<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!--
This is 512 bytes of nonsense, since the Firefox 2 developers and IE7
developers and Safari RSS developers decided that they would make
obsolete declared XML styles by overriding them without permission.
Their own styles seem to be of varying quality, and importantly do not
integrate Feedburner's services, which hopefully are of real use to
subscribers and potential subscribers. Therefore, we use this unofficial
workaround, which consists of filling up the first 512 bytes of a
document so that the sniffer doesn't encounter the RSS tag in time to
autodetect it. Now, without further ado, we present you with a valid
XML feed, presented in the manner we have chosen to offer it.
-->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >    
    <channel>
    <title>Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs - South Korea</title>
    <link>http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 23:39:18 -0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 23:39:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>BCSIA</generator>    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>webmaster@belfercenter.org</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@belfercenter.org</webMaster>
    <copyright>Copyright 2017 Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs</copyright>
    <dc:publisher>Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs - Kennedy School of Government - Harvard Univeristy</dc:publisher>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Would South Korea Really Go Nuclear?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27227/would_south_korea_really_go_nuclear.html</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 15:19:01 -0600</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>"Until recently, calls for nuclear armament were considered extremist in South Korean political discourse. However, public support for nuclear armament is growing in South Korea due to North Korea’s nuclear provocations. In a recent Gallup Korea poll, 58 percent supported nuclear armament. If the U.S. security guarantee is not credible in the minds of South Koreans, and nuclear armament is the only way to defend South Korea’s security from North Korea, a nuclear option will seem even more appealing to the public."</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Lami Kim</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27227/would_south_korea_really_go_nuclear.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[A Cherished Moment with JFK]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27223/cherished_moment_with_jfk.html</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:30:10 -0600</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I suspect you may not be aware of the similarities between Secretary-General <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/ban-ki-moon/">Ban Ki-moon</a> and President <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/john-f-kennedy/">John F. Kennedy</a>.</p>
<p>While  most observers will be most impressed by their differences, I  note a  significant similarity: their determined purposefulness.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Graham Allison</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27223/cherished_moment_with_jfk.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Ambassador David Saperstein talks TPP, ISIL, and the next administration]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27134/ambassador_david_saperstein_talks_tpp_isil_and_the_next_administration.html</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:49:02 -0600</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[November 28, 2016<br /><p> </p>
<p>David Saperstein, U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Religious Freedom, spoke on Monday, November 14<sup>th</sup> at the Harvard Kennedy School on “U.S. Efforts to Promote Religious Freedom Abroad.” In a wide-ranging discussion moderated by Future of Diplomacy Project Executive Director Cathryn Clüver, the diplomat and rabbi explained the importance of religion and human rights as part of an integrated approach to foreign policy.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Cathryn Clüver</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27134/ambassador_david_saperstein_talks_tpp_isil_and_the_next_administration.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Managing Risk in an Unstable World]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27135/managing_risk_in_an_unstable_world.html</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:27:57 -0600</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[November 11, 2016<br /><p>Dr. Ian Bremmer, expert in political risk and founder of the Eurasia Group, gave a seminar sponsored by the the Future of Diplomacy Project on Thursday, November 9 at the Harvard Kennedy School, titled “Managing Risk in an Unstable World."</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Nicholas Burns</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27135/managing_risk_in_an_unstable_world.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Can the United States Command the Commons in East Asia?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26894/can_the_united_states_command_the_commons_in_east_asia.html</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:25:57 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>This policy brief is based on "<a href="http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/26871/">Future  Warfare in the Western Pacific: Chinese Antiaccess/Area Denial, U.S.  AirSea Battle, and Command of the Commons in East Asia</a>," which appears in the summer 2016 issue of <em>International Security</em>.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Stephen Biddle and Ivan Oelrich</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26894/can_the_united_states_command_the_commons_in_east_asia.