<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:blogger='http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2644329136138247969</id><updated>2024-11-01T11:52:57.063+00:00</updated><category term="funding"/><category term="michael ashcroft"/><category term="bridgewater house"/><category term="occupation"/><category term="reactionary"/><category term="unrepresentative"/><category term="website"/><title type='text'>Bingham Watch</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default?redirect=false'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>6</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2644329136138247969.post-3200339572415582406</id><published>2010-04-11T20:15:00.001+01:00</published><updated>2010-04-11T20:15:29.320+01:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="reactionary"/><title type='text'>Bingham rated as only &#39;48% progressive&#39; on &#39;Rate My Tory&#39; website</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://ratemytory.org.uk/&quot;&gt;Rate My Tory&lt;/a&gt; website has a &#39;progressive rating&#39; for every Tory candidate in the upcoming General Election. To achieve this, it has given each candidate a score out of 5 for each of 10 categories. &lt;a href=&quot;http://ratemytory.org.uk/tories-by-surname/andrew-bingham-ppc-high-peak/&quot;&gt;Andrew Bingham has his own page&lt;/a&gt;, and we&#39;ll display the scores below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Climate Change&lt;/i&gt; - &lt;b&gt;3 out of 5&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;LGBT Rights&lt;/i&gt; - ? out of 5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Inheritance Tax&lt;/i&gt; - &lt;b&gt;2 out of 5&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Hunting Ban&lt;/i&gt; - ? out of 5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Public Services&lt;/i&gt; - &lt;b&gt;3 out of 5&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Abortion Law Amendment&lt;/i&gt; - ? out of 5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Immigration&lt;/i&gt; - &lt;b&gt;2 out of 5&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Marriage&lt;/i&gt; - &lt;b&gt;2 out of 5&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Human Rights Act&lt;/i&gt; - ? out of 5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;House of Lords Reform&lt;/i&gt; - ? out of 5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Now you&#39;ll notice that many of the categories don&#39;t have a score, so it may be that Andrew is actually more progressive than it appears, but the site relies on &#39;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowd_sourcing&quot;&gt;crowd sourcing&lt;/a&gt;&#39; and has no information in these areas. You can contribute and provide information at the bottom of &lt;a href=&quot;http://ratemytory.org.uk/tories-by-surname/andrew-bingham-ppc-high-peak/&quot;&gt;Bingham&#39;s page&lt;/a&gt; on the site.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;One more thing, this website is the work of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressives.org.uk/&quot;&gt;Progress&lt;/a&gt;, a political organisation linked to the Labour Party, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blairite&quot;&gt;Blairite&lt;/a&gt; at that - so their our claim to be progressive in any meaningful sense is, to say the least, tenuous. &lt;b&gt;This is essentially one bunch of right-wingers criticising another&lt;/b&gt;. Nonetheless, it&#39;s an interesting and useful resource in our quest to paint a picture of Andrew Bingham.&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/3200339572415582406/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/04/bingham-rated-as-only-48-progressive-on.html#comment-form' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/3200339572415582406'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/3200339572415582406'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/04/bingham-rated-as-only-48-progressive-on.html' title='Bingham rated as only &#39;48% progressive&#39; on &#39;Rate My Tory&#39; website'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2644329136138247969.post-6459179831946201892</id><published>2010-04-01T21:00:00.002+01:00</published><updated>2010-04-01T21:00:30.140+01:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bridgewater house"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="website"/><title type='text'>The High Peak Conservative Association website - who is behind it?