<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >
    <channel>
        <title>Ars Technica</title>
        <atom:link href="https://arstechnica.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://arstechnica.com</link>
        <description>Serving the Technologist since 1998. News, reviews, and analysis.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 21:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>
            hourly        </sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>
            1        </sy:updateFrequency>
        
 
            <item>
                <title>What the heck is wrong with our AI overlords?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/what-the-heck-is-wrong-with-our-ai-overlords/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/what-the-heck-is-wrong-with-our-ai-overlords/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Nate Anderson]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 20:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sam altman]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/what-the-heck-is-wrong-with-our-ai-overlords/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[New profile of Sam Altman shines a light on a whole industry.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>I don't—thankfully—have to follow every statement that Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, makes about the world. Many of these statements seem more like "hustles" or "pitches" than attempts to speak thoughtfully about the future. Even if they are genuine statements of belief, they often read like a teenager's first sci-fi novel, written under the influence of weed and way too much <em>Star Trek</em>.</p>
<p>Consider, for instance, Altman's blog post "<a href="https://blog.samaltman.com/the-gentle-singularity">A Gentle Singularity</a>," published last year and read by nearly 600,000 people. Its central thesis seems to be that AI is all upside; everything has been great so far, and everything will be even greater in the future! I mean, just wait until we build robots that we can shove these AIs into—then tell those robots to go make more robots.</p>
<blockquote><p>If we have to make the first million humanoid robots the old-fashioned way, but then they can operate the entire supply chain—digging and refining minerals, driving trucks, running factories, etc.—to build more robots, which can build more chip fabrication facilities, data centers, etc, then the rate of progress will obviously be quite different.</p></blockquote>
<p>Everything is getting better; indeed, it's getting better <em>faster</em> thanks to "self-reinforcing loops" like this. Downsides? Trick question! There aren't any <em>real</em> downsides because people get used to things. Quickly. Just listen to how great it's gonna be:</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/what-the-heck-is-wrong-with-our-ai-overlords/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/what-the-heck-is-wrong-with-our-ai-overlords/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2162021307-1152x648-1775587328.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2162021307-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Bluesky users are mastering the fine art of blaming everything on &quot;vibe coding&quot;</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/bluesky-users-are-mastering-the-fine-art-of-blaming-everything-on-vibe-coding/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/bluesky-users-are-mastering-the-fine-art-of-blaming-everything-on-vibe-coding/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Kyle Orland]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 19:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluesky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vibe coding]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/bluesky-users-are-mastering-the-fine-art-of-blaming-everything-on-vibe-coding/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Use of AI coding tools has become a convenient boogeyman for any tech issues.
]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Social network Bluesky saw some intermittent service disruptions on Monday. On its own, this fact isn't that noteworthy—Bluesky has <a href="https://gvwire.com/2026/02/09/bluesky-goes-down-for-thousands-downdetector-reports/">seen similar service disruptions in the past</a>, and this one coincided with <a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/google-spotify-more-online-services-recovering-after-apparent-widespread-issue/ar-AA1GBAfM">widespread service problems</a> being reported with other popular sites (Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/status.bsky.app/post/3mits76o4pk2b">officially</a> blamed the temporary problems on an "upstream service provider").</p>
<p>What made this outage notable for many Bluesky users, though, was the instant assumption that it was the result of sloppy, AI-assisted "vibe coding" by the Bluesky development team.</p>
<p>Amid Monday's service issues, many Bluesky feeds were <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/alraven.bsky.social/post/3mitjgqaqys2r">filled</a> with <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/melfluff.bsky.social/post/3mitxkwgsn22s">hundreds</a> of <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/tommothecabbit.bsky.social/post/3mitlm6ribs2i">posts</a> that <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/cargie.baby/post/3mith72brks2k">laid the blame</a> on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/korybing.bsky.social/post/3mitzxa4b5c27">developers</a> who were <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/metalheadronin.bsky.social/post/3mitnvgvd6s2r">allegedly relying on unreliable AI tools</a> to ship faulty code. Some <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/trannieoakley.meangirls.online/post/3mitpzykpls2f">used memes</a>, others <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/idolizedpat.bsky.social/post/3mitxp44v322f">used alt text</a>, still others used <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/tranniehathaway.bsky.social/post/3mitkbbokf226">irony</a> or <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/lexluddy.xyz/post/3mithvyvphs26">wry humor</a> to call out Bluesky's development team for this alleged sloppiness.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/bluesky-users-are-mastering-the-fine-art-of-blaming-everything-on-vibe-coding/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/bluesky-users-are-mastering-the-fine-art-of-blaming-everything-on-vibe-coding/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/bluesky-vibe-coder-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/bluesky-vibe-coder-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Aurich Lawson | Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Live look at the Bluesky development offices.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>SCOTUS overturns 5th Circuit ruling that told ISP to kick pirates off Internet</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/scotus-overturns-5th-circuit-ruling-that-told-isp-to-kick-pirates-off-internet/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/scotus-overturns-5th-circuit-ruling-that-told-isp-to-kick-pirates-off-internet/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 18:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grande communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/scotus-overturns-5th-circuit-ruling-that-told-isp-to-kick-pirates-off-internet/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Supreme Court's precedent-setting Cox ruling helps Grande beat music piracy claims.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court yesterday overturned a 5th Circuit ruling that could have forced Internet service provider Grande Communications to terminate broadband subscribers accused of piracy.</p>
