Peace be with you

http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php

2011-07-07T11:53:00.000+06:00

http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php

The Truth Behind A Lie, Darwinism

2011-03-19T15:12:00.015+06:00

Charles Robert Darwin. A name for which, a picture of an old man comes
to our mind. Not without another one! The famous picture of Human
evolution!!! But the question is, is it correct? Does 'Modern Science'
agree with him or some 'Modern Scientists'? What does Islam say about
it? What about the famous Scientists? This article is for that
purpose.

Charles Robert Darwin

Absence of Intermingling Fossils:

The best proof against Darwin's theory is the absence of fossil records of the Intermediatory species . As the all of the currently living species have come through gradual Transformation of the Predecessor species lived Millions of years ago. So the theory will be proved, if The fossil records can be found. Darwin also stated that,

“If my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking most closely all of the species of the same group together must assuredly have existed. Consequently evidence of their former existence could be found only amongst fossil remains.” ( On The Origin Of Species By means of Natural Selection page no. 162)

NO FOSSIL RECORD OF INTERMEDIATORY SPECIES

“ …Why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?… But, as by this theory innumerable transitional form must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust to the earth?… But in the intermediate region, having intermediate conditions of life, why do we not now find closely-linking intermediate varieties? This difficulty for a long time quite confounded me.” (On The Origin Of Species By means of Natural Selection page 168)

Believing in Darwin’s prophecy, evolutionists have been searching for fossils and digging for missing links since the middle of the 19th century CE, all over the world. Despite their best efforts, no transitional forms have yet been uncovered. All the fossils unearthed in excavations showed that contrary to the beliefs of evolutionists, life appeared on earth all of a sudden and fully-formed. In their enthusiastic efforts to prove their theory, evolutionists have instead unwittingly caused it to collapse.

A famous British paleontologist, Derek V. Ager, admits this fact even though he is an evolutionist:

“The point emerges that if we examine the fossil record in detail, whether at the level of orders or of species, we find – over and over again – not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of one group at the expense of another.”

Another evolutionist paleontologist Mark Czarnecki comments as follows:

“A major problem in providing the theory has been the fossil record; the imprints of vanished species preserved in the Earth’s geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of Darwin’s hypothetical intermediate variants – instead species appear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fueled the creationist argument that each species was created by God.”

Entropy vs. Evolution

The truth of the second law of thermodynamics, or the law of entropy, has been experimentally and theoretically established. All foremost scientists agree that the law of entropy will remain the principle paradigm for the foreseeable future. Albert Einstein, the greatest scientist of our age, described it as the “premier law of all of science.” Sir Arthur Eddington also referred to it as the “supreme metaphysical law of the entire universe:” (Jeremy Rifkin, Entropy: A View, Viking Press, New York , 1980, p. 6.)

Evolutionary theory ignores this fundamental law of physics. The mechanism offered by evolution totally contradicts the second law. The theory of evolution says that disordered, dispersed, and lifeless atoms and molecules spontaneously came together over time, in a particular order, to form extremely complex molecules such as proteins, DNA, and RNA, whereupon millions of different living species with even more complex structures gradually emerged. According to the theory of evolution, this supposed process—which yields a more planned, more ordered, more complex and more organized structure at each stage—was formed all by itself under natural conditions. The law of entropy makes it clear that this so-called natural process utterly contradicts the laws of physics.

Evolutionist scientists are also aware of this fact. J. H. Rush states:

In the complex course of its evolution, life exhibits a remarkable contrast to the tendency expressed in the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Where the Second Law expresses an irreversible progression toward increased entropy and disorder, life evolves continually higher levels of order ( J. H. Rush, The Dawn of Life, New York, Signet, 1962, p. 35.)

Design without Designer!!!:

“Design”, briefly, means a harmonious assembling of various parts into an orderly form towards a common goal. Going by this definition, one would have no difficulty in guessing that a car is designed. This is because there is a certain goal, which is to transport people and cargo. For the realization of this goal various parts such as the engine, tires and body are planned and assembled in the plant.

Do you think this wonderful Creature is Designed without Designer??!!!!

