Secrets of the Aether

Discover Aether Secrets: Revolutionizing Physics Unity

2025-07-12T21:50:00.003-05:00

What if the universe isn't built on elusive particles and abstract fields, but a dynamic Aether medium that unifies everything—from gravity to quantum quirks? Our new paper, "Unifying Physics with the Aether: An Introduction to the Aether Physics Model," co-authored with insights from advanced AI, challenges the Standard Model's gaps and proposes a quantized Aether as the key to it all. Posted to ResearchGate in May 2024 (DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24695.64163), this framework could transform cosmology, quantum computing, and beyond. Dive in with us!

Introduction to the Aether Physics Model

The Standard Model has nailed many predictions, but it falls short on gravity, dark matter (95% of the universe!), and force unification. Enter the Aether Physics Model (APM): It revives a discrete Aether medium of quantum units, driven by "chronovibration"—oscillating forward-backward time from a Singularity. This creates Gforce (dark energy), magnetic charge, and dark matter as 1D mass strings.

Key prediction: Particles emerge from dark matter interacting with Aether units, explaining phenomena like the Casimir effect and quantum Hall effect better than before.

The Singularity: Source of Everything

At APM's core is the Singularity, a dimensionless point birthing all. Mathematically (in Quantum Measurement Units):

1 = (m_a· λ_C· F_q^2) / Gforce

1 = e^2 / (8πa· e_a^2)

Here, dark matter (vibrating mass strings m_a· λ_C· F_q^2), Gforce, electrostatic charge (e^2), and magnetic charge (e_a^2) emerge. Gforce interacts with magnetic charge to form Aether units—space's building blocks.

Unlike the Standard Model's arbitrary parameters, APM unifies origins.

Chronovibration: Rethinking Time

Time isn't linear; it's chronovibration—oscillating between forward/backward directions, with right-left torque as a second frequency.

Quantum frequency: F_q = c / λ_C

This creates the "present moment" and linear time illusion. Time dilation? It's space compression in high-speed or gravitational fields, not time itself slowing.

Implications: Entropy ties to matter arrangement, not time's arrow. Backward time hides inside Aether spheres.

Aether Units: Quantum Space Blocks

Aether is dynamic, discrete units with spherical electrostatic surfaces and tubular loxodromes (4 per unit: 2 right-spin, 2 left). Geometry: A_u = 16π^2· k_C (Coulomb constant).

Particles occupy one half, yielding monopole electric but dipole magnetic charge. Forces transmit via Aether: Gravity as space filling with mass, G = λ_C^3· F_q^2 / m_a.

Black holes? Aether collapses at max density.

Explaining Key Phenomena

Casimir Effect: Not vacuum fluctuations, but magnetic charges interacting: F = (k_C· e_emax^2· A) / L^4
Quantum Hall Effect: Whole magnetic charges reorganize, not fractional electrons.
Wigner Crystals: Magnetic alignment in low-density electron gases.
Entanglement: Interconnected magnetic charges enable non-local correlations.
Dark Matter/Energy: Mass strings and Gforce explain gravitational effects and expansion.

APM advantages: Intuitive, avoids infinities, unifies forces without extras like supersymmetry.

Figure: Aether Unit Structure – Double spheres with loxodromes.

Discussion: Challenges and Tests

APM addresses Standard Model limits (hierarchy problem, neutrino masses) but needs experiments. Test via precise Casimir measurements or quantum entanglement probes.

Open questions: Backward time's role? Consciousness link?

Conclusion

APM isn't just theory—it's a paradigm shift, unifying physics via Aether. Potential: Quantum tech, cosmology insights, sustainable energy.

Download the full PDF https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2469564163. Thoughts? Comment below—join the revolution! Researchers, collaborate on tests. Share on X for discussions.

Time is not something that pushes matter from the past toward the future.

2021-07-07T17:42:00.001-05:00

From my Quora answer:

Time is not an active player in the Universe; that is, time does not do things to physical matter or space. Time is an observation of what physical matter and space does. Physical matter endures, and we map this endurance as time.

Time is not a conveyor belt that pushes physical matter into change, and neither does time move consciousness passed an infinite number of static, physical Universes and in chronological order.

The only thing that physically changes is the physical matter in the present moment. There is no physical matter in the past, and there is no physical matter in the future. Change only occurs right here, and right now.

It is the half-spin nature of physical matter that causes physical matter to spin in the forward time direction, even while physical matter is rooted in the present moment.

Why Imaginary Numbers Do Not Belong in Physics

2019-10-11T16:01:00.003-05:00

I was reading an excellent article on Quanta Magazine titled "How to Find Simple Treasures in Complex Numbers." The article explains in very simple terms how to appreciate and understand what imaginary numbers are and how they work.

In short, imaginary numbers provide a solution to a problem when one element of an equation is missing. Imaginary numbers occur in several physics equations, such as in calculating the impedance of an electrical circuit.

Due to an error in modern systems of units, charge is notated as a single dimension in almost all units, but charge is notated as charge squared in five units. This creates a situation in some equations where unlike units are added together. When unlike units are added, the imaginary number is needed to account for the missing dimension.

