Singularity News

Is Warren Buffet Betting on The Singularity?

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:52:00 +0000

Peter Thiel, PayPal co-founder, SIAI benefactor and Principal of Clarium Capital, took the stage at the Singularity Summit Sunday and gave a great talk about considering when and how to lay down bets on The Singularity. His basic premise was that along the bell curve of plausible outcomes, the most likely scenarios eventually migrate toward the tails: very wonderful or very catastrophic. And of these two possible outcomes, either is acceptable to investors.

On the “wonderful” hand, the run-up to AGI creates the biggest investment boom in the history of humanity, and the positive results yield a world of never-ending promise. On the “catastrophic” hand, advanced AGI gone awry causes humanity to disappear in a cloud of [insert your favorite existential risk scenario here] dust. In that scenario, the investor has bigger problems than the lack of return anyway.

Thiel believes that we may already be experiencing economic upheaval that is paving the way for the long boom. He asks, “What if the peak of insanity in March 2000 was really a peak of clarity? But those technologies were not the decisive sets of technologies?” What if the gyrations in the markets since then represent the global investment community lining up behind possible scenarios that they hope will produce “wonderful results”?

To illustrate his point, he discussed the investment strategies of Warren Buffet. He asked the intriguing question: Is Warren Buffet betting on The Singularity? According to Thiel, Buffet’s portfolio was traditionally focused on value stocks. But this has shifted in the last decade toward insurance and catastrophic reinsurance products. Thiel believes this is a classic adoption of the wonderful vs. catastrophic philosophy of Singularity investors. For Buffet, Thiel sees 4 possible outcomes for his investments:

1. Nothing bad happens: Buffet happily collects the premiums from his policy holders and maybe even lives to 1000.

2. A Mild disaster like 9/11 occurs: This helps the insurance industry in that it allows them to raise rates and drives more policy purchases.

3. A big catastrophe happens [Thiel showed a rendering of nukes exploding over Manhattan]: In this scenario, the rules get changed. The Government steps in and makes things whole for the insurance industry.

4. [Again, insert your favorite Existential Risk scenario] – No one is around to collect.

I believe Thiel is onto something here. I have always been a fan of “riskless profit”. That’s why I love investing in investment banks and casino companies and insurance firms. They are as riskless as they come. As long as the people show up, there is profit to be had.

Now Thiel brings a new dimension to this perspective. There is profit to be had in Singularity enabling technologies or there isn’t. Either way, it’s a safe bet.

Revising Asimov’s Three Laws

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:43:00 +0000

J. Storrs Hall is a noted scientist and author. He is chief scientist at Nanorex and has published extensively on the subject. His most recent book is titled Beyond AI: Creating the Conscience of the Machine (2007).

Hall spoke at The Singularity Summit this morning on the topic of revising Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics. As a refresher, Asimov’s laws follow:

A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

With Asimov, the 3 laws were “hardwired into the circuitry.” He envisioned the laws being codified in the circuitry. Alas, according to Hall, the Robotic AGIs (Artificial General Intelligence) of the future will be software and wetware. And “Asimov’s robots didn’t Improve Themselves. Our AIs, we hope, Will.”

So, Hall posed the question, “how can you imagine writing a law that is to govern in an environment you can’t predict. Like Hammurabi writing laws that predict the Enron scandal.” Our new “laws” have to be much more abstract and flexible – more like a conscience. According to Hall, we’ve done this for ages – it’s called raising children.

To punctuate his perspective, Hall predicted “by 2050 – most corporations will be run by their management information systems. Their first law will be ‘make a profit’.”

Hall’s New Laws of Robotics:

Law #1 – A Robot shall understand as much as possible.

Hall referenced Socrates – “there is no good but knowledge, and no evil but ignorance” as a basis for morality across cultures. The same should apply to AGI.

o Law 1a – in particular a robot shall understand mimetic evolution.

Mimetic evolution is the reflective or representative of actuality or reality of human experience (derived from Aristotle's concept of mimesis or imitation). This is important because evolution is where morals come from.

Law #2 – A robot shall be Open Source.

We live in a world largely run by artificial organizations that have no conscious – Corporations and Governments. But corporations are required by law to have an “open-source motivational system” – Auditing – because Money is their Emotion. Transparency to robot motives and capabilities will be critical with an AGI.

Law #3 - A robot shall be Economically Sentient

Our economic environment is the necessary outcome of evolution. We must train our AGIs to understand and appreciate the power of economics so that they will drive toward optimal decisions.

