<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >
    <channel>
        <title>Ars Technica</title>
        <atom:link href="https://arstechnica.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://arstechnica.com</link>
        <description>Serving the Technologist since 1998. News, reviews, and analysis.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 20:28:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>
            hourly        </sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>
            1        </sy:updateFrequency>
        
 
            <item>
                <title>Ted Cruz and Ron Wyden try to fight censorship with bipartisan JAWBONE Act</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/ted-cruz-and-ron-wyden-try-to-fight-censorship-with-bipartisan-jawbone-act/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/ted-cruz-and-ron-wyden-try-to-fight-censorship-with-bipartisan-jawbone-act/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 19:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brendan carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ted cruz]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/ted-cruz-and-ron-wyden-try-to-fight-censorship-with-bipartisan-jawbone-act/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Cruz/Wyden bill would help Americans sue federal officials over censorship.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>US Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) today introduced the JAWBONE Act, a proposed law that could fuel lawsuits against federal officials who try to coerce broadcasters or tech platforms into restricting speech.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/JAWBONE-Act.pdf">Justice Against Weaponized Bureaucratic Overreach to Networked Expression Act</a> would prohibit federal agencies and employees from coercing or trying to coerce broadcasters and providers of online services or AI services into changing content. The bill could apply to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr's repeated attempts to pressure TV networks and broadcasters, or government pressure imposed on social media firms and <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/07/gop-ignores-groks-right-wing-bias-in-anti-woke-chatbot-fight-democrat-claims/">AI chatbot makers</a>.</p>
<p>The bill would create a private right of action for victims of "jawboning," letting people recover compensatory damages in court. Individuals whose speech is stifled could bring cases against government officials, and the proposed law could be enforced by state attorneys general through civil actions.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/ted-cruz-and-ron-wyden-try-to-fight-censorship-with-bipartisan-jawbone-act/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/ted-cruz-and-ron-wyden-try-to-fight-censorship-with-bipartisan-jawbone-act/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ted-cruz-ron-wyden-1152x648-1781205333.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ted-cruz-ron-wyden-500x500-1781205347.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | Tom Williams</media:credit><media:text>US Senators Ted Cruz (center) and Ron Wyden (back left) in the US Capitol on April 5, 2022. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>AcuRite admits new app falls short, delays old app’s May shutdown to fix problems</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/iot-gadget-firm-acurite-delays-forced-app-migration-due-to-new-apps-shortfalls/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/iot-gadget-firm-acurite-delays-forced-app-migration-due-to-new-apps-shortfalls/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Scharon Harding]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 19:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AcuRite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bethesda Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/iot-gadget-firm-acurite-delays-forced-app-migration-due-to-new-apps-shortfalls/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The old app "still needs to be retired," AcuRite tells us. ]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Smart weather-monitoring device vendor AcuRite has delayed plans to force users onto a new companion app. The transition from My AcuRite to AcuRite NOW, which AcuRite previously set for May 30, “has raised serious questions and concerns among many long-time users,” AcuRite’s VP of product development, Jeff Bovee, told Ars Technica.</p>
<p>AcuRite, whose devices include weather stations, rain gauges, and indoor thermometers, told customers that it would <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/05/weather-monitoring-firm-hangs-dark-cloud-over-customers-heads-by-forcing-new-app/">shut down My AcuRite</a> at the end of May. Devices owners would have to use AcuRite NOW, an iOS and Android app launched in June 2025, to control their gadgets instead.</p>
<p>Some long-time users lamented being forced to new software when the current software worked fine, if not better, than the new app. When Ars <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/05/weather-monitoring-firm-hangs-dark-cloud-over-customers-heads-by-forcing-new-app/">first reported</a> on AcuRite in May, AcuRite NOW lacked some features of My AcuRite, including the ability to rename multiple temperature sensors, report temperatures in non-integers, as well as an online dashboard option. Users have also highlighted problems uploading data to weather sites and a poor layout with wasted space.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/iot-gadget-firm-acurite-delays-forced-app-migration-due-to-new-apps-shortfalls/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/iot-gadget-firm-acurite-delays-forced-app-migration-due-to-new-apps-shortfalls/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AcuRite-Optimus-1152x648-1781203140.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AcuRite-Optimus-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>AcuRite</media:credit><media:text>AcuRite NOW was released alongside AcuRite's Optimus weather station (pictured). </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>After nearly breaking, NASA&#039;s Deep Space Network &quot;worked well&quot; on Artemis II</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/after-nearly-breaking-nasas-deep-space-network-worked-well-on-artemis-ii/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/after-nearly-breaking-nasas-deep-space-network-worked-well-on-artemis-ii/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Stephen Clark]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artemis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artemis II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Space Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planetary science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar system]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/after-nearly-breaking-nasas-deep-space-network-worked-well-on-artemis-ii/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["Some missions are using more than what their paperwork would say."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>NASA pushed its Deep Space Network beyond its limits during the Artemis I mission nearly four years ago. The global array of deep space communications antennas couldn't keep up with the routine demands of 40 robotic science missions and the extraordinary surge required by NASA's Orion space capsule as it flew around the Moon.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/08/nasas-artemis-i-mission-nearly-broke-the-deep-space-network/">experience in late 2022</a> reduced or delayed downlinks from several high-profile science missions, including the James Webb Space Telescope and Mars rovers, as the data-hungry Artemis I mission took priority on NASA's communications network. And that was before the first Artemis mission with astronauts onboard. When Artemis II launched April 1, NASA called upon the Deep Space Network (DSN) again to connect Mission Control to the Orion capsule as it soared more than a quarter of a million miles from Earth.</p>
