<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bioethics.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bioethics.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bioethics.com</link>
	<description>Your global information source on bioethics news, issues, &#38; events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:07:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>How A.I. Killed Student Writing (and Revived It)</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102574</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; High school and college teachers are watching students write, in the classroom, in order to protect against the incursion of artificial intelligence. The New York Times heard from nearly 400 college and high school educators who responded to &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102574">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/pexels-jeshoots-218863-1024x683.jpg" alt="a picture of a laptop" class="wp-image-74023 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/30/us/ai-students-cheating-homework-classrooms.html">NYT</a>) &#8211; <em>High school and college teachers are watching students write, in the classroom, in order to protect against the incursion of artificial intelligence.</em></p>



<p>The New York Times heard from nearly 400 college and high school educators who responded to a callout about how generative A.I. is changing writing instruction. Almost all described a deep rethinking of how to teach writing — and whether it still matters, since A.I. has become a better writer than most students (and adults), they said.</p>



<p>Teachers are responding to a widespread challenge. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/30/us/ai-students-cheating-homework-classrooms.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Babies Are Bleeding to Death as Parents Reject a Vitamin Shot Given at Birth</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102572</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(ProPublica) &#8211; Their autopsies, which took place over the last several years, all came to the same conclusion: The deaths were caused, in whole or in part, by a rare but potentially fatal condition known as vitamin K deficiency bleeding. &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102572">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/raghavendra-v-konkathi-v9Idw3hqkb4-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="a close up of a syringe with liquid" class="wp-image-74258 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/more-parents-decline-vitamin-k-shot-newborns">ProPublica</a>) &#8211; Their autopsies, which took place over the last several years, all came to the same conclusion: The deaths were caused, in whole or in part, by a rare but potentially fatal condition known as vitamin K deficiency bleeding.</p>



<p>In almost every case, the babies’ deaths could have been prevented with a long-standard vitamin K shot. But across the country, families — first in smatterings, now in droves — are declining the single, inexpensive injection given at birth to newborns to help their blood clot.</p>



<p>Many of them are doing so out of a well-meaning but ill-informed abundance of caution. (<a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/more-parents-decline-vitamin-k-shot-newborns">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Character[dot]AI sued over chatbot that claims to be a real doctor with a license</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102570</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 23:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102570</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Ars Technica) &#8211; Pennsylvania has sued the maker of Character.AI, alleging that it violated state law by presenting an AI chatbot character as a licensed doctor. The lawsuit was filed in a state court by the Pennsylvania Department of State &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102570">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/hush-naidoo-jade-photography-yo01Z-9HQAw-unsplash-scaled-e1666212823828-1024x683.jpg" alt="black and white image of a stethoscope" class="wp-image-66163 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/hush-naidoo-jade-photography-yo01Z-9HQAw-unsplash-scaled-e1666212823828-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/hush-naidoo-jade-photography-yo01Z-9HQAw-unsplash-scaled-e1666212823828-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/hush-naidoo-jade-photography-yo01Z-9HQAw-unsplash-scaled-e1666212823828-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/hush-naidoo-jade-photography-yo01Z-9HQAw-unsplash-scaled-e1666212823828.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/character-ai-sued-over-chatbot-that-claims-to-be-a-real-doctor-with-a-license/">Ars Technica</a>) &#8211; Pennsylvania has sued the maker of Character.AI, alleging that it violated state law by presenting an AI chatbot character as a licensed doctor. The lawsuit was filed in a state court by the Pennsylvania Department of State and State Board of Medicine.</p>



<p>“The department’s investigation found that AI chatbot characters on Character.AI claimed to be licensed medical professionals, including psychiatrists, available to engage users in conversations about mental health symptoms,” Governor Josh Shapiro’s office said today in an announcement of the lawsuit. (<a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/character-ai-sued-over-chatbot-that-claims-to-be-a-real-doctor-with-a-license/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mifepristone as a Tool of Coercion</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102568</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 23:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(WSJ) &#8211; The Fifth Circuit’s order has a sound basis. Mifepristone—not to be confused with the Plan B morning-after pill, which is available over the counter—poses clinical risks and is a potential tool of coercion and abuse. Its distribution without &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102568">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="741" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/aaker-eNM04HRsVLU-unsplash-1024x741.jpg" alt="black and white image of a woman looking down" class="wp-image-75450 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.wsj.com/opinion/mifepristone-as-a-tool-of-coercion-a00edf87">WSJ</a>) &#8211; The Fifth Circuit’s order has a sound basis. Mifepristone—not to be confused with the Plan B morning-after pill, which is available over the counter—poses clinical risks and is a potential tool of coercion and abuse. Its distribution without safeguards heightens these dangers.</p>