What is Time?

2019-06-24T16:19:00.006-05:00

I have written some notes about time. They are posted to Secrets of the Aether, and I have re-posted the notes here:

Time is a familiar concept, but it is also greatly misunderstood.

Physicists think of time in many strange ways. In the theory of Special Relativity, the rate of the passage of time is seen as relative based on the velocity of an object as compared to an observer. The theory of General Relativity suggests that time passes at different rates based on gravity. The Sagnac theory of Relativity suggests the rate of time varies according to the angular momentum of an object in orbit around another object.

Time is a linear dimension which is perceived to flow from the past toward the future. It is as though time were a wave of awareness that travels through an infinite number of holographic frames resulting in the apparent animation of those holographic frames. However, nobody has ever measured physical matter in a time frame that is different from the present time frame.

Of the past, present, and future of time, only the present is ever directly experienced and observed. The past and future are always imagined. All the physical matter of the entire Universe has ever only been observed to physically exist in the present moment. Even light from distant galaxies, which depict galaxies as they existed millions and even billions of years ago, is still observed in the present. Yes, the light gathered through telescopes show us what the galaxies looked like in the past, just like photographs and movies do, but we are still experiencing the light from the present.

Physical matter has never been observed to leave the present, and then appear in the past or future, and neither has anything from the past or future ever suddenly materialized in the present. We can write books, and produce movies that demonstrate what time travel might look like, but no scientific observation has ever demonstrated physical matter actually traveling through time.

What Relativity theories do demonstrate are distortions of space, and relative perceptions, but these distortions and perceptions always take place in the present. Through imagination and twisting words we can create the perception that time is slowing down or speeding up, but these are only mind games. In the end, everything remains in the present moment.

So how do we account for change if we are always in the present moment? Time is the reciprocal of frequency, and frequency is a dimension that actually takes place in the present moment. Most equations used in physics place time in the denominator, which is essentially saying that we are really talking about frequency, as opposed to time.

In the Aether Physics Model, the fundamental forces of nature are unified to a common factor, the Gforce. The Gforce is reciprocal to the fundamental physical forces, and is of a non-material nature. The Gforce maintains an oscillation in the fields of space, which oscillates between right/left spin, and forward/backward time. The Gforce is all pervading, and represents a single source, even though it manifests through every subatomic particle and quantum of space throughout the entire physical Universe. It is the oscillation of the Gforce between forward/backward time that produces the experience, which is experienced by the mind as the "present."

Due to the structure of the quantum, rotating magnetic fields that make up all space, when these quantum, rotating magnetic fields absorb a strand of dark matter (string of mass), a subatomic particle is produced. The subatomic particle is a quantum unit of angular momentum, which either possesses the mass of the electron (or positron) or the mass of the proton (or antiproton). The structure of the subatomic particle prevents it from spinning in the backward time direction, and only allows it to spin in the forward time direction. This is observed in mainstream physics as the half-spin nature of subatomic particles. In effect, subatomic particles are "time diodes."

It is due to the half-spin nature of the subatomic particles, which only spin in the forward direction of time, that we perceive time as a forward movement from past to future. If it were not for the existence of subatomic particles, we would have no perception of time at all.

What this means is that the only time that exists, is the present moment. There is no physical past or future that we can travel to. The past and the future exist only in our memories and dreams. It also means that any interpretation by Relativity theories of time travel are impossible. Even if matter could leak out of the present moment, it has no physical place to go to. The only thing Relativity theories demonstrate are distortions of perception.

There are also major psychological consequences for realizing that time is just a perception, and that only the present exists. The past is only a memory, and the future is not ordained. The present is the only physical reality, and the only moment that directly affects us. There was no past that needs to be preserved or changed. There will be no future that needs to be feared or materialized. The only time that has any effect on our lives, and the lives of others, is occurring right now.

David Thomson's answer to What exactly is space-time? Is it something we can touch? How does it bend and interact with mass? - Quora

2018-10-12T10:05:00.001-05:00

I answered a question on Quora about how space-time interacts with matter.

If you want to know what space-time is from your human perspective, it is basically whatever you want it to be. From our human perspective, space can mean volume, vacuum, emptiness, privacy, and on and on. Similarly, time can be thought of as a trajectory from past to future, numbers from a clock, duration, life, and on and on. Space and time from our human perspective is all about perception. At our macro scale of existence, there is nothing absolute about space, time, or space-time.

At the quantum scale of existence, things are different. If you hold two magnets, one in each hand, and move them close to each other, you experience the effects of Aether manifested as magnetic fields. Aether has a quantum state, which is in physics, a quantum rotating magnetic field with the property of 2-spin. Aether exists as a five dimensional manifold with three dimensions of length and two dimensions of frequency (it also has dimensions of mass, charge, and curvature). The three dimensions of length come from the surface of the double-sphere (or double loxodrome, depending whether we are looking at its electrostatic structure or its magnetic structure) Aether unit and the distance between Aether units. In other words, space as we experience it is the condition created by adjacent, curved, quantum surfaces.

