<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >
    <channel>
        <title>Ars Technica</title>
        <atom:link href="https://arstechnica.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://arstechnica.com</link>
        <description>Serving the Technologist since 1998. News, reviews, and analysis.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>
            hourly        </sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>
            1        </sy:updateFrequency>
        
 
            <item>
                <title>Visitors to this private space station won&#039;t be wearing shorts and T-shirts</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/vast-reveals-flight-suit-tests-timepiece-for-commercial-space-station/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/vast-reveals-flight-suit-tests-timepiece-for-commercial-space-station/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Robert Pearlman]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronaut flight suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial space station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flight badge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haven-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IWC Schaffhausen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mission patch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pilot's Venturer Verical Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wristwatch]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/vast-reveals-flight-suit-tests-timepiece-for-commercial-space-station/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Can you wear white after Labor Day if your destination is Earth orbit? ]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>After more than 25 years of US astronauts wearing off-the-rack clothes while living in Earth orbit, a company working to launch the world's first commercial space station has adopted a more custom approach to its crew attire.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.collectspace.com/news/news-042226a-vast-astronaut-flight-suit-iwc-watch.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Vast has revealed its astronaut flight suit</a>, a two-piece outfit designed to be worn both on and off the planet. The company also certified a custom-Swiss wristwatch for use aboard its upcoming Haven-1 space station.</p>
<p>"Over the last two decades on the International Space Station, astronauts have moved away from wearing flight suits every day," Drew Feustel, Vast's lead astronaut and former NASA mission specialist who spent 225 days in space, said <a href="https://www.vastspace.com/updates/vast-astronaut-flight-suit-designed-for-the-next-era-of-human-spaceflight" target="_blank" rel="noopener">in a statement</a>. "The environment has become safer and more like how we work on Earth."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/vast-reveals-flight-suit-tests-timepiece-for-commercial-space-station/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/vast-reveals-flight-suit-tests-timepiece-for-commercial-space-station/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/news-042226a-lg-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/news-042226a-lg-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Vast</media:credit><media:text>The Vast Astronaut Flight Suit showcases the company's "focus on human-centric design." The crew of Vast's Haven-1, planned as the world's first commercial space station, will wear this suit for events, training, and their mission in Earth orbit.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>US accuses China of “industrial-scale” AI theft. China says it’s “slander.”</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/us-accuses-china-of-industrial-scale-ai-theft-china-says-its-slander/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/us-accuses-china-of-industrial-scale-ai-theft-china-says-its-slander/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ashley Belanger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distillation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China relations]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/us-accuses-china-of-industrial-scale-ai-theft-china-says-its-slander/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Trump-Xi summit may be rocked by US mulling huge sanctions.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The US is preparing to crack down on China's allegedly "industrial-scale theft of American artificial intelligence labs’ intellectual property," the Financial Times <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/abde4e1e-c69a-4cc4-ad96-d88308314298">reported</a> Thursday.</p>
<p>Since the launch of DeepSeek—a Chinese model that <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/01/i-agree-with-openai-you-shouldnt-use-other-peoples-work-without-permission/">OpenAI claimed was trained using outputs from its models</a>—other AI firms have accused global rivals of using a method called distillation to steal their IP. In January, <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/attackers-prompted-gemini-over-100000-times-while-trying-to-clone-it-google-says/">Google claimed</a> that "commercially motivated" actors not limited to China attempted to clone its Gemini AI chatbot by promoting the model more than 100,000 times in bids to train cheaper copycats. The next month, Anthropic <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/detecting-and-preventing-distillation-attacks">accused</a> Chinese firms DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax of using the same tactic to generate "over 16 million exchanges with Claude through approximately 24,000 fraudulent accounts." Also in February, OpenAI confirmed that most attacks it saw originated from China.</p>
<p>For the US, these distillation attacks supposedly threaten to help China quickly catch up in the AI race. In a memo that FT reviewed, the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Michael Kratsios, warned that "the US government has information indicating that foreign entities, principally based in China, are engaged in deliberate, industrial-scale campaigns to distill US frontier AI systems."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/us-accuses-china-of-industrial-scale-ai-theft-china-says-its-slander/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/us-accuses-china-of-industrial-scale-ai-theft-china-says-its-slander/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-1195493804-1152x648-1776978131.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-1195493804-500x500-1776978121.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Luxento Studio | Moment</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Carbon nanotube wiring gets closer to competing with copper</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/researchers-get-carbon-nanotube-wiring-to-conduct-more-like-copper/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/researchers-get-carbon-nanotube-wiring-to-conduct-more-like-copper/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[John Timmer]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon nanotubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materials science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/researchers-get-carbon-nanotube-wiring-to-conduct-more-like-copper/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[While this material degrades over time, it could point to better ones.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Shortly after their discovery, carbon nanotubes seemed to be a material wonder. There were metallic and semiconducting forms; they were tiny and incredibly light; and they could only be broken by tearing apart chemical bonds. The ideas for using them seemed endless.</p>
