Secrets of the Aether

Is Einstein’s Theory in Danger? - Developer Zone - National Instruments

2012-01-10T10:29:00.000-06:00

Is Einstein’s Theory in Danger? - Developer Zone - National Instruments:

Einstein's theory is not in danger. Einstein predicted that space was curved and that it could be stretched and compacted. The Sagnac effect that space could be dragged, like a fluid. "Frame dragging" is an essential correction in understanding light following a moving planet or star.

Positive holes (p-holes) are quantum units of space carrying charge in an electric circuit. Phonons are longitudinal waves in a stream of photons and demonstrate the space around photons is a compressible as any other fluid. Electric and magnetic fields are regions of space that convey force without the presence of physical matter. The gravitational force is also communicated at a distance through space.

This is possible because space is a 3D fabric of quantum rotating magnetic fields, much as Descartes proposed in the 1600s, and as numerous qualified physicists have quantified in the centuries since.

Neutrinos are strings of mass, which exist outside of the Aether fabric, and thus possess no properties of electricity or magnetism. Neutrinos can fly easily through planets and stars because they are not involved in the electric and magnetic fields of the particles comprising those bodies.

It is only when dark matter (strings of mass) are captured by Aether units that they become visible matter and are subjected to the physical laws within the Aether.

The CERN experiment is just one more proof that the Aether exists and that dark matter is not subject to the Aether's physical laws.

Scientists Store Photon Patterns and Retrieve Them From the Same Space Days Later

2011-12-23T23:07:00.000-06:00

Scientists Store Photon Patterns and Retrieve Them From the Same Space Days Later:

This story is particularly relevant to the Aether Physics Model. In Secrets of the Aether, I explain that the Aether is a five dimensional space-resonance structure in which space-time is a subset. There is an extra frequency dimension (frequency is reciprocal time) that light sees but which matter cannot see. Photons are able to pass into and out of this hidden time dimension.

As a result, it should be possible to build telescopes that not only see across space, but also to see across time. It would seem we are on our way to discovering such new technology.

Kaluza Klein Theory

2011-12-13T13:09:00.000-06:00

Kaluza Klein Theory: "In 1926 Oskar Klein extended this idea. Instead of assuming total independence of the extra dimension, he assumed it to be compact. This means the fifth dimension would have the topoloy of a circle, with a radius of the order of the Planck length. Five dimensional space-time then has the topology , and the fifth coordinate y is periodic, , where is the inverse radius of the circle. In our normal perception of space-time we would never be able to see this extra dimension."

'via Blog this'

I'm learning something new every day. The five dimensional physics theory I found in Classical Mechanics was apparently proposed in 1919 by Theodor Kaluza. However, he saw the missing dimension as a curled length dimension. I show the five dimensions are the three dimensions of length and two dimensions of frequency.

What we perceive as time pertains only when observing matter. All matter composes of half-spin subatomic particles, which are unable to spin in the backward direction of quantum frequency. However, light is capable of existing in both forward and backward time, and thus exists within a five dimensional framework.

This means radio and light waves can be manipulated to reveal information in not only the present, but also the past and possibly a short duration into the future.

Has The 'God Particle' Been Found? Major Announcement Expected Tuesday | Fox News

2011-12-12T23:00:00.000-06:00

Has The 'God Particle' Been Found? Major Announcement Expected Tuesday | Fox News: "This particle, which has long been theorized but never detected, is thought to give all other particles mass. "

'via Blog this'

This "discovery" is the most absurd of all absurdities in the Standard Model. Mass is a dimension, not a material thing. To say that a particle gives other particles mass is as absurd as claiming to discover a length particle that gives matter length. It's just as absurd as the so-called "force particle" "bosons." Force is not caused by particles, either.

If they are going to say that mass is a particle, then time, length, and charge would also have to be particles. But they are not, they are dimensions. That is, they are properties of things, not things themselves.

Cosmic Log - Faster-than-light neutrinos pass test

2011-11-19T06:12:00.000-06:00

Cosmic Log - Faster-than-light neutrinos pass test:

'via Blog this'

This experiment is more strong evidence for the existence of the Aether. Light will travel consistently at the speed of photons. However, neutrinos, which are dark matter and exist outside the fabric of spacetime, travel independent of the Aether's speed limit. All of this is quantified and explained in the Aether Physics Model.