Matter begins when an Aether unit absorbs a string of mass (dark matter) to create a subatomic particle such as an electron or proton. Subatomic particles have half-spin, which means the particle is determined by the quadrant of the Aether unit that absorbs the dark matter. The only difference between empty space (Aether) and matter is that matter is an Aether unit with an absorbed string of mass. The structures of matter, and of empty Aether units, are the same, which is why matter can interact with space.

The spatial-temporal structure of the Aether unit is five-dimensional space-resonance. Resonance is frequency squared. The two frequencies of the Aether unit are forward/backward time, and right/left temporal spin. Subatomic particles, however, are half-spin structures and therefore have the effect of rectified forward/backward time (forward time in our world), and rectified right/left temporal spin (left spin in our world). The rectifying-nature of matter creates the subatomic particle’s spin in “forward time,” but the “backward time” mode is missing. Also the rectifying-nature of matter creates the condition where left temporal spin exists, but the right temporal spin mode is missing. The process is similar to rectified AC current that makes pulsed DC current, except that it applies to temporal existence.

While the subatomic particles see only space and forward time (we ignore the left spin component in our macro world because we can’t exist simultaneously with anti-matter), the Aether that it resides in continues to see its forward/backward time behavior. When time moves an equal portion forward and backward, it creates the “present.” The present is always right here and right now. In fact, our material world, despite its subatomic particles always advancing in rectified forward time, ever only exists in the present. Time is thus an illusion caused by the half-spin matter of electrons and protons. The present moment is caused by the Aether, and the illusion of time is created by the matter within it.

So how does space-time bend and interact with mass? Go back to the two magnets in your hand. The Aether units that give us space-resonance are connected magnetically, electrostatically, and gravitationally to subatomic particles, which are really just more Aether units, but which have absorbed a string of mass (dark matter absorbed by the Aether becomes visible matter). When subatomic particles such as electrons and protons bind into neutrons, atoms, molecules, cells, crystals, and other complex forms, these complex forms are still connected to the Aether. The protons, neutrons, and electrons of the magnets in your hand are dominantly magnetically aligned such that the adjacent empty Aether units continue the magnetic alignments and create magnetic fields in space. Thus matter is interacting with Aether, and space-time is a subset of the Aether that we choose to see. For a more in-depth and mathematical treatment of this discussion, you can read Secrets of the Aether, which is available free online.

David Thomson's answer to What are the various fields like quantum, electromagnetic, or electron fields made of, and how can they exist and stretch forever? Are there any large scale gaps in them? - Quora

2018-09-25T08:50:00.001-05:00

David Thomson's answer to What are the various fields like quantum, electromagnetic, or electron fields made of, and how can they exist and stretch forever? Are there any large scale gaps in them? - Quora:

'via Blog this'

Nuclear Fusion Power Could Be Here By 2030, One Company Says

2018-06-28T09:28:00.001-05:00

Nuclear Fusion Power Could Be Here By 2030, One Company Says:

This is my response, which I posted to the article:

Man, do they have it wrong! First, the Sun isn't just hydrogen and helium. Every star, and every hot planet, has a neutron core. Neutron core's are extremely radioactive. Astrophysicists know that after a supernova, when the main body of a star is blasted into space, a neutron core is all that survives. Our star is no different. Read the life work of Oliver Manuel to understand how stars are truly composed and how they actually operate.

Second, it takes a lot of energy to create and sustain these plasmas. The theory is that once the plasma get's started, it will be self-sustaining. Yet, the so-called fusion bombs were not self-sustaining. If they were, our planet would have turned into a mini star by now due to all the hydrogen bombs that were detonated.

Third, they have the physics wrong. Fusion is not a process where free floating atoms are stuck together through magnetic pinching. The Universe is not a giant Lego kit where scientists can put pieces together and make their own frankenstein. The Universe is a constantly creating machine of living processes, and not all life is cellular; life processes occur even at the subatomic level. The physics for creating matter has been touched on in the discovery and experiments relating to the Casimir effect, but the scientific community dismisses that the created matter is real. They call the created matter "virtual" because it doesn't fit with their limited postulates about how the Universe works. They can't fathom that the boundary of the Universe extends beyond physical matter and into non-material existence.

Fusion is a process similar to the Casimir effect, but it occurs between protons instead of electrons, and it occurs inside of atoms. There is no such thing as either fission or fusion, at least not as the concepts are envisioned by today's academics. Instead, there is a change of distance between protons inside the atom, which activates protons to vibrate the space between them and to generate a proton-sized photon. If there is an empty shell position inside the atom, the photon will be converted into a proton via an effect similar to the photoelectric effect (where a photon acts on a valence position in the outer shells of the atom to produce an electron). This added proton in the nucleus can either cause the atom to split, or it can generate another proton-sized photon inside the atom, but where much of the angular momentum escapes the nucleus and some of it produces an electron; the proton and electron then combine to produce a neutron.