</title><content type='html'>Here&#39;s something that&#39;s a bit puzzling. If you check who has registered the domain name for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hpca.co.uk/&quot;&gt;High Peak Conservative Association website&lt;/a&gt;, you get the &lt;a href=&quot;http://webwhois.nic.uk/cgi-bin/whois.cgi?query=hpca.co.uk&amp;amp;WHOIS+Submit.x=0&amp;amp;WHOIS+Submit.y=0&quot;&gt;following details&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Domain name:&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;hpca.co.uk&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Registrant:&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Bridgewater House&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Registrant type:&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Unknown&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Registrant&#39;s address:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;58 -60 Whitworth Street&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Manchester&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;M1 6LT&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;United Kingdom&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now you might expect the registrant to be a private individual (in which case no details would appear), or the local Tory party, or perhaps even Central Office. But what we get is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&amp;amp;source=s_q&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;geocode=&amp;amp;q=M1+6LT&amp;amp;sll=53.800651,-4.064941&amp;amp;sspn=21.751462,67.631836&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;hq=&amp;amp;hnear=Manchester,+Lancashire+M1+6LT,+United+Kingdom&amp;amp;t=h&amp;amp;z=16&amp;amp;layer=c&amp;amp;cbll=53.475032,-2.240015&amp;amp;panoid=Eb_z6rjJh8eXgRwkhAE3ig&amp;amp;cbp=12,321.33,,0,-5.94&quot;&gt;building in Manchester&lt;/a&gt; that has a number of occupiers, and none of which have an obvious link to High Peak Conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be grateful for any information we receive about possible lines of inquiry. Of course, it may be entirely innocuous, in which case we&#39;ll be glad to set the record straight.</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/6459179831946201892/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/04/high-peak-conservative-association_01.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/6459179831946201892'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/6459179831946201892'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/04/high-peak-conservative-association_01.html' title='The High Peak Conservative Association website - who is behind it?'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2644329136138247969.post-7528477411785893098</id><published>2010-03-15T20:25:00.007+00:00</published><updated>2010-04-12T21:27:45.434+01:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="funding"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="michael ashcroft"/><title type='text'>Bingham &amp; Levitt trading blows on Ashcroft</title><content type='html'>&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgl955r-92Tle4dHqkarnn4DD1RT5lADWkqGKhNxFbTTzAE_ZFmPWQ0tk0dmqI5d2jH3MkXhnfPoR6Nn0Am8sjEXyU-iTd3ce7dPcGDwvjj1Ap7-gcxIYmmhqr-T7GR2jiP6G5-DHgrifkt/s1600/Andrew+Ashcroft.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;198&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgl955r-92Tle4dHqkarnn4DD1RT5lADWkqGKhNxFbTTzAE_ZFmPWQ0tk0dmqI5d2jH3MkXhnfPoR6Nn0Am8sjEXyU-iTd3ce7dPcGDwvjj1Ap7-gcxIYmmhqr-T7GR2jiP6G5-DHgrifkt/s400/Andrew+Ashcroft.png&quot; width=&quot;400&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;You may have noticed that not long &lt;a href=&quot;http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/vote-bingham-get-ashcroft.html&quot;&gt;after our last post&lt;/a&gt; appeared, the High Peak MP Tom Levitt &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomlevitt.org.uk/levitt-calls-on-bingham-to-return-ashcroft-cash-3-march-2010&quot;&gt;issued his own press release&lt;/a&gt;* about the Ashcroft funding issue. Levitt waded in with his political size-nines accusing Ashcroft of funding High Peak Conservative Association (HPCA) to the tune of &lt;b&gt;£110,000&lt;/b&gt;, and published a letter he had written to Andrew Bingham regarding the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levitt was relying on an article in the Independent Newspaper (not published online), but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hpca.co.uk/index.php?sectionid=3&amp;amp;pagenumber=364&quot;&gt;in his reply&lt;/a&gt; Andrew Bingham was quick to point out that £110,000 was the &lt;i&gt;total income&lt;/i&gt; received by HPCA for 2 years, and not the amount received from Tory Central Office. That&#39;ll be Tom Levitt finding his size nines have had the laces tied together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than that, there&#39;s little point in regurgitating the tit-for-tat, party political guff. But what is misleading is when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hpca.co.uk/index.php?sectionid=3&amp;amp;pagenumber=363&quot;&gt;Bingham states&lt;/a&gt; that HPCA has not received money directly from either Ashcroft or his companies, and that certain funding comes directly from central office - this is disingenuous because it&#39;s well known that Ashcroft&#39;s money lands in target constituencies in this way, &lt;a href=&quot;http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/vote-bingham-get-ashcroft.html&quot;&gt;as we outlined in our original post about this issue&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*when Levitt&#39;s website disappears, you can view a screen grab of this page &lt;a href=&quot;http://sites.google.com/site/andrewbinghammp/files/LevittcallsonBinghamtoreturnAshcroftcash%283March2010%29.png&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/7528477411785893098/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/bingham-levitt-trading-blows-on.