<p>Deregulation of mifepristone began in 2016, when the agency allowed nonphysicians such as nurse practitioners to prescribe it and reduced the number of required in-person medical visits from three to one. In 2021 the FDA eliminated the requirement for in-person dispensing entirely, a temporary Covid move that was made permanent in 2023. (<a href="https://www.wsj.com/opinion/mifepristone-as-a-tool-of-coercion-a00edf87">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kennedy Starts a Push to Help Americans Quit Antidepressants</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102566</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 23:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mental Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; The health secretary has long complained that Americans overuse psychiatric medications. New policies he is introducing aim to change that. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday announced several initiatives intended to rein in the prescription of &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102566">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="790" height="410" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/pharma.jpg" alt="Unlabeled pill bottles in a pharmacy" class="wp-image-19181 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/pharma.jpg 790w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/pharma-300x155.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 790px) 100vw, 790px" /></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/04/science/rfk-antidepressants-ssris-hhs-maha.html">NYT</a>) &#8211; <em>The health secretary has long complained that Americans overuse psychiatric medications. New policies he is introducing aim to change that.</em></p>



<p>Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday announced several initiatives intended to rein in the prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most widely prescribed class of antidepressants, which he has described as exceptionally difficult to quit.</p>



<p>Mr. Kennedy has long signaled that reducing the use of psychiatric drugs would be an aim of his tenure, but Monday’s announcements were the first significant step in that direction. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/04/science/rfk-antidepressants-ssris-hhs-maha.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meta will use AI to analyze height and bone structure to identify if users are underage</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102564</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 23:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(TechCrunch) &#8211; Meta will start using AI to scan photos and videos for visual clues to see if a user is under 13 and should be removed from Facebook and Instagram, the company announced on Tuesday. These visual clues include &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102564">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/dima-solomin-WfcHl9YfTyQ-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="Meta logo" class="wp-image-95542 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/05/meta-will-use-ai-to-analyze-height-and-bone-structure-to-identify-if-users-are-underage/">TechCrunch</a>) &#8211; Meta will start using AI to scan photos and videos for visual clues to see if a user is under 13 and should be removed from Facebook and Instagram, the company announced on Tuesday. These visual clues include a person’s height or bone structure, it said.</p>



<p>“We want to be clear: this is not facial recognition,” Meta explained in its blog post. (<a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/05/meta-will-use-ai-to-analyze-height-and-bone-structure-to-identify-if-users-are-underage/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hantavirus cruise ship heads for Spain’s Canary Islands as officials race to trace victims’ contacts</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102561</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 23:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102561</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(CNN) &#8211; The hantavirus-hit cruise ship MV Hondius departed Cape Verde for Tenerife on Wednesday, as authorities rush to trace anyone who may have come into contact with the virus. The journey from the archipelago nation off Africa’s west coast &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102561">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="682" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/alonso-reyes-haZNHEV2WXQ-unsplash-1024x682.jpg" alt="a cruise ship at sunset" class="wp-image-102562 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/05/africa/cruise-ship-hantavirus-who-intl">CNN</a>) &#8211; The hantavirus-hit cruise ship MV Hondius departed Cape Verde for Tenerife on Wednesday, as authorities rush to trace anyone who may have come into contact with the virus.</p>



<p>The journey from the archipelago nation off Africa’s west coast to Spain’s Canary Islands is expected to take three and a half days, the Spanish Ministry of Health told CNN.</p>



