<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346</id><updated>2012-05-29T11:10:29.208+10:00</updated><category term="Peer" /><category term="ethics" /><category term="shares" /><category term="iselect" /><category term="ANZAC" /><category term="pirates" /><category term="term" /><category term="Social democrats" /><category term="customer satisfaction" /><category term="Marx" /><category term="Keynes" /><category term="Occupiers" /><category term="transport" /><category term="Kerr" /><category term="telecommunications policy" /><category term="books" /><category term="NBN" /><category term="3D printing" /><category term="Bitcoin" /><category term="Gillard" /><category term="Digital Economy" /><category term="convergence" /><category term="Lang" /><category term="MTAS" /><category term="Cerf" /><category term="Quadrant" /><category term="Ayn Rand" /><category term="Israel" /><category term="Apple" /><category term="Ergas" /><category term="Shanahan" /><category term="ComCom" /><category term="Bartholomeusz" /><category term="Hitchens" /><category term="Breakfast Politics" /><category term="Galbraith" /><category term="sudoku" /><category term="marketing;  tourism" /><category term="ABS" /><category term="Railway" /><category term="Thodey" /><category term="Wilkie" /><category term="University" /><category term="Gittins" /><category term="Conversation" /><category term="TIO" /><category term="WiMAX" /><category term="Today Tonight" /><category term="Lizzies" /><category term="NBN Co" /><category term="Huawei" /><category term="Communications Day" /><category term="facebook" /><category term="Rugby" /><category term="IPv6" /><category term="Copper" /><category term="On-line Opinion" /><category term="Bligh" /><category term="Lampe" /><category term="jesus" /><category term="feminism" /><category term="Richardson" /><category term="anti-trust" /><category term="Pipes" /><category term="left" /><category term="brain" /><category term="NotW" /><category term="Abbott" /><category term="faith" /><category term="MySpace" /><category term="relativism" /><category term="UK" /><category term="mobiles" /><category term="Hawke" /><category term="Menzies" /><category term="Tanner" /><category term="patents" /><category term="Rudd" /><category term="VoIP" /><category term="carbon" /><category term="Shoppies" /><category term="ATT" /><category term="Stokes" /><category term="Alcatel" /><category term="migrants" /><category term="BTCE" /><category term="innovation" /><category term="negroponte" /><category term="RTIRC" /><category term="Labour market" /><category term="Bradfield" /><category term="Hitler" /><category term="statistics" /><category term="republic" /><category term="Albanese" /><category term="new zealand" /><category term="Column 8" /><category term="gay marriage" /><category term="Hockey" /><category term="Howard" /><category term="confusopoly" /><category term="Microsoft" /><category term="Quiggin" /><category term="democracy" /><category term="Productivity Commission" /><category term="BOF" /><category term="Voting" /><category term="Lehrer" /><category term="Earthquake" /><category term="AIIA" /><category term="tobacco" /><category term="vividwireless" /><category term="Keneally" /><category term="Libertarianism" /><category term="Generation C" /><category term="military" /><category term="Simpson" /><category term="Alston" /><category term="pangram" /><category term="Devine" /><category term="competition policy" /><category term="7pm project" /><category term="ISP" /><category term="The Conversation" /><category term="porn" /><category term="Lundy" /><category term="Digital Dividend" /><category term="Media Watch" /><category term="Mathematics" /><category term="Gestetner" /><category term="shareholder value" /><category term="Conroy" /><category term="computer" /><category term="AAPT" /><category term="Nash" /><category term="Averages" /><category term="Obama" /><category term="behavioural economics" /><category term="Robertson" /><category term="FCC" /><category term="Telecom" /><category term="productivity" /><category term="HSC" /><category term="ICT" /><category term="ABC" /><category term="Blount" /><category term="feyerabend" /><category term="News Corp" /><category term="oligarch" /><category term="HP" /><category term="fundamentalism" /><category term="Cavalier" /><category term="ACM" /><category term="radio" /><category term="bible" /><category term="VHA" /><category term="IIA" /><category term="VET" /><category term="justice" /><category term="Jobs" /><category term="socialist objective" /><category term="NewsCorp" /><category term="OECD" /><category term="e-books" /><category term="kimmic" /><category term="fibre" /><category term="Bozza" /><category term="property rights" /><category term="Institutionalism" /><category term="Corporation" /><category term="Google" /><category term="libraries" /><category term="unions" /><category term="networks" /><category term="Internode" /><category term="Swan" /><category term="m" /><category term="Burgess" /><category term="Trujillo" /><category term="Keating" /><category term="copyright" /><category term="McKnight" /><category term="PMG" /><category term="Turnbull" /><category term="Roskam" /><category term="ACCC" /><category term="Public Relations" /><category term="twitter" /><category term="GFC" /><category term="Fairfax" /><category term="golden rule" /><category term="CEDA" /><category term="data retention" /><category term="Putnam" /><category term="social media" /><category term="Ferguson" /><category