BlogoZone

World Cup Soccer 2010 Life Lessons

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:40:00 +0000

Begun in 1930 World Cup Soccer takes place every four years. Over the span of one month 32 teams, usually representing all liveable continents, participate in the equivalent of American college basketball's March Madness. Though soccer is becoming more and more popular in the United States, millions of Americans still think all the soccer craze is madness that cannot be justified. (In fact, SearchWarp does not have a Soccer section under the Sports category, so I posted this article under "Other Sports", and that for the one sport that most of the world's people play and watch!) Some Americans have posted "Why I Hate the World Cup" articles and blogs. Let me share why I love soccer and the World Cup. Read the rest of this blog...

Here is The Greatest Christmas Wish

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:01:00 +0000

Clarence Edward Noble Macartney was born in 1879 and died at age 78 in 1957. He is most remembered for ministering 27 years at First Presbyterian Church in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Unlike most American preachers today, Rev. Macartney's preaching attracted mostly men “not only to his Sunday services but also to his popular Tuesday noon luncheons.”

In 1943, Abingdom Press published Great Nights of the Bible, a collection of sermons by Rev. Macartney. In that collection is the sermon “The Night of Nights” in which the great preacher explained why the night Jesus, the Man of Peace, was born must remain the greatest night in history.

In the sermon, Rev. Macartney relates an incident that took place the first Christmas after the start of World War I. He said “the colossal armies” of Germany, France, and Great Britain “had fought themselves to a standstill, and now millions of their soldiers were glaring at one another out of the trenches that gashed the earth from the North Sea clear to the Alps.”

=> Read on...

Why Didn't They Use Video Conferencing for the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference?

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:19:00 +0000

The credibility of the climate-change gods is on the line once again. Changing their verbiage from global warming to climate change cannot conceal whatever they are hiding. Following on the heels of email gate, which reveals that warm-earth activist scientists silenced certain voices that differed from theirs, it may not be an exaggeration to brand this Copenhagen Climate Change Conference as the Who's Who of Global Warming Hypocrites.

It seems like hypocrisy (a mismatch of belief and behavior) continues to be a hallmark of leading global warming activists, and this Mother of the Global Warming Congregation is the biggest "Do as we say, not as we do" sermon yet.

To their credit the organizers did pick the right venue. Denmark leads the world in energy-generating wind mills, powering 19% of its electricity from wind turbines. So the Danish deserve to be the poster country for clean, green energy.

Besides choosing the right host, the climate gods should have taken two other actions if they wanted the world to take them more seriously.

=> Read on...

White House State Dinner Party Crashers: Fame or Crime?

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:11:00 +0000

Instead of President & First Lady Obama along with India's Prime Minister Manmohan & Mrs. Singh remaining the focus of the Obama's first state dinner, it is Tareq & Michaele Salahi that have stolen the media spotlight. Not to mention that the uninvited couple won photo ops with some of the biggest power players on Pennsylvania Avenue, as they took pictures with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. But their biggest catch was a photo-shoot with none less than the #2 man of the United States, VP Joe Biden himself. The Salahis have the Facebook evidence on their successful adventures. As of the writing of this article, Facebook seemed to have taken down Michaele and Tareq Salahis' page.

The big joke may be on the Obama White House, whose security credentials have now come under scrutiny. This after the low-flying aircraft debacle of April 2009. One logical query by non-Obamaics is, "If this bunch can't secure the house where they live and party, how can they oversee the security of the United States?"

Incompetence can be a delicious word for those who have already concluded this administration doesn't know much of anything it's doing.

Reports Jake Tapper, Senior White House Correspondent of ABC, "It's one of the most secure places on earth, but two Washington area socialites and reality TV wannabes were apparently able to get behind the gates at the White House and mingle with the crowd at the State Dinner in honor of India last night."*

Who were the party crashers (if they did crash the party)? They are Tareq and Michaele Salahi, labeled as "socialites and reality TV wannabes".* They are further described as "polo-playing socialites".*
Mrs. Salahi claims to be a former Redskins cheerleader. The Salahis are a "Virginia couple who reportedly want to be on the D.C. version of Bravo's 'Real Housewives' series."*

According to NBC Washington, Michaela is a model and wife of Tareq Salahi, president of America's Polo Cup and owner of Oasis Winery. Tareq Salahi reportedly runs Oasis Winery near the Shenandoah. The winery's website claims it is "one of the top 10 in the world -- the only North American winery to make the list."*

The Washington Post says, "Even before their brush with reality TV fame, the couple had gained some notoriety for a long-running feud with Tareq's parents, Dirgham and Corinne Salahi, over control of the family's Oasis Winery in Hume, Virginia. Last year, Tareq accused his mother's attorney of punching him; the lawyer was found not guilty. Court records show that Oasis filed for bankruptcy in February, with Tareq listed as 'debtor designee'".*

On the embarrassment this flamboyant couple has dealt the White House, Ed Donovan, Secret Service spokesperson, said the agency is looking "into a report that two individuals not on the guest list were in the event."

To stress that there was never a security risk, Donovan said, "Everyone that goes into the white house grounds goes through magnetometers and other levels of screening."

Besides the publicity-stunt value of this incident, did the Salahis commit a crime? In a Thanksgiving Day statement, Mahogany Jones, the Salahis' publicist, said the couple's counsel, Paul W. Gardner, "states emphatically that the Salahis' did not 'crash' this event. Jones added, "We look forward to setting the record straight very soon."*

For his part, Paul Morrison, a Virginia lawyer who in the past has represented the Salahis, downplayed the couple's action by saying, "They just went to a party. They didn't do anything wrong."*
However, a former government official begs to differ. He told CNN, "If you lie to a federal official, either secret service or the social secretary, if they lied their way to get in, and it seems they would have had to have done that, that's a federal felony."

Whether or not the Salahis has done something worthy of a crime, one thing is sure: they have gained that coveted American prize: ATTENTION. And to realty-TV-types, any attention is better than no attention. In that case the Salahis getting on national television at the expense of the Obama White House's security lapse can be nothing less than a realty-TV jackpot.

But consider this: What if this couple did not crash the party after all? What if they got insider help to slip into the dinner halls under the security radar? That is a real possibility, but we shall see.

* Sources: ABC News, NBC Washington, Washington Post

Time Management Woes: Losing to the 5 Most Notorious Thieves of Time

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:12:00 +0000

In a meeting I was never invited to, the civilized world agreed long ago that I should have no more than 24 hours in a day – 12 hours of daylight and 12 hours of nighttime. I can't even add a single hour to my day. Then sleep experts got together and decided that I spend about 8 hours of my lifetime sleeping each day.

OK, let me clear the sleep from my eyes and do the math: 24 hours minus 8 hours leaves me just 16 hours. What? I should spend 1/3 or 33% of my life asleep? Could a hermit or armadillo do any worse?

Having just 66% of this important currency of life to work with, you would think I'd be a much better time manager, being most diligent to make the most of every waking hour. Sorry to disappoint you; I often find myself squandering precious time far beyond the 33% I lose just by being human.

Years ago I learned the principles of time management, but I have yet to master what it takes to keep the most notorious thieves of time in check. They seem to break in at will and rob my time treasure.

=> Click here to read the rest of the article.

The Four Uses of Money: How Well Are You Doing?

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:18:00 +0000

No matter how one earns or receives money, there are just four good ways to use money. If you can consistently practice all four uses, you rank as one of the few responsible money mangers in the world. Just in case you are curious to know, let me admit that I regularly wrestle to master these uses of money.

1. Spend it. This is the use of money most people have mastered. In fact, the typical person does such a good job at spending money we usually have very little left. Worse, we may spend all of ours, and then borrow other people's money to spend as well. Not a brilliant thought.

Click here to continue reading...

What to Do When You Get Ripped Off by Smart Savings Center

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:16:00 +0000

All you wanted to do was buy a book or some other item on the Internet. You see a great price, and you jump on it. Then the deal gets sweeter, as you compare prices, using one of those price comparison sites. Along with the deep discount, you're getting free shipping too, and that's because you are a first-time buyer. Yes! Unlike your less informed peers, you are that tech savvy online shopper that pays $6 for a $19 book.

Perhaps you decided to to the transaction at Amazon dot com, or Hot Book Sale dot com, or another site, where Smart Savings Center lurks behind the screen. Approximately 8 days or more after the deal, you'll be sounding like one of these folks who got ripped off by Smart Savings Center, not to mention me and my wife who fell victim to Smart Savings Center's sneaky scheme.

Click here to continue reading...

Should Obama Remain Silent on Middle East Conflict?

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:19:00 +0000

If you believe Israelis' claim, Hamas has been firing rockets into their homeland, and thus endangering, injuring, and killing Israeli civilians for more than 6 months. Accordingly, the Israelis say they had to respond to the national security threat posed by the hostile regime in Gaza.

If Israel is telling the truth in their claim, then, in light of such a severe security danger, one can't help but ask, "Why did Israel wait that long to take action against Hamas?"