Law #4: A robot shall be “Trustworthy, Loyal, Helpful, Friendly, Courteous, Kind, Obedient, Cheerful, Thrifty, Brave, Clean, and Reverent” and shall do a good turn daily.

Google and Continuous Improvement

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:00:00 +0000

Today’s keynote at the Singularity Summit was Peter Norvig, Director of Research from Google. His talk was titled The History and Future of Technological Change, and he couched his presentation as an analysis of “how to evaluate technical change”.

This is the first time I have heard Norvig speak, and I found his talk to be extremely pragmatic. His trek through the art of predicting the future, to demonstrations of narrow AI to his list of AGI prerequisites pointed toward a technologist with a perspective firmly grounded in continuous improvement, averse to making high-risk, long-shot bets. If Norvig speaks from a place of authority on Google product direction, it seems to me that we should expect continued evolutionary innovation from GOOG, but they will leave the breakthrough innovation of AGI to others. This is an important observation for the investment community that has put Google on pedestal related to the continued release of major breakthroughs.

Norvig began his talk discussing how the predictions he was used to making are about incremental advancements in technology. A 1% improvement here, a 2% improvement there. He pointed out that predictions about AGI are 100% “or greater” improvement ruminations. He pointed out the dichotomy between other prognosticators. “We will all be dead in 100 years” vs. “We will live to be 1000 years old”. “AGI can’t happen for another 100 years” vs. “within the next 10 years”.

From there, Norvig took a detour through other concepts of “Artificial General”. He postulated about “Artificial General Space Exploration”, “Artificial General Materials Science”, and “Artificial General Culture” – equating these concepts to the emergence of AGI.

Here Norvig was at his most pragmatic. He sees continuous innovation in these areas bringing about a more advanced capability, but certainly no “rapture”, no “big bang”. He commented that “the Singularity is a period, not a point”. He sees a date in the future when we look back at the progress and say – wow that was a big change.

In preparation for this presentation Norvig used Google Scholar to query papers presenting breakthroughs in AI. His keywords were “AI” and “unlike previous”. From 1968 – present, Norvig can’t tell the difference in breakthrough claims, with claims of novelty repeating in the data set. This indicates to him that we are not on the verge of discovering something major in AI.

To bring about an AGI, Norvig offered his list of prerequisites:

Probabilistic First-Order Logic
Hierarchical Representation and Problem Solving
Learning over the data from above
With lots of data
Online
Efficiently

I think the recursive thinking nature of Norvig’s AGI underpins his continuous improvement philosophy, and also presents a very Googlian view of success. Let an algorithm loose on lots of data, and eventually it might get there.

Rodney Brooks asked Norvig a question during the Q&A session:

Brooks – Any emergent property of Google materializing within the massive systems that has been a surprise?

Norvig’s best answer was that he was surprised at how Game theoretic Google’s role in the internet is. Initially, he thought Google would be an observer of the internet – just serving up search results. Now Google is co-evolving with the web.

Revisiting Ben Goertzel

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 01:31:00 +0000

Almost a year ago, I did a podcast with Ben Goertzel. His presentation today was just as fiery and mind-bending as that discussion. His thoughts of using virtual worlds as habits for evolving AGI has continued to mature. Enjoy a refresh of the podcast below:

Singularity University Podcast with Ben Goertzel - The Promise and The Peril of AGI

All Watched Over...

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 01:12:00 +0000

All Watched Over By Machines of Loving Grace
- by Richard Brautigan, 1967

(and read by Paul Saffo at the Singularity Summit)


I like to think (and
the sooner the better!)
of a cybernetic meadow
where mammals and computers
live together in mutually
programming harmony
like pure water
touching clear sky.

I like to think
(right now, please!)
of a cybernetic forest
filled with pines and electronics
where deer stroll peacefully
past computers
as if they were flowers
with spinning blossoms.

I like to think
(it has to be!)
of a cybernetic ecology
where we are free of our labors
and joined back to nature,
returned to our mammal
brothers and sisters,
and all watched over
by machines of loving grace.

All Watched Over...

Singularity, Inc.

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000

There is a big change at this year’s Singularity Summit as opposed to the inaugural event last year at Stanford. Besides charging $50 to get in, the event has stretched to two full days, from one jam-packed day last year. The addition of that second day has brought about a profound shift in the agenda – the inclusion of speakers from many corporations pursing Singularity enabling technologies.

At last year’s event, the theorist presentations outnumbered the corporations’ 10-4. And the 4 were Ray Kurzweil, K. Eric Drexler (father of nanotech), Steve Jurvetson (VC), and Peter Thiel (SIAI underwriter).