In any case, the ideal situation for generating atomic reactions is inside heavy elements, and not in trying to stick two protons together in open space. And no matter how you make atomic reactions, you are always creating new matter and new energy. This is the mechanism that keeps the Universe expanding. It is also the mechanism that makes stars and planets grow in size over time. It is the mechanism whereby the Sun can release energy even as it grows over time. It is the mechanism that causes a nuclear reactor to produce more fuel than it consumes (bet you didn't know that, because this information is kept secret). At the root of it all, all matter is bred by converting dark matter into visible matter.

Scientists know that the mass of most galaxies is mostly due to dark matter, and they know that the Universe is expanding, and they know that nuclear reactors produce more fuel (more mass) than they consume, and they know the Earth and Stars are growing from within, and they know the Casimir effect generates lots of new photons and electrons, and yet they still can't put the pieces of the physics puzzle together right. Seventy years of fusion research failure is not enough to make them look at alternative theories. And yet, I have figured out the simple dimensinal analysis and Newtonian force equations that show how this all works.

The old-timer scientists are a lost cause, but I hope that younger and more open minds will someday look more closely at my work, and help me fix all the mistakes made during the past 100 years by paternalistic, masters of the Universe egos. You can read my work at sota.aetherwizard.com.

(12) David Thomson's answer to If there are 4 forces in nature, why not just one? Can anyone unify gravity, electric -magnetic force, the strong/weak nuclear force of nature. - Quora

2018-06-04T22:49:00.001-05:00

(12) David Thomson's answer to If there are 4 forces in nature, why not just one? Can anyone unify gravity, electric -magnetic force, the strong/weak nuclear force of nature. - Quora:

'via Blog this'

David Thomson's answer to What is an electron probability cloud? - Quora

2018-05-30T10:40:00.001-05:00

Modern physics is stuck in the four-dimensional perspective of space-time due to their reliance on four-dimensional instrumentation. Although the data from a four dimensional perspective is useful and valid, it needs to be conceptualized from a five-dimensional perspective to be fully understood.

David Thomson's answer to What is an electron probability cloud? - Quora:

'via Blog this'

What Can the Death of a Neutron Tell Us About Dark Matter?

2018-05-19T11:00:00.001-05:00

I don't understand why they (physicists) don't admit that anti-neutrinos are dark matter? When a neutron decays, the total angular momentum of the neutron, minus the angular momenta of the resulting proton and electron, leaves an angular momentum value equal to about 1.5 times the angular momentum of the electron. This angular momentum that is 1.5 times the angular momentum of the electron is the anti-neutrino.

I explain this in greater detail in Secrets of the Aether under the subheading of Neutrino.

The fact that a particle with more mass than the electron just disappears without interacting further with visible matter is very strong evidence for dark matter. This is exactly how dark matter is expected to behave. So why is the anti-neutrino not considered to be dark matter?

What Can the Death of a Neutron Tell Us About Dark Matter?:

'via Blog this'

On the Importance of the Five Dimensional Aether in Understanding Reality

2018-04-02T10:18:00.003-05:00

Max:
Why Do Interpretations Of Quantum Physics Matter?

A couple of weeks ago, fellow Forbes blogger Ethan Siegel took to his keyboard with the goal of making me sigh heavily, writing a post about interpretations of quantum physics calling the idea that you need an interpretation "the biggest myth in quantum physics." Ethan's argument boils down to noting that all of the viable interpretations known at present make identical predictions about the probability of getting particular outcomes for any experiment we might do. Therefore, according to Ethan, there's no need for any interpretation, because it doesn't really matter which of them you choose.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2018/02/27/why-do-interpretations-of-quantum-physics-matter/#7f7246fb7d57

There is no viable logic in his article if the foundations of the physics he uses to interpret an experiment are in error. For example, what if the whole paradigm of particles and waves as descriptors of the structures of subatomic particles is flawed and just plain incorrect? What if a subatomic particle's structure is actually a quasi-material structure that we could call, "primary angular momentum?" Such a structure could exist if the structure of space (Aether) is a five-dimenstional (3L / 2T) quantum rotating magnetic field and the subatomic particle is merely a string of mass (dark matter) caught up in the quantum rotating magnetic field. Thus dark matter would be "converted" to appear as visible matter, particularly if the quantum rotating magnetic field structure imparted the properties of electrostatic and magnetic charge to the string of mass.

A string of mass moving at a velocity through this quantum rotating magnetic field in a five dimensional frame of reference could easily be mistaken for being either a particle or a wave, especially to a bunch of mathematicians ignorant of the actual structure of the subatomic particles and the five-dimensional reference frame they exist in.

The weirdness of the Standard Model is rooted in the limited choice between particle and wave, and the ignorance if the other temporal dimension. In fact, the ignorance of the Standard Model is further rooted in the incomplete understanding of the temporal nature of the Universe. Time is just a subset of a greater collection of temporal attributes, just as length and area are a subset of "volume." The temporal dimensions as a whole are what physicists refer to as "spin." This "spin" has a forward AND backward time frequency as well as a right and left spin direction. Due to the half spin nature of the electron and proton, subatomic particles only "see" a single time direction and a single spin direction. The space (Aether unit) that contains the subatomic particle, however, sees a two spin point of view, which forever oscillates between forward and backward time, and right and left spin, at an extreme (and quantifiable) frequency.