<p>But then the reality of working with them set in. It was hard to get a pure population of metallic or semiconducting forms. Synthesis techniques tended to produce a tangle of mostly short nanotubes; those that extended for more than a couple of centimeters remain rare. And while the metallic version offered little resistance to carrying electric current, it was hard to send many electrons down the nanotube.</p>
<p>Materials scientists, however, are a stubborn bunch, and they're still trying to get them to work. Today's issue of Science includes a paper describing the addition of a chemical to carbon nanotube bundles to boost their ability to carry current to levels closer to those of copper. While the more conductive nanotubes weren't stable, the discovery may point the way toward something with a longer shelf life.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/researchers-get-carbon-nanotube-wiring-to-conduct-more-like-copper/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/researchers-get-carbon-nanotube-wiring-to-conduct-more-like-copper/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-157692460-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-157692460-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>theasis</media:credit><media:text>A multi-walled carbon nanotube.  In this work, the tubes only had two layers.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>We still don&#039;t have a more precise value for &quot;Big G&quot;</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/we-still-dont-have-a-more-precise-value-for-big-g/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/we-still-dont-have-a-more-precise-value-for-big-g/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jennifer Ouellette]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundamental constants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravitational constant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/we-still-dont-have-a-more-precise-value-for-big-g/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Such experiments bring "order to the universe, whether or not the number agrees with the expected value.”]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<div class="ars-video"><div class="relative" allow="fullscreen" loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_HGY9TTiEpg?start=0&amp;wmode=transparent"></div></div>
<p>The gravitational constant, affectionally known as "Big G," is one of the most fundamental constants of our universe. Its value describes the strength of the gravitational force acting on two masses separated by a given distance—or if you want to be relativistic about it, the amount a given mass curves space-time. Physicists have a solid ballpark figure for the value of Big G, but they've been trying to measure it ever more precisely for more than two centuries, each effort yielding slightly different values. And we do mean slight: The values vary by roughly one part in 10,000.</p>
<p>Still, other fundamental constants are known much more precisely. So Big G is the black sheep of the family and a point of frustration for physicists keen on precision metrology. The problem is that gravity is so weak, by far the weakest of the four fundamental forces, so there is significant background noise from the gravitational field of the Earth (aka "little g"). That weakness is even more pronounced in a laboratory.</p>
<p>In the latest effort to resolve the issue, scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) spent the last decade replicating one of the most divergent recent experimental results. The group just announced their results in <a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1681-7575/ae570f">a paper</a> published in the journal Metrologia. It does not resolve the discrepancy, but it gives physicists one more data point in their ongoing quest to nail down a more precise value for Big G.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/we-still-dont-have-a-more-precise-value-for-big-g/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/we-still-dont-have-a-more-precise-value-for-big-g/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/bigG1-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/bigG1-500x500-1776860219.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>R. Eskalis/NIST</media:credit><media:text>NIST scientists Stephan Schlamminger (left) and Vincent Lee examine the torsion balance they used to measure the gravitational constant ("Big G"), a decade-long undertaking. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>In a first, a ransomware family is confirmed to be quantum-safe</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/now-even-ransomware-is-using-post-quantum-cryptography/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/now-even-ransomware-is-using-post-quantum-cryptography/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Dan Goodin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Biz & IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kyber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ransomware]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/now-even-ransomware-is-using-post-quantum-cryptography/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Technically speaking, there's no practical benefit to use PQC. So why is it being used?]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>A relatively new ransomware family is using a novel approach to hype the strength of the encryption used to scramble files—making, or at least claiming, that it is protected against attacks by quantum computers.</p>
<p>Kyber, as the ransomware is called, has been around since at least <a href="https://www.watchguard.com/wgrd-security-hub/ransomware-tracker/kyber">last September</a> and quickly <a href="https://cyber.netsecops.io/articles/new-kyber-ransomware-strain-discovered-with-advanced-encryption/?utm_me%E2%80%A6=">attracted attention</a> for the claim that it used <a href="https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/203/final">ML-KEM</a>, short for Module Lattice-based Key Encapsulation Mechanism and is a standard shepherded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The Kyber ransomware name comes from the alternate name for ML-KEM, which is also Kyber. For the rest of the article, Kyber refers to the ransomware; the algorithm is referred to as ML-KEM.</p>
<h2>It's all about marketing</h2>