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Nuclear Debates in Asia]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27145/nuclear_debates_in_asia.html</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 15:48:13 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>This important book analyzes nuclear weapon and energy policies in Asia, a region at risk for high-stakes military competition, conflict, and terrorism. The contributors explore the trajectory of debates over nuclear energy, security, and nonproliferation in key countries—China, India, Japan, Pakistan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, and other states in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Hui Zhang</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27145/nuclear_debates_in_asia.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[China: Evolving Attitudes on Nuclear Affairs]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27144/china.html</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 15:45:38 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>This important book analyzes nuclear weapon and energy policies in Asia, a region at risk for high-stakes military competition, conflict, and terrorism. The contributors explore the trajectory of debates over nuclear energy, security, and nonproliferation in key countries—China, India, Japan, Pakistan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, and other states in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Hui Zhang</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/27144/china.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[North Korea poses rising threat for next president]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26761/north_korea_poses_rising_threat_for_next_president.html</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:15:58 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Sometime over the next several years, the next U.S. president could confront a genuinely dangerous threat from a faraway place — a North Korean missile that can hit U.S. territory with a nuclear warhead. David Ignatius, Senior Fellow with the Future of Diplomacy Project examines the threat from across the Pacific.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>David Ignatius</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26761/north_korea_poses_rising_threat_for_next_president.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Will America's Asian Allies Go Nuclear?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26590/will_americas_asian_allies_go_nuclear.html</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 10:44:42 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[May 4, 2016<br /><p>"In Northeast Asia, where national security still overwhelmingly dominates  the perspectives and behavior of states, nuclear proliferation, both  vertical and horizontal, is gaining stronger momentum. China’s recent  but substantial investment in modernizing its nuclear arsenal and  improving its <a href="http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NP-Nuclear-plans-revealed-in-Chinas-new-Five-Year-Plan-2303166.html?mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRonu6zNdu%2FhmjTEU5z16O8rXqK3lMI%2F0ER3fOvrPUfGjI4IRMpqI%2BSLDwEYGJlv6SgFSrnAMbBwzLgFWhI%3D">reprocessing capacity</a> is alarming its neighbors, as well as the United States. The nuclear  pursuits of North Korea and, in particular, the acceleration of nuclear  and missile tests seem to be spiraling, whereas diplomatic efforts to  stop Pyongyang's nuclear path have been futile to date. In addition to  its fourth nuclear test in January 2016, a series of missile and rocket  tests and the recent <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missile-idUSKCN0XK08U">firing of a submarine-launched ballistic missile</a> (SLBM), Pyongyang is reportedly preparing another nuclear weapons test in the coming months..."</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Se Young Jang</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26590/will_americas_asian_allies_go_nuclear.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[The Evolution of US Extended Deterrence and South Korea’s Nuclear Ambitions]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26550/evolution_of_us_extended_deterrence_and_south_koreas_nuclear_ambitions.html</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:28:08 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Extended deterrence has been a main pillar of the security alliance  between the United States and South Korea (Republic of Korea [ROK])  since the end of the Korean War. The changing dynamics of US extended  deterrence in Korea, however, affected Seoul’s strategic choices within  its bilateral alliance relationship with Washington. Examining the  evolution of US extended deterrence in the Korean Peninsula until the  Nixon administration, this article explains why South Korea began its  nuclear weapons programme in a historical context of the US–ROK alliance  relationship. This article argues that President Park Chung-hee’s  increasing uncertainty about the US security commitment to South Korea  in the 1960s led to his decision to develop nuclear weapons in the early  1970s despite the fact that US tactical nuclear weapons were still  stationed in South Korea.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Se Young Jang</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26550/evolution_of_us_extended_deterrence_and_south_koreas_nuclear_ambitions.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Addressing Japanese Atrocities]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26519/addressing_japanese_atrocities.html</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:53:50 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>"Some may argue that the US government bears no moral responsibility, as it did not directly participate in this human experimentation. But the United States declined to hold many of the perpetrators accountable, and benefited materially as well. US government officials were interested in the potential utility of the work of Ishii and other Japanese, however unethical, to the US military. Senior American officials felt that obtaining data from the experiments was more valuable than bringing those involved to justice, because the information could be used to advance the US government’s own weapons development program."</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Zachary D. Kaufman</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26519/addressing_japanese_atrocities.