<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;C0UNRns-fip7ImA9WhRUFE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756</id><updated>2012-01-24T10:54:57.556-08:00</updated><category term="android" /><category term="running" /><category term="republicans" /><category term="fireworks" /><category term="wired" /><category term="democrats" /><category term="tablet" /><category term="politics" /><category term="text bug" /><category term="portal" /><category term="app" /><category term="ipad" /><category term="games" /><category term="environment" /><category term="xbox" /><category term="fail" /><category term="adobe" /><category term="maps" /><category term="data" /><category term="rant" /><category term="ux design" /><category term="convention" /><title>blog64</title><subtitle type="html">David Stewart's Blog</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>142</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/DmCQm" /><feedburner:info uri="blogspot/dmcqm" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU8GSXgyfip7ImA9WhRQGUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-9215098204905142017</id><published>2011-12-15T14:31:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-15T16:03:48.696-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-15T16:03:48.696-08:00</app:edited><title>Infographics and The War on Data</title><summary>There are few things I hate more in the world than Fox News and Infographics. Although my dislike comes from different things, they both share a common disregard for representing data and in fact, do many things that actively work against the truths that lie in data.

Let's start with Fox News.

I'll just set aside all the misinformation and hate they spew and the entire novel one could right on </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/9215098204905142017/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=9215098204905142017" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/9215098204905142017?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/9215098204905142017?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/aHFjB0syLEc/infographics-and-war-on-data.html" title="Infographics and The War on Data" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eIOxA6J4yhs/Tup1iKRzr1I/AAAAAAAAAnw/N0zIfXZghZM/s72-c/lie_with_statistics.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2011/12/infographics-and-war-on-data.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUYCQXs-cSp7ImA9WhRQGEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-492938934603615813</id><published>2011-12-11T20:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-14T06:32:40.559-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-14T06:32:40.559-08:00</app:edited><title>The REAL Reason for the Season</title><summary>As I entered Sunset Presbyterian Church this morning the sound of our music ministry filled the halls. I love this team. They rock. Seriously. Jay McKinney and his team along with the amazing production of Janet Fraser never fail to reach my heart and move me in profound ways. 
However, this morning something made me roll my eyes. O Come, O Come Emanuel. Not another Christmas service. Ugh.
This </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/492938934603615813/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=492938934603615813" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/492938934603615813?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/492938934603615813?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/pxPbgzu8WHY/real-reason-for-season.html" title="The REAL Reason for the Season" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>4</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2011/12/real-reason-for-season.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0MNR308eip7ImA9WhRXFE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-5640127419460768003</id><published>2011-12-07T10:05:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-20T15:58:16.372-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-20T15:58:16.372-08:00</app:edited><title>"Working From Home" Without the Air Quotes</title><summary>

The Crew


Yesterday I worked from home. No, I didn't "work from home". I flat out worked. Like a mad man. If I list out the things I accomplished it's kind of mind blowing:



Combed through pages and pages of user interview notes to find tasks for a mental models exercise.
Conference call with sales to iron out some SOW issues.
Caulked the bathroom sink.
Hung Christmas lights in the front </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/5640127419460768003/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=5640127419460768003" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/5640127419460768003?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/5640127419460768003?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/IivSbYtt3PE/working-home-without-air-quotes.html" title="&quot;Working From Home&quot; Without the Air Quotes" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pvkIMrq64ro/TuFZV7WvzLI/AAAAAAAAAnM/4i96xix6RXs/s72-c/Screen+Shot+2011-12-08+at+4.42.48+PM.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2011/12/working-home-without-air-quotes.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEUFRHw4eCp7ImA9WhZaEk0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-7670622214725769779</id><published>2011-06-27T13:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-06-27T13:23:35.230-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-06-27T13:23:35.230-07:00</app:edited><title>This was supposed to be a comment on How Gadgets Are Ruining Cars</title><summary>This started out as a simple comment on this post by Gizmodo. After a few paragraphs I decided I should just blog it:

I drive a 1964 Buick Skylark. No power windows or doors, no gps, no fuel injection or electronic ignition or air bags. Even the one luxury it does have, power steering, is not like the speed sensitive stuff you have on modern cars. It will kill you if you aren't careful.