One plausible answer might be that the Israelis were reluctant to endure a repeat of the Lebanon debacle, where the elite military all but got its butt kicked by Hezbollah in 2006, probably because Israel sought to fight a politically correct war, according to some pundits.

Click here to continue reading...

Strategies, Tips for Making and Keeping Your New Year's Resolution

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:42:00 +0000

Let's start with a couple of definitions.

The word "resolution" is the noun of the verb "resolve", to reach or make a strong decision about something. You may have noticed "solve" in "resolve", as you see "solution" in "resolution". When we say "resolution", as in NYR, we're talking about solving a problem in order to change a chosen area of your life.

A New Year's Resolution or NYR is a vow, promise or commitment you make on New Year's Eve or on New Year's Day to change a habit or do something different that will benefit you. Once made, the NYR remains in effect until you achieve or abandon it.

Click here to continue reading.

Having a Great Personality: Why Your Appearance Counts So Much

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:38:00 +0000

"It's what's in the heart that counts."

That's true … especially for the person saying it, and for few others who take time to look past the outside of the person speaking those words.

But for the vast majority of people, "what's in the heart" matters not much, not obviously. And it is these normal people that you may have to live with and relate to most of your life. So it matters what they think of you. If how they see you differs greatly from how you see yourself, you may have a serious problem.

While "God looks at the heart", people do not see your heart. People look at you, unless they are visually impaired or legally blind.

Click here to continue reading.

Rick Warren Correctly Answers "What Would Jesus Do?"

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:38:00 +0000

As long as Christians discuss the question, "What would Jesus do?" as a book title, as a thought, as an idea, as a theory about what it means to be like Christ, it's mighty easy to claim we really know what Jesus would do in every given situation.

But the answer to the question never ceases to rattle our religious cage once we see flesh and blood step forward and dare to actually do what Jesus would do. Whenever that happens, that embodiment of the real Jesus suddenly becomes a favorite target of attacks, criticisms and complaints.

In his unexpected friendship with Mr. Barack Obama, whom some call the most liberal politician to ever run for the American presidency, Pastor Rick Warren of Saddleback Community Church has become the latest public portrait of the true Jesus.

Read the rest of the article.
=> http://searchwarp.com/swa412580.htm

Understanding Biblical Meditation -- A Study of Psalm 19

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:03:00 +0000

Of all the Bible references with the word "meditate" or "meditation", I think the 19th Psalm is the primary passage on biblical meditation. The author of this song is King David, the father of biblical meditation. The key verse is #14, which reads,

"Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable in Your sight, O LORD, my strength and my redeemer" ( Psalm 19:14).

Based on this psalm, let's develop 4 points about the discipline of biblical meditation: the arena of meditation; the audience of meditation; the aim of mediation; access through meditation.

1. The Arena of Meditation: Worship is the arena of meditation. You cannot meditate until your mind enters the sphere of worship, where you begin to focus on spiritual things.

As David entered into worship, he set his mind to meditate on three important areas or angles of his life.

(a) Creation (vv. 1-6). David could not meditate on creation without thinking about the Creator. When he raised his head and looked at the sky, he saw the handiwork, the signature of Elohim, the God of creation. The heavens reminded him of God's glory. With his eyes up there, David zoomed in on the morning sun rising, comparing it to a bridegroom marching in splendor and majesty towards his bride on wedding day.

=> Meditation will help you "see" the environment and the beauty of God's creation. Which is your favorite part of creation? For David, it was sunrise. For you it might be sunset, the moon, a bloom of flowers, trees, a butterfly, the beach, a rainbow. Why not focus on that, see what thoughts come to your mind, then speak those thoughts as your praise to the Creator. That's meditation.

(b) Next, David meditates on God's Word (vv. 7-11). He values the Law of God above "gold", which represents all earthly possessions. He says God's word, like food, tastes sweeter to him than "honey", which symbolizes all the pleasures of life.

=> What is your favorite portion of Scripture? Is it the 23rd Psalm? Is it John 3:16? Focus on the key words and phrases of that text from the Bible. Now mentally begin to squeeze some meaning from the text. Speak the thoughts that come to you. That's meditation.

(c) Finally, David meditates on himself, his character. He takes personal inventory of himself. He does some self-reflection, self-examination (vv. 12-13). The word of God serves as a mirror that shows David his real self, not the King David that his subjects know, but David as he truly is, naked in God's sight. David sees some good in himself, just as a mirror will show you what's right about you. But the mirror of the Torah (God's Law) also reveals David's flaws and faults. And when David confronts his not-so-great parts, he realizes his need for soul cleansing that God alone can provide. So he asks God to deal with his little sins in order to protect him from the big sins, the "great transgression".

=> What image of yourself has God's word shown you? Where in your character are you making progress? Where are you more Christlike? Praise God for that. Where do you need some cleanup? Ask God to purify your character. Such a spiritual cleansing is part of meditation.

2. The Audience of Meditation: God is the main audience of meditation. We know that from David's words, "O LORD (Yahweh)". This means the most important reason and purpose for meditation is to connect with God and to commune with God. Yahweh is the One David is talking to and thinking about as he meditates.

When you meditate, you should speak directly to God, not to yourself. Speak to God in the second person, "You". Think on God, not on yourself and your problems. Meditation is not being absorbed with self and your concerns and interest. To meditate is to preoccupy your mind the Almighty and to speak your thoughts as you muse on God.

3. The Aim of Meditation: David says, "Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart". What is a person trying to achieve when s/he meditates? To bring about a union of mouth and mind. To unify tongue and thoughts. To join your words to your thoughts and emotions. To get your mouth and heart to sing from the same sheet of music. In the Bible, "heart" and "mind" are closely linked. According to Scripture, you think in your heart (See Proverbs 23:7; Matthew 9:4). Meditation reaches its highest form when and where the wholesome words of your mouth kiss the pure thoughts and emotions of your heart. In meditation you aim to purify your heart, your thoughts and emotions, which in turn will purify your words. This will help to develop you into a better, brighter character.

When you meditate, your primary desire is for God to be pleased with your speaking, thinking, and feeling: "be acceptable in Your sight". That word "acceptable" is the word for "pleasure". That was David's desire: "God, I want the words I say, the thoughts I think, and the emotions I feel to please You. I want You to look upon my words, thoughts and emotions, and nod. It is important to me that You are pleased with what I say, what I think, and how I feel."

4. Access through Meditation: David's words are, "O LORD, my strength and my Redeemer!" Meditation is a medium, a means to an end, a path to a destination. Through meditation, you can access divine resources, God's supplies for your life. That's why it is crucial for you to first connect with the Divine. David mentions two resources you can access through meditation: strength and redemption.

One of the chief goals of meditation is to receive strength from God. The word translated "strength" here is the word for "rock". David is calling God his Rock, his foundation, the constant of his life.

Strength from God or divine empowerment is one of the greatest benefits of meditation. To meditate is to acknowledge and admit that you don't rely on yourself or other people for inner strength. When you meditate you are telling yourself, "I need a power greater and higher than myself to be the best and most I can be as a person. My strength runs out, and I need my strength renewed regularly." You tap into God's unlimited strength through meditation. (For God's ability to give you new strength, read Psalm 46:1; Proverbs 18:10; Isaiah 40:29-31.)

David addresses Yahweh as "my redeemer". The meditator regards Yahweh as the Redeemer. The word "redeem" basically means to "buy back". In our day, it roughly corresponds to "recoup, recover, make up for losses".

For example, due to the steep drops in the stock market, some retirees have lost millions of dollars in the retirement accounts. If the market was to reverse course, and those retirees were to recoup all of those losses, we would say the retirees or their accounts have been redeemed.

In this Psalm, David is saying, God has the ability to recoup or buy back what we have lost. He can make up for our losses. He can reverse the trend. How? When we look to God rather than rely on ourselves, the Almighty can empower us to achieve in 5 months what might have taken us 5 years to recover. When we team up with God, we can double up and recover much more quickly. God is the Redeemer, the Maker Upper.

Meditation is one powerful way to tap into this divine power to redeem, recoup, recover, restore whatever you may have lost.

But it gets even better. Not only can Yahweh redeem our losses, He can redeem us! David says, "my Redeemer". He is not just the Redeemer of my time, my relationships, the resources I may have lost. He is "MY Redeemer". He redeems ME. God has the power to buy me back when I am lost, when I have lost it, when I have lost myself, whenever I have sold myself out. Meditation is the spiritual currency that makes such a transaction possible.

How useful, how powerful meditation can be! It is God's prescription for your sanity, a sound mind. Meditation is medication. Try it today.

Learning from the Father of Biblical Meditation

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:09:00 +0000

The Book of Psalm is the Bible's hymnbook, a book of praises and prayers. And the person who wrote half of the 150 Psalms was the man named David. Known to many from the "David and Goliath" Bible story, David became Israel's greatest and most beloved king.

The 19th Psalm, whose theme is meditation, was written by David. David's life experiences show us how or why he became the master of meditation. Though many of the prophets, apostles and saints of the Bible were students and practitioners of meditation, I think it is to David that we should award the title "Father of Biblical Meditation".