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/7528477411785893098'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/7528477411785893098'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/bingham-levitt-trading-blows-on.html' title='Bingham &amp; Levitt trading blows on Ashcroft'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgl955r-92Tle4dHqkarnn4DD1RT5lADWkqGKhNxFbTTzAE_ZFmPWQ0tk0dmqI5d2jH3MkXhnfPoR6Nn0Am8sjEXyU-iTd3ce7dPcGDwvjj1Ap7-gcxIYmmhqr-T7GR2jiP6G5-DHgrifkt/s72-c/Andrew+Ashcroft.png" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2644329136138247969.post-5507118932400704476</id><published>2010-03-02T22:37:00.000+00:00</published><updated>2010-03-02T22:37:52.821+00:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="funding"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="michael ashcroft"/><title type='text'>Vote Bingham - get Ashcroft</title><content type='html'>With &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/01/lord-ashcroft-reveals-non-dom&quot;&gt;yesterday&#39;s news that Tory Deputy Chairman Michael Ashcroft is a &#39;non-dom&#39;&lt;/a&gt;, there&#39;s been a certain amount of attention paid to the money he&#39;s pouring into local parliamentary campaigns. In areas such as Pendle, the local Conservative Association has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/02/partyfunding-ashcroft&quot;&gt;publishing and paying for the delivery of thousands of newsletters and leaflets to the electorate&lt;/a&gt;, with funds provided by Ashcroft to Tory Central Office. Even the local MP is struggling to compete with such publicity that Ashcroft&#39;s resources can bring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Guardian yesterday conducted a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2010/mar/01/ashcroft&quot;&gt;&#39;crowd-sourcing&#39; experiment&lt;/a&gt; to find out exactly what was being delivered in the constituencies that had been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lordashcroft.com/pdf/GeneralElectionReport.pdf&quot;&gt;identified by Ashcroft&lt;/a&gt; as key battlegrounds* in a report he prepared after the last election. High Peak was amongst them (though &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2010/mar/02/tory-campaign-crowdsourcing&quot;&gt;not amongst the report&lt;/a&gt; resulting from this experiment).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we know that High Peak Conservative Association (HPCA) delivered some very glossy publicity materials in the local elections last year, and also that their newsletter &#39;High Peak Matters&#39; has been delivered too (Bingham even tried to use the fact that it had been paid for using the Post Office &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buxtonadvertiser.co.uk/news/MP39s-council-tax-blunder.5400337.jp&quot;&gt;as a weapon against Tom Levitt&lt;/a&gt; during the row over his expenses and communications allowance last year).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having done some sniffing around today, we&#39;ve managed to find copies of the annual financial reports for HPCA for the following years: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/electoral_commission_pdf_file/0006/19734/HighPeakCA_16812-12268__E__N__S__W__.PDF&quot;&gt;2004&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/46711/HIGHPEAKCONSERVATIVESSOA31-12-2005_20932-15433__E__N__S__W__.PDF&quot;&gt;2005&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://bureau-query.funnelback.co.uk/search/click.cgi?rank=1&amp;amp;collection=electoral-commission&amp;amp;component=0&amp;amp;docnum=20153&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.electoralcommission.org.uk%2F__data%2Fassets%2Felectoral_commission_pdf_file%2F0008%2F20510%2FHighPeakCA2006_25979-19336__E__N__S__W__.pdf&amp;amp;index_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.electoralcommission.org.uk%2F__data%2Fassets%2Felectoral_commission_pdf_file%2F0008%2F20510%2FHighPeakCA2006_25979-19336__E__N__S__W__.pdf&quot;&gt;2006&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/48888/Conservative-Party-High-Peak-Statement-of-Accounts-2007_29538-21983__E__N__S__W__.pdf&quot;&gt;2007&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://bureau-query.funnelback.co.uk/search/click.cgi?rank=3&amp;amp;collection=electoral-commission&amp;amp;component=0&amp;amp;docnum=31315&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.electoralcommission.org.uk%2F_media%2Fstatement-of-accounts%2F2009%2FConservative-High-Peak-SOA-2008.pdf&amp;amp;index_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.electoralcommission.org.uk%2F_media%2Fstatement-of-accounts%2F2009%2FConservative-High-Peak-SOA-2008.pdf&quot;&gt;2008&lt;/a&gt;. The