It's a </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/7670622214725769779/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=7670622214725769779" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/7670622214725769779?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/7670622214725769779?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/Q235vuOywf8/this-was-supposed-to-be-comment-on-how.html" title="This was supposed to be a comment on How Gadgets Are Ruining Cars" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2011/06/this-was-supposed-to-be-comment-on-how.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A08GR3k8cCp7ImA9WhZUGUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-6184922988492687738</id><published>2011-06-13T11:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-06-13T11:30:26.778-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-06-13T11:30:26.778-07:00</app:edited><title>From the Webtrends Blog: Data Makes Everything Better</title><summary>

</summary><link rel="related" href="http://blogs.webtrends.com/blog/2011/05/25/data-makes-everything-better/" title="From the Webtrends Blog: Data Makes Everything Better" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/6184922988492687738/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=6184922988492687738" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/6184922988492687738?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/6184922988492687738?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/IxYdYJnnqVc/from-webtrends-blog-data-makes.html" title="From the Webtrends Blog: Data Makes Everything Better" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-v9aNKJgkcqM/TfZXDnzBSSI/AAAAAAAAAcs/xRKYGcwpc_I/s72-c/ms-files.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2011/06/from-webtrends-blog-data-makes.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0MMQ3kzeip7ImA9WhZUGUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-1826996181781574926</id><published>2011-06-13T11:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-06-13T11:24:42.782-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-06-13T11:24:42.782-07:00</app:edited><title>Analytics 10: Design Process</title><summary>With the release of Analytics 10, the culmination of over a year's worth of work, I blogged about our design process.

Analytics 10 Part 2: The Design Process</summary><link rel="related" href="http://blogs.webtrends.com/blog/2011/05/05/analytics-10-part-2-design-process/" title="Analytics 10: Design Process" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/1826996181781574926/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=1826996181781574926" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/1826996181781574926?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/1826996181781574926?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/ER1yB_QO9-Q/analytics-10-design-process.html" title="Analytics 10: Design Process" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PkNBH4ECTuc/TfZVxZyFfgI/AAAAAAAAAco/PkchFliwo10/s72-c/home.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2011/06/analytics-10-design-process.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0YCRHo7eyp7ImA9WhZSFUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-2495920947198409404</id><published>2011-03-30T20:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-03-30T20:12:45.403-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-03-30T20:12:45.403-07:00</app:edited><title>The Best Screenshots of 2010</title><summary>I was cleaning out my screenshots folder (read: procrastinating) the other day and it turned out to be a fun little ride down memory lane. I don't remember why I took some of them but a few of them made me laugh. Some of them are things I found funny, others are bugs I found, and some are just random. Check them out:

</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/2495920947198409404/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=2495920947198409404" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/2495920947198409404?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/2495920947198409404?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/TOFkSw1pdaQ/best-screenshots-of-2010.html" title="The Best Screenshots of 2010" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-5GLqxeQVanA/TZPw4_qMVlI/AAAAAAAAAcM/rMPuiH06fBM/s72-c/screenshots_2010.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2011/03/best-screenshots-of-2010.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkABSX0_fip7ImA9WhZSFUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-2606009740564332403</id><published>2011-03-09T14:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-30T20:05:58.346-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-03-30T20:05:58.346-07:00</app:edited><title>When Technology Fails, People Die... or just get really, really angry.</title><summary>Updated: We're back together. I just couldn't stay away. I tried a few runs with the Adidas MiCoach, but in the end I came back to the loving embrace of Nike+ (with Runkeeper as well).

MiCoach is very cool. Although the site is in flash, it has some very robust coaching features. Very flexible and easy to set up. However, the in-run display and app experience were lacking.