What are some of the details of life that must have drawn him to meditation?

(a) David was the last of 8 sons born to Jesse, a man from Bethlehem in the tribal land of Judah. David was not seen by his dad as leadership material. That could be why Jesse never brought David to the family gathering when the Prophet Samuel came to town to anoint one of Jesse's sons to be the next king.

=> David might have used mediation to comfort himself as the black sheep of the family.

(b) David was the shepherd of the family's flock. Keeping sheep out there in the fields must have been a lonely and dangerous job, especially for a young boy. David tell of an incident when a bear came after his sheep, and another occasion when the encroaching predator was a hungry lion. Both times the young shepherd put his life on the line and saved his sheep from the teeth of the beasts.

=> Through the discipline of meditation, David was able to overcome the fears associated with his job.

(d) David became a poet, songwriter, harpist and singer. As a young man, he was so good at composing and playing inspired music that King Saul, the first monarch of Israel, hired David to give the king music therapy to relieve Saul's chronic stress and depression (1 Samuel 16:14-23).

=> David used his music as a means for meditation. It was wise of him to meditate through music. Musical meditation is mystical medication for the soul.

(e) Later in life, David, after he was anointed by Samuel, became the target of King Saul's envy, anger and murder plots. For the most part of 20 years, David was on the run, hiding from Saul.

=> During those years of wandering and running for his life, David encouraged his heart and soothed his soul through the art of meditation.

(f) After Saul died, and David became King of Israel, he still had many battles to fight, especially with the Philistines, Israel's mortal enemies for much of David's reign. David had to function as a warrior-king.

=> As a warrior with battle plans to lay out, and as a monarch with administrative duties, David found much wisdom in meditation.

(g) Also, despite all his achievements on the national and global stage, David had a dysfunctional family. Apparently, David was neither a great father nor a wonderful husband. The biggest moral failure of his life was his affair with Uriah's wife. After the adultery, which resulted in pregnancy, King David went on to plot the death of this loyal soldier on the battlefield. The guilt and stain of that double sin of adultery-murder haunted David's conscience for months, if not years.

Furthermore, David witnessed incest among his children. One of his sons raped one of David's daughters. That sister's brother (Absalom) murdered the brother who raped his sister. Eventually, Absalom, David's most handsome and beloved son, plotted a revolt that gain steam. King David was forced to flee the city and hide out in the country. In the process of this coup attempt, the rebellious prince engaged in broad-day sex with his father's women (concubines or half-wives).

=> In and through all of those difficult national and personal situations, the discipline of meditation was probably one of David's most used secret weapons. It was how he got through each day, whether as a boy in his family, as a shepherd in the desert, as a fugitive on the run from King Saul, as the warrior-king of Israel, and as a struggling husband and father.

The life of David, the Father of Meditation, teaches us that the busier you are, the more suited you are for meditation. The more responsibilities you have, the more you need to practice meditation. Meditation can be the most potent tool for a leader's mind. Take it from King David. Meditate.

Meditation: Rediscover a Spiritual Discipline

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:07:00 +0000

How important is meditation? Think of it this way.

What would driving be like if there were no stop signs and traffic lights, if vehicles did not have brakes on them, if you did not refuel or service your car?

No stop signs and no traffic lights would mean chaos in the streets. Far more accidents. Many more motor vehicle deaths. No brakes on vehicles would make driving one of the most dangerous activities around. If drivers did not refuel or service their cars, most cars would be parked somewhere, rather than be in traffic on the road.

Living can be like driving in traffic. You are the car, van, bus or truck. Just like a car needs brakes. You need time to pull off the road to fill up, serviced by the mechanic of your soul. You need stoppage time, fill-up time, and service time. You need to put on the brakes, sometimes the parking brakes.

The alternative is greater stress. High anxiety levels. Embattled relations. Broken links between family and friends. More dysfunctional households. Upswing in frustrations. Frequent complaining, fussing, quarreling, fights. More burnouts. Faster wears and tears. Even greater likelihood of suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts, actual suicides.

There is a spiritual discipline designed to put the brakes on when you need to stop. Fill up your spiritual tank when you need new fuel. Service your soul when you're burnt out, worn out, torn up, tired, weary. Open that stress valve and drain the pressure out to a trickle. Rejuvenate your inner self and get going again with new power, new energy, that new umph. Meditation.

Meditation and Personal Development

The major difference between how I react to insults, failure and disappointment now and how I used to react can be credited to the time I have learned to spend in meditation over the years. Without meditation I am edgy, irritable, short-fused, easily stressed out, worried. Mediation has made the difference in how I manage anger, stress, anxiety. How I deal with fear. How I handle failure. How I respond to disappointment. Meditation has helped to grow my spiritual life like few other good habits I've developed.

A Different Kind of Meditation

When you hear the word "meditation" these days, you may be thinking New Age, Yoga, or Eckankar, which calls itself "The Religion of the Light and Sound of God." The Eckankar practitioner believes that s/he can use meditation to see the light of God and hear the sound of God. The basic idea is to tap into your subconscious, so your soul can travel through the act or art of meditation.

Transcendental meditation is what some people think of when they hear the term meditation. No matter which New Age form of spirituality you take, when it comes to meditation, they all emphasize how you position your body in order to chant or do certain breathing exercises in order to expand your spiritual horizon. That can be useful.

However, the idea and practice of meditation we find in the Bible is quite different from the New Age version. Biblical meditation goes far beyond body position, breathing techniques, chanting or humming, though every one of those aspects can be used in the type of meditation I'm talking about. Biblical meditation is quite simple, yet it can be so powerful. So beneficial. So life changing.

Meditation, the Biblical Version

Christians have short changed themselves by hardly exploring the practice of meditation, by leaving New Agers and Eastern religionists to be the leading practitioners and experts on meditation. It does not have to be that way. Meditation is very much a vital part of biblical faith. The prophets, the apostles, the saints of the Bible were well versed in the art of meditation.

Through meditation, many Old Testament saints became giants of true faith. Abraham heard the call of God, and God showed him the fame of his future. Isaac used to meditate at sunset; he took a quiet walk in the woods. Moses spent as many as 40 days meditating on a mountain, as he listened to God and received special instructions from the Great One. Joshua led the tribes of Israel to conquer and settle Canaan, the Promise Land, by making meditation a daily habit. Joshua meditated on the Torah, the Law of God. Through meditation, Samuel the priest, judge and prophet helped to transition Israel from a loose tribal confederacy to a unified monarchy. By meditation the Prophet Elijah heard God in a fresh new way. In a "still small voice". Through meditation, David overcame great odds and was able to shepherd the Kingdom of Israel in challenging times.

New Testament saints continued the practice of meditation. John the Baptizer gave up the soft pleasures of city life to meditate with the Qumran faith community on the banks of the Dead Sea. John the Baptizer lived on a simple diet. He didn't mind having a wardrobe of camel hair clothing. Jesus Christ, at the start of His public ministry, spent 40 days in the desert, where He meditated, encountered the evil one and won over Satan by wielding the weapon of Scriptures He had meditated on in the quiet of the wilderness. Simon Peter meditated in an upstairs room in the city of Joppa, where God showed him a vision to shatter Peter's lifelong prejudice. Without meditation the Apostle Paul could not have been so inspired to write more than half of the books found in the New Testament portion of the Christian Bible. Paul spent about three years in the Arabian Desert, probably spending much of that time in a meditative state. It was via meditation that John the Beloved received the end-time message of hope and encouragement known as the Book of Revelation.

Both in recent religious history and in our own day, the shining examples of spirituality have been meditators, if we can use or invent that word for the purpose of our discussion. Stepping in the footsteps of those saints, every follower of Jesus Christ needs to learn and practice biblical meditation. We'd do well to add meditation to our arsenal of spiritual disciplines, practices, resources.

Any Bible believer who practices biblical meditation will find that the best and brightest days of his/her personal, spiritual experiences lie not beneath the dust of the past but yet await him/her on a pedestal up yonder. And that future of spiritual bliss and boon can begin today. Enjoy your life of faith more than ever before. Enjoy spirituality to the fullest. Ready to elevate? All it takes is one practice. One discipline. We call it meditation. So meditate and elevate.

What You and Joe the Plumber Have in Common

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:37:00 +0000

During the first 10 minutes of the third and final debate between Obama and McCain, someone named "Joe the plumber" was mentioned 13 times, according to Philip Elliott of The Associated Press. Fox News says, the now famous plumber's name was mentioned by McCain and Obama a total of 26 times throughout the debate.

Already, every major news organization has done a piece on Joe the Plumber. He's been interviewed by CNN, Fox News, and the rest. And there's more to come. In fact, I just came across this on the Fox News website:

"Joe Wurzelbacher will appear on FOX News Channel's Huckabee program in an exclusive prime time interview to air this Saturday at 8 p.m. ET. The show will re-air on Sunday night, also at 8 p.m. ET. Wurzelbacher will appear on the program with his son and father."