Heartbreaker: Major Setback in Quest for 'God Particle' - FoxNews.com

2011-06-10T20:20:00.000-05:00

Like I have been saying for years, there is no Higgs Boson. Physical matter did not arise from physical matter. Physical matter arose from non-material, yet real, existence. The Aether Physics Model shows clearly how everything arose from the Singularity in a fractal-like manner.

Heartbreaker: Major Setback in Quest for 'God Particle' - FoxNews.com

NASA - NASA'S Spitzer Sees Crystal "Rain" In Outer Clouds Of Infant Star

2011-05-27T08:37:00.000-05:00

NASA - NASA'S Spitzer Sees Crystal "Rain" In Outer Clouds Of Infant Star

The Aether Physics Model shows the Casimir effect and both hot and cold fusion generate new matter. New materials are constantly being created in the Universe even as older materials are constantly being destroyed in the centers of galaxies through collapsing space (incorrectly called a super massive black hole in the Standard Model).

Small moons in our own solar system are witnessed as dispensing constant jets of water and other molecules into space. The Sun is both increasing in mass and ejecting material at the same time. And now NASA is witnessing a single molecule in abundance in a star forming region of space.

It is a wild stretch of the imagination to suggest a brand new forming star formed olivine molecules and then selectively blasted them into space, where they would be seen raining back down. It is more likely that conditions exist for new matter to form and produce a specific molecule. It would be kind of like a knitting machine that creates its own yarn to make sweaters. Similar processes likely create water molecules, hydrocarbons, and numerous other molecules that are found in veins and pools within the Earth.

Electron confounds predictions and remains stubbornly spherical

2011-05-26T13:45:00.002-05:00

The Aether Physics Model reveals a complex structure for the electron. There is an electrostatic charge, which is spherical, and a magnet charge, which is toroidal. The geometry of the electron is not inherent, but is inherited from the space in which it resides.

Electrostatic charge actually belongs to the Aether unit. The electron is created when a string of dark matter is absorbed by an Aether unit. Thus the electron is a composite of dark matter and Aether, which results in visible matter.

The electrostatic charge of the electron exhibits the spherical property of the Aether electrostatic charge. The movement of the circular string of mass (dark matter) around the electrostatic charge creates magnetic charge.

When scientists measure only the electrostatic charge of the electron while looking for its shape, they see the spherical electrostatic charge of the Aether unit and then assume the electron is spherical. This is a mistake in perception caused from a limited perspective.

If they were to examine the geometry of the electron based upon its magnetic charge, rather than its electrostatic charge, they would see a toroidal shape.

The Standard Model does not yet acknowledge the property of magnetic charge, but attempts to describe magnetism in terms of moving electrostatic charge. Although the two types of charges are intimately related, they are nonetheless distinctly different physical properties.

When the two properties are properly understood and quantified, as in the Aether Phyiscs Model, then it becomes possible to properly unify all the fundamental forces. The weak interaction is seen as a ratio of the electrostatic to magnetic charge carriers and not as a "dimensionless force," as the Standard Model describes it.

Physicists discover new quantum state of water - physicsworld.com

2011-02-10T16:00:00.000-06:00

Physicists discover new quantum state of water - physicsworld.com

In this article, physicists realize that the binding of hydrogen to oxygen in water cannot be fully explained only with electrostatic force. But instead of accepting there is a magnetic charge in the hydrogen and oxygen atoms contributing to the binding, they are looking for a solution in potential wells and in the probability functions of quantum mechanics.

The Aether Physics Model suggests the extra force between the hydrogen and oxygen atoms is due to the magnetic force associated with protons and electrons. The net magnetic force within an atom can be neutralized, the same as can the electrostatic force. However, due to geometry and uneven pairing of quantum particles, atoms can have net magnetic field strength.

This allows for binding between atoms either directly through permanent magnetism (as in certain iron, nickel, and other magnetic isotopes) or indirectly through paramagnetism and diamagnetism.

Even if the mainstream has not accepted the APM, their experiments and observations continue to provide evidence in its favor.