<p>ML-KEM is an asymmetric encryption method for exchanging keys. It involves problems based on lattices, a structure in mathematics that quantum computers have no advantage in solving over classic computing. ML-KEM is designed to replace Elliptic Curve and RSA cryptosystems, both of which are based on problems that quantum computers with sufficient strength can tackle.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/now-even-ransomware-is-using-post-quantum-cryptography/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/now-even-ransomware-is-using-post-quantum-cryptography/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/GettyImages-1952157610-1152x648-1753386930.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/GettyImages-1952157610-500x500-1753386908.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>JuSun/Getty Images</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>RFK Jr.&#8217;s rejection of germ theory debunked in Senate hearing</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-s-rejection-of-germ-theory-debunked-in-senate-hearing/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-s-rejection-of-germ-theory-debunked-in-senate-hearing/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Beth Mole]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 18:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernie sanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill cassidy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[childhood mortality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germ theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrain theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-s-rejection-of-germ-theory-debunked-in-senate-hearing/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Kennedy falsely argues that vaccines did little to lower childhood deaths.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/hearing-on-fiscal-year-2027-department-of-health-and-human-services-budget">a Congressional hearing on Wednesday</a>, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) directly confronted anti-vaccine Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on his rejection of germ theory—the unquestionable scientific idea that specific pathogenic microbes cause specific diseases. After Kennedy defended his fringe view, Senator Bill Cassidy fact-checked and debunked Kennedy's denialist arguments in real time.</p>
<p>The exchanges mark a rare instance in which Kennedy's dismissal of germ theory has been raised in such a high-profile public setting, in this case, a hearing of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Kennedy, who has no background in science, medicine, or public health, is well known as an ardent anti-vaccine activist and peddler of conspiracy theories. But his startling rejection of a cornerstone theory in biomedical science has mostly been underreported.</p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2025/04/rfk-jr-s-anti-vaccine-stance-is-rooted-in-a-disbelief-in-germ-theory/">As Ars Technica reported last year</a>, Kennedy wrote about his germ theory denialism explicitly in his 2021 book <em>The Real Anthony Fauci</em>. In it, Kennedy maligns germ theory as a tool of pharmaceutical companies, scientists, and doctors to promote the use of modern medicines. Instead of accepting germ theory, Kennedy promotes a concept akin to the discarded terrain theory, in which diseases stem not from germs, but from imbalances in the body's inner "terrain." Those imbalances are claimed to be caused by poor nutrition and exposure to environmental toxins and stressors. (In his book, Kennedy erroneously labels this as "miasma theory," but that is a different theory that suggests diseases derive from breathing bad air, vapors, or mists from decaying or corrupting matter. The idea was supplanted by germ theory, while terrain theory was never widely accepted.)</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-s-rejection-of-germ-theory-debunked-in-senate-hearing/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-s-rejection-of-germ-theory-debunked-in-senate-hearing/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>174</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2271975525-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2271975525-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty | Tom Williams</media:credit><media:text> HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., testifies during the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing titled "FY2027 Department of Health and Human Services Budget," in Dirksen building on Wednesday, April 22, 2026. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Why are the Mac mini and Mac Studio gradually becoming impossible to buy?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/apples-m4-mac-mini-including-the-599-one-is-gradually-becoming-impossible-to-buy/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/apples-m4-mac-mini-including-the-599-one-is-gradually-becoming-impossible-to-buy/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Andrew Cunningham]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple silicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac mini]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/apples-m4-mac-mini-including-the-599-one-is-gradually-becoming-impossible-to-buy/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Pending refresh? RAM shortage? AI agents? There are many possible explanations.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>It's a good time to be in the market for a MacBook, between the affordability of the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/apple-macbook-neo-review-can-a-mac-get-by-with-an-iphones-processor-inside/">MacBook Neo</a>, the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/testing-apples-2026-16-inch-macbook-pro-m5-max-and-its-new-performance-cores/">power of the M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook Pros</a>, and the all-around appeal of <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/m5-macbook-air-review-still-the-best-macbook-for-almost-everybody/">the M5 MacBook Air</a>. But Apple's desktop computers are another story, and not <em>just</em> because they're all about due for their own M5 upgrades.</p>
<p>Over the last few months, the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/apple/2024/11/review-m4-and-m4-pro-mac-minis-are-probably-apples-best-mac-minis-ever/">Mac mini</a> and the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/m4-max-and-m3-ultra-mac-studio-review-a-weird-update-but-it-mostly-works/">Mac Studio</a> have gradually become harder to buy. The 512GB M3 Ultra Mac Studio was <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/apples-512gb-mac-studio-vanishes-a-quiet-acknowledgement-of-the-ram-shortage/">removed from Apple's website</a>, and other models of both desktops have seen their ship times slip from days to weeks to months. <a href="https://www.macrumors.com/2026/04/11/some-mac-mini-mac-studio-currently-unavailable/">In the last couple of weeks</a>, several other configurations of Mac mini and Studio have begun showing up as "currently unavailable" on Apple's website, which virtually never happens even when Apple is planning an imminent hardware refresh.</p>