<p>Yesterday's ruling follows a precedent-setting decision last month in which the Supreme Court <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/03/supreme-court-rejects-sonys-attempt-to-kick-music-pirates-off-the-internet/">threw out a 4th Circuit ruling</a> against Cox Communications, another ISP accused by record labels of not doing enough to fight piracy. In the case involving Cox and Sony, the court said that "a company is not liable as a copyright infringer for merely providing a service to the general public with knowledge that it will be used by some to infringe copyrights."</p>
<p><em>Cox</em> is one of several cases in which record labels sought financial damages from ISPs that continued to serve customers whose IP addresses were repeatedly traced to torrent downloads or uploads. In October 2024, record labels Universal, Warner, and Sony <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/10/record-labels-win-again-court-says-isp-must-terminate-users-accused-of-piracy/">got a win over Grande</a> when the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit decided the ISP was liable for contributory copyright infringement.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/scotus-overturns-5th-circuit-ruling-that-told-isp-to-kick-pirates-off-internet/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/scotus-overturns-5th-circuit-ruling-that-told-isp-to-kick-pirates-off-internet/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/getty-pirate-flag-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/getty-pirate-flag-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | Priscila Zambotto</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Testing suggests Google&#039;s AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ryan Whitwam]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 16:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai overviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generative ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Is 90 percent accuracy good enough for a search robot? ]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Looking up information on Google today means confronting AI Overviews, the Gemini-powered search robot that appears at the top of the results page. AI Overviews has had a rough time since its 2024 launch, attracting user ire over its <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/05/googles-ai-overview-can-give-false-misleading-and-dangerous-answers/">scattershot accuracy</a>, but it's getting better and usually provides the right answer. That's a low bar, though. A <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/07/technology/google-ai-overviews-accuracy.html">new analysis</a> from The New York Times attempted to assess the accuracy of AI Overviews, finding it's right 90 percent of the time. The flip side is that 1 in 10 AI answers is wrong, and for Google, that means hundreds of thousands of lies going out every minute of the day.</p>
<p>The Times conducted this analysis with the help of a startup called Oumi, which itself is deeply involved in developing AI models. The company used AI tools to probe AI Overviews with the SimpleQA evaluation, a common test to rank the factuality of generative models like Gemini. Released by OpenAI in 2024, SimpleQA is essentially a list of more than 4,000 questions with verifiable answers that can be fed into an AI.</p>
<p>Oumi began running its test last year when Gemini 2.5 was still the company's best model. At the time, the benchmark showed an 85 percent accuracy rate. When the test was rerun following the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/01/ai-overviews-gets-upgraded-to-gemini-3-with-a-dash-of-ai-mode/">Gemini 3 update</a>, AI Overviews answered 91 percent of the questions correctly. If you extrapolate this miss rate out to all Google searches, AI Overviews is generating tens of millions of incorrect answers per day.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Gemini-chat-1152x648.png" type="image/png" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Gemini-chat-500x500.png" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Google</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Linux kernel maintainers are following through on removing Intel 486 support</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/linux-kernel-maintainers-are-following-through-on-removing-intel-486-support/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/linux-kernel-maintainers-are-following-through-on-removing-intel-486-support/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Andrew Cunningham]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 16:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[486]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[80486]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i486]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel 486]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/linux-kernel-maintainers-are-following-through-on-removing-intel-486-support/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Linux devs think even one second spent on 486 support is a second too many.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>One point in favor of the sprawling Linux ecosystem is its broad hardware support—the kernel officially supports everything from '90s-era PC hardware to Arm-based Apple Silicon chips, thanks to decades of combined effort from hardware manufacturers and motivated community members.</p>
<p>But nothing can last forever, and for a few years now, Linux maintainers (including Linus Torvalds) <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/05/linux-to-end-support-for-1989s-hottest-chip-the-486-with-next-release/">have been pushing</a> to drop kernel support for Intel's 80486 processor. This chip was originally introduced in 1989, was replaced by the first Intel Pentium in 1993, and was fully discontinued in 2007. Code commits <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.1-Phasing-Out-i486">suggest</a> that Linux kernel version 7.1 will be the first to follow through, making it impossible to build a version of the kernel that will support the 486; Phoronix <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.1-Phasing-Out-i486">says</a> that additional kernel changes to remove 486-related code will follow in subsequent kernel versions.</p>