Thermal Casimir force seen for the first time - physicsworld.com

2011-02-10T15:45:00.000-06:00

Thermal Casimir force seen for the first time - physicsworld.com

More experiments on the Casimir force have been performed. What the results show is that the earlier belief that the Casimir force dropped off with the cube of the distance has been proven wrong. In fact, the Casimir force does drop off with the distance squared, just as the electrostatic force does, but at a different rate.

Instead of admitting they were wrong, Steven Lamoreaux and others are now saying they have proven yet another type of force; the thermal Casimir force. Although the data is undoubtedly of high caliber, the interpretation of the data follows the same nonsense as earlier interpretations and only makes physics even more complicated.

It would be instructive for the scientists to compare their results to the predictions of the Aether Phyisics Model, which precisely quantifies the Casimir force in terms of the newly identified electromagnetic charge. I would wager the APM would predict the force exactly, and not merely close as all the other theories claim. This is clearly an opportunity to silence me if the results prove the APM incorrect.

Electron angular momentum causes spirals in free space

2011-01-14T22:16:00.000-06:00

NIST has again helped the Aether Physics Model.

"Passing electrons through a nanometer-scale grating, the scientists imparted the resulting electron waves with so much orbital momentum that they maintained a corkscrew shape in free space."

The Aether Physics Model explains the structure of subatomic particles as having toroidal geometry. This toroidal geometry is dynamically scanned, rather than being a static donut. The scanning of the toroidal shape is what gives the electron its intrinsic angular momentum.

The only way the electron can maintain a corkscrew shape in "free space" (aka Aether) is if the structures of the electron and the space allow it. If the electron was a point particle, there would be no basis for this corkscrew behavior, as there is nothing the electron could orbit that could impart the property of angular momentum. The electron's behavior can only be explained if the angular momentum is inherent to the electron, as described in the Aether Physics Model.

"A beam of corkscrew-shaped electrons, when interacting with a specimen, can exert torque on the material, by exchanging angular momentum with its atoms. In this way, the corkscrew electrons could obtain more information in the process than beams with ordinary electrons, which do not carry this orbital angular momentum."

This truly is a novel technique for extending the usefulness of the electron, but it is not physically explainable with the Standard Model of Physics.

Intergalactic Weather Map - An Ice Cube Makes the Room Warmer?

2010-12-09T10:21:00.000-06:00

The nonsense is never ending at NASA. Check out this article: NASA - Intergalactic Weather Map

To begin with, they are producing a temperature map of the space surrounding galaxy NGC 5813 and reverse the temperature scale. Instead of using red to represent the cooler temperature and blue to represent the higher temperature, such as in reality, blue is cooler and red is warmer.

In the produced map, the galaxy is seen as cooler than the surrounding space. NASA's interpretation? The cool galaxy is heating up the surrounding space at huge scales of distance. An ice cube makes the room warmer? How does NASA explain this?

Powerful jets produced as gas swirls toward the black hole push cavities into the hot gas and drive shock waves -- like sonic booms -- outwards, heating the gas.

So gas (nearly invisible hydrogen with practically no mass) swirls into a mythical black hole and then produces powerful shock waves that heat up vast areas of space light years from the source without heating the galaxy. A rational person would ask why the more dense gas near the galaxy does not heat up more than the far distant regions of space! It is as though their proposed shock waves possess magical properties transcending space.

If one were to look at this scenario from the perspective of the Aether Physics Model, one would see the so-called "black hole" as a region of disappearing matter at the center of a galaxy. The larger a galaxy is, the faster matter disappears at its center. Thus the light and matter traveling to the center of the galaxy disappears and the center of the galaxy appears cooler than the surrounding space. A similar effect happens in tornadoes, and wind vortexes on Earth, although in these cases the heat is pumped away in the form of infrared radiation, such as at the tops of strong thunderstorms.

Matter continually is created through the Casimir effect (affecting electrons), and fusion (affecting protons). Thus in regions away from galactic centers, it would appear warmer.

The collapsing of matter at the centers of galaxies and the generation of matter in the outer regions creates the inward spiral that is seen in all well established galaxies.