The in-run display is</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/2606009740564332403/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=2606009740564332403" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/2606009740564332403?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/2606009740564332403?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/l98UxFDOnzc/when-technology-fails-people-die-or.html" title="When Technology Fails, People Die... or just get really, really angry." /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-u3DYWEQAh7I/TXfyny7kUEI/AAAAAAAAAcE/_CtPXUo1sbY/s72-c/green_level.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2011/03/when-technology-fails-people-die-or.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkQMQX47cCp7ImA9Wx9UFEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-8724639396967131043</id><published>2011-02-11T13:37:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-11T13:39:40.008-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-02-11T13:39:40.008-08:00</app:edited><title>Why I don't care that Adam Scott is not on the cover over EW with the rest of the cast of Parks &amp; Rec</title><summary>Nobody reads Entertainment Weekly. Sorry, that was mean. I'm sure people do. But most people just look at the cover while waiting in line at the grocery store. And really only when Megan Fox is on the cover who, by the way, is filming a new rom-com with Adam Scott and some other dude (worked in a plug, your welcome).

For comic reference: https://twitter.com/#!/elizabethbanks/status/</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/8724639396967131043/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=8724639396967131043" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/8724639396967131043?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/8724639396967131043?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/0capPU2n2hQ/why-i-dont-care-that-adam-scott-is-not.html" title="Why I don't care that Adam Scott is not on the cover over EW with the rest of the cast of Parks &amp; Rec" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2011/02/why-i-dont-care-that-adam-scott-is-not.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C04CQ3o5fCp7ImA9Wx9SE04.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-9050091626602451318</id><published>2010-12-02T15:19:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-12-02T15:19:22.424-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-12-02T15:19:22.424-08:00</app:edited><title>Notes for My Son</title><summary>A short but growing list of things every Dad should share with his son:


On hands in pockets:
Thumbs out, cool.
Thumbs in, itching your balls.


On bathroom exits:
Thumbs in pockets, spread. Feel loose? Your fly is down.

On talking while you pee:
Grunts are fine. Talk with friends. Never respond to, "hey, look at this." Ever.

Make your own HR bubble. Never trust anyone else's.

Never say "I </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/9050091626602451318/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=9050091626602451318" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/9050091626602451318?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/9050091626602451318?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/E64RU7w7UV4/notes-for-my-son.html" title="Notes for My Son" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/12/notes-for-my-son.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck8BRXg4eCp7ImA9Wx9TEUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-5534894230679648577</id><published>2010-11-19T10:20:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-11-19T10:20:54.630-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-11-19T10:20:54.630-08:00</app:edited><title>How many clicks?</title><summary>In the UX world we often get hung up on how many clicks it takes someone to do something. A product's usability can be effectively measured by how many clicks it takes to do a task. If you reduce a task's clicks from 20 to 10, give yourself a pat on the back.

However, I think we're missing an important step. The mouse move. 

We all know about the deadly triangle of interaction where a user </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/5534894230679648577/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=5534894230679648577" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/5534894230679648577?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/5534894230679648577?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/E8iVeet3AGM/how-many-clicks.html" title="How many clicks?" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/11/how-many-clicks.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0cAQH4_fSp7ImA9Wx9TEUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-8969423783777093528</id><published>2010-11-19T09:50:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-11-19T09:50:41.045-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-11-19T09:50:41.045-08:00</app:edited><title>Dear Facebook,</title><summary>Groups suck.

They really do. A friend of mine remarked how he liked the fact that his Facebook chat window was grouped in some manner. I thought I might like this idea too. I found the first thing in the Facebook UI and excitedly clicked it. I gleefully added 55 friends to this group. Some of these people are closer personal friends, some are just acquaintances. The common thread was that I met </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/8969423783777093528/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=8969423783777093528" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/8969423783777093528?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/8969423783777093528?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/uQEIDAsFfLM/dear-facebook.html" title="Dear Facebook," /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/11/dear-facebook.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU8MQ3o4cCp7ImA9Wx5aGEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-7453093959313926927</id><published>2010-11-15T18:18:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-11-15T18:18:02.438-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-11-15T18:18:02.438-08:00</app:edited><title>Love. Run. Repeat.</title><summary>This is my mantra. My motto. It came to me on my run this afternoon. A run I needed. I ran, I prayed, I got an answer. 

Love. Run. Repeat. 

I don't care if you believe in God. These are words to live by. They aren't a guarantee, they aren't new, easy, or a cure-all. They are the words I say to myself with each foot fall. Love. Run. Love. Run. Love...