This time around, the ratio has shifted to 50% of the speakers. Representing or talking about their companies on stage this year are:

· Sam Adams (IBM Distinguished Engineer)

· Rodney Brooks (iRobot)

· Neil Jacobstein (CEO, Teknowledge)

· Steve Jurvetson (Partner at DFJ)

· Peter Norvig (Director of Research, Google)

· Stephen Omohundro (Founder, Self-Aware Systems)

· Barney Pell (CEO, Powerset)

· Peter Thiel (Clarium Capital)

· Peter Voss (CEO, Adaptive AI)

There was even a "special" post-lunch presentation by Artificial Development, Inc. one of the show's sponsors. The event also has to be more transparent regarding why these corporations have speaking slots. Powerset, for example, is funded by Peter Thiel.

I think this is an interesting shift, but I am not sure that the majority of the audience is along for the ride. I think this event is at a cross-roads this year. It will either evolve into a business-centric confab with big-thinker keynotes (which I think will happen) or it will morph into a think-fest retreat – a mini TED. Either way, I’m looking forward to seeing the evolution.

Singularity Summit Talk: Openness and the Metaverse Singularity

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 23:16:00 +0000

Jamais Cascio, co-founder of WorldChanging.com just finished his talk at the Summit. Without powerpoint, Cascio told us a fascinating tale about 4 different scenarios as to how the Singularity metaverse might materialize.

He riffs on virtual worlds, mirror worlds, augmented reality, and lifelogging. The full text of his talk is available at the link below:

Open the Future: Singularity Summit Talk: Openness and the Metaverse Singularity

[Exclusive] Rodney Brooks Keynote at Singularity Summit

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:48:00 +0000

September 8th, 2007 Jonas Lamis

The Singularity Summit is a two day event happening this weekend in San Francisco. The event is being hosted by SIAI, the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence. This event is follow-on to last year’s Singularity Summit I conducted at Stanford.

Keynoting the event this morning was Rodney Brooks , of CSAIL and iRobot fame. Brooks spent his presentation discussing his perspective on the Singularity, and how Robotics (in particular the robots of iRobot and MIT) are advancing the science of Singularity enabling technologies.

Several times, Brooks referenced Arthur C. Clarke. He referenced Clarke’s quote of how technology capability is generally over estimated in the short-term, and underestimated in the long-term. This, Brooks believes is the most accurate perspective of what the Singularity is, and when it will come about.

Regardless of The Singularity, Brooks makes a persuasive case that “the future needs AI and robotics”. He referenced demographic trends – the aging global population, as the primary driver for a coming explosion in personal robotics. Brooks sees a near term future filled with venture financing and government funding to backfill the workforce of an aging and wealthy populous.

Brooks makes the case for applying exponential growth models to robotics. He used the iPod as a metaphor for exponential growth – forecasting that the iPod will hold the contents of the Library of Congress by 2013 and all movies ever made by 2020. In fact Brooks postulated the price / performance ratio for the iPod is calculated as:

$400 = 2 ^(year-2003) x 10 gigabytes

Brooks applied the model to autonomous robotic vehicles and referenced Stanford. He showed a video of a 1978 Robot cart that autonomously navigated 20 meters in 6 hours. Then noted that Stanley drove itself the length of the race in 6 hours in the Darpa Grand Challenge. He indicated that this means that the distance of autonomous guidance has doubled every 2 years.

Regarding iRobot:

Brooks confirmed that there more than 2.5 million IRBT consumer robots have be purchased.

Confirmed that there are 1000 Packbots in the field. He mentioned that this is out of a total of 5000 robots in the theaters of Afghanistan and Iraq.

He clarified that there are no armed Packbots in the field. He referenced the Talon as the primary platform currently being used for armament. He asked a rhetorical question about “when should robots have autonomous weapon targeting”?

He showed a set of pictures of a destroyed Packbot named “Scooby Doo” by its handler that was credited with over 15 disarmaments of IEDs.

He responded to a question about whether it was an ethically good idea to be developing AI and advanced robot platforms for the US Government. He deflected the question and stated that scientists must be mindful of the impact of their inventions.

Brooks was asked about why IRBT stock took a hit when it was announced that they are raising their R&D spending on commercial applications. He again deferred to comment specifically, but did note that he believes that there is a crisis in spending in R&D in the US. “This is a real issue, as companies get beaten down for putting money into R&D”. He notes that he has an article on this topic being published on xconomy.com on Monday.