<p>With a crew of four flying inside the spacecraft, the agency's appetite for data from Orion on Artemis II was even higher than it was on Artemis I. But at a little more than nine days, the Artemis II mission was shorter than the 25 days Artemis I spent in space, helping alleviate the communications overload. Artemis I also launched 10 small CubeSats into deep space, many of which required tracking and telecom services from the DSN. Artemis II carried fewer CubeSats.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/after-nearly-breaking-nasas-deep-space-network-worked-well-on-artemis-ii/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/after-nearly-breaking-nasas-deep-space-network-worked-well-on-artemis-ii/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/PIA17790large-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/PIA17790large-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>NASA/JPL-Caltech</media:credit><media:text>File photo of the 70-meter antenna at NASA's Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex in California.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>F1 teams spend millions on their simulators—what makes them different?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/whats-so-special-about-a-formula-1-driver-in-the-loop-simulator/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/whats-so-special-about-a-formula-1-driver-in-the-loop-simulator/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jonathan M. Gitlin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac F1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving simulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynisma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Formula 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racing]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/whats-so-special-about-a-formula-1-driver-in-the-loop-simulator/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Latency, bandwidth, and fidelity all matter when you're chasing milliseconds.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Among the ways Formula 1 has changed in the 21st century has been its adoption of <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/08/this-isnt-a-game-we-try-out-a-professional-driver-in-the-loop-simulator/">driver-in-the-loop simulators</a>. It all started in the early 2000s, probably at McLaren, maybe at Toyota or Ferrari; F1 teams are notoriously secretive about their performance advantages. Along the years, they've gotten more and more capable, but so too have high-end consumer sims like the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/04/strap-in-we-test-a-full-motion-off-road-racing-simulator-from-cxc/">multi-axis setups that cost tens of thousands of dollars</a>. What is it that makes the multimillion-dollar simulators used in F1 that much more expensive, and that much better for the job?</p>
<p>For one thing, latency.</p>
<p>"There's this intimate link between the inputs that [a driver] provides to the car, the way the car responds, and then the driver immediately feels that and reacts to it. So this is a very dynamic closed loop involving the driver and the car," explained Ash Warne, founder and CTO of Dynisma Motion Generators, a UK-based simulator company that supplies Ferrari, Alpine, and soon Cadillac with DiL simulators that can cost as much as $10 million.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/whats-so-special-about-a-formula-1-driver-in-the-loop-simulator/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/whats-so-special-about-a-formula-1-driver-in-the-loop-simulator/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/DMG-1_Motorsport-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/DMG-1_Motorsport-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Dynisma</media:credit><media:text>F1 teams can spend between $3 million and $10 million on driver-in-the-loop simulators. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Did Iron Age Britons remove brains of the dead?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/did-iron-age-britons-remove-brains-of-the-dead/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/did-iron-age-britons-remove-brains-of-the-dead/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jennifer Ouellette]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic archaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funerary rites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron age]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/did-iron-age-britons-remove-brains-of-the-dead/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Archaeologists found apparent scrape marks inside a skull; long bones may have been sharpened into tools.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Very little is known about funerary practices in Iron Age Britain, since few human remains have survived. However, the environment in northwest Scotland is more conducive to preserving bone from that period. Archaeologists have previously noted evidence of <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Cladh-Hallan-Roundhouses-stratigraghy-organisation/dp/1789256933">postmortem manipulation</a> of human remains, such as mummification, and of <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/1461957112Y.0000000004">modifying human bones</a> into tools or decorative artifacts. Now <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/reconnecting-the-dead-in-iron-age-britain-funerary-processing-and-longdistance-connectivity-at-loch-borralie-scotland/450BC6B98B6F1FECE3E42941F26C8619">a new paper</a> published in the journal Antiquity describes evidence of postmortem brain removal in remains from that region, as well as sharpened limb bones, possibly for use as tools.</p>
<p>The remains in question were found in 2000 at a burial cairn in Loch Borralie, near the most northwest tip of the Scottish mainland, after erosion revealed a human cranium. The excavated remains belonged to two individuals: one an adult female and the other a juvenile of (at the time) indeterminate sex; the cranium belonged to the latter. The authors of the new paper conducted a fresh osteoarchaeological analysis as well as multi-isotope and ancient DNA analysis. Radiocarbon dating of molar teeth from both sets of remains placed their deaths as occurring between 50 BCE and 70 CE.</p>
