Patriot Warrior

Destroying the Congressional Fiefdom

2011-11-04T20:33:00.000-07:00

Know your Feudal Lords

The definition of a fiefdom is "an estate or domain of a feudal lord". The current behavior of the congressional lawn ornaments who never seem to be ousted by new blood, seems to be complete denial that there is a wave of discontent that stems directly from their actions. They believe that their status as elected official is safe no matter what the American people want. Attempting to get them fired will most likely issue in a candidate (whether a righty or lefty) similar to themselves. The only way to make a radical change in their ability to perform their leech like activities is to go after their domain. Every member of congress is appointed to a committee post and with that post comes responsibilities, and benefits. The responsibilities are the only side of the congressional smoke-screen that you, as the presumed idiot public, are allowed to see. The benefits are much less forthcoming. Your duty as a grass-roots activist is to enter this domain of the committee fiefdom and destroy the incumbent from the inside, before the next election.

Sowing the Seeds of Discord, to reap the rewards of liberty.

Attempting to oust a congressional lord can be difficult but knowing who your temporary allies is much easier. In every committee there are republicans and democrats who put on a show for those unfortunate enough to get stuck watching or listening C-Span for any extended period of time. The monologues may only last a minute or two but their effect on the viewer is nauseating. The democrats read from the democrat scripts and the Republicans prepare their lines as if it truly is impossible for them to think outside the red shrink-wrap suffocating the brain with endless party lines. However, when a democrat is a committee chairperson the party leadership loosens its hold on the lesser ranked republicans allowing them to be more creative in the attempt at foiling the opposition agenda. For instance, the ongoing "Solendra" subcommittee has leaked several key aspects of the money laundering that goes on inside so-called public-private partnerships. Federal loan guarantees were made to a company that had extremely strong ties to the Obama administration. They received 500 million dollars to do an incredibly risky building project. Soledra retained agreements to pay the private investors with public money if the business failed. The project has some very vital elements to understanding how effective destroying the domain can be. First, democrats kept many documents damaging to the federal loan guarantor secret from the record and the American public. Second, the Obama administration was forced to fight back against attempts to reveal all documents connecting them to Solendra. The failure of the business is what brought this matter to light, but corruption in any committee can be brought to light by picking the right ally and feeding him or her information outside of the party line.

Targets of Opportunity

The Transportation Safety Administration has a Committee Chairman who is fed up with the lies and failures of this ignominious agency. By targeting democrats on the committee with messages tying the T.S.A.'s screw-ups with the administration who created it and the chairman who appears to be: "nothing but talk".
Federal Reserve policy has been criticized by Barney Frank in consumer protection sub committee, but he has failed to act on such criticisms as chairman of the Financial Services Committee. He is clearly playing both sides of the isle against itself. Making an ally of republicans (other then just Ron Paul) in the Financial Services Committee who wish to score points with their party by daring, or goading Barney Frank to act on his criticisms instead of using them as political capital.
Darrel Issa is proposing a bill to "Expand Whistle Blower Protection". While he may want to actually expand protections, his party is supporting the extradition of the front man for Wikileaks, Julian Assange. Using this information and pointing out the hypocrisy, despite the possible good intentions.

Sustaining your Fight

With the recent long term protest movements like the Occupy Wall Street movement and Greek insurrection, sustainability should become priority one of any serious victory minded liberty activist. Unless we can branch out, network, and have the cash flow to keep the fight going until victory is achieved. Sustainability isn't something that the liberal greenies just made up to steal your money, the ability to sustain your force in a fight is how wars of all kinds are fought and won. If you think you can fight a war while ignoring your need raise funds is simply preposterous. There are ways to sustain yourself and your group even in dire circumstances. Using google ads on a personal blog can bring income enough to support letter writing campaigns, flyering, protest resources, and anti-media campaigns (more on that later). Using 'The Beast' as a tool for yourself and your fight against the NWO can be one of the best ways to unhinge the powers that be.
Please leave comments to help get ideas to the masses.

Is NBC's 'The Cape' pandering to a growing anti-government demographic?

2011-10-27T01:07:00.000-07:00

What is this show really about?

Strangely enough, NBC owned by bomb manufacturer and green tyranny supporter General Electric, has a show with thinly veiled patriot overtones. The cape is about a cop, Vince Faraday, who was framed for murder by a government contractor, Peter Flemming, hell bent on using the Hegelian Dialectic, and false flag events to bring in a total police state under his ARK corporation.Flemming has a super-villain alter ego, Chess, that can easily be likened to globalists like national security adviser Zbigniew Brzinski who wrote the book "The Grand Chessboard. ARK corporation has security personnel who dress in the all black SWAT style uniforms. This cop has an ally, Orwell, who uses the inverted all seeing eye as a prominent calling card throughout the show as she tries hackivism to bring down the ARK. Faraday is using the archetypal super-hero to fight against a vast global criminal conspiracy that uses Occult imagery (The Tarot) in pursuit of global domination. Despite being canceled after only 9 episodes, the show aired the tenth and final episode, entitled: Endgame, a direct reference to Alex Jones' documentary of the same name. Through the show there are constant references to vocabulary used almost exclusively by alternative media outlets and patriotic news sources.