<p>Although these chips haven't changed in decades, maintaining support for them in modern software isn't free.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/linux-kernel-maintainers-are-following-through-on-removing-intel-486-support/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/linux-kernel-maintainers-are-following-through-on-removing-intel-486-support/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GettyImages-90739236-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GettyImages-90739236-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>SSPL/Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>The Intel i486 processor, in all its math-co-processing, 600-plus-nanometer glory.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Finally, Artemis delivers some exceptional, high-quality photos of the Moon</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/the-artemis-ii-mission-sends-back-stunning-images-of-the-far-side-of-the-moon/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/the-artemis-ii-mission-sends-back-stunning-images-of-the-far-side-of-the-moon/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Eric Berger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 15:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artemis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthrise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/the-artemis-ii-mission-sends-back-stunning-images-of-the-far-side-of-the-moon/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The Moon, the Earth, and the Sun—oh what fun!]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>NASA's Artemis II mission, carrying four astronauts on an out-of-this-world journey, flew around the Moon on Monday.</p>
<p>The crew members took turns <a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/astronauts-set-distance-record-revealing-the-moon-as-a-place-to-be-explored/">describing the stunning landscape below</a> and captured images of Earth rising behind the Moon, in communications with Mission Control in Houston. What they did not send back in real time, <a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/video-from-artemis-ii-flyby-of-the-moon-will-not-initially-look-spectacular/">due to a lack of communications bandwidth</a>, was this high-resolution imagery.</p>
<p>That changed on Monday night, when Orion established an optical link with ground stations on Earth to send high-resolution images back to the planet. NASA has been uploading them to Johnson Space Center's <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasa2explore/with/55192132107">Flickr page</a>.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/the-artemis-ii-mission-sends-back-stunning-images-of-the-far-side-of-the-moon/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/the-artemis-ii-mission-sends-back-stunning-images-of-the-far-side-of-the-moon/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/55193002296_38b8afac3c_k-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/55193002296_38b8afac3c_k-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>NASA</media:credit><media:text>A close-up view taken by the Artemis II crew of Vavilov Crater on the rim of the older and larger Hertzsprung basin.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>The Rivian R2 will launch with 335 miles of range</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/rivian-r2-epa-certification-leaked-gets-335-miles-of-range/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/rivian-r2-epa-certification-leaked-gets-335-miles-of-range/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jonathan M. Gitlin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 14:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivian R2]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/rivian-r2-epa-certification-leaked-gets-335-miles-of-range/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The test document also shows the effect on range of fitting all-terrain tires.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>It won't be long before Rivian starts delivering the first of its new R2 SUVs to the lucky owners. After wowing everyone with its R1S and R1T, the startup is ready to enter more mainstream market segments, first with the midsize R2 this year. <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/03/rivian-reveals-pricing-and-trim-details-for-its-r2-suv/">Last month, we got pricing and trim details</a> for the new electric SUV: $57,990 for the R2 Performance, the only version that will be available until the $53,990 R2 Premium goes on sale in late 2026.</p>
<p>Both of these R2s use the same spec battery with a capacity of 87.9 kWh. At the time, Rivian said it expected at least 330 miles (531 km) of range from these models on 21-inch tires. But it seems that details of the actual Environmental Protection Agency range certification have leaked and were <a href="https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/threads/2027-rivian-r2-epa-certification-w-specs-range-battery-capacity-charging-rate-efficiency-etc.57814/">posted to the Rivian Forums</a>. And from those documents, we now know that, when fitted with 21-inch wheels and performance, the official EPA range estimate will be 335 miles (539 km).</p>
<p>The testing also generated an official EPA range estimate for the R2 when fitted with smaller 20-inch wheels. Usually, fitting smaller wheels to an EV increases range because the rotation of each wheel causes a lot of drag that saps range, and smaller, narrower wheels disturb less air. But in this case, the 20-inch wheels drop the EPA range estimate down to 314 miles (505 km), thanks to the knobby all-terrain tires.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/rivian-r2-epa-certification-leaked-gets-335-miles-of-range/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/rivian-r2-epa-certification-leaked-gets-335-miles-of-range/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>176</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/R2_GlacierWhiteExterior11-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/R2_GlacierWhiteExterior11-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Rivian</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Intel is going all-in on advanced chip packaging</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/intel-is-going-all-in-on-advanced-chip-packaging/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/intel-is-going-all-in-on-advanced-chip-packaging/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren Goode, wired.com]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 09:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips fab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSMC]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/intel-is-going-all-in-on-advanced-chip-packaging/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Intel is hoping to cash in on the AI boom. ]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Sixteen miles north of Albuquerque, in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, an <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/intel-arizona-fabrication-chips-trump-manufacturing/">Intel chip plant</a> sits on more than 200 acres of land. The site was established in the 1980s, part of it built on top of a sod farm. In 2007, as Intel’s business faltered, operations in one of the key fabs, Fab 9, came to a halt. Employees say families of raccoons and a badger took up residence in the space.</p>