The jets observed in the polar regions of the galaxies are similar to the jets of heat seen above thunderstorms. The inward spiral both destroys matter, but also squeezes matter and causes some of it to escape at high velocities.

Radiation ripples show the Big Bang theory is wrong.

2010-12-05T13:12:00.000-06:00

Scientists have found rings of radiation in the cosmos that may be older than the Big Bang, suggesting that event was just the latest in a series of rebirths, Wired reports.

What the evidence really suggests is that the Universe is eternal, as the Aether Physics Model suggests.

The Big Bang theory absurdly claims all matter matter in the Universe exploded out of a point smaller than an atom. The estimate for the beginning time of this explosion has varied from 13 billion years ago to 20 billion years ago, depending upon where in the Universe one looks.

The large bands of dark matter, if they exist, are more likely to be caused by random magnetic, electrostatic, and gravitational structures that occur at huge scales, which would mirror that randomly spread clusters of galaxies throughout the visible Universe.

Another failure of the Big Bang theory is that there is no apparent edge to the Universe. The stronger telescopes are made, the further they can see, with no end in sight.

The article tries to spin the lack of Big Bang evidence into a new theory where concentric circles are born from the same location in the Universe, which would mean there would be something magical about that location. And then concludes with this sentence, "However he added that there was not enough detail to assess the reality of the circles yet." In other words, there is no more evidence for the concentric circles than there is for the Big Bang.

The Aether Physics Model shows that the Universe is continually expanding and contracting at the same time. The outer rings of galaxies expand with new matter, and the centers of galaxies implode old matter, which causes the galactic spirals to occur. Dark matter is nothing more than visible matter losing its charge when the space-time around it collapses. Visible matter is dark matter that gains charge when new Aether is generated during the Casimir effect and fusion.

"Empty Eruption"?

2010-09-30T11:03:00.000-05:00

According to the Standard Model, magnetism is a property of matter, it is not a substance of itself. Yet, when science observation shows that magnetism is indeed a substance of itself, scientists have no problem saying so. The following is from spaceweather.com...

This was an "empty eruption." It hurled no significant cloud of plasma into space. Imagine something exploding with more power than ten atomic bombs and not producing a spray of debris. That's essentially what happened here. The loop was made of more magnetism than matter.

Magnetism is empty space, hence it produces an empty eruption when it explodes. So it is very clear that magnetism is real and has real properties, which releases real energy. But what is this empty space that it could release so much energy?

The empty space is Aether, the non-material substance that carries light across the Universe and which physicists claim does not exist. And despite the constant denials, physicists continually observe empty space doing work such as with phonons, magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, gravitational fields, spins, and other observable non-material forms of reality.

How much longer will it be before Aether is welcomed back into mainstream science?

Vajra Periodic Table

2010-09-26T17:35:00.000-05:00

Today, I have released the new Vajra Periodic Table for the Aether Physics Model. The purpose of this periodic table is to provide a visual reference to researchers trying to discover the nuclear binding energy equation.

Fernando Dufour came up with the general concept in his 3D Periodic Table, however, his model places all the elements to the same side of the hydrogen atom. It seemed to me that this is not the natural state of atomic construction. Atomic construction should be symmetrical, and so I began drawing images of a symmetrical periodic table until this form manifested.

What struck me about the finished layout is that the overall design resembled the ancient Vajra concept. It almost seems as though the ancients already knew how atoms constructed within the Aether. So I named the periodic table after the ancient Vajra model.

You can purchase a wall print of this Periodic Table in just about any size at Zazzle. The poster was designed to be 42.5" by 32.5" and is in high resolution in the print format.

Scientific Discovery Too Hard - Turning in the Towel

2010-09-26T09:42:00.000-05:00

It looks like new discoveries in mainstream physics is nearing the end.

Russell Stannard, professor emeritus of physics at the Open University, argues that although existing scientific knowledge will continue to be applied in news ways, "the gaining of knowledge about fundamental laws of nature and the constituents of the world, that must come to an end”.

Too bad. If they would study the Aether Physics Model and see that their charge notation is wrong, and that there are two quantifiable fundamental charges (electrostatic charge and magnetic charge), they would be making new fundamental discoveries. Furthermore, science would suddenly become easy to understand, and agree with common sense.