term="Fukuyama" /><category term="telco" /><category term="Xenophon" /><category term="Australia Post" /><category term="calendar" /><category term="Bloomberg" /><category term="curriculum" /><category term="DNS" /><category term="ACMA" /><category term="DigEcon Research" /><category term="light" /><category term="Optus" /><category term="Quigley" /><category term="Australian Government" /><category term="ITIF" /><category term="Pope" /><category term="Bobbitt" /><category term="Four Corners" /><category term="game theory" /><category term="grant" /><category term="heterodox economics" /><category term="Seven" /><category term="Murdoch" /><category term="library" /><category term="ERR" /><category term="truthers" /><category term="RSS" /><category term="itNews" /><category term="Unauthorised Arrivals" /><category term="Chirgwin" /><category term="cluetrain" /><category term="refugees" /><category term="GPT" /><category term="IPA" /><category term="NZ" /><category term="Higher Education" /><category term="Marketing" /><category term="Brandis" /><category term="Obeid" /><category term="MFP; Ergas" /><category term="Canada" /><category term="Fosters" /><category term="Sydney Grammar" /><category term="ATUG" /><category term="Gans" /><category term="blogs" /><category term="ALP" /><category term="encyclopaedias" /><category term="constitution" /><category term="Jones" /><category term="Bolt" /><category term="The Beatles" /><category term="Whitlam" /><category term="terror" /><category term="Cattle" /><category term="logic" /><category term="Harvey Norman" /><category term="spectrum" /><category term="Moore's Law" /><category term="netregistry" /><category term="Telstra" /><category term="Eurovision" /><category term="Chatswood" /><category term="ZDnet" /><category term="climate change" /><category term="Rhiannon" /><category term="Papworth" /><category term="Hagans" /><category term="regulation" /><category term="USO" /><category term="Wild Men of Sydney" /><category term="SBS" /><category term="LTE" /><category term="singularity" /><category term="Kuhn" /><category term="Indy 500" /><category term="Qantas" /><category term="Reform" /><category term="architecture" /><category term="lobbying" /><category term="Pearl" /><category term="Gov 2.0" /><category term="capitalism" /><category term="Bushby" /><category term="North West" /><category term="Communications Alliance" /><category term="Gambling" /><category term="media" /><category term="transplants" /><category term="OWS" /><category term="Wallabies; Rugby" /><category term="firm" /><category term="coalition" /><category term="Epping" /><category term="Henderson" /><category term="BCA" /><category term="Askew" /><category term="DBCDE" /><category term="washminster" /><category term="ACCAN" /><category term="Irvine" /><category term="Joyce" /><category term="Asher" /><category term="Basel Convention" /><category term="MBA" /><category term="Australian Democrats" /><category term="Sheehan" /><category term="Hayek" /><category term="complexity" /><category term="gobbers" /><category term="Christian" /><category term="CPRF" /><category term="senate" /><category term="USA" /><category term="Vodafone" /><category term="SRC" /><category term="Robespierre" /><category term="West Australian" /><category term="Communications" /><category term="Burke" /><category term="internet" /><category term="Social inclusion; social exclusion" /><category term="Perkins" /><category term="right" /><category term="smartphones" /><category term="broadcasting" /><category term="Watson" /><category term="Hapsburg" /><category term="science" /><category term="The Economist" /><category term="Islam" /><category term="atheist" /><category term="QandA" /><category term="Samuel" /><category term="financial crisis" /><category term="Morgan" /><category term="diplomacy" /><category term="conspiracy" /><category term="Physics" /><category term="politics" /><category term="Glacier" /><category term="Mark Antony" /><category term="Crikey" /><category term="broadband" /><category term="Culture" /><category term="YouTube" /><category term="ASIC" /><category term="volcano" /><category term="Latham" /><category term="ID" /><category term="conservatives" /><category term="Mosaic" /><category term="Duffy" /><category term="Liberals" /><category term="terrorists" /><category term="Communism" /><category term="Greiner" /><category term="economics" /><category term="Friedman" /><category term="neo-liberalism" /><category term="history" /><category term="Cooper's Law" /><category term="religion" /><category term="intellectual propery" /><category term="Lynch" /><category term="public policy" /><category term="Osama bib Laden" /><category term="Milne" /><category term="Oz" /><category term="Fergusson" /><category term="Faulkner" /><category term="Pirate Party" /><category term="Grubb" /><category term="Double Dissolution" /><title type="text">Anything Goes</title><subtitle type="html">Random thoughts (when I get around to it) on politics and public discourse by David Havyatt.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1070</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/CUEA" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="blogspot/cuea" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-8483989926784500293</id><published>2012-05-13T14:16:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2012-05-13T14:16:58.683+10:00</updated><title type="text">Abbott and language</title><summary type="text">This has been an amazing week.

