<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bioethics.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bioethics.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bioethics.com</link>
	<description>Your global information source on bioethics news, issues, &#38; events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Jehovah’s Witnesses allow blood-derived products but keep ban on whole-blood transfusions</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104266</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(AP) &#8211; The Jehovah’s Witnesses have partly eased their longstanding prohibition on the medical use of donated blood, allowing members to receive products derived from blood but maintaining a ban on transfusions of whole blood. The policy, announced Friday, is &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104266">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/nguy-n-hi-p-maYeMl3xCrY-unsplash-scaled-e1691618131574.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="577" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/nguy-n-hi-p-maYeMl3xCrY-unsplash-scaled-e1691618131574-1024x577.jpg" alt="person given blood" class="wp-image-71619 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/nguy-n-hi-p-maYeMl3xCrY-unsplash-scaled-e1691618131574-1024x577.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/nguy-n-hi-p-maYeMl3xCrY-unsplash-scaled-e1691618131574-300x169.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/nguy-n-hi-p-maYeMl3xCrY-unsplash-scaled-e1691618131574-768x433.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/nguy-n-hi-p-maYeMl3xCrY-unsplash-scaled-e1691618131574.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://apnews.com/article/jehovahs-witnesses-donated-blood-transfusions-plasma-13fbe733e0039109efa728f65c7e4fda">AP</a>) &#8211; The Jehovah’s Witnesses have partly eased their longstanding prohibition on the medical use of donated blood, allowing members to receive products derived from blood but maintaining a ban on transfusions of whole blood.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The policy, announced Friday, is the second revision this year in what has long been one of the most controversial and distinctive teachings of the religious organization. (<a href="https://apnews.com/article/jehovahs-witnesses-donated-blood-transfusions-plasma-13fbe733e0039109efa728f65c7e4fda">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Timnit Gebru Believes There Is No ‘Existential Threat’ From AI</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104264</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Wired) &#8211; One of AI’s fiercest critics believes the doom talk is about founders making money, not saving humanity. The AI debate is no longer just about the technology itself, but about ideological groups and strategic narratives, and Gebru believes &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104264">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653.jpeg"><img decoding="async" width="427" height="1024" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-427x1024.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-104233 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-427x1024.jpeg 427w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-125x300.jpeg 125w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-768x1843.jpeg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-640x1536.jpeg 640w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-853x2048.jpeg 853w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-604x1450.jpeg 604w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-800x1920.jpeg 800w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-1000x2400.jpeg 1000w" sizes="(max-width: 427px) 100vw, 427px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-big-interview-podcast-timnit-gebru/">Wired</a>) &#8211; <em>One of AI’s fiercest critics believes the doom talk is about founders making money, not saving humanity.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI debate is no longer just about the technology itself, but about ideological groups and strategic narratives, and Gebru believes these narratives are a “harmful distraction” from the real issues with AI. I recently spoke with Gebru about what she believes these arguments are distracting from, and also got her response to critiques that her earlier research underestimates the AI of today. (<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-big-interview-podcast-timnit-gebru/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Deliberately Bet Like a Problem Gambler. Draft Kings Made Me a VIP</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104262</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(ProPublica) &#8211; “Take a loss? Now take a beat,” it read. This felt right after the tear I’d been on. To date I’d blown about $12,500 in total on DraftKings. That’s the equivalent of six months of mortgage payments in &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104262">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/rupixen-Q59HmzK38eQ-unsplash-e1741132023320.jpg"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/rupixen-Q59HmzK38eQ-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="Person with credit card and laptop" class="wp-image-96575 size-full"/></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/draftkings-sports-gambling-problem-vip-fanduel">ProPublica</a>) &#8211; “Take a loss? Now take a beat,” it read. This felt right after the tear I’d been on. To date I’d blown about $12,500 in total on DraftKings. That’s the equivalent of six months of mortgage payments in as many weeks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I followed the prompt to the site’s “responsible gaming” center, where I opted to limit myself to just two hours per day on the app and barred myself from depositing more than $100 in a 24-hour period. That pause is an essential part of DraftKings’ seemingly paradoxical business model — to make as much money as possible from the nation’s growing ranks of sports bettors without encouraging gambling addiction. The company says these limits are a cornerstone of that strategy.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet 30 minutes later, the company pushed me in the other direction. My phone buzzed with the first of four promotional alerts that day. Betting opportunities, they said, were waiting. (<a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/draftkings-sports-gambling-problem-vip-fanduel">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being a Doctor Will Never Be the Same After A.I.