Instead of spending billions of dollars and wasting thousands of top-rate scientists time by working on particle accelerators designed to find non-existent particles, they could be reworking the foundations of physics to fix its errors.

But try to show these same physicists their errors and their feelings get hurt. They become incredibly defensive and extremely rude. Instead of admitting error, they build bigger machines, spend more money, and waste more time. They are like little children who have not been taught humility.

Eventually, the one-track-minded scientists will die off and younger, more flexible minds will fill their prestigious seats. Won't they be shocked when they see the proper foundations for physics were long ignored, even though they were made plainly visible on the Internet?

APM solves Casimir's Problem

2010-09-12T13:37:00.000-05:00

In 1948, Hendrick Casimir and D. Polder wrote a paper concerning their quantification of what has become known as the Casimir force.

Casimir derived his equation to a fourth order perturbation. This amounted to a reasonable approximation for the force, but it was not precise.

In the Aether Physics Model I developed the magnetic force law for the electron. Later, I discovered the magnetic force law for the electron was nearly identical to the Casimir force equation, although transposed into different units and constants.

Just today, it was brought to my attention that Hendrick Casimir's paper published in Phys Rev 73, 360 is now available online. Here is the last paragraph of that paper:

"The very simple form of eq (56) and the analogous formula (25) suggest that it might be possible to derive these expressions, perhaps apart from the numerical factors, by more elementary considerations. This would be desirable since it would also give a more physical background to our result, a result which in our opinion is rather remarkable. So far we have not been able to find such a simple argument."

Casimir had been looking for the simple expression for his equation, but was unable to find it. The reason was because modern physics incorrectly notates the dimension of charge (it should always be distributed) and also modern physics did not discover the proper quantification for magnetic charge (strong charge, electromagnetic charge). The APM fixed these errors of modern physics and solved the Casimir Problem.

Radioactivity is influenced by the Sun

2010-08-23T23:11:00.000-05:00

It has long been my view that radioactivity rates are not constant. My reasoning rests partially upon the counter-intuitive conclusions often determined by radiocarbon dating, but also on variations in Aether densities (magnetic flux densities).

It looks like the scientific evidence supports this view. A new article appearing on Stanford University News reports on the observation of variable decay rates coinciding with solar activity.

In particular, the radioactive decay rates coincide with the Earth being closest to the Sun and when a specific side of the Sun faces Earth.

Space is a fabric of Aether units. Like all things in the Universe, Aether is not smoothly distributed everywhere. In fact, Aether is very dense inside material bodies, such as the Sun, and very rarefied at the Sun's surface. This is caused by neutron formation, which pinches the Aether fabric.

The decay of free neutrons, and neutrons in free spaces within certain atomic elements (radioactive elements), should be partially dependent upon Aether density. Changes in Aether density will cause changes in distances between subatomic particles and even within molecules and atoms. This will affect the decay rate of neutrons, which in turn affect the decay rate of the atoms and molecules the neutrons are part of.

The closer the Earth is to the Sun, the less dense the Aether is. There also appears to be a powerful magnetic structure emanating from within the Sun and extending to the outer edges of the solar system; like a magnetic beacon. This causes alternations in magnetic flux density (Aether density) as the magnetic structure passes by Earth.

Further, the magnetic intensity of the Sun is likely to be affected by the Sun's position within the galactic magnetic field. So there is likely to be variations of radioactive decay extending over very long term cycles, just as there are observed variations at shorter cycles. Also, magnetic effects associated with gravitational waves from distant supernovas should also affect neutron decay rates.

Unlike the neutrino hypothesis proposed by Stanford scientists, the magnetic flux density hypothesis can explain how decay rates can be affected a day or so before solar flares, as changes in magnetic structures are already known to be the cause of solar flares.

Expanding Universe

2010-08-21T12:30:00.000-05:00

The same physics stories are often repeated, almost suggesting a conspiracy to brainwash the public. Scientists have said for decades the Universe is expanding, and it seems every couple of weeks we are reminded of this.

The Aether Physics Model does suggest the Universe is continually expanding. But the APM also points out the Universe is continually contracting, such as at the centers of galaxies.

