Agile Flux

Google+ as Social Media for your Enterprise?

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:39:00 +0000

Google launched its potential "Facebook killer" yesterday. It is taking the invite only approach for now (wise due to issues with the Buzz launch last year). I keyed into Google+'s potential for Google Apps and the usability of this social media app within an organization. Without getting into all the collaborative and communication and info sharing goodness that social media brings, Google may have be onto something that no other social media solution can even comprehend.

Most organizations now understand the the power of social media. Some use it for customer outreach, others use it internally, while others may do both. Google Apps states 3 million businesses are using its solution and they recently opened all Google products to Google Apps deployments. It only makes sense that Google+ will eventually be available to organizations. For example, Montana may get an out of the box social media solution soon. Couple this Android and iOS apps as well as dead simple ease of use and you have a winner.

Time will tell. Imagine the possibilities for "enterprises" large and small across Google Apps' current and future customer base? No other social media product or enterprise solution provides what Google Apps may very well be providing in the very near future.

UPDATE - 8July2011:

Just read a 5July post from the guys at Google Operating System. Seems Google+ (and necessarily Profiles) is on the way for Google Apps domains. Google is unto something big here.

Google Operating System is a rock solid source for news / updates.
Check them out on twitter as well: @googleos

21st Century Battle Command Training is "Infield Practice"

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:58:00 +0000

The latest edition of the US Army's Engineer Professional Bulletin contains an article I composed about the Fort Bragg BCTC's training solutions and their applicability in a Battle Command environment.

Thanks to Engineer for the opportunity to contribute to a such a great professional journal!

Direct Link: 21st Century Battle Command Training is "Infield Practice"

Entire Edition: US Army Engineer Professional Bulletin (Sep - Dec 2010)

DIKW is the backbone of KM

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:49:00 +0000

I have been reading about a construct called DIKW (Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom). This is a very simple methodology and makes a lot of sense. Also known as the Wisdom Hierarchy, this is sometimes defined as a a chain or pyramid, however, in today's data rich environment's I prefer to look at DIKW as a continuum or cycle that is never ending. This post is by no means a statement of the perfect KM solution - merely an additional consideration.

We use buzz words all the time. Collaboration, Productivity are easy to pick on. What do they really mean? The ability to create a document? Post it to a portal of some sort? Email or chat with someone about the posted document? In the US Army, we tend to emplace systems and abruptly state "We do KM". The presence of SharePoint does not equal organization KM. Database systems and spreadsheets certainly provide functional tools for our data and most individuals / organizations make information out of data (charts and tables are easy). The software tools we use are extremely important (many of our current tools are lacking but that would make for another post entirely).

The hurdle in DIKW is Knowledge then Wisdom. We must put all that data rich information to use and apply it to our processes and procedures to shape a knowledge base. The information is perceived and reasoned with as we begin forming knowledge and eventually we begin to gain wisdom as we apply knowledge to the way we operate and collaborate as individuals and teams. That is all well and good for a "text book" definition.

What about the real world? I like DIKW's simplicity for gauging where I am and where my team is. One can apply this to an overall effort or even components of the overall effort.

Are you processing and presenting data as information?
Are you providing information in an organized manner within operational procedures as knowledge?
Are you building wisdom?
Is your team collectively processing and presenting data as information?
Is your team collectively providing information in an organized manner within procedures as knowledge? Does it shape the way you operate?
Is your team collectively building wisdom and using it in strategy?

I believe DIKW is the backbone of Knowledge Management (KM). This gives every KM Officer, KM System Manager and even the actual Knowledge Workers a simple tool to guide their work and honestly measure the achievement of KM's real goals.

What do you think?

Bits: Ushahidi Crowdmap, Productivity Suites

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:24:00 +0000

Ushahidi: Ushahidi means testimony in Swahili. This crisis mapping technology was brought bear by an African organization amid the turmoil after the Kenyan elections of 2008. This is a platform for crowd sourcing SA - a capability to provide a means for any and all people in an area to contribute information about events in a particular area. The platform found huge success in the aftermath of the earthquake in Haiti. A new offering from Ushahidi, Crowdmap, is a thin client version to be stood up and deployed rapidly by end users anywhere via the commercial internet. Imagine locals, local government and NGOs being able to add incident information to Crowdmap amid a crisis. Note that CrowdMap is cell phone SMS capable (this is significant in disaster areas and 3rd world regions). Powerful stuff.
Productivity Suites: Word processors, spreadsheets, and presentation software have long been grouped and called Productivity software (a relic term from pre-Web 2.0 of course). I have always been amazed by the government and military use of MS Office with its huge licensing costs and maintenance). Most End Users of productivity suites only use the bare bones essential functions - even if they are PowerPoint Ranger tabbed. Why pay big fees for a ton of functionality when cost effective solutions are available? Open Office has been around for quite sometime, offers a very robust desktop productivity suite and is free. In the web based realm, Zoho's "fake Office" solution and Google's Apps for Gov would meet the need, provide huge cost savings and, arguably, increase End User / Team productivity! Need I say more?

