Bingham Watch

Bingham rated as only '48% progressive' on 'Rate My Tory' website

2010-04-11T20:15:00.001+01:00

The Rate My Tory website has a 'progressive rating' for every Tory candidate in the upcoming General Election. To achieve this, it has given each candidate a score out of 5 for each of 10 categories. Andrew Bingham has his own page, and we'll display the scores below:

Climate Change - 3 out of 5

LGBT Rights - ? out of 5

Inheritance Tax - 2 out of 5

Hunting Ban - ? out of 5

Public Services - 3 out of 5

Abortion Law Amendment - ? out of 5

Immigration - 2 out of 5

Marriage - 2 out of 5

Human Rights Act - ? out of 5

House of Lords Reform - ? out of 5

Now you'll notice that many of the categories don't have a score, so it may be that Andrew is actually more progressive than it appears, but the site relies on 'crowd sourcing' and has no information in these areas. You can contribute and provide information at the bottom of Bingham's page on the site.

One more thing, this website is the work of Progress, a political organisation linked to the Labour Party, and Blairite at that - so their our claim to be progressive in any meaningful sense is, to say the least, tenuous. This is essentially one bunch of right-wingers criticising another. Nonetheless, it's an interesting and useful resource in our quest to paint a picture of Andrew Bingham.

The High Peak Conservative Association website - who is behind it?

2010-04-01T21:00:00.002+01:00

Here's something that's a bit puzzling. If you check who has registered the domain name for the High Peak Conservative Association website, you get the following details:

Domain name: hpca.co.uk

Registrant: Bridgewater House

Registrant type: Unknown

Registrant's address:

58 -60 Whitworth Street
Manchester
M1 6LT
United Kingdom

Now you might expect the registrant to be a private individual (in which case no details would appear), or the local Tory party, or perhaps even Central Office. But what we get is a building in Manchester that has a number of occupiers, and none of which have an obvious link to High Peak Conservatives.

We would be grateful for any information we receive about possible lines of inquiry. Of course, it may be entirely innocuous, in which case we'll be glad to set the record straight.

Bingham & Levitt trading blows on Ashcroft

2010-03-15T20:25:00.007Z

You may have noticed that not long after our last post appeared, the High Peak MP Tom Levitt issued his own press release* about the Ashcroft funding issue. Levitt waded in with his political size-nines accusing Ashcroft of funding High Peak Conservative Association (HPCA) to the tune of £110,000, and published a letter he had written to Andrew Bingham regarding the issue.

Levitt was relying on an article in the Independent Newspaper (not published online), but in his reply Andrew Bingham was quick to point out that £110,000 was the total income received by HPCA for 2 years, and not the amount received from Tory Central Office. That'll be Tom Levitt finding his size nines have had the laces tied together.

Other than that, there's little point in regurgitating the tit-for-tat, party political guff. But what is misleading is when Bingham states that HPCA has not received money directly from either Ashcroft or his companies, and that certain funding comes directly from central office - this is disingenuous because it's well known that Ashcroft's money lands in target constituencies in this way, as we outlined in our original post about this issue.

*when Levitt's website disappears, you can view a screen grab of this page here

Vote Bingham - get Ashcroft

2010-03-02T22:37:00.000Z

With yesterday's news that Tory Deputy Chairman Michael Ashcroft is a 'non-dom', there's been a certain amount of attention paid to the money he's pouring into local parliamentary campaigns. In areas such as Pendle, the local Conservative Association has been publishing and paying for the delivery of thousands of newsletters and leaflets to the electorate, with funds provided by Ashcroft to Tory Central Office. Even the local MP is struggling to compete with such publicity that Ashcroft's resources can bring.

The Guardian yesterday conducted a 'crowd-sourcing' experiment to find out exactly what was being delivered in the constituencies that had been identified by Ashcroft as key battlegrounds* in a report he prepared after the last election. High Peak was amongst them (though not amongst the report resulting from this experiment).

Now we know that High Peak Conservative Association (HPCA) delivered some very glossy publicity materials in the local elections last year, and also that their newsletter 'High Peak Matters' has been delivered too (Bingham even tried to use the fact that it had been paid for using the Post Office as a weapon against Tom Levitt during the row over his expenses and communications allowance last year).

Having done some sniffing around today, we've managed to find copies of the annual financial reports for HPCA for the following years: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 & 2008. The last two years show grants from Tory HQ to a total of £27,599. In 2007, the grant was £10,811, and HPCA spent £11,536 on printing and stationery, and £8,227 on postage in the same period (by way of contrast, in the previous year, they spent £3,273 on these items). In 2008, the grant was £16,788 and a new category 'Target Seat Campaign Funding' was added to the accounts, soaking up £15,968 of expenditure.

The accounts for 2009 are yet to be published, but it's clear that ultimately, if you vote for Bingham you're actually getting Ashcroft, and your vote has been bought by him.

* - opens PDF, see page 51.

Bingham & other Derbyshire Tory candidates 'unrepresentative' of East Midlands workforce say GMB Union

2010-01-31T13:28:00.000Z

A GMB press release has highlighted how Tory candidates in Derbyshire are 'wholly unrepresentative' of the areas they aim to represent. A GMB survey has found that the occupations of candidates in the East Midlands are drawn from only 15.8% of the workforce - i.e. managers and senior officials.

Bingham's occupation is listed rather vaguely as 'Industry', and his biography on the High Peak Conservatives website tells us the following:

He has worked in industry for most of his life supplying engineering equipment to companies across the High Peak and North West area

Looking at Bingham's register of interests as a Councillor on the High Peak Borough Council website, it's clear that Andrew now works full-time for the local Conservative Association.

The end result is that we seem to know very little about Bingham's past employment and business interests. Any light that can be shed on this is more than welcome.

Coming soon in 2010...

2009-12-31T00:18:00.002Z

A new website dedicated to keeping an eye on the Conservative Parliamentary Candidate for High Peak, Andrew Bingham. Andrew is highly likely to be the next MP for High Peak after the next General Election.

Who is he? What does he believe in? Who are his friends?

Join us as we take a closer look at Andrew nearer to the time of the election in 2010.