<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>BlogSec News</title>
	
	<link>http://blogsecurity.net</link>
	<description>Contribute and Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:09:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BlogSecNews" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="blogsecnews" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">BlogSecNews</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/comment-page-1#comment-16621</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/#comment-16621</guid>
		<description>Any comments on the admin.php security vulnerability fixed in WP 2.8.1?  http://corelabs.coresecurity.com/index.php?action=view&amp;type=advisory&amp;name=WordPress_Privileges_Unchecked has a good summary, and if certain plugins are installed it can be used as a springboard to gain admin privileges.

@Mark - you need to run "htpasswd /path/to/htpasswd myusername" where the htpassd is the file created earlier with "htpasswd -c /path/to/htpasswd".  However... I have not yet managed to get htpasswd for the wp-admin directory working with WP 2.7, though I had it working fine for WP 2.6.5 (different blog and not so many plugins).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any comments on the admin.php security vulnerability fixed in WP 2.8.1?  <a href="http://corelabs.coresecurity.com/index.php?action=view&amp;type=advisory&amp;name=WordPress_Privileges_Unchecked" rel="nofollow">http://corelabs.coresecurity.com/index.php?action=view&amp;type=advisory&amp;name=WordPress_Privileges_Unchecked</a> has a good summary, and if certain plugins are installed it can be used as a springboard to gain admin privileges.</p>
<p>@Mark &#8211; you need to run &#8220;htpasswd /path/to/htpasswd myusername&#8221; where the htpassd is the file created earlier with &#8220;htpasswd -c /path/to/htpasswd&#8221;.  However&#8230; I have not yet managed to get htpasswd for the wp-admin directory working with WP 2.7, though I had it working fine for WP 2.6.5 (different blog and not so many plugins).</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=2XoiMBtLGkA:1-qUNjAOrmY:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=2XoiMBtLGkA:1-qUNjAOrmY:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=2XoiMBtLGkA:1-qUNjAOrmY:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?i=2XoiMBtLGkA:1-qUNjAOrmY:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=2XoiMBtLGkA:1-qUNjAOrmY:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=2XoiMBtLGkA:1-qUNjAOrmY:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?i=2XoiMBtLGkA:1-qUNjAOrmY:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/comment-page-1#comment-16441</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/#comment-16441</guid>
		<description>Can I ask where do you need to edit, to set your username,
using the code shown in the WP Whitepaper below?

#this file should be outside your webroot. AuthUserFile /srv/www/user1/.htpasswd AuthType Basic AuthName “Blog” require user youruser #making this username difficult to guess can help mitigate password brute force attacks.

Thanks I have it all working but dont know what the username is or how to set my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I ask where do you need to edit, to set your username,<br />
using the code shown in the WP Whitepaper below?</p>
<p>#this file should be outside your webroot. AuthUserFile /srv/www/user1/.htpasswd AuthType Basic AuthName “Blog” require user youruser #making this username difficult to guess can help mitigate password brute force attacks.</p>
<p>Thanks I have it all working but dont know what the username is or how to set my own.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=MXwb0OW_7vk:fJ8ZycykSXI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=MXwb0OW_7vk:fJ8ZycykSXI:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=MXwb0OW_7vk:fJ8ZycykSXI:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?i=MXwb0OW_7vk:fJ8ZycykSXI:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=MXwb0OW_7vk:fJ8ZycykSXI:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=MXwb0OW_7vk:fJ8ZycykSXI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?i=MXwb0OW_7vk:fJ8ZycykSXI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webrocker</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/comment-page-1#comment-16440</link>
		<dc:creator>Webrocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 07:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/#comment-16440</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I just came across this interesting read about WP's &lt;code&gt;./wp-admin/install.php&lt;/code&gt; posing a veritable hole in case the db-connection fails:

http://perishablepress.com/press/2009/05/05/important-security-fix-for-wordpress/

