What Men Are Saying About Women.

Women out of control..

2012-01-28T14:46:00.000+11:00

One does have to wonder where this is all heading. we have the latest saga about a female prison psychologist faking a "I BEEN RAPED" scene in order to get her husband to move to another swankier suburb, yep a qualified, recognised, licensed professional, supposedly grown up female, resorts to acting like a child just to get her own way..

The court was told Martinez, 36, engaged the help of her friend, Nicole April Snyder, 33, to stage the bogus crime in April last year. Before dialling 911, she split her own lip, wet her pants, ripped her blouse, and had a friend punch her in the face. When police arrived, she was crying hysterically, and told officers she had found a stranger in the house who knocked her out, raped her and fled taking two laptops, an Xbox and her purse. But she was allegedly caught out when a colleague told police she had faked the entire event.

Martinez staged the entire ordeal, scraping her own knuckles with sandpaper and used a pin to cut her lip, court papers allege. She ripped open own her shirt to expose her breasts and wet herself to persuade police she had been knocked unconscious, according to the documents. Her friend allegedly used specially bought boxing gloves to bruise her friend's face.

And the Pussy Pass, the automatically assumed and expected reduced sentence that only women receive was --

Sacramento Superior Court Judge Kevin J. McCormick sentenced Laurie Ann Martinez to five years probation, six months of electronic monitoring and ordered her to pay $4,463.32 in restitution for the police investigation. On top of that comes the personal cost - her husband has divorced her, and she was fired from her job as a psychologist at California State Prison, Sacramento.

The only real justice in this case was that her husband had the sense to give this lunatic the flick..
Link..
Meanwhile..

Mother who staged phony kidnapping and later found with daughter at Disney World gets eight years in prison for stealing more than $1million

The suburban mom arrested at Disney World after calling in a hoax kidnapping of her daughter nearly three years ago was sentenced to 100 months in jail after she was convicted of stealing more than $1million from her boss and a relative.

'She's convulsing': Demi Moore 911 call reveals actress 'smoked something'... but drug details are edited out

A tape of a 911 call that was made from Demi Moore's home the night she was rushed to hospital has been released. In the recording, a panicked female caller can be heard saying: 'She smoked something. It's not marijuana, but it's similar to incense. She added that Demi was 'convulsing' and 'semi-conscious, barely.'

Poor Demi Moore facing a rather lonely existance after the split up which in my opinion always takes two to instigate and deliberately work on, in the majority of cases. Even her million dollar plastic refit did not postpone the inevitable. Toy boys will always win out in the end. The sooner those ludicrous, youth seeking, women realise that the better for their own sanity, health and wellbeing..

And what length won't they go to to achieve fame ?

'My boob implants swelled to the size of my head... then EXPLODED!'

Exploding is not just a little over the top, it's way over, as they just leaked. But that's another story..

Now someone has to pay because they stuck foreign material behind their mammary glands..
All fascinating and entertaining stuff. Just like in them girlie magazines..

The New Adulteress..

2012-01-28T10:15:00.002+11:00

Nope, No Vamp Here..

Desperation for copy apparently permits female journalists to make shit up. But let's assume that this is real and happening to someone you know..

Better sharpen the nails..

The New Adulteress

Women who cheat with married men are no longer getting a bad rap. Today's mistress isn't a vamp, she's not desperate, and she's not afraid to poach what's yours

The endless pursuit of market share by the women's mags carry no bounds when it comes to exposing the amoral attitudes of women. I am trying to think as to whom this actually benefits, why would they even expose this if not to tar all women with the same brush and ofcourse include the husbands as well..

vamp - informal
noun, a woman who uses sexual attraction to exploit men.
verb [ trans. ] blatantly set out to attract

The journalist must have a different dictionary to mine..
She claims that banging your friend's husband is not desperation and being a vamp is not even considered unreasonable. These are desperate times where the girls apparently, have no issues with poaching just for the sake of some company, any company, even if it means destroying a friends marriage, not a problem at all..

Enlightening issues to ponder and applying even more pressure on the female's wellbeing and body image is the order of the day with any of these magazines and they walk out the door as willing enthuisiasts inhale this inane drivel on a daily basis just to ensure they are totally uncomfortable with themselves, thereby raising their own angst-level in order to blame others for their "emotional" self loathing, mood swings, promoting the never ending "life sucks" mantra. They cannot feel good about themselves and need to be told why. Cannot just go without the latest "news" of course and did I mention the gossip, that's where you get to read how other women screwed up their lives just to make you feel better. and while we are at it have a look at the dress that even they are pushed to afford. So in actual fact the overall affect is quite neutral(misery-blame) which ofcourse makes them go back for more..

Having flicked thru a few on the odd occasion when there was nothing else on the table, not even a medical journal on lobotomies, it would appear to be the case that you could indeed pick up any example and the messages were all the same. It's almost like they have a ~~premenstrual~~ erm, a brainstorming session before any are printed just to ensure the projection of misery and angst is synchronised..

This one is actually called "Women's Health", where it should in reality be termed "Women's Misery and Angst" instead. Here are the latest headlines..

You too can heighten your misery level by purchasing just one copy. Anyway, where was I. Oh yes, the bonking someone's husband stuff.

Too boring..

Link..

The Heteronormative, Cisgendered, Sex Positive, Feminists..

2012-01-28T08:41:00.000+11:00

A group of Heteronormative, Cisgendered, Sex Positive, Feminists, I think..

One could be mistaken for thinking that any feminist enabler, follower or adherant, suffers increasingly from any number of registered psychological conditions, that could only be treated with "shock therapy"(only eco-positive, solar generated, real power, ofcourse) or maybe even a possible complete brain evacuation could overcome the condition they have self-generated in order to "express" themselves. They have had to invent new words, as the old language was apparently inadequate for "what needs to be erm, said"..

A severe level of cognitive dissonance would assist in delving into the subconscious in order to seek depth of expression until they realise that it's not what it is for. The two new generation thinkers below demonstrate how the "new feminists" think and behave in order to be "there and present", new invectives had to be invented, over-abusing the verb as standard, the predicate boosted with comments that leaves the normal and sane gaping in wonderment; a feminist's standard pursuit for the day..
It's akin to spending the morning trying to find the cookie jar, just to find it's empty. The end result of listening to their comments or conversation has that same disappointing end result..
It could well be the case that I am too ignorant about the new heightened level of the feminist savant, but I am probably thinking more along the lines of idiot savant, methinks..

Comments raised to explain this condition -

"You're obviously just intimidated by cutting-edge, intellectual minds"

and

"I'm a white, heteronormative, cisgendered, sex positive, privileged, "add you own sex."

That's it. My brain is starting to ache..

Global Warming Affects Women the Mostest..

2012-01-27T22:57:00.000+11:00

Just like the Global warming enthusiasts enjoy spreading fear and possible mayhem as they have been for the last 20 years, so have the feminists matched that same methodology. They appear to be working with tag team precision. Taking turns with who can frighten people the most, feminists with their "All Women are VICTIMS" hype or the AGW Global warming hoaxers with the "You will die in your bed real soon by fire and brimstone, oops wrong religion, by being barbequed or like a drowned rat in 100 meter tall waves" rants, that will ofcourse never eventuate, not this lifetime anyway. We'll all die of nagging and boredom first..

So here are a few comparisons from the "BBQ and Drowning" crowd, first off the block. It compares the "Computer Predictions and Models" with the real events over the years, that we have actually seen daily and were recorded without fibbing..

I borrowed those charts from here

The bad news is that they have been telling fibs and exaggerating just a little, actually they been fibbing a huge amount and its made them a lot of money..

Now for the Feminists not to loose out on the hysteria level, they thought they would jump onto the bandwagon by raising this bit of exaggerated fluff and also treat females like animals, trusts them up in plastic and displayed like a popular meat product, just for effect..

Now how degrading is this and why are they using white females when they are obviously referring to other countries where the skin colour is different. Is this feminist racism at it's best ?

Should they not be more concerned about denigrating and using women as sex object and images. Should they not have poked holes in the plastic so they can breathe, what are these people thinking ?

Most of women development effects from climate change can result from: increased temperatures, severe weather, rise of sea level and droughts. Three main issues of climate change that can be linked to the sex trade are: Water: As climate change causes droughts, it would be more difficult to attain water. As women are forced to travel greater distances to find and capture potable water they are at a higher risk of kidnapping and con-artists who are linked to the sex trade industry. Agriculture: Climate change causes severe weather patterns that could make temperature rise and fall more drastically making seasons shift. As these seasons shift crops will be affected the most. It would be difficult for people to grow food. To offset the decrease in crop output women would be forced to look for better paying jobs to pay for food they otherwise might be able to grow themselves. The need for higher economic stimulation would make these jobs offered by sex trade con artists seem more valuable than they might have before. Trees: Climate change and the resulting droughts would put a strain on the forests that supply the paper industry in Cambodia with their trees. As paper mill production drops workers may lose their jobs and would in turn be forced to look elsewhere for employment.

Chivalry Destroyed but Still Taken for Granted..

2012-01-27T09:14:00.002+11:00

It has been my personal experience that women do take that sign of chivalry for granted. There have been two examples over the past few years that came to mind as I read this article from the The Spearhead..

Example one came up when I was in a accessories store looking for a book stand of some type and came across a narrow pathway in the over stocked store, there was room for only one person to go through at a time. At the same time two women approached, one quite elderly and one who must have been her granddaughter. I strolled through without even stopping and even though it left them room to not impede their progress. It did not stop granny from making the obvious snide remark of "You're obviously not a gentleman", I stopped turned around and commented that if she expected chivalry, it is too late as you have killed that..

