<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >
    <channel>
        <title>Ars Technica</title>
        <atom:link href="https://arstechnica.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://arstechnica.com</link>
        <description>Serving the Technologist since 1998. News, reviews, and analysis.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:14:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>
            hourly        </sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>
            1        </sy:updateFrequency>
        
 
            <item>
                <title>Heart protection from COVID shots remains amid updates, study finds</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/covid-vaccines-still-protect-against-heart-problems-large-study-finds/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/covid-vaccines-still-protect-against-heart-problems-large-study-finds/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Beth Mole]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiovascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19 vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stroke]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/covid-vaccines-still-protect-against-heart-problems-large-study-finds/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Despite continued benefits, anti-vaccine rhetoric has driven down vaccination. ]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Although most Americans have eschewed seasonal COVID-19 vaccines, the updated shots continue to show significant protection against cardiovascular disease, especially for those over age 75 and those with underlying medical conditions. That's according to <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2850241">a new study</a> that pulled data from more than 1 million patients in a US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health system.</p>
<p>The finding builds on previous data showing that the vaccines significantly lower the risk of COVID-19-associated cardiovascular risks, particularly heart attacks and strokes. But it wasn't a given that the benefit would hold up over time—as the virus evolved, the vaccines were updated, population-level immunity increased from previous infection and vaccination, and risk of severe outcomes fell.</p>
<p>The new study, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, found that the 2024–2025 COVID-19 vaccine continued to protect against COVID-19-associated "major adverse cardiovascular events" (MACE), which include cardiovascular death, heart attack, stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/covid-vaccines-still-protect-against-heart-problems-large-study-finds/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/covid-vaccines-still-protect-against-heart-problems-large-study-finds/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/GettyImages-1232060072-1152x648.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/GettyImages-1232060072-500x500.jpeg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty | Bloomberg</media:credit><media:text>A healthcare worker administers a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine inside the Viejas Arena on the campus of San Diego State University in San Diego on Thursday, April 1, 2021. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>UK to ban social media for kids under 16, may impose overnight curfews</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/uk-to-ban-social-media-for-kids-under-16-may-impose-overnight-curfews/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/uk-to-ban-social-media-for-kids-under-16-may-impose-overnight-curfews/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 20:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online safety act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/uk-to-ban-social-media-for-kids-under-16-may-impose-overnight-curfews/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Critics say bans push kids to riskier alternatives and can be beaten with VPNs.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The UK government <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/social-media-to-be-banned-for-under-16s-in-landmark-government-move-to-givekids-their-childhood-back">announced</a> today that it will ban social media for all kids under the age of 16 in rules expected to take effect in spring 2027. The ban will apply to platforms including Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and X.</p>
<p>"We’re going further than any country in the world by banning social media for under-16s and putting wider protections in place to give kids their childhood back," Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in the announcement.</p>
<p>In addition to the ban on social media, Starmer's government said it will impose "world-leading blocks on harmful functions such as livestreaming and stranger communication with children for under-16s... Restrictions on these functionalities will also be on by default for 16- and 17-year-olds to prevent a cliff-edge at 16." The livestreaming and stranger-contact rules would apply to a range of services, such as online gaming.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/uk-to-ban-social-media-for-kids-under-16-may-impose-overnight-curfews/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/uk-to-ban-social-media-for-kids-under-16-may-impose-overnight-curfews/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/social-apps-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/social-apps-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | lixu</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Chipmaker Nvidia seeks to raise over $25B in first bond deal since 2021</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/chipmaker-nvidia-seeks-to-raise-over-25b-in-first-bond-deal-since-2021/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/chipmaker-nvidia-seeks-to-raise-over-25b-in-first-bond-deal-since-2021/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Michelle Chan and Tim Bradshaw, Financial Times]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 19:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/chipmaker-nvidia-seeks-to-raise-over-25b-in-first-bond-deal-since-2021/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Debt sale set to test investor appetite for further exposure to AI sector amid a deluge of borrowing.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Chipmaker Nvidia is planning to sell $25 billion of investment-grade debt in the US on Monday, its first bond sale in five years, in a test of investor appetite for further exposure to the AI sector.</p>
<p>In a marquee seven-part bond offering, the company will issue a wide range of maturities from two years to 30 years, according to a term sheet seen by the FT.</p>