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Reviewing the Administration’s Nuclear Agenda]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26393/reviewing_the_administrations_nuclear_agenda.html</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:10:40 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Senior Fellow William Tobey testified on March 17, 2016, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on "Reviewing the Administration’s Nuclear Agenda." </em></p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>William H. Tobey</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26393/reviewing_the_administrations_nuclear_agenda.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Diplomat, Asia Expert Kurt Campbell Joins Belfer Center as Senior Fellow]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26341/diplomat_asia_expert_kurt_campbell_joins_belfer_center_as_senior_fellow.html</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:18:30 -0600</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Kurt Campbell, Chairman and CEO of The Asia Group, LLC, and former  Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, has  been named a Senior Fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for  Science and International Affairs. Widely credited with framing the  Obama administration’s rebalance to Asia, Campbell will focus his  research at the Belfer Center on his forthcoming book, <em>The Pivot: America’s Rediscovery of the Asia-Pacific Century</em>.</p>]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26341/diplomat_asia_expert_kurt_campbell_joins_belfer_center_as_senior_fellow.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[High Stakes at the Sunnylands Summit]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26305/high_stakes_at_the_sunnylands_summit.html</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:12:37 -0600</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>As President Obama prepares to host a summit  with ASEAN leaders in Sunnylands, California, next week, Center for a  New American Security (CNAS) <a href="http://www.cnas.org/research/regions-and-states/asia-pacific-security">Asia-Pacific Security</a> Program Director <a href="http://www.cnas.org/CroninPatrick">Patrick Cronin</a> and Pereira International CEO <a href="http://www.pereiraintl.com/about-us/">Derwin Pereira</a> have written a new commentary for CNAS titled “High Stakes at the Sunnylands Summit.” The commentary is a product of CNAS’ <a href="http://www.cnas.org/derwin-pereira-southeast-asian-policy-roundtables">Derwin Pereira Southeast Asian Foreign Policy Roundtables</a>.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Derwin Pereira and Patrick Cronin</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26305/high_stakes_at_the_sunnylands_summit.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Reducing the Use of Highly Enriched Uranium in Civilian Research Reactors]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26271/reducing_the_use_of_highly_enriched_uranium_in_civilian_research_reactors.html</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:01:22 -0600</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Reducing the Use of Highly Enriched Uranium in Civilian Research Reactors</em> is a report of the Committee on the Current Status of and Progress Toward Eliminating Highly Enriched Uranium Use in Fuel for Civilian Research and Test Reactors. The committee was established by the Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report is the result of a congressionally mandated study (P.L. 112-239, Section 31781) to assess improvement in reducing highly enriched uranium use in fuel for civilian research and test reactors.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Belfer Center Senior Fellow William Tobey is a member of the Committee that produced the report.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>William H. Tobey</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/26271/reducing_the_use_of_highly_enriched_uranium_in_civilian_research_reactors.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Proliferation Alert! The IAEA and Non-Compliance Reporting]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/25896/proliferation_alert_the_iaea_and_noncompliance_reporting.html</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:56:11 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[October 20, 2015<br /><p>In this new report, Trevor Findlay provides the first comprehensive study of the IAEA's handling of states not complying with their non-proliferation obligations. The report finds that none of the cases have followed the non-compliance process outlined in the Agency's Statute and safeguards agreements. Rather, each case has posed unique challenges to the non-proliferation regime. The report concludes that creativity and deft statecraft are key to the handling of complex non-compliance cases.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Trevor Findlay</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/25896/proliferation_alert_the_iaea_and_noncompliance_reporting.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[The Repercussions of South Korea’s Pro-Nuclear Energy Policy]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/25840/repercussions_of_south_koreas_pronuclear_energy_policy.html</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 09:09:15 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[October 8, 2015<br /><p>"South Korea has been trying to develop its nuclear energy industry over half a century. Insufficient energy sources, increasing domestic energy consumption, and rising oil prices in the 1970s were significant drivers that turned South Korea into a nuclear energy producer. Today, the country runs 24 nuclear reactors in four nuclear power plant sites, the second highest number of reactors among Asian countries after Japan and fifth highest in the world. Despite the contribution of nuclear energy to the South Korean economy, however, the country is currently facing mounting domestic concerns over its pro-nuclear energy policy."</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Se Young Jang</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/25840/repercussions_of_south_koreas_pronuclear_energy_policy.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Rescuing the free trade deals]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/25455/rescuing_the_free_trade_deals.html</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:25:44 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[June 14, 2015<br /><p>The Senate’s <a title="www.cfr.org" href="http://www.cfr.org/international-organizations-and-alliances/why-did-united-states-fail-join-league-nations/p30709">rejection</a> of President Wo odrow Wilson’s commitment of the United States to the League of Nations was the greatest setback to U.S. global leadership of the last century. While not remotely as consequential, the votes in the House last week that, unless revisited, would doom the Trans-Pacific Partnership send the same kind of negative signal regarding the willingness of the United States to take responsibility for the global system at a critical time.</p>