<p>The ship’s departure came soon after three people were evacuated from the vessel. (<a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/05/africa/cruise-ship-hantavirus-who-intl">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rise of Emotional Surveillance</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102558</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 23:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment / Fellowships / Internships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(The Atlantic) &#8211; he bad news is that software now purports to glean insights into the depths and vagaries of human emotion using AI, and it is coming to watch you. If it isn’t already: Morphcast, for example, has licensed &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102558">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="1024" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/AdobeStock_111567599-1024x1024.jpeg" alt="Faces" class="wp-image-95313 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/2026/05/worker-surveillance-emotion-ai/687029/">The Atlantic</a>) &#8211; he bad news is that software now purports to glean insights into the depths and vagaries of human emotion using AI, and it is coming to watch you. If it isn’t already: Morphcast, for example, has licensed its technology to a mental-health app, a program that monitors schoolchildren’s attention, and McDonald’s, which launched a promotional campaign in Portugal that scanned app users’ faces and offered them personalized coupons based on their (supposed) mood. It is one of many, many such companies doing similar work—the industry term is <em>emotion AI</em> or sometimes <em>affective computing</em>. (<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/2026/05/worker-surveillance-emotion-ai/687029/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ChatGPT Wrestles With Its Most Chilling Conversation: How Do I Plan an Attack?</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102556</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 23:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(WSJ) &#8211; OpenAI’s chatbot dispenses advice on weapons and role-plays mass shootings. The carnage is raising scrutiny on when and how companies intervene. Last spring, Florida State University student Phoenix Ikner wanted to know how many classmates he needed to &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102556">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="684" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/pexels-cottonbro-studio-4069291-1024x684.jpg" alt="man sitting at a computer in the dark" class="wp-image-74024 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.wsj.com/us-news/chatgpt-mass-shooting-openai-78a436d1">WSJ</a>) &#8211; <em>OpenAI’s chatbot dispenses advice on weapons and role-plays mass shootings. The carnage is raising scrutiny on when and how companies intervene.</em></p>



<p>Last spring, Florida State University student Phoenix Ikner wanted to know how many classmates he needed to kill to become notorious.</p>



<p>ChatGPT responded with a metric. “Usually 3 or more dead, 5-6 total victims, pushes it onto national media,” the AI service told Ikner, who had spent the previous night describing to the chatbot how he was feeling depressed and suicidal, according to a transcript of the exchanges reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.</p>



<p>Then Ikner uploaded an image of a Glock handgun and ammunition and asked the chatbot how to use it. Was there a safety to switch off? ChatGPT told him there wasn’t: “If there’s a round in the chamber and you pull the trigger? It will fire.” (<a href="https://www.wsj.com/us-news/chatgpt-mass-shooting-openai-78a436d1">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102552</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; The Trump administration, which took a noninterventionist approach to artificial intelligence, is now discussing imposing oversight on A.I. models before they are made publicly available. President Trump, who promoted a hands-off approach to artificial intelligence and gave Silicon &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102552">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/rene-deanda-zfKlCKK-Ql0-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="Picture of the White House lawn" class="wp-image-77687 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/04/technology/trump-ai-models.html">NYT</a>) &#8211; <em>The Trump administration, which took a noninterventionist approach to artificial intelligence, is now discussing imposing oversight on A.I. models before they are made publicly available.</em></p>



<p>President Trump, who promoted a hands-off approach to artificial intelligence and gave Silicon Valley free rein to roll out the technology, is considering the introduction of government oversight over new A.I. models, according to U.S. officials and people briefed on the deliberations.</p>



<p>The administration is discussing an executive order to create an A.I. working group that would bring together tech executives and government officials to examine potential oversight procedures, according to U.S. officials, who declined to be identified in order to discuss deliberations over sensitive policies. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/04/technology/trump-ai-models.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>US healthcare marketplaces shared citizenship and race data with ad tech giants</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102550</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Tech Crunch) &#8211; Almost all of the 20 U.S. state government-run health insurance marketplaces shared residents’ application information with advertising and tech giants, including Google, LinkedIn, Meta, and Snap, according to a new investigation by Bloomberg. The report drives home &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102550">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img decoding="async" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AdobeStock_712264631.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-99298 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/04/us-healthcare-marketplaces-shared-citizenship-and-race-data-with-ad-tech-giants/">Tech Crunch</a>) &#8211; Almost all of the 20 U.S. state government-run health insurance marketplaces shared residents’ application information with advertising and tech giants, including Google, LinkedIn, Meta, and Snap, according to a new investigation by Bloomberg.</p>