<p>In the case of the female individual, the authors noted an unusual break at the base of the cranium that likely occurred near the time of death. It's the kind of fracture that one gets from high-velocity impacts, including vehicular collisions, sporting accidents, falls, assaults, or even long-drop hanging. But the known forensic patterns observed in the aforementioned scenarios don't exactly match the pattern of the Iron Age cranium, leading the authors to conclude that it likely resulted from a targeted impact. They also noted perimortem fractures on both scapulae.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/did-iron-age-britons-remove-brains-of-the-dead/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/did-iron-age-britons-remove-brains-of-the-dead/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/brain1-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/brain1-500x500-1781095102.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Rebecca Ellis-Haken</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>&quot;This cannot continue&quot;: Xbox leaders lay out &quot;hard truths&quot; behind sagging brand</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/06/this-cannot-continue-xbox-leaders-lay-out-hard-truths-behind-sagging-brand/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/06/this-cannot-continue-xbox-leaders-lay-out-hard-truths-behind-sagging-brand/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Kyle Orland]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asha Sharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt booty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XBox]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/06/this-cannot-continue-xbox-leaders-lay-out-hard-truths-behind-sagging-brand/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Brutal self-assessment paints a picture of a Microsoft gaming division in crisis.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Just 100 days ago, when new Microsoft Gaming CEO Asha Sharma <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/02/microsoft-gaming-chief-phil-spencer-steps-down-after-38-years-with-company/">replaced long-serving executive Phil Spencer</a>, she said she'd work to "understand what makes [Xbox] work and protect it." Now, Sharma and Xbox Studios chief Matt Booty have laid out the many things that are <em>not</em> working for the Xbox brand in a brutal self-assessment the they say necessitates a wholesale "Xbox reset."</p>
<p>The message sent to Xbox employees and <a href="https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2026/06/10/next-100-days-xbox-reset/">shared publicly via Xbox Wire</a> last night paints a grim picture for practically every facet of the Xbox division. That portion of Microsoft is currently only seeing a "3 percent accountability margin" (read: profit margin), down year over year and well below both <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/video-game-industry-sheds-jobs-to-protect-margins">the game industry average</a> and the lofty 30 percent margins that <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-23/microsoft-pushes-xbox-studios-to-hit-higher-profit-margins?embedded-checkout=true">Microsoft is reportedly seeking</a> across the board.</p>
<p>It's an underperformance, they write, born out of being "overextended" by moves like <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2023/10/microsoft-finally-owns-candy-crush-as-it-closes-69b-activision-blizzard-deal/">the $69 billion acquisition of Activision</a>. That mega-merger came on top of $20 billion in spending on other acquisitions, platform investments, and hardware subsidies over the last five years, the executives write. But despite the spending spree, Microsoft's overall gaming revenues are <em>down</em> nearly $500 million compared to five years ago.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/06/this-cannot-continue-xbox-leaders-lay-out-hard-truths-behind-sagging-brand/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/06/this-cannot-continue-xbox-leaders-lay-out-hard-truths-behind-sagging-brand/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>204</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/xbox-dominoes-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/xbox-dominoes-500x500-1781185324.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Aurich Lawson</media:credit><media:text>The Xbox brand dominoes continue to fall.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Alaskans will be flying blind after NSF decommissions ocean monitoring network</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/alaskans-will-be-flying-blind-after-nsf-decommissions-ocean-monitoring-network/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/alaskans-will-be-flying-blind-after-nsf-decommissions-ocean-monitoring-network/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Paula Dobbyn, Inside Climate News]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/alaskans-will-be-flying-blind-after-nsf-decommissions-ocean-monitoring-network/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Alaska's multibillion-dollar fishing industry and vulnerable coastal communities at risk.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The upcoming loss of a deep-ocean monitoring system is triggering deep anxiety in Alaska, the nation’s top <a href="https://www.alaskaseafood.org/industry/economic-harvest-data/economic-impact/">fish-producing</a> state, where temperatures are warming <a href="https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/new-report-highlights-alaska%E2%80%99s-last-five-years-dramatic-climate">twice as quickly</a> as the global average.</p>
<p>The National Science Foundation <a href="https://oceanobservatories.org/2026/05/announcement-on-ooi-descoping/">announced</a> plans in May to decommission the <a href="https://oceanobservatories.org/">Ocean Observatories Initiative</a>, a nearly $368 million network of scientific instruments that tracks ocean chemistry, wave action, water temperature, salinity, and a host of other metrics.</p>
<p>The real-time information from these ocean observatories helps scientists, fishery managers, coastal hazard planners, and even the <a href="https://www.dvidshub.net/video/793230/operation-northern-edge-why-navy-trains-gulf-alaska">military</a> plan and prepare for the future. Whether that’s calculating how much fish can be harvested or when a marine heatwave or giant wave action may be occurring, the data is used by a plethora of sources.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/alaskans-will-be-flying-blind-after-nsf-decommissions-ocean-monitoring-network/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/alaskans-will-be-flying-blind-after-nsf-decommissions-ocean-monitoring-network/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/oceanbuoy-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/oceanbuoy-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Laura Dwyer/NOAA</media:credit><media:text>A NOAA crew retrieves an Ocean Station Papa buoy in the Gulf of Alaska.