<p>The issuance was upsized from $20 billion after receiving more than $85 billion in orders by early afternoon in New York, according to people familiar with the deal.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/chipmaker-nvidia-seeks-to-raise-over-25b-in-first-bond-deal-since-2021/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/chipmaker-nvidia-seeks-to-raise-over-25b-in-first-bond-deal-since-2021/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/nvidia-chip-1152x648-1754500479.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/nvidia-chip-500x500-1754500471.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | VCG </media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>A Chinese rocket breaks apart dangerously close to the Starlink constellation</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/a-chinese-rocket-breaks-apart-dangerously-close-to-the-starlink-constellation/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/a-chinese-rocket-breaks-apart-dangerously-close-to-the-starlink-constellation/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Stephen Clark]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LandSpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space debris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space junk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starlink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zhuque-2]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/a-chinese-rocket-breaks-apart-dangerously-close-to-the-starlink-constellation/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The rocket's breakup likely generated 100 to 150 new pieces of space junk.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The upper stage from a commercial Chinese rocket that launched last week has broken apart in space, spreading debris in a heavily trafficked part of low-Earth orbit home to the International Space Station and a significant portion of SpaceX's Starlink broadband network.</p>
<p>The breakup occurred shortly after the Zhuque-2E rocket reached orbit on June 9 with two satellites providing direct-to-cell communications, perhaps around the time the upper stage was expected to perform a disposal burn. The US Space Force confirmed the breakup event in a post on <a href="https://www.space-track.org/">space-track.org</a>, a website used by the military to distribute orbit data to the public.</p>
<p>"The tracked pieces are being incorporated into routine conjunction assessment to support spaceflight safety," the Space Force wrote in an advisory. "There are currently no threats to human spaceflight. Analysis is ongoing."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/a-chinese-rocket-breaks-apart-dangerously-close-to-the-starlink-constellation/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/a-chinese-rocket-breaks-apart-dangerously-close-to-the-starlink-constellation/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-2280560778-1152x648-1781545304.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-2280560778-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Wang Heng/Xinhua via Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>A Zhuque-2E rocket climbs into space from a commercial launch zone at the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in northwestern China.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Fox’s $22B Roku acquisition aims to expand its reach into smart TVs, advertising</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/foxs-22b-roku-acquisition-aims-to-expand-its-reach-into-smart-tvs-advertising/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/foxs-22b-roku-acquisition-aims-to-expand-its-reach-into-smart-tvs-advertising/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Scharon Harding]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVs]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/foxs-22b-roku-acquisition-aims-to-expand-its-reach-into-smart-tvs-advertising/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Fox plans to take over Roku's streaming hardware, OS, and FAST services. ]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Fox Corporation has agreed to buy Roku Inc. for $160 per share, an approximate enterprise value of $22 billion, the firms announced today.</p>
<p>The acquisition would unite Fox’s broadcast channels, including Fox, Fox News, Fox Business, and FS1, as well as its streaming businesses, including Tubi, a free ad-supported streaming television (FAST) platform that Fox bought in 2020, with Roku’s own FAST service, The Roku Channel, and Roku’s streaming hardware business, including its streaming sticks and smart TVs. Roku says it has 100 million households using its platform.</p>
<p>The most valuable part of Roku’s business isn't its hardware, which lost $19.1 million in the quarter ending March 31, 2026, but its the operating system (Roku OS) and advertising business. In that same quarter, Roku’s advertising and subscriptions business posted a gross profit of $584.1 million, with the advertising business pulling in $371 million in revenue. The COVID-19 pandemic helped Roku become profitable in 2021, but the company didn’t see annual <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/rokus-new-ad-deals-and-cost-cuts-help-it-end-a-three-year-profit-slide-0c5678ad">profitability again until 2025</a>.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/foxs-22b-roku-acquisition-aims-to-expand-its-reach-into-smart-tvs-advertising/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/foxs-22b-roku-acquisition-aims-to-expand-its-reach-into-smart-tvs-advertising/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-1322884883-1152x648-1781545400.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-1322884883-500x500-1781545392.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty</media:credit><media:text>Roku sign and logo on the modern facade of  its consumer electronics and broadcast media company headquarters in Silicon Valley - San Jose, California, USA - 2021.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Users cry foul after AMD stripped memory crypto from its consumer CPUs</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/users-cry-foul-after-amd-stripped-memory-crypto-from-its-consumer-cpus/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/users-cry-foul-after-amd-stripped-memory-crypto-from-its-consumer-cpus/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Dan Goodin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Biz & IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparent Secure Memory Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsme]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/users-cry-foul-after-amd-stripped-memory-crypto-from-its-consumer-cpus/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[AMD's stripping of TSME from consumer CPUs appears to be a deliberate, covert move.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>A decade ago, AMD added a protection to its high-end CPUs to protect them against <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_boot_attack">cold boot</a> attacks and other types of physical exploits that siphon sensitive data out of the connected memory chips. Short for Transparent Secure Memory Encryption, TSME encrypts the entire contents stored in memory, making the data useless to physical attackers.</p>