At least the SMH got it right in yesterday's editorial when they noted the absence of anything amounting to policy.  Senator Conroy's media releases covered the NBN bit.

The SMH however saw fit to say nice things about the Abbott commitment to teaching foreign languages.  I won't here go into the fact that such teaching would be advanced by the NBN. The question </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/8483989926784500293/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=8483989926784500293&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/8483989926784500293" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/8483989926784500293" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2012/05/this-has-been-amazing-week.html" title="Abbott and language" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-6279232576798957766</id><published>2012-05-10T17:08:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2012-05-10T17:08:03.207+10:00</updated><title type="text">Reporting the "news"</title><summary type="text">If Chicken Little runs around and says "The sky is falling" it could be reported in three ways.

The first way would be "The sky is falling".  This would be inaccurate.

The second would be "Today Chicken Little claimed that the sky is falling."  This would be a completely accurate report but of little value.

The third would be "Today Chicken Little lied.  Little claimed that the sky is falling.</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/6279232576798957766/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=6279232576798957766&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/6279232576798957766" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/6279232576798957766" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2012/05/reporting-news.html" title="Reporting the &quot;news&quot;" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-5951739002331167876</id><published>2012-01-27T21:17:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2012-01-27T21:17:11.901+10:00</updated><title type="text">The Liberals and Indigenous Australians</title><summary type="text">So that's twice in recent times the Labor PM has saved the Opposition Leader from the consequence of a gaffe over indigenous affairs.  

The first was Kevin Rudd helping Brendon Nelson over the disaster that was his address in the Apology by going across the chamber to get Nelson to accompany the elders into the Parliament.

Then yesterday we had Julia Gillard ensuring her security detail </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/5951739002331167876/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=5951739002331167876&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/5951739002331167876" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/5951739002331167876" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2012/01/liberals-and-indigenous-australians.html" title="The Liberals and Indigenous Australians" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-1083852930096647564</id><published>2012-01-23T13:21:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2012-01-23T13:21:34.440+10:00</updated><title type="text">Kodak</title><summary type="text">Anyone observing the latest chapter in the Kodak story would do well to read Clayton Christiansen's The Innovator's Dilemma.

Kodak, you see, invented digital photography but didn't invest for fear of cannibalising the film business.  This the only technology choice where this occurred.

There ought to be a saying somewhere, if you don't cannibalise your own business you will just end up road </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/1083852930096647564/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=1083852930096647564&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/1083852930096647564" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/1083852930096647564" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2012/01/kodak.html" title="Kodak" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-949601241984096195</id><published>2012-01-12T17:52:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2012-01-12T17:52:22.455+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Libertarianism" /><title type="text">Not Blogging Really</title><summary type="text">Anyone in Australia thinking of the idea of primaries should take a bit of a look at what happens in the US.

This ad is run by Newt Ginrich to destroy the credibility of Mitt Romney.



But Ron Paul goes one better and just attacks Newt and Mitt.



But when you follow these links you find a really monumental pro-Ron Paul piece which argues that a non-interventionist Foreign Policy as proposed </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/949601241984096195/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=949601241984096195&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/949601241984096195" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/949601241984096195" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2012/01/not-blogging-really.html" title="Not Blogging Really" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/IGqtLvPk6mo/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-1117446357574009092</id><published>2011-12-31T16:42:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-12-31T16:42:40.376+10:00</updated><title type="text">The Iron Lady - Verdict</title><summary type="text">The Iron Lady is a disappointing film, but not for all the reasons outlined in John Huxley's column today.