One of the most important things as a </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/7453093959313926927/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=7453093959313926927" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/7453093959313926927?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/7453093959313926927?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/OKk5w1ER3HM/love-run-repeat.html" title="Love. Run. Repeat." /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/11/love-run-repeat.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUHRHk_eSp7ImA9Wx5XEk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-8127214736963312208</id><published>2010-09-10T22:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-09-11T13:50:35.741-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-09-11T13:50:35.741-07:00</app:edited><title>Updated! Nike+ GPS vs. Runkeeper: The Rundown</title><summary>2 years ago, I was NOT what you'd call an avid runner. I was out of shape, overweight, and trying to get back. That is where my iPhone, Runkeeper, and the data it provides, stepped in and changed everything.

I had a Nike+ Armband but the display malfunctioned because of a manufacturing defect.  I took it to the Nike Store and they gladly took it back and offered to replace it. Unfortunately, it </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/8127214736963312208/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=8127214736963312208" title="10 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/8127214736963312208?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/8127214736963312208?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/eMz3tmiew6U/nike-gps-vs-runkeeper-rundown.html" title="Updated! Nike+ GPS vs. Runkeeper: The Rundown" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_SLhM3HLZu0E/TIruM4_TURI/AAAAAAAAAbc/Mp6D2pWGK8k/s72-c/starting_run.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>10</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/09/nike-gps-vs-runkeeper-rundown.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEAESXk5eyp7ImA9Wx5QGEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-5615319898198058768</id><published>2010-09-07T09:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-09-07T09:25:08.723-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-09-07T09:25:08.723-07:00</app:edited><title>Two AMAZING improvements in iTunes 10 that need more hype</title><summary>The Ping feature along with AirPlay and TV show rentals in iTunes 10 got a lot of hype in last week's press event. But the features I discovered this morning have me in fanboy-rapture. 










Improved Syncing — It used to be that when you added a bunch of music, videos, photos, and apps to your iPad or iPhone you were likely to get some sort of message saying it couldn't be done for lack of </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/5615319898198058768/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=5615319898198058768" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/5615319898198058768?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/5615319898198058768?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/ILPtz0miIOA/two-amazing-improvements-in-itunes-10.html" title="Two AMAZING improvements in iTunes 10 that need more hype" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_SLhM3HLZu0E/TIZjuPWJKKI/AAAAAAAAAbU/OCsQJsWHL-Y/s72-c/available_space.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/09/two-amazing-improvements-in-itunes-10.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0MDQ3k6fyp7ImA9WxFaFUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-8962527347439568813</id><published>2010-07-19T21:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-07-19T21:17:52.717-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-07-19T21:17:52.717-07:00</app:edited><title>Lee Iaccoca Would Be Rolling in His Grave... If He Were Dead.</title><summary>My Mom sent me this email. It hailed the wisdom of Motor City's golden boy, Lee Iacocca and what he had to say about leadership in his book, Where Have All the Leaders Gone? (2007). It contained an excerpt. Here are some of the points taken from the email:
"Am I the only guy in this country who's fed up with what's happening? Where the h... is our outrage with this so called president? We should </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/8962527347439568813/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=8962527347439568813" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/8962527347439568813?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/8962527347439568813?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/bxSRBS1r_Yg/lee-iaccoca-would-be-rolling-in-his.html" title="Lee Iaccoca Would Be Rolling in His Grave... If He Were Dead." /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/07/lee-iaccoca-would-be-rolling-in-his.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0IERHc5eyp7ImA9WxFVFUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-7438822647295444539</id><published>2010-06-14T14:05:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-06-14T14:05:05.923-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-06-14T14:05:05.923-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ux design" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="xbox" /><title>New Xbox 360: Beautiful, but...</title><summary>
























Microsoft unveiled the new Xbox 360 design today at E3. Dayumm! This new black beauty definitely got added to my WANT list. I love my Xbox and I'm currently addicted to Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2. I made the switch to Xbox a couple years ago after waiting and waiting for GT5 to come out (which as of this post, it still hasn't) and never looked back.

