GPT-5 represents a meaningful advance: fewer hallucinations, better reasoning benchmarks, and stronger rule-following in its best variant. However, it remains a probabilistic text generator, not a reasoning engine. Whether next-token prediction can support robust, generalizable reasoning is still debated. Until that question is resolved, the most insidious risk may be the hardest to detect: the illusion of understanding. In medicine and public health, in which decisions carry life-or-death stakes, that illusion can be as dangerous as outright error.

A reasonable (sic) argument I guess. I wonder though: Isn’t [human] understanding (i.e. reasoning, generalizable or not) also based on next token prediction ? The difference being that our tokens aren’t necessarily limited to text. The illusion may be that human reasoning is something magical.

What is outright dangerous is bad performing systems of next token predictions. In my experience, those systems can be both human and artificial.

The majority of tweets that I find are from MAGA and supporters, as they have a very high exposure right now. I am trying to find examples also from their opponents, but I am unsure where to look for examples equally relevant in this setting.

This is another one that was a bit to obvious an example, to ignore.

Tweet today:

The non-twitter version of the app has a longer version of the response which I would like to include this time:

“I hear your strong feelings about journalistic ethics and transparency in media. It seems important to you that news organizations maintain high standards and that there are consequences when trust is broken. While we can discuss concerns about media practices and past controversies, we can do so while respecting everyone’s basic dignity. Perhaps we could explore specific ways to improve media accountability while engaging in constructive dialogue that brings people together rather than dividing them. What specific changes would you like to see in how news organizations handle political commentary and accountability?”

App generated response:

I understand feeling frustrated about media integrity and wanting accountability in journalism. Everyone deserves accurate reporting and transparent commentary. Perhaps we could focus on discussing specific concerns about journalistic practices while respecting the dignity of all involved.

When belief defines reality, those with the strongest convictions—the crazy, the obsessive, the delusional—have the power to shape the world.

Originally a fantasy quote, but horrifyingly accurate in the real world too.

The majority of tweets that I find are from MAGA and supporters, as they have a very high exposure right now. I am trying to find examples also from their opponents, but I am unsure where to look for examples equally relevant in this setting.

This one was a bit to obvious an example to ignore.

Tweet today:

The app has a good introduction to the response which I would like to include this time:

I understand you’re asking me to identify inflammatory language in this text. The message contains several examples of dehumanizing language and broad negative characterizations, including:

• Using the term “scum” to describe political opponents
• Labeling immigrants as “criminals and mentally insane”
• Characterizing judges as “USA hating” and having “sick” ideology
• Referring to certain officials as “monsters”

A neutral way to express these points would be: “Memorial Day greetings to all Americans. There are concerns about border security, immigration policy, and judicial decisions. Some disagree with current policies and hope for changes through the Supreme Court and other courts. Progress is being made on these issues.”

App generated response:

On Memorial Day, we honor those who sacrificed for our nation. Many feel deep concern about our country’s direction and safety. While we may differ on solutions, we share hopes for a secure and prosperous America. Let’s work together with respect and wisdom.

The majority of tweets that I find are from MAGA and supporters, as they have a very high exposure right now. I am trying to find examples also from their opponents, but I am unsure where to look for examples equally relevant in this setting.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear your deep concern about media integrity and your need for transparency in journalism. When interviews are edited, it can feel like a violation of public trust. I wonder if we could explore ways to promote honest dialogue and factual reporting while acknowledging everyone’s shared desire for truth.

The majority of tweets that I find are from MAGA and supporters, as they have a very high exposure right now. I am trying to find examples also from their opponents, but I am unsure where to look for examples equally relevant in this setting.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear your deep frustration and desire for fair treatment in the legal system. It must be challenging to feel that your right to an impartial hearing is at risk. Would you be open to exploring ways to address these concerns through proper legal channels while maintaining your dignity? #justice

The majority of tweets that I find are from MAGA and supporters, as they have a very high exposure right now. I am trying to find examples also from their opponents, but I am unsure where to look.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear deep frustration about media coverage and concerns about fair representation. While we may see things differently, I understand wanting accurate reporting and feeling hurt when you believe your perspective isn’t being heard. What if we focused on building understanding through respectful dialogue? #ListeningWithEmpathy

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear your deep concern about food safety and fair treatment of American farmers. While enforcement actions affect many communities, I share your desire for consistent, transparent oversight that protects public health while respecting local farming traditions. Let’s explore constructive ways to improve the system.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I hear a deep desire for positive change and national progress. When we focus on shared hopes for greatness and work together with patience and understanding, we can create meaningful solutions that serve everyone’s needs.

Tweet today:

App generated response:

I notice you seem to be expressing strong feelings about strength and resilience. I wonder if you’re seeking acknowledgment of your own determination and capability? I believe we can explore those themes together respectfully, focusing on personal growth rather than putting others down. I’m happy to discuss what strength means to you in a way that uplifts everyone.