<p>This week (<a href="https://www.macrumors.com/2026/04/22/base-mac-mini-sold-out-from-apple-online-store/">as spotted by MacRumors</a>), the baseline $599 M4 Mac mini, which offers 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, earned the "currently unavailable" label for the first time.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/apples-m4-mac-mini-including-the-599-one-is-gradually-becoming-impossible-to-buy/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/apples-m4-mac-mini-including-the-599-one-is-gradually-becoming-impossible-to-buy/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/IMG_2341-1152x648.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/IMG_2341-500x500.jpeg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Andrew Cunningham</media:credit><media:text>Apple's M4 Mac mini is getting harder and harder to buy.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>US Space Command: Russia is now operationalizing co-orbital ASAT weapons</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/us-space-command-russia-is-now-operationalizing-co-orbital-asat-weapons/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/us-space-command-russia-is-now-operationalizing-co-orbital-asat-weapons/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Stephen Clark]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-satellite tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space command]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen whiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us space command]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/us-space-command-russia-is-now-operationalizing-co-orbital-asat-weapons/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["They’re putting operational systems up within orbit reach of our high-value satellites."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>After several tests of unusual "nesting doll" satellites in low-Earth orbit, Russia is now fielding operational anti-satellite weapons with valuable US government satellites in their crosshairs, the four-star general leading US Space Command said this week.</p>
<p>Gen. Stephen Whiting didn't name the system, but he was almost certainly referring to a Russian military program named Nivelir, which has launched four satellites shadowing US spy satellites owned by the National Reconnaissance Office in low-Earth orbit. After reaching orbit, the Nivelir satellites have released smaller ships to start their own maneuvers, and at least one of those lobbed a mystery object at high velocity during a test in 2020. US analysts concluded this was a projectile that could be fired at another satellite.</p>
<p>US officials have compared the Nivelir architecture to a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matryoshka_doll">Matryoshka doll</a>, or a Russian nesting doll, with an outer shell concealing smaller, unknown figures inside.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/us-space-command-russia-is-now-operationalizing-co-orbital-asat-weapons/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/us-space-command-russia-is-now-operationalizing-co-orbital-asat-weapons/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/67469fe6f9f318ac2797c794_AD_4nXc0OD8x37B8buJN62KOaVywNvy0tP54Y9M6LBvLEBWUYR-T-mCYTKg6JWZdQ5koQ_0VfME8bBO7M6r2qxd_VzLINfISFw9ai3KNi-cVj7XllIYRUibTTkJ63loXPULHfBPFHaqY-g-1000x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1000" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/67469fe6f9f318ac2797c794_AD_4nXc0OD8x37B8buJN62KOaVywNvy0tP54Y9M6LBvLEBWUYR-T-mCYTKg6JWZdQ5koQ_0VfME8bBO7M6r2qxd_VzLINfISFw9ai3KNi-cVj7XllIYRUibTTkJ63loXPULHfBPFHaqY-g-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>HEO</media:credit><media:text>A space-based camera owned by the Australian company HEO captured this view of Kosmos 2558, one of Russia's suspected Nivelir satellites in low-Earth orbit.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Apple stops weirdly storing data that let cops spy on Signal chats</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/apple-stops-weirdly-storing-data-that-let-cops-spy-on-signal-chats/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/apple-stops-weirdly-storing-data-that-let-cops-spy-on-signal-chats/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ashley Belanger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encrypted chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signal]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/apple-stops-weirdly-storing-data-that-let-cops-spy-on-signal-chats/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Signal “very happy” Apple fixed bug storing private chats after app was deleted.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Apple fixed a security bug that made it possible for cops to access content from deleted Signal messages.</p>
<p>Vulnerable users hoping to evade law enforcement surveillance often use encrypted apps like Signal to communicate sensitive information. That's why users felt blindsided when 404 Media <a href="https://www.404media.co/fbi-extracts-suspects-deleted-signal-messages-saved-in-iphone-notification-database-2/">reported</a> that Apple was unexpectedly storing push notifications displaying parts of encrypted messages for up to a month. This occurred even after the message was set to disappear and the app itself was deleted from the device.</p>
<p>404 Media flagged the issue after speaking to multiple people who attended a hearing where the FBI testified that it "was able to forensically extract copies of incoming Signal messages from a defendant’s iPhone, even after the app was deleted, because copies of the content were saved in the device’s push notification database." The shocking revelation came in a case that 404 Media noted was "the first time authorities charged people for alleged 'Antifa' activities after President Trump designated the umbrella term a terrorist organization."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/apple-stops-weirdly-storing-data-that-let-cops-spy-on-signal-chats/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/apple-stops-weirdly-storing-data-that-let-cops-spy-on-signal-chats/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2155003588-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2155003588-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Moor Studio | DigitalVision Vectors</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Eight months early and under budget, the Roman Telescope is ready to launch</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/eight-months-early-and-under-budget-the-roman-telescope-is-ready-to-launch/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/eight-months-early-and-under-budget-the-roman-telescope-is-ready-to-launch/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[John Timmer]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roman space telescope]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/eight-months-early-and-under-budget-the-roman-telescope-is-ready-to-launch/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Spy satellite hardware has been repurposed to scan the Universe in the infrared.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>GREENBELT, Md.—On Tuesday, NASA invited the press to look at the fully assembled Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, which is now ready to join the ranks of the great observatories in orbit, ahead of its September launch. The Roman Space Telescope (NGRST), named after <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Roman">a key figure</a> in the planning of the Hubble Space Telescope, is notably distinct from hardware like the Hubble and Webb, as it's designed around a wide-field view and massive imaging system that will allow it to send back 1.4 terabytes of data to Earth every day.</p>