It is the half spin of subatomic particles that gives matter the appearance of moving in the forward direction of time. And yet, despite the forward advance in time associated with matter, our mind always remains right here and right now... in the present. Our mind is the reference point that perceives the advancement of time. The mind does not move through time; it ever remains in the present, and in the exact same present as every other mind.

In the Standard Model, time is believed to be an independent metric, and it is also believed our mind traverses through time along with matter. The spin nature of subatomic particles is considered "weird" and is subsequently discarded from our understanding. Also, the concept of Aether is discarded as being unnecessary because four-dimensional, forward-time matter has been arbitrarily chosen as the only reality the physicists are interested in. Aside from the fact that evidence for the Aether's existence abounds in physics, the Aether as a five-dimensional coordinate system is required in order to understand the hidden aspects of quantum structure and also quantum mechanics.

The problem with physics isn't the physics, it is the physicists, and it always has been. All of humanity is living in a deep ignorance concerning the true nature of our four-dimensional realm. To get a glimpse of this perspective, imagine life in a television world. Television worlds are three-dimensional, having two dimensions of length and one dimension of time. The characters live out a scripted life written from players in the four-dimensional world of space-time. Well, our four-dimensional lives are written by players in the five-dimensional realm of space-resonance. All those players in our four-dimensional world who claim to see ghosts, spirit guides, and angels, and who practice religions based on the afterlife, and who practice magic or experience paranormal events, they are all interacting with, or merely believing in, the greater five dimensional realm. And just as our four-dimensional world seems infinitely more vast than the area-time television world, the five dimensional realm is infinitely more vast than our four-dimensional, space-time realm.

The Rosetta Stone for understanding this greater five-dimensional realm is quantum physics, but we will never make progress in this understanding as long as physicists continue with their nonsense of probability functions as subatomic particles, and their flat out denial of Aether.

More about the Aether that isn't an Aether.

2018-03-17T07:55:00.001-05:00

Here we are, back to scientists describing the Aether that isn't an Aether. 

"...empty space isn't really empty, but instead populated with 'virtual particles.' These particles are artifacts of the fact, described by quantum mechanics, that physics is governed more by probabilities than fixed realities. Because of the small possibility that a particle might exist in any one empty point in space, that empty point in space acts as if the particle is sort of, kind of there. And those virtual particles have real effects on the world."

Since when does a mathematical probability function become a physical fact in the real Universe? What the scientists are not saying, and which the real facts allude, is that there is a very real, non-material structure to the fabric of space. Space is not a physical substance, like matter, but rather a non-material structure that gives rise to magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, and gravitational fields (all of which are non-material realities). Even the spin property of subatomic particles, and the speed limit of light are functions of the space the subatomic particles reside in. 

What the scientists are close to discovering is that black holes are not physical objects such as the much touted super massive black holes, but rather black holes are regions near the centers of galaxies where the structure of space collapses, and visible matter is converted to dark matter. And yes, space can become (and is) polarized in such a way as to prevent the entire galaxy from unraveling. 

Most images of black holes are illustrations. Here’s what our telescopes actually capture. - Vox

2018-01-10T14:59:00.001-06:00

Astrophysicists believe the only viable explanation for black holes is that there has to be a super massive, highly condensed piece of matter hidden in space.

This is not the only explanation, and neither is it the best explanation. The best explanation is that at the centers of galaxies space is unraveling. Space has structure, which is quantifiable, as I have shown in Secrets of the Aether. When space becomes too dense, it just unravels, and it unravels any matter that is within it. The unraveled matter converts from visible matter to dark matter, and radiates outward from the center of the galaxy as neutrinos.

Think of a large bathtub with a drain. As the water goes down the drain, all the other water in the tub migrates toward the drain. If there is something floating in the water, it may get close to the vortex of the drain, and be shot back out before actually heading straight into the vortex at a later time. This gives the appearance of being gravitationally attracted toward the vortex. You can imagine the vortex of a bathtub as having imaginary mass and design a whole set of equations to explain the action of the vortex in terms of Newton's gravitational laws. But this would be nothing more than an imaginary exercise, even though the math will work.

There are no super massive black bodies in the centers of galaxies. There is a drain of space, and every star is migrating toward the drain, which explains the inward spiral nature of galaxies and the observed behavior of stars "orbiting" the center.

They are still trying to detect gravitational waves using interferometers.

2015-07-30T18:55:00.001-05:00

More money wasted and more disappointments on the way. This observatory is supposed to detect gravitational waves by measuring minute fluctuations in laser beams shooting over long distances. The gravitational waves are said to be ripples in the fabric of space-time, however, modern physics denies that space-time has structure that can ripple. If it did, it would fit the description of the Aether, which mainstream academia emphatically denies.

The interferometer won't work because the space the laser beam is moving through, as well as the laser beam, will both ripple at the same time. It is like trying to knock a cowboy off his horse in a movie shown on a flexible screen TV by flexing the screen.