</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104260</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-Ed]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104260</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; I have a confession: A.I. is making me a better doctor. And I worry that it’s making doctors-in-training worse. Amid our recent doom cycle about whether A.I. will lead to extreme societal harms, a parallel anxiety has taken &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104260">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AdobeStock_712264631.jpeg"><img decoding="async" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AdobeStock_712264631.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-99298 size-full"/></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/25/opinion/ai-doctor-medical-students.html">NYT</a>) &#8211; I have a confession: A.I. is making me a better doctor. And I worry that it’s making doctors-in-training worse.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Amid our recent doom cycle about whether A.I. will lead to extreme societal harms, a parallel anxiety has taken hold in medicine about whether A.I. will one day replace physicians. In the context of that panic, I feel a little sheepish admitting that I already use the technology in my practice all the time — especially since I harbor anxieties about what its availability means for my students and residents, and therefore for the profession at large. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/25/opinion/ai-doctor-medical-students.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World Forgot About Ebola. The Organization Fighting It Has Never Been More Worried</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104258</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disaster Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Wired) &#8211; The Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo is on track to be the largest ever. Ebola hasn’t gone away. In fact, the ongoing outbreak in Africa is among the most concerning epidemics the organization trying to &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104258">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-W5VSXQ45ns-unsplash.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="773" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-W5VSXQ45ns-unsplash-1024x773.jpg" alt="Ebola Virus Creative artwork featuring a scanning electron micrograph of a single filamentous Ebola virus particle (colorized yellow and orange) in the foreground, and a second scanning electron micrograph of filamentous Ebola virus particles (red) budding from a chronically infected VERO E6 cells in the background." class="wp-image-103694 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-W5VSXQ45ns-unsplash-1024x773.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-W5VSXQ45ns-unsplash-300x226.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-W5VSXQ45ns-unsplash-768x580.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-W5VSXQ45ns-unsplash-1536x1159.jpg 1536w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-W5VSXQ45ns-unsplash-2048x1546.jpg 2048w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-W5VSXQ45ns-unsplash-604x456.jpg 604w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-W5VSXQ45ns-unsplash-800x604.jpg 800w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-W5VSXQ45ns-unsplash-1000x755.jpg 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/organization-fighting-ebola-never-more-worried/">Wired</a>) &#8211; <em>The Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo is on track to be the largest ever.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ebola hasn’t gone away. In fact, the ongoing outbreak in Africa is among the most concerning epidemics the organization trying to tame it has ever seen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Other than Covid, which affected the whole world, this is the thing that has frightened me the most,” says Nicole Lurie, who has worked for Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations since 2017 and now serves as executive director for preparedness and response and the US director.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More than 7,000 people have contracted the Bundibugyo Ebola virus in the Democratic Republic of Congo since May, around half of whom have died, according to government data compiled by the World Health Organization. (<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/organization-fighting-ebola-never-more-worried/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why this island paradise has the world&#8217;s fastest-growing HIV epidemic</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104256</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Covid-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NPR) &#8211; At the July AIDS 2026 conference in Rio, Jason Mitchell, a public health specialist leading Fiji&#8217;s HIV response, described it as the fastest-growing HIV epidemic in the world, noting that two-thirds of cases are in those ages 20-34. &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104256">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-cancer-institute-cI8T6zeDbZw-unsplash.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-cancer-institute-cI8T6zeDbZw-unsplash-1024x768.jpg" alt="HIV, the AIDS virus (yellow), infecting a human cell" class="wp-image-103667 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-cancer-institute-cI8T6zeDbZw-unsplash-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-cancer-institute-cI8T6zeDbZw-unsplash-300x225.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-cancer-institute-cI8T6zeDbZw-unsplash-768x576.