Cheers and keep up the good work,
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I just came across this interesting read about WP&#8217;s <code>./wp-admin/install.php</code> posing a veritable hole in case the db-connection fails:</p>
<p><a href="http://perishablepress.com/press/2009/05/05/important-security-fix-for-wordpress/" rel="nofollow">http://perishablepress.com/press/2009/05/05/important-security-fix-for-wordpress/</a></p>
<p>Cheers and keep up the good work,<br />
Tom</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=BS1RVz7VuyY:OVkU69zxiJM:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=BS1RVz7VuyY:OVkU69zxiJM:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=BS1RVz7VuyY:OVkU69zxiJM:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?i=BS1RVz7VuyY:OVkU69zxiJM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=BS1RVz7VuyY:OVkU69zxiJM:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?a=BS1RVz7VuyY:OVkU69zxiJM:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/BlogSecNews?i=BS1RVz7VuyY:OVkU69zxiJM:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/comment-page-1#comment-16008</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/#comment-16008</guid>
		<description>Hi Patricia,

I'm not aware of Spambam having problems with sessions in this way. Maybe your php installation isn't configured with sessions? 

If you're sure it is let me know the spambam version and I'll take a look. Spambam is quite old now and I do plan to update when I get chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patricia,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not aware of Spambam having problems with sessions in this way. Maybe your php installation isn&#8217;t configured with sessions? </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re sure it is let me know the spambam version and I&#8217;ll take a look. Spambam is quite old now and I do plan to update when I get chance.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=Uot6RYMr"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=41" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=SE5jMEfC"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=50" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=m4YP498k"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=m4YP498k" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=5RdHFV0a"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=52" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=kuQDkhid"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=kuQDkhid" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/comment-page-1#comment-15990</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/#comment-15990</guid>
		<description>Hi Patricia, it looks like Spambam is trying to use a session when one has already been initialised. 

I've sent Gareth (the author) an email about this but I'd suggest you contact him directly, details here if you continue having problems: 

http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/spambam/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patricia, it looks like Spambam is trying to use a session when one has already been initialised. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve sent Gareth (the author) an email about this but I&#8217;d suggest you contact him directly, details here if you continue having problems: </p>
<p><a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/spambam/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/spambam/</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=qJ0YBR1m"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=41" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=brOIk4rf"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=50" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=1BwyKroG"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=1BwyKroG" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=vjje5Qh1"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=52" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=zClxNPHw"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=zClxNPHw" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/comment-page-1#comment-15989</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/#comment-15989</guid>
		<description>Regarding spambam - about 3 hours ago all of the WP sites I manage who have the spambam plugin installed, started to spit out error messages. Here's an example:

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: open(/home/aborigin/tmp/sess_bc297b661baddbdbc9bafec084c40ae2, O_RDWR) failed: Permission denied (13) in /home/aanraken/public_html/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php on line 188

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/aanraken/public_html/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php:188) in /home/aanraken/public_html/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php on line 188

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/aanraken/public_html/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php:188) in /home/aanraken/public_html/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php on line 188
Warning: Unknown: open(/home/aborigin/tmp/sess_bc297b661baddbdbc9bafec084c40ae2, O_RDWR) failed: Permission denied (13) in Unknown on line 0

Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct () in Unknown on line 0

I've been mailing back and forth with my host to solve this issue, but all they could come up with in the end, was to delete the spambam plugin.

I'm particularly concerned about the first line in de error messages: Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: open(/home/aborigin/tmp/sess_bc297b661baddbdbc9bafec084c40ae2, O_RDWR) failed

/home/aborigin/tmp is not any site of mine...

The versions of WordPress are 2.6.5 and 2.7; the only thing these sites had in common was that they all had spambam activated.

Does anybody here have a clue what happened? 