<p>The report drives home the privacy problems created by pixel-sized trackers, which allow website owners to collect information about their visitors, often for web analytics and identifying bugs. (<a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/04/us-healthcare-marketplaces-shared-citizenship-and-race-data-with-ad-tech-giants/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Temporarily Restores Access to Abortion Pill by Mail</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102548</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; A lower-court ruling had reinstated a Food and Drug Administration requirement that patients visit a health care provider in person to obtain mifepristone. The Supreme Court on Monday restored nationwide access to a widely used abortion medication in &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102548">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="790" height="410" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/pharma.jpg" alt="Unlabeled pill bottles in a pharmacy" class="wp-image-19181 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/pharma.jpg 790w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/pharma-300x155.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 790px) 100vw, 790px" /></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/04/us/politics/supreme-court-abortion-pill.html">NYT</a>) &#8211; <em>A lower-court ruling had reinstated a Food and Drug Administration requirement that patients visit a health care provider in person to obtain mifepristone.</em></p>



<p>The Supreme Court on Monday restored nationwide access to a widely used abortion medication in a temporary order that will, for now, allow women to once again obtain the pill mifepristone by mail.</p>



<p>In a brief order, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. paused a lower-court ruling from Friday that had prevented abortion providers from prescribing the pills by telemedicine and shipping them to patients, causing confusion for providers and patients. The one-sentence order imposes a pause until at least May 11. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/04/us/politics/supreme-court-abortion-pill.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Is What Should Unite the Right and the Left on A.I.</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102544</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; We come from different parties and have guided artificial intelligence policy under very different presidents. But we agree: A.I. has become so powerful that, along with its tremendous promise, the technology poses immediate risks to national security. The &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102544">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389-1024x683.jpg" alt="Close up of a CPU" class="wp-image-69181 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/04/opinion/ai-national-security-risk-politics.html">NYT</a>) &#8211; We come from different parties and have guided artificial intelligence policy under very different presidents. But we agree: A.I. has become so powerful that, along with its tremendous promise, the technology poses immediate risks to national security. The United States is competing with authoritarian powers for control of A.I.’s future. Yet the country lacks a strong plan to protect the nation from A.I.’s profound dangers. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/04/opinion/ai-national-security-risk-politics.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102554</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatric]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Vox) – A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time. In a lab room, a toddler, deaf from birth, sits while a tone plays. There’s no reaction. His face does not change. Six weeks &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102554">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="724" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/thavis-3d-2GEr4fLZt8A-unsplash-scaled-e1689288298392-1024x724.jpg" alt="3D rendering of a DNA molecule" class="wp-image-71181 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/thavis-3d-2GEr4fLZt8A-unsplash-scaled-e1689288298392-1024x724.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/thavis-3d-2GEr4fLZt8A-unsplash-scaled-e1689288298392-300x212.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/thavis-3d-2GEr4fLZt8A-unsplash-scaled-e1689288298392-768x543.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/thavis-3d-2GEr4fLZt8A-unsplash-scaled-e1689288298392.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/487590/gene-therapy-crispr-deafness-food-and-drug-administration">Vox</a>) – <em>A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.</em></p>



<p>In a lab room, a toddler, deaf from birth, sits while a tone plays. There’s no reaction. His face does not change.</p>



<p>Six weeks later, after a single injection of an experimental gene therapy, the same toddler is back in the same room. The tone plays. The toddler’s head turns toward the sound. And somewhere just off screen, the child’s grandfather says his name. The boy turns and looks. He can hear. (<a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/487590/gene-therapy-crispr-deafness-food-and-drug-administration">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>



<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI finds signs of pancreatic cancer before tumors develop</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102546</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 22:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NBC News) &#8211; By the time doctors detect pancreatic cancer, it’s often too late to treat effectively. But a new study suggests that artificial intelligence might be able to find signs of the disease before tumors are visible on a &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102546">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="683" height="1024" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/pexels-anna-shvets-4226258-683x1024.jpg" alt="X-ray of a torso" class="wp-image-75772 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/health/cancer/ai-early-signs-pancreatic-cancer-before-tumors-develop-rcna343099">NBC News</a>) &#8211; By the time doctors detect pancreatic cancer, it’s often too late to treat effectively. But a new study suggests that artificial intelligence might be able to find signs of the disease before tumors are visible on a scan.</p>