During the October 15th debate, McCain injected Joe into the debate by telling Obama, "Joe wants to buy the business that he has been in for all of these years, worked 10, 12 hours a day. And he wanted to buy the business but he looked at your tax plan and he saw that he was going to pay much higher taxes... You were going to put him in a higher tax bracket, which was going to increase his taxes, which was going to cause him not to be able to employ people, which Joe was trying to realize the American dream."

Isn't it ironic that someone from an Obama campaign event ended up being McCain's best hope for points in the debate? Politics is a game of sudden twists.

McCain grabbed onto the Joe thing with bulldog tenacity, sensing that Joe gave him a golden opportunity to dress up the tax issue in flesh and bone. Later in the debate, McCain, said with emphasis, his eyes fixed on the camera, "Joe, I want to tell you, I'll not only help you buy that business that you worked your whole life for and I'll keep your taxes low and I'll provide available and affordable health care for you and your employees. And I will not stand for a tax increase on small-business income."

That came across as quite effective, and it probably scored the most points for McCain in the whole debate. Joe the Plumber might have become a winning ticket for McCain the Candidate.

Who is this average Joe, who has become the standard bearer for America's middle class, and an effective weapon on McCain's lips, if not the anchor of the senator's presidential hopes?

His full name is Samuel Joe Wurzelbacher, and he is a plumber who lives in Ohio. The plumber attended an Obama rally in Toledo. At the event, Joe told the Democrat nominee that Obama's plan to raise taxes on those making $250,000 or more would prevent him from buying the plumbing business, where he currently works. Obama responded to Joe by using the phrase "spreading the wealth", words which McCain seized upon to drive home his point that Obama's tax plan is bad for small business. Joe said Obama's response made him "uneasy".

Joe the Plumber is not saying who he'll vote for. To those who are curious to know how Joe will vote, the plumber says, "That's for me and a button to know."

Obviously, Joe the Plumber has given voice to those who are troubled by Obama's plan to increase the tax burden on individuals and businesses making $250K and higher. To make matters worse, Obama has not yet explained if his $250,000 ceiling refers to gross or net income. That clarification could mean a world of difference to so many Americans, and could mean votes too. That's important.

When asked later about his new-found national fame, Joe replied, "It's pretty surreal, man, my name being mentioned in a presidential campaign." Then he indicated that he might just capitalize on his popularity for his plumbing career.

All the tabloid juice aside, here is the really important question for those who care about higher taxes on anyone. What happens if Joe decides to buy the plumbing business, begins to make $250,000 per year, and President Obama raises his taxes?

He will do exactly what every "rich" business person does every time they have to pay more in taxes: Joe will reckon the new taxes as additional cost of doing business. Then he will find a way to pass that cost on to his customers by charging them more for his plumbing service. That's the way it works in the real world of business, and that's what it means when you hear people say, "Rich people don't pay taxes."

Every entrepreneur went into business to make a profit. While higher taxes may reduce the profit margin, a true entrepreneur will always find a way to "trickle down" the tax burden in the same way that the business passes down the cost when the business owner has to pay more for supplies, equipment, real estate or anything having to do with operating the business.

The same math magic works in the fuel industry: Say, politicians raise taxes on Exxon Mobil, the rich oil company. OK. All right. What does Exxon Mobil do? Don't worry, Exxon Mobil knows the game. Here it goes: raise the price gas stations pay for their supply of fuel. What will the owner of the gas station down your street do? That's right: raise your gas price at the pump.

So who ends up paying for the higher tax that Obama will levy on "Joe the Plumber" (the typical business)? You and I do. How? The next time you need a plumber, you'll pay for fixing your kitchen sink or unclogging your bathtub.

In a free market economy, higher taxes on business always mean higher prices for consumers who pay for goods and services.

One more point: If it does not make business sense for Joe the Plumber to raise the price on consumers, then he'll cut cost, say, by laying off an employee or two, or by not hiring a new worker. Also, the employer can respond to a tax hike by not giving employees a pay raise or a promotion that might require higher pay. Whatever way you cut it, it's the little guy who ends up paying the burden of higher taxes "on the rich". Beware!

Bottom line is whenever Uncle Sam raises taxes on Joe the Plumber (small or big business), we all end up paying more or losing more. That's what the rich and the politician have figured out, and what everybody else has yet to.

Actually, Joe the Plumber is not a licensed plumber yet. He has to take his state test first. That means his question to Obama was little more than a hypothetical, though the same cannot be said of Obama's response. Anyway, Joe the Plumber is the one Joe that's no longer an average Joe. Not bad for a guy who became famous at an event he never attended, a debate to which he was not even invited.

Rush Limbaugh’s Many Names for Barack Obama

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:28:00 +0000

When it comes to the politics of name-calling intended to belittle, demonize and smear, few influential figures do a better job than radio talk host Rush Limbaugh, who has been doing what he does best for 20 years now, dating back to 1988.

While there is much liberal talk radio just as addicted to smear talk, there is no liberal talk radio host who commands anywhere near Rush's audience of around 20 million per week.

We used to think that the years of President Bill Clinton would have been the peak of Limbaugh's harshest partisan attacks, as the uncontested master of the politics of personal destruction. But along came Barack Obama, and Rush has taken attack politics to a whole new level. He has even gone after Obama's wife and underage daughters. You don't dig any lower than that.

Rush Limbaugh salivated when Gov. Sarah Palin was contracted by Senator John McCain to join the ticket and save the McCain campaign in her role as McCain's vocal culturally conservative veep. Ever since Palin's arrival on the national stage, Rush has been re-energized like we've never heard him in years. Before then he had to settle for a sweet lemon attitude towards the moderate, maverick John McCain. But now, Limbaugh truly has a dog in this fight. With his own mouth, Rush said to Gov. Palin on his radio program, "I admire you so much!"

With Palin going to the cemetery to exhume Bill Ayres and wrap him like a corpse around Obama's neck, Rush is playing his part, covering the airwaves with the kind of animus that has made him the beloved of the hard right, with the millions of dollars that go with being the national hit man for all causes conservative.

You may ask why a politically independent guy like me would use my time to tune the AM dial on my radio to the Rush Limbaugh Show Monday through Friday for going 17 years now. Well, I do so for the same reason I watch or listen to the liberal media: to hear both sides out, so I can protect inner being from the kind of partisanship that blinds the heart and mind, the slam game that makes enemy combatants out of one's political opponents.

As a Rush listener, I have been keeping a tab on the various names, titles and descriptions that Limbaugh has attached to Democratic nominee, Senator Barack Obama.

1. Empty Suit: This tag means that Obama lacks substance. He's a puff of air. His speeches use words like "change" and "hope", but say nothing. Those who are taken in by "Barry Hussein's" fluffy orations of nothingness are emptier suits themselves, gullible souls to be pitied by the super-intelligent Limbaugh.

2. The Messiah: Rush used this title to say that Obama supporters regard the candidate as their political savior, like Jesus the Messiah. He also means that Obama sees himself as a God-size figure, who is shocked by disagreement, who despises those who challenge or criticize with him. Many Christians were offended by Limbaugh's sarcastic use "Messiah" for Obama, but their objections did little to restrain the conservative giant's fiery tongue from festering his twisted form of sacrilege.

3. Squirrel: With that tag, Rush describes Obama not only as crafty and sneaky, but to tie him with ACORN (Association Of Community Organizations For Reform Now), that group that seems to be practicing what conservatives are already calling "voter registration fraud". As a squirrel feeds on acorn, Obama is benefiting from the efforts of ACORN. Acorn feeds squirrel; ACORN works for Obama. Got it?

4. Liar: Rush often calls Barack a liar outright. According to Rush, Obama is not telling the truth about what he heard or didn't hear from Rev. Jeremiah Wright at Trinity United Church of Christ, where Obama attended for 20 years. Obama lies about his association with Bill Ayres. Obama is not telling the American people about his true liberal ideas. Guess who has picked up this theme? Sarah Palin is correct, who is a Rush Limbaugh listener, as she intimated in her interview with Mr. Limbaugh on Tuesday, October 14, 2008.

5. Radical: Though Obama has all but bypassed the political platform and tactics of a typical black politician, Limbaugh insists that Barack's liberal ideas will radically change America as we know it. Rush fails to mention how radically the current administration, run by one of his guys, has "radically" changed America!

6. Extremist: Rush does not regard Obama as a run-of-the-mill liberal. No, Obama is something far worse, and Limbaugh cites MoveOn.org and other ultra-liberal backers of Obama as proof that the man is an extremist, the same label that some American politicians apply to Islamic/Muslim extremists. In other words, Obama is no less dangerous to the welfare of America than the terrorists are.

7. Socialist: Limbaugh believes that Obama's healthcare plan and tax policies will turn America into a socialist country. But Rush has a difficult case to make in this case, since the takeover of the financial sector of the US economy has been under the auspices of a Republican administration, with Barack often being a reluctant go-along. Much of the socialization of the American economy is already in place, without Barack in the White House.