last two years show grants from Tory HQ to a total of &lt;b&gt;£27,599&lt;/b&gt;. In 2007, the grant was &lt;b&gt;£10,811&lt;/b&gt;, and HPCA spent &lt;b&gt;£11,536&lt;/b&gt; on printing and stationery, and &lt;b&gt;£8,227&lt;/b&gt; on postage in the same period (by way of contrast, in the previous year, they spent &lt;b&gt;£3,273&lt;/b&gt; on these items). In 2008, the grant was &lt;b&gt;£16,788&lt;/b&gt; and a new category &lt;i&gt;&#39;Target Seat Campaign Funding&#39;&lt;/i&gt; was added to the accounts, soaking up &lt;b&gt;£15,968&lt;/b&gt; of expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The accounts for 2009 are yet to be published, but it&#39;s clear that ultimately, if you vote for Bingham you&#39;re &lt;b&gt;actually getting Ashcroft&lt;/b&gt;, and your vote has been bought by him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;* - opens PDF, see page 51&lt;/i&gt;.</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/5507118932400704476/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/vote-bingham-get-ashcroft.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/5507118932400704476'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/5507118932400704476'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/vote-bingham-get-ashcroft.html' title='Vote Bingham - get Ashcroft'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2644329136138247969.post-940097406720558793</id><published>2010-01-31T13:28:00.000+00:00</published><updated>2010-01-31T13:28:13.150+00:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="occupation"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unrepresentative"/><title type='text'>Bingham &amp; other Derbyshire Tory candidates &#39;unrepresentative&#39; of East Midlands workforce say GMB Union</title><content type='html'>A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gmb.org.uk/files/99481/FileName/Derbyshirefinal2.pdf&quot;&gt;GMB press release&lt;/a&gt; has highlighted how Tory candidates in Derbyshire are &#39;wholly unrepresentative&#39; of the areas they aim to represent. A GMB survey has found that the occupations of candidates in the East Midlands are drawn from only 15.8% of the workforce - i.e. managers and senior officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bingham&#39;s occupation is listed rather vaguely as &#39;Industry&#39;, and his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hpca.co.uk/index.php?sectionid=1&amp;amp;pagenumber=248&quot;&gt;biography&lt;/a&gt; on the High Peak Conservatives website tells us the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;He has worked in industry for most of his life supplying engineering equipment to companies across the High Peak and North West area&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Looking at Bingham&#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.highpeak.gov.uk/contact/profiles/binghamA_declare.asp&quot;&gt;register of interests&lt;/a&gt; as a Councillor on the High Peak Borough Council website, it&#39;s clear that Andrew now works full-time for the local Conservative Association.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The end result is that we seem to know very little about Bingham&#39;s past employment and business interests. Any light that can be shed on this is &lt;b&gt;more than welcome&lt;/b&gt;.</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/940097406720558793/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/01/bingham-other-derbyshire-tory.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/940097406720558793'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/940097406720558793'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2010/01/bingham-other-derbyshire-tory.html' title='Bingham &amp; other Derbyshire Tory candidates &#39;unrepresentative&#39; of East Midlands workforce say GMB Union'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2644329136138247969.post-2737030599790071281</id><published>2009-12-31T00:18:00.002+00:00</published><updated>2009-12-31T00:18:44.058+00:00</updated><title type='text'>Coming soon in 2010...</title><content type='html'>A new website dedicated to keeping an eye on the Conservative Parliamentary Candidate for High Peak, &lt;b&gt;Andrew Bingham&lt;/b&gt;. Andrew is highly likely to be the next MP for High Peak after the next General Election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Who is he? What does he believe in? Who are his friends?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Join us as we take a closer look at Andrew nearer to the time of the election in 2010.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/2737030599790071281'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2644329136138247969/posts/default/2737030599790071281'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://binghamwatch.blogspot.com/2009/12/coming-soon-in-2010_6044.html' title='Coming soon in 2010...'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>