It wasn't merely "revisionism", and the long-term effect of Thatcher on Britain is something on which rational intelligent informed people could disagree.  Far from being toned down "Thatcherism" it demonstrated how her downfall within her own party was determined by th excesses to which </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/1117446357574009092/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=1117446357574009092&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/1117446357574009092" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/1117446357574009092" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/12/iron-lady-verdict.html" title="The Iron Lady - Verdict" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-2493146185642077116</id><published>2011-12-09T08:03:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-12-09T08:03:28.536+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Conroy" /><title type="text">To my loyal reader(s)</title><summary type="text">As reported in CommsDay today I will be commencing a gig as Temporary Special Adviser to Senator Conroy starting Monday.

Writing a blog is inconsistent with the role.  While some of my esoteric pieces on the nature of religion, the global sweep of history and heterodox economics might be legitimate independent comment, those who know me well know I would find it hard not to stray.

It does leave</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/2493146185642077116/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=2493146185642077116&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/2493146185642077116" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/2493146185642077116" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/12/to-my-loyal-readers.html" title="To my loyal reader(s)" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-209538519795847313</id><published>2011-12-07T15:15:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-12-07T15:15:07.610+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Gittins" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Corporation" /><title type="text">The Corporation - Part 2</title><summary type="text">Nice little piece  today from Ross Gittins on suggestions for a "relational business charter".  

In part it goes to the same territory as my comments on the corporation. But only in part.  

The question is more how would you get firm's to pursue the objectives given the myth of "maximising returns".  The answer is more that the public policy debate needs a better understanding of the role of </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/209538519795847313/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=209538519795847313&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/209538519795847313" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/209538519795847313" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/12/corporation-part-2.html" title="The Corporation - Part 2" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-2342558313352802417</id><published>2011-12-07T14:55:00.001+10:00</published><updated>2011-12-07T14:58:41.576+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="heterodox economics" /><title type="text">Heterodoxy Unbound</title><summary type="text">I have spent the last two days at the conference of the Australian Society of Heterodox Economists.

The conference re-established a core point - the heterodox are united by what they stand against rather than what they stand for.

What they stand against is the dominant paradigm of the neo-classical core of economics.  But even how much they stand against this varies.

Universally they would </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/2342558313352802417/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=2342558313352802417&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/2342558313352802417" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/2342558313352802417" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/12/heterodoxy-unbound.html" title="Heterodoxy Unbound" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-2300072242328123186</id><published>2011-12-07T08:44:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-12-07T08:44:13.445+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="University" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Abbott" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SRC" /><title type="text">Weird comments</title><summary type="text">I just moderated a weird comment on a post about the University of Sydney rebranding.

The comment made reference to a supposed "secret society" called the "Integralia."  Further research has thrown up a short item in Honi Soit that provides good evidence that the existence of the society is an organised hoax.

The hoax is centred on its own wikispace and seems to be actively centred on a </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/2300072242328123186/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=2300072242328123186&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/2300072242328123186" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/2300072242328123186" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/12/weird-comments.html" title="Weird comments" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-3568012796286873664</id><published>2011-12-01T08:15:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-12-01T08:15:18.474+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Canada" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Digital Economy" /><title type="text">Update on Canada</title><summary type="text">Thanks to Catherine Middleton for alerting me that the story on easing foreign ownership restrictions in Canada is premature.

The relevant Minister did indicate that change is underway but will not be unveiled till 2012.

He interestingly is reported to have said "the government expects cellphone companies to offer rural Canadians the same services as those living in cities."  Canada faces the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/3568012796286873664/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=3568012796286873664&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/3568012796286873664" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/3568012796286873664" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/12/update-on-canada.html" title="Update on Canada" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-6198698049818456282</id><published>2011-11-30T10:47:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-30T10:47:22.955+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Gillard" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Rudd" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="right" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="left" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ALP" /><title type="text">Kevin Rudd and the Right on the ALP</title><summary type="text">Launching yet another book on the current malaise of the ALP Kevin Rudd has provided his own analysis.  Much of this is confused, and what he calls for is indistinct.

He starts by asserting a distinction between Labor good and the other side evil as;

A Party that has painted most of the nation’s history on a wide and expansive canvas; its economic reforms, its social innovation, the centrality </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/6198698049818456282/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=6198698049818456282&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/6198698049818456282" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/6198698049818456282" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/kevin-rudd-and-right-on-alp.html" title="Kevin Rudd and the Right on the ALP" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-8618022761440464481</id><published>2011-11-29T11:41:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-29T11:41:15.489+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Corporation" /><title type="text">The Corporation</title><summary type="text">In my many and varied writings there is one issue that is central, and that I very seldom discuss directly.  That issue is an understanding of the Corporation as an economic and political institution.  My understanding of the Corporation informs my overall "socialist" bent - wherein I read the "socialisation of the means of production etc" to not mean social ownership but directed to social not </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/8618022761440464481/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=8618022761440464481&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/8618022761440464481" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/8618022761440464481" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/corporation.html" title="The Corporation" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-6658040288842801447</id><published>2011-11-29T09:11:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-29T09:11:01.400+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Digital Dividend" /><title type="text">Canada and mobiles/wireless</title><summary type="text">An interesting report today that the Canadian Government is considering reducing the restrictions on foreign ownership of telcos.