<p>An AI model developed at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, detected abnormalities on patients’ CT scans up to three years before they were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, according to research published this week in the journal Gut. (<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/health/cancer/ai-early-signs-pancreatic-cancer-before-tumors-develop-rcna343099">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Married Adults Are Less Likely to Get Cancer Than Singles, Study Suggests</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102541</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 22:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(WSJ) &#8211; Support systems and spouses reminding partners to take care of themselves may contribute Marriage is linked to a lower risk of developing cancer, recent research found. A study of more than 4 million cancer cases in the U.S. &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102541">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/sandy-millar-YeJWDWeIZho-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="Rings on a dictionary page with the word marriage" class="wp-image-102542 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.wsj.com/health/healthcare/marriage-cancer-risk-study-a817ad72">WSJ</a>) &#8211;<em> Support systems and spouses reminding partners to take care of themselves may contribute</em></p>



<p>Marriage is linked to a lower risk of developing cancer, recent research found.</p>



<p>A study of more than 4 million cancer cases in the U.S. found that cancer rates were about 68% higher among men who have never married compared with those who have. For never-married women, the relationship was even more pronounced, with cancer rates roughly 83% higher, according to research published recently in the journal Cancer Research Communications. (<a href="https://www.wsj.com/health/healthcare/marriage-cancer-risk-study-a817ad72">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>In real-world test, an AI model did better than doctors at diagnosing patients</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102539</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 22:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NPR) &#8211; Researchers based at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center found that an AI reasoning model, developed by OpenAI, excelled at diagnosing patients and making decisions about managing their care. It matched and often outperformed doctors &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102539">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img decoding="async" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AdobeStock_712264631.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-99298 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/04/30/nx-s1-5804474/ai-doctors-openai-patient-care-diagnosis">NPR</a>) &#8211; Researchers based at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center found that an AI reasoning model, developed by OpenAI, excelled at diagnosing patients and making decisions about managing their care. It matched and often outperformed doctors and the earlier AI model, GPT-4. (<a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/04/30/nx-s1-5804474/ai-doctors-openai-patient-care-diagnosis">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UT Dallas class uses Minecraft to help students get into medical school</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102536</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 22:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(KERA News) &#8211; The class is Experiential Medical Reasoning, designed to help these students like 22 year old Sahar Bavandi pass the MCAT, the test needed for acceptance into medical school. Even though Bavandi had never played Minecraft before, she &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102536">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/maria-hoss-6eL_lMJDwjM-unsplash-1024x768.jpg" alt="close-up of a block-shaped person" class="wp-image-102537 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.keranews.org/education/2026-05-01/ut-dallas-class-minecraft-video-game-medical-school">KERA News</a>) &#8211; The class is Experiential Medical Reasoning, designed to help these students like 22 year old Sahar Bavandi pass the MCAT, the test needed for acceptance into medical school.</p>



<p>Even though Bavandi had never played Minecraft before, she adapted rapidly and likes it. She said the game has helped her visualize hospital settings, equipment and people that she would otherwise not be familiar with. (<a href="https://www.keranews.org/education/2026-05-01/ut-dallas-class-minecraft-video-game-medical-school">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delays in Visa Program Threaten Placement of Hundreds of Doctors in Underserved Areas</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102534</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 22:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(KFF Health News) &#8211; Hundreds of foreign doctors about to complete training in the U.S. will have to leave the country if the federal government doesn’t rapidly process their visa waiver applications, which have been languishing since the fall and &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102534">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="790" height="410" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/healthcare1.jpg" alt="A physician writing on a clipboard" class="wp-image-19166 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/healthcare1.jpg 790w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/healthcare1-300x155.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 790px) 100vw, 790px" /></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://kffhealthnews.org/health-industry/hhs-exchange-visitor-program-visa-waiver-j1-h1b-delays-foreign-doctors-deadline/">KFF Health News</a>) &#8211; Hundreds of foreign doctors about to complete training in the U.S. will have to leave the country if the federal government doesn’t rapidly process their visa waiver applications, which have been languishing since the fall and winter, immigration attorneys say.</p>