Regarding emotional attachment to iRobot robots: Emotional attachment not a factor in military space. But is in home space. Where is Facebook for Robots? “Projection onto these devices that they don’t really deserve from a rational point of view, but we are not rational human beings.”

Regarding CSAIL Robots:

He spent time showing off the various emotional responses of Kismet. He discussed the visual attention system and illustrated the 3D emotional matrix used by the bot.

He also showed videos of Domo, a thesis project from Aaron Edsinger. Ednger has a new company in San Francisco called Meka Robotics, based on Domo research. A key concept is awareness of forces. Many movies of Domo are available on YouTube.

Harvard Makes Progress on “Biohybrid Materials for Soft Robotics”

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:45:00 +0000

[Cross Posted from our sister site: RobotCentral]

A team of scientists in the Disease Biophysics Group at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences has been working on interfacing biological material such as heart muscle tissue with man-made polymers. The team has figured out how to grow muscle tissue in a structured way so as to be able to begin applying it. Their method allows them to simply cut pieces of a thin film coated with microscopic stripes of living muscle tissue into whatever shape they want.

In a video published on their site yesterday, the team shows a successful micro-scale biomechanical muscle twitching semi-autonomously. They can control the kinematics by shaping the piece of the material in some deliberate way. The same video shows pieces of the material that were cut into triangular strips “swimming.” Another portion of the video shows a microscopic gripper opening and closing.

This technology certainly begets interesting conversation regarding the continued convergence of humans with technology.

Principal investigators on the Harvard Team are Kevin Kit Parker and George M. Whitesides. Co-Investigators are Adam W. Feinberg, Alex Feigel, Sergey S. Shevkoplyas and Sean Sheehy. The video was made by Adam W. Feinberg

Sources: Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (video), Additional material: NewScientistTech

Full Article: Harvard Makes Progress on “Biohybrid Materials for Soft Robotics”

World's greatest android projects

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:34:00 +0000

While doing research for our sister site, RobotCentral, I came across an interesting "Top 91" list asserting the world's greatest android projects.

According to the authors at Android World, of the top projects, 40 are in Japan, 10 from the US, 10 in Korea, 9 in Germany, 4 in the UK 2 in Sweden and 1 in a variety of companies.

World's greatest android projects

Enjoy the list!

Steve Jurvetson speaking at the Singularity Summit

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:06:00 +0000

I'm really getting excited about the Singularity Summit, coming up on Sept 8 and 9 in San Francisco. I'll be blogging the event.

Although we are still a few years away from mainstream understanding of the Singularity principles, it is exciting to see the wave of digerati associating themselves with the concepts.

When a high-power VC like Steve Jurvetson commits to a speaking slot, you can tell that tsunami of interest will be building behind him. Here is a link to a podcast previewing his thoughts on ZD Net:

Steve Jurvetson: AI, nanotech and the future of the human species

SciVee: Teach a man to fish...

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:11:00 +0000

SciVee is a startup website that is focused on publishing scientist created videos that correlate to published research.

By giving scientists a Web 2.0 framework to demonstrate and discuss their research they can covey key concepts related in a new and powerful ways that the written research alone can not.

While embryonic, this site is of note in that it is sponsored by high powered scientific outposts including PLoS, NSF and SDSC. Of course JoVE - The Journal of Visual Experiments - is the grand-daddy in this space having been in operation since late 2006 :-)

And I'd bet would could dig up some science on YouTube circa 2005 if we really tried...

SciVee: Pioneering New Modes of Scientific Dissemination

Google and large scientific datasets

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:23:00 +0000

Addition coverage from BBGM - mndoci.com

� Scifoo: Google and large scientific datasets � business|bytes|genes|molecules

Highlights from SciFoo

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:22:00 +0000

"Every hour there was at least one session I wished I could have attended, but the one I will single out here is "Give us your Data! Google's effort to archive and distribute the world's scientific datasets" by Noel Gorelick (formerly of NASA and now at Google). For a conference on the future of biology, technology, and science, meeting at Google's global headquarters, this was a rare session that focused explicitly on how Google is changing the landscape. Rather, Google now is the landscape, and the success of SciFoo offers ample demonstration of that." -- George Dyson in Edge 219

Edge 219

Robotics at MIT

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:05:00 +0000

“We’re all machines,” says Rodney Brooks. “Robots are made of different sorts of components than we are — we are made of biomaterials; they are silicon and steel — but in principle, even human emotions are mechanistic.” A robot’s level of a feeling like sadness could be set as a number in computer code, he said. But isn’t a human’s level of sadness basically a number, too, just a number of the amounts of various neurochemicals circulating in the brain? Why should a robot’s numbers be any less authentic than a human’s?"