Apps4Army means more than the Apps alone

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:24:00 +0000

The US Army CIO/G6 is on the cusp of shattering a paradigm.

Lack of interoperability, high SW license costs, high specialized HW costs, proprietary code, high Dev / FSR support costs and, last but not least, poor UIs have hindered our Army's Battle Command (BC) capabilities for years. The non-POR rise has taken hold and in many ways surpassed the POR offerings (CIDNE, TIGR, Axis Pro, JADOCS anyone? - Not to mention CPOF came directly from DARPA as a non-POR). The CIO/G6 is posturing to align BC capabilities with commercial market offerings and change the combat / material developer.

Apps4Army is a game changer not because of the initial winning apps but because it has proven the Army may move forward with the "new" plan. Build apps - web (thin, thick), mobile and mobile native apps - in line with the Army's approved SDKs and APIs - and do it on 30/60 day dev / launch cycles. WIN-T (Increment 2 and beyond) will serve as an enabler to provide War-Fighters a ubiquitous network, robust bandwidth and hardware agnostic access to the cloud based services as well as authoritative data sources. End-User experience with "capabilities" will further catalyze this initiative as network permeation throughout Army echelons continues. In short order, the Army may be able to assemble mission specific apps in an on demand manner. This is End-User empowerment.

To see the existing mobile apps now, go to the US Army Marketplace (with CAC card). Some apps are available through Apple App store and Android Market. The BC environment is going to get real interesting in the very near future.

A win / win - "Google Apps for Gov"

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:43:00 +0000

Google's launch of Google Apps for Gov is a huge step in the right direction for End-Users (and the budget). Until now, it seems the gov has merely been dipping its toes in the Web2.0 waters. Use of Social media has skyrocketed, but full on adoption of new age web capabilities is a rarity. This may be the belly flop off the high dive needed to serve as a catalyst.

A few key points on Google Apps for Gov:

FISMA certification, a private cloud based on US soil and additional security measures.
At $50 per user per year, this is huge savings in licensing fees of traditional enterprise capabilities (HW and SW).
Google Apps and its WYSIWYG characteristics are well suited to more than meet the needs of most government agencies (fed, state and local).
Google Apps use readily enables hardware agnostic as well as mobile use.
Rapid adoption and integration of new apps such as Google Wave, Marketplace apps.
The Navy is already using Google Apps (on a .com) for InRelief - one can only wonder if more .mil adoptions will occur.
Is Chrome OS next?
Microsoft is shaking in their boots.

This is a win / win situation. Gov budgets are tight and gov Knowledge Workers are disgusted with outdated and out paced software tools (read MS Office, MS SharePoint, MS Exchange, MS etc). This capability is now wide open for the .gov domain and may very well take over the landscape - I would not be surprised if swarms of government entities rapidly adopt this solution.

For more details, read PC World's story.

Enable US Army Knowledge Workers

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:30:00 +0000

I recently had the thought (and shared)...

"Good Knowledge Workers blur this line: Creating/enabling then DOING with IT tools."

Here is an expansion on that thought in the context of US Army IT End Users...

3 simple facts:

GUIs were first established to empower End-Users (and sell computers to the masses). End-Users now had a huge array of software that could be used, but make it do much more, a user had to consult the programmers.
YouTube taught a generation about URLs and HTML. These are terms and concepts once relegated to developers and technicians. This has forever changed the landscape. Technical terms, concepts and sharing have become the norm.
There is a huge difference between SharePoint and Google Sites. Beyond primitive read, upload, download, you need a CS degree to do simple back-end stuff (and a lot of licensing money) in SP. You only need to be literate to find huge success in Google Apps. I chose this example, but everyone has their own examples of this. Same comparisons could be made for ATCCS, ABCS and New Age Non-POR systems.

Knowledge Workers (War-Fighters included) toe the line between developing, tweaking IT tools and using these tools in the daily execution of their work. These are trained experts in a field using IT tools they have been trained on to execute their mission, they then become the experts to consult on development of said tools (no different in the Mil, Gov, Civilian or Private sectors). These experts are thirsty for info and new tools to use. This thirst leads to wanting inter-operable tools to mash-up and tweak for their own peculiar use. The current state of commercially available OS, desktop apps, web apps and social media generally meet this need. Knowledge workers like GUIs and understand the underlying "nuts and bolts" to a certain extent (that is why lack of interoperability upsets them - they are just smart enough). To be quite honest - if the GUI does not work / makes no sense, if they cannot import info from an authoritative data source, if they cannot export correctly... they do not use it (US Army POR and Non-POR system use comes to mind - the guys behind TIGR back in the dark ages just may epitomize this).

Developers must remember the audience - the End User. Do not get freaked out because your business model is changing, make your money now from use NOT maintenance. Build it on the back end, provide authoritative data sources and let the End-User control and USE the front end. Handle the code, data sources, SDKs and APIs but allow GUI based app creation and intuitive user interfaces too. Military endeavors are paying close attention to this. The US Army Enterprise initiative is moving forward rapidly. I believe they are on track with planned permeation of network and enterprise capabilities, but apps may suffer due to uphill fights with entrenched IT contracts (we should not need a zillion Field Service Representatives (FSR) for each system / app like the Verizon Network commercials).