<p>Over time, AMD added TSME to lower-end processors, including the consumer version of its Ryzen chips, a CPU that costs less than the Pro version. Over the years, users of these lower-end chips have gotten used to the added security. Recently and without warning or notice, this lower-end line of AMD chips suddenly dropped the protection, and did so in a way that was impossible to detect on Windows machines and required a fair amount of technical work when using Linux.</p>
<h2>Now you see it, now you don't</h2>
<p>AMD has yet to say why TSME worked on these CPUs, or even to confirm the change. AMD declined to answer questions sent by email other than to say TSME "is a security feature only applied to PRO CPUs as part of AMD PRO Technologies." The statement is the first known time the chipmaker has explicitly made this restriction public.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/users-cry-foul-after-amd-stripped-memory-crypto-from-its-consumer-cpus/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/users-cry-foul-after-amd-stripped-memory-crypto-from-its-consumer-cpus/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IMG_7105-1152x648-1769617334.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IMG_7105-500x500-1769617347.jpeg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Andrew Cunningham</media:credit><media:text>AMD's Ryzen 7 9850X3D.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>20 years of Intel Macs: Why Apple switched, and why it switched again</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/20-years-of-intel-macs-why-apple-switched-and-why-it-switched-again/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/20-years-of-intel-macs-why-apple-switched-and-why-it-switched-again/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Andrew Cunningham]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple silicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Air]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/20-years-of-intel-macs-why-apple-switched-and-why-it-switched-again/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Remembering the ups and downs of the Intel Mac era as it finally winds down.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The release of macOS 27 later this fall won't <em>quite</em> close the book on the Intel Mac. The last handful of models that could run macOS 26 Tahoe will be eligible for security and Safari updates for two more years, and elements of the Rosetta compatibility layer for running Intel code on Apple Silicon Macs will be with us in some form for some indeterminate amount of time after that.</p>
<p>But macOS 26 is definitely the last chapter of the Intel Mac story. Anything that happens after this is a coda or an epilogue.</p>
<p>Most of our WWDC coverage has been forward-looking, so indulge us if you will in a look backward at the full history of the Intel Mac, a partnership between two companies that made Macs dramatically better, until it started making them worse.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/20-years-of-intel-macs-why-apple-switched-and-why-it-switched-again/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/20-years-of-intel-macs-why-apple-switched-and-why-it-switched-again/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Steve-Jobs-announces-Intel-processor-GettyImages-53028118-1152x648-1781292898.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Steve-Jobs-announces-Intel-processor-GettyImages-53028118-500x500-1781292888.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>David Paul Morris/Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Apple's then-CEO Steve Jobs talking about the Mac's transition to Intel processors in 2005.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Good news—we have extra time before the Sun ends life on Earth</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/good-news-we-have-extra-time-before-the-sun-ends-life-on-earth/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/good-news-we-have-extra-time-before-the-sun-ends-life-on-earth/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Scott K. Johnson]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrobiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red giant]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/good-news-we-have-extra-time-before-the-sun-ends-life-on-earth/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Will the Sun roast Earth’s plants or starve them?]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>It’s a bit worrying when a scientific paper begins, “How long will life on Earth survive?” But in this case—a study by Jacob Haqq‐Misra of Blue Marble Space and Eric Wolf at the University of Colorado Boulder—the billion-plus-year timeline under consideration shouldn’t cause you too much existential panic.</p>
<p>The context for this question is that we understand the Sun will brighten as it eventually matures into a red giant that swallows the Earth in a solar furnace. So, where along that 5 billion-year path will life on Earth, in fact, be cooked?</p>
<h2>Weathering and the weather</h2>
<p>This isn’t just a question of incoming radiation. Among the thermostat-like stabilizing feedback loops in Earth’s climate, the cycling of CO<sub>2</sub> through the solid Earth is a major factor over timescales this long. The weathering of silicate rocks at the surface converts atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> into carbonate that ends up on the seafloor, where it can be subducted into the mantle with tectonic plates. (And eventually, it can cycle back out to the atmosphere through volcanoes.)</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/good-news-we-have-extra-time-before-the-sun-ends-life-on-earth/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/good-news-we-have-extra-time-before-the-sun-ends-life-on-earth/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/sun_nasas_flareF-1920-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/sun_nasas_flareF-1920-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>NASA/GSFC/SDO</media:credit><media:text>The Sun will, someday, be a real jerk.