<p>The repudiation of the TPP would neuter the U.S. presidency for the next 19&#8201;months. It would reinforce global concerns that the vicissitudes of domestic politics are increasingly rendering the United States a less reliable ally. Coming on top of the American failure to either stop or join the <a title="www.npr.org" href="http://www.npr.org/2015/04/16/400178364/finance-officials-to-discuss-asian-development-bank-at-spring-meetings">Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank</a>, it would signal a lack of U.S. commitment to Asia at a time when China is flexing its muscles. It would leave the grand strategy of rebalancing U.S. foreign policy toward Asia with no meaningful nonmilitary component. And it would strengthen the hands of companies overseas at the expense of U.S. firms. Ultimately, having a world in which U.S. companies systematically lose ground to foreign rivals would not work out to the advantage of American workers.</p>
<p>Both the House and Senate have now delivered majorities for the trade promotion authority necessary to complete the TPP. The problem is with the complementary trade assistance measures that most Republicans do not support and that Democrats are <a title="www.washingtonpost.com" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trade-fail/2015/06/12/3ef3a848-1144-11e5-9726-49d6fa26a8c6_story.html">opposing in order to bring down the TPP</a>. It is to be fervently hoped that a way through will be found to avoid a catastrophe for U.S. economic leadership. Perhaps success can be achieved if the TPP’s advocates can acknowledge that rather than being a model for future trade agreements, this debate should lead to careful reflection on the role of trade agreements in America’s international economic strategy.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Lawrence Summers</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/25455/rescuing_the_free_trade_deals.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Fresh Ideas for the Future: Symposium on the NPT Nuclear Disarmament, Non-proliferation, and Energy]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/25281/fresh_ideas_for_the_future.html</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:01:44 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[April 30, 2015<br /><p>On April 28, the Project on Managing the Atom joined the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, The Netherlands government, and the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) in convening nuclear nonproliferation experts from around the world at the United Nations to participate in a Symposium on the 2015 Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference.</p>]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/25281/fresh_ideas_for_the_future.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[The Strategic Logic of Nuclear Proliferation]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24785/strategic_logic_of_nuclear_proliferation.html</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:43:19 -0600</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>When do states acquire nuclear weapons? History shows that only two types of states decide that the bomb is essential to their security: 1) very powerful states; and 2) weak states that lack ironclad security guarantees.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Nuno Monteiro and Alexandre Debs</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24785/strategic_logic_of_nuclear_proliferation.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Racing toward Tragedy? China's Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24782/racing_toward_tragedy_chinas_rise_military_competition_in_the_asia_pacific_and_the_security_dilemma.html</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:56:59 -0600</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Claims that the Asia Pacific is ripe for military competition and conflict are overstated. China's surging economy and military spending have contributed to security dilemmas in the region, as have specific conflicts of interest—for instance, over territory. Measures are available, however, to mitigate the action-reaction dynamics of mutual fear, suspicion, and insecurity.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Adam P. Liff and G. John Ikenberry</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24782/racing_toward_tragedy_chinas_rise_military_competition_in_the_asia_pacific_and_the_security_dilemma.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[The Lessons of 1914 for East Asia Today: Missing the Trees for the Forest]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24492/lessons_of_1914_for_east_asia_today.html</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:47:10 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>The ubiquitous comparison drawn between pre–World War I Anglo-German antagonism and current U.S.-China relations is flawed. Instead, the outbreak of war in 1914 offers specific lessons for contemporary East Asia concerning the dangers of complex security arrangements, nationalism, and repeated crises.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Ja Ian Chong and Todd Hall</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24492/lessons_of_1914_for_east_asia_today.