<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife</link>
	<description>Beliefnet Voices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:10:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Another Blog To Enjoy!!!</title>
		<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2012/08/another-blog-to-enjoy.html</link>
		<comments>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2012/08/another-blog-to-enjoy.html#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jgordon1]]></dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for visiting Religion and Public Life. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beliefnet.com/News/index.aspx">Latest News Story on Beliefnet</a></p>
<p>Happy Reading!</p>
<p>&nbsp;...
<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2012/08/another-blog-to-enjoy.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2012/08/another-blog-to-enjoy.html">Another Blog To Enjoy!!!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thank you for visiting Religion and Public Life. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy:

<a href="http://www.beliefnet.com/News/index.aspx">Latest News Story on Beliefnet</a>

Happy Reading!

&nbsp;...<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2012/08/another-blog-to-enjoy.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2012/08/another-blog-to-enjoy.html">Another Blog To Enjoy!!!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2012/08/another-blog-to-enjoy.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ayn Rand Republicans</title>
		<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/the.html</link>
		<comments>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/the.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 23:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Silk]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I confess to feeling a little bit queasy about the <a href="http://americanvaluesnetwork.org/aynrandvsjesus/">American Values Network's new video</a> hoisting Rep. Paul Ryan, Sen. Rand Paul, Rush Limbaugh, and other GOP luminaries on the petard of Ayn Rand and her atheistic philosophy of objectivism. Take a look.</p>
<p>Yes, it's delicious. But what's the precise point? In his email announcement, AVN executive director Eric Sapp puts it this way:<br />
Republican leaders are praising Ayn Rand and...
<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/the.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/the.html">The Ayn Rand Republicans</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[I confess to feeling a little bit queasy about the <a href="http://americanvaluesnetwork.org/aynrandvsjesus/" target="_blank">American Values Network's new video</a> hoisting Rep. Paul Ryan, Sen. Rand Paul, Rush Limbaugh, and other GOP luminaries on the petard of Ayn Rand and her atheistic philosophy of objectivism. Take a look.



Yes, it's delicious. But what's the precise point? In his email announcement, AVN executive director Eric Sapp puts it this way:
Republican leaders are praising Ayn Rand and...<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/the.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/the.html">The Ayn Rand Republicans</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/the.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whither evangelicals?</title>
		<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/whither-evangelicals.html</link>
		<comments>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/whither-evangelicals.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Silk]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Republican Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Daniles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm fully prepared to believe that Mitch Daniels' family proved to be the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/us/politics/23repubs.html?_r=1&amp;hp">unleapable hurdle</a> in his abortive run-up to the GOP presidential race. Imagine yourself  as wife Cheri, having split for the coast to marry on old flame, your  husband and young daughters left behind in Boone County, Indiana, and  then returned to the nest four years later, going head-to-head with the  most assiduously maternal First...
<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/whither-evangelicals.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/whither-evangelicals.html">Whither evangelicals?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm fully prepared to believe that Mitch Daniels' family proved to be the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/us/politics/23repubs.html?_r=1&amp;hp" target="_blank">unleapable hurdle</a> in his abortive run-up to the GOP presidential race. Imagine yourself  as wife Cheri, having split for the coast to marry on old flame, your  husband and young daughters left behind in Boone County, Indiana, and  then returned to the nest four years later, going head-to-head with the  most assiduously maternal First...<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/whither-evangelicals.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/whither-evangelicals.html">Whither evangelicals?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/whither-evangelicals.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No more &#8220;social conservatives&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/no-more-social-conservatives.html</link>
		<comments>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/no-more-social-conservatives.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 12:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Silk]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Republican Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the presidential election cycle getting up to speed, it's time for  reporters and yakkers like me to stop writing about "social  conservatives" as if they were an identifiable segment of the voting  population. I say this as someone who has happily been using the term <a href="http://www.spiritual-politics.org/2008/12/the_new_establishment.html">since late 2008</a>,  when it looked like the religious right was at least organizationally  in eclipse, and that the GOP was engaged in a struggle...
<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/no-more-social-conservatives.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/no-more-social-conservatives.html">No more &#8220;social conservatives&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[With the presidential election cycle getting up to speed, it's time for  reporters and yakkers like me to stop writing about "social  conservatives" as if they were an identifiable segment of the voting  population. I say this as someone who has happily been using the term <a href="http://www.spiritual-politics.org/2008/12/the_new_establishment.html" target="_blank">since late 2008</a>,  when it looked like the religious right was at least organizationally  in eclipse, and that the GOP was engaged in a struggle...<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/no-more-social-conservatives.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/no-more-social-conservatives.html">No more &#8220;social conservatives&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/no-more-social-conservatives.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So clerical celibacy was not the problem?</title>
		<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/so-clerical-celibacy-was-not-the-problem.html</link>
		<comments>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/so-clerical-celibacy-was-not-the-problem.html#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 13:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Silk]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Jay Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Those on the Catholic left are not very happy that the <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/55745387/Causes-and-Context-of-Sexual-Abuse-Minors-by-US-Catholic-Priests-1950-201051211">Jay Report</a> declines in no uncertain terms to blame clerical celibacy for the sexual abuse crisis. As the report puts it:</p>
<p>Factors that remained consistent over this time period, such as celibacy, do not explain the sexual abuse "crisis." Celibacy has been constant in the Catholic Church since the eleventh century...
<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/so-clerical-celibacy-was-not-the-problem.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/so-clerical-celibacy-was-not-the-problem.html">So clerical celibacy was not the problem?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Those on the Catholic left are not very happy that the <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/55745387/Causes-and-Context-of-Sexual-Abuse-Minors-by-US-Catholic-Priests-1950-201051211" target="_blank">Jay Report</a> declines in no uncertain terms to blame clerical celibacy for the sexual abuse crisis. As the report puts it:

Factors that remained consistent over this time period, such as celibacy, do not explain the sexual abuse "crisis." Celibacy has been constant in the Catholic Church since the eleventh century...<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/so-clerical-celibacy-was-not-the-problem.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/so-clerical-celibacy-was-not-the-problem.html">So clerical celibacy was not the problem?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/so-clerical-celibacy-was-not-the-problem.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay priests are not the problem</title>
		<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/gay-priests-are-not-the-problem.html</link>
		<comments>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/gay-priests-are-not-the-problem.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 10:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Silk]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Donohue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mychal Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>That's the big news out of the John Jay College Final Report on the  sexual abuse of minors by Catholic priests, due out at 2 p.m. today,  according to David Gibson's <a href="http://www.religionnews.com/index.php?/rnstext/exclusive_no_easy_answers_to_catholic_abuse_scandal/">scoop</a> for RNS last night (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/18/us/18bishops.html?_r=1">followed swiftly</a> by NYT's Laurie Goodstein, who also scored a copy). To wit:<br />
[T]he researchers found no statistical...
<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/gay-priests-are-not-the-problem.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/gay-priests-are-not-the-problem.html">Gay priests are not the problem</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's the big news out of the John Jay College Final Report on the  sexual abuse of minors by Catholic priests, due out at 2 p.m. today,  according to David Gibson's <a href="http://www.religionnews.com/index.php?/rnstext/exclusive_no_easy_answers_to_catholic_abuse_scandal/" target="_blank">scoop</a> for RNS last night (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/18/us/18bishops.html?_r=1" target="_blank">followed swiftly</a> by NYT's Laurie Goodstein, who also scored a copy). To wit:
[T]he researchers found no statistical...<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/gay-priests-are-not-the-problem.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/gay-priests-are-not-the-problem.html">Gay priests are not the problem</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/gay-priests-are-not-the-problem.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bishops behaving badly</title>
		<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/bishops-behaving-badly.html</link>
		<comments>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/bishops-behaving-badly.html#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Silk]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Rigali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatican guidelines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No doubt about it, the Vatican's <a href="http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2011/05/on-abuse-cdf-circular.html">latest missive</a> has <a href="http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/gungrey/Article_2011-05-16-EU-Vatican-Church-Abuse/id-112ad89e3cbb49e0ba83c2a86d6210b1">laid an egg</a>.  Styled as an encyclical to assist national bishops conferences in  developing guidelines for dealing with clergy accused of sexual abuse,  the letter utterly ignores what everybody outside the Church hierarchy ...
<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/bishops-behaving-badly.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/bishops-behaving-badly.html">Bishops behaving badly</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[No doubt about it, the Vatican's <a href="http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2011/05/on-abuse-cdf-circular.html" target="_blank">latest missive</a> has <a href="http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/gungrey/Article_2011-05-16-EU-Vatican-Church-Abuse/id-112ad89e3cbb49e0ba83c2a86d6210b1" target="_blank">laid an egg</a>.  Styled as an encyclical to assist national bishops conferences in  developing guidelines for dealing with clergy accused of sexual abuse,  the letter utterly ignores what everybody outside the Church hierarchy ...<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/bishops-behaving-badly.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/bishops-behaving-badly.html">Bishops behaving badly</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/bishops-behaving-badly.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signs of the Times</title>
		<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/signs-of-the-times.html</link>
		<comments>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/signs-of-the-times.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 13:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Silk]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Republican Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Camping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that we have entered the final week of the <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/05/a_conversation_with_harold_cam.html">Harold Camping-certified</a> End Times, it behooves us to consider the signs. Here goes.</p>
<p>* Osama  (the false Antichrist) Bin Laden killed by Barack H.  (not the false Antichrist) Obama.</p>
<p>* Forces of Repression (viz. Gog and Magog) at work all over Middle East.</p>
<p>* House of Representatives kills off Medicare. (Who needs it?)</p>
<p>* Head of IMF (aka Root of all...
<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/signs-of-the-times.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/signs-of-the-times.html">Signs of the Times</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Now that we have entered the final week of the <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/05/a_conversation_with_harold_cam.html" target="_blank">Harold Camping-certified</a> End Times, it behooves us to consider the signs. Here goes.