8. The Most Liberal Person Whoever Ran for the Presidency: This one is like the catchall stigma with which Mr. Limbaugh intends to shock American voters as far away from Obama as they can go.

There may be and there will be other titles coming from the wordy lips of Rush Limbaugh, whether or not Obama wins the White House. But the sum total of all the name-calling is this: "You should be scared of Barack Hussein Obama. Be very afraid!"

No wonder, for fear is the weapon of choice for political underdogs.

To Rush Limbaugh and others who share his disdain for Barack Obama, let me post this warning: Wait till Barack becomes President Obama. Then you may need a regular dose of Maalox or that antidepressant Limbaugh's doctor used to give him under the table. Watch Rush loose his sanity, watch his health take a nose dive, if Obama becomes president. In that nightmare scenario for the conservative juggernaut, the only hope will be another round of addiction to unprescribed prescription drugs for the biggest mouth in talk radio. Pity the man.

Before You Bash Judas: How Much is 30 Pieces of Silver?

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:30:00 +0000

The worst betrayal of innocent blood in human history took place during Passover week in A.D. 33, when Judas Iscariot, one of the 12 apostles of Jesus Christ, connived with the enemies to sell Jesus out.

As the treasurer of the group that travelled with Jesus of Nazareth, Judas was in tune with the value of money. On one occasion a female admirer of Jesus took a bottle of costly perfume and smeared Jesus with it from head to toe.

The extravagance got Judas so upset that he convinced the other disciples to rebuke Jesus and the woman for such a waste of costly perfume and precious currency.

Judas became so obsessed with money that he began to see "dollar signs" everywhere. As the moneyman, Judas realized that the religious establishment really wanted Jesus out of the way. "Wonder how much they'll pay for Jesus?" Judas might have thought. Judas reckoned that if the religious elite wanted Jesus dead badly enough, they would probably be willing to pay to get it done. But Judas also knew it would be nearly impossible for the high priest and his ilk to get a hold of Jesus without insider information. They needed an informant within the ranks of Jesus' close friends.

Aha, Judas saw his chance to strike it rich. In short order, he scheduled a secret meeting with the religious authorities, and he revealed to them the perfect plot to hand Jesus over with one kiss. Soon the religious leaders were all over Judas' plan, and they eagerly offered him 30 pieces (shekels) of silver on the spot. Judas had become their hit man. But how much money was 30 pieces (shekels) of silver? Was it that big a deal?

In Bible days, 30 shekels of silver was the price of a slave. The amount equaled 120 Roman denarii (plural). A denarius (singular) was one day's pay for a laborer. So 120 denarii equaled a worker's salary for 120 days or 4 months' pay.

But still, how much is 30 thirty pieces of silver in "dollars and cents"? Well, I checked some websites, including Gospel Mysteries, and here is what I found. If you convert 30 pieces of silver to dollar, it comes to about $950. According to the Professional Coin Grading Service, if you adjust the amount for inflation over the last 2,000 years, it becomes a whopping $250,000. "Such a sum likely would have purchased a small farm. Quite a bribe for the time"

So, what could you do with $250,000 cash in Kentucky, where I live? I can buy a brand new house cash down. With what's left, I can purchase one green vehicle (hybrid, electric or CNG) for cash. Next, I can put some money in a CD (certificate of deposit) or money market account to earn interest for months or years to come. (I wouldn't touch the stock market right now may be later.)

Just like the bribe was attractive to Judas, it would be most sumptuously tempting to the typical follower of Jesus Christ today. And it doesn't have to be blood money either.

Look, how many Christians would not accept $250,000 to never set foot in a church again, to never read the Bible again, or to flat out say, "I'm no longer a follower of Christ"?

The offer would become even more attractive if it came from someone of a different religion, asking you to switch from Christianity to their religion, or from mainline Christian faith to a cult that claims to be Christian.

People jump religious ship all the time for far less than 30 pieces of silver, for amounts much smaller than $250,000. All it may take is a scholarship, a job offer, an opportunity to work for double overtime on Sunday instead of going to church. It may take as little as one month's utility bill to get some Christians to shack up and hook up, switch loyalty, or hop from one church to another!

Selling Jesus out is easier and more frequent than we may want to think.

So before we get down on Judas, let's check our own hearts to see how tempting a $250,000 bribe would be to us today. Many of us might do the same thing, if we knew we could take the money and sell Jesus out without paying any obvious price or without being caught.

Hey, hey, don't forget the rest of the story: Judas was caught. With a rope around his neck. He hanged himself.

Betrayal can be fatal.

Everything Men Know About Women

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:20:00 +0000

I consider myself an expert on women. Why? Because I've been around women for most of everyday of my life. Being a middle-age guy, that's a load of experience and expertise.

To start with, I spent 9 months inside the tummy of a woman, or was it inside her belly? I know everything about mothers.

Then after I was born, I found out I had a sister, who beat me to the birth. I know a whole lot about sisters.

During my school days, everyone I ever dated was female. I know girlfriends like the face of my watch.

I was engaged thrice. Guess to whom? Ladies! So I know all about fiances too.

At age 28, I married a beautiful woman, one I call the Queen of Africa. Of course, I know all about wives.

While I was away in the United States, my wife gave birth to our daughter in Ghana, West Africa. Our daughter is a teenager now. Then late in the family planning game, boom, another daughter, who turns four in October 2008. You bet, I know all about daughters.

As you can see, it is no exaggeration, when I say I am an expert on women. From my vast experience inside a woman, around women, beside women, and with women, I have learned, and I now know everything there is to know about women, any woman.

Well, I know so much about women, it could take at least 60 months to lay out my findings for the benefit of my fellow male sub-species living off Mother Earth. But as the quintessential expert on anything and everything female, why would I need that much time? It just takes me 60 seconds to spell it all out.

Here -- everything men know about women.......

6 Other Ways to Say "Barack Obama is Black"

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:12:00 +0000

A recent CNN report begins with a line similar to this: Race still matters in America, the question is How much will race matter in the 2008 presidential elections?

As an African I am very grateful for how far America has come in race relations. My gratitude to those who shed capital, much heartache, sweat and blood, allowing us to eat at any restaurant, sleep at any hotel, sit anywhere on a bus, train, subway or plane, without seeing signs like "For Whites Only".

Things have changed so much that my children can date, engage or even marry whites, if they choose to.

In our lifetime, the biggest evidence of America's leapfrog progress in race relations is the candidacy of Senator Barack Obama, who would not be where he is today without the active support and actual votes of millions of whites, Hispanics, Jews, Asians and others, beginning with the Democratic primary elections.

Despite all the progress, however, it can be said that race remains the wild card, the X-Factor in the 2008 presidential elections in these United States of America. No matter how far ahead Obama may be ahead of Senator John McCain in the polls, there is no room or reason for comfort for him, because of the so-called "Bradley effect", less commonly known as the "Wilder effect".

According to Wikipedia, "the Bradley effect refers to a tendency on the part of voters -- black as well as white -- to tell pollsters that they are undecided or likely to vote for a Black candidate, and yet, on election day, vote for his/her white opponent."

But that is not the only tide Obama has to swim against. There are also non-blacks who have learned to conceal their unlikelihood of voting for a black candidate in the wrappings and trappings of some really clever talking points. These are what may be called "Other ways to say He's Black".

1. "He's just too liberal." "He's too liberal for me." "He's too liberal for this country." These people don't see that John McCain is not that conservative; he has signed on to so many liberal policies.

2. "He makes me nervous." "I'm uncomfortable with him." "He makes me uncomfortable."

3. "I'm scared of him being in that White House." "He could be dangerous to our national security."

4. "He sympathizes with terrorists like Bill Ayres."

5. "He's a Muslim, but he won't tell you that." "He's Arab." "His middle name is Hussein. He's Barack Hussein Obama." That probably ranks as the favorite of them all -- the religious litmus test. Is it anti-American to be Muslim? Is being "Christian" a requirement for the presidency of the United States?

6. "I can't vote for him, and it's not because I'm racist. I would vote for General Collin Powell for president." That's easy to say when General Powell is not running.

Of course, there are some elderly whites who still say it the old fashion way: "I can't vote for that black boy."

You know what, I think I prefer the straight talk kind. At least, we don't have to guess or second guess what they mean. It's the ones who "speak in tongues" that worry me.

For the vast majority of Americans who have conquered "the skin thing", let's hope that race will not be a major factor on November 4th.

Conservatives Will Vote for John McCain Anyway; Here is Why

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:30:00 +0000

In a previous article, I highlighted 8 reasons proving that John McCain looks more like a Democrat than a Republican. For practical purposes, Senator McCain is a Democrat in disguise.

That is one of the main reasons why the senator's presidential race with Barack Obama remains a close one. He's running as a moderate Democrat, similar to what Hillary Clinton did during the latter part of the primary election season. By the way, former President Bill Clinton used the same strategy; he ran as a moderate Democrat.

Worse than being a Democrat impostor, Senator McCain has been consistently bashing and blasting President Bush, the real conservative and current standard bearer of the Republican Party. McCain is running against Bush, as though Bush were his opponent or enemy. As one who voted for President Bush, the "compassionate conservative", I really have a problem with McCain's angry Bush bashing.