As protons bind with electrons, they produce neutrons and also force their encapsulating Aether units to fold over onto each other. Thus two Aether units occupy the same space as one Aether unit. This means that as matter becomes denser by the production of neutrons, space also becomes denser.

However, as space becomes denser adjoining Aether units are stretched to help keep space "full." This means the regions of space surrounding dense objects gets rarefied and can produce optical effects on the photons passing through it. The optical effects manifest as gravitational lensing, orbital precessing, and other Relativity effects.

As matter and space become too dense in the centers of galaxies, the space collapses and unravels while taking the matter within that space with it. Thus, entire stars disappear forever as they enter the galactic core's disintegrating vortex.

If contraction was the whole story, the Universe would shrink until there was just a small pile of matter left floating in space, which would not be dense enough to cause the unraveling of the remaining Aether.

Fortunately, due to the Casimir effect on electrons and hot/cold fusion effects on protons, new visible matter constantly generates. Along with the creation of new matter also comes the creation of new Aether units, or space.

And so it goes. The mass underlying visible matter is converted to dark matter at the centers of galaxies and then through the Casimir effect and fusion, new matter is created elsewhere in the galaxy. When visible matter becomes unraveled, its form becomes dark matter. This is because the Aether is the source of electricity and magnetism. If dark matter is not encapsulated within Aether units, then there is no visible (electromagnetic) matter.

Different regions of the Universe have varying densities of dark matter available, which may become fuel for generating new visible matter. Thus, the observations of galactic clusters would tell us that underlying the galactic cluster is a vast region of space possessing a large deposit of dark matter. Conversely, regions of space devoid of visible matter and relativistic effects must be lacking in dark matter density.

As for "dark energy," that is a misnomer. There is no such "thing" as "visible energy," let alone "dark energy." Energy is a unit of work. Energy is real as a property of matter, but it is not a material thing of itself. One cannot make something material from a substance called energy. Matter can only be built from matter. Visible matter can be built from dark matter, and it can be unraveled. But energy is only the movement of matter, and matter must possess the dimension of mass.

Many scientists are fooled into thinking dark energy is some kind of hidden light because energy is often used as a synonym for visible light. Light is electromagnetic radiation, or a manifestation of mass momentum within the fabric of Aether. Dark matter does not exist within the Aether fabric, but rather has its existence outside of the Aether. Therefore, dark matter has no electric or magnetic properties and cannot be a type of electromagnetic radiation in any form.

According to the Aether Physics Model, dark matter is properly defined and quantified as strings of mass. If the strings of mass are moving relative to the Aether, such as neutrinos being released from beta decay neutrons, then it can be said that dark matter possesses the property of energy. But it is inappropriate to describe the energy as something separate from the dark matter, itself. There is only dark matter, whether it is moving or not.

So the ever expanding and contracting Universe is driven by the continual process of visible matter converting to dark matter, and dark matter converting back to visible matter. Whether the Universe appears to be expanding or contracting depends upon where you are looking.

The Higgs Boson is difficult to detect! Therefore it must be lighter?

2010-07-29T22:35:00.000-05:00

Experiments at Fermilab have narrowed the range of possible masses for the Higgs Boson – the elusive particle that physicists hope to see for the first time at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The results rule out about one quarter of the previous mass range for the Higgs and boost the chances that it will be rather lightweight – and therefore more difficult to detect.

Maybe the Higgs Boson does not exist?

The failure of the Standard Model rests in its wrong assumptions. Physicists assume that all matter is solid and physical, and therefore particles that make up other particles must necessarily be smaller, solid, physical particles.

They believe this despite clear evidence that the electron is cloud-like in its structure. Physicists even have to quantify the structure of the electron in terms of probability functions, and actually believe the electron is a crap shot.

The Standard Model does not allow for the concept of different orders of reality, which lead from physical matter to non-material existence. In the end, however, that is exactly what physicists will have to admit.

The Aether Physics Model uses quantum dimensional analysis to induce that primary angular momentum is actually a state of matter, or more accurately, the transition state of matter as it evolves from non-material structure to physical structure.

The Aether Physics Model also shows that mass is a property, not a physical thing. Mass is a property of matter, just as are the properties of length, frequency, and charge. The so-called "god particle" simply does not exist.