<p>It also has an unusual history that began when NASA's planning intersected with surplus spy hardware.</p>
<h2>In from the cold</h2>
<p>Many of the gases in our atmosphere absorb infrared wavelengths, contributing to the greenhouse effect that has helped keep the planet habitable for us. But that effect also makes infrared astronomy from Earth extremely difficult. That's unfortunate, as a number of important phenomena, from the earliest galaxies to the features of exoplanet atmospheres, are only detectable at infrared wavelengths. There have been a number of infrared-specific telescopes put into space, notably the <a href="https://science.nasa.gov/mission/spitzer/">Spitzer</a>, one of the original suite of Great Observatories.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/eight-months-early-and-under-budget-the-roman-telescope-is-ready-to-launch/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/eight-months-early-and-under-budget-the-roman-telescope-is-ready-to-launch/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/IMG_1944-1152x648.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/IMG_1944-500x500.jpeg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>JOHN TIMMER</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>BMW bumps the 7 Series for 2027, adds all-new battery</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/bmw-bumps-the-7-series-for-2027-adds-all-new-battery/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/bmw-bumps-the-7-series-for-2027-adds-all-new-battery/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Stephen Edelstein]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 15:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW 7 Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW i7]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/bmw-bumps-the-7-series-for-2027-adds-all-new-battery/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The 2027 7 Series is available as an EV, with an inline-six, or an inline-six PHEV.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>In 1968, having achieved a modicum of stability through the introduction of its seminal Neue Klasse (or “new class”) models, BMW scaled up its styling and used the company's M10 four-cylinder engine as the basis for a new inline-six in a larger sedan known by chassis code E3, the ancestor to today’s BMW 7 Series. History repeats itself with the latest version of BMW’s flagship sedan.</p>
<p>The 2027 BMW 7 Series is a refresh of the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2022/11/how-the-the-wire-helped-me-understand-the-2023-bmw-760i-xdrive/">seventh-generation G70</a> version that arrived in the United States as a 2023 model. But the changes are much more extensive than the typical refresh, or “life cycle impulse” (LCI) in BMW-speak. That’s because the updated 7 Series borrows tech and styling elements from the new Neue Klasse—the family of EVs that so far includes the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/12/great-handling-advanced-ev-tech-we-drive-the-2026-bmw-ix3/">iX3 crossover</a> and <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/03/heres-bmws-first-all-electric-3-series-the-2027-i3/">i3 sedan</a>.</p>
<p>This hulking sedan still lacks the grace of its E3 and E23 ancestors, but the infusion of Neue Klasse details and other tweaks definitely help. The rear bumper has a cleaner look, as does the front end, which has a simplified version of the previous split-lighting arrangement of daytime running lights above rectangular headlights nestled in coves that also house the intakes for the front-wheel air curtains.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/bmw-bumps-the-7-series-for-2027-adds-all-new-battery/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/bmw-bumps-the-7-series-for-2027-adds-all-new-battery/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/DSC_0148-1152x648.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/DSC_0148-500x500.jpeg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Stephen Edelstein</media:credit><media:text>The kidney grille is a good place to hide forward-looking sensors.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Greenhouse gases from data center boom could outpace entire nations</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/greenhouse-gases-from-data-center-boom-could-outpace-entire-nations/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/greenhouse-gases-from-data-center-boom-could-outpace-entire-nations/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Molly Taft, wired.com]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/greenhouse-gases-from-data-center-boom-could-outpace-entire-nations/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Plants from OpenAI, Meta, xAI, and Microsoft could emit more than 129M tons annually.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">New gas projects linked to just 11 </span><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-us-government-to-ask-data-centers-how-much-power-they-use/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">data center campuses</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> around the US have the potential to create more </span><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-epa-is-ending-greenhouse-gas-data-collection-who-will-step-up-to-fill-the-gap/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">greenhouse gases</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> than the country of Morocco emitted in 2024. Emissions estimates from air permit documents examined by WIRED show that these natural gas projects—which are being built to power data centers to serve some of the US’s most powerful AI companies, including </span><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/openai-executive-kevin-weil-is-leaving-the-company/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">OpenAI</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, </span><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/meta-is-sued-over-scam-ads-on-facebook-and-instagram/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Meta</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, </span><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/anthropic-mythos-preview-project-glasswing/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Microsoft</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, and </span><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/musk-v-altman-trial-openai-xai/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">xAI</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">—have the potential to emit more than 129 million tons of greenhouse gases per year.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As tech companies race to secure massive power deals to build out hundreds of data centers across the country, these projects represent just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the potential climate cost of the AI boom.