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>F1 in Spain: An old-fashioned strategy fight can still be thrilling</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/f1-in-spain-an-old-fashioned-strategy-fight-can-still-be-thrilling/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/f1-in-spain-an-old-fashioned-strategy-fight-can-still-be-thrilling/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jonathan M. Gitlin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Formula 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spain]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/f1-in-spain-an-old-fashioned-strategy-fight-can-still-be-thrilling/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Armed with a ton of new upgrades, Ferrari came to Spain full of confidence.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Formula 1 raced in Spain this past weekend. The Barcelona-Catalunya circuit is one of F1's purpose-built race tracks, with a number of fast corners and a track surface that's more abrasive than usual. That means downforce is the name of the game. Catalunya has always required good aerodynamics, but it's doubly important now. The more speed you can carry through a corner, the less energy you have to add on the following straight, and energy management is now as important in F1 as it is at <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/the-biggest-race-in-the-world-the-24-hours-of-le-mans-is-this-weekend/">Le Mans</a> or in Formula E or even IndyCar. And the more downforce you have, the less the car slides, and the less the car slides, the less the tires get eaten up.</p>
<p>It's the tire wear that suggested the strategies. So far, all the races this season have been one-stop affairs as drivers make their required change from one tire compound to another. But 66 laps of Catalunya would require at least three sets of Pirelli tires to get to the end. Maybe even four. As the tires wear, they become slower, to the tune of 0.2–0.3 seconds per lap. And one way to exploit that is with an "undercut"—pit early, change onto fresh rubber, and make use of the tire offset against your rivals to put in fast laps while they're losing time. Do it right, and when they make their next pit stop, you should be in front.</p>
<p>Splitting the race into four stints means one more pit stop, and it costs about 22 seconds to drive through the pit lane, stop in the box, and then exit the pit lane again, assuming a tire change in less than three seconds. But since each set of tires is needed for fewer laps, they can be worked hard enough to offset that 22-second pit stop and more.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/f1-in-spain-an-old-fashioned-strategy-fight-can-still-be-thrilling/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/f1-in-spain-an-old-fashioned-strategy-fight-can-still-be-thrilling/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-2281551814-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-2281551814-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Mark Thompson/Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Lewis Hamilton's Ferrari after the 2026 Spanish Grand Prix.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Russia appears set to finally address long-term, serious space station cracks</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/russia-appears-set-to-finally-address-long-term-serious-space-station-cracks/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/russia-appears-set-to-finally-address-long-term-serious-space-station-cracks/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Eric Berger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roscosmos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/russia-appears-set-to-finally-address-long-term-serious-space-station-cracks/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[This has been a persistent, behind-the-scenes dispute between NASA and Roscosmos.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Ten days ago, in a moment of very high drama in orbit, <a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/work-on-russias-leaky-space-station-module-causes-astronauts-to-take-shelter/">NASA directed its astronauts</a> living on the International Space Station to briefly seek emergency refuge in a Crew Dragon spacecraft.</p>
<p>Since then, neither the US space agency nor Roscosmos has provided additional public information about the situation in orbit. But according to sources who spoke to Ars, following the spectacle in space, the problem has been successfully fixed.</p>
<p>At issue were persistent cracks in a small area of the International Space Station attached to the Russian Zvezda service module, known as the PrK module. The problem has been ongoing since 2019, and Russian astronauts have been attempting various fixes, often using a sealant called Germetall-1.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/russia-appears-set-to-finally-address-long-term-serious-space-station-cracks/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/russia-appears-set-to-finally-address-long-term-serious-space-station-cracks/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-71395189-1024x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1024" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-71395189-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>NASA via Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>The Russian Progress 21 cargo ship is seen docked to the station's Zvezda service module in the center of the photograph.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Did a medieval flying monk spot Halley&#039;s comet, twice? It&#039;s complicated</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/did-a-medieval-flying-monk-spot-halleys-comet-twice-its-complicated/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/did-a-medieval-flying-monk-spot-halleys-comet-twice-its-complicated/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jennifer Ouellette]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 16:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eilmer of Malmesbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halley's comet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medieval history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science history]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/did-a-medieval-flying-monk-spot-halleys-comet-twice-its-complicated/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[University of Leicester historian thinks Eilmer of Malmesbury saw two different comets: in 1018 and 1066.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p style="font-weight: 400;">Early in the 11th century, a young Benedictine monk <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eilmer_of_Malmesbury">named Eilmer</a> jumped from the 150-foot tower of his abbey in the small English town of Malmesbury, wearing a pair of crude wings he’d fashioned from willow wood and cloth. Eilmer managed to glide a good 600 feet, passing over the city wall before crash-landing in a small valley near the river Avon. The fall broke both his legs, crippling him. Malmesbury Abbey still boasts a stained-glass window in honor of Brother Eilmer.</p>