In order to detect gravitational waves, the detector has to be a large magnetic field with magnetic flux lines stressed to the breaking point. When a gravitational wave comes through, it would break the magnetic flux lines. The more flux lines broken, the more intense the gravitational wave.

Magnetic fields can detect gravitational waves because they actually exist in a five dimensional space-resonance coordinate system, which is the true coordinate system of the "fabric of space-time." Space-time is a subset of space-resonance and only has four dimensions.

Physical matter exists in space-time, but not in space-resonance. Only photons and magnetic fields exist in all five dimensions, which are length cubed by frequency squared (resonance). Similarly, a movie exists in area-time while the audience exists in space-time. If someone existing in area-time tried to build an interferometer, it could never reach out to detect space-time any more than an interferometer in space-time can detect movement in space-resonance.

The incredibly redundant article below appears to be nothing more than a press release explaining why millions of dollars was spent. The science is worthless.

Dense star clusters shown to be binary black hole factories: Study predicts observatories to detect more merging black holes than previously thought -- ScienceDaily:

Evidence of matter being contained in space!

2015-06-30T09:22:00.001-05:00

One of the important revelations of the Aether Physics Model is that visible physical matter is a product of Aether and dark matter. Aether is the structure of space; it is not merely empty, but is a five dimensional vortex having the unit of "rotating magnetic field." Strings of mass, known in physics as neutrinos and dark matter, become encapsulated in an Aether vortex to become subatomic particles such as electrons and protons.

The fact that photons, which are inverted electrons expanding outward at the speed of photons, share the same quantum hall effect behavior with electrons indicates they share a common structure. This structure is caused by the space in which photons and electrons reside, which is the Aether. In fact, most of the electron structure is the Aether, itself, which is why there are relatively vast spaces between subatomic particles.

'via Blog this'

Landmark study proves that magnets can control heat and sound | News Room - The Ohio State University

2015-03-26T09:26:00.001-05:00

Landmark study proves that magnets can control heat and sound | News Room - The Ohio State University

The topic of phonons is interesting from an Aether perspective. Phonons are considered to be similar to photons in that phonons are to sound (and heat) as photons are to radio waves.

Phonons and photons are both seen as "massless" particles that carry momentum. When talking about massless particles carrying momentum, scientists are describing the qualities of absolute space, or Aether.

Magnetic fields are another example of structured Aether. Magnetic fields have no substance in the sense of physical matter, and yet they readily act on physical matter and other magnetic fields. The scientists at Ohio State University are learning that magnetic fields (which are structures of Aether) can affect individual units of Aether (phonons).

It is amusing to watch the deniers of Aether continually discover the properties of Aether and its practical uses in physics.

Geophysicists Discover How Rocks Produce Magnetic Pulses — The Physics arXiv Blog — Medium

2014-06-05T11:45:00.001-05:00

Geophysicists Discover How Rocks Produce Magnetic Pulses

The "electron pair holes" and "positive holes" described in semiconductor physics and mentioned in the above article is just another way of discussing Aether.

In order for a "hole" or "empty space" to possess charge, that space must have structure and obey mechanical laws. Such a structure can hardly be called non-existent or imaginary. It is a very real structure even if it is non-material in nature.

In several areas of physics, the existence of Aether is denied despite the observations of magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, gravitational fields, frame dragging, positive holes, electron pair holes, solitons, space-time curvature, and numerous other measurable phenomena.

Double Flares May Offer Insights to Tunneling

2014-03-21T07:50:00.001-05:00

The article, Double Flare, on spaceweather.com is an interesting story and I believe it offers insight into what happens with magnetism at the quantum scale.

Just as two sunspots can be connected by a seemingly invisible magnetic loop, magnetic structures at all scales can connect in similar ways.

In the Aether Physics Model, I show a simplified structural model for a quantum of space (Aether unit) and also for quantum particles such as the electron and proton. Aether units are essentially perpetual, dynamic rotating magnetic fields. The rotating magnetic field manifests as a tube of magnetic flux. These magnetic flux tubes can form macro structures, similar to water molecules forming oceans.

Further, tubes of magnetic flux can stretch over great distances causing various magnetic structures to be connected. To some degree, all things throughout the Universe are magnetically connected but at various magnitudes.

Certain systems, such as a human body, likely have very rich magnetic connections among its parts even if the magnetic fields are relatively weak compared to other magnetic fields. The magnetism need not manifest as a single coherent magnetic field such as in a permanent magnet or sunspot connections, but biomagnetism could exist as a network of much weaker magnetic fields. Each cell in the body, and each molecule in each cell, is likely in communication with and connected to each other, much like the sunspots on the Sun.

I like how the article starts, "Long ago researchers thought solar flares were isolated events." This is another way of saying, "Mainstream science had it wrong just ten years ago." There is nothing bad about being wrong, but it is another reminder that mainstream science paradigms have a long way to go before they can be considered accurate models of reality.

Yellowstone Releasing Ancient Helium, Scientists Discover

2014-02-19T17:39:00.001-06:00

Yellowstone Releasing Ancient Helium, Scientists Discover:

This is an interesting story. The facts are that more helium than is expected is coming up from Yellowstone volcano. The article is written such that it sounds like an absolute certainty that this helium is millions, if not billions of years old, as though this could be ascertained.