Every single War-Fighter is a Knowledge Worker and their IT use is getting ready to explode (imagine the first time you saw the Internet and now your use of it today). They will have it in their barracks, offices, TOCs and pockets. This is bigger than the Knowledge Management Officer (KMO) deal. Industry must make IT capabilities unique, useful, application based, inter-operable, standard, data portable, web based, mobile, synchronized and off-line capable - give them what is now the standard Knowledge Workers.

Bits: Cloud Storage, RSS

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:51:00 +0000

Cloud Storage: These days cloud computing is all the rage within DOD IT and rightfully so. Access to the same info from multiple devices - anytime, anywhere - always in sync. We are all familiar with web apps for various capabilities such as email, calendar, social media and even banking. One critical capability for End-Users to fully employ the cloud is file storage and I do not mean a wiki or SharePoint Portal type of application. I mean full on file storage and sync - a capability whereas End-Users may work with their files as intended on a local device and sync via the cloud to other devices. Any enterprise worth its salt and wishing full adoption must allocate "cloud drive space" for users and make this capability available. Bliss for End-Users is local storage (for times when there is zero connectivity), web based editing and web access to files. Examples include Live Mesh, Syncplicity, Memeo Connect and even Offisync.
RSS Reader: Where do I start with RSS and RSS Readers? I once said this was how one could control information, make information work for you (instead of you working for it) and I am sticking to that. Numerous web apps, blogs, maps, alerts, update notifications, invites - End-Users need a tool to provide a capability to funnel notifications and info to a single interface for ingestion and re-distribution (the Inbox is not the place). GeoRSS is also on the rise (but thats a discussion for another time). Secure enterprises, such as AKO/DKO need to address this and provide a web based open and secure authenticated feed capability. Google Reader is the preeminent web based reader and may be synced with 3rd party desktop and mobile apps (RSS via Outlook and IE is pitiful). Once End-Users realize the benefits of RSS, there is no turning back. Even though NEC (DOIM) may be blocking this link for many of you, check out my brief on RSS from 2008 for some visuals - its old, but still holds true.

Bits: Google Voice, milSuite, DCO

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:23:00 +0000

Google Voice: Part of the Army CIO/G6 enterprise strategy is to provide End-Users a single email address AND phone number. Check out Google Voice to see what that capability may be like - sign up is open to everyone now.
milSuite: Social Media (SM) has changed the communications landscape and the US Army is leading the DOD to operationalize SM via the milSuite capability from PEO-C3T MilTech Solutions. You like Facebook, Wikipedia and Blogs? Check out milSuite. Rumor has it: milSuite may go Joint and may be adding milTube in the future - its already a killer capability. AKO/DKO Login required.
Defense Connect Online (DCO): Enterprise version of Adobe Connect web-conferencing via AKO/DKO (another MilTech Solutions service) has been around since Button 1 and 2. There are currently a lot of stand-alone Connect servers in TOCs, but as the network matures and permeates, more and more users in the tactical environment will be able to access and use DCO proper. AKO/DKO Login and DCO login required. Also try Adobe's commercial light version - Connect Now.

Enterprise Email is GNEC Linchpin

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:54:00 +0000

The US Army is going back to the drawing board with its enterprise email ambitions (reported by FCW on 28Jun10).

This enterprise email "campaign" is about much more than a single web based email account for soldiers to access anywhere in the world - it may very well be the linchpin for Global Network Enterprise Construct (GNEC) ambitions.

Right now, many Army users potentially have a minimum of 3 email accounts and they may or may not be linked and accessible from anywhere in the world: AKO (web based), local NEC (Outlook or Blackberry), and a tactical Exchange account (TOC based Outlook client). Of course you must necessarily duplicate this to a certain extent for SIPR side. Some AKO/DKO capabilities require yet another username for access. Multiple accounts and lack of access from anywhere goes against everything we know to be capable, productive and required in 2010.

What the Army is really after is a Single Sign On (SSO) - access to multiple enterprise based capabilities. Single email is really a single GNEC username. A singular username enables true cloud computing for information assurance, facilitates mobile adoption and does away with static IP addresses. All this via the rapidly maturing AKO/DKO Portal and a ubiquitous WIN-T network capability while addressing scalability and security. This is the enterprise capability for BPM / Battle Command and End User experience the Army is striving for.

This is a very complex situation and it would certainly benefit from a COTS solution.
End User Pipedream = We end up with something like Zoho.

Hello World

noreply@blogger.com (Josh H) — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:53:00 +0000

My name is Josh and I work in the field of Battle Command and Training.

I have started this blog to serve as a vehicle to share information and start discussions about this field of work. I figured out long ago that current and relevant info on current Defense IT and emergent capabilities is hard to come by, so I hope to do my part and cut through the "clear as mud" reality for End - Users.

Two info streams are available for your convenience: My Twitter and this blog's rss / atom feed.

Please feel free to contact me via Google Voice or the comments section for questions / feedback / advice.

Here goes nothing...