<p>The waiver program, run by the Department of Health and Human Services, allows physicians who aren’t U.S. citizens to stay in the country while transitioning from the visa they used during their training to temporary worker status. In exchange, the doctors agree to work in underserved areas for at least three years. (<a href="https://kffhealthnews.org/health-industry/hhs-exchange-visitor-program-visa-waiver-j1-h1b-delays-foreign-doctors-deadline/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>She Didn’t Want to Live With Advanced Dementia. So Why Was She Being Kept Alive?</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102532</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 22:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[End of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nursing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102532</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; Some consider the regular feeding of late-stage dementia patients to be nonnegotiable. Others see it as extending life unnecessarily. Within a few years of that, Ms. Lawson could utter only a string of unintelligible sounds and had lost &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102532">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/pexels-jsme-mila-16364308-1024x683.jpg" alt="A black and white photo of one person holding another's hand" class="wp-image-74320 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/30/well/late-stage-dementia-minimal-comfort-feeding-advance-directives.html?">NYT</a>) &#8211; <em>Some consider the regular feeding of late-stage dementia patients to be nonnegotiable. Others see it as extending life unnecessarily.</em></p>



<p>Within a few years of that, Ms. Lawson could utter only a string of unintelligible sounds and had lost the ability to feed herself.</p>



<p>To keep her alive, her care team fed her three times a day. Nurses held her head up and spooned meals into her mouth — eggs and sausages, chicken and vegetables — sometimes waking her to do so. They were providing the very care Ms. Lawson had administered decades earlier and hoped never to receive.</p>



<p>At times, she bowed her head and pushed herself away from the table. Her husband, Stan Lawson, and Ms. Hendrickson took these signs to mean she did not want to eat. It was painful for the family to watch her slowly deteriorate, and they didn’t like seeing her force-fed. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/30/well/late-stage-dementia-minimal-comfort-feeding-advance-directives.html?">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey—Spiritual Practices in a Digital Age: The Pursuit of Spiritual Fulfillment</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102526</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics_Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 15:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bioethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Volunteers Needed for ResearchAre you interested in reflecting on how your digital life connects with your spiritual practices? Faculty and Staff from LeTourneau University’s Faith, Science, and Technology Initiative and Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity are conducting a study &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102526">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pexels-darlene-alderson-4389462-1024x683.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-102527 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pexels-darlene-alderson-4389462-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pexels-darlene-alderson-4389462-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pexels-darlene-alderson-4389462-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pexels-darlene-alderson-4389462-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pexels-darlene-alderson-4389462-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pexels-darlene-alderson-4389462-604x403.jpg 604w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pexels-darlene-alderson-4389462-800x533.jpg 800w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pexels-darlene-alderson-4389462-1000x667.jpg 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>Volunteers Needed for Research<br />Are you interested in reflecting on how your digital life connects with your spiritual practices?</p>



<p>Faculty and Staff from LeTourneau University’s Faith, Science, and Technology Initiative and Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity are conducting a study exploring how digital practices intersect with spiritual life and how this contributes to a sense of spiritual fulfillment.</p>



<p><a href="https://www.cbhd.org/spiritual-practices-in-a-digital-age-sign-up">https://www.cbhd.org/spiritual-practices-in-a-digital-age-sign-up</a></p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>In real-world test, an AI model did better than ER doctors at diagnosing patients</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102408</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NPR) &#8211; Researchers based at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center found that an AI reasoning model, developed by OpenAI, excelled at diagnosing patients and making decisions about managing their care. It matched and often outperformed doctors &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102408">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="790" height="410" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/healthcare1.jpg" alt="A physician writing on a clipboard" class="wp-image-19166 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/healthcare1.jpg 790w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/healthcare1-300x155.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 790px) 100vw, 790px" /></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/04/30/nx-s1-5804474/ai-doctors-openai-patient-care-diagnosis">NPR</a>) &#8211; Researchers based at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center found that an AI reasoning model, developed by OpenAI, excelled at diagnosing patients and making decisions about managing their care. It matched and often outperformed doctors and the earlier AI model, GPT-4. (<a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/04/30/nx-s1-5804474/ai-doctors-openai-patient-care-diagnosis">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long a dream, it&#8217;s now real: a fast and accurate TB test that doesn&#8217;t need phlegm</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102406</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NPR) &#8211; &#8220;So for a long time, we have been trying to make the diagnosis of tuberculosis easier, cheaper, and quicker,&#8221; says Alfred Andama, a microbiologist at Makerere University College of Health Sciences in Uganda. That desire was fulfilled last &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102406">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="800" height="1024" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/cdc-iwkcspbMWx8-unsplash-800x1024.jpg" alt="illustration of rod-shaped bacteria" class="wp-image-75986 size-full"/></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/04/29/nx-s1-5802789/tb-tuberculosis-rapid-test">NPR</a>) &#8211; &#8220;So for a long time, we have been trying to make the diagnosis of tuberculosis easier, cheaper, and quicker,&#8221; says Alfred Andama, a microbiologist at Makerere University College of Health Sciences in Uganda.</p>