<p>This legendary experiment in medieval aviation comes to us via 12th-century historian <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_of_Malmesbury">William of Malmesbury</a> in an account written circa 1125, although William neglected to provide future historians with an exact date for the feat. But William does mention another key episode in Eilmer's life when the monk was "advanced in years": Eilmer witnessed Halley's comet in 1066, commenting, "It is long since I saw you." Some historians <a href="https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/news/2026/01/halleys-comet-wrongly-named-11th-century-english-monk-predates-british-astronomer">have interpreted</a> this to mean that Eilmer saw Halley's comet on an earlier fly-by in 989, when he would have been a young boy.</p>
<p>Assuming Eilmer was at least 5 years old in 989, he would have been born no later than 984. This would make Eilmer in his 80s in 1066, with his attempt at flight—which occurred when he was "in his first youth"—likely falling between 1000 and 1010. However, it's an estimate that is based on a lot of assumptions, according to James Aitcheson of the University of Leicester, who argues in <a href="https://academic.oup.com/nq/advance-article/doi/10.1093/notesj/gjag066/8671576?login=false">a paper</a> published in the journal Notes and Queries that Eilmer may have seen a different comet altogether in his youth—the comet of 1018. If so, he would have been born much later, and the date of his flight would have occurred between the 1020s and 1040s.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/did-a-medieval-flying-monk-spot-halleys-comet-twice-its-complicated/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/did-a-medieval-flying-monk-spot-halleys-comet-twice-its-complicated/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>136</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/eilmer-1152x648-1781448851.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/eilmer-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Andrew Dunn/CC BY-SA 2.0</media:credit><media:text>Stained glass window at Malmesbury Abbey depicting the medieval "flying monk," Eilmer</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Review: Disclosure Day is big on action, light on ideas</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/06/review-disclosure-day-is-big-on-action-light-on-ideas/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/06/review-disclosure-day-is-big-on-action-light-on-ideas/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jennifer Ouellette]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 17:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/06/review-disclosure-day-is-big-on-action-light-on-ideas/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[There's nothing new or surprising, but it's still an entertaining film from one of our greatest directors.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The summer blockbuster season has <a href="https://deadline.com/2026/06/box-office-global-disclosure-day-1236955715/">kicked off</a> in earnest with the theatrical release of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclosure_Day"><em>Disclosure Day</em></a>, director Steven Spielberg’s highly anticipated return to his “aliens are among us” sci-fi roots. Verdict: There's not much fresh or original here as movies about aliens go, but it's a fast-paced film with a luminous performance by Emily Blunt that won't fail to entertain.</p>
<p><strong>(Some spoilers below but no major reveals.)</strong></p>
<p>The first half of the film is essentially a political thriller—shades of 1974's <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Parallax_View"><em>The Parallax View</em></a> and similar films—as global tensions have the world teetering on the brink of World War III. A cybersecurity specialist named Daniel (Josh O'Connor) has stolen a piece of alien technology and highly classified files from his employer, Wardex Corporation, a top-secret extension of the US government led by Noah Scanlon (Colin Firth). Scanlon flushes out Daniel by holding his girlfriend Jane (Eve Hewson) hostage. At the trade-off, Daniel double-crosses them and escapes with Jane, and the two go on the run as Scanlon declares Daniel a traitor.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/06/review-disclosure-day-is-big-on-action-light-on-ideas/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/06/review-disclosure-day-is-big-on-action-light-on-ideas/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/day7-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/day7-500x500-1781361104.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Universal Pictures</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Threads of underground fungal networks are long enough to reach beyond the Solar System</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/threads-of-underground-fungal-networks-are-long-enough-to-reach-beyond-the-solar-system/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/threads-of-underground-fungal-networks-are-long-enough-to-reach-beyond-the-solar-system/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Wyatt Myskow, Inside Climate News]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 11:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mushrooms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/threads-of-underground-fungal-networks-are-long-enough-to-reach-beyond-the-solar-system/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Researchers have quantified the length and mass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal networks globally.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Hidden underground around the world lie 110 quadrillion kilometers of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal networks—webs of ultra-thin threads that, if connected in a single line, would stretch almost a billion times the distance between the Earth and the sun, according to new research published in Science on Thursday.</p>
<p>These fungal communities form intimate relationships with the roots of plants, which they provide with nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen in exchange for carbon, 1 billion tons of which the networks sequester underground annually, previous research has found. If the fungal network wasn’t storing it, that carbon would be warming the atmosphere.</p>