Electrons and protons are a transition state of reality where non-material Aether (quantum rotating magnetic field) captures dark matter and convert's it to visible matter.

Outside of Aether, dark matter possesses the property of mass but does not possess the property of charge. Therefore, dark matter appears invisible to visible matter.

When protons and neutrons are destroyed in a collision, the so-called "quarks" are merely the last moments of an Aether unit being destroyed, and the primary angular momentum of the subatomic particle transiting back to dark matter. That is why the hypothetical sea of quarks has ever been observed. It is also why the hypothetical Higgs Boson will never be observed.

The paradigm of the Standard Model bases upon false assumptions, which is why the Standard Model has so many dead ends and paradoxes.

Metaphysics and Physics

2010-05-15T18:10:00.002-05:00

Underlying all physical existence is non-material existence. What is non-material existence? Magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, and gravitational fields are all measurable and yet non-material forms of existence. Velocity is measurable, and yet it is non-material. There are more forms of measurable and experiential non-material existence than there are physical objects.

Metaphysics is the scientific study of non-material reality. Just as physical existence is systematically studied through mathematics in physics, we can also devise a mathematically-based system of study for metaphysics. In fact, much of physics is already about studying non-material reality.

Where modern physics fails, however, is at its most fundamental level. It turns out the dimension of charge is improperly notated in our system of physics. Instead of a single dimension of charge being related to a single dimension of mass, all charge should be distributed relative to the dimension of mass. When this, and several resulting errors are corrected, a proper system of physics emerges, which allows us to measure non-material things such as feelings.

It is in the realm of feelings, which the mind has direct control of, where we can develop abilities exceeding our mechanical abilities.

The science for understanding metaphysics is being developed and published freely online. The study is open to collaboration and independent research. For an introduction to the sciences of Metaphysics and Physics as seen through the proper scientific paradigm, please read the book posted online at www.metaphysics-and-physics.com.

2010-01-21T22:24:00.003-06:00

2010-01-21T22:24:00.001-06:00

Aether Structures in Light? Who would have thought?

2010-01-18T10:03:00.000-06:00

The Aether Physics Model induces the geometry of a quantum Aether unit as a tubular loxodrome. The Aether unit encapsulates dark matter to produce electrons and protons. The Aether unit also carries angular momentum from electrons and positrons, which is a photon. That is, photons have the geometry of Aether units.

Naturally, it was just a matter of time before scientists discovered that photons and light have the geometry of Aether units. That is exactly what appears to be the case as posted in a recent article on Live Science. The so-called "knots" are identical to Aether unit geometry.

In an earlier story on Live Science, it was shown that light in nanoscale structures exhibits force. This is evidence for the electron-positron angular momentum stored in photons. The electron-positron angular momentum activates the Aether's electrostatic and electromagnetic dipoles. By manipulating the angles of photons, one can create both attractive and repulsive forces between photons.

New Interferometer Experiment

2009-10-24T16:35:00.003-05:00

There is a new video on YouTube demonstrating the Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment. The interferometer experiment replicates earlier designs, except the laser is rotated in the vertical plane in addition to the horizontal plane.

The Aether Physics Model quantifies the Aether as the container of matter. Therefore, where there is denser matter there is also greater Aether density. The greater the Aether density, the more time it will take for light to travel a given distance.

The Michelson-Morley experiment rotated in the horizontal plane. This meant the interferometer was rotating through an even Aether density. Dayton Miller later performed the same experiments on top of Mount Wilson and measured a definite (but small) Aether drift. For technical reasons, early interferometers could not be rotated in the vertical plane.

The mindless skeptics are already dismissing the experiment as a flexing of the metal table, which is absurd. As more people replicate the vertical rotating interferometer, the results will begin accumulating and the skeptics will be forever dismissed.

According to the Aether Physics Model, this experiment should also work on the Moon and even the space station. Further, the number of peaks in the interference pattern should decrease proportional to the mass of the body the experiment is performed near. Even further, the number of peaks should decrease with an increase in distance away from the center of mass.

I'm not yet sure of the experimenter's name, but I will be following up on this story. This will be one of the biggest breakthrough experiments of all time in fundamental physics.