The response was worth a thousand words but I did not have a camera with me. So the "take that for granted" attitude is widely dispersed among women as they feel within themselves that they are worth more and they should be automatically given abeyance regardless of the situation. I use to in the past, but now I no longer bother as it is indeed taken for granted. My door opening days for women is over, as they have killed that as well and I only demonstrate manners to those I know, like family and friends, the rest can open their own damn door. As for carrying weights, same thing. I have seen a few struggle and obviously totally pissed as there look, their desperate, hopeful stare, attested, I smile..

The next example came when I passed a car parked on the side of a busy access road at peak hour and noticed a women standing in front of the car, just staring at it, wondering I suppose, what to do next. As I passed I saw her edge to the side of the road and wave for help to passing motorists..
The following day there was a letter to the editor "Letter of the day" which stated that it was her who was stranded on the side of the road and she bitterly complained that no one stopped and had to call the road service club to help. She failed to state ofcourse that there would have been women who passed her as well but blamed the men for their thoughtless behaviour. I was quite surprised when the next day there was a response which stated "You wanted equality, you got it", kinda made my day..

The gift transformed into a debt.
from The Spearhead by Dalrock

Blessed is he who expects no gratitude, for he shall not be disappointed.

– W.C. Bennett

Back in 1852 the troop ship HMS Birkenhead sank in shark infested waters off the coast of South Africa. There weren’t enough lifeboats to save everyone, and the captain made the extraordinary decision to reserve them for the women and children aboard. The crew followed the captain’s order even though it meant his and many of their own deaths. This incredible example of men sacrificing for others has made what otherwise would have been an obscure shipwreck a famous event in history.

Even a century and a half later, women still understand the meaning of the profound sacrifice made by those brave men:

Men owe us.

A similar event occurred in 1912 when RMS Titanic struck an iceberg. Well over a thousand men stood aside and died so that mostly women (and a lesser percentage of children) could survive. Women understood the meaning of that sacrifice as well:

You got off easy. The women who survived are the ones who had to suffer. We didn’t ask you to do this for us anyway.

And of course: Men owe us.

One of the videos I saw after the sinking of the Costa Concordia had an overweight American woman with a short haircut complaining:

It certainly wasn’t women and children first!

She said this in the form of an indictment, with the obvious expectation that all listening would see it as proof of an outrageous dereliction by the men on the ship. She and countless other women believe that since some men have volunteered to die in shipwrecks in the past, all men will forever have an obligation to do so. What men in the past did was an incredible act of graciousness; it has been met with an equally incredible lack of grace in return.

I’ve searched the web looking for a copy of the video to share, but unfortunately I couldn’t find it. What I found instead was even more powerful however. Sheila Gregoire wrote a post/syndicated column shortly after the Costa Concordia went down titled: Women and Children First? A Feminist Tragedy (emphasis mine):

In the comments I’ve been reading on the news reports, people seem to agree that children should be given priority, but there’s a heated debate about the women. We’re equal, so why should a man lose a place to a woman? Why should a man have to help a woman when he’s in danger, too?

And, as disgusting as I find that question, it makes sense. In 1912 it was a different world. Personal responsibility was still the main ethos of the day. People took care of their neighbours; they did not wait for government to do it for them. And people had a code of honour that included helping others when you could.

Somehow we have lost that. It is no longer about honour and what we should do for others; it has become what others should do for us.

I assume the irony is lost on her that her response to men having shown incredible selflessness is to be upset that men might at times elect to take care of themselves instead of focusing on people like her. As I have written before, making chivalry mandatory or expected destroys the very concept. It isn’t just feminists who destroyed chivalry, but feminist-lite women who view themselves as traditional.

Even so it wasn’t Sheila’s blog post which really startled me, it was the comments from many of the women who read her blog. Several of the women understood the issue and why men made different choices on that wreck than on certain shipwrecks in the past. But others took an attitude of incredible entitlement, assuming that men in general exist to serve them. Commenter Rachel started by explaining that men owe this to women because women’s lives are worth more than men’s:

Women and children do not go first because they are weaker; they go first because lets face it, you need more women than men to keep the population going (men can make millions of babies in a day, women can only make 1-2 per year at best and our fertility is limited)and children are our future to continue the human race.

She then describes how she rudely bumped into a man recently in an elevator because she assumed he would understand that she has a special right to exit elevators first, even though of course she is his equal:

That being said, I was just thinking of this topic last night. I was sharing an elevator with a man about my age. When the elevator stopped, I automatically started to get off and he almost ran into me! I am so used to men letting me get off the elevator first, it hadn’t occurred to me that he wouldn’t. Once I righted myself, I got thinking about it and why would he let me off first? I am his equal. I started to think if there was a scientific reason, and I could not come up with one. In fact, I thought maybe the man should go first to let him see if it’s safe (I’ve watched too much late night drama and seen too many people get attacked getting off elevators).

Even though the uppity man in the elevator didn’t know his place, she graciously suggests that there are times when it is acceptable for a man to enter a lifeboat:

The thought process led to thinking about the “women and children first” policy and I do still think that applies, unless the child who is getting on the life boat is only accompanied by his/her father. I think then the dad should be able to get on the life boat with his child(ren).

I want to back up and remind you that before 1852 there was no such expectation that men should stand by and drown in order to save women who in most cases are strangers. The sense of entitlement so many women now have because of acts of incredible selflessness by men in the past is astonishing.

Another commenter named Britiney who writes a blog called Consider the Lillies read Sheila’s post and it reminded her of a time recently when men she didn’t know failed to snap-to and be her personal unpaid valet. It happened when she exercised poor planning while taking her computer in for repair:

Along the same lines and under the heading of “Chivalry is dead” I had to take my computer to the repair shop last week. I took it to the Apple store in our local mall and, not knowing that there was a “secret” entrance close to the store, I lugged it all the way through the parking lot, and then all the way through the mall and then BACK because I decided to take it somewhere else. I don’t know how much it weighs, but by the time I got all the way back to my car I was nearly in tears because it was SO heavy and I was SO frustrated. And here’s my point: I cannot even tell you how many able-bodied young men I passed while I was carrying something that was OBVIOUSLY too heavy for me. When I finally got to my car I called my husband and told him that my boys will NEVER pass someone who needs help and not offer to help them. I was so disgusted that not one single man offered to help me! So so so sad. I can’t influence any of the men who passed me by, but I can certainly influence the 3 young men God has entrusted to my care and if I have ANYTHING to do with it, they WILL put women and children first!!!

It reminded me of a comment Hestia made on a previous post on this topic about a woman who saw a group of servicemen returning from active duty, and was upset that they didn’t volunteer to carry her load for her:

Basically here is a group of largely men who have been sacrificing on behalf of the nation (or so the story goes) who haven’t done enough for this pampered princess. So it seems to go not only with soldiers in particular but men in general when it comes to chivalry.

One thing men need to understand is that in the event that they make the kind of sacrifice women are demanding, not only will it lead to even more entitlement, but many women will still detract from the noble nature of your choice. Commenter Amanda wrote:

Not to undermine your point, but when the Titanic sank, women and children were NOT put first. Sure, they started the evacuations like that, and there were men of honor, but there were also the men who locked the doors to the third class section so that those people wouldn’t take up lifeboat space, and the coward who pushed women and children aside in their haste to get into a boat.

After Sheila challenged her on the historical accuracy of this claim, Amanda replied with:

Well, it’s been a few years since I did all the reading I did on the Titanic, but I was pretty interested as a youngling, and the picture I got from the books was one of polite, subversive cowardice slowly escalating to outright anarchy and panic.

Understand that if you sacrifice yourself for women you don’t know that most women will simply take your act of ultimate selflessness as proof that men owe them. A significant number will also deny the bravery of your dying act.

Note: This post first appeared on my blog.

The Spearhead is a reader-supported site, so if you enjoy our content please consider a donation to keep us online now and in the future. Thank you, your support is appreciated.

Link to the Spearhead..

Bess Hungerford as Undercover Punk: Removing Man and Boy..

2012-01-26T17:03:00.000+11:00

The Daughters of Feminists wondering why they should be different, you know, shave legs and stuff..

Just to increase your education just a little more regarding those radical feminists. Have a look at this rather comical set of events that every female can look forward to, with their compliments ofcourse. It has always been the rad fem's dream to remove either every single male from the planet or just keep a few drones around for mating purposes, probably those ball-less male feminist wimps who would offer no resistance..

Undercover Punk aka Bess Hungerford - I have reservations about framing “revolution” as the natural or inevitable conclusion of radical feminist theorizing. It seems generally accepted that “revolution” will cause the total destruction of all existing social institutions because revolution is only means of eliminating the “root” of female oppression. Thoughts which support revolution are therefore “radical;” everything short of that is not-radical. Not-radical thinking has no place in “radical” feminism. I’ve been turning these assumptions over and over in my mind. The belief that female liberation through “revolution” is even possible leaves many unanswered questions for me.

For example, how do feminists propose that we destroy all social institutions? With physical force? I think violence is counter-productive to feminism, but let’s pretend that women can use violence as a means to a greater end without harming ourselves in the process. I will suspend disbelief and take as given that women have also been successful in destroying all the buildings and physical infrastructure men have ever built; that we have effectively destroyed all the historical records and organizational documents of patriarchy (and that no one is secretly harboring any of them).