<p>But those networks have never been mapped globally until now. The <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adu4373">new study</a> led by <a href="https://www.spun.earth/?r=0">Society for the Protection of Underground Networks</a>, or SPUN, an organization founded to map mycorrhizal fungi networks, used a combination of literature review, soil samples from around the globe, machine learning and laboratory testing to estimate the distribution and mass of these systems and <a href="https://spun-625.pages.dev/story/a-hidden-infrastructure">map</a> where they are densest.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/threads-of-underground-fungal-networks-are-long-enough-to-reach-beyond-the-solar-system/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/threads-of-underground-fungal-networks-are-long-enough-to-reach-beyond-the-solar-system/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-1164060198-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-1164060198-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>HHelene via Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Fungus mycelium growing on a decaying trunk.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Anthropic shuts down Fable, Mythos models following Trump admin directive</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/anthropic-shuts-down-fable-mythos-models-following-trump-admin-directive/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/anthropic-shuts-down-fable-mythos-models-following-trump-admin-directive/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Kyle Orland]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 03:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropic Claude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fable 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mythos 5]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/anthropic-shuts-down-fable-mythos-models-following-trump-admin-directive/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Commerce dept. worries that a Fable 5 "jailbreak" could be a national security threat.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Anthropic completely shut off access to its Mythos 5 and Fable 5 models Friday night, just days after they were launched.</p>
<p>The move comes after Anthropic's receipt of a US Commerce Department directive Friday evening, subjecting the new models to export controls restricting their use anywhere outside the United States. In <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/fable-mythos-access">a message posted Friday night</a>, Anthropic said the only way for it to ensure compliance with that government order in the immediate term "is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers." Access to other Anthropic models is not affected.</p>
<p>An <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/06/12/anthropic-trump-mythos-fable-national-security">Axios report</a> cited an administration official saying that the administration is concerned by reports of a jailbreak that reportedly gets around <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/anthropic-says-these-topics-are-too-dangerous-to-let-its-fable-5-model-talk-about/">broad classifier-based safeguards</a> meant to block Fable 5 prompts regarding cybersecurity, chemistry, and biology. The administration reportedly requested a pause in the release of these models to gain time for the "national security apparatus" to be "hardened" against this kind of threat. That hardening could be complete "in the next few weeks," Axios' source suggested.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/anthropic-shuts-down-fable-mythos-models-following-trump-admin-directive/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/anthropic-shuts-down-fable-mythos-models-following-trump-admin-directive/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>197</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/fable5-1152x648.webp" type="image/webp" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/fable5-500x500-1781319492.webp" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Anthropic</media:credit><media:text>The butterfly imagery is a little ironic now that Anthropic's Fable 5 model can't fly free...</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>SpaceX is now a public company valued for its AI potential, so what comes next?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/spacex-is-now-a-public-company-valued-for-its-ai-potential-so-what-comes-next/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/spacex-is-now-a-public-company-valued-for-its-ai-potential-so-what-comes-next/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Eric Berger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 22:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spacex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starship]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/spacex-is-now-a-public-company-valued-for-its-ai-potential-so-what-comes-next/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[As of today, SpaceX is owned by investors who will want to see it make money.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Space Exploration Technologies, better known simply as SpaceX, became a publicly traded company on Friday nearly a quarter of a century after it was founded.</p>
<p>The company began trading on the NASDAQ exchange in New York City at $135 a share, valuing SpaceX at nearly $1.8 trillion. By the end of the trading day the company's shares were selling at $160.95, a respectable increase of more than 19 percent.</p>
<p>On paper, SpaceX founder Elon Musk became the world's first trillionaire, with his personal stake in the company valued at more than $700 billion. Because of the company's stock options plan, thousands of current and former employees became <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/technology/spacex-ipo-employee-millionaires.html?campaign_id=4&amp;emc=edit_dk_20260612&amp;instance_id=177077&amp;nl=dealbook&amp;regi_id=77722883&amp;segment_id=221404&amp;user_id=d5e9cff6cf0c03ffbb9921bcd45f630c">overnight millionaires</a>. Employees at SpaceX have worked remarkably hard over the last 24 years, and now they will be richly compensated for having done so.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/spacex-is-now-a-public-company-valued-for-its-ai-potential-so-what-comes-next/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/spacex-is-now-a-public-company-valued-for-its-ai-potential-so-what-comes-next/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>356</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-2281248250-1024x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1024" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-2281248250-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Spencer Platt/Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell  (center right) celebrates with family and other SpaceX employees at the Nasdaq Marketsite in Times Square during the launch of the SpaceX initial public offering.