Xbox represents </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/7438822647295444539/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=7438822647295444539" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/7438822647295444539?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/7438822647295444539?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/IE4lQNWtlRU/new-xbox-360-beautiful-but.html" title="New Xbox 360: Beautiful, but..." /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_SLhM3HLZu0E/TBaUZ79EpKI/AAAAAAAAAbA/PzPwo3X5aKs/s72-c/xbox_vs_apple.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/06/new-xbox-360-beautiful-but.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEQHQHYzeSp7ImA9WxFQEko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-7128796188682982707</id><published>2010-05-07T15:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-07T15:45:31.881-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-07T15:45:31.881-07:00</app:edited><title>Photoshop CS5 Wants Me to Drink Beer</title><summary>This is probably NOT a bug, but it is weird. I was prototyping some alert concepts for Webtrends Insight and pasted some alert text in to a new alert dialog idea. Now, maybe the last font I used was a 479.1 pixel Telegraphico, but I don't remember it, certainly not at 479.1 pixels. Either way, this is what I got. This message is quite clear. I need to drink beer. Specifically, Photoshop CS5would </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/7128796188682982707/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=7128796188682982707" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/7128796188682982707?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/7128796188682982707?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/823-U_HhTok/photoshop-cs5-wants-me-to-drink-beer.html" title="Photoshop CS5 Wants Me to Drink Beer" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_SLhM3HLZu0E/S-SWOckqAlI/AAAAAAAAAa4/_Cb3SnETuX4/s72-c/ale.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/05/photoshop-cs5-wants-me-to-drink-beer.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkcHR347cCp7ImA9WxFQEkw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-4525811106691799880</id><published>2010-05-06T21:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-06T22:27:16.008-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-06T22:27:16.008-07:00</app:edited><title>Today's 20 minute rant: Read Right Kleen &amp; Dry Redesign</title><summary>Today I cleaned a couple weeks worth of co-worker fingerprints, 2 year-old slobber, cat hair, dust, and other awesomeness off my MacBook Pro's display. Nothing like a good wipe down. But when I got to the office supply room I was surprised to see some innovation. Now, we're making progress. As you can see in the photo, we've gone from tiny, tiny text and loads of branding to clearly labeled "wet"</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/4525811106691799880/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=4525811106691799880" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/4525811106691799880?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/4525811106691799880?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/JFQsSqUy0yI/todays-20-minute-rant-read-right-kleen.html" title="Today's 20 minute rant: Read Right Kleen &amp; Dry Redesign" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_SLhM3HLZu0E/S-OdkRlmayI/AAAAAAAAAaw/SQZ50cw9Z44/s72-c/kleen_dry.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/05/todays-20-minute-rant-read-right-kleen.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUMNRH4zfSp7ImA9WxFQEUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-3939288085432699615</id><published>2010-05-06T09:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-06T09:31:35.085-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-06T09:31:35.085-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="app" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="wired" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fail" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tablet" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="android" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ipad" /><title>One Shot: Wired's Tablet App FAIL</title><summary>You remember 8 mile? I do, vaguely. The song "Lose Yourself" and a hooded Eminem pacing and vomiting in a crusty bathroom are stuck in my head.I imagine this is what @wired magazine's design team went through when they were designing the Wired tablet app. I mean, you got one of the most amazing magazines ever. It's techy, the iPad and tablets are techy. You've got compelling content that speaks </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/3939288085432699615/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=3939288085432699615" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/3939288085432699615?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/3939288085432699615?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/LQ09DpIpPVw/one-shot-wireds-tablet-app-fail.html" title="One Shot: Wired's Tablet App FAIL" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/05/one-shot-wireds-tablet-app-fail.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU4NSHc5eCp7ImA9WxFQEkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-1986905818720686664</id><published>2010-05-04T09:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-07T07:53:19.920-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-07T07:53:19.920-07:00</app:edited><title>More CS5 Ranting</title><summary>I'm sure I my constant ranting about Adobe's new Creative Suite 5 release is getting old. Both my twitter followers and surrounding co-workers must be tired of hearing about the latest UX faux pas from Adobe every 5 minutes.But here's the thing, it's really infuriating. For better or worse, my job requires me to work with Adobe's line of products. On a daily basis, I work in Photoshop, </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/1986905818720686664/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=1986905818720686664" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/1986905818720686664?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/1986905818720686664?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/_LxpaAAbGZA/more-cs5-ranting.html" title="More CS5 Ranting" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_SLhM3HLZu0E/S-Balik-g7I/AAAAAAAAAaQ/xf2snW0hjaM/s72-c/panels.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/05/more-cs5-ranting.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C04MQngzfip7ImA9WxFRFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-2106942829868386985</id><published>2010-04-30T16:40:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-04-30T16:59:43.686-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-04-30T16:59:43.686-07:00</app:edited><title>adobe Photoshop CS5 FAIL</title><summary>