However, what about a living creature? Might a bird and the mechanics of its flying be designed as well? Before giving an answer, let us repeat the evaluation we did for the example of a car. The goal at hand, in this case, is to fly. For this purpose, hollowed bones, strong muscles that move these bones are utilized together with feathers capable of suspending in the air. Wings are formed aerodynamically, and metabolism is in tune with the bird’s need for high levels of energy. It is obvious that the bird is product of a certain design.

Birds know this mechanism without any teacher!!!!!!!!

However, this truth is rejected by the theory of evolution. According to the fundamental assertion of this theory all living things go through minute and coincidental changes. If these coincidental changes help the creature then it gains advantage over the others, which in turn is carried onto following generations. The evolutionists who followed him put forth the concept of “mutation” on this subject. But , the FACT that falsifies this THEORY is the Concept of “irreducible complexity” . The definition of "Irreducible complexity" is that most of the organs of the living creatures function as a result of various independent parts. If one part disables, the organ will be disabled simultaneously. Any organ could not have developed in segments because none of the segments could possibly function alone.

Darwin himself said that, “If the impossibility of formation of a complex organ through a series of small changes was ever to be proven my theory would have certainly collapsed. However I could not find such an organ." page 169

Hence the concept of irreducible complexity demolishes the theory of evolution from its foundations.

Famous Scientists against Evolution:

“Evolution is unproved and improvable. We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.” Sir Arthur Keith

“Evolution is a fairy tail for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless.” Professor Louis Bounoure

Luther Sunderland asked evolutionists what evidence they had for their theory. The British Museum of Natural History has the largest fossil collection in the world. When the senior paleontologist (Colin Paterson) was asked why he did not show the missing links in his book he said: “I fully agree with your comments on the lack of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. I will lay it on the line – there is not one such fossil.” (Dr. Colin Paterson, Senior Paleontologist, British Museum of Natural History in correspondence to Luther Sunderland quoted in Darwin’s Enigma 1988, p. 89).

"Why does man behave like a perfect idiot? This is the problem I wish to deal with." (The crazy Ape Albert Szent-Gyorgy)

"From the almost total absence of fossil evidence relative to the origin of the phyla, it follows that any explanation of the mechanism in the creative evolution of the fundamental structural plans is heavily burdened with hypothesis. This should appear as an epigraph to every book on evolution. The lack of direct evidence leads to the formulation of pure conjecture as to the genesis of the phyla; we do not even have a basis to determine the extent to which these opinions are correct."—(P.P. Grasse, Evolution of Living Organisms (1977), p. 31.)

ISLAM ON CREATIONISM:

“He is God - the Creator, the Maker, the Giver of Form. To Him belong the Most Beautiful Names. Everything in the heavens and earth glorifies Him. He is the Almighty, the All-Wise.” (Quran 59:24)

“O mankind, We have created you from a male and a female and have made you into nations and tribes for you to know one another. Truly, the noblest of you with God is the most pious....” (49:13)

I like to end my article with the Quotation of Glorious Quran "And say: "The Truth has arrived, and Falsehood has perished: for Falsehood is bound to be perished." ( 17:81)

Should Men be allowed to have more than one wife?

2011-02-19T07:45:00.002+06:00

"A man having four wives?! Rediculous!!!"
This statement is one of the most common allegations stated by the
Non-Muslims as well as many so-called 'Modern' Muslims against Islam.
According to them, Polygyny is an injustice for the women . Is it
true? Is Islam the religion to allow this practice? Let's analyze the
religious scriptures and logical reasons behind it.
Does Quran allow it only? :
Infact, Qur'an is the only religious book on the face of the earth
which has the says that, "Marry only one."!!! The Qur'an says "...
Mary women of your choice two, three or four. But if you fear that,
you cannot deal justly, then MARRY ONLY ONE....'' (4:3).

That means,
Quran allowing to have more than wife , if the husband can deal
justly. No religious book even the Bible, Ramayana, Mahabharata etc.
prohibits Men to have more than one wife.