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>PeopleSoft 0-day affecting hundreds of organizations steals gigabytes of data</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/peoplesoft-0-day-affecting-hundreds-of-organizations-steals-gigabytes-of-data/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/peoplesoft-0-day-affecting-hundreds-of-organizations-steals-gigabytes-of-data/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Dan Goodin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 19:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Biz & IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PeopleSoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ShinyHunters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zerodays]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/peoplesoft-0-day-affecting-hundreds-of-organizations-steals-gigabytes-of-data/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Vulnerability in the Oracle-owned PeopleSoft software is about as critical as they come.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>One of the world’s most active ransomware groups exploited a critical vulnerability in Oracle’s PeopleSoft software suite and used it to target about 100 customers and extort at least one of them to pay up in exchange for not leaking stolen data, researchers said.</p>
<p>The group, tracked as ShinyHunters, had been exploiting the PeopleSoft vulnerability for more than two weeks before Oracle <a href="https://blogs.oracle.com/security/security-alert-cve-2026-35273-released">flagged</a> it. CVE-2026-35273, as the vulnerability is tracked, carries a severity rating of 9.8 out of 10, making the former zero-day one of the year’s most critical vulnerabilities to be exploited.</p>
<p>Google’s Mandiant security team <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/shinyhunters-targets-education-sector-oracle-exploit">said</a> it’s an SSRF (server-side request forgery), a vulnerability that allows attackers to send requests from a susceptible server to systems used by the targeted organization. Oracle said the SSRF is remotely exploitable, and the company has issued a stopgap mitigation but has yet to fully patch the flaw. Google has confirmed that victims are receiving extortion demands.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/peoplesoft-0-day-affecting-hundreds-of-organizations-steals-gigabytes-of-data/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/peoplesoft-0-day-affecting-hundreds-of-organizations-steals-gigabytes-of-data/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GettyImages-1867844462-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GettyImages-1867844462-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Mesut Dogan</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Controversial FISA spying law expires tonight. The spying will continue.</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/controversial-fisa-spying-law-expires-tonight-the-spying-will-continue/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/controversial-fisa-spying-law-expires-tonight-the-spying-will-continue/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 702]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrantless surveillance]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/controversial-fisa-spying-law-expires-tonight-the-spying-will-continue/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Section 702 of FISA to expire tonight, but certification lasts until March 2027.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) is set to expire at midnight tonight after Congress failed to pass an extension of the controversial spying law. But that doesn't mean the government's spying powers will disappear.</p>
<p>Surveillance under Section 702 of FISA "operates under yearlong certifications approved by the FISA Court," the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law <a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/media/15756/download/bcj-updated-702-deadline-myth-one-pager.pdf?inline=1">explained</a> this week. The current certification will remain in place until March 2027 under the yearlong certification issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court on March 17, 2026.</p>
<p>"In order to pressure members to accept a bill without meaningful reforms, surveillance hawks are claiming that Section 702 surveillance will 'go dark' on June 12 if Congress hasn’t renewed the law," the Brennan Center said. "Contrary to that claim, Congress planned for potential lapses and made very clear that Section 702 surveillance may continue under existing certifications even if the statute sunsets. Members must not be fearmongered into passing a reauthorization without protecting Americans from warrantless government access to their private communications."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/controversial-fisa-spying-law-expires-tonight-the-spying-will-continue/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/controversial-fisa-spying-law-expires-tonight-the-spying-will-continue/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/spy-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/spy-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | Richard Drury</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Here&#039;s what Jeff Bezos&#039; new startup Prometheus will do</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/heres-what-jeff-bezos-new-startup-prometheus-will-do/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/heres-what-jeff-bezos-new-startup-prometheus-will-do/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Samuel Axon]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bezos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project prometheus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prometheus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vik Bajaj]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/heres-what-jeff-bezos-new-startup-prometheus-will-do/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[It isn't the only startup tackling physical AI, but it's one of the best-funded.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>In November, Jeff Bezos announced that he would become co-CEO of a <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/11/with-a-new-company-jeff-bezos-will-become-a-ceo-again/">new startup called Prometheus.</a> At the time, the startup said it would focus on "physical AI"—an increasingly common term for applying the same deep learning principles behind large language models or generative AI to things like robotics and manufacturing—but specifics were scarce. Now, with a major new round of funding, Bezos and co-founder Vik Bajaj have talked about it in slightly more detail.</p>