<p>Then, in January 2024, the dormant fab was booted up again. Intel funneled billions into the facility, including $500 million it was granted from the US CHIPS Act. Now, Fab 9 and its neighbor, Fab 11X, are critical infrastructure for one of Intel’s quietly fast-growing businesses: advanced chip packaging.</p>
<p>Packaging involves combining multiple chiplets, or smaller components, onto a single, custom chip. Over the past six months, Intel has been signaling that its advanced packaging business, which operates within the Foundry chip-making arm of the company, is having a growth spurt. The company’s efforts around this have it going head-to-head with <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/tsmc-tariffs-trump-impacts/">Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation</a>, which far surpasses Intel’s production in terms of scale. But in an era where <a href="https://www.wired.com/tag/artificial-intelligence/">AI</a> is driving demand for all kinds of computing power, and leading nearly every major tech company to consider making its own custom chips, Intel thinks this effort can help it grab a bigger slice of the AI pie.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/intel-is-going-all-in-on-advanced-chip-packaging/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/intel-is-going-all-in-on-advanced-chip-packaging/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/intelfab-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/intelfab-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Intel</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Astronauts set distance record, revealing the Moon as a place to be explored</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/astronauts-set-distance-record-revealing-the-moon-as-a-place-to-be-explored/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/astronauts-set-distance-record-revealing-the-moon-as-a-place-to-be-explored/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Stephen Clark]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 03:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artemis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artemis II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human spaceflight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planetary science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar system]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/astronauts-set-distance-record-revealing-the-moon-as-a-place-to-be-explored/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["Humans have probably not evolved to see what we’re seeing. It is truly hard to describe. It is amazing."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>After staring at the Moon for almost eight hours Monday, the commander of NASA's Artemis II mission finally ran out of ways to describe what he was seeing.</p>
<p>"No matter how long we look at this, our brains are not processing this image in front of us. It is absolutely spectacular, surreal," said Reid Wiseman, the 50-year-old Navy test pilot leading the four-person crew circumnavigating the Moon. "There are no adjectives. I’m going need to invent some new ones to describe what we’re looking at outside this window."</p>
<p>Live images from the Orion spacecraft showed the Moon growing larger during final approach Monday. Video from GoPro cameras outside the capsule streamed down in low-resolution format, due to <a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/video-from-artemis-ii-flyby-of-the-moon-will-not-initially-look-spectacular/">limitations on bandwidth</a> coming back from deep space, but the Artemis II astronauts were expected to downlink sharper telephoto snapshots overnight Monday into Tuesday morning.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/astronauts-set-distance-record-revealing-the-moon-as-a-place-to-be-explored/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/astronauts-set-distance-record-revealing-the-moon-as-a-place-to-be-explored/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/55193180468_5de0cf977a_o-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/55193180468_5de0cf977a_o-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>NASA</media:credit><media:text>A crescent Earth slips behind the limb of the Moon in this view recorded by the Artemis II crew Monday.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>After court loss, RFK Jr. gives himself more power over CDC vaccine panel</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/after-court-loss-rfk-jr-gives-himself-more-power-over-cdc-vaccine-panel/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/after-court-loss-rfk-jr-gives-himself-more-power-over-cdc-vaccine-panel/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Beth Mole]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 22:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert f kennedy jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccine]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/after-court-loss-rfk-jr-gives-himself-more-power-over-cdc-vaccine-panel/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The charter renewal gives Kennedy broad authority to pick anyone for the panel.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Anti-vaccine Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has amended the charter of a federal vaccine advisory panel to seemingly grant himself more power to hand-pick members and loosen membership requirements, according to <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/06/2026-06577/advisory-committee-on-immunization-practices-acip-notice-of-charter-renewal">a notice published today in the Federal Register</a>.</p>
<p>The changes come after a federal judge last <a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/03/judge-temporarily-blocks-rfk-jr-s-changes-to-cdc-vaccine-recommendations/">month temporarily blocked advisors Kennedy had hand-selected</a>, following his firing of all 17 experts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The judge, US District Judge Brian Murphy, ruled that Kennedy's anti-vaccine-leaning picks largely lacked expertise in relevant fields as required under the current charter. They also failed to meet broader federal regulations that advisory committees be "fairly balanced" in representing the views within relevant fields.</p>