Robots and Robotics - Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Artificial Intelligence - Science and Technology - New York Times

The Science of Reviving the Dead

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:33:00 +0000

Five minutes without oxygen is indeed fatal to brain cells, but the actual dying may take hours, or even days.

That the five-minute rule is not absolute has been known for a long time, and the exceptions seem to involve low temperatures. On Napoleon's Russian campaign, his surgeon general noticed that wounded infantrymen, left on the snowy ground to recover, had better survival rates than officers who stayed warm near the campfire. Scientists are now hoping to harness this effect to save lives today.

Back to Life: The Science of Reviving the Dead - Newsweek Technology - MSNBC.com

Seed: Rise of Roboethics

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:19:00 +0000

The close timing of three developments reflects a sudden upswing in international awareness that the pace of progress in robotics is rapidly propelling these fields into uncharted ethical realms

Seed: Rise of Roboethics

Nanospheres leave cancer no place to hide

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:14:00 +0000

According to researchers at Rice University, gold-coated glass "nanoshells" can reveal the location of tumors and then destroy them minutes later in a burst of heat. Eighty per cent of the mice treated survived for more than seven weeks, while all the control mice, who did not receive the nanoshells, died after three weeks.

Nanospheres leave cancer no place to hide - tech - 21 June 2007 - New Scientist Tech

Practical Nanowire Devices

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:00 +0000

Researchers at Harvard University and the University of Hawaii have developed an easy way to align nanowires and carbon nanotubes over areas 100 times larger than is possible using existing methods. The researchers are also able to fabricate the nanowires on a number of different surfaces. The advance potentially paves the way to mass production of electronics devices based on these promising nanostructures.

Technology Review: Practical Nanowire Devices

Military Working on Cyborg Spy Moths

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Wed, 30 May 2007 14:07:00 +0000

The creation of insects whose flesh grows around computer parts — known from science fiction as cyborgs — has been described as one of the most ambitious robotics projects ever conceived by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the research and development arm of the U.S. Department of Defense.

FOXNews.com - Scientist: Military Working on Cyborg Spy Moths - Technology News | News On Technology

How to make a human cybrid

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Wed, 23 May 2007 01:01:00 +0000

Two teams of British researchers are seeking permission to create 'cybrid' embryos that would be around 99.9 per cent human and 0.1 per cent animal to produce embryonic stem cells - the body’s building blocks that grow into all other types of cells.

Scientists allowed to experiment on hybrid embryos | Uk News | News | Telegraph

Silicon Brains Invade Stanford

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Tue, 15 May 2007 15:30:00 +0000

Kwabena Boahen is part of a small but growing community of scientists and engineers using a process they call 'neuromorphing' to build complicated electronic circuits meant to model the behavior of neural circuits. Their work takes advantage of anatomical diagrams of different parts of the brain generated through years of painstaking animal studies by neuroscientists around the world. The hope is that hardwired models of the brain will yield insights difficult to glean through existing experimental techniques.

Technology Review: Silicon Brains

Beam It Down From the Web, Scotty

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Tue, 08 May 2007 20:38:00 +0000

Beam It Down From the Web, Scotty - New York Times

"It’s not quite the transporter of “Star Trek,” but it is a step closer."

Treating The Dead

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Wed, 02 May 2007 19:23:00 +0000

A study at four hospitals, published last year by the University of California, showed a remarkable rate of success in treating sudden cardiac arrest with an approach that involved, among other things, a 'cardioplegic' blood infusion to keep the heart in a state of suspended animation. Patients were put on a heart-lung bypass machine to maintain circulation to the brain until the heart could be safely restarted. The study involved just 34 patients, but 80 percent of them were discharged from the hospital alive. In one study of traditional methods, the figure was about 15 percent.

Docs Change the Way They Think About Death
From Newsweek.

Pentagon to Merge Next-Gen Binoculars With Soldiers' Brains

noreply@blogger.com (jonas) — Tue, 01 May 2007 13:59:00 +0000

Wired magazine reports on another example of tapping into the prefrontal cortex to monitor subconscious recognition of potential threats that have not bubbled up to the conscious mind.

DARPA, as usual, has some very interesting projects ongoing with your tax dollars :-)

Pentagon to Merge Next-Gen Binoculars With Soldiers' Brains -