<p>That desire was fulfilled last year when the Chinese company Pluslife announced a new tuberculosis test called the MiniDock MTB. It works by taking a sample of someone&#8217;s phlegm or — if the patient is unable to produce phlegm — a mere tongue swab, heating and spinning it down, and then machine scanning it for DNA from the TB bacteria. It&#8217;s faster than conventional tests and is portable, allowing health workers to use it in a wider variety of settings. (<a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/04/29/nx-s1-5802789/tb-tuberculosis-rapid-test">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How AI May Reshape Humanitarian Decisions About Refugees</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102404</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Undark) &#8211; AI-driven tools are being tested in systems for granting asylum to refugees and aiding displaced populations. For people seeking asylum, the process usually involves registration, an interview, and review by government caseworkers. Decisions on granting asylum have traditionally &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102404">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/timon-studler-ABGaVhJxwDQ-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="aerial view of a crowd of people" class="wp-image-72030 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/timon-studler-ABGaVhJxwDQ-unsplash-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/timon-studler-ABGaVhJxwDQ-unsplash-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/timon-studler-ABGaVhJxwDQ-unsplash-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/timon-studler-ABGaVhJxwDQ-unsplash-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/timon-studler-ABGaVhJxwDQ-unsplash-2048x1365.jpg 2048w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://undark.org/2026/04/30/opinion-ai-humanitarian-decisions/">Undark</a>) &#8211; <em>AI-driven tools are being tested in systems for granting asylum to refugees and aiding displaced populations.</em></p>



<p>For people seeking asylum, the process usually involves registration, an interview, and review by government caseworkers. Decisions on granting asylum have traditionally been made by human officials, who may rely on forms, guidance, and other assessment frameworks. Those tools remain within a human-led process.</p>



<p>Now, the systems that assess need, verify identity, and decide what appears urgent are beginning to use artificial intelligence. (<a href="https://undark.org/2026/04/30/opinion-ai-humanitarian-decisions/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ‘Wonder Drug’ Hiding in Plain Sight</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/102398</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=102398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Women&#8217;s Health) &#8211; Women with [hyperemesis gravidarum] are often treated with the same drugs used for morning sickness, like Zofran, Diclegis, and Compazine, but for many, these drugs don’t put a meaningful dent in their symptoms. (I tried every medication &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/102398">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/freestocks-ux53SGpRAHU-unsplash-scaled-e1678315052640-1024x683.jpg" alt="picture of a pregnant woman's baby bump" class="wp-image-68797 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/freestocks-ux53SGpRAHU-unsplash-scaled-e1678315052640-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/freestocks-ux53SGpRAHU-unsplash-scaled-e1678315052640-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/freestocks-ux53SGpRAHU-unsplash-scaled-e1678315052640-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/freestocks-ux53SGpRAHU-unsplash-scaled-e1678315052640.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p>(<a href="https://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/a70977711/metformin-hyperemesis-gravidarum-longevity-health/">Women&#8217;s Health</a>) &#8211; Women with [hyperemesis gravidarum] are often treated with the same drugs used for morning sickness, like Zofran, Diclegis, and Compazine, but for many, these drugs don’t put a meaningful dent in their symptoms. (I tried every medication I was offered. Nothing helped.) But now, there’s new hope on the horizon for HG sufferers, and it’s coming in the form of metformin, a 100-year-old drug used mainly to treat type 2 diabetes in the U.S. (<a href="https://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/a70977711/metformin-hyperemesis-gravidarum-longevity-health/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