<p>"A committee of non-experts cannot be said to embody 'fairly balanced… points of view' within the relevant scientific community," Murphy wrote. "It is more accurate to say that they do not represent points of view within the relevant expert community."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/after-court-loss-rfk-jr-gives-himself-more-power-over-cdc-vaccine-panel/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/after-court-loss-rfk-jr-gives-himself-more-power-over-cdc-vaccine-panel/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GettyImages-2249270671-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GettyImages-2249270671-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty | Elijah Nouvelage</media:credit><media:text>Dr. Robert Malone speaks during a meeting of the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) at CDC Headquarters on December 4, 2025 in Atlanta. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>From folding boxes to fixing vacuums, GEN-1 robotics model hits 99% reliability</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/generalists-new-physical-robotics-ai-brings-production-level-success-rates/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/generalists-new-physical-robotics-ai-brings-production-level-success-rates/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Kyle Orland]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 22:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[training]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/generalists-new-physical-robotics-ai-brings-production-level-success-rates/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[New model can respond to disruptions and figure out moves it wasn't trained for.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Robotic machine-learning company Generalist has <a href="https://generalistai.com/blog/apr-02-2026-GEN-1">announced GEN-1</a>, a new physical AI system that it says "crosses into production-level success rates" on "a broad range of physical skills" that used to require the dexterity and muscle memory of human hands. Generalist is also touting the new model's ability to respond to disruptions by improvising new moves and "connect[ing] ideas from different places in order to solve new problems."</p>
<p>GEN-1 builds on Generalist's previous GEN-0 model, which the company <a href="https://generalistai.com/blog/nov-04-2025-GEN-0">touted in November</a> as a proof of concept for the applicability of scaling laws in robotics training, showing how more pre-training data and compute time improve post-training performance. But while large language models have been able to <a href="https://medium.com/nlplanet/two-minutes-generative-ai-when-will-llms-run-out-of-training-data-ff151dfb8410">effectively process trillions of words</a> collectively written on the Internet as part of their training, robotic models don't have a similar, readily accessible source of quality data about how humans manipulate objects.</p>
<p>To help solve this problem, Generalist has relied on <a href="https://boldstart.vc/news/generalistai-when-robots-start-to-improvise-welcome-to-boldstart/">"data hands,"</a> a set of wearable pincers that capture micro-movements and visual information as humans perform manual tasks. Generalist now claims it has collected over half a million hours and "petabytes of physical interaction data" to help train its physical model.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/generalists-new-physical-robotics-ai-brings-production-level-success-rates/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/generalists-new-physical-robotics-ai-brings-production-level-success-rates/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/gen1-1152x648.png" type="image/png" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/gen1-500x500-1775511749.png" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Generalist</media:credit><media:text>A composite showing many of the generalized tasks that Generalist's GEN-1 AI model can handle.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Sports bets on prediction markets ruled to be &quot;swaps,&quot; exempt from state laws</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/sports-bets-on-prediction-markets-ruled-to-be-swaps-exempt-from-state-laws/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/sports-bets-on-prediction-markets-ruled-to-be-swaps-exempt-from-state-laws/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kalshi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prediction markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/sports-bets-on-prediction-markets-ruled-to-be-swaps-exempt-from-state-laws/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Court rules US preempts states from applying gambling laws to prediction markets.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>A federal appeals court ruled that New Jersey cannot regulate sports bets on prediction markets because the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has exclusive jurisdiction.</p>
<p>Kalshi, which is registered with the CFTC as a designated contract market (DCM), last year won a <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.njd.564738/gov.uscourts.njd.564738.21.0.pdf">preliminary injunction</a> preventing the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement from enforcing a state law against its sports-related event contracts. The injunction issued by a district court was upheld today in a <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca3.125099/gov.uscourts.ca3.125099.105.0.pdf">2-1 decision</a> by judges at the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit.</p>
<p>The CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction over DCMs under the Commodity Exchange Act, a US law. The question in the Kalshi lawsuit is whether the CFTC's exclusive jurisdiction "preempts New Jersey gambling laws and the state constitution’s prohibition on collegiate sports betting," the appeals court majority wrote. "New Jersey frames the issue broadly (regulating all sports gambling) rather than narrowly (regulating trading on federally designated contract markets)."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/sports-bets-on-prediction-markets-ruled-to-be-swaps-exempt-from-state-laws/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/sports-bets-on-prediction-markets-ruled-to-be-swaps-exempt-from-state-laws/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/kalshi-death-markets-1152x648-1775509431.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/kalshi-death-markets-500x500-1775509438.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | Bloomberg</media:credit><media:text>An advertisement for prediction market Kalshi at a bus stop in Washington, DC, on Thursday, March 19, 2026.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Trump&#039;s next budget once again calls for massive cuts to science</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/trumps-next-budget-once-again-calls-for-massive-cuts-to-science/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/trumps-next-budget-once-again-calls-for-massive-cuts-to-science/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[John Timmer]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/trumps-next-budget-once-again-calls-for-massive-cuts-to-science/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Congress rejected huge cuts to science in 2026, but Trump is trying again.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>On Friday, the Trump administration <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/budget_fy2027.pdf">released its proposed budget</a> for 2027. The budget blueprint includes <a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/trump-proposes-steep-cut-to-nasa-budget-as-astronauts-head-for-the-moon/">significant cuts to NASA</a>, but it targets even more severe limits for other science-focused agencies, with no agencies spared. The document is laced with blatantly political language and resurfaces grievances that have been the subject of right-wing ire for years.</p>