* Osama  (the false Antichrist) Bin Laden killed by Barack H.  (not the false Antichrist) Obama.

* Forces of Repression (viz. Gog and Magog) at work all over Middle East.

* House of Representatives kills off Medicare. (Who needs it?)

* Head of IMF (aka Root of all...<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/signs-of-the-times.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/signs-of-the-times.html">Signs of the Times</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/signs-of-the-times.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Praying for Huckabee</title>
		<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/praying-for-huckabee.html</link>
		<comments>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/praying-for-huckabee.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 21:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Silk]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Republican Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It turns out that, in deciding whether he's going to tell Fox viewers  <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/huckabee-e-mail-once-i-pull-the-trigger-saturday-night-things-will-get-even-crazier.php?ref=fpb">tonight</a> that he's actually running for president in 1012, Mike Huckabee  is not only praying on it, but also <a href="http://www.prayforhuckabee.com/">asking us to</a> do the same. Which is pretty cool, when you think of it--and not just  because the Huck-a-Pray form will...
<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/praying-for-huckabee.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/praying-for-huckabee.html">Praying for Huckabee</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[It turns out that, in deciding whether he's going to tell Fox viewers  <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/huckabee-e-mail-once-i-pull-the-trigger-saturday-night-things-will-get-even-crazier.php?ref=fpb" target="_blank">tonight</a> that he's actually running for president in 1012, Mike Huckabee  is not only praying on it, but also <a href="http://www.prayforhuckabee.com/" target="_blank">asking us to</a> do the same. Which is pretty cool, when you think of it--and not just  because the Huck-a-Pray form will...<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/praying-for-huckabee.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/praying-for-huckabee.html">Praying for Huckabee</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/praying-for-huckabee.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does DOMA nix same-sex military weddings?</title>
		<link>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/does-doma-nix-same-sex-military-weddings.html</link>
		<comments>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/does-doma-nix-same-sex-military-weddings.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 14:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Silk]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/files/2011/05/Shepherd-of-the-Sea-SOS-Chapel.jpg"><img src="http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/files/2011/05/Shepherd-of-the-Sea-SOS-Chapel.jpg" width="300" height="225" /></a>Let's suppose that a gay submariner based in New London falls in love  with, oh, a local cop, and the two decide to get married. They go down  to the city <a...
<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/does-doma-nix-same-sex-military-weddings.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/does-doma-nix-same-sex-military-weddings.html">Does DOMA nix same-sex military weddings?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/files/2011/05/Shepherd-of-the-Sea-SOS-Chapel.jpg"><img src="http://blog.beliefnet.com/religionandpubliclife/files/2011/05/Shepherd-of-the-Sea-SOS-Chapel.jpg" width="300" height="225" /></a>Let's suppose that a gay submariner based in New London falls in love  with, oh, a local cop, and the two decide to get married. They go down  to the city <a...<p><a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/does-doma-nix-same-sex-military-weddings.html">Read the full post here &raquo;</a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/does-doma-nix-same-sex-military-weddings.html">Does DOMA nix same-sex military weddings?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife">Religion &amp; Public Life With Mark Silk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/religionandpubliclife/2011/05/does-doma-nix-same-sex-military-weddings.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