So, if McCain is more like a Democrat, and he's dumping on the Republican President Bush, why are millions of conservative Republicans gearing up to vote for this man, rather than holding him accountable for betraying his party and conservative principles, and turning on the leader of his own party under the cover of "maverick"? Here are some reasons...

1. Conservative voters have talked themselves into the "lesser of two evils" philosophy. McCain is a lesser evil than Obama. What a smooth way to compromise your core principle!

2. Conservatives don't want to be branded "single-issue voters". They've believed conservative radio talk show hosts like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity that, in the 2008 elections, winning is everything. Even if we conservatives have to vote for an alien, let's do so; at least that's not Obama.

3. Conservatives have nowhere else to go, short of not voting at all. But if you really stand for principle, shouldn't you be able to do just that some times? Or at least, you should vote for a third-party candidate, who may not win, but you would have not sold your soul in the name of voting the party line. Whatever happened to "our conservative principles"?

4. Conservatives are betting on McCain for the sake of judicial appointments. They have convinced themselves that John McCain will appoint "strict constructionists", who will "interpret the constitution", not "legislate from the bench". That means pro-life judges, of course. Good talking points, but how do they know McCain will keep his campaign promise on this? If the man has flip flopped on numerous issues before, who's to say he won't do so when it comes time to appointing judges?

5. Many conservatives will vote McCain, because they say Obama is "Muslim", which may be code for "He's black." (Check out the article, "6 Other Ways to Say 'He's Black'.) These conservatives' fear of or hatred for Obama drives them into the arms of McCain, who is actually ashamed to be lumped together with conservative Republicans, except for their votes come elections day.

6. Millions of conservative voters are hoping that a vote for John McCain is actually a de facto proxy ballot for Sarah Palin, the true conservative. These conservatives see McCain as merely a front, a figurehead, the shortest route to electing President Sarah Palin. Now, they may be onto something there, when you take Senator McCain's age and health into account. If elected, it is likely McCain may not serve out his term(s), and when that happens, the conservative grassroots will get their big wish of keeping the White House.

For these and other reasons, our conservative fellow citizens don't mind leaving this country in the hands of the party that has brought us this low, with our international reputation in the trash bin, our economy in the dumps, our president having no clue of how to fix any of it.

John McCain, A Democrat in Disguise; Here Is Proof

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:30:00 +0000

We know John McCain. A conservative he ain't. And conservatives know that. McCain is what Democrats typically used to be in the 1960s, what some Southern Democrats still are. Today, to shield the true identity of such politicians, we call them moderate, or in McCain's case, "maverick".

What's the evidence that Senator McCain is a moderate Democrat rather than a conservative Republican? I could give you a long list, but let's cite the major points.

1. Joe Liberman would not passionately support a true conservative. The only difference between John McCain and his pal, Joe Liberman, is party tag. To be fair, McCain has a pro-life voting record, but since he does not campaign on that record, we could assume that he votes pro-life as membership due in the hierarchy of the Republican Party.

2. Until John McCain flip flopped on illegal immigration, he was for putting undocumented immigrants on the path to citizenship. That's a Democrat position.

3. Until John McCain converted, he had been against offshore drilling for years. That's a liberal stance. Now, he's all "drill, baby, drill" or "drill here, drill now, pay less."

4. John McCain supports embryonic stem cell research. That's a liberal posture. Truly pro-life conservatives are set against the destruction of human embryos for stem cell research.

5. John McCain agrees with Al Gore that global warming is man-made. That is a liberal ideology. Conservatives who accept the notion that the global climate is warming do not attribute the rise in temperature to human activity. So McCain sides with liberals in this debate.

6. Since the Wall Street melt down, Senator McCain has railed against greed on Wall Street. If you didn't know he was a Republican, you would think the man is a populist like liberal John Democrat John Edwards.

7. John McCain says practically nothing for the pro-life agenda, which is the holy grill of Christian conservatives. Again, it seems like he doesn't want America to know that he's pro-life. Oh yeh, he mentions that he's against abortion, when he's behind closed doors with conservatives.

8. Senator McCain's latest liberal stunt came during his debate with fellow Democrat Barack Obama on October 7, 2008, at Belmont University. McCain proposed to spend $300 billion of taxpayer money to buy all the bad home mortgages in America. This new proposal seals McCain's Democrat credentials. This, in addition to the $700 billion bailout that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson got from Congress. Wow! McCain wants to get the federal government $1 trillion deep into the home mortgage business? What is fiscally conservative about that? Based on this stunt, who's the greater liberal, who's the socialist, Barack Obama or John McCain? I say, John McCain wins the label hands down!

This idea did not originate with McCain by any means. It's been talked about and written about by some economists and regular people alike, in fact by Search Warp's own Terry Mitchell. And let me add that I really like the proposal to help out homeowners by buying up their distressed mortgages in order to restructure their loans. I just want to point out that this plan does not fit the profile of the fiscal conservative that McCain claims to be. He may be putting forth this plan as a way to resurrect his falling poll numbers, but the fact remains that McCain doesn't mind winning this election as a pseudo conservative, an actual liberal.

Yes, he's still talking tax cut, but what national politician is not offering to cut our taxes these days?

So if John McCain has so little in common with conservative Republicans, why will they vote for him? Well, that's the subject of the next article, "Conservatives Will Vote for McCain Anyway; Here is Why."

Obama and McCain Break Even in Second Presidential Debate

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:07:00 +0000

With barely 28 days before the November 4th presidential election, Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain, just about broke even in their second debate that took place on Tuesday, October 7, 2008 at Belmont University, a Christian (Baptist) institution in Nashville, Tennessee. Tom Brokaw of NBC served as moderator.

The candidates were asked 21 excellent questions, to which they responded with fewer specific answers but more talking points from their campaign trails. Some of the questions were asked by members from a special audience of 80 undecided voters, who enjoyed special seating in the debate hall. I have listed the questions here, with the answers or no-answers from the candidates.

1. From the audience: What's the fastest and best way to help Americans suffering from the economic crisis?
=> Obama: general response
=> McCain will use $300 billion of taxpayer money to buy up all bad mortgages. This is a new plan from the McCain camp.

2. Who would you appoint as Treasury Secretary?
=> McCain: somebody Americans can trust.
=> Obama: William Buffett is one possibility.

3. From Oliver Clark: What's in the bailout package that will actually help American homeowners?
=> McCain: "You call it a bailout; I call it a rescue package." He spoke about how the Democrat-run Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac caused the current economic crisis.
=> Obama said without the package, credit would dry up, companies would be unable to borrow and meet payroll, and that may lead to job losses.

4. Do you think the economy will get worse before it gets better?
=> Obama: the bailout will help.
=> McCain praises the strength and ingenuity of American workers.

5. From Teresa Finch: How can we trust either of you with our money when both parties got us into this crisis?
=> Obama: I understand your frustration and cynicism. He contrasts the economy under President G.W. Bush with that under former President Clinton. Obama says his targeted spending will result in net spending cuts. (Independent sources dispute that claim.)
=> McCain: "I understand why you feel cynicism and mistrust." He recites his record of bipartisanship, saying solving our problems will require reaching across the aisle to work with members of all parties. He calls Obama a liberal, who has proposed $850 billion in new spending.

6. What will be your order of priorities: health care, energy, and entitlements (Social Security and Medicare)?
=> McCain: "We can do them all at once." He then recounts his bipartisan record that will help him do all of the above without giving one priority over the other.
=> Obama: "We're going to have to prioritize just like families do." He'll prioritize not just spending but taxes as well. His priority order is energy, $15 billion per year over 10 years; health care; education. He'll eliminate programs that don't work.

7. What sacrifices will you ask every American to make to ease the economic crisis?
=> McCain will implement a spending freeze; will cut defense spending.
=> Obama will provide incentives for Americans to buy fuel-efficient cars. He will double the size of the Peace Corps, so young people can serve.

8. How do Americans break the bad habit of too much debt and easy credit?
=> Obama agrees with the premise of the question, but he does not answer the question; goes on to spout unrelated talking points.
=> McCain says Obama wants to raise taxes. "I'll leave tax rates alone." He will increase child tax credit to $7,000 per dependent child. (That dodges the question too.)

9. Will you give Congress a date (2 years) to reform Social Security and Medicare?
=> Obama: we can't fix entitlement programs without addressing taxes. He will cut taxes for anyone making $250,000 or less.
=> McCain: "It's easy to fix Social Security; it's not hard." Medicare will be tougher to fix. It will take bipartisan effort. He says Obama has voted 94 times to raise taxes and has never in his political career supported a bill to lower taxes.

10. From Ingrid Jackson: What would you do within your first 2 years on the environment?
=> McCain bemoans the seriousness of a "damaged planet". He says the best fix is nuclear power, which does not pollute. He favors drilling for oil here at home, which will lower energy cost for Americans, though the use of petro may further pollute the environment.
=> Obama will create a new energy economy that will hire 5 million new workers. He sees the energy issue as a national security issue, because using alternative fuel will mean not buying petro from nations that mean us harm. He will invest in solar, wind, and other alternatives to petroleum. He says McCain voted 23 times against alternative fuel.