If you read the Bible, it is in 2 Samuel 5:13, 1 Chronicles 3:1-9 that
David (Pbuh) had several wives and concubines.
1 kings 11:3 Solomon (pbuh) had 700 wives and 300 concubines. The old
testament doesn't prohibit Men to have more than one wife. Rabbi
Gershom ben Judah in the 11th century prohibited polygamy in Judaism.
Jesus (pbuh) war born and grew up in a Jew community. But in New
testament there isn't a single verse condemning this practice.
The church in Rome prohibited polygamy in order to conform greco-Roman
culture that prescribed only one legal wife while allowing concubinage
and prostitution.(Ibid p.17).
It's also not prohibited in Hinduism. If you read the 'Ramayan', you
will see that, 'Dasaratha' the father of 'Rama' had three wives.

It is stated in 'Mahabharata' in Anushasana parva section no. 15 that,
Shree krishna had about 16,000 wives!! If Shree Krishna whom many
hindus worship can have so many wives, why can't Muslims have only
four wives?!!
LOGICAL REASONS:
There are many people who rely upon logic and scientific rather than
religious scripture. For them, we have to prove through scientific
facts and logical reasons. What is the reason behind this limited
polygyny? First of all it must clarified that, having two/three/four
wives is optional. Not compulsory. It is very simple. Naturally, both
men and women are born in equal proportion. But medical science tells
us, that the Female body can prevent more diseases than the male. For
this reason, more male children die than the female. Again when they
grow up, because of accidents, war or alcoholism more male die as
compared to the female. That's why, according to U.N. statistics
division in U.S.A. alone, there are about 4.2 million more women as
compared to men.
In U.K. Alone, There are about 1.1 million more female as compared to male.
In Germany alone, there are about 1.6 million more female as compared to male.
In Japan alone, there are about 3.3 million more female as compared to male.
There are some third world countries like India, where the female are
less than male. It's reason is female Infanticide and feoticide.
In a BBC documantary film "Let her die" shown in a programme
"Assignments" the statistics of female infanticide was given there by
Emetic Buchanan. According to there statistics, everyday more than
3000 feotuses are being aborted in India, on being identified that
they are female. That means every year more than 1 million feotuses
are being aborted in India on being identified that they are female.
It is very common in Tamil nadu and Rajasthan. According to Tamil nadu
Government Hospital, out of every 10 female children are born 4 are
put to death. For this reasons, there are 29 million more male as
compared to the female. If this heinous act is stopped after some
years or decades in India, the number of female will be more as
compared to the male.
That means, in Most of the countries as well as on the earth, there
are more female as compared to the male. That means, If one man
marries only one woman, many women will never find there husband. In
USA more than 4.2 million women will remain virgin. In UK more than
1.1 million women will remain virgin. In Germany more than 1.6 million
women will never find any husband. Biologically no woman can be
celibate throughout her life. So if my sister or your sister becomes
one of those unfortunate women, who didn't find their husbands, then
she has only two options, to marry a man who is already married and
lead a life with dignity or to become a public property! I know this
word "Public property" is very harsh word. But I don't know softer
word than this one.

NOW IT IS YOUR CHOICE, WHETHER YOU WILL ALLOW MEN TO HAVE MORE THAN ONE OR NOT.
--
Sent from my mobile device

God and Quran, just Religious belief or Scientific fact?