Now bear in mind that we are looking at RadFem's version of being polite as this blog is indeed in public view, which indicates how they believe that the public is ready to be exposed to their lunatic rantings and behaviour..

The lunatic feminist by the name of Undecover Punk(blog link) is no other than Bess Hungerford, another member of that sadistic movement and member of the Radfem Hub forum..

Hungerford also has a Facebook page which shows all of the other revolutionaries who are all apparently ready to die for the cause as those radicals are poking and prodding the methods of eliminating half the earth's population, which will ofcourse take some major effort and I will leave you to ponder those missteps in their stupidity, to contemplate. A more lunatic bunch one would be hard to find. Matching even the KKK, but making it sound nice, just like being handed a mushroom and wondering whether you would survive eating it...

According to Agent Orange, here is it's facebook page..

So we have Undercover Punk exposed as Bess Hungerford and exposed with the level and type of psychopathic ramblings it promotes. What warms me up the most is the responses to this lunatic's ramblings, you know, like, like she actually has this really good idea and I am going to like help and stuff..

More Hungerford - So, how would women eliminate these residual subconscious biases? This is my primary reservation about revolution as liberation: human minds cannot be wiped clean of patriarchal ideas. Freeing women from the tangible constraints of patriarchal institutions is a noble cause, but revolutionary results will require us to transform ideology as well.

That appear to be the major problem where Hugerford is concerned. What they would really need would be one of those mind erasing gadgets, you know those, the one that girls keep discovering all the time. And here I am fixing their problems, again..

Sargasso Sea - How would we solve problems and distribute resources? I simply don’t have faith in human (read: female) “nature” to magically work-it-out.

Freeing women from the tangible constraints of patriarchal institutions is a noble cause, but revolutionary results will require us to transform ideology as well.

This is indeed getting trickier all the time. After murdering every man and boy on the planet, with the exemption of Hugo, Manboobs and Flood (been given their little room and a test tube), they would have to have a close look at each other apparently, as there may be some residual "patriarchal" thinkers among them and they might gum up the path to invoked Utopia, which is even further down the road than initially anticipated, like the next county..

I have another suggestion though, how about George Orwell's 1984, it could well supply the answer. They, the Matriarchy, could connect every, erm, erm, cave (with nice curtains) to the erm, erm, citizen broadband radio system as soon as someone reinvents it and have those propaganda sessions just like in the book..

Likewise and that’s why I like the idea of “Resolution”; it’s resolved, for instance, that a “revolution” would end with a whole lot of revolutionaries who still see through patriarchy-warped lenses.

It’s a resolution of each and every woman’s moral intellect we’re really after, I think. Then things could be really, really different. Maybe. I hope.

Ooh, Ooh, oh, I know, pick me, How about they just wipe out all those females who they think may or could possibly be or may some time in the future, think about that other "archy" and just take them outside and just shoot them as well. It should be easy as they have just wiped out them other Patriarchy members without blinking..

Easy peasy, problem solved..

....Will you stop helping them,.....idiot!!..

Melinda Tankard Reist : Friend or Foe..

2012-01-26T15:13:00.000+11:00

Radical feminists are the driving force behind the feminist movement. Those radicals as can be seen here, are the integral part of the promotion of that hate movement's activities against males, as they promote female superiority and supremacy, steer it's course. If there are still people in doubt, have a look at the link above and that will demonstrate precisely where those male loathers are at and are all about..

The "pretend" feminists of all colour, shapes and sizes, live in complete ignorance and denial about these radicals, their function in that hate movement. Those same "rosy" feminists still choose to claim that feminism is about equality without realising how rediculous they are spouting that dream. The Radical Feminists put the "nazy" into feminazy, giving it relevance and meaning..

Radical feminists demonstrate clearly why they are not even remotely interested in equality. If one has a look at any book or article produced by these radicals, you will never see any mention or resolvability or acceptability or even one single specific effort for equality, this is ofcourse not their intention, aim, goal or outcome. They demand and strive for supremacy at any cost and any price, as they know they are the not the one who is going to pay the price..

Below is a small list of these radicals at work in Australia at the moment, trying to introduce and have already in cases, manipulated legislation to ensure that women only benefit from any new laws introduced. This is how they work. They produce their own statistics, introduce false information via biased studies and peddle them off to politicians as real evidence. They ensure that if any politician, either male or female, does not toe their sickening timeframe and refuses to ensure their biased male hating legislation is passed, will be labeled as a women hater and or a misogynists, often both. That is the tactic they have used for years and it has worked well. The inject fear into anyone who dares go against their feminists zietgeist, in order to achieve their undeclared outcomes..

Another detailed list of the National Plan’s sources can be found here.

The Greater circle of Australian Radical Feminists
One little known portion of the website Radfemspeak.net, which is the site that hosts the Radfem forums, is a series of pages that they call ‘The Fury’.[10] The amount of information that is on The Fury is not large, but what is on there is very telling about Australian radical feminism and how the site’s members are connected outside of their small circle. On one of the pages, there is a list of names and short biographies, which the site considers to be radical feminists of note inside Australia. There list includes,Diane Bell, Susan Hawthorne, Sheila Jeffreys, Renate Klein, Jocelynne A. Scutt, Mary Lucille Sullivan, Denise Thompson, Bronwyn Winter and Betty McLellan.[11]

[10] http://radfemspeak.net/the-fury/
[11] http://radfemspeak.net/the-fury/aust-radfems.html

Two names come specifically to mind and that is Renate Klein and Susan Hawthorne. Two radical feminists who have already declared their membership to the inner chamber, the inner of the hte chamber, a sanctum where all that hate generation, blossoms..

Here is an article by those two frauds..

Tankard Reist: Sugar would not even melt in her mouth..

The authentic feminism of Melinda Tankard Reist
Link..

As her publishers at Spinifex Press, Australia's only feminist publishing house (and secular), we take issue with these portrayals of Melinda Tankard Reist. It is easy to try to dismiss someone by smacking on a "fundamentalist" (whether Christian or Muslim, Hindu or Jewish) label and thereby dismiss the arguments that a person makes. What is less easy, but more ethical and intellectually rigorous, is to examine Tankard Reist's views - which are shared by many feminists and other advocates for social justice and human rights - and to see what the factual arguments for those views are.

Tankard-Reist, I am told is something else besides being one of them (being a conservative religious fundamentalist). That her principals and writing cannot be aligned with that hate movement's aims and goals. But you are judged by the company you keep and from the look of it, she has wallowed into the atrophying behaviour and thinking processes that those radicals find reason to comment about. Claiming that she is one of them and her efforts are in tone with their own thinking. I for one am not convinced that she is a blameless individual or an innocent bystander as she edits books for that feminist ( Even a cursory examination of her writings and the books she has edited for Spinifex Press) press as well as producing books on emotive topics and articles to ensure that she gets exposure and recognition. She has also chosen to take the same path as radicals by ensuring that her input is regarded and seen to push their male hating agenda, producing emotive information about the porn industries and prostitution, both of which will guarantee access to government subsidy and largesse. Radical feminists have used both those issues to germinate the male hating legislation that is now on the legislation books and designed solely benefit women only at the cost of men's basic human rights..

Never have any of these radicals ever considered any other point of view other than their own slanted, doctored purview, never would they ever have considered that a male prostitute or porn actor could be there due to coercion or force just like females may be (in most cases they have been demonstrated that they are not, but in it for the money or confess that 25% porn users are women) but that would never be considered..

Feminists were never about equality..

Tankard Reist could be a devils advocate but I am not going to go through her ponderings, her books and articles to find out and will leave it to others who already have. But her input has found it's way into the feminists hegemony database of malice and misinformation, for future use. You can if you like go to the radfemhub blog(link to download,top r/h corner) and load your mind with the vitriol and malice those radical feminists have produced and etch their poison into your mind for the rest of your life and wonder how easy women can take the low road and be influenced by something that is so distorted and incomprehensible as allow it to contaminate their action and words to such a degree.It will find them being loathsome and devoid of any humanity at all. That effort will change your own attitude towards the opposite sex, forever. Believe me, it is not worth the effort to be that sickened to the stomach by their verbal and mordant behaviour. Best to not want to know(in reference to the 250Mb Agent Orange download material on the RADFEM Hub R/H sidebar)..
But in the end, Tankard Reist has thrown her lot in with them and that is where she is and will stay unless convinced otherwise..

Women Feel More Pain. Really ?

2012-01-26T12:44:00.000+11:00

In order to get women into the Army, feminists decided to make claims about the "superiority" of women by claiming they feel less pain and are also able to withstand the heat better then men. Needless to say, the sycophants in the armed services complied, spreading those lies and therefore making way for women to join the army en masse.

They did have to change the application standards ofcourse as well as the exercise regimen as well as start up a "Baby Sitting Service", just to accommodate all those saintly females, those unstoppable killing machines. But that's besides the point ofcourse..

We had those lies printed in the "Newspaper of Record", the feminist controlled New York Times, to encourage females to die just like them men do, that was another farce ofcourse..

In a review of the records of veterans of the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan, researchers at the Yale University School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System found that women were less likely than men to report any pain, 38.1 percent to 44 percent.

Several factors there were ignored in this study, but it was grist for the feminist mill in a push to have more body bags containing female parts and remains, than were showing up at the moment, it was the principle ofcourse. They also made that claim about the female soldier being far more efficient, periods and all..

Now we have those same lies countered and one would have to die of old age for any feminist to retract or even apologise for those lies but in order to do that, one would have to have some level of integrity or even a conscience. Both are devoid in feminists..

