and bolts” were the kinds of things that, though useful, have been said elsewhere, such as here and here. At [...]

“Presumed Damages” Doctrine Remains Viable in Defamation Cases Involving Purely Private Plaintiff Cases

Bruce D. Greenberg — Wed, 16 May 2012 21:33:55 +0000

W.J.A. v. D.A., ___ N.J. ___ (2012). The doctrine of “presumed damages” allows plaintiffs in defamation cases to obtain damages even without a showing of actual harm to the plaintiff’s reputation. In slander cases (other than those involving slander per se, which entails accusations of crime, loathsome disease, serious sexual misconduct, or misfeasance in business), a plaintiff must prove [...]

JCP&L Can be Liable for Negligent Placement of Electrical Pole

Bruce D. Greenberg — Tue, 15 May 2012 18:45:39 +0000

Seals v. County of Morris, ___ N.J. ___ (2012). While driving on a snow-covered road, plaintiffs could not negotiate a curve in the road and struck a JCP&L electrical pole located near the side of that road. The County of Morris did not own, but did have an easement over, the property on which the pole [...]

Attorney Charging Lien Subordinated to Interest of Preserving Funds for Children’s Education

Bruce D. Greenberg — Tue, 15 May 2012 00:33:53 +0000

Sauro v. Sauro, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2012). This contentious divorce action boiled down to the complaint of a large law firm that an equitable distribution award was improper because, in making that award, the Family Part improperly elevated the interests of the divorcing couple’s children in having money available for their college education above the [...]

Cap on Sick Leave Payments to School Administrators Upheld

Bruce D. Greenberg — Thu, 10 May 2012 12:59:06 +0000

New Jersey Ass’n of School Adminstrators v. Schundler, ___ N.J. ___ (2012). This case required the Supreme Court to parse and reconcile an unusually complex scheme of statutes and regulations that dealt with benefits available by contract to high-level school administrators. In 2007, the Legislature passed measures designed to hold down property taxes and to [...]

Supreme Court Will Review Emma v. Evans

Bruce D. Greenberg — Tue, 08 May 2012 11:32:16 +0000

In Emma v. Evans, 424 N.J. Super. 36 (App. Div. 2012), the Appellate Division addressed the question of whether the presumption in favor of the parent of primary residence who seeks a surname change for a child, established in Gubernat v. December, 140 N.J. 120 (1985), where the parents were unmarried, applies to a child whose parents were married but got [...]

Attorney Disqualified From Representing Party in Same Matter Where Attorney Previously Represented Adverse Party

Bruce D. Greenberg — Mon, 07 May 2012 15:28:21 +0000

Twenty-First Century Rail Corp. v. New Jersey Transit Corp., ___ N.J. ___ (2012). This case involved an effort to disqualify counsel in a construction case for a conflict of interest under Rule of Professional Conduct 1.9 (“RPC 1.9″). The Law Division denied disqualification. In a published opinion, reported at 419 N.J. Super. 343 (App. Div. 2011), [...]

“Are Oral Arguments Worth Arguing About?”

Bruce D. Greenberg — Mon, 07 May 2012 13:29:29 +0000

Yesterday’s New York Times contained a column by Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court of the United States, entitled “Are Oral Arguments Worth Arguing About?” That column makes the point that, ultimately, whether an appellate oral advocate delivers his or her oral argument seamlessly matters far less than the merits of the case. The [...]