Ever since Adobe introduced the tabbed file window in CS4 I have had a serious problem. The tabbed file window is great in many ways but it has a fatal flaw. A flaw that I run into every fucking day. Content-aware fill, 3D motion, applying paint effects, and moving a refs arms around might be something YOU do everyday. It's not for me. Those features are cool, but I'll use them once or twice</summary><link rel="enclosure" type="video/mp4" href="http://www.blogger.com/video-play.mp4?contentId=4466500e21e15981&amp;type=video%2Fmp4" length="0" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/2106942829868386985/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=2106942829868386985" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/2106942829868386985?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/2106942829868386985?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/u5pGZtI8tq8/adobe-photoshop-cs5-fail.html" title="adobe Photoshop CS5 FAIL" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/04/adobe-photoshop-cs5-fail.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkEHQn09fip7ImA9WxFSEUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-2790626002755854738</id><published>2010-04-13T15:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-04-13T15:43:53.366-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-04-13T15:43:53.366-07:00</app:edited><title>I'm Still Drunk... On AWESOMENESS!!</title><summary>This was my first year at SWSX. It was an inspiring rush of creative energy and geek fun. Here are some highlights:Put More Xbox in Your UX:Josh Knowles from Gilt Groupe and many other well know projects talked about rewarding and empowering users through challenges, accolades, and the structure of rules. His example was the game of soccer, a simple game of kicking a ball around made infinitely </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/2790626002755854738/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=2790626002755854738" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/2790626002755854738?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/2790626002755854738?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/Ks3xjVF4DD4/im-still-drunk-on-awesomeness.html" title="I'm Still Drunk... On AWESOMENESS!!" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2010/04/im-still-drunk-on-awesomeness.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DE4NRn45fCp7ImA9WxJVE0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-2877176220792258954</id><published>2009-06-29T16:09:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-29T16:09:57.024-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-29T16:09:57.024-07:00</app:edited><title>Google Street View Just Blew My Mind</title><summary>
                     Download now or watch on posterous       Google_Street_View.m4v (6788 KB)             I noticed this new feature a couple weeks ago on Google Maps but I really didn't appreciate it until I actually used it. Trying to locate the PF Chang's in downtown Portland, I was able to zoom around the Pearl District like a super hero. Simply amazing. I took some video of it just to show</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/2877176220792258954/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=2877176220792258954" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/2877176220792258954?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/2877176220792258954?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/2Hyg8I7mEfY/google-street-view-just-blew-my-mind.html" title="Google Street View Just Blew My Mind" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2009/06/google-street-view-just-blew-my-mind.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkAGQHY4cSp7ImA9WxJVE0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5101756.post-7406253193677322487</id><published>2009-06-29T15:32:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-29T15:32:01.839-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-29T15:32:01.839-07:00</app:edited><title>Trying Posterous</title><summary>
 An old picture I found in the National Archives. They're copyright free and very cool.        Posted via email   from David's posterous      </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skylark64.blogspot.com/feeds/7406253193677322487/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5101756&amp;postID=7406253193677322487" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/7406253193677322487?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5101756/posts/default/7406253193677322487?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/DmCQm/~3/okjFYAYWDi0/trying-posterous.html" title="Trying Posterous" /><author><name>David Stewart</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-7_rkCq_XR6c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAo0/1k07MmPpo_g/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://skylark64.blogspot.com/2009/06/trying-posterous.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