The article neatly points out how the current ownership limit would impede new entrants into the market.  The discussion has some relevance to the yet to be undertaken (or revealed) analysis of competition limits to apply to the Australian Digital Dividend spectrum </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/6658040288842801447/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=6658040288842801447&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/6658040288842801447" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/6658040288842801447" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/canada-and-mobileswireless.html" title="Canada and mobiles/wireless" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-7716815412449843099</id><published>2011-11-25T09:43:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-25T09:43:39.607+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Fairfax" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NBN Co" /><title type="text">The NBN and the phone service</title><summary type="text">Fascinating item in the AFR today (behind paywall) in which the new chief executive of Primus rants about the need for the NBN to do more for phone service.

According to this CEO the NBN only provides for one telephone and to get the existing telephones to work requires "extensive rewiring".  That to me is complete and utter nonsense.  From the ATA part of the NTU the customer gets exactly the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/7716815412449843099/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=7716815412449843099&amp;isPopup=true" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/7716815412449843099" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/7716815412449843099" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/nbn-and-phone-service.html" title="The NBN and the phone service" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-7629954860095097865</id><published>2011-11-23T17:37:00.001+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-24T00:23:22.379+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Telstra" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Australia Post" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NBN Co" /><title type="text">Australia Post and the Digital Economy UPDATED</title><summary type="text">Since Maha Krishnapillai announced that he was leaving Optus everyone has been wondering "where is he going?"  We were only told it was a commercial role in a non-competing organisation.  Today it has been revealed in CommsDay that he is off to Australia Post.  

It was an interesting way to find out - given that the only other news coverage in the AFR and The Register seems to also have been </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/7629954860095097865/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=7629954860095097865&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/7629954860095097865" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/7629954860095097865" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/australia-post-and-digital-economy.html" title="Australia Post and the Digital Economy UPDATED" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-381631264037354810</id><published>2011-11-16T08:59:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-16T08:59:14.858+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Gittins" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Digital Economy" /><title type="text">The Digital Economy, Globalisation and Change</title><summary type="text">I gave this paper at CPRF 2011 last week on Competition Policy for the Digital Economy.  My core thesis was that policy makers refer to "competition" as a policy goal with little understanding, and what understanding they do have needs to change.

The paper traces the evolution of "competition policy" from its anti-monopolisation US origins, through the regulatory state of the post-Depression (</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/381631264037354810/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=381631264037354810&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/381631264037354810" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/381631264037354810" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/digital-economy-globalisation-and.html" title="The Digital Economy, Globalisation and Change" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-2021076757768124590</id><published>2011-11-14T09:29:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-14T09:29:32.685+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Gittins" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Labour market" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unions" /><title type="text">Regulation or Deregulation</title><summary type="text">I reckon everyone who talks about deregulation of the Labor market should read this Ross Gittins piece.

As he says;

Here's the point: the labour market has always been highly regulated. It remained highly regulated under Work Choices and it's still highly regulated under Fair Work. It's always likely to stay highly regulated for a simple reason: unlike all other markets, the labour market deals</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/2021076757768124590/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=2021076757768124590&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/2021076757768124590" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/2021076757768124590" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/regulation-or-deregulation.html" title="Regulation or Deregulation" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-5513584710822859560</id><published>2011-11-13T14:02:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-13T14:02:56.446+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Gillard" /><title type="text">PM's Armistice Day Address</title><summary type="text">I had the opportunity to attend the Armistice Day ceremony at the Australian War Memorial on Friday (at the same time as my number two daughter was on a battlefields tour where her great grandfather Walder fought in WWI).  

I finalised the iTnews column by e-mail from my phone just before it started - and would like to think that one day I could write a speech as good as the one the PM delivered</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/5513584710822859560/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=5513584710822859560&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/5513584710822859560" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/5513584710822859560" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/pms-armistice-day-address.html" title="PM's Armistice Day Address" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-5717638324371453944</id><published>2011-11-13T13:45:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-13T13:45:07.994+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Digital Dividend" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ACMA" /><title type="text">Digital Dividend Auction</title><summary type="text">My column for iTnews this week is based on the ACMA's Digital Dividend Spectrum Tune-Up.