Now we have the precise opposite, actually we have the truth and another feminist lie exposed..

Study: Women feel pain more intensely than men.

Women experience pain more intensely than men, according to a U.S. study.

The study, reported in the Journal of Pain, reports that women seeking medical care for a wide range of medical problems in the hospital or clinics at Stanford University School of Medicine reported higher pain intensity, on average, compared with men with the same diagnoses.

Women reported more intense pain in 14 of 47 disease categories, while men did not report more intense pain in any category, ABC News reported.

We all know where this is going. Now we will have the endless demands that women's pain has been ignored, more money will now have to be allocated to study that and women will now have to be specifically assessed and a special drug will have to be invented so the poor dears will not suffer so much even though at the moment, they are the bigger medical drug users already. They are victims didn't you know..

From my personal experience over the years, they complain endlessly about anything remotely "painful", which would include a vast range of psychosomatic as well as "real" pain, they are human. I have seen them complain endlessly about a splinter in the finger. I mean, who actually really believed they could stand more pain to begin with. I do wish they would make up their minds as I am getting dizzy by this never ending claim of women being "superior" in every department then Men and over the years, each and every claim made by lying feminist have been relegated to the scrapheap. Amazing..

CDC: Women were more likely to use prescription drugs than men.

Now tell me how these lies that feminists have intendedly formulated, help women again?. We have radical feminists (mostly lesbians and the biggest bunch of violent abusers cannot be found) who go to extremes to claim how superior women are. They build them up just to tear them down, so who does that actually help. Certainly not the members of the opposite sex. Young female college students are endlessly dragged into those lies via "Women's/Gender Studies indoctrination classes che", just to find out later, if they feel like checking that out, only to discover they have been conned. Each sex has their own benefits and abilities and it has yet to be rationally proven that one is better than the other but radical feminists keep claiming it has been the case. Who knows where they get those lies from..

Feminist lies will inevitably cause more misery and suffering and for no benefit except keeping themselves in highly paid positions, so they can keep dishing out this level of tripe..

Women will pay in the end and it's already happening in more ways than one. It's about time they decided who their enemy really is..

Female Teachers and Plastic Sugery, it's for the Students..

2012-01-26T10:12:00.000+11:00

This is past laughable, if it was not so farcical. Apparently female teachers, you know the ones who ignore the education of boys in favour of girls and as previously reported, Teaching without standing in front of a classroom or having anything to do with students, that one. Well it appears the perks have no limitation where female teachers are concerned..
Now they can have plastic surgery at the expense of the taxpayer. Important surgery, not what that original option was intended to be used for, nope, we have emergency procedures like liposuction, botox, facial enhancements, enhanced boobs, anything they like. They are women and they are worth it, just ask..

It probably would explain why they would indulge with such surgery, they would want to look nice for all those underage boys they are banging. Well, at least they are not being selfish about it..

Note also the heading and the explanation where they are too cowardly to name the sex who are the main culprits(then again the majority are females anyway). The heading should be "Female Teachers Indulge in Plastic Surgery in order to have sex with Underage Students", now that would be a headline, as well as stating the bleeding obvious for a change, instead of pussy-footing around the real reasons. Good thing I am not a newspaper editor as the headlines would change in an instant..

Buffalo teachers still get free plastic surgery courtesy of taxpayers
Link..

Public school teachers in Buffalo can get botox, liposuction, hair removal, and various other nips and tucks from plastic surgeons -- all completely free. And taxpayers are footing the bill.

The Atlantic reports the perk is part of a self-insured rider in its teachers' contracts. There's no co-pay, so the school district pays for the cosmetic surgery procedures completely.

Though the bill was less than $1 million in 2004, the annual cost is now estimated at $5.4 million and, in 2009, teachers enjoyed $9 million worth of plastic surgery. The Buffalo News says nine out of 10 procedures were skin treatments that year, and 10 out of 10 were elective.

Child Abuse Statistics for 2010..

2012-01-25T22:09:00.001+11:00

This has always been a topic that has been swept under the carpet for as long as I can remember. No Government Agency or NGOs are interested in anything that only demonstrates the facts and shows women to be the greater culprits. It's is just ignored or denied or just swept under the carpet and meanwhile all those agencies who claim to be there for the purpose of protecting children, just endorse and promote this farce via their refusal to promote it or even recognise that it happens..

Now, how many single mothers are there again ?

The commenter on this video is 100% correct when he states that no one is interested in exposing these numbers and you will not see them in today's media at all.. The denial, lies and hypocrisy is that glaringly obvious..

I had a Dad..

2012-01-25T13:17:00.000+11:00

I could say a lot about this but this time I won't, I will let the son explain what happened..

Gender Neutral Baby is a Boy: SURPRISED?

2012-01-25T12:37:00.001+11:00

It won't be long before they turn him from this......

I am of the same opinion as Bill in this regard, there was no way they were going to hide the sex of a girl. Those lunatics, cretins for parents, were always going to destroy a boy both mentally and physically with all those inane and unjustifiable "good" intentions. They do not deserve to have a son if this is the way he is being treated. It is child abuse in the most chilling and unforgivable, way..

I did predict it was a boy, so did probably everyone else. They would never do that to a princess as there was no specific or justifiable reason..

A bit like those two cretin parents refusing to divulge the sex of their (son) child. They would be finding out about now precisely what his sex preferences are unless ofcourse they force him to behave like a girl, which rather defeats their inane intentions of not identifying as either sex.

To this, along with appropriate slander..

Gender Neutral Baby Revealed: It’s a Boy
from The Spearhead by W.F. Price

A British couple that decided to raise their child in a ‘gender neutral’ environment has finally revealed that the kid is a boy. This doesn’t surprise me at all. Knowing these kinds of nuts, it makes perfect sense that they did it to their son, because they usually try to make a point at the expense of a boy, and raising girls like boys is already common throughout the Anglo world.

They had the boy cross-dress, and when he tried to run around naked in the yard (little kids love doing that), they hustled him back in to hide him from the neighbors and gave him dolls. His mother is making him wear the girls’ school uniform, and won’t let him wear combat trousers.

Not long ago, gender identity problems in children were considered a mental disorder. There’s a reason for that. It can cause serious mayhem when puberty hits. It’s unlikely that this kid will think of himself as ‘gender-neutral’ for much longer, but if he walked into the girls’ locker room in middle school and took off his clothes, we all know what would happen to him. So does his mother, and I’m sure she supports boys being punished for such behavior.

This is why she doesn’t really believe in this garbage; she’s just using the boy to bolster her progressive cred. Pure selfishness at her son’s expense.

The Spearhead is a reader-supported site, so if you enjoy our content please consider a donation to keep us online now and in the future. Thank you, your support is appreciated.

WIKIPEDIA and Negationism:Distorting the Facts..

2012-01-25T11:21:00.000+11:00

Wikipedia has a massive following and it lists on Google in the top ten "96.6% of Wikipedia Pages Rank in Google’s Top 10". Google favours Wikipedia in all of it's searches. It automatically includes Wikipedia regardless of the topic searches. However, it has already been demonstrated that Wikipedia does not and is not the epicenter of indisputable facts, actual historic substantiated factual information..

The entire site is run by volunteers, they can decide among themselves what to expose, what to write and how to go about it. It has also been clearly demonstrated that Wikipedia is trying to rewrite history according to some ideological leanings. This ofcourse leads to bias and misinformation as the facts are twisted to suit some imaginary interpretation, rather then explaining precisely the way it actually happened or what was originally recorded. In their interpretation, they twist the facts anyway they please and allow others to do the same..

Here is one individual who has already confessed to changing the "facts" on Wikipedia using another name and introducing his own bias and interpretations..

Johann Hari has admitted to altering quotes from interviewees, in a "personal apology" posted on the Independent website.

The columnist has also confessed to editing his own Wikipedia entry -- as well as those of others with whom he had disagreements, in "ways that were juvenile or malicious". The admission follows an investigation into his conduct by ex-Independent editor Andreas Whittam Smith.

So it is possible for anyone to enlist at Wikipedia as a volunteer and just change any information you "feel" is not correct. Anyone can change or alter facts to suit their own political leanings and it will be displayed as such. This is a grave matter of concern as every school in the western world uses Wikipedia for fact finding and Google encourages that by ensuring that Wikipedia is listed on every search. That action must question the integrity of Wikipedia as well as Google. Whether they are both in bed together promoting the same ideological outcomes or interested in doing the precise opposite and present the facts as they stand..

From Wikipedia..

Volunteering is generally considered an altruistic activity, intended to promote good or improve human quality of life, but people also volunteer for their own skill development, to meet others, to make contacts for possible employment, to have fun, and a variety of other reasons that could be considered self-serving. Volunteerism is the act of selflessly giving your life to something you believe free of pay. Although if a person volunteers they may not earn money, it produces a feeling of self-worth and volunteers earn respect and Favors instead of money.

Even their descriptions on Volunteering leaves a lot to be desired. It is ofcourse an exaggeration that Wikipedia is serviced by honourable scholars or recognised historians as even they are corrupting the historical record..

Historical revisionism is either the legitimate scholastic re-examination of existing knowledge about a historical event, or the illegitimate distortion of the historical record such that certain events appear in a more or less favourable light. For the former, i.e. the academic pursuit, see historical revisionism.[1] This article deals solely with the latter, the distortion of history, which—if it constitutes the denial of historical crimes—is also sometimes (but not commonly) called negationism.[2][3]

So as far as Wikipedia is concerned, the current representations of historical fact has, been distorted, it's revision and therefore the copious historical information out there, needs to be re-adjusted to their way of thinking. They refer to it as "Negationism" which in it self already indicates that whoever comes up with the appropriate interpretation will have that information lodged and thereby used by everyone who uses Wikipedia including school children. Their interpretation of information will be warped to such a degree that real factual evidence will only be Wikipedia's interpretation of the past, not the actual facts..