11. Should we fund one big energy project or several alternative energy efforts?
=> McCain will use a government effort coupled with the private sector.
=> Obama: no answer

12. Do you think health care should be treated as a commodity?
=> Obama speaks of lowering health care cost by using electronic records. No one should be excluded from coverage because of pre-existing condition.
=> McCain supports using online record too. He will set up community health care centers. He says Obama will impose mandates and fines on small businesses and families, if they don't participate in the Obama health care plan. McCain will give health care tax credit of $5,000, which people can use to shop around, even across state borders, for the best health care deals.

13. Is health care a privilege, a right, or a responsibility?
=> McCain: health care is a responsibility for every individual.
=> Obama: health care is a right for every American. He says the $5,000 tax credit that McCain promises will be taken back from the taxpayer through payroll deductions. "What the right hand giveth, the left hand taketh away."

14. How will the recent economic distress affect the U.S. ability to be peacemakers?
=> McCain: The United States is the greatest force for good in the world in history.
=> Obama agrees with McCain's statement on America being a force for good.

15. What is your doctrine for using the U.S. military for humanitarian purposes?
=> Obama: We should use our military for humanitarian reasons, but we must work in concert with our international allies, because we can't be everywhere.
=> McCain: We should temper our decision to use the military with our ability to beneficially affect the situation. We don't want a repeat of what happened in Somalia.

16. From Katie Hamm: Should the U.S. respect Pakistani sovereignty or ignore it to pursue Al Qaeda?
=> Obama won't cuddle a dictator like the Bush administration did for General Musharraf, former leader of Pakistan, who received American money but was signing peace agreements with the Taliban. If Osama bin Laden is in sight, and Pakistan won't get him, we should act to kill him within the borders of Pakistan.
=> McCain: We won't telegraph our punches. He dismisses Obama's tough talk, which McCain says will turn the local population against the U.S.

17. How will you reorganize the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan?
=> Obama will withdraw troops from Iraq to send to Afghanistan. He'll work to have an Afghan government that is responsive to its people.
=> McCain agrees with Obama that more troops are needed. He won't abandon Afghanistan like the U.S. did in the past.

18. From Terry Shirey: How can we apply pressure on Russia without restarting a cold war?
=> McCain wants Russia to understand there will be penalties for aggressive behavior, like what Russia did recently by invading neighboring Georgia. He will support effort to bring former soviet democracies into NATO.
=> Obama will do more than give moral support to those nations. He will help them rebuild their countries. We must anticipate problems before they happen; we have been reactive. Russia is using petro money to intimidate her neighbors. When the U.S. and those other nations around Russa switch to alternative energy, Russia will have less money from petroleum to use against her neighbors.

19. Is Russia under Putin an "Evil Empire"?
=> Obama: No, but there are nationalists within the government.
=> McCain: No. "I looked in Putin's eyes and saw three letters: a K, a G, and a B." Putin still operates like the KGB that he was.

20. From the audience: If Iran attacks Israel, would you commit U.S. troops to support Israel?
=> McCain: Yes, even though that will mean we'll have to sort out some issues with China and Russia, who will not like our military action in support of Israel.
=> Obama: We don't give the U.N. veto power over what America would do in such a situation. But we must keep all options on the table, including talking to our enemies.

21. What don't you know and how will you learn it?
=> Obama will learn from his wife, Michelle, what he doesn't know. (A joke, I think.) He says the challenge of the presidency is not what you know but the problems you don't expect that can consume your time and energy.
=> McCain: "What I don't know is what all of us don't know." He says there will be new challenges, there will always be the unexpected.

Conclusion
=> The town hall setting is home turf for McCain, who enjoys engaging members of the audience. McCain was not as condescending towards Obama in this debate. This time, he did not repeat too many of those "Obama doesn't understand, Obama is naive, Obama's foreign policy is dangerous." And he did manage to say once, "I agree with Senator Obama", or something to that effect. Coming from McCain, that was huge. But he might have erased his points on congeniality when he referred to Obama as "that one". McCain needed to win big if he is to regain momentum in the national polls, but he probably fell short of that threshold.
=> Obama drastically cut back on his many instances of "I agree with John McCain, and John McCain is right" on foreign policy discussions. Also, Obama seems to be mastering the art of connecting with individual persons who ask him specific questions. It seems like Obama is behaving like former President Clinton in his personal touch and eye contact with voters. Obama is also Clintonesque in looking like a teacher-politician, who simplifies the issues. Either Mr. Clinton has been coaching Obama, or the latter has been watching Clinton campaign and debate tapes. There is just too much Clintonian similarity in Obama's style to be incidental.
=> Strikingly, McCain did not bring up Obama's association with Bill Ayres, an issue that the McCain camp has recently resurrected. Similarly, Obama bypassed McCain's link to the S&L scandal. A game of chicken there -- seems like either man was waiting for the other to go first on this line of mud-slinging attacks.
=> Over all, I grade the debate as a tie, but I do give Obama the edge simply, because McCain failed to dominate the town hall style that is his cup of tea, and Obama was able to hold his own on foreign policy. It should be pointed out that McCain is demonstrating greater knowledge of economic issues, and when he chooses to, he is naturally better at giving short, direct answers to questions than Obama.

The third debate between the candidates is scheduled for Wednesday, October 15, at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York. The theme of that final debate will be domestic and economic policy. Bob Schieffer will be the moderator. Many believe that theme should favor Obama in lieu of the current economic meltdown. But don't count Senator McCain out just yet; he's been doing much better at discussing economic issues. Keep in mind that McCain has made several comebacks in this campaign, not to mention the dramatic comebacks that form the narrative of his exceptional life.

How Would Jesus Vote?

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:56:00 +0000

Since the 1990s, Christians, interested in imitating the example of Jesus Christ, have been reading books with such titles as "What Would Jesus Do?" "What Would Jesus Think?", and even "What Would Jesus Eat?" (That last book revolutionized my health in a most rewarding way.)

Those questions are easier asked than answered. Why? Because it is never that easy to lay Jesus out and crop Him around the corner, leaving us with nice and neat edges, a Jesus that suits our whims just right. So, while it's taken us more than a decade to answer such well-meaning questions as the above, why don't we complicate our lives further, the political animals that we are, by adding one more question to our interrogation box? "How Would Jesus Vote?"

Allow me to use one character from the pages of the New Testament Gospels to derive an answer to the question, "How would Jesus vote?"

The prophet who introduced Jesus to the world was John the Baptist (John the Baptizer). Jesus and John were cousins, and John was born 6 months before Jesus. In fact, Mary, the mother of Jesus, visited Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist, in the 6th month of Elizabeth's pregnancy.

In the spirit of the Old Testament prophets, John preached in a way that was directly political. In his preaching, he told tax collectors to stop their corruption. He confronted soldiers, telling them not to intimidate people. He looked over the crowd that came to him to be baptized, and he called them "brood of vipers", a bunch of snakes.

At age 30, Jesus approached John at the Jordan River, asking John to baptize Him. John felt humble and inadequate to baptize the One who was superior to him, the One who, unlike John, was sin-free. But Jesus urged John to fulfill his duty, and John finally complied. It was during this baptismal ceremony that John officially introduced Jesus and presented the Messiah to the nation of Israel in particular and to the world in general. That climaxed John's ministry.

However, after this peak experience, John's interest in the morality of politicians remained strong. The vassal king named Herod Antipas had married his brother's wife, whose name was Herodias. The historical record from the first century shows that Herodias was King Herod's niece. Well, John could not stand the sight of such blatant immorality in political high places. So he marched to Herod's palace and laid it on the line: "It is immoral for you to marry your brother's wife!"

That's what you call political preaching. Herod responded to John's public rebuke by arresting and jailing the prophet. And there in the dungeon, the mighty forerunner of Jesus sat, hoping that the Messiah he had proclaimed to the masses would take necessary action to liberate him from prison. But Jesus did absolutely nothing to rescue John. All John heard was that his Messiah-Cousin was doing great miracles for multitudes of people. Stunned, the heart-broken John call two of his disciples to his cold cell and sent them to ask Jesus a pointed question: "Are you the Coming One (the Messiah), or should we look for another?"

By his question, you can see easily read John's impression of Jesus at that time. John was convinced Jesus was failing in His Messianic mission to be the Liberating of God's people. Jesus' message to John brought little or no relief to the prophet, as John struggled with his dilemma, doubt and disappointment about Christ. Jesus told the messengers to recount more details of the miraculous works He was doing throughout the land. And none of those miracles had a thing to do with the politics of overthrowing the Roman government and ushering in the Messianic Kingdom.

John and Jesus never met or spoke again until John was beheaded by King Herod. It may not be mistaken to assume that John the Baptist died a broken and discouraged man.