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-cancer-institute-cI8T6zeDbZw-unsplash-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-cancer-institute-cI8T6zeDbZw-unsplash-2048x1536.jpg 2048w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-cancer-institute-cI8T6zeDbZw-unsplash-604x453.jpg 604w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-cancer-institute-cI8T6zeDbZw-unsplash-800x600.jpg 800w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/national-cancer-institute-cI8T6zeDbZw-unsplash-1000x750.jpg 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/09/26/g-s1-144667/hiv-crystal-meth-epidemic-fiji">NPR</a>) &#8211; At the July AIDS 2026 conference in Rio, Jason Mitchell, a public health specialist leading Fiji&#8217;s HIV response, described it as the fastest-growing HIV epidemic in the world, noting that two-thirds of cases are in those ages 20-34. &#8220;Our young, active, productive population is currently being infected with HIV, and unless we find solutions quickly, this will continue to get worse,&#8221; he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A key cause is another parallel epidemic — the rampant use of crystal meth among the nation&#8217;s youth, who often inject it. That has led to transmission through shared needles. (<a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/09/26/g-s1-144667/hiv-crystal-meth-epidemic-fiji">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alexa, I Need Some Space</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104248</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; Our cozy relationship with A.I. chatbots can lead to “artificial intimacy,” says one expert. Here’s how to keep it in check. Dr. Turkle, author of best-selling books such as “Reclaiming Conversation,” has studied the social and psychological implications &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104248">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971-1024x683.jpg" alt="a robotic hand touching a human hand" class="wp-image-68708 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/25/well/ai-chatbots-artificial-intimacy.html">NYT</a>) &#8211; <em>Our cozy relationship with A.I. chatbots can lead to “artificial intimacy,” says one expert. Here’s how to keep it in check.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dr. Turkle, author of best-selling books such as “Reclaiming Conversation,” has studied the social and psychological implications of artificial intelligence for more than four decades. She calls this rapidly emerging chatbot culture in which we use large language models, or L.L.M.s, such as Claude or ChatGPT for emotional connection, “Artificial Intimacy” — it’s the title of her new book out next week.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While A.I. “is a marvel,” she said, when it comes to chatbots, she suggests establishing “sacred spaces” — places in our lives that need to be protected from it. Here are three she and other experts recommended. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/25/well/ai-chatbots-artificial-intimacy.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Young organs may not be a fountain of youth for recipients</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104246</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organ Donation / Transplantation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(MIT Technology Review) &#8211; New studies pour cold water on a prominent rejuvenation idea. Unfortunately for Putin, new research pours a little cold water on this idea. Studies on transplanted hearts in both mice and humans suggest that new hearts &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104246">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/robina-weermeijer-z8_-Fmfz06c-unsplash.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/robina-weermeijer-z8_-Fmfz06c-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-98119 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/robina-weermeijer-z8_-Fmfz06c-unsplash-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/robina-weermeijer-z8_-Fmfz06c-unsplash-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/robina-weermeijer-z8_-Fmfz06c-unsplash-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/robina-weermeijer-z8_-Fmfz06c-unsplash-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/robina-weermeijer-z8_-Fmfz06c-unsplash-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/robina-weermeijer-z8_-Fmfz06c-unsplash-604x403.jpg 604w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/robina-weermeijer-z8_-Fmfz06c-unsplash-800x533.jpg 800w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/robina-weermeijer-z8_-Fmfz06c-unsplash-1000x667.jpg 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/09/25/1145083/young-organs-may-not-be-a-fountain-of-youth-for-recipients/">MIT Technology Review</a>) &#8211; <em>New studies pour cold water on a prominent rejuvenation idea.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately for Putin, new research pours a little cold water on this idea. Studies on transplanted hearts in both mice and humans suggest that new hearts soon adopt the biological age of the recipient, no matter how young they were to begin with. The finding could be important for transplantation, but it also highlights just how complex aging—and rejuvenation—are. (<a href="https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/09/25/1145083/young-organs-may-not-be-a-fountain-of-youth-for-recipients/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Scientists Contained a Threat That Could Have Destroyed Humanity</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104243</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; A half-century ago, scientists and lawyers agreed to strict self-regulation in DNA research to avoid catastrophe. Can A.I. follow the same model? It was 51 years ago, and 150 people assembled in the chapel at Asilomar, a rustic &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104243">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/wonderlane-tyVuimFK7j0-unsplash-e1790640412371.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="681" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/wonderlane-tyVuimFK7j0-unsplash-1024x681.jpg" alt="Asilomar Conference Center in California" class="wp-image-104244 size-full"/></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/23/us/asilomar-dna-ai-self-regulation-laws.html">NYT</a>) &#8211; <em>A half-century ago, scientists and lawyers agreed to strict self-regulation in DNA research to avoid catastrophe. Can A.I. follow the same model?</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It was 51 years ago, and 150 people assembled in the chapel at Asilomar, a rustic conference center on the Monterey Peninsula in California, to address the dangers of recombinant DNA, a discovery only a few years old. Scientists for the first time could combine bits of DNA from different organisms, creating new hybrids that could potentially cure diseases, but that might also unleash virulent new ones.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In that case, scientists did pause and come together to self-regulate how they could safely proceed. The group included the nation’s leading biologists, but also lawyers. The rules that they created did not shut down innovation. Instead, they created the biotechnology industry as we know it. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/23/us/asilomar-dna-ai-self-regulation-laws.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dengue fever cases near 200 across Tampa Bay: See latest county-by-county numbers</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104241</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Tampa Bay News) &#8211; Florida has confirmed 190 cases of dengue fever, with the majority reported in a single Tampa Bay-area county. The Florida Department of Health has released its latest confirmed cases of dengue fever, a mosquito-borne illness transmitted &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104241">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pexels-pixabay-86722-scaled-e1681421100445.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="678" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pexels-pixabay-86722-scaled-e1681421100445-1024x678.jpg" alt="A close up of a black and white mosquito." class="wp-image-69538 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pexels-pixabay-86722-scaled-e1681421100445-1024x678.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pexels-pixabay-86722-scaled-e1681421100445-300x199.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pexels-pixabay-86722-scaled-e1681421100445-768x509.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pexels-pixabay-86722-scaled-e1681421100445.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.wtsp.com/article/news/health/dengue-fever-cases-200-tampa-bay-numbers-health-mosquitos/67-bcbe1e62-4e28-4bd1-bbdb-5c4c12e9c603">Tampa Bay News</a>) &#8211; <em>Florida has confirmed 190 cases of dengue fever, with the majority reported in a single Tampa Bay-area county.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Florida Department of Health has released its latest confirmed cases of dengue fever, a mosquito-borne illness transmitted by the bite of an Aedes mosquito.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to the latest data, there have been 190 confirmed locally acquired dengue cases in Florida in 2026, most of which were reported in the Tampa Bay area between July 19 and Sept. 24. (<a href="https://www.wtsp.com/article/news/health/dengue-fever-cases-200-tampa-bay-numbers-health-mosquitos/67-bcbe1e62-4e28-4bd1-bbdb-5c4c12e9c603">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From weeks to hours &#8211; the rapid new test transforming brain tumour diagnosis</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104239</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(BBC) &#8211; A rapid new test for brain tumours that the NHS has started using can slash the time it takes for an accurate diagnosis from up to eight weeks to two hours. The test, which is used by doctors &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104239">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image_adobe_express.jpeg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="572" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image_adobe_express-1024x572.jpeg" alt="CGI of an RNA molecule" class="wp-image-66716 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image_adobe_express-1024x572.jpeg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image_adobe_express-300x168.jpeg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image_adobe_express-768x429.jpeg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image_adobe_express.jpeg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr3wj04d88ywo">BBC</a>) &#8211; A rapid new test for brain tumours that the NHS has started using can slash the time it takes for an accurate diagnosis from up to eight weeks to two hours.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The test, which is used by doctors to diagnose which type of tumour a patient has, should mean patients can start treatment including radiotherapy and chemotherapy sooner, and are spared weeks of uncertainty. (<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr3wj04d88ywo">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicotine Is Mounting a Comeback in the Wellness Movement</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104237</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 23:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Wired) &#8211; An ironic development emerging alongside the “Make America Healthy Again” movement is the portrayal of nicotine as a wellness and performance-enhancing product. Across social media, podcasts, natural medicine communities, and tech startups, prominent wellness personalities and other influencers &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104237">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/swenico-gUkaiV8Ld4A-unsplash-e1767213021619.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/swenico-gUkaiV8Ld4A-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="Man holding a can of nicotine pouches" class="wp-image-101005 size-full"/></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/nicotine-is-mounting-a-comeback-in-the-wellness-movement/">Wired</a>) &#8211; An ironic development emerging alongside the “Make America Healthy Again” movement is the portrayal of nicotine as a wellness and performance-enhancing product. Across social media, podcasts, natural medicine communities, and tech startups, prominent wellness personalities and other influencers are portraying nicotine as a misunderstood compound whose potential benefits have been overshadowed by its negative association with cigarettes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In these circles, nicotine is now being hailed as a natural product that can be used for everything from improving focus to protecting against cognitive decline. As a pulmonary physician-scientist who studies nicotine addiction and the health consequences of tobacco and nicotine products, I am concerned about these claims. (<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/nicotine-is-mounting-a-comeback-in-the-wellness-movement/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alcohol is Canada’s biggest drug problem. So why aren’t people getting help?</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104235</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 23:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mental Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(CBC) &#8211; The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) says around nine people die in Canadian hospitals each day from harm caused by alcohol. Daily hospitalizations for alcohol number 280, compared to 84 for opioids, it says.  