<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:blogger='http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8882665757516840333</id><updated>2024-10-24T05:59:12.842-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Voices of Reason</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8882665757516840333/posts/default?redirect=false'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Voices of Reason</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07425561145710851062</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8882665757516840333.post-8887205490438059444</id><published>2011-04-16T13:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-16T15:41:48.626-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Negating the Proposition: Why Does Income Inequality Matter (Closing Statement)?</title><summary type="text">
The fundamental point about income inequality remains: All income groups have made solid economic gains over the past few decades, and nothing in Mr. Mitchell’s&amp;nbsp;arguments&amp;nbsp;indicates otherwise.  

In the opening paragraph of his&amp;nbsp;rebuttal, Mr. Mitchell states that questioning why income inequality matters if all income levels are gaining is “a poor way of framing the argument as it </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8887205490438059444/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/2011/04/why-does-income-inequality-matter_16.html#comment-form' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8882665757516840333/posts/default/8887205490438059444'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8882665757516840333/posts/default/8887205490438059444'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/2011/04/why-does-income-inequality-matter_16.html' title='Negating the Proposition: Why Does Income Inequality Matter (Closing Statement)?'/><author><name>David Weinberger</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15578357789356068925</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhocRTRt41ULJ1NqkbVrlhlxoZS-7ZKq3lSsrB3rivFjgzij7rDvE5FSiqKG5j2_sf7wqLZzs_fBMkc_782Q-7ymXhP5PXlkI7WSvM2W30mSMwVzNnIcNyxMZsQFmVFV30/s113/David.jpg'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8882665757516840333.post-7932248456469113767</id><published>2011-04-01T14:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-16T15:45:02.917-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Negating the Proposition: Why Does Income Inequality Matter (Rebuttal)?</title><summary type="text">In his post arguing that income inequality is a problem, Mr. Mitchell charges that “most American households have seen little gain in income in the last three decades despite rising productivity growth.” He contends that from 1947-1973 there was “broad-based prosperity” because “incomes of virtually all Americans grew at around 2.5% annually.” Furthermore, he asserts, “income growth in the 1970s </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7932248456469113767/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/2011/04/why-does-income-inequality-matter_01.html#comment-form' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8882665757516840333/posts/default/7932248456469113767'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8882665757516840333/posts/default/7932248456469113767'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/2011/04/why-does-income-inequality-matter_01.html' title='Negating the Proposition: Why Does Income Inequality Matter (Rebuttal)?'/><author><name>David Weinberger</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15578357789356068925</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhocRTRt41ULJ1NqkbVrlhlxoZS-7ZKq3lSsrB3rivFjgzij7rDvE5FSiqKG5j2_sf7wqLZzs_fBMkc_782Q-7ymXhP5PXlkI7WSvM2W30mSMwVzNnIcNyxMZsQFmVFV30/s113/David.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMJxenmWcX6aTOw0-UjMpE_yYggF0xbX0lk5ghzkACRrF5xr0GeQUw5moHxM8lvDMnuTuHQJITIUu2-M8EFlqAf1NhTIfj2cN5j58ApP1P6xdwqIKew1UGmzjumHXyCEGc943PAN_z2Wxw/s72-c/income+inequality+graph.gif" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8882665757516840333.post-8277289557236089227</id><published>2011-03-11T09:11:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-04-16T15:47:00.830-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Negating the Proposition: Why Does Income Inequality Matter? (Opening Statement)</title><summary type="text">

When it comes to income inequality, the left argues that since 1979 the top ten percent of taxpayers are making an unfairly large portion of total U.S. income. This narrative is advanced by the widely accepted work of&amp;nbsp;Thomas Piketty and Emanual Saez, showing that “the top 1 percent of Americans now receive 15 percent of all income, up from about 8 percent in the 1960s and 70s.”&amp;nbsp;
It’s </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8277289557236089227/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/negating-proposition-income-inequality.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8882665757516840333/posts/default/8277289557236089227'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8882665757516840333/posts/default/8277289557236089227'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/negating-proposition-income-inequality.html' title='Negating the Proposition: Why Does Income Inequality Matter? (Opening Statement)'/><author><name>David Weinberger</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15578357789356068925</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhocRTRt41ULJ1NqkbVrlhlxoZS-7ZKq3lSsrB3rivFjgzij7rDvE5FSiqKG5j2_sf7wqLZzs_fBMkc_782Q-7ymXhP5PXlkI7WSvM2W30mSMwVzNnIcNyxMZsQFmVFV30/s113/David.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3zX6WZIi6xs_RaK9oX_6Ytvn8vEHlg9x1IoTvI2cgXXnjulF99UnWvCjBa7-MSY9QqhU1AYn1bKhG0Zzm9rtLjSRk9fxKGB4wKdFnnGscUdMTWBZbj4fcOIwGsmmEbXs9tfpIfzMybVE/s72-c/Inequality+picture.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8882665757516840333.post-1807422234551628999</id><published>2011-02-11T13:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-04-02T11:35:38.791-07:00</updated><title type='text'>About David Weinberger</title><summary type="text">David Weinberger is a conservative from Washington, D.C. He holds a B.A. in Business and Spanish from The University of St. Thomas and is the Communications Coordinator at The Heritage Foundation. His views, however, are his own, and do not necessarily reflect those of The Heritage Foundation.

Mr. Weinberger embraces classical liberalism, which he says means holding strong, conservative </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1807422234551628999/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/about-david-weinberger_11.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8882665757516840333/posts/default/1807422234551628999'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8882665757516840333/posts/default/1807422234551628999'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://voicesofreasonblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/about-david-weinberger_11.html' title='About David Weinberger'/><author><name>Voices of Reason</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07425561145710851062</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>