It is a complete farce as it is one that carries a distinct politically biased outcome as well as promoting a specific doctrinal point of view..

Political Influence information, History provides insight into past political trends and helps predict political implications of the present. Revisionism can be used to cultivate specific politically motivated myths – sometimes with official consent.[14] Self-taught, amateur, or dissident academic historians manipulate and/or misrepresent historical accounts to achieve deliberate political ends.

No one would argue that facts can be and are distorted to suit someones political leanings but here is Wikipedia claiming to "Undistort" that information that they "feel" has been erroneously or intentionally slanted. Who would be the best judge of that I wonder. Their manipulations of the truth appears to be more of an act of political bastardy then demonstrating or claiming the higher road..

The actions of Wikipedia has distinct Orwellian overtones. George Orwell's Book "1984" demonstrates precisely how changes in historical facts can change future outcomes as well as ensuring current regimes are kept in power. Historical facts are there for us to learn from one's mistakes and to hopefully not make the same mistakes again. If history is distorted to follow some doctrine than how can anyone learn from a distorted view of history. It certainly does smack of the lessons ignored in Orwell 1984 book, as we head down the same path but only this time we can witness that happening while we sit on our hands and do nothing about it..

Here are some facts from RationalWiki concerning the distortions in Wikipedia.

.Wikia - Reality Warping which includes a list of "editors" on Wikipedia..

Even scientists are distorting their entries to their introduce their doctrinal leanings..

Conservepedia covers the distortions in Wikipedia..

The Distortions in today's Media..

On the face of it, it may well be regarded as a noble effort to introduce different aspects of history. Some facts have been distorted and no one would deny that of being the case, that is part of the record of history as well, but Wikipedia is doing precisely what they claim to have happened in the past. They claim that history was distorted and they will be the one to correct that information. But as we can see, their efforts and reasons for changing the record is not really what they are all about, not what they claim. They are in fact encouraging history to be totally rewritten in their own version and one that I am afraid will distort it even further than it may be already..

Someoen should have a good look at the entry for the Men's Movement on Wikipedia..

Plus correct the obvious female orientated MRA entry..

A Different Perspective from UncyclopediA..

2012-01-24T22:56:00.000+11:00

UPDATE..

Oops, forgot the commentary.. This is an imitation of Wikipedia and a different version of events according to some, who apparently have a sense of humour. They must be of the same opinion as I about Wikipedia which has become a laughable joke as way too many people have already confessed to changing information according to their doctrinal leanings, instead of telling and entering the truth or facts..

The AGW hysteric Hansen and Johann Hari -

The columnist has also confessed to editing his own Wikipedia entry -- as well as those of others with whom he had disagreements, in "ways that were juvenile or malicious". The admission follows an investigation into his conduct by ex-Independent editor Andreas Whittam Smith.

Wikipedia may just as well be a comedy just like this site is..

UncyclopediA

Feminism is a movement aimed at the promotion of parity between the sexes in political, economic and social rights, with particular emphasis of improving the position of women. Feminists believe that Women are equal to Men. They believe that by believing in such equality they prove themselves to be superior.

Allied to this cause is the notion that women are superhuman beings with god-like wisdom, and yet at the same time fragile little girls. In compensation for years of subjugation, women should, and must, have absolute power over men, and until they do, every woman is so oppressed that she cannot possibly be held responsible for anything she does.

The early campaigners for the vote: The Lollagettes

In the early 1900s when feminists campaigned for the vote (lollage), much violence occurred. Certain feminists were simply not aroused enough by the 'peaceful' regime which involved the frequent molestation of the most senior prime ministers! They broke away from the NUWSS (Naked udderless women seeking sexuality) and became the WSPU (Whale sex pornography unlimited). Demanding their right to vote (suffrage) but for women known as lollage, they were names the Lollagettes.

Even though women received the vote after publicly memorizing the first five letters of the alphabet in 1993, to this day a number of blonde lollagettes still campaign...

Menstruation

Captain Carly, better known as Leslie, is a strong supporter of the feminist movement since he became one in 1819, he was the first boy to become a girl and turn into a feminist.

Serious objections have been raised to this name, because of its male based first syllable. New suggestions are womenstruation, girlstruation, lesbstruation, bleedingbitchstruation and wecontrolallmendoasyouaretoldstruation, "Frustration" also works and it has the best description already for it. When it was pointed out that the root of the word was not actually men but menstrus - which is Latin for "month," the feminists killed 17 men in retaliation for pointing out one of the many flaws in their logic. It has since become taboo to point out any flaws in a feminist's logic.

Feminist Theology
“All men are rapists and that's all they are.”
~ Marilyn French

Feminists have, like jews, 10 commandments in which all feminists must swear are true before becoming an accepted believer.
Men do not have 10 times as much testosterone as women.
Men are socially constructed.
Men are assholes.
Witchcraft is safer and more reliable than math and science.
Lesbianism can conjure up babies (but only females).
Women having total power is equal (superior).
Males are a different species from females.
Dicks are evil.
False rape/stalking/gay allegations are a mighty sword feminist are proud to wield.
Women are super-human.

These Ten Commandments were revealed to ancient feminists by the (obviously) female prophet "Joses", "which is where men who killed Joses got their name for Jesus and Moses, both hopeless rapists".

Feminists also claim that heaven was on Earth and the world was completely sexless and peaceful after God banished Adam to his room for tricking Eve into masturbating with an apple. However, Adam was soon let out and joined with the devil, causing destruction and sexual desires all across the world. The only way to repent, feminists say, is to "give your wife the male position" and let her rape your ass till' the Earth will nova in 2012.
“When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression...”
~ Sheila Jeffrys

Herstory

Feminists believe that men have dominated history, and women have been ignored, with few exceptions. Their response is to reclaim history as herstory and show the world the importance of women. Again - do not try to point out the flawed logic of this idea, as 'history' is in fact derived from the Greek/Latin historias meaning knowledge or learning - nothing whatsoever to do with men.

The first person on the moon is now Nellie Armstrong, and the most famous leader of Rome is now Julie Caesar. Gloria Steinem and Rosie O'Donnell are now to be thought of as male.

Mainstream herstorians widely regard "history" as "utter bullcrap," as women have yet to prove themselves capable of anything outside of their traditional roles of "baking and baby-making," and it is unlikely that any such event has ever occurred. It is worth pointing out due to female failure in their two traditional pursuits, they are about as "valuable to society as a bicycle to a fish."

Origin

Modern Feminism was originally put forward as a joke in ancient Greek times by Ironicles, a philosopher and close friend of Aristotle, and after whom we have the English word irony, a joke nobody understands. Ironicles presented the idea as a satirical view of a society out of control, stating "where the women feel beauty is wrong, where the horses ride women, and who the hell invited the reindeer?" (See: Soviet Russia). The confusion over the last point was recently cleared up when evidence was found of an audience member (most likely Popsicles) proclaiming "get the stupid sod off, she's been on the wine again....tosspot." It is rumored that 115 years later, the great Testicles was castrated by a rabid feminist, released into the Colosseum too early. Apparently, Greek culture had a great influence on Saxons as well.

Why are Feminists So Threatened by MRA's..

2012-01-24T16:56:00.000+11:00

One does have to wonder why we have those endless attacks by the feminasties against MRA(Men's Rights Activists) or in my case a "Male Renaissance Agitator" ( a phrase coined by Fidelbogen ).

Renaissance - Origin: 1830–40; < French, Middle French: rebirth, equivalent to renaiss- (stem of renaistre to be born again < Latin renāscī; re- re- + nāscī to be born) + -ance -ance

Appropriate, as MRA's existed in the early 19th Century for the same reason we exist today. That being, that we refuse to be trodden underfoot, discarded as cannon fodder and relegated to third class citizenry. The ongoing attacks by "Male" feminists like Futrelle et al, really is something to behold. Let me show you why..

Futrelle - When I started my blog Man Boobz around six months ago, I intended to mostly discuss the issues motivating those in the Men’s Rights Movement, and to highlight some of the sillier misogynist emanations from men’s rights activists (MRAs). But the more I delved into the movement online, the more convinced I became that, for most of those involved in it, the movement isn’t really about the issues at all.

" the movement isn’t really about the issues at all." That statement, made me think of something written in the past, I have grave doubts that it was intentional, as that would require some knowledge of history and those malcontents are already too busy trying to rewrite it. The line that came to mind was a reference to Bill Shakespeare's "Much ado about nothing"..

I wonder why they feel so threatened by MRA's ?

The "..movement isn't really about about much at all" contradicts the author as Futreelle spends most of his time, just like Hugo, writing about issues that in their opinion, is really about nothing. One does have to wonder if he can actually detect any irony in his own comments, one also wonders if he is capable. I know the girls have a similar problem understanding irony, so one has to wonder if there have been changes underfoot or under boob!