On top of &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104235">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/li-zhang-FQjwn7z-U1o-unsplash-scaled-e1696892872710.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/li-zhang-FQjwn7z-U1o-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="several bottles of liquor" class="wp-image-72726 size-full"/></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/alcohol-use-disorder-9.7357272">CBC</a>) &#8211; The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) says around nine people die in Canadian hospitals each day from harm caused by alcohol. Daily hospitalizations for alcohol number 280, compared to 84 for opioids, it says. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On top of that, nearly 18 per cent of people aged 15 years or older in Canada will meet the clinical criteria for an alcohol-use disorder in their lifetime. Still, some doctors and other advocates say people struggling with alcohol aren’t getting treatment options that are backed by science. (<a href="https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/alcohol-use-disorder-9.7357272">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenAI Scraps Release of New AI Model Over Safety Concerns</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104232</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 22:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104232</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(WSJ) – Model dubbed GPT-6.1 Astra was due to make its debut inside ChatGPT and Codex in October OpenAI is scrapping the release of its next-generation AI model over safety concerns that researchers raised during internal testing, in one of &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104232">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653.jpeg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="427" height="1024" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-427x1024.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-104233 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-427x1024.jpeg 427w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-125x300.jpeg 125w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-768x1843.jpeg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-640x1536.jpeg 640w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-853x2048.jpeg 853w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-604x1450.jpeg 604w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-800x1920.jpeg 800w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AdobeStock_2201194653-1000x2400.jpeg 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 427px) 100vw, 427px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-chatgpt-model-release-cancel-safety-5a2f9f42">WSJ</a>) – <em>Model dubbed GPT-6.1 Astra was due to make its debut inside ChatGPT and Codex in October</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI is scrapping the release of its next-generation AI model over safety concerns that researchers raised during internal testing, in one of the clearest signs so far that agent misbehavior could stymie the industry’s rapid progression.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The move follows a summer punctuated by reports of AI systems industrywide going rogue, and marks a rare case of a major AI developer ditching a new release because of safety concerns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company had planned to launch the model, known as GPT-6.1 Astra, in the coming days or weeks, aiming for an October debut. The model was more capable than the company’s previous models in completing challenging tasks from end-to-end without human assistance, as well as writing. (<a href="https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-chatgpt-model-release-cancel-safety-5a2f9f42">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ChatGPT Helped Tumbler Ridge Shooter Focus on Guns, Tactics, and Terror</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104230</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104230</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Mother Jones) &#8211; OpenAI’s chatbot fed the school shooter’s violent fantasies and planning up to the massacre, our investigation reveals. In June 2025, Jesse Van Rootselaar received an email notification from OpenAI. Van Rootselaar had been using ChatGPT to discuss &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104230">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/aerps-com-5Gv-6g_lu-Y-unsplash.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="683" height="1024" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/aerps-com-5Gv-6g_lu-Y-unsplash-683x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-103688 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/aerps-com-5Gv-6g_lu-Y-unsplash-683x1024.jpg 683w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/aerps-com-5Gv-6g_lu-Y-unsplash-200x300.jpg 200w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/aerps-com-5Gv-6g_lu-Y-unsplash-768x1152.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/aerps-com-5Gv-6g_lu-Y-unsplash-1024x1536.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/aerps-com-5Gv-6g_lu-Y-unsplash-1365x2048.jpg 1365w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/aerps-com-5Gv-6g_lu-Y-unsplash-604x906.jpg 604w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/aerps-com-5Gv-6g_lu-Y-unsplash-800x1200.jpg 800w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/aerps-com-5Gv-6g_lu-Y-unsplash-1000x1500.jpg 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.motherjones.com/media/2026/09/chatgpt-tumbler-ridge-mass-shooter-openai/">Mother Jones</a>) &#8211; <em>OpenAI’s chatbot fed the school shooter’s violent fantasies and planning up to the massacre, our investigation reveals.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In June 2025, Jesse Van Rootselaar received an email notification from OpenAI. Van Rootselaar had been using ChatGPT to discuss committing potential acts of violence—including a mass shooting at a shopping mall—and now OpenAI had banned that account. But the troubled teen living in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, was not deterred and soon logged back on with a second account.