The above account reveals a whole lot about the real Jesus of the Gospels, the unfiltered Jesus Christ. John's experience gave Jesus ample time and opportunity to function as a political Messiah, or at least, as a social activist in the worthy cause of getting the innocent man, John, released from jail. Jesus could have used His influence to put in a word with King Herod or with one of the officials in Herod's government for John's release.

Strangely, Jesus passed on the chance. What? Yes, Jesus did not take political action on John's behalf. Jesus did not cast His vote, if you will.

Like John the Baptist, many contemporary Christians would be disappointed in the Jesus of the Gospels. We would want Him to join our political cause to advance our liberal or conservative agenda. But Jesus might tell us exactly what He told John: Focus on My divine mission, not on your political agenda for Me. You are interested in My vote for your side, but that's not why I came. I came to earth to establish the Father's Kingdom, not your partisan kingdom. Your party may lose the election, but the Kingdom of God marches forth. Tell the liberals and conservatives the same thing I told Cousin John over 2,000 years ago,

"The blind see, the lame walk, lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, the wretched of the earth learn that God is on their side. Is this what you were expecting? Then count yourselves most blessed!" (Matthew 11:5-6, The Message).

From Jesus' dealing with John, it appears that when it came to political involvement, Jesus remained a hesitant, reluctant player, in fact, a nonparticipant. It's probably safe to conclude that, if He were physically walking the earth today, Jesus would still be a political no-show.

So "How would Jesus vote?" How about a better question? "Would Jesus vote?" And what if the answer is, "No!"? Would we be pleased to leave the Messiah out of our partisan, divisive, earth-bound politics? Would we let Jesus be nothing less than King of kings and Lord of lords, nothing less than Standard Bearer of the Kingdom of God, and not the almighty sponsor or supporter of the Republican Party or the Democratic Party?

16 Reasons Why I Write Articles for Search Warp, and Why You Should

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:27:00 +0000

As a writer, you will find it quick and easy to publish your article on Search Warp, and you will enjoy the experience and the journey as well.

This article you are reading is number 61 for me on Search Warp. My initial goal is to publish 100 articles. Beginning August of 2008, I made it a practice to write one article per day, 7 articles per week, or 30 articles per month for Search Warp.

Search Warp gives you the greatest opportunity to practice your writing skills in a informal environment. Search Warp understands that the Internet is the forum where everyday people can shine. It is not necessary to become an expert before you can publish your writing for hundreds of readers to see.

Besides my love for writing, there are other great reasons why I write for Search Warp, and why I encourage you to write articles for Search Warp. In fact, I will briefly give you several reasons why I'm a Search Warp author.

Reason #1: When you finish writing your article and click the "Save "button, it will take just 2 hours (sometimes sooner than that) to go public. That's right -- just 2 hours and your article is published. This makes it easy for you to write about current events and get your writing published while the news is still hot.

Reason #2: Search Warp does not require an article summary. Search Warp will use the beginning of your article as the introductory summary.

Reason #3: You don't need to type in keywords, labels or tags. Search Warp applies keywords to your article automatically.

Reason #4: Enthusiastic readers await your writing. Sometimes, I write and post an article, and in 4 hours or less, it has already been viewed numerous times. One article I posted on September 16, 2008, has been viewed more than 2,200 times about 20 days later.

Reason #5: Some of the readers at Search Warp like to leave comments, if they really like your article. Those readers' comments create buzz and give you a reason to chat with your readers.

Reason #6: The Search Warp control panel is very simple for you to set your author preferences.

Reason #7: You can join the Reader's Club, where you can review other writers' articles, and they can do the same for yours.

Reason #8: I like the "View Article Statistics" feature. There, you will see a list of your articles, how many times each article has been viewed, how many times Internet users have searched terms that led them to your article, and other details.

Reason #9: "Your Popularity History" shows a graph of where you rank on the Search Warp site. Currently, my popularity stands at 17,491. Just one popular article can send your popularity rating through the roof.

Reason #10: Search Warp also has "Fan Clubs", which are great for establishing contacts with other writers. When you read an article that you like, you can click near the heading of the article to join the writer's "Fan Club", and other writers can join your fan club.

Reason #11: Search Warp does not restrict you to publish your article on their website alone, unless you choose to give them that right. You have the freedom to publish your article elsewhere.

Reason #12: After you publish your article on Search Warp, you can edit your live article for instant republishing -- no waiting for re-review and re-approval. Just click on "Save", and your article remains live.

Reason #13: You can create your own blog website, using your articles at Search Warp. Just click on "Blog Settings" within your author area, and Search Warp will set up your blog in seconds.

Reason #14: There is even opportunity to earn small amounts of money with your Search Warp articles, with the use of in-text ads that insert links within selected words of your article. (For example, see the links in this article.)

Reason #15: Because Search Warp knows about search engine optimization, it is likely that Internet users will find your article when they type search terms into Google, Yahoo, and other search engines.

Reason #16: You can choose to use a pen name instead of your real name. It's easy. In fact, you can switch back and forth between your real name and your pen name. My real name is Moses Garswa Matally (M. Garswa Matally or M.G. Matally), but my pen name is "mogama".

There, some reasons great reasons why I'm crazy about being a Search Warp writer. Besides, the practice you get writing for Search Warp could prepare you to write your own book later or sooner, or you could just have fun sharing your feelings and thoughts with the rest of the online world.

Sign up as a new author today! Fill out this simple registration form to get started, http://SearchWarp.com/Register.asp

Redefining Education: What It Means to Be Educated In the 21st Century

noreply@blogger.com (Mogama) — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:42:00 +0000

Few years ago, I saw the first Internet ad offering me a chance to earn my master's or doctorate without attending one class on any campus. I thought it was some kind of scam, but I was wrong.

Though the traditional classroom still has its advantages, the trend is that brick-and-mortar classrooms will continue to merge, mix, and mingle with virtual learning sites.

Many of the teachers at my daughter's high school now have their students go online to do their homework and other assignments. And the Internet-savvy grade student can complete her portfolio or write a paper, using online sources, without setting foot in a library.

What does this mean for education? For one thing, it means that the age of the walking library or the human encyclopedia is over. The time is fast coming when high IQ will mean little in deciding who the smart people are. You will be able to determine how smart you can become, thanks to the Internet.

It is true that rote memory, the ability to recall information is still too much a part of the world's education systems. But the trend is moving away from recalling information to researching information or interacting with information.

Because of the power of the Internet to deliver content to the average person, experts in some fields will see their clout dip and decline. The experts most affected will be those in the social sciences, where research rather than technical skill is the key to establishing oneself as an authority in the field.

The days of "experts worship" are nearing their sunset. Who needs an expert when you can research the same information available to experts, and learn to spit out facts and figures along with corresponding analysis of those facts and figures? All you really need is a normal human brain, and you've got all the tool you need to become an expert on most topics you set your mind to researching. Now, the experts in these fields are not really going to like that, and many of them will strive to justify our need of them, but they themselves know and can feel the obvious: their reign is in jeopardy, their dominion is limited.

With the Internet bringing the knowledge base of the universe to anyone who knows how to read and has access to the World Wide Web, the education playing field has been leveled like never before. If there is a library in your town and you have a library card, you won't be missing out on much if you turn in your library card, if your primary reason for visiting the library is to research.

You can do just about all your research online now. There are free dictionaries, free encyclopedia, millions of articles and ezines. If you are new to online research, start your research, for example, by typing into the Google or Yahoo search box the words "free online encyclopedia", and bingo, over 8 million results to choose from, including encyclopedia.com.

Of course, every major newspaper or news organization has a presence on the Internet. You can even do without most newspaper and magazine subscriptions, unless you have some special reasons to keep your subscriptions. Now you can use the money you once paid for subscriptions to pay for your Internet service, and you will get so much more information for your money. Even some blogs (web logs) can contain quality information backed by research.

People, the Internet has redefined education. Education is no longer how much a teacher or student knows. Education has become how well you can research what you need to know or want to know. If you know WHERE and HOW to find the information you need, you are educated.

Education is no longer the learning of content as an end in itself. Education for the sake of education does not seem to make sense anymore. Education in the 21st century will come down to this: The truly educated person is one who has learned how to learn. Learning how to learn will soon become the essence of real education. That means the best teachers of this generation are those who train their pupils in the skills of research, teachers who coach their students to master the art of learning.

Here is the bottom line for what it means to be educated in the 21st century:

Reading comprehension & writing skill -- be able to read and understand what you're reading; be able to write well; be able to type. Yes, it still helps to read and write well, for that is the great equalizer in the education zone.
Communication skill -- be able to speak clearly and listen closely to others.
Technology literacy -- be able to use a computer; use email; use the Internet not only to conduct business but to do basic research; do more with a cell phone than make a phone call.
Cultural awareness -- be able to relate to people from other cultures; travel is one vital course on your cultural education curriculum.
Market literacy -- have a basic knowledge of the economy as it relates to investing and health issues.
Research skill with a hunger and thirst for knowledge -- it's worth repeating; you are educated when you've learned to learn, and it's a bonus if you enjoy learning.