<p>If all of this sounds familiar, it's because the document is largely a retread of <a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/05/trumps-2026-budget-proposal-crippling-cuts-for-science-across-the-board/">last year's proposal</a>, which Congress largely ignored in providing relatively steady research budgets. By choosing to issue a similar budget, the administration is signaling that this is an ongoing political battle. And the past year has shown that, even if Congress is unwilling to join it in the fight, the administration can still do significant damage to the scientific enterprise.</p>
<h2>What's proposed?</h2>
<p>Nearly everybody is in for a cut. The hardest-hit agencies, like the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), will see their budgets slashed in half. But even agencies that might be otherwise popular, like the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is overseen by Trump allies, will see $5 billion taken from its $47 billion budget. Agencies that have seemingly avoided political controversies, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), would also see their budgets cut by over half.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/trumps-next-budget-once-again-calls-for-massive-cuts-to-science/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/trumps-next-budget-once-again-calls-for-massive-cuts-to-science/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/GettyImages-2223415789-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/GettyImages-2223415789-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty | Al Drago</media:credit><media:text>Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), during a television interview at the White House in Washington, DC, on Monday, July 7, 2025. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>“The problem is Sam Altman”: OpenAI insiders don’t trust CEO</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/the-problem-is-sam-altman-openai-insiders-dont-trust-ceo/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/the-problem-is-sam-altman-openai-insiders-dont-trust-ceo/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ashley Belanger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sam altman]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/the-problem-is-sam-altman-openai-insiders-dont-trust-ceo/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[OpenAI brainstorms ways AI can benefit humanity in effort to counter bad vibes.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>On the same day that OpenAI <a href="https://openai.com/index/industrial-policy-for-the-intelligence-age/">released</a> policy recommendations to ensure that AI benefits humanity if superintelligence is ever achieved, The New Yorker dropped a <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may-control-our-future-can-he-be-trusted">massive investigation</a> into whether CEO Sam Altman can be trusted to actually follow through on OpenAI's biggest promises.</p>
<p>Parsing the publications side by side can be disorienting.</p>
<p>On the one hand, OpenAI said it plans to push for policies to "keep people first" as AI starts "outperforming the smartest humans even when they are assisted by AI." To achieve this, the company vows to remain "clear-eyed" and transparent about risks, which it acknowledged includes monitoring for extreme scenarios like AI systems evading human control or governments deploying AI to undermine democracy. Without proper mitigation of such risks, "people will be harmed," OpenAI warned, before describing how the company could be trusted to advocate for a future where achieving superintelligence means a "higher quality of life for all."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/the-problem-is-sam-altman-openai-insiders-dont-trust-ceo/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/the-problem-is-sam-altman-openai-insiders-dont-trust-ceo/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2236544323-1024x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1024" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2236544323-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Bloomberg / Contributor | Bloomberg</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>NASA&#039;s Moon ship and rocket seem to be working well, so what about the landers?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/nasas-moon-ship-and-rocket-seem-to-be-working-well-so-what-about-the-landers/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/nasas-moon-ship-and-rocket-seem-to-be-working-well-so-what-about-the-landers/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Eric Berger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 18:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artemis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue origin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunar lander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spacex]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/nasas-moon-ship-and-rocket-seem-to-be-working-well-so-what-about-the-landers/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Lori Glaze: "We have seen real commitment to try and do that... from both Blue and from SpaceX."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>As we have been <a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/">reporting on Ars</a>, NASA's Artemis II lunar mission has been going rather well so far. Of course, Orion's big test is yet to come with the fiery reentry through Earth's atmosphere on Friday. But so far, it's looking like the rocket and spaceship needed for a lunar landing are getting there for NASA.</p>
<p>The biggest remaining piece of the architecture, therefore, is a lunar lander. Known in NASA parlance as the Human Landing System, or HLS, the space agency has contracted with SpaceX for its Starship vehicle and Blue Origin and its Blue Moon lander.</p>