Let us assume, however, that the helium has been recently produced deep in the Earth. The evidence to suggest this assumption is that the Earth is measured to be expanding by 19 cubic kilometers of material per year, and numerous volcanoes all around the planet have awakened from 10,000 year dormancy, and other volcanoes are erupting more than usual.

This may actually suggest the Earth is going through a phase of rapid matter generation deep underground. The exceptionally high helium production shows that processes generating new protons are occurring all around the planet.

It is my suspicion that a rapid material production is occurring due to a change in the density of space as the Earth passes through the Milky Way magnetic plane. This causes the distance between protons in certain atoms to move within range to generate new protons from the Aether.

Mainstream physics only recognizes this process with regard to electrons, however, I have a mathematical basis for suspecting that protons produce proton-sized photons inside atoms during hot and cold fusion processes. The increase of helium could very well be evidence in favor of my physics theories.

Amazing! First ever photograph inside a hydrogen atom | Fox News

2013-05-30T10:15:00.001-05:00

Be careful of what is published as fact.

Amazing! First ever photograph inside a hydrogen atom | Fox News:

There is a problem with this photo. The electron is not a particle and neither is it a wave. It merely behaves as both simultaneously. The electron's actual structure is characterized by the unit of angular momentum. The photo represents the assumptions of the scientists and not an actual image of an atom. The photo is a computer generated image based upon interpretations of interference patterns. If the interpretation assumptions are changed, then the photo will change, too.

A second Higgs boson? Physicists debate new particle

2013-04-15T11:20:00.001-05:00

It seems that every month there is someone trying to baffle the world with bullshit with regard to science. Whether it be about the latest energy field tunneling through the (name a scientist) plasma causing black holes to emerge dark matter particles, or dark matter energy fields flowing through the (name a scientist) plasma induced black holes, or the black hole plasma field of the (name a scientist) field causing dark matter particles, people seem to soak it up as though they understand it because Joe Schmoe understands it.

Here is the latest nonsense being served in the mass media:

Physicists confirmed in March that a new particle discovered at the world's largest atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), is, in fact, the Higgs boson. This particle, which weighs about 126 times the mass of a proton, appears to fit the Standard Model of physics, the dominant theory of particle physics. In this model, the Higgs boson is related to the Higgs field, an energy field that pervades space and is thought to imbue many particles with mass. The thinking goes that just as swimmers would get wet moving through a pool, as particles move through the Higgs field they would gain mass.
Read more:

The usual Higgs nonsense about an invisible particle with 126 times the mass of the proton was discovered by a 10 billion dollar science experiment leads the reader to discover that there may be up to five flavors of these massive and invisible particles. Presumably, these theoretical particles are just in reach of our understanding if we can spend just X billion dollars more.

This certainly ranks among the biggest frauds in humanity. Not only does this science make no sense (as does most of modern fundamental physics), but it is blatantly obvious that the scientists are seeing whatever they need to see in order to keep the paychecks flowing.

The idea that a massless thing gains mass by moving through an empty space of mass is an obvious logical fallacy. To begin with, a massless thing can have no momentum to displace something with mass. The idea that mass is something that moves at all is also a fallacy since mass is a property of something, just as is length. To illustrate this, hold up two fingers in front of you. The distance between those two fingers has length. The length is measurable even if there is no physical object between the fingers. Length is a property, not a physical thing.

Mass is a property. Mass gives matter its momentum, but matter is not mass and mass is not matter. Mass is a non-material idea. There is no imaginary or real particle that gives a thing its mass. It simply is. The idea of the Higgs Boson is a fairy tale ... a fantasy. There is no particle or field that gives anything the property of mass.

The proton certainly does not get its mass from something 126 times greater in magnitude than itself. What do the scientists say happens to the rest of the 125 parts of the Higgs Boson? Why is something of greater magnitude harder to see than something of lesser magnitude?

And then there is the perennial nonsense of the "energy field." Energy is merely a unit of work. What specifically is working to produce this energetic field? If they are saying the energy is inherent to the field, then they are talking about an Aether. And if they are going to talk about an Aether, they need to quantify this Aether and show how it relates to matter. This is exactly what the Aether Physics Model is about.

However, the Aether Physics Model is very simple and fully explained in Classical Mechanics terms. The fundamental forces are unified simply using Newtonian type equations. There is no need to waste billions of dollars trying to prop a failed particle zoo when more useful results can be obtained for much less investment.

Calculations of the Unified Force Theory

2012-09-10T12:52:00.000-05:00

One of my papers, Calculations of the Unified Force Theory, has been entered into a contest at FQXi.org. The winning essay will be published in Scientific American. For those who are interested, the paper can be viewed at:
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1531

There is also an opportunity for readers to vote on the paper and post comments.