For number two, includes an obvious lie, we have this remark -

"I intended to mostly discuss the issues motivating those in the Men’s Rights Movement"

That statement is as far from the truth as anything can be. Futtrele's ulterior motive has always been solely motivated by his hate of any resistance to the feminist hegemony. He continually produces any remarks or comments made by any individual, that he perceives to be a member or claims to be or assumes to be and selects the most offensive comment he can find (by scanning/monitoring selected forums, blogs and sites), even though the individual, making the comment may not even be a member or remotely regarded as such or could even been a deliberate plant, an impostor/troll in order to produce grist for his slander mill, creating new headlines he elevates as being representative or being the general attitude of the MM and/or MRAs. I and many others have witnessed these trolls on quite a few occasions. I definitely would not put it past these opponents to introduce someone in order to play or enhance the vitriol they constantly spew at the slightest excuse.

This is precisely what this recalcitrants indulges in, locating tripe and trivia, blowing it out of proportion and exposing it as the latest "News" release and introducing imaginary issue..

This is normal behavior for any feminist, I expected this dishonesty and highly questionable behavior. I have come to expect nothing less. In order for anyone to become a feminist, one must shred their integrity, abdicate their honesty and throw their dignity out the door. It appears to be standard operating procedure, you cannot be a feminist and have a conscience at the same time..

Their mantra should contain "Eat, Drink, Cheat and Lie", it would be more accurate..

What's Wrong with David Futrelle: A Comprehensive List

What Futtrelle avoids mentioning is ofcourse the sound thrashing he received at the hands of Paul Elam, when Paul threw down the gauntlet and challenged this ranting, raging Lothario they debated those "Issues" that he claims to want to discuss, remember those "issues motivating those.." in the men's movement. The debate did not last long at all. The lothario gathered up what was left of his hubris and headed home, dragging his teddy behind..
Sad to say, well actually not really, that Manboobs took some time to recover, as his little spot in the corner, where he was licking his wounds and denying his medication, had to come to an end, sooner or later he would have to face reality again as he was actually starting to loose weight..

Feminists peeing standing Up, whoopie..

The problem that Frutthelle has ofcourse is the fact that feminists have built their argument on lies, exaggerations and half-truthes, no one is going to win any argument with that as their foundation. Add to that the copious examples of old feminists, their leaders like Friedan and Dworkin and the "female Pedophile" Greer, these women were seriously afflicted, either deranged (Dworkin), affected by psychological issues(Friedan) or demonstrated their warped outlook to the world with delusional, imaginary, greatly exaggerated books, going against their own beliefs (Greer, will not release her doctorate thesis as it would totally contradict her book "The Female Eunuch"), when asked about her childhood, it was her mother who had greatly abused her)..

When one looks at the overall standard of people who promote that feminist Movement, the "leading" feminists, most are authors of male-bashing, male denigrating books and studies and preach their hate on lecture tours disguised as growth opportunities. You can see why feminists are impossible to deal with. On most occasions, whenever you look at any prominent feminists on the web and delve into their background, you will inevitably find major issues in their own lives, either psychological or physiological (sexual deviance and lesbianism) issues and they use feminism and it's doctrine of hate to rage against everyone and that includes both Men and Women..

The Female Non-Teacher or How to Avoid Work..

2012-01-24T10:50:00.000+11:00

Note they show a male principal where the majority are now females..

As if the educational systems are not already screwed up enough by the total lack of male teachers. A direct reason why boys are dropping out or failing at school, that is obviously an area of no concern as generations of boys are relegated to the scraphead and only the "girl" is of interest..

Sadly and unfortunately, this "only girls matter", managed and staged operation instituted and ingrained into the schooling ciriculum will of cause bite those who benefit from it the most. That entire saga has dissappeared from the media, have you noticed. One would automatically conclude that the problem has been fixed and all things are just "puppy dog tales", best to leave it hidden..

The other side of the coin is this article below, where the dominant sex in the teaching industry are apparently not teaching at all but just sucking the blood out of the taxpayer. Obviously a growing industry as well. They fail to educate, they fail to control the kids and fail to ensure some reasonable level of education, so why not pretend to be a teacher and not teach, great erm, job, if you can get it..

Well why not blow a million pounds, there's plenty more where that came from and why use it for what it was supposed to be, it's not as parents actually care about what goes on behind close doors and just except the status quo..

by Neo-Guido

Pilgrim fans will love Julie Davies, a teacher in Haringey who hasn't stood in front of a blackboard since the turn of the century. Despite being paid £35,000 to teach English at Northumberland Park Community School in Haringey, Davies has been working for the NUT five days a week since 2000. Instead of teaching she seems to spend most of her time agitating against the government and leaving comments on Lynne Featherstone's blog. Guido particularly enjoyed the quote Davies gave the Standard:
"She denied being a "pilgrim" - a union official paid from the public purse. "I work really hard. I'm paid £35,000 a year by Haringey, and help when someone's in trouble. I don't work for the union. My substantive position is English teacher. If I stopped doing this [union] job I could return tomorrow.""
That's the plan Julie, that's the plan..

The Million Pound Pilgrim
Full Figures Reveal the True Cost Of Julie Davies

Guido has got hold of the original FoI response regarding Julie Davies, the teaching Pilgrim from earlier. As you can see the information provided was only in regard to 2002 and 2009. In this seven year period, Davies cost the taxpayer £679,198. This isn’t just her salary (£35,000pa), but the cost of paying someone else to cover for her too:

Given that Davies was also paid to do trade union activity for three days a week between 1997 and 2000, and five days a week between 2000 and 2002, the £300,000 figure quoted in the Standard tonight is way short of the real picture. Guido has been doing the real maths based on what she cost the taxpayer between 2002-09:

Sept ’97 to April ’00: 3/5 x (£679,198/7) x 2.5 years = £145,542

April ’00 to March ’02: (£679,198/7) x 2 years = £194,057

Add that to the figures given by the council and you get a cost of £1,018,797 up until March 2009. Add to that the £70,000 that Davies has been paid for 2010 and 2011, plus the cost of covering for her in that period and that figure hits £1,158,797. Over half-a-million pounds wasted on one teacher not teaching…

Nice Guys Finish Last..

2012-01-24T10:07:00.002+11:00

What is that about art reflecting real life, in this case it's music doing some reflecting. I am still wondering if the "Pill" has any accountability here or is it that women prefer arseholes naturally, need that excitement, abuse and attitude. Maybe they need someone who refuses to put up with their shit. A cry for help from females where they are saying "Stop me from being myself", probably the real reason..

Cannot say that it was as much the phenomenon in the past as it appears to be today. Maybe it is just being exposed more..

Nice Guys Finish Last is a fact and that is why we have the huge multimillion following "Game" sites that we have on the Web today, and that's not computer games, it's chasing pussy, games..

Why Women like Cats..

2012-01-24T01:29:00.000+11:00

There are reasons ofcourse why women prefer cats..

Similar habits maybe ?

A Huge Group of Girls..

2012-01-23T23:33:00.000+11:00

Ginmar and Her Version of Reality..

2012-01-23T14:51:00.000+11:00

Feminists Preferred Companion..

Unknown has left a new comment on your post "The Excommunication of Hugo Schwyzer..":

What a bunch of lying assholes you guys are. And seeing as how everybody has linked me to this, saying something appears to be the only way to shut people up in advance.

I have PTSD because I did---as my commander said to another guy with the same viewpoint as you-----"hundreds of convoys, with her as the gunner." That means I was up in the gun turret. This was in addition to being in a massive battle that took up half the city and lasted twenty two hours, while we were outnumbered twenty to one. To imply by omission that I'm some crazy bitch---let's not play games here----instead of a soldier going through what so many others have gone through exposes your standards quite completely. I'm not taking anti-psychotic meds, which are often prescribed for the sleep difficulties that afflict veterans. You get nightmares or crushing, near total insomnia, but I don't know why I'm bothering to explain this to people who have to be either horribly dishonest or horribly inadequate to miss the fact that I spent two decades in the Army. It's funny, this omission, isn't it? Half my Iraq company has PTSD now, in varying degrees of severity.

It often correlates with how much danger you were exposed to outside the wire, and as somebody who did a lot of convoys, I got very familiar with IEDs. I suppose if MRAs mentioned any of this it would blow the standard whine about how men have to serve, out of the water.

If anybody has any doubts about what dishonorable losers you are, this cinches it, and

I intend to make people aware of that. Seeing as how you doubtless won't post this comment, I'll do it elsewhere. And there won't be a link.

ginmar

Well, this is definitely a first. We have a typical response from Ginmar and it's about the standard response one could expect from an obsessive, dysfunctional, female supremacist, a feminist. I have had the displeasure of trying to point Ginmar in the right direction over the past decade or so, all without the appropriate affect, unfortunately..

Ginmar is one of those human beings who refuses to look at any issue and compare the pros and cons. As far as she is concerned, she has her opinion, everyone else is either a liar, some type of sycophant to some radical theory or doctrine or they are just way too stupid to see her point of view because of their inability to reason coherently..

Sound familiar Ginmar. You accuse people of doing exactly of what you do yourself..

I have no verification of any points you make in the above post and by the lack of that evidence, I can only assume that you are either fantasising or you are a just delusional. If I am wrong than I am more than happy to put in a retraction and post all that information right here, as the MM and MRA's are not about telling lies but establishing the truth. Not exaggerating the facts according to doctrine but facts as they stand. The truth will always out the liars..
If you have proof about what you are claiming is true regarding your service in the armed forces, being in Iraq and taking part in the fighting on the front, than where is the evidence ?

I have up until now never been made aware that any female has fought on the front lines or received debilitating injuries apart from that charade about Jessica whatshername, it has only ever been the men who have been deserted when they return and it's only ever been "women" who have benefited from being involved in the armed services via copious promotions and endorsement for medals they did not deserve plus the reduction in standards that allowed them in to begin with..