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The infrastructure on this list of large natural gas projects reviewed by WIRED is being developed to largely bypass the grid and provide power solely for data centers, a trend known as behind-the-meter power. As data center developers face long waits for connections to traditional utilities, and amid mounting public resistance to the possibility of higher energy bills, making their own power is becoming an increasingly popular option. These projects have either been announced or are under construction, with companies already submitting air permit application materials with state agencies.</span></p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/greenhouse-gases-from-data-center-boom-could-outpace-entire-nations/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/greenhouse-gases-from-data-center-boom-could-outpace-entire-nations/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/microsoft_datacenter_2025-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/microsoft_datacenter_2025-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Bloomberg via Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>A Microsoft data center in Aldie, Virginia, US seen in October 2025.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Crypto scam lures ships into Strait of Hormuz, falsely promising safe passage</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jeremy Hsu]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 22:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scammers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strait of Hormuz]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Ship attacked by Iran after possibly falling for safe passage crypto scam.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Crypto scammers are targeting the thousands of ships stranded near the Strait of Hormuz—and at least one ship that faced Iranian gunfire may have been tricked into believing it had paid Iran for safe passage.</p>
<p>The first warning of such a crypto scam came from the Greek maritime risk management company MARISKS on April 20, according to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/scam-messages-offering-ships-safe-transit-through-hormuz-security-firm-warns-2026-04-21/">Reuters</a>. The company alerted shipowners that scammers posing as Iranian authorities had sent messages to shipping companies asking for “transit fee” payments in bitcoin or tether.</p>
<p>That may be particularly confusing for shipping companies because of how Iran has asserted control over the Strait of Hormuz—a vital shipping channel and maritime chokepoint that normally allows Persian Gulf countries to provide one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas supply. Iranian authorities have demanded <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/iran-demands-cryptocurrency-toll-from-tankers-passing-through-strait-of-hormuz/">cryptocurrency</a><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/iran-demands-cryptocurrency-toll-from-tankers-passing-through-strait-of-hormuz/"> payments</a> from oil tankers to pass through the waterway and required ships to follow a route near Iran’s coastline to undergo inspection.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Tanker-Strait-of-Hormuz-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Tanker-Strait-of-Hormuz-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Oil tankers and gas tankers were affected by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, leading to a global energy crisis stemming from the war in the Middle East.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Tesla reports Q1 2026 earnings: Still profitable</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-reports-q1-2026-earnings-still-profitable/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-reports-q1-2026-earnings-still-profitable/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jonathan M. Gitlin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla earnings]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-reports-q1-2026-earnings-still-profitable/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Car sales are up, battery sales and emissions credits are down.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Tesla <a href="https://assets-ir.tesla.com/tesla-contents/IR/TSLA-Q1-2026-Update.pdf">published</a> its quarterly financials ahead of an investor call this afternoon. The maker of electric vehicles has become an increasingly polarized brand but a valuable one: $1.21 trillion at the time of writing. And we knew from its delivery announcement <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-sales-grew-by-6-in-q1-but-company-has-an-overproduction-problem/">earlier in April</a> that the first quarter of 2026 was rather rosy, with sales growing by a little more than 6 percent compared to the same three months in 2025. As a result, it was a more profitable quarter than last year, making $477 million in net income.</p>
<p>Revenue increased by 16 percent year over year to $22.4 billion. Automotive revenue grew by the same percentage to $16.2 billion, and Tesla saw a 42 percent increase in services (like Supercharger fees) and other revenue. But its energy storage business shrank in Q1, and revenues from this division fell by 12 percent to $2.4 billion.</p>
<p>An operating margin of 4.2 percent is far from the double-digit margins Tesla once boasted. But things were <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/04/teslas-death-is-not-close-says-musk-as-operating-margin-drops-to-2/">twice as bad in 2025</a>. Although the company brought in more money from automotive sales, it only made $380 million from selling regulatory credits, compared to $595 million in Q1 2025. It also made less money from leasing. Operating expenses rose due to spending on AI and part of the $1 trillion compensation package <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/11/elon-musk-wins-tesla-pay-vote-that-could-make-him-a-1-trillion-man/">that shareholders approved</a> in November for CEO Elon Musk.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-reports-q1-2026-earnings-still-profitable/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-reports-q1-2026-earnings-still-profitable/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>183</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/GettyImages-2211638677-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/GettyImages-2211638677-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Stanislav Kogiku/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Will these robots justify Tesla's share price? Elon Musk says yes, but then he would, wouldn't he?</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Our newsroom AI policy</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ken Fisher]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site policy]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[How Ars Technica uses, and doesn't use, generative AI.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year, we committed to publishing a reader-facing explanation of how Ars Technica uses, and doesn't use, generative AI. Translating our internal policy into a reader-facing document that meets our standards for clarity and precision took longer than I'd have liked, but I wanted to get it right rather than get it out fast. That document is now <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai-policy/">live</a>, and you can find it below (and also linked in the footer of most pages on the site).</p>