In it I use some data put up by DBCDE to speculate on the values that will be raised at auction.  You might recall that I estimated the $A equivalent for the French 2.5 GHz auction at $458M.  I also noted the Italian 700MHz equivalent raised abiout 2 and a half times as much. 

These are consistent with the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/5717638324371453944/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=5717638324371453944&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/5717638324371453944" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/5717638324371453944" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/digital-dividend-auction.html" title="Digital Dividend Auction" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-6395739822031901268</id><published>2011-11-03T15:47:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-03T15:47:36.551+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ComCom" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="broadband" /><title type="text">The Future with High Speed Broadband</title><summary type="text">The Commerce Commission in New Zealand is an interesting regulator. They have an "inquiring mind" and like to think about the future and what the emerging issues could be.  

This contrasts with so much of Australia's policy and regulatory bodies who merely react to events. 

The ComCom's latest foray is their study of High Speed Broadband Services: Demand side studies

Commissioner Ross </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/6395739822031901268/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=6395739822031901268&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/6395739822031901268" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/6395739822031901268" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/future-with-high-speed-broadband.html" title="The Future with High Speed Broadband" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/EG41p5IcepQ/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-1894658257664406979</id><published>2011-11-02T09:34:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-02T09:34:31.567+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Qantas" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Gillard" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Hockey" /><title type="text">More on Qantas</title><summary type="text">As accusations flow about when people were told of the Qantas lock-out it is pretty clear that Joyce was so obsessed with the security risk that he never really made it clear to the Government.  Ultimately he was speaking in code.

But Joe Hockey reckons;

(Qantas has) been saying it around parliament house for the last few weeks.  They've been saying it privately and publicly around parliament </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/1894658257664406979/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=1894658257664406979&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/1894658257664406979" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/1894658257664406979" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/11/more-on-qantas.html" title="More on Qantas" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-3867156966097273248</id><published>2011-10-31T16:05:00.001+10:00</published><updated>2011-10-31T16:15:49.665+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ATUG" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ICT" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AIIA" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="IIA" /><title type="text">Australia's Shrinking ICT Policy Engagement</title><summary type="text">It is really quite hard to come to grips with exactly what has been happening in the ICT lobbying space over recent years.  Australia had three groups with a policy focus in the ICT space.

The user side was represented by the Australian Telecommunications Users Group (ATUG) which this year celebrated its 3oth anniversary by closing its doors.  The charitable interpretation was that the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/3867156966097273248/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=3867156966097273248&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/3867156966097273248" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/3867156966097273248" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/10/australias-shrinking-ict-policy.html" title="Australia's Shrinking ICT Policy Engagement" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-2383427651025697207</id><published>2011-10-31T14:59:00.000+10:00</published><updated>2011-10-31T14:59:58.252+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Abbott" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Turnbull" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NBN" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Joyce" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ALP" /><title type="text">NBN Confusion</title><summary type="text">The coalition doesn't like the NBN - we know that.  Malcolm Turnbull, Paul Fletcher and Barnaby Joyce go on about it.

But coalition backbenchers don't like the NBN - because residents don't know when they are getting it.  Government backbenchers have also been known to complain about the inadequate roll-out schedule.

The public in general really wonders if the coalition can "stop the NBN."  </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/2383427651025697207/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=2383427651025697207&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/2383427651025697207" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/2383427651025697207" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/10/nbn-confusion.html" title="NBN Confusion" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4081346.post-6308472611181019740</id><published>2011-10-31T12:08:00.001+10:00</published><updated>2011-10-31T12:08:47.744+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="patents" /><title type="text">On patents</title><summary type="text">Stumbled upon this blurb for a book on patents.  looks to be worth a read if I had time......


Novae Meridianae Demetae Dexter delenda est</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/feeds/6308472611181019740/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4081346&amp;postID=6308472611181019740&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/6308472611181019740" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4081346/posts/default/6308472611181019740" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://davidhavyatt.blogspot.com/2011/10/on-patents.html" title="On patents" /><author><name>David Havyatt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10843396871891422509</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="22" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_eYZYNov9puA/S2IfdP8tndI/AAAAAAAAAAM/lxDPexM_j-w/S220/DavidHavyatt03.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>