I am more than happy to post any information, as I have stated, to prove your participation and if that involves you given me that information via comment or via the email attached to this blog, then I can guarantee to not expose any personal information(I can find out your real name and details anyway if I wanted to), only those facts associated with your service. I will leave you to supply it as proof of your claims. There you go. Prove it. I am quite sure that my followers will ensure that I keep that promise..

Apart from that, Ginmar is a busy, busy person on the web as we have entries about Ginmar HERE, and HERE( her Unknown login) and HERE and HERE(Ginmar Bingo)

The bingo chart refers to the standard responses that Ginmar makes, her preferred robotic responses, one comes to expect from feminists while they deny they support a hate doctrine..

http://ginmar.livejournal.com/

This snarky female supremacists appears to be incapable of showing any appreciation for what men, any single man for that matter, does..

Ginmar

It gets better!She thinks we're not grateful enough----to men! In reply to an earlier post on

Jan 21, 2012 4:12:46 PM PST Tui Allen says: That is so true. I agree we women have been ungrateful for too much that our men have done for us. This post of yours presents the side of the story that is shown too rarely. These lawyer guys you describe are exactly like my dolphin character Rigel. I find it eerie to tell the truth. I love blokes who work hard and love their job. I have one who has supported me through the last 3 years of sitting on my backside earning nothing. He hasn't made a murmur about me wasting what should have been the highest earning years of my teaching or web design career.

During that time, he's worked his butt off and done more than his share of the housework as well. I could still give you a long list of his imperfections. I, of course, being SUCH a special snowflake, am quite perfect myself.

SDomebody whose books I will never ever buy, preaching about how motherhood makes you better than anybody else.

Yeah,I'd have some interesting things to say to her if she tried this crap in my face, too. Holy shit. Tags: jesus christ on a pony

Yes, obviously has some major issue with our sex as radical feminists do..

And ofcourse we cannot go past Facebook for some more information..

Ginmar Rienne

1.- Looks like Schwyzer got canned from at least two organizations over the weekend---one involved speaking to high school students about body image. Yeah, the very idea makes one shudder. But he said he tendered his resignation. Does he ever tell the truth?

2.- Smoke alarm went off due to low battery. At three Am. No sleep. Oh, and Feministing is disgusting. More drivel about forgiveness, but it's not allowed to mention brass tacks---like rape and attempted murder. Cowardly fuckers.

3.- So there's supposed feminists defending Hugo Schwyzer and fans defending Paterno and Schwyzer is whining about how teh poor menz' sexuality is demonized. Yeah, tell to a rape victim.....but he said he himself felt like a rapist. (Because he was.) And his lawyers are apparently going around demanding sites take down any kind of shit mocking him.)

4. - I couldn't do it. I had a seizure when my meds ran out; I also stopped being able to sleep and started having hallucinations, probably due to exhaustion. I also started having what turned out to be migraine headaches, which I've never had. I could go on and ON, but that's the background.

More hate mongering here.."And if you're a Rush Limbaugh fan, go fuck off and die, would you?"

Link to number 4..

Number four on the list explains her conditions and her medication including her suicide attempts. Those confession vindicate the article previously posted right here. Ginmar claims to have served in the forces and from the look of it it may well be the case but we only have her word for it (and she does have an ability to tell stories). I am loathed to believe anything she says or states and the reasons are that she has an intense hate of all men, generalises like all radical, male hating, feminists do and refuses to accept any other facts otherwise or maybe she just enjoys it..

Meanwhile, I have had a gut full of this obnoxious female and prefer to just ignore it but the challenge was there and here is her information(some of it) and the original demand stands..

UPDATE..Jan 24 2012

As I expected, I received an abusive email from Ginmar which was to rude and obnoxious to post here. This is the standard response we can expect from feminists, as we continue to expose their hate doctrine..

Spamming and Phishing your Site..

2012-01-22T11:45:00.001+11:00

I am always on the lookout for some suspicious behaviour on the web. One of my favourite is the length programmers and companies go to to appear to be casual in what is basically either a phishing exercise or spamming. As the Spam software Controls improve those programmers have had to be smarter in order to bypass all those hurdles..

Here is a great example on how they achieve it.

A comment lodged on one of my blogs, they are good -

Hello!

I just want to thank you for your wonderful blog radfemhubexposed.blogspot.com. I read the post "The Zeitgeist of Radical Feminists in AUS. Law.." and then I spent another hour on your blog by reading your posts with pleasure :)

Every article is interesting and easy to read. I really like the "A path to Australian apartheid". I work for Jooble company, we aggregate job adverts around the world. My job is to persuade bloggers to link to our site. I really love my job!

We have a friendly team and good management, but unfortunately I have no idea how to convince a blogger to link to us, I'm afraid I might lose my job because of it :( And that is why, instead of sending letters to thousands of different blogs, I am reading yours.

Honestly, I am not really sure if the link to our website in Australia - jooble-au.com, will be appropriate for your blog, but if you believe it will and you can add it, I would be really grateful to you! Our site is really cool, it can greatly help hundreds of people to find jobs. I wish you to have a good day and excellent mood! Thanks again for your nice blog. Write more! Thanks!

What sparked my interest was the fact they enjoyed that particular blog, just as I was about to pat myself on the back for doing such a great job according to them. What they did not realise is that it's a blog about Radical Feminists and how they want to remove half the population and blow shit up, so it's hardly enjoyable, RED Flag number one.
It goes on about enjoying reading that blog for an hour, which I doubt very much as it's not only sickening to read that shit by I doubt you could spend an hour reading it (Red Flag Number Two) unless you had some level of attention deficit syndrome..

Two red flags makes me even more suspicious..

I had a quick look at the code on this comment and it appears to be a little more than just a comment begging to be listed in the comment section This does come under the Phishing/Spamming category even though their comments are benign. bear with me -

<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1251">
<meta name=3DProgId content=3DWord.Document>
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 14">
<meta name=3DOriginator content=3D"Microsoft Word 14">
<link rel=3DFile-List =
href=3D"Jooble%20Corporate%20-%20Copy.files/filelist.xml">
<link rel=3DEdit-Time-Data =
href=3D"Jooble%20Corporate%20-%20Copy.files/editdata.mso">

<link rel=3DthemeData =
href=3D"Jooble%20Corporate%20-%20Copy.files/themedata.thmx">
<link rel=3DcolorSchemeMapping
href=3D"Jooble%20Corporate%20-%20Copy.files/colorschememapping.xml">
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>

This is just a fraction of the hidden program..

Now have a look at the processes followed here in this small segment of programming. We have a corporate mailing list set up in Word in order to access data, a mailing list they have already accumulated (either some search parameter was used to search for blogs and sites or most probably, an automated search program to access site data and information, web addresses etc.) They generate a standard form letter as above and make a pretense of having read a blog or site to try and implore you to link to their company in the hope of generating more business. Sneaky as hell but very cleaver..

Here are the details of the company involved..

Jooble is limited company registered in Cyprus with its registered office = located at: Kimonos, 43A, P.C. 3095, Limassol.

However there are always some smartarses about who can throw a spanner in the works..;)

The Excommunication of Hugo Schwyzer..

2012-01-22T01:40:00.000+11:00

Getting rid of the body and evidence, standard feminist coven practise.

The saga concerning Schwyzer really is a sad and sorry sight to behold. The sad part about all of this is that now the feminist hordes are just demonstrating what total hypocrites and sexists they really are. We have a so-called upper echelon member of the feminist hegemony, a male feminist, being castigated and marooned by the very church that he has attended for most of his life..

Schwyzer has spent years preaching the feminist doctrine, it's deconstruction theories. He even turned against his own sex in order to assimilate feminist aims and goals and apply them in real life. A task that is ofcourse impossible as feminist theories are based on assumptions and lies. Try living a lie and it will sooner than later, catch up with you. Schwyzer's mistake was to confess some wrongdoings, for which he was hoping to achieve some or any level of forgiveness. He was hoping that if he opened up and confessed his sins that the feminist church would expunge his past evils, he would pay for indulgences and move onto greener pastures..

What Hugo failed to comprehend a few simple things that he should have known right from the start. In order for forgiveness to be given, the feminist congregation he appealed to would have to have some level of compassion, (error number one), some indications of dignity within themselves,(error number two) some level of honour that had to be upheld(error number three) and a contriteness that the flock would have to share(error number four). They had to actually have some original level of compassion for it to be overcome..

He forgot about the mentality of the gathered assassins who had already determined that there must be someone who must pay in order for their order to continue. They decided that the transgression was just too wicked to be ignored and the price must be paid..

Remove Schwyzer, he is a male.

Imagine for a moment if Hugo had of been a Hugeena, how proud feminists would have been at her efforts. At her "power" to overcome what must have been a totally evil situation. Imagine the praise and glory she would have received from the same bunch of feminist hypocrites as they toss Schwyzer out because of his sex.Feminists will forgive anything female but a male is on borrowed time

We have stated all along that male feminists are only there at the whim of the "movement", while they prostrate themselves sufficiently and pay homage to their superior idols.

Out came the priesteses who consisted of same minded people as Hugo -

Here are some statement from Jill at the feministe site stating the obvious ofcourse..

Hugo to be banned from Feministe, link removed and comments denied..

Feministe is a community that centers on women and feminist thought..the decision to not link or promote Hugo’s work is one that all of the Feministe editors have agreed on.

.. I am committed to developing a feminist-centered and responsive, responsible community here, which means not linking or promoting Hugo.