<p>The funding round is significant—$12 billion now, after an initial round of $6.2 billion last year, for a valuation of $41 billion. The funding comes from JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, and others, plus a sizable amount from Bezos' coffers. The startup currently employs 150 people.</p>
<p>Much of that funding will be put toward buying compute. "O<!-- obsidian -->ne of the reasons we’ve had to raise a significant amount of funding is because... what we’re doing is very compute-intensive and we need to create that data," Bezos <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/11/project-prometheus-bezos-bajaj-live-updates.html">told</a> CNBC.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/heres-what-jeff-bezos-new-startup-prometheus-will-do/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/heres-what-jeff-bezos-new-startup-prometheus-will-do/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bezos-Bajaj-Prometheus-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bezos-Bajaj-Prometheus-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>CNBC</media:credit><media:text>Prometheus co-founders Jeff Bezos and Vik Bajaj sitting for an interview with CNBC.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Have politics finally come for the National Academies of Science?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/have-politics-finally-come-for-the-national-academies-of-science/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/have-politics-finally-come-for-the-national-academies-of-science/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[John Timmer]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Academies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather attribution]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/have-politics-finally-come-for-the-national-academies-of-science/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[A pending report on climate attribution may be setting the stage for conflict.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Founded during the US Civil War to provide advice to the government, the National Academies of Science have become one of the most prestigious scientific organizations. Its primary function is to prepare comprehensive reports on scientific and technological issues, aided by its ability to attract top talent from across the country.</p>
<p>Those reports have not been afraid to weigh in on <a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2009/02/national-academies-we-need-better-science-in-the-courtroom/">matters of public controversy</a> and risk offending powerful groups, which it has managed to do without losing the respect of the governmental organizations that fund these reports. But this year, there have been increasing signs that the Academies' ability to dodge political firestorms has reached its limit. Yesterday, a <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/11/fossil-fuels-national-academies-climate-science-00897237">deeply reported story</a> from Politico explained the breakdown between the National Academies and Republican politicians.</p>
<p>The National Academies is preparing an expert report on attribution of weather events to human-driven climate change, and fossil fuel companies are worried it will lead to findings of liability in the many cases where those companies are being sued.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/have-politics-finally-come-for-the-national-academies-of-science/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/have-politics-finally-come-for-the-national-academies-of-science/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-1845540332-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-1845540332-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>csfotoimages</media:credit><media:text>The National Academies of Science building in Washington, DC.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Ukraine&#039;s one-time test used fully autonomous drones to kill Russian soldiers</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/ukraines-one-time-test-used-fully-autonomous-drones-to-kill-russian-soldiers/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/ukraines-one-time-test-used-fully-autonomous-drones-to-kill-russian-soldiers/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jeremy Hsu]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia invasion of Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian war on Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine war]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/ukraines-one-time-test-used-fully-autonomous-drones-to-kill-russian-soldiers/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Full autonomy is rare, but Ukraine is installing AI modules on drones and robots.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Fully autonomous drones killed Russian soldiers during a battlefield test two years ago, according to a Ukrainian drone manufacturer. If true, the incident would represent another milestone in a war that has spurred unprecedented developments in military drones, robots, and AI-guided weaponry.</p>
<p>The one-time test was revealed by Alexander Kokhanovskyy, CEO of the Ukrainian drone maker Aero Center, during an <a href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/2529849-fully-autonomous-drones-have-killed-human-soldiers-for-the-first-time/">interview with New Scientist</a> at a press event hosted by the Ukrainian embassy in London. Kokhanovskyy described the test—which did not involve his current company Aero Center—using quadcopter drones that were preprogrammed to fly to a front-line area before activating an AI-powered “Terminator mode” that would seek out and attack any target in the given area.</p>
<p>There was apparently no video feed or anything else to show what the “Terminator” drones targeted and attacked. But Kokhanovskyy told New Scientist that human-piloted drones sent to check out the aftermath found “a couple” of dead Russian soldiers, which led to the conclusion that the fully autonomous drones had killed them.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/ukraines-one-time-test-used-fully-autonomous-drones-to-kill-russian-soldiers/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/ukraines-one-time-test-used-fully-autonomous-drones-to-kill-russian-soldiers/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>150</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Ukraine-drone-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Ukraine-drone-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Francisco Richart/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Ukrainian soldier with a reconnaissance drone on the Sumy front in January 2026.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>