</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>The first complex cells had genes from a complex mix of species</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/the-first-complex-cells-had-genes-from-a-complex-mix-of-species/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/the-first-complex-cells-had-genes-from-a-complex-mix-of-species/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[John Timmer]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eukaryotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genomics]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/the-first-complex-cells-had-genes-from-a-complex-mix-of-species/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Our ancestors' genomes were built through successive waves of gene transfers.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>We tend to view ourselves and the complex cells that build us as a distinct branch of the tree of life from the compact, seemingly featureless cells of bacteria and archaea. But we've found that our genome is actually a hybrid, a mish-mash of genes from bacteria and archaea, along with some that have evolved in our own lineage.</p>
<p>Scientists gradually settled on a simple explanation for this: the first complex cells were the product of a fusion between archaeal cells and bacteria, with the bacteria ultimately evolving into the mitochondria, a chemical-power-generating structure that still retains a bit of its own genome. Over time, many of the other bacterial genes were transferred to the nucleus of what was becoming what we now call a eukaryote, intermingling with the archaeal genes there.</p>
<p>But a new study has taken a careful look at some of the genes shared by all eukaryotes and comes to the conclusion that the reality is a little more complicated and that there were several waves of gene transfers from bacteria. The big picture of a merger between bacteria and archaea is still right, but it was only part of a picture where gene transfers among species were commonplace.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/the-first-complex-cells-had-genes-from-a-complex-mix-of-species/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/the-first-complex-cells-had-genes-from-a-complex-mix-of-species/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-2240394766-2-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-2240394766-2-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>MARK GARLICK/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Several things I like about macOS 27 Golden Gate that have nothing to do with AI</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/five-things-i-like-and-one-thing-i-still-want-in-the-macos-27-golden-gate-beta/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/five-things-i-like-and-one-thing-i-still-want-in-the-macos-27-golden-gate-beta/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Andrew Cunningham]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 11:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macos 27]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macos 27 golden gate]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/five-things-i-like-and-one-thing-i-still-want-in-the-macos-27-golden-gate-beta/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[AI aside, Golden Gate includes a bunch of subtle-but-helpful improvements.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Apple Intelligence and Siri AI have sucked most of the oxygen out of the room at Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference this year—understandable, maybe, given that the AI-powered Siri delays are all anyone has wanted to ask any Apple executive about for the last two years.</p>
<p>But Apple Intelligence is just one of the three big focus areas Apple outlined during its keynote this week. The second is new parental controls—overdue, but promising-looking, as the parent of a 6-year-old with an iPad that I only begrudgingly connect to the Internet. And the third is "platform improvements," a catch-all for a wide range of fit-and-finish changes aimed at boosting responsiveness and addressing common user complaints.</p>
<p>I have the first beta of macOS 27 Golden Gate running on an M1 MacBook Air—the oldest, slowest hardware Apple supports now that Intel compatibility is out the window. With some help from <a href="https://blog.oneberri.com/posts/wwdc26-the-small-things">Apple's densely packed wall-of-features slide</a>, here are a few things from the "platform improvements" column I like the most, plus one item I'd still like to see.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/five-things-i-like-and-one-thing-i-still-want-in-the-macos-27-golden-gate-beta/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/five-things-i-like-and-one-thing-i-still-want-in-the-macos-27-golden-gate-beta/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/golden-gate-window-corner-1152x648-1781124749.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/golden-gate-window-corner-500x500-1781124733.jpeg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Andrew Cunningham</media:credit><media:text>Screenshot</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Diabetes org apologizes for ejecting scientists over criticism of Trump</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/diabetes-org-apologizes-for-ejecting-scientists-over-criticism-of-trump/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/diabetes-org-apologizes-for-ejecting-scientists-over-criticism-of-trump/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Beth Mole]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 22:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/diabetes-org-apologizes-for-ejecting-scientists-over-criticism-of-trump/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[For days after the stunning incident, the ADA had doubled-down on the choice.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Amid intense backlash, the head of the American Diabetes Association posted <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7K2j3Rs-Qg">a video</a> Wednesday apologizing for the organization's decision on Friday to forcefully remove <a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/scientists-ejected-from-diabetes-conference-for-distributing-journal-reprints/">five leading diabetes scientists</a> from the association's annual meeting.</p>
<p>The scientists were ejected for handing out copies of an April editorial—published in the ADA's own journal Diabetes Care—that sharply criticizes the Trump administration for the damage and destruction it's wreaking on biomedical research. The five scientists included Steven Kahn, professor of medicine at the University of Washington, who is the editor-in-chief of Diabetes Care and a co-author of the editorial. It also included former ADA President Desmond Schatz of the University of Florida.</p>