<p>Last year, NASA asked both companies for options to accelerate their lunar landers, and both replied that not having to dock with the Lunar Gateway in a highly elliptical orbit, known as near-rectilinear halo orbit, would help a lot. So the space agency has removed that requirement.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/nasas-moon-ship-and-rocket-seem-to-be-working-well-so-what-about-the-landers/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/nasas-moon-ship-and-rocket-seem-to-be-working-well-so-what-about-the-landers/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>122</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/NHQ202603240060medium-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/NHQ202603240060medium-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>NASA</media:credit><media:text>Lori Glaze's full title is acting associate administrator for NASA's Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Teardown of unreleased LG Rollable shows why rollable phones aren&#039;t a thing</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/teardown-of-unreleased-lg-rollable-shows-why-rollable-phones-arent-a-thing/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/teardown-of-unreleased-lg-rollable-shows-why-rollable-phones-arent-a-thing/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ryan Whitwam]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 17:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teardown]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/teardown-of-unreleased-lg-rollable-shows-why-rollable-phones-arent-a-thing/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[LG almost released a rollable smartphone in 2021, and this is what it looked like inside.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>LG was once a heavyweight in the smartphone industry, trading blows with hometown rival Samsung. However, as smartphone sales plateaued, the company struggled to stay competitive. In 2021, LG <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/lg-claims-its-rollable-screen-smartphone-is-coming-early-this-year/">planned to make waves with a rollable phone</a>, but it never moved beyond the teaser phase. Five years after LG <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/04/after-a-decade-of-failure-lg-officially-quits-the-smartphone-market/">threw in the towel on smartphones</a>, the LG Rollable has appeared in a YouTube teardown that demonstrates why this form factor never took off.</p>
<p>The LG Rollable is just one of several rollable concept phones that appeared throughout the early 2020s. Flexible OLED screens had finally become affordable, leading to foldable phones like the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold. Although, "affordable" is relative here. Foldables were and still are very expensive devices. Based on what we can see of the complex inner workings of the LG Rollable, these devices may have commanded even higher prices.</p>
<p>Noted YouTube phone destroyer JerryRigEverything managed to snag a working prototype LG Rollable. It may even be the unit LG demoed at CES 2021. The device looks like a regular phone at first glance, but a quick swipe activates the motor, which unfurls additional screen real estate from around the back. This makes the viewable area about 40 percent larger without the added thickness of a foldable.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/teardown-of-unreleased-lg-rollable-shows-why-rollable-phones-arent-a-thing/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/teardown-of-unreleased-lg-rollable-shows-why-rollable-phones-arent-a-thing/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/LG-rollable-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/LG-rollable-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>JerryRigEverything</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Used EV sales spike alongside gas prices</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/used-ev-sales-spike-alongside-gas-prices/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/used-ev-sales-spike-alongside-gas-prices/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Christian Davies, Financial Times]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 13:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Used EVs]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/used-ev-sales-spike-alongside-gas-prices/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The market for new cars has slumped as Americans look for deals on used EVs.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Sales of used electric vehicles are surging in the US as models bought during a post-pandemic boom flood back onto the market, offering prospective buyers relief from a sharp rise in petrol prices.</p>
<p>First-quarter used EV sales rose 12 percent compared with the same period last year and 17 percent on the previous quarter, according to Cox Automotive estimates. Sales of new EVs in the first quarter are estimated to have slumped by 28 percent year on year following the Trump administration’s withdrawal in 2025 of a $7,500 consumer tax credit.</p>
<p>Analysts attribute the surge to a glut of hundreds of thousands of cheap pre-owned EVs that were purchased on leases in the early 2020s and which are now returning to market as those leases expire. According to credit bureau Experian, EVs will account for 15 percent of all off-lease vehicles at the end of this year, up from 7.7 percent in the first quarter.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/used-ev-sales-spike-alongside-gas-prices/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/used-ev-sales-spike-alongside-gas-prices/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>286</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Lyriq-charging-1024x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1024" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Lyriq-charging-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>General Motors</media:credit><media:text>The Cadillac Lyriq is one of a new range of EVs built by General Motors using a new common battery and motor platform. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Why will today&#039;s lunar flyby only beam back low-resolution video?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/video-from-artemis-ii-flyby-of-the-moon-will-not-initially-look-spectacular/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/video-from-artemis-ii-flyby-of-the-moon-will-not-initially-look-spectacular/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Robert Pearlman]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 12:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artemis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artemis II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downlink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flyby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intuitive machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Fischer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunar relay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical communications demonstration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space history]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/video-from-artemis-ii-flyby-of-the-moon-will-not-initially-look-spectacular/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["Don't expect hi-res video." ]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Humanity is about to get its first in-person, up-close look at the Moon in more than half a century.</p>