The Higgs Boson (Field) is a Massive Fraud

2012-07-04T10:27:00.001-05:00

Understanding the Higgs boson | Cutting Edge - CNET News:

This is absurdity to the extreme. They are saying the Higgs is both a boson (particle) and field (space). Now in addition to wave/particle duality we have space/particle duality. An object can be both a thing and the space it occupies at the same time. They have now defined space as matter, or at least as the source of matter. Actually, what they have done is sunk deeper into the cloud of ignorance in order to justify spending billions of dollars on a failed experiment.

Let me also put it to you another way. They are saying that some cosmic process is using cosmic construction paper for cutting out a particle that wastes more than 99% of the paper. That is what a proton is to the Standard Model. What happens to the rest of the Higgs field and why does it not affect macro matter if it can affect quantum matter? When 1% of the Higgs is used to make a proton, what happens to the other 99%?

If that 99% produces another proton, then the Higgs obviously no longer has the mass discovered by CERN! If that 99% does not produce a proton, it means there is a lot of unused Higgs field that can affect other protons. The logic clearly does not work.

They have not only "discovered" a new particle, they have "discovered" a whole new reality that is nothing like the reality the rest of the world experiences.

What's more, this Higgs field is said to be the source of mass. Mass is a dimension, like length and time. It is not a physical object. Just look at any unit. The unit of energy is equal to mass times length squared divided by time squared. Mass is not a field any more than length is a field; or time is a field.

When you see how big the CERN facility is and how many people work there, you can see that the outcome was predetermined. A study should be commissioned The Hto examine how many people had to be demoted and fired in order for the data to produce positive results.

The Big Bang didn't need God to start universe, researchers say | Fox News

2012-06-25T12:10:00.001-05:00

The Big Bang didn't need God to start universe, researchers say | Fox News:

Here is another moronic story about physics. This one, however, has a clever "red herring" twist.

Our universe could have popped into existence 13.7 billion years ago without any divine help whatsoever, researchers say.
That may run counter to our instincts, which recoil at the thought of something coming from nothing. But we shouldn't necessarily trust our instincts, for they were honed to help us survive on the African savannah 150,000 years ago, not understand the inner workings of the universe.
Instead, scientists say, we should trust the laws of physics.

The keyword here is "instincts." They make it sound like anybody who is not a physicist is looking at the world from some kind of primal feeling perspective. The idea of the Universe suddenly popping into existence 13.7 billion years ago actually runs counter to our intelligence.

The same physicists who believe in the Big Bang theory are also the same physicists who religiously promote the idea that matter can not be either created or destroyed. These are the same physicists who believe the Universe is accurately explained by both Relativity theories and Quantum Mechanics; theories that make opposite predictions.

With a proper physics paradigm (and not the Standard Model paradigm) we can see that matter is constantly being created and destroyed, which is why the Universe is expanding in some places and contracting in others. As such, there is about 13.7 billion years worth of matter, or in other words, it takes about 13.7 billion years on average for created matter to migrate to the center of a galaxy and disappear. This would mean the Universe is eternal; always being both created and destroyed.

On the issue of God, God does show up in the physics. All the fundamental forces of nature (electric, magnetic, and gravitational) reduce to a common factor, which is the Gforce. The Gforce appears to be an all pervading, all encompassing, reciprocal force that drives the entire Universe. It is the Will that perpetually keeps the Universe in its dynamic state. Call it "God," or not, it does exist and it is part of the science of physics.

New Quantum Computing Algorithm Could Simulate Giant Particle Accelerators

2012-06-12T18:52:00.001-05:00

New Quantum Computing Algorithm Could Simulate Giant Particle Accelerators:

"We believe this work could apply to the entire standard model of physics," Jordan says. "It could allow quantum computers to serve as a sort of wind tunnel for testing ideas that often require accelerators today."

Science as we know it is coming to an end. Instead of observing nature to figure out how the Universe works, NIST is working on a computer program, which will tell nature how it should work according to the Standard Model of Particle Physics.

Forget the fact that there are several contradictory physics theories presently in use, which physicists must choose among in order to get the results they are looking for. Forget the fact that most of particle physics is strictly a mathematical model of energy flow rather than a physical model of actual particle structure. Forget the fact that physics is filled with nonsense such as a particle being its own wave, a particle of force, a particle of energy, a particle of mass, and imaginary and unseen particles. The guys at NIST are so smart they can write equations that tell us precisely how unseen particles are behaving. And when they look at their results, we can bet they will find exactly what they were looking for.

CERN is already a colossal waste of money that is not showing physicists what they want to see. They are looking for the particle of mass they call the Higgs Boson, and it isn't there. The reason for this is quite simple, mass is not matter or energy. Mass is a dimension, much like length and time. The problem is not the particle accelerators they are building, the problem is the theories they are working with. The theories are fundamentally wrong despite their "successes."

The Standard Model theories don't work, therefore their reasoning is that there must be something wrong with nature. So why waste money on expensive particle accelerators only to have nature not cooperate? They can bypass nature altogether and write the scripts of reality, themselves.

The Aether Physics Model is the only physics paradigm that models the structures of the quantum realm based directly on the physical measurements of Classical Physics. If NIST would look at the Aether Physics Model, they would get a proper perspective of reality, and they would be able to model quantum structures and mechanics very accurately.