<p>The scientists were distributing the editorial outside the conference's opening speech, which was originally scheduled to be given by Jay Bhattacharya, head of the National Institutes of Health under Trump. Bhattacharya canceled at the last minute, and senior NIH official Rick Woychik took his place.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/diabetes-org-apologizes-for-ejecting-scientists-over-criticism-of-trump/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/diabetes-org-apologizes-for-ejecting-scientists-over-criticism-of-trump/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>149</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/diabetes1-1152x648-1780778332.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/diabetes1-500x500-1780778318.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Screenshot/MedPage Today</media:credit><media:text>Police escort Dr. Steven Kahn out of a medical conference in New Orleans for handing out copies of an editorial critical of the Trump administration.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Man sues Florida cops over arrest spurred by &quot;93% match&quot; in facial recognition</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/man-jailed-due-to-faulty-face-recognition-says-florida-cops-ignored-other-evidence/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/man-jailed-due-to-faulty-face-recognition-says-florida-cops-ignored-other-evidence/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 21:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial recognition]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/man-jailed-due-to-faulty-face-recognition-says-florida-cops-ignored-other-evidence/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Lawsuit: "Police let an error-prone AI system stand in for an investigation."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>A man suing Florida police alleges that cops relied on a faulty facial recognition match and concealed exculpatory evidence when they arrested him on a charge of attempting to lure a child in August 2024. The plaintiff, Robert Dillon, was arrested after a facial recognition system flagged him as a 93 percent match to a suspect filmed by a McDonald's surveillance camera.</p>
<p>"This case is about what happens when police let an error-prone artificial intelligence system stand in for an investigation," said the lawsuit filed today. "A facial recognition algorithm flagged Robert Dillon as the man who tried to lure or entice a child under twelve years old at a Jacksonville Beach McDonald’s. It was wrong. Mr. Dillon, a fifty-two-year-old resident of Fort Myers, had never set foot in Jacksonville Beach. But rather than test the machine’s answer against the evidence that would have cleared him, the officers built a case to confirm it. Mr. Dillon was arrested and prosecuted for one of the most stigmatizing crimes a person can face."</p>
<p>Dillon lives more than 300 miles from Jacksonville Beach, and a police search of a license plate reader database found no evidence he was in the area when the alleged crime was committed, the lawsuit said. Dillon was flagged as the suspect based on a low-quality image, specifically a photo taken of a McDonald's computer screen that was displaying video surveillance footage, the lawsuit said.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/man-jailed-due-to-faulty-face-recognition-says-florida-cops-ignored-other-evidence/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/man-jailed-due-to-faulty-face-recognition-says-florida-cops-ignored-other-evidence/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>143</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/getty-facial-scan-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/getty-facial-scan-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | imaginima</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Logitech’s foldable mouse is for people who refuse to carry a mouse with them</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/logitechs-mobi-fold-folds-for-travel-but-i-prefer-a-different-portable-mouse/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/logitechs-mobi-fold-folds-for-travel-but-i-prefer-a-different-portable-mouse/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Scharon Harding]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logitech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mouse]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/logitechs-mobi-fold-folds-for-travel-but-i-prefer-a-different-portable-mouse/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The Mobi Fold is an $80 Bluetooth mouse with a silicone-wrapped hinge. ]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>I see it often. Hardworking professionals in cafés, airports, or parks hunched over a laptop while carefully dragging their fingers over their PC’s trackpad to navigate some email, project, or alert that can’t be ignored. They would prefer a mouse to a trackpad, but are reluctant to travel with one.</p>
<p>When you’re on the go, carrying a mouse can seem burdensome or unnecessary. But I’d argue that it’s worth the boost in efficiency and comfort when navigating your computer, tablet, <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/12/best-iphone-travel-accessories/">or phone</a>. For the people who refuse to carry a bulky mouse with them, even when they plan to use their computer away from their desk, I’m glad Logitech launched the Mobi Fold, a foldable, wireless mouse. But I’d still push reluctant mobile mouse users toward something even more comfortable.</p>
<h2>Logitech’s Mobi Fold</h2>
<img width="640" height="423" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Logitech-Mobi-Fold-folded-640x423.jpg" class="right medium" alt="Logitech Mobi Fold going into someone's back pocket" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Logitech-Mobi-Fold-folded-640x423.jpg 640w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Logitech-Mobi-Fold-folded-1024x676.jpg 1024w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Logitech-Mobi-Fold-folded-768x507.jpg 768w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Logitech-Mobi-Fold-folded-1536x1015.jpg 1536w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Logitech-Mobi-Fold-folded-980x647.jpg 980w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Logitech-Mobi-Fold-folded-1440x951.jpg 1440w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Logitech-Mobi-Fold-folded.jpg 1794w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px">
      The mouse's PAW3222 sensor supports 400-4,000 DPI in 100-DPI increments.