Why would NBC let this show on the air?

The reasons why they would test this show out are simple: they see us as an emerging market and the dinosaur media needs to try to get out in front of informed individuals. They can't exploit your views if they can't anchor your ratings based on symbols and themes. The only problem is that they don't take you seriously. If a you could be brought in to the sheeple fold through fictionalized super-hero stories about things that are really happening. The poor writing and campy style of the show illustrate the lack of serious consideration the creators gave to the themes they're using to connect to the audience they are attempting to exploit. Clearly the attempt failed, because even with the highly paid B level celebrities and comfortable time slot the show never maid very much of an impact on the less then informed TV watcher.

The Irony

NBC is almost the perfect epitome of the corrupt corporate fascist organization the cape has sworn to fight. They use black propaganda against the public who supports and trusts them, they're owned by General Electric, who is clearly guilty of war profiteering, and their proud New York address was once owned by the original Corporate Fascist, John D. Rockefeller. Rockefeller wanted to give his Nazi friends a building in the complex in the 1930's under the name Deutsches Haus, but later thought better of it and changed the name. The problem with production of this type of show for patriot minded demographics is really that we know better then to be brought into a campy, fictionalized world where a single hero is capable of changing the world by vigilantism and subtle political influences. Imaginary worlds can't even come close to the reality we are faced with on a daily basis. The sole entertainment value of this show should be the amount of money spent to open up a demographic congenitally immune to dinosaur media propaganda. The information on NBC, General Electric, and the Rockefeller family is enough to actually get justice instead of just pretending for the sake of wasting time.

Adam Kokesh makes an Independent move

2011-10-14T07:18:00.000-07:00

Adam vs. The Man Visits #Occupy D.C.

Adam Kokesh has gone indie; choosing to move away from commercial television and support his operation through the viewers themselves. He's decided to utilize the web as the primary method of media takeover. Make sure to visit: www.adamvstheman.com for the latest updates.

The group Occupying D.C. has decided to push back against the powers that be, but the philisophical basis for their activism is a little bit muddy. Most of the people there are well meaning and generally concerned with the direction the country is going. However, there seems to be an undercurrent of Bolshevism. Bolshevism is a method of re-distribution of wealth through the use of government force. The idea that the 99% of the population has the ability to take the property of the 1% represents democracy out of control. When one group of people is able to take away the rights of another group the constitution of the United States is in danger of being nullified through totalitarianism. Take a look at some of the other videos he shot of the protests and leave a comment explaining your perspective.

What the new "Trade War" with China means to you

2011-10-12T12:28:00.000-07:00

The new 2011 Reform Act of currency exchange rate surveillance could mean a deepening depression in the United States and new wars abroad. The road to prosperity is not paved in corpses, but without knowledge of the issues you could be the one affected. Currently, we are at war with China over our outstanding debt, but there are ways to avoid a deepening conflict.

A Little Background

Darfur
These are Sudanese boys. This isn't where the bazaar story of the trade relationship between the US and China starts, but these people were used as pawns for where the conflict began. You see, Darfur wasn't what it appeared to be to all of us in the United States. It was the flash point of a trade war that the United States Senate has codified into law/treaty on October 11, 2011.
China wanted Darfur oil; the US didn't want them to go around the dollar, around OPEC, and through the artificially imposed layers of red tape and control the US loves to put on resources through international treaties and multinational organizations. They wanted African Oil badly and they were willing to do the unthinkable: Pay a reasonable price to the people who live on top of it...

Things like fair loans and Global South development aside China has a terrible track record on human rights within it's own borders. However, being communist doesn't automatically make you wrong in geopolitical dealings, because not every trade agreement is a take-over. China needs oil. they are second most in consumption but have nowhere near the political alignments the US does over things like oil.

If you think it's funny that there aren't anymore big Hollywood benefits for Darfur, then you're not alone. How could such a massive human rights issue disappear over night? China bought out all political parties involved in the conflict and the killing ceased. The US pressure to keep the conflict going wasn't as much of a motivation when it came to China's low interest loans. They bought out the killers and put even more money into the development of the Darfur Oil fields and instantly stopped the conflict. This was the first lesson they taught the United States in the up-coming trade war: Money can be used to create peace and prosperity, when not attached to crippling debt.

China Gate
In the 90's the Clinton campaigns burned through a ton of money. They were taking money from anyone who would give it. As Newsmax reporter Richard Poe puts it: "Clinton's top campaign contributors for 1992 were Chinese agents; his top donors in 1996 were U.S. defense contractors selling missile technology to China." This was a result of Clinton's consciousness of our mounting debt to China through the purchasing of treasuries. Of course, nothing can go wrong having a country like China buying up a third of our sovereign debt, and why would they ever stop? So, thinking that China our never ending, never fickle ally, and being the Rockefeller globalist that he is, Clinton gives away our nuclear secrets, vital sea ports along the Panama Canal (to Chinese company, Hutchison Whampoa), almost gives away our only deep water port on the Pacific (California's Long Beach Naval Yard), and generally betrays the rest of the economy with China's cheap (read: slave) labor flooding American markets giving you the Walmart generation you know and love today.

