<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Studycafe</title>
	<atom:link href="https://studycafe.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://studycafe.in</link>
	<description>One Stop Solution For CA CS CWA Direct Indirect Tax GST Business News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<xhtml:meta content="noindex" name="robots" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/><item>
		<title>Mere Difference in Trade Creditor Closing Balance Cannot Justify Section 68 Addition When Purchases Are Accepted, Rules ITAT</title>
		<link>https://studycafe.in/mere-difference-in-trade-creditor-closing-balance-cannot-justify-section-68-addition-when-purchases-are-accepted-rules-itat-425700.html</link>
					<comments>https://studycafe.in/mere-difference-in-trade-creditor-closing-balance-cannot-justify-section-68-addition-when-purchases-are-accepted-rules-itat-425700.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saloni Kumari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://studycafe.in/?p=425700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mere Difference in Trade Creditor Closing Balance Cannot Justify Section 68 Addition When Purchases Are Accepted, Rules ITAT The ITAT Delhi Bench has clarified that an addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act cannot be made merely because there is a difference in the closing balance of a trade creditor when the purchases, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://studycafe.in/mere-difference-in-trade-creditor-closing-balance-cannot-justify-section-68-addition-when-purchases-are-accepted-rules-itat-425700.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delayed PF/ESI Deposits Can Be Disallowed During ITR Processing, Holds ITAT</title>
		<link>https://studycafe.in/delayed-pf-esi-deposits-can-be-disallowed-during-itr-processing-holds-itat-425688.html</link>
					<comments>https://studycafe.in/delayed-pf-esi-deposits-can-be-disallowed-during-itr-processing-holds-itat-425688.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saloni Kumari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://studycafe.in/?p=425688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delayed PF/ESI Deposits Can Be Disallowed During ITR Processing, Holds ITAT The ITAT Delhi Bench has delivered a significant ruling in the case of Cico Technologies Limited, clarifying that delayed deposit of employees’ Provident Fund (PF) and Employees’ State Insurance (ESI) contributions can be disallowed while processing the ITR under Section 143(1) of the Income [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://studycafe.in/delayed-pf-esi-deposits-can-be-disallowed-during-itr-processing-holds-itat-425688.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Remands Section 11 Exemption Case After Revenue Fails to Prove Taxpayer’s Engagement in Commercial Activity</title>
		<link>https://studycafe.in/itat-remands-section-11-exemption-case-after-revenue-fails-to-prove-taxpayers-engagement-in-commercial-activity-425679.html</link>
					<comments>https://studycafe.in/itat-remands-section-11-exemption-case-after-revenue-fails-to-prove-taxpayers-engagement-in-commercial-activity-425679.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saloni Kumari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://studycafe.in/?p=425679</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Remands Section 11 Exemption Case After Revenue Fails to Prove Taxpayer&#8217;s Engagement in Commercial Activity The ITAT Delhi Bench remanded the case of a Section 11 exemption claim by an educational institute registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, considering the Revenue&#8217;s failure to submit proper evidence proving that the assessee was [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://studycafe.in/itat-remands-section-11-exemption-case-after-revenue-fails-to-prove-taxpayers-engagement-in-commercial-activity-425679.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Re-Appoints Ravi Agrawal as CBDT Chairman for Six Months</title>
		<link>https://studycafe.in/government-re-appoints-ravi-agrawal-as-cbdt-chairman-for-six-months-425695.html</link>
					<comments>https://studycafe.in/government-re-appoints-ravi-agrawal-as-cbdt-chairman-for-six-months-425695.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanshika verma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBDT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://studycafe.in/?p=425695</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Government Re-Appoints Ravi Agrawal as CBDT Chairman for Six Months The Government of India has approved the re-appointment of Shri Ravi Agrawal as the Chairman of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). The decision was cleared by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC). Shri Ravi Agrawal has been re-appointed on a contract basis [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://studycafe.in/government-re-appoints-ravi-agrawal-as-cbdt-chairman-for-six-months-425695.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Deletes Rs 7 Lakh Section 69A Addition, Says Suspicion Alone Cannot Replace Proof</title>
		<link>https://studycafe.in/itat-deletes-rs-7-lakh-section-69a-addition-says-suspicion-alone-cannot-replace-proof-425654.html</link>
					<comments>https://studycafe.in/itat-deletes-rs-7-lakh-section-69a-addition-says-suspicion-alone-cannot-replace-proof-425654.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saloni Kumari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Mumbai]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://studycafe.in/?p=425654</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Deletes Rs 7 Lakh Section 69A Addition, Says Suspicion Alone Cannot Replace Proof The ITAT Mumbai deleted the Rs 7 lakh addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, holding that the assessee&#8217;s explanation for the cash, supported by confirmations and bank records, was satisfactory. It ruled that suspicion alone cannot justify an [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://studycafe.in/itat-deletes-rs-7-lakh-section-69a-addition-says-suspicion-alone-cannot-replace-proof-425654.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Recovery Must First Target Company: High Court Finds Existing Protection Sufficient and Dismisses Plea</title>