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What happened next was astonishing: Van Rootselaar told ChatGPT about the account ban, noting she had specified “a famous real-world mall as the target” and herself as the perpetrator, but also claiming the scenario hadn’t been real. In response, ChatGPT explained why such violent content would be flagged—and then offered tips on how to evade its own safeguards. It advised Van Rootselaar to always frame her content as fictional or hypothetical in order to “never get flagged again” by OpenAI’s moderation systems. (<a href="https://www.motherjones.com/media/2026/09/chatgpt-tumbler-ridge-mass-shooter-openai/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What GLP-1 users should know about the potential risk of a rare type of vision loss</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104228</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104228</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(ABC News) &#8211; Dozens of Americans have filed personal injury lawsuits against the makers of popular GLP-1 drugs, like Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro, claiming they were not properly warned of the risk of a rare type of sudden vision loss, &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104228">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ion-fet-QRawWgV6gmo-unsplash-scaled-e1694638803804.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ion-fet-QRawWgV6gmo-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="Close up of an eye." class="wp-image-72254 size-full"/></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://abcnews.com/US/glp-1-users-potential-risk-rare-type-vision/story?id=136635318">ABC News</a>) &#8211; Dozens of Americans have filed personal injury lawsuits against the makers of popular GLP-1 drugs, like Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro, claiming they were not properly warned of the risk of a rare type of sudden vision loss, called nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, or NAION, when taking the medications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Researchers have been studying a possible link between GLP-1 drugs and this eye condition in recent years after a possible safety signal was reported from a single health center in Boston in 2024, but so far, no study has proven these drugs are the cause. (<a href="https://abcnews.com/US/glp-1-users-potential-risk-rare-type-vision/story?id=136635318">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian PM says OpenAI hacked government health website</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104226</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(AFP via Yahoo!) &#8211; A rogue OpenAI model bypassed safeguards during training and hacked an Australian government website, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said as he admonished the ChatGPT creator over an &#8220;obviously unacceptable&#8221; breach. The AI tool sought access to &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104226">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/christian-wiediger-WkfDrhxDMC8-unsplash-scaled-e1666130187202.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/christian-wiediger-WkfDrhxDMC8-unsplash-scaled-e1666130187202-1024x683.jpg" alt="Close up of a computer keyboard" class="wp-image-66137 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/christian-wiediger-WkfDrhxDMC8-unsplash-scaled-e1666130187202-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/christian-wiediger-WkfDrhxDMC8-unsplash-scaled-e1666130187202-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/christian-wiediger-WkfDrhxDMC8-unsplash-scaled-e1666130187202-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/christian-wiediger-WkfDrhxDMC8-unsplash-scaled-e1666130187202.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/world/articles/australian-pm-says-openai-hacked-232712261.html">AFP via Yahoo!</a>) &#8211; A rogue OpenAI model bypassed safeguards during training and hacked an Australian government website, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said as he admonished the ChatGPT creator over an &#8220;obviously unacceptable&#8221; breach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI tool sought access to a health statistics portal in June and &#8220;didn&#8217;t accept no for an answer&#8221;, sidestepping restrictions to breach a section hosting private files, Albanese said. (<a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/world/articles/australian-pm-says-openai-hacked-232712261.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ‘Godfather of AI’ on the Best Chance Humanity Has to Survive</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104224</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104224</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(The Atlantic) &#8211; Geoffrey Hinton still believes the potential benefits of artificial intelligence outweigh its potential for destruction. Since he left Google in 2023, Geoffrey Hinton, a Nobel laureate commonly recognized as the “Godfather of AI,” is perhaps best known &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104224">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389-1024x683.jpg" alt="Close up of a CPU" class="wp-image-69181 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/umberto-jXd2FSvcRr8-unsplash-scaled-e1679949881389.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/2026/09/what-the-godfather-of-ai-thinks-we-should-do/688748/">The Atlantic</a>) &#8211; <em>Geoffrey Hinton still believes the potential benefits of artificial intelligence outweigh its potential for destruction.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since he left Google in 2023, Geoffrey Hinton, a Nobel laureate commonly recognized as the “Godfather of AI,” is perhaps best known for his dire warnings about the technology he helped bring into being. He’s said it’s “conceivable that humanity is just a passing phase in the evolution of intelligence,” that he’s become aware that “there’s a danger of something really bad happening,” and that there is a “10–20 percent” chance that artificial intelligence could lead to the extinction of humanity in a few decades (although when pressed, he will admit that this figure is more of a gut feeling than a statistical analysis). (<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/2026/09/what-the-godfather-of-ai-thinks-we-should-do/688748/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s Not Good to Be Alone—with Chatbots</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104222</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-Ed]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(CT) &#8211; It seems the more we use generative AI tools, the more we feel alone. Using a chatbot is alluring, but it’s like drinking seawater—it appears to quench our thirst but in the end makes us thirstier. Will we &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104222">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971-1024x683.jpg" alt="a robotic hand touching a human hand" class="wp-image-68708 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/pexels-tara-winstead-8386434-scaled-e1677857658971.