No feminist has yet claimed any responsibility for the negative effects of the poison they spreead and promote which makes the above statement from feministe rather superfluous....

Also this comment regarding Feministe -

When I saw people were demanding Marcotte be banned from Feministe because she was friends with Schwyzer, that’s when I knew mob mentality had overtaken legitimate criticisms of Schwyzer.

What was that you were saying about building a "responsible Community" again Jill ?

So we have a group of people who are highly positioned and involved in the feminist hegemony and they are as follows -

Hugo Schwyzer who is a self confessed drug user, abuser and brags about having sex with young students. Regarded as one of the leading lights in the feminist movement who is aided and abetted by Amanda Marcotte, who of her own accord promotes hate and misandry..

We have -

Ginmar, who is on full disability and taking anti psychotic meds. she is a regular commenter on Feministe and feminists sites promoting the feminist hegemony and doctrine.

We also have

Male feminist Jeff (All MRA's are rapists) Fecke stabbing Schwyzer in the back in order to maintain some level of popularity, also prominant in the feminist hegemony pecking order.. "am going to find it awfully hard to link to him". One of Hugo's friends

And here we have another nail in Schwyzer's coffin or should that be another match for the pyre. Scarleteen (a sex education site) removing all of Hugo's articles and banning him completely..

Previously unknown information about this writer and his history has recently been made available to Scarleteen with which we have very serious conflicts, including conflict because Hugo chose not to disclose these things to us prior to working with us. For the benefit of the safe environment we always aim to create for our users, and in accordance with the ethics and practices of our organization as a whole, Scarleteen no longer wishes to be associated with him or his work, which is why his contribution was removed.

Seats will need to be booked as there will be a rush of bookings expected for the final removal of all rights and privileges, ofcourse..

The Pill and Picking the Wrong Partner..

2012-01-21T13:40:00.000+11:00

I have often wondered why women all of a sudden had major issues with staying in an relationship. Why they had no issues whatsoever about tossing out one mate for another and make that effort so blase as it could be compared with changing underwear or lunch venue for the day..

T'was not a problem pre-pill days as your long married parents will testify..

Now we have the situation where the female sex, while swallowing the drug that allows them to endlessly fornicate, turns out to be a bigger problem than initially assumed. I have heard many females complaining about the side effects of the pill and wondered if that was the all of it. I wondered that the daily consumption of a drug would indeed develope into a more "gregarious" life..

Sadly, the woman ends up picking a partner that appears fine at the time while she is under the enhancement of this drug but the withdrawal symptoms appears to be a real bummer. The end result too, which will be ignored ofcourse, as will be the effect to the Husband and the hell he is about to be put through..

More info on the link below for anyone interested in the academic studies instigated in 1995, where this condition was first noticed..

Picking the Wrong Partner.

MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans.

However, the COCP (P. The Contraceptive Pill) has an unexpected side effect: it reverses women’s scent preferences for men. It is important to remember that as far as a woman’s body is concerned, when she’s on the pill, she’s perpetually pregnant.

While no one knows why pregnancy might reverse a women’s preferences for male body odor some have speculated that once pregnant a woman no longer needs to risk going out to meet unfamiliar men with differing MHCs. Instead, she would be safest being protected by her father, brothers, uncles and male cousins whom she now feels more comfortable being around because their MHC is most similar to her own.
However, women on the pill these days will go out and meet the potential fathers of their children while they are on the pill; while their bodies think they’re pregnant. While they’re attracted to men with similar MHCs instead of differing ones. This is potentially a whole load of bad news.

The Pill is Eroding our Civilisation..

Many couples meet when the woman is on the pill.

They go out for a while, like each other a lot, and then decide to get together and have a family. She goes off the pill, gets pregnant, and has a baby. But her response to him changes. There's something about him she finds irritating- something she hadn't noticed before.

Maybe she finds him sexually unattractive, and the distance between them grows. But her libido is fine. She gets flushed every time she gets close enough to smell her tennis coach. Her body, no longer silenced by the effects of the pill, may now be telling her that her husband (still the great guy she married) isn't a good genetic match for her.
But it's too late. They blame it on the work pressure, the stress of parenthood, each other. . . .(P. But usually HE is blamed)

Psychology Today..

H/T Percy..

Why is Divorce Reaming Against Men ignored by the Payee?

2012-01-21T12:55:00.000+11:00

Richard (MGTOW) requested that I do an article about divorce court settlements and divorce in general, as the amounts being paid out to women, in most cases, just for being there. Having had no active involvement in the making of the money that she scoops up after the divorce. It is a well known fact already, that women's claim fame for being gold-diggers, they are even now looking for some DNA markers to see whether or not it is that deeply ingrained in their nature..

Once again though I resist coming across as making the generalities accusation, but how can one not generalise when we have the endless line waiting outside the courts and the final judgment demonstrating that marriage for women is indeed a very, very lucrative proposition. Ask the former Mrs McCarthy, someone worked out that she was paid $ 4000.00 per hour for the disadvantage of being married to a wealthy man for a few years. It must have been really hard, downright awful, poor thing..

Kobe Bryant Divorce: Vanessa Gets $75M in Property Settlement

Heather Mills wins £24.3m Paul McCartney divorce payout

Cleese's $23m divorce 'unfair' - leaves me poorer than her

So we have over 120 Million plus dollars paid out to three females who would, of their own accord, not stood a hope in hell of generating even a fraction of that money, using their own "talents". On the face of it it can only be seen as thievery, daylight robbery in the first degree. Those "partners" have no right to those fortunes as they do not possess an ounce of ability or talents that the three men above have already clearly demonstrated they possess. It has always been stated that the feminist hegemony is responsible for these ludicrous payout via intrusion into the legislation pertaining to divorce, one that it is designed to transfer money from Men to Women via their interference via jurisprudence, knowing full well they would stand a better chance of fleecing some funds from a deluded female than any expert or talented businessman. It is Men who have that ability of making money by persistence, hard work and taking risks, from minor to extreme amounts and it's easy to see where the majority of the richest women in the world got their money from and it was not because they were talented enough to procure it..

The other side of the coin is why there's not any action or lobby group actively trying to change the laws that have been instituted solely against them. Why have these wealthy Men shied away from committing any or some dollars to their own cause or to the Men's Movement cause beggars believe..

It almost appears that they enjoy the reaming they received at their own expense and probably too stunned to do something, anything about it. Anyway, that's what I am hoping anyway.

The Confession of an Addicted Feminist..

2012-01-21T10:00:00.000+11:00

Emma from Femifisting..

The fact that feminism is a life and soul destroying doctrine is finally being admitted, finally a confession that it's adherence does not only alienate any of it's enablers but basically will eventually destroy any possibility of having a normal existance. I laugh at the sheer stupidity of these women who have sold their soul to the Devil that they deny even exists. Unfortunately, that's the idea..

Such a waste of a human being as you can see..

It is not too often that we have a confession from one of their own -

Feminist High Horses By Emma from Femisting..

Being a Women and Gender Studies major, working in the Women’s Resource Center, and being a loud advocate for social justice sometimes leaves me without a sense of reality. To me, it is not enough to be progressive,

To any normal person reading the first sentence, they would automatically install some red flags about this Emma, more than two red flags and it's avoid time. First we have a female with a useless major, coupled with useless limited employment, alienation two red flags already. Coupled with a "no sense of reality", we have what have always considered to be a severe case of "Feministitis", this is a contagious disease that affect the central nervous system to such a degree as to remove reality.

Psychosis (psychosis |sīˈkōsəs| noun ( pl. -ses |-ˌsēz|) a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality.) is the main by-product of feminist doctrine, it's enabling and adherence.A condition noticed by everyone else but unfortunately it's not recognised by the individual suffering from it. So this is good as she has recognised her estranged condition, so there is hope..

I learn all sorts of theory, and that theory becomes a stepping ladder for my feminist high horse. Yes, I have a feminist high horse. Her name is Gloria Butler-hooks-Halberstam and she is badass, but I have to be really careful when riding. I wish she came with a disclaimer: “Ride and appear to be a pretentious, self-righteous man hater at your own risk.”

More confessions as we once again verify the "Male Hating" part of feminism, something they have always denied. Here it is in all of it's glory for all to see..

One final part of the confession as I am almost reaching for the tissues as this is just so (smirk, giggle, laugh) sad..

I don’t know if you’ve ever tried to explain Judith Butler’s theory of gender performance and the discursive recreating of the closet to an unsuspecting dinner party, but I have, and I wasn’t ever invited back. I understand, I wouldn’t want to have dinner with me either.

Sadly though, I had high hopes for Emma but it appears that she is just too far gone. To far down the rabbit hole and it's way too hard to crawl out. She prefers the "Male hating" doctrine as she feasts on it's stupidity, it's erroneous theories and elevated hypocrisy liberally dosed with with their own level of conundrums. Most say that addictions can be overcome but I do believe that she has the same problem as Amy Winehouse had, too far gone..

And here we have a complete listing of her fellow Male Haters at the delusional Feministing site..
All guaranteeing their later years will be spent sharing nights with their cats for company..

Samhita Mukhopadhyay Executive Editor

Vanessa Valenti Managing Editor Miriam

Perez Editor

Courtney Martin Editor

Chloe Angyal Editor

Jos Truitt Editor

Lori Adelman Contributor

Shark-Fu Contributor

Maya Dusenbery Contributor

Zerlina Maxwell Contributor

Anna Sterling Contributor

Eesha Pandit Contributor