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[It's Not About the Oil--It's About the Tiny Rocks]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24473/its_not_about_the_oilits_about_the_tiny_rocks.html</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:15:33 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>As China jousts with Japan, Vietnam, the Philippines, and other neighbors over contested maritime territory, the conventional wisdom is that energy concerns are a motivating force. China claims virtually the entire South China Sea -- a claim disputed by its neighbors (most notably Vietnam and the Philippines) -- and there have been an increasing number of conflicts in recent years over who has the right to exploit the energy resources under the seabed in disputed waters.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Holly Morrow</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24473/its_not_about_the_oilits_about_the_tiny_rocks.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[South Korea's Rise: Economic Development, Power, and Foreign Relations]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24435/south_koreas_rise.html</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:53:29 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>South Korea's phenomenal rise has been studied extensively by political scientists and economists both in terms of its impact on democratisation and as a role model for economic development. Yet little attention has been devoted to exploring the nexus between economic development and foreign policy. As a rising middle power, analysis of South Korea's foreign policy is crucial to our understanding of the power structure and future relations in East Asia.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Uk Heo and Terence Roehrig</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24435/south_koreas_rise.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[The Case for a Nuclear-free South]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24329/case_for_a_nuclearfree_south.html</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:33:53 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>"Washington has long provided a credible security guarantee along with its declaration of the nuclear umbrella in part, in return for South Korea forgoing a nuclear option. South Korea's acquisition of nuclear weapons would remove the rationale for the extension of U.S. nuclear deterrence and undermine the U.S. security commitment to Seoul."</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Terence Roehrig</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24329/case_for_a_nuclearfree_south.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Hot off the Presses]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24202/hot_off_the_presses.html</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 07:03:05 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>A sampling of recent books from Belfer Center affiliates.<strong> </strong></p>]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24202/hot_off_the_presses.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Pay No Attention to that Panda Behind the Curtain]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24157/pay_no_attention_to_that_panda_behind_the_curtain.html</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:15:13 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>"...America's Asian partners shouldn't question the U.S. commitment to maintain its military presence in Asia and its security commitments to its various Asian partners. This policy is rooted in geopolitics and America's own strategic interests. Obama could do everyone a favor if he explained this to his hosts in simple, clear, and forceful terms, and reminded them that the U.S. security presence has been a powerful bulwark of regional stability for decades."</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Stephen M. Walt</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24157/pay_no_attention_to_that_panda_behind_the_curtain.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Assistant Secretary Russel Visits Harvard]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24295/assistant_secretary_russel_visits_harvard.html</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:39:33 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[April 23, 2014<br /><p>Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel  Russel spoke at an “off-the-record” breakfast seminar at the Harvard  Kennedy School on April 18.</p>]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24295/assistant_secretary_russel_visits_harvard.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[South Korea: An Alliance in Transition]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24126/south_korea.html</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:22:50 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>For sixty years, the United States has maintained an extensive network of military bases on the Korean Peninsula to ensure South Korea's security. An alliance that lasts for over half a century is likely to evolve as power configurations and the security environment change; this has certainly been the case for the U.S.–South Korea alliance. This chapter examines the key dimensions of this evolution as they alter the U.S. military presence in South Korea.</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Terence Roehrig</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24126/south_korea.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Reassuring Jittery Asian Allies]]></title>

        <link>http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24077/reassuring_jittery_asian_allies.html</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:12:04 -0500</pubDate>
        <description><![CDATA[April 4, 2014<br /><p>"It is time for the Obama administration to concentrate with a laser-like precision on an urgent strategic challenge: not the FAA, but PAA—perceptions of American allies. By tacitly acquiescing to China's air defense zone, the United States deepened the pervasive perception among our Asian allies—grounded in a long history of U.S. ambivalent behavior towards its friends in the region—that it is an unreliable security patron, increasing their temptation to explore alternative security assurance options, including nuclear weapons."</p>]]></description>
        <dc:creator>Eugene B. Kogan</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/24077/reassuring_jittery_asian_allies.html</guid>
						
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
    