<p>Four astronauts will spend about seven hours on Monday observing the far side of the Moon, the half that constantly points away from Earth. At their closest approach on board their Orion spacecraft <em>Integrity</em>, Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch of NASA and Jeremy Hansen with the Canadian Space Agency will be about 4,000 miles (6,400 km) above the surface. The last time any person came that close was during the Apollo 17 mission in 1972.</p>
<p>You can tune into the webcast <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-j1uxBmis0">here</a>, starting at 1 pm ET.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/video-from-artemis-ii-flyby-of-the-moon-will-not-initially-look-spectacular/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/video-from-artemis-ii-flyby-of-the-moon-will-not-initially-look-spectacular/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>163</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/news-040626a-lg-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/news-040626a-lg-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>NASA/collectSPACE.com</media:credit><media:text>An exaggerated, pixelated version of a photo of the moon taken by an Artemis II crew member at the fourth day of the mission. Oriented with the South Pole at the top and beginning to see parts of the lunar far side, the pixellation simulates the low-res video feed viewers will see today.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>What Memento reveals about human nature, 25 years later</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/04/memento-turns-25/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/04/memento-turns-25/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jennifer Ouellette]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 12:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film anniversaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newmarket]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/04/memento-turns-25/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Director Christopher Nolan's breakout film explores themes of the nature of memory and personal identity.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Christopher Nolan has cemented his status as one of our most consistently original and thought-provoking directors. Over the last 25 years, Nolan has delivered film after film that deftly balances mainstream appeal with eye-popping visuals, inventive narrative structures and special effects, and existential and/or philosophical themes. And it all started with his big breakthrough film: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memento_(film)"><em>Memento</em></a>, which marks the 25th anniversary this year of its US release.</p>
<p><strong>(Spoilers below, but we'll give you a heads up before the major reveals.)</strong></p>
<p>The origins of <em>Memento</em> are now the stuff of Hollywood legend. Nolan's brother, Jonathan, pitched him a story during a road trip about a man with <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anterograde_amnesia">anterograde amnesia</a> who can't form new lasting memories and yet is intent on tracking down and killing the man who raped and killed his wife. Nolan liked the idea, and Jonathan sent him a draft a few months later. (That draft would eventually become Jonathan's short story, "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memento_Mori_(short_story)">Memento Mori</a>," published after the film's release.)</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/04/memento-turns-25/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/04/memento-turns-25/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/memento2-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/memento2-500x500-1775336851.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Newmarket</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>CBP facility codes sure seem to have leaked via online flashcards</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/cbp-facility-codes-sure-seem-to-have-leaked-via-online-flashcards/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/cbp-facility-codes-sure-seem-to-have-leaked-via-online-flashcards/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Sammy Sussman, WIRED.com]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 11:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customs and Border Patrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration and customs enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/cbp-facility-codes-sure-seem-to-have-leaked-via-online-flashcards/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Quizlet flashcards seem to include sensitive information about gate security at CBP locations.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>A user on Quizlet, an online learning platform, created a public flashcard set in February that appears to have exposed highly confidential information about security procedures in US <a href="https://www.wired.com/tag/customs-border-protection/">Customs and Border Protection</a> facilities around Kingsville, Texas.</p>
<p>The Quizlet set, titled “USBP Review,” was available to the public until March 20, when it was made private less than half an hour after WIRED messaged a phone number potentially linked to the Quizlet user. Though an individual with the user’s name was listed at an address of an apartment less than a mile from a Kingsville CBP facility, WIRED has not been able to verify that the flashcard set was created by an active CBP agent or contractor.</p>
<p>“This incident is being reviewed by CBP’s Office of Professional Responsibility,” a CBP spokesperson wrote in a statement to WIRED. “We will not be getting ahead of this review. A review should not be taken as an indication of wrongdoing.”</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/cbp-facility-codes-sure-seem-to-have-leaked-via-online-flashcards/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/cbp-facility-codes-sure-seem-to-have-leaked-via-online-flashcards/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>103</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/GettyImages-925067740-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/GettyImages-925067740-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Joe Raedle/Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>A patch is seen on the sleeve of a U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer as he uses facial recognition technology in his booth at Miami International Airport to screen a traveler entering the United States on February 27, 2018 in Miami, Florida. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>