<p>Our approach comes from two convictions: that AI cannot replace human insight, creativity, and ingenuity, and that these tools, used well, can help professionals do better work. From those starting points, it was always clear what we wouldn't allow. AI would not become the author, the illustrator, or the videographer. These tools are best used by professionals in the service of their profession, not as a clever end run around it, and certainly not as a path to eventually replacing it.</p>
<p>The short version: Ars Technica is written by humans. Our reporting, analysis, and commentary are human-authored. Where we use AI tools in our workflow, we use them with standards and oversight, and humans make every editorial decision. Our policy covers how we handle text, research, source attribution, images, audio, and video.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>250</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ars-logo-dark-background-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ars-logo-dark-background-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
</media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Lawsuit: Nintendo is getting tariff refunds—its customers should get them instead</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/lawsuit-nintendo-is-getting-tariff-refunds-its-customers-should-get-them-instead/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/lawsuit-nintendo-is-getting-tariff-refunds-its-customers-should-get-them-instead/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/lawsuit-nintendo-is-getting-tariff-refunds-its-customers-should-get-them-instead/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Lawsuit demands Nintendo pass Trump tariff refunds on to its customers.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Two gamers who want tariff refunds sued Nintendo of America yesterday, alleging that the company intends to pocket refunds received from the government instead of giving money back to consumers who paid higher prices. The <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.361585/gov.uscourts.wawd.361585.1.0.pdf">class action complaint</a> seeks to represent a class including the two named plaintiffs and all other US residents who bought Nintendo products from February 2025 to February 2026.</p>
<p>"Unless restrained by this Court, Nintendo stands to recover the same tariff payments twice—once from consumers through higher prices and again from the federal government through tariff refunds, including interest paid by the government on those funds," said the lawsuit filed in US District Court for the Western District of Washington. "Nintendo has made no legally binding commitment to return tariff-related overcharges to the consumers who actually paid them. This lawsuit seeks to prevent that unjust result."</p>
<p>The plaintiffs, California resident Gregory Hoffert and Washington resident Prashant Sharan, "paid retail prices for those goods that were increased by Nintendo to account for the tariffs imposed on imported products," and "would not have paid those higher prices absent the unlawful tariffs and Nintendo’s pass-through of those tariffs to consumers," said the complaint filed by the Emery | Reddy, PC law firm.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/lawsuit-nintendo-is-getting-tariff-refunds-its-customers-should-get-them-instead/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/lawsuit-nintendo-is-getting-tariff-refunds-its-customers-should-get-them-instead/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/nintendo-switch-1152x648-1776887603.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/nintendo-switch-500x500-1776887612.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | AFP</media:credit><media:text>A Nintendo Switch at the Nintendo Store in New York City, on April 8, 2025.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>RFK Jr. won&#039;t back CDC director on vaccines as agency scraps positive data</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-doubles-down-on-vaccine-meddling-as-cdc-junks-scientific-study/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-doubles-down-on-vaccine-meddling-as-cdc-junks-scientific-study/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Beth Mole]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert f kennedy jr]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-doubles-down-on-vaccine-meddling-as-cdc-junks-scientific-study/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Kennedy's tesimony sets up another clash over vaccines with next CDC director.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>While the Trump administration has reportedly tried to rein in Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s widely unpopular anti-vaccine agenda, the political strategy is not working when it comes to words or actions. Kennedy on Tuesday suggested he would continue to meddle with federal vaccine policy, and news broke Wednesday that his political appointees have discarded scientific data that conflicts with Kennedy's anti-vaccine views.</p>
<p>In a Congressional hearing Tuesday, Kennedy refused to commit to supporting evidence-based vaccine policy from the next director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. At the same time, he refused to say that he wouldn't interfere with the agency's recommendations.</p>
<p>Last week, Trump nominated <a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/trump-picks-qualified-normal-health-leader-to-head-cdc-experts-still-cautious/">Erica Schwartz</a> to be the next CDC director, a role that requires Senate confirmation. Schwartz is a respected physician and former public health official who has championed the use of vaccines during her distinguished career. Outside experts were pleasantly surprised by the uncontroversial choice but wary of her ability to implement evidence-based policy under Kennedy. Last year, Kennedy—who has no medical, scientific, or public health background—ousted the previous Senate-confirmed director, Susan Monarez, who was, like Schwartz, a well-qualified and respected pick for the role. Monarez testified that she was pushed out for refusing to rubber-stamp vaccine recommendations from Kennedy's hand-selected anti-vaccine advisors. Monarez lasted as CDC director for just 29 days.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-doubles-down-on-vaccine-meddling-as-cdc-junks-scientific-study/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-doubles-down-on-vaccine-meddling-as-cdc-junks-scientific-study/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>118</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2271874300-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2271874300-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty | Graeme Sloan</media:credit><media:text>Robert F. Kennedy Jr., US secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, April 21, 2026.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>You want your Moon landings in HD? So does NASA—here&#039;s how it&#039;s happening.</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/you-want-your-moon-landings-in-hdtv-so-does-nasa-heres-how-its-happening/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/you-want-your-moon-landings-in-hdtv-so-does-nasa-heres-how-its-happening/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Eric Berger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artemis II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/you-want-your-moon-landings-in-hdtv-so-does-nasa-heres-how-its-happening/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["You just push this button, and in three hours, you're counting photons."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>During most of the Artemis II mission, the crew of four astronauts beamed back low-definition video, both from inside the spacecraft and from exterior views of the Moon. It was exhilarating stuff, but in a world in which we're all watching HDTVs, it also felt a little flat.</p>