        Credit:
          Logitech
      
<p>The <a href="https://www.logitech.com/en-us/shop/p/mobi-fold-mouse">Logitech Mobi Fold</a> released today for $80 folds in half so that it’s easy to carry around. Logitech’s announcement claimed that it found that “while 72 percent of professionals own a mouse, only 26 percent actually use one when working in public places.” The announcement didn’t explain Logitech’s methodology, but it seems that someone at the Swiss company has also grimaced at the awkwardly bent wrist of people using laptop trackpads in public.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/logitechs-mobi-fold-folds-for-travel-but-i-prefer-a-different-portable-mouse/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/logitechs-mobi-fold-folds-for-travel-but-i-prefer-a-different-portable-mouse/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>115</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Logitech-Mobi-Fold-cover-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Logitech-Mobi-Fold-cover-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Logitech</media:credit><media:text>The Mobi Fold is 1.3 (height) x 2.24 (width) x 4.8 (depth) inches when open.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Google DeepMind releases DiffusionGemma, a model that runs local AI 4x faster</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/06/googles-latest-diffusiongemma-open-ai-model-comes-with-a-4x-speed-boost/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/06/googles-latest-diffusiongemma-open-ai-model-comes-with-a-4x-speed-boost/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ryan Whitwam]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generative ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/06/googles-latest-diffusiongemma-open-ai-model-comes-with-a-4x-speed-boost/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Diffusion AI is most common in image generation, but it can make text outputs much faster. ]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Another day, another AI model from Google. This time, Google DeepMind has released a new member of the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/google-announces-gemma-4-open-ai-models-switches-to-apache-2-0-license/">Gemma 4 open model family</a>, but it's fundamentally different from the rest of the lineup. DiffusionGemma doesn't generate outputs linearly like most AI models. Instead, it can produce an entire block of text in parallel. <a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/developers-tools/diffusion-gemma-faster-text-generation/">Google says</a> this makes it faster and more efficient when running on local hardware like an Nvidia DGX or a humble gaming GPU.</p>
<p>Most AI models are designed to be autoregressive—they generate text left to right one token at a time. DiffusionGemma has more in common with image generation models, which start with static and then denoise it to create the desired content. This model takes a field of placeholder tokens running over the canvas multiple times to generate likely tokens and using those to improve estimation of others. At the end of the process, the model finalizes its token outputs in one large block—the "denoised" text canvas.</p>
<figure class="video ars-wp-video ars-wp-video--horizontal">
  <div class="" style="">
    <div class="wrapper ars-wp-video-wrapper relative" style="aspect-ratio: 1.7732656514382;">
      <video class="wp-video-shortcode absolute w-full h-full object-contain left-0 top-0" id="video-2158841-1" width="2096" height="1182" preload="metadata" controls="controls"><source type="video/mp4" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Diffusion_Process_3_1.mp4?_=1"></source></video>
    </div>

    <figcaption>
      <span class="icon caption-arrow icon-drop-indicator"></span>
          </figcaption>
  </div>
</figure>

<p>DiffusionGemma is fairly large in the realm of Google's open models. It's a Mixture of Experts (MoE) model with a total of 26 billion parameters, but only 3.8 billion are activated during inference. That means it should fit in the 18GB RAM allotment of a high-end GPU. In testing with an RTX 5090, DiffusionGemma spits out around 700 tokens per second. With a single Nvidia H100 AI accelerator, DiffusionGemma can produce 1,000+ tokens per second. That's about four times the output of the similarly sized autoregressive Gemma models.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/06/googles-latest-diffusiongemma-open-ai-model-comes-with-a-4x-speed-boost/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/06/googles-latest-diffusiongemma-open-ai-model-comes-with-a-4x-speed-boost/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/HeroVisual.width-2200.format-webp-1152x648.png" type="image/png" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/HeroVisual.width-2200.format-webp-500x500.png" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Google</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>We managed to glean some interesting details about the Artemis III mission</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/we-managed-to-glean-some-interesting-details-about-the-artemis-iii-mission/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/we-managed-to-glean-some-interesting-details-about-the-artemis-iii-mission/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Eric Berger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/we-managed-to-glean-some-interesting-details-about-the-artemis-iii-mission/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["I was on the phone with Blue Origin leadership that night, all the next day, all through the weekend."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, NASA <a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/nasa-assigns-crew-for-artemis-iii-sets-aggressive-timeline-for-flying-it/">announced the crew for the Artemis III mission</a>, which is scheduled to be flown no earlier than summer 2027. As part of the announcement, space agency officials also discussed plans for the crew to dock with both a Blue Origin lander and a SpaceX Starship lander during the spaceflight in low-Earth orbit.</p>
<p>The presentation, although informative, still left open key questions about the landers' readiness and what exactly they'll look like. After the crew announcement, Ars sat down with Jeremy Parsons, NASA's Artemis program manager, to answer some of these questions.</p>
<p>This interview, conducted at NASA's Johnson Space Center, has been lightly edited for clarity.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/we-managed-to-glean-some-interesting-details-about-the-artemis-iii-mission/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/we-managed-to-glean-some-interesting-details-about-the-artemis-iii-mission/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/NHQ202604010037medium-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/NHQ202604010037medium-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>NASA/Aubrey Gemignani</media:credit><media:text>NASA's Jeremy Parsons monitors the countdown of the Artemis II launch vehicle in April 2026.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Nobody needs AI to search the Internet, court says in ruling against Google</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/nobody-needs-ai-to-search-the-internet-court-says-in-ruling-against-google/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/nobody-needs-ai-to-search-the-internet-court-says-in-ruling-against-google/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ashley Belanger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai overviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misinformation]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/nobody-needs-ai-to-search-the-internet-court-says-in-ruling-against-google/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Google AI Overview court loss in Germany could spell doom for AI search industry.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Potentially impacting all AI search engines and chatbots known to poorly paraphrase source links, a German court has <a href="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Google-AI-Overview-Munich-Court-Ruling.pdf">ruled</a> that Google is liable for false statements in AI Overviews.</p>