Treasuries Dry Up
     China is the #1 trading partner with the US-of-A not because of all the cheap crap we buy from them, but because of all the worthless debt they buy from us. Every time the treasury has an auction of fiat debt China is there to lap up all the treasury sewage produced from the current banking system in this country. I'll try to give you a criminally brief overview of how our debt system works: Federal Reserve prints up money to give to banks (locally and internationally) through sweetheart loans, they get this paper by guaranteeing the treasury that it has the money to back up what they print, the treasury has it's own auction which allows the FED to steal, I mean buy, the treasuries because other people are competing to get their hands on this worthless debt that the FED has spun up out of nothing, based on how much other people think that they can take from the tax payers (eventually), who are the only supporting factor in the ponzy scheme (for an even more cartoonish and accurate representation of this system look here). So what do you do when the only one who wants to buy goes around telling other nations that the debt they're buying is becoming less and less valuable? BLACK MAIL THEM!!!
     That's right, we in the duly elected Federal Government have weapons and we have debt, and if you don't like the debt you get the weapons. So now that China is bad-mouthing our mountains of worthless paper then it's time to declare debt, oh, I mean Trade War on China.

What's in store for YOU!
     So what happens to you if China decides to stop buying our treasuries? They've already stopped, and you didn't even notice. If you've been paying attention the last couple of decades you'll notice something strange about what we do when faced with economic stress from other nations; we go to war.

Libya

     What could supporting a bunch of rebels have to do with the price of tea in China? China looks at Africa as a very strategic trading partner. There is no single psychopathic ruler who black mails, and bombs the second an international challenge arises, prices are low due to the competing currencies, and people are ready to work. Making loans and creating mutually beneficial partnerships could provide stability to both Africa and China. To bad Uncle Sam doesn't approve. The Central Banksters love Africa for a slightly different reason. They want to use the IMF, World Bank, and dozens of other kind, liberal, and loveydovey organizations to cripple any threat to uni-polar dominance of resources. So what do we get:

Libya isn't about what you think it is. Muomar Qadafi had a gold based currency and despite the bad P.R. there was no reason for us to get involved whatsoever. Too bad, they have oil and Qaddafi could be a strategic ally of China in their never ending quest to destroy us, I mean stabilize their resources. So we bomb civilians and use our (somehow) strategic ally of Al Qaeda to forcibly destroy a country and set up a series of drone bases to terrify any other country who might consider trading with China outside of the US/International Bankster bureaucracy.
   If you want to join the military to attack our (somehow) strategic ally Al Qaeda because of what "they" did to us on 9/11. You might want to reconsider that. More likely you'll be fighting right along side of them to destroy other countries who may consider being a trading ally of China. More likely you'll end up being told that your own countrymen are the enemy and be forced to shoot at them (more on that in a minute).

Deepening Depression
     The recent treaty: 2011 Oversight Reform Act of currency exchange rate. It is like a tariff on the Chinese currency because they have refused to inflate their currency at a rate that is acceptable to the rest of the banksters. To put it another way: China has refused to rip off it's investors at a rate the rest of the rip off world finds pleasing. So as China is faced with the decision of what to do next, there are several steps it can take to make the lives of everyday Americans worse to black mail our crummy ass government.
1. Make more loans to countries who act as our proxy slaves
            By cutting of our supply of cheap resources through slightly better trade deals they can cause the prices of everyday items to sky-rocket based off investor speculation.
2. Actively engage in WWIII.
            All those nukes we enabled them to produce gotta go to something sooner or later
3. Influence the election cycles in the US to elect more China friendly candidates.
            There isn't a politician out there that can't be bought, having more China friendly candidates in the US can mean more of a fluffy cuddly police state so your family gets charged for the bullet used to execute you.
4. Call in all debts.
             To put the US in an even bigger pickle, all they have to do is sell off some of that worthless paper and cause the price to drop putting our economy into an even more endless toilet luge into hyper-inflation because of the need for more "Quantitative Easing". The one MAJOR disadvantage here is that China would be left with the toilet paper and a million creditors' delicates to wipe.

The Real Enemy
     Questions regarding what China will do are almost completely irrelevant to this issue. In geopolitical study, it becomes clear what all action or inaction is dependent on: What ever the hell the US feels like doing that day. The real enemy is the US Federal Government who is of the opinion that conducting business outside of the reach of our dollar is grounds for war. Sanctioning other countries with tariffs won't fix our economy or hurt China all that much, but wars used to cut off supply lines belonging to undeclared enemies is a nightmare of paranoid schizophrenic striking in the dark. Expect more Americans to die in unprecedented attacks on sovereign nations, Expect more inflation here at home, food prices are going to go up, and jobs will be lost to outsourcing. The debt is what makes decisions in the United States not the wealth.