<p>This is because Orion largely communicated with Earth via radio waves, picked up by large dishes sprinkled around the world. This is pretty much the same way the Apollo spacecraft talked to Earth more than half a century ago.</p>
<p>However, unlike Apollo, the astronauts on Orion would periodically send batches of much higher-resolution data, including the stunning photographs of the far side of the Moon and the Solar eclipse observed from there. This was made possible by optical laser communications, and not just those built by NASA. The mission included a commercial component that could pave the way for vastly more data returning to Earth from space than ever before.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/you-want-your-moon-landings-in-hdtv-so-does-nasa-heres-how-its-happening/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/you-want-your-moon-landings-in-hdtv-so-does-nasa-heres-how-its-happening/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/20260311_QOGS-05229-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/20260311_QOGS-05229-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Nic Vevers/Australian National University</media:credit><media:text>Associate Professor Francis Bennett works on the Quantum Optical Ground Station.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Microsoft issues emergency update for macOS and Linux ASP.NET threat</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/microsoft-issues-emergency-update-for-macos-and-linux-asp-net-threat/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/microsoft-issues-emergency-update-for-macos-and-linux-asp-net-threat/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Dan Goodin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Biz & IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/microsoft-issues-emergency-update-for-macos-and-linux-asp-net-threat/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[When authentication fails, things can go very, very wrong.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Microsoft released an emergency patch for its ASP.NET Core to fix a high-severity vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to gain SYSTEM privileges on devices that use the Web development framework to run Linux or macOS apps.</p>
<p>The software maker <a href="https://github.com/dotnet/announcements/issues/395">said</a> Tuesday evening that the vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-40372, affects versions 10.0.0 through 10.0.6 of the <a href="https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection">Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection</a> NuGet, a package that’s part of the framework. The critical flaw stems from a faulty verification of cryptographic signatures. It can be exploited to allow unauthenticated attackers to forge authentication payloads during the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.security.cryptography.hmac?view=net-10.0#remarks">HMAC validation</a> process, which is used to verify the integrity and authenticity of data exchanged between a client and a server.</p>
<h2>Beware: Forged credentials survive patching</h2>
<p>During the time users ran a vulnerable version of the package, they were left open to an attack that would allow unauthenticated people to gain sensitive SYSTEM privileges that would allow full compromise of the underlying machine. Even after the vulnerability is patched, devices may still be compromised if authentication credentials created by a threat actor aren’t purged.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/microsoft-issues-emergency-update-for-macos-and-linux-asp-net-threat/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/microsoft-issues-emergency-update-for-macos-and-linux-asp-net-threat/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/exploit-vulnerability-security.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/exploit-vulnerability-security-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Anthropic tested removing Claude Code from the Pro plan</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-tested-removing-claude-code-from-the-pro-plan/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-tested-removing-claude-code-from-the-pro-plan/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Samuel Axon]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agentic AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokens]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-tested-removing-claude-code-from-the-pro-plan/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Untenable demand has Anthropic exploring new approaches to rationing its service.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Anthropic caused a stir among developers with what appeared to be a surprise change to its pricing plan: The company signaled that Claude Code, the popular agentic development tool, would no longer be available to subscribers on the $20-per-month Pro plan.</p>
<p>Users took to <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1srzhd7/psa_claude_pro_no_longer_lists_claude_code_as_an/">Reddit</a> and <a href="https://x.com/TheGeorgePu/status/2046705634331025855">X</a> to point out that Anthropic's pricing page for Claude explicitly showed Claude Code as not supported in the Pro plan. (It remained in the $100/month+ Max plan.) Some new users signing up for Pro subscriptions were unable to access Claude Code. Meanwhile, existing subscribers saw no interruption.</p>
<p>After speculation and frustration spread, Anthropic's head of growth, Amol Avasare, <a href="https://x.com/TheAmolAvasare/status/2046724659039932830">took to social media to clarify</a> that this was a "small test on ~2% of new prosumer signups." As for the reasoning, he explained:</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-tested-removing-claude-code-from-the-pro-plan/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-tested-removing-claude-code-from-the-pro-plan/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/claude-code-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/claude-code-500x500-1774983656.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Samuel Axon</media:credit><media:text>A screenshot of Claude Code running in the command line.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>