<p>The preliminary ruling came in a case <a href="https://the-decoder.com/landmark-german-ruling-declares-googles-ai-overviews-are-googles-own-words-and-makes-it-liable-for-false-answers/">flagged by The Decoder</a>, where two publishers found that Google's AI Overviews incorrectly linked them to scams and other sketchy business practices. After smearing publishers by making affirmative statements like "Yes, [it] is known for dubious business practices and is often perceived as a scam," Google failed to correct the misleading output, even after the publishers sent a cease-and-desist letter earlier this year.</p>
<p>Google tried the usual arguments to shield itself from liability for false statements in AI Overviews, such as arguing that most users understand that AI outputs aren't always accurate and must be verified.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/nobody-needs-ai-to-search-the-internet-court-says-in-ruling-against-google/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/nobody-needs-ai-to-search-the-internet-court-says-in-ruling-against-google/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>241</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-2277898840-1024x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1024" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/GettyImages-2277898840-500x500-1781109528.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>SOPA Images / Contributor | LightRocket</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Cheap Iranian drone downed $25 million US Army helicopter—maybe by chance</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/cheap-iranian-drone-downed-25-million-us-army-helicopter-maybe-by-chance/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/cheap-iranian-drone-downed-25-million-us-army-helicopter-maybe-by-chance/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jeremy Hsu]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache helicopter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close encounters of the unwanted kind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump iran war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA-Iran War]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/cheap-iranian-drone-downed-25-million-us-army-helicopter-maybe-by-chance/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The US military struck Iran again after an Iranian drone’s lucky midair strike.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>A US Army helicopter gunship was apparently struck by an Iranian Shahed drone before going down near the Strait of Hormuz—but it's unclear whether the one-way attack drone was deliberately aimed or achieved more of a lucky accidental strike.</p>
<p>Axios correspondent <a href="https://x.com/BarakRavid/status/2064392995118411871">Barak Ravid</a> first reported an unnamed US government official’s comments that an Iranian drone had hit the US Army AH-64 Apache helicopter before the latter went down on June 8. The <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/09/us/politics/trump-helicopter-iran-war.html">New York Times</a> later confirmed that reporting through more anonymous US officials, including one official who said US military investigators were still evaluating whether the Iranian drone strike on the helicopter was intentional or accidental.</p>
<p>Iran has fired thousands of such Shahed drones against a wide range of military and civilian targets in the Gulf region since February 28, 2026, when the United States and Israel began the war by jointly attacking Iran with a barrage of bombs and missiles. But Shahed drones have mainly struck stationary targets such as <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/05/amazon-stuck-with-months-of-repairs-after-drone-strikes-on-data-centers/">Amazon data centers</a> and energy facilities, sometimes hitting slow-moving <a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/">commercial ships</a> in the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/iran-demands-big-tech-pay-fees-for-undersea-internet-cables-in-strait-of-hormuz/">Strait of Hormuz</a>.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/cheap-iranian-drone-downed-25-million-us-army-helicopter-maybe-by-chance/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/cheap-iranian-drone-downed-25-million-us-army-helicopter-maybe-by-chance/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>183</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Apache-helicopters-Strait-of-Hormuz.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Apache-helicopters-Strait-of-Hormuz-500x500.jpeg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>US Central Command</media:credit><media:text>AH-64 Apache helicopters fly above the Strait of Hormuz during a patrol, April 17. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>OB-GYNs release their own vaccine schedule, rejecting RFK Jr.&#039;s meddling</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/bucking-rfk-jr-ob-gyns-release-vaccine-guidance-that-conflicts-with-cdc/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/bucking-rfk-jr-ob-gyns-release-vaccine-guidance-that-conflicts-with-cdc/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Beth Mole]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OB-GYN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert f kennedy jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/bucking-rfk-jr-ob-gyns-release-vaccine-guidance-that-conflicts-with-cdc/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Thirteen other medical groups have already endorsed the independent schedule.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>For the first time, the American College of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists (ACOG) has released its <a href="https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/maternal-immunization-schedule">own recommendations for maternal vaccination</a>, providing formal guidance that diverges from that of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention amid unprecedented policy changes and meddling from anti-vaccine Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.</p>
<p>ACOG President Camille Clare blamed "changing national recommendations coupled with rampant vaccine misinformation" for the confusion among patients and health care professionals about vaccines during pregnancy.</p>
<p>"It is incredibly important for the public to have access to reliable, evidence-based information on maternal immunizations from a trusted source. ACOG is proud to be that source," <a href="https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2026/06/acog-releases-2026-maternal-immunization-schedule">Clare said in a statement</a>.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/bucking-rfk-jr-ob-gyns-release-vaccine-guidance-that-conflicts-with-cdc/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/bucking-rfk-jr-ob-gyns-release-vaccine-guidance-that-conflicts-with-cdc/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/GettyImages-1835179103-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/GettyImages-1835179103-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty | NataliaDeriabina</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Valve kills its retail gift card program due to scammers</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/06/valve-kills-its-retail-gift-card-program-due-to-scammers/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/06/valve-kills-its-retail-gift-card-program-due-to-scammers/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Kyle Orland]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gift Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valve]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/06/valve-kills-its-retail-gift-card-program-due-to-scammers/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Move also cuts off a massive market of legit users who buy cards with physical cash.