Thanks in advance,
Patricia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding spambam &#8211; about 3 hours ago all of the WP sites I manage who have the spambam plugin installed, started to spit out error messages. Here&#8217;s an example:</p>
<p>Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: open(/home/aborigin/tmp/sess_bc297b661baddbdbc9bafec084c40ae2, O_RDWR) failed: Permission denied (13) in /home/aanraken/public_html/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php on line 188</p>
<p>Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie &#8211; headers already sent by (output started at /home/aanraken/public_html/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php:188) in /home/aanraken/public_html/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php on line 188</p>
<p>Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter &#8211; headers already sent (output started at /home/aanraken/public_html/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php:188) in /home/aanraken/public_html/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php on line 188<br />
Warning: Unknown: open(/home/aborigin/tmp/sess_bc297b661baddbdbc9bafec084c40ae2, O_RDWR) failed: Permission denied (13) in Unknown on line 0</p>
<p>Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct () in Unknown on line 0</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been mailing back and forth with my host to solve this issue, but all they could come up with in the end, was to delete the spambam plugin.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m particularly concerned about the first line in de error messages: Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: open(/home/aborigin/tmp/sess_bc297b661baddbdbc9bafec084c40ae2, O_RDWR) failed</p>
<p>/home/aborigin/tmp is not any site of mine&#8230;</p>
<p>The versions of WordPress are 2.6.5 and 2.7; the only thing these sites had in common was that they all had spambam activated.</p>
<p>Does anybody here have a clue what happened? </p>
<p>Thanks in advance,<br />
Patricia</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=POEDdPS0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=41" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=j6g8Kzvt"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=50" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=8M6tGB5Q"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=8M6tGB5Q" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=i925h9nv"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=52" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=XNjUW1YJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=XNjUW1YJ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/comment-page-1#comment-15945</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/#comment-15945</guid>
		<description>I've just resolved a number of bugs in wp-scanner, including DNS resolving issues, CSS and the wp-scanner plugin page.

Look out for the new version its coming soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just resolved a number of bugs in wp-scanner, including DNS resolving issues, CSS and the wp-scanner plugin page.</p>
<p>Look out for the new version its coming soon!</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=ysf8enVd"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=41" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=lY9LSjcu"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=50" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=D8Uoo905"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=D8Uoo905" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=GpYSPlBl"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=52" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=HdYP9Lac"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=HdYP9Lac" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/comment-page-1#comment-11613</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/#comment-11613</guid>
		<description>RE: Security in 2.3.3

&lt;blockquote&gt;
1) re 2.3.3 - Is version 2.3.3 secure? Are there any security issues with this version?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
There have been some whispers in the dark so to speak, but no hard evidence that this version is vulnerable, see: http://blogsecurity.net/wordpress/wordpress-231-sql-injection-vulnerability/

&lt;blockquote&gt;
2) re 2.5 - Are the 3 security file updates in the 2.5.1 upgrade only for 2.5? Does the security hole that is fixed in 2.5.1 exist in 2.3.3 as well?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, I believe 2.3.3 is unaffected by some of the recent vulnerabilities in 2.5x.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
3) Can I safely assume that if WordPress’s “Hardening WordPress” procedures
http://codex.wordpress.org/Hardening_WordPress

or BlogSecurity.net’s “How to create a secure WordPress install v1.1″
blogsecurity.net/projects/secure-wp-whitepaper.pdf

are applied that ANY version of WordPress would then be secure?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Applying these guidelines would certainly provide additional layers of security buying you time to apply the needed fixes as they are released, however, it cannot guarantee your security.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
4) It seems that 2.5.1 only has feature enhancements?
Do I have to go with version 2.5.1 for security reasons?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

At the moment a number of people are still using the latest 2.3x branch, however, WordPress does suggest you upgrade to 2.5.1.

Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Security in 2.3.3</p>
<blockquote><p>
1) re 2.3.3 &#8211; Is version 2.3.3 secure? Are there any security issues with this version?
</p></blockquote>
<p>There have been some whispers in the dark so to speak, but no hard evidence that this version is vulnerable, see: <a href="http://blogsecurity.net/wordpress/wordpress-231-sql-injection-vulnerability/" rel="nofollow">http://blogsecurity.net/wordpress/wordpress-231-sql-injection-vulnerability/</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
2) re 2.5 &#8211; Are the 3 security file updates in the 2.5.1 upgrade only for 2.5? Does the security hole that is fixed in 2.5.1 exist in 2.3.3 as well?
</p></blockquote>
<p>No, I believe 2.3.3 is unaffected by some of the recent vulnerabilities in 2.5x.</p>
<blockquote><p>
3) Can I safely assume that if WordPress’s “Hardening WordPress” procedures<br />
<a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Hardening_WordPress" rel="nofollow">http://codex.wordpress.org/Hardening_WordPress</a></p>
<p>or BlogSecurity.net’s “How to create a secure WordPress install v1.1″<br />
blogsecurity.net/projects/secure-wp-whitepaper.pdf</p>
<p>are applied that ANY version of WordPress would then be secure?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Applying these guidelines would certainly provide additional layers of security buying you time to apply the needed fixes as they are released, however, it cannot guarantee your security.</p>
<blockquote><p>
4) It seems that 2.5.1 only has feature enhancements?<br />
Do I have to go with version 2.5.1 for security reasons?
</p></blockquote>
<p>At the moment a number of people are still using the latest 2.3x branch, however, WordPress does suggest you upgrade to 2.5.1.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=6TkOTyHS"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=41" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=dl5mUYOd"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=50" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=srFzGTsH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=srFzGTsH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=kWQ4943b"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=52" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=tk5gwVg6"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=tk5gwVg6" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbiethan</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/comment-page-1#comment-11610</link>
		<dc:creator>jbiethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/#comment-11610</guid>
		<description>Security in 2.3.3

I have several questions regarding security and version 2.3.3.

1) re 2.3.3 - Is version 2.3.3 secure? Are there any security issues with this version?

2) re 2.5 - Are the 3 security file updates in the 2.5.1 upgrade only for 2.5? Does the security hole that is fixed in 2.5.1 exist in 2.3.3 as well?

3) Can I safely assume that if WordPress's "Hardening WordPress" procedures
http://codex.wordpress.org/Hardening_WordPress

or BlogSecurity.net's "How to create a secure WordPress install v1.1"
blogsecurity.net/projects/secure-wp-whitepaper.pdf

are applied that ANY version of WordPress would then be secure?

4) It seems that 2.5.1 only has feature enhancements?
Do I have to go with version 2.5.1 for security reasons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security in 2.3.3</p>
<p>I have several questions regarding security and version 2.3.3.</p>
<p>1) re 2.3.3 &#8211; Is version 2.3.3 secure? Are there any security issues with this version?</p>
<p>2) re 2.5 &#8211; Are the 3 security file updates in the 2.5.1 upgrade only for 2.5? Does the security hole that is fixed in 2.5.1 exist in 2.3.3 as well?</p>
<p>3) Can I safely assume that if WordPress&#8217;s &#8220;Hardening WordPress&#8221; procedures<br />
<a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Hardening_WordPress" rel="nofollow">http://codex.wordpress.org/Hardening_WordPress</a></p>
<p>or BlogSecurity.net&#8217;s &#8220;How to create a secure WordPress install v1.1&#8243;<br />
blogsecurity.net/projects/secure-wp-whitepaper.pdf</p>
<p>are applied that ANY version of WordPress would then be secure?</p>
<p>4) It seems that 2.5.1 only has feature enhancements?<br />
Do I have to go with version 2.5.1 for security reasons?</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=0MoRH1jK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=41" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=QIGBBj7Q"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=50" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=VJcy4rRn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=VJcy4rRn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=5JLAZvV4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=52" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=kl4cqYi3"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=kl4cqYi3" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/comment-page-1#comment-11222</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 18:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/blogsec-news/#comment-11222</guid>
		<description>The WPLite project looks quite cool. Check it out here: http://mahalkita.nanogeex.com/wplite/

Will have to take a look at this in more detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WPLite project looks quite cool. Check it out here: <a href="http://mahalkita.nanogeex.com/wplite/" rel="nofollow">http://mahalkita.nanogeex.com/wplite/</a></p>
<p>Will have to take a look at this in more detail.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=SPkt1gbh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=41" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=RA44lftZ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=50" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=LDFpf7Ka"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=LDFpf7Ka" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=N2kp703F"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?d=52" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?a=M8NOys1M"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/BlogSecNews?i=M8NOys1M" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