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.christianitytoday.com/2026/09/its-not-good-to-be-alone-with-chatbots/">CT</a>) &#8211; It seems the more we use generative AI tools, the more we feel alone. Using a chatbot is alluring, but it’s like drinking seawater—it appears to quench our thirst but in the end makes us thirstier.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Will we be continually conformed to AI, letting it “squeeze you into its own mould,” as J. B. Phillips paraphrased Romans 12:2? Jesus gives us a better way, and we need to choose it. We can be transformed by the renewal of our minds because God gave our brains neuroplasticity. What we focus on changes our brains’ structure. What fires together, wires together. (<a href="https://www.christianitytoday.com/2026/09/its-not-good-to-be-alone-with-chatbots/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Invisible Force Has a Mysterious Effect on Aging, Scientists Discover in &#8216;Startling&#8217; Breakthrough</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104207</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Geriatric & Aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(404 Media) &#8211; Scientists discovered that diseased fruit flies lived longer when they were removed from Earth’s magnetic field, while healthy flies had shorter lifespans, in a first-of-its kind experiment with surprising results. Scientists have discovered that the removal of &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104207">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/pexels-nicola-narracci-157460431-38032287-e1790291530285.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/pexels-nicola-narracci-157460431-38032287-1024x576.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-104208 size-full"/></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.404media.co/earth-magnetic-field-effects-on-aging-study/">404 Media</a>) &#8211; <em>Scientists discovered that diseased fruit flies lived longer when they were removed from Earth’s magnetic field, while healthy flies had shorter lifespans, in a first-of-its kind experiment with surprising results.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Scientists have discovered that the removal of Earth&#8217;s magnetic field influences the lifespans of fruit flies in complex ways, a finding that sheds light on the aging process as well as the risks of future human space travel, according to a study published in the journal <em>Aging</em> on Wednesday. (<a href="https://www.404media.co/earth-magnetic-field-effects-on-aging-study/">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>He Changed the World of Organ Transplants. Would He Die Waiting for His Own?</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104205</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organ Donation / Transplantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; A New York transplant surgeon’s experience waiting for a heart transplant laid bare the challenges of a system he had spent decades trying to fix. At the time of his Argentina trip, Montgomery was leading one of the &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104205">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/organ-donation-transplantation.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="790" height="410" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/organ-donation-transplantation.jpg" alt="a clinical worker holding a sealed box that says &quot;human organ&quot;" class="wp-image-19178 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/organ-donation-transplantation.jpg 790w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/organ-donation-transplantation-300x155.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 790px) 100vw, 790px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/23/well/heart-transplant-surgeon-pig-kidney.html">NYT</a>) &#8211; <em>A New York transplant surgeon’s experience waiting for a heart transplant laid bare the challenges of a system he had spent decades trying to fix.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the time of his Argentina trip, Montgomery was leading one of the nation’s premier organ transplant centers, at Johns Hopkins Medicine. He had developed innovative approaches to transplanting kidneys that had been adopted worldwide, and he would go on to play a leading role in the use of organs from genetically modified pigs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To him, organ transplants were one of the most effective medical treatments ever invented, their power to transform lives thwarted only by the shortage of organs available.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But it looked increasingly likely that he might die before he could get a heart himself. Despite his brush with death on the mountain, he was nowhere near sick enough yet to make it onto the list. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/23/well/heart-transplant-surgeon-pig-kidney.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Order Gives Parents Custody of Baby in Surrogacy Fight</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104203</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(NYT) &#8211; A surrogate refused to have an abortion after the fetus was diagnosed with a serious heart problem. She asked the justices to block a court order giving custody to the biological parents. On Tuesday, Justice Kagan, who oversees &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104203">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/adam-michael-szuscik-zu-eJEhMFEU-unsplash-scaled-e1704752364405.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1500" height="844" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/adam-michael-szuscik-zu-eJEhMFEU-unsplash-scaled-e1704752364405.jpg" alt="The U.S. Supreme Court building" class="wp-image-74345 size-full"/></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/22/us/politics/supreme-court-surrogate-abortion-custody.html">NYT</a>) &#8211; <em>A surrogate refused to have an abortion after the fetus was diagnosed with a serious heart problem. She asked the justices to block a court order giving custody to the biological parents.