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>For years, Valve's physical Steam gift cards have been the closest you could come to buying a Steam game at a brick-and-mortar store. Now, Valve says it is phasing out the production of new retail gift cards, citing a losing battle against scammers exploiting the hard-to-track payment method.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.pcguide.com/news/valve-discontinues-physical-steam-gift-cards-blames-gift-card-scams-as-scammers-adapt-to-protections/">PC Guide</a> was among the first to note the end of Valve's retail gift card program, which was quietly announced in <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20260521040543/https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/78E3-7431-1E88-AD59">a recent update</a> to <a href="https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/78E3-7431-1E88-AD59#retailers">a Steam support page</a>. Since launching the retail cards in 2012, Valve says it has been fighting a constant battle with scammers, who <a href="https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/avoiding-and-reporting-gift-card-scams">instruct victims to purchase gift cards</a> and share the pertinent details and security PIN. Those scammers can then <a href="https://www.polygon.com/2015/2/9/8006693/the-truth-behind-those-mysteriously-cheap-gray-market-game-codes/">resell the gift card details at a discount on gray-market sites</a> to effectively launder the funds, creating an <a href="https://www.paypal.com/us/money-hub/article/gift-card-scams">anonymous and hard-to-trace form of payment</a>.</p>
<p>Valve says it has made various moves to slow scammers, including <span style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">placing limits on redemption and availability and adding a <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Scams/comments/17r42t9/sad_steam_has_to_put_this_on_their_gift_cards_but/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">prominent warning on the cards themselves:</a> "Never</span> share a pin via email, social media or over the phone."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/06/valve-kills-its-retail-gift-card-program-due-to-scammers/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/06/valve-kills-its-retail-gift-card-program-due-to-scammers/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/steamcard-1152x648-1781107823.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/steamcard-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Prestmit</media:credit><media:text>This photo is going to be a vision from a lost world relatively soon.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>The 2026 Honda Prelude review: Didn&#039;t expect such a head-turner</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/2026-honda-prelude-review-we-need-more-affordable-coupes-like-this/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/2026-honda-prelude-review-we-need-more-affordable-coupes-like-this/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jonathan M. Gitlin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda Prelude]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/2026-honda-prelude-review-we-need-more-affordable-coupes-like-this/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Honda's $42,000 hybrid coupe looks great, handles well, and gets 44 mpg.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>You can tell Honda was trying to manage expectations when it emailed me to stress that "the Prelude is not a sports car." And I can understand why. On paper, the specs make the sleek coupe—technically a three-door hatch—seem underwhelming. Especially if you start comparing it to alternatives.</p>
<p>A Mazda MX-5 or Subaru BRZ weighs hundreds of pounds less, and the Subaru packs more power than the Prelude's 200 hp (149 kW). A Volkswagen Golf GTI weighs about the same as the Prelude at 3,261 lbs (1,479 kg), but it delivers 20 percent more power and offers rear seats that actually accommodate adults. But after a week with the bright blue Prelude, it's hard to care about the specs. This might be one of the best cars we'll drive all year.</p>
<p>Then again, <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/03/an-engineering-thesis-disguised-as-a-coupe-a-history-of-the-honda-prelude/">looking back across the previous five generations</a>, the Prelude was never really a sports car. It has always been a technology showcase for Honda, introducing features like fuel injection, four-wheel steering, variable valve timing, and active torque transfer. For the sixth-generation Prelude, the headline feature is Honda's S+ shift, which adds some sporty character to the OEM's four-cylinder hybrid.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/2026-honda-prelude-review-we-need-more-affordable-coupes-like-this/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/2026-honda-prelude-review-we-need-more-affordable-coupes-like-this/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>185</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/2026-Honda-Prelude-5-1152x648-1781104671.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/2026-Honda-Prelude-5-500x500-1781104659.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Jonathan Gitlin</media:credit><media:text>Honda's new Prelude drew skepticism at launch because it's a hybrid. Well, I'm here to tell you it's a very good car.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Racist comments targeting politicians tripled since Meta relaxed its rules</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/racist-comments-targeting-politicians-tripled-since-meta-relaxed-its-rules/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/racist-comments-targeting-politicians-tripled-since-meta-relaxed-its-rules/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[David Gilbert, wired.com]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDDH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moderation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/racist-comments-targeting-politicians-tripled-since-meta-relaxed-its-rules/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Violent threats against lawmakers have also surged on Facebook.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Last year, Meta radically <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/meta-ditches-fact-checkers-in-favor-of-x-style-community-notes/">overhauled the rules</a> around what content it would allow on its platforms. The company <a href="https://about.fb.com/news/2025/01/meta-more-speech-fewer-mistakes/">claimed</a> that its own efforts policing speech had gone too far and that it would relax the rules around what speech was allowed. “We have been over-enforcing our rules, limiting legitimate political debate and censoring too much trivial content and subjecting too many people to frustrating enforcement actions,” Joel Kaplan, Meta’s chief global affairs officer, wrote in a <a href="https://about.fb.com/news/2025/01/meta-more-speech-fewer-mistakes/">blog post</a> at the time.</p>
<p>Over a year later, <a href="https://counterhate.com/research/safety-off/">new research</a> from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) shows the immediate impact of these changes.</p>
<p>The researchers analyzed about 8 million Facebook comments and found that abusive and racist comments targeting both Republican and Democrat lawmakers tripled in the six months after the new rules were put in place. Some categories of abusive comments documented by the researchers saw even sharper rises, with violent threats and hate speech quadrupling during the same period.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/racist-comments-targeting-politicians-tripled-since-meta-relaxed-its-rules/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/racist-comments-targeting-politicians-tripled-since-meta-relaxed-its-rules/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/getty-meta-apps-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/getty-meta-apps-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | Chesnot </media:credit><media:text>Meta has a verified program for users of Facebook and Instagram.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>