		<link>https://studycafe.in/tax-recovery-must-first-target-company-high-court-finds-existing-protection-sufficient-and-dismisses-plea-425618.html</link>
					<comments>https://studycafe.in/tax-recovery-must-first-target-company-high-court-finds-existing-protection-sufficient-and-dismisses-plea-425618.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saloni Kumari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://studycafe.in/?p=425618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tax Recovery Must First Target Company: High Court Finds Existing Protection Sufficient and Dismisses Plea The Bombay High Court, in a recent significant ruling, dismissed a writ petition filed by Madhavi Kerkar, finding no merit in it. The court says that the petitioner has already been granted enough protection in the present matter. In the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://studycafe.in/tax-recovery-must-first-target-company-high-court-finds-existing-protection-sufficient-and-dismisses-plea-425618.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Rules Stamp Duty Value to Be Considered at Allotment Date under Section 56(2)(x)</title>
		<link>https://studycafe.in/itat-rules-stamp-duty-value-to-be-considered-at-allotment-date-under-section-562x-425590.html</link>
					<comments>https://studycafe.in/itat-rules-stamp-duty-value-to-be-considered-at-allotment-date-under-section-562x-425590.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saloni Kumari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Mumbai]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://studycafe.in/?p=425590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Rules Stamp Duty Value to Be Considered at Allotment Date under Section 56(2)(x) The ITAT Mumbai held in favour of Purvi Nihal Shah (appellant/assessee). The CIT(A)&#8217;s order is quashed, and the case is remanded to the concerned tax authorities (AO) for fresh verification, holding that under Section 56(2)(x), stamp duty value on the date [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://studycafe.in/itat-rules-stamp-duty-value-to-be-considered-at-allotment-date-under-section-562x-425590.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Remands Section 80GGC Donation Case for Fresh Hearing Due to Non-Consideration of Case on Its Merits</title>
		<link>https://studycafe.in/itat-remands-section-80ggc-donation-case-for-fresh-hearing-due-to-non-consideration-of-case-on-its-merits-425569.html</link>
					<comments>https://studycafe.in/itat-remands-section-80ggc-donation-case-for-fresh-hearing-due-to-non-consideration-of-case-on-its-merits-425569.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saloni Kumari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Mumbai]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://studycafe.in/?p=425569</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Remands Section 80GGC Donation Case for Fresh Hearing Due to Non-Consideration of Case on Its Merits The ITAT Mumbai remanded the case of a bogus exemption claim under Section 80GGC on the donations made to a political party. The tribunal held that the lower appellate authority had dismissed the appeal of Sarika Ravka merely [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://studycafe.in/itat-remands-section-80ggc-donation-case-for-fresh-hearing-due-to-non-consideration-of-case-on-its-merits-425569.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Financial Changes From July 1, 2026: What You Need to Know</title>
		<link>https://studycafe.in/financial-changes-from-july-1-2026-what-you-need-to-know-425645.html</link>
					<comments>https://studycafe.in/financial-changes-from-july-1-2026-what-you-need-to-know-425645.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanshika verma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://studycafe.in/?p=425645</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Financial Changes From July 1, 2026: What You Need to Know July 1, 2026 will bring with it a number of new financial regulations. These changes will have an impact on taxpayers, bank customers, credit card users, passport applicants and Aadhaar holders. 1. Income Tax Return (ITR) Filing Final Date The last date to file [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://studycafe.in/financial-changes-from-july-1-2026-what-you-need-to-know-425645.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Sets Aside Ex Parte Order Due to Delivery of Notices to a Wrong Email Service; Remands Case for Fresh Hearing</title>
		<link>https://studycafe.in/itat-sets-aside-ex-parte-order-due-to-delivery-of-notices-to-a-wrong-email-service-remands-case-for-fresh-hearing-425558.html</link>
					<comments>https://studycafe.in/itat-sets-aside-ex-parte-order-due-to-delivery-of-notices-to-a-wrong-email-service-remands-case-for-fresh-hearing-425558.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saloni Kumari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Mumbai]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://studycafe.in/?p=425558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Sets Aside Ex Parte Order Due to Delivery of Notices to a Wrong Email Service; Remands Case for Fresh Hearing The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, held in favour of the taxpayer, Sadik Ali Shaikh, by remanding the case to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The tribunal observed that the case was not [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://studycafe.in/itat-sets-aside-ex-parte-order-due-to-delivery-of-notices-to-a-wrong-email-service-remands-case-for-fresh-hearing-425558.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>