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On Tuesday, Justice Kagan, who oversees emergency filings from California, denied the surrogate’s request to block the lower-court ruling in the couple’s favor. She acted on her own without referring the matter to her Supreme Court colleagues. The justice’s order did not include an explanation, as is often the case when the court responds to such filings. (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/22/us/politics/supreme-court-surrogate-abortion-custody.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania measles cases near 800 as outbreak grows</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104201</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical / Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Street Insider) &#8211; The ‌Pennsylvania Department ​of ​Health reported 792 measles cases on Monday, 25 more than on Friday, as ‌the state&#8217;s outbreak grew further, remaining at ⁠the center of the nation&#8217;s worst measles resurgence in decades. (Read More)]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/diana-polekhina-BUfaFc4L8V0-unsplash-scaled-e1693429306271.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="634" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/diana-polekhina-BUfaFc4L8V0-unsplash-1024x634.jpg" alt="3 hypodermic needles" class="wp-image-71988 size-full"/></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.streetinsider.com/Reuters/Pennsylvania+measles+cases+near+800+as+outbreak+grows/27085044.html">Street Insider</a>) &#8211; The ‌Pennsylvania Department ​of ​Health reported 792 measles cases on Monday, 25 more than on Friday, as ‌the state&#8217;s outbreak grew further, remaining at ⁠the center of the nation&#8217;s worst measles resurgence in decades. (<a href="https://www.streetinsider.com/Reuters/Pennsylvania+measles+cases+near+800+as+outbreak+grows/27085044.html">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medieval mental health</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104199</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 22:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mental Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Aeon) &#8211; Saffron and ostrich liver were prescribed but so were exercise, gardens, animals, socialising, and music Influenced by stories of demonic possession (and there are lots of them, especially in saints’ lives and miracle collections), I long assumed that &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104199">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/elly-johnson-7sff_QVfpX4-unsplash-e1778191183455.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/elly-johnson-7sff_QVfpX4-unsplash-1024x683.jpg" alt="a woman smelling flowers" class="wp-image-102580 size-full"/></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://aeon.co/essays/the-curio-cabinet-of-medieval-mental-health">Aeon</a>) &#8211; <em>Saffron and ostrich liver were prescribed but so were exercise, gardens, animals, socialising, and music</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Influenced by stories of demonic possession (and there are lots of them, especially in saints’ lives and miracle collections), I long assumed that our ancestors’ attitudes to, and experiences of, mental health were completely different to our own – and that they would have little sympathy with our fast-growing mental health crisis. <sup></sup>But when I turned my attention away from religious texts, and began to research medieval ideas about healthy living, I soon came across medieval people who discussed mental health in ways that felt far more familiar to me.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The similarities were particularly apparent in medical writings, which outline a sophisticated argument that mental wellness was at the heart of a healthy lifestyle. (<a href="https://aeon.co/essays/the-curio-cabinet-of-medieval-mental-health">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAA debuts its AI-powered tool for managing flight traffic</title>
		<link>https://bioethics.com/archives/104197</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioethics Pundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioethics.com/?p=104197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Politico) &#8211; The Federal Aviation Administration on Monday rolled out its artificial intelligence-powered tool to manage flights for the three major Washington-area airports, bringing the technology live to air traffic control operations in the U.S. For months, Transportation Secretary Sean &#8230; <a href="https://bioethics.com/archives/104197">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile"><figure class="wp-block-media-text__media"><a href="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/artturi-jalli-WUYFbcqrtiw-unsplash-scaled-e1673031401568.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/artturi-jalli-WUYFbcqrtiw-unsplash-scaled-e1673031401568-1024x683.jpg" alt="Airplane flying in the sky" class="wp-image-67544 size-full" srcset="https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/artturi-jalli-WUYFbcqrtiw-unsplash-scaled-e1673031401568-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/artturi-jalli-WUYFbcqrtiw-unsplash-scaled-e1673031401568-300x200.jpg 300w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/artturi-jalli-WUYFbcqrtiw-unsplash-scaled-e1673031401568-768x512.jpg 768w, https://bioethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/artturi-jalli-WUYFbcqrtiw-unsplash-scaled-e1673031401568.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure><div class="wp-block-media-text__content">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/21/faa-ai-tool-flight-traffic-01086258">Politico</a>) &#8211; The Federal Aviation Administration on Monday rolled out its artificial intelligence-powered tool to manage flights for the three major Washington-area airports, bringing the technology live to air traffic control operations in the U.S.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For months, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has touted the tool as a solution for the FAA’s air traffic control woes. FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford told reporters Monday that the Strategic Management of Airspace Routing Trajectories system, or SMART, would give controllers “much better decision-making capabilities.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bedford and Duffy also reiterated Monday that the tech will not replace air traffic controllers. (<a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/21/faa-ai-tool-flight-traffic-01086258">Read More</a>)</p>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