2011-01-27T08:40:00.001+06:00

We, the mankind, are the most fortunate animal on this earth as we are
prevalent on this planet. It's a blessing from our God. But fortunately
or unfortunately there are some people who don't believe in God. They
are called 'Atheist' .They say " There is no God " .
I'm a Muslim and believe that there is a God. I say " La ilaha
illallah " ( There is no God but Allah ) .That means I am a theist.
Although, I congratulate all the atheists. Many people may ask me "
why are you congratulating them?" Because they are saying the first
part of the Islamic testimony " La ilaha" ( There is no God ) . My
half work has already been done. There are many people who become
Christians because their parents are Christians, they are Hindus
because their parents are Hindus. But this person has at least thought
logically that these gods or goddesses can't be true. I personally
don't believe in such kinds of Gods. Now my job is only to make him
say "illallah" ( but Allah) which I will do God willing.
If I meet any atheist God willing I will try to kill two birds with
one stone by proving God really exists and Qur'an
is the revelation of God.
How to prove :
Suppose I met an atheist 'A'. I'm trying to prove the existence of God
to him. I congratulated him as previously I said. After that our
conversation goes on. Here these conversations are given like the
scripts of plays to make it easier to you. Here the best answers an
atheist can give are given.
Myself : " If any machine or any device is brought before you of which
no people of this earth can know, who can tell about that first? "
A : ''the creator/ the manufacturer ( some what similar. Don't bother
on his answer. Just keep it in your mind.)
Myself : " How did the earth came into existence?"
A : By big bang. It was discovered by G. Lemaitre in the 20th century
and proved by Arno penzias and Robert Wilson in 1965 by which they won

the Noble prize.

ARNO PENZIAS and ROBERT WILSON

That billions of years ago the whole universe was a
'super atom'. About 12-15 billion years ago it exploded and this
explosion is known as 'The Big Bang' theory.
Myself : But It was mentioned in the Qur'an 1400 years ago.
" Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were
joined together, before we parted them?..." (21:30)
How can a man living in Arabia write it by himself 1400 years ago?
A : (To defend himself) " By guess".
(Don't bother with his answer just carry on)
Myself : " how did the living things create?"
A : " it was created from water."
Myself : "when did you know this?"
A : " yesterday, 50 years back, 100 years back"
Myself : "It is mentioned in the Qur'an 1400 years ago. It is in the
same verse that "... And we made from water every living thing. Will
they not believe?"
How can a man of desert can write that 1400 years ago?"
A : " By guess"
Myself : "What is the shape of the earth?"
A : " spherical".
Myself : when did he know that?
A : Francis drake proved that in 1577.
Myself : The Qur'an says the same thing 1400 years ago. The Quran says
" And after we made the earth like the egg shaped" (79:30).

How could an illiterate man of desert can describe this 1400 years ago?
A : "Your prophet was very intelligent." (Dont grapple with word, just
carry on.)
Myself : "Is The light of Moon it's own light? ".
A : " No, it's the reflection of the light of sun" .
Myself: Quran says that 1400 years ago! It says " And we made the moon
light therein and the sun like lamp?" (71:16). Here the word used for
light is "نور" (Nur) it doesn't merely mean light. It means a borrowed
light or reflected light. Who could mention it 1400 years ago?
A : (Silent)
Myself : Is this universe stable?
A : No. It's expanding. It was discovered by Edwin hubble in 1922.
Does Quran say that?
Myself: No. It says
"With power and skill did we create the space: for it is who is the
great expander" (51:47)

EDWIN HUBBLE

How can a man sitting in the desert without any telescope write it by
his own hand ?
A : (silent)
Myself : After the Big bang what was the state of this universe?
A : A cloud of smoke. This is one of the undisputed principles of
modern cosmology. ( The first three minutes, a Modern view of the
origin of the universe, Weinberg, pp. 94-105)
Myself : But again! Quran speaks about this thing also. "Then he
turned to the heaven when it was smoke..." (Quran 41:11)
How could an illiterate man can imagine this thing? Now please explain
to me who wrote this book.
A : the creator, the manufacturer.
Myself : This creator, this manufacturer we say him Allah.
Does 'Theory of Probability' proves that? :
We can also use the 'Theory of probability' to prove the 'Existence of
God' to the atheist if yet he is not convinced. It was discovered by
Piere De Farma and Blaise Pascal in 16the century. If you have two
options of which one is correct and the other one is wrong the chances
of your guessing the right decision is 1/2 ( i.e. One out of two ).
Suppose you've tossed a coin the chances of your guessing right side
is 1/2 , that means 50%. If you toss again, then the chances of your
being right is still 50% but the chances of your guessing right in
both times is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4 which means 25%. Similarly your becoming
right in three times simultaneously is 1/2 x 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/8 i.e.
12.5%.
Now let's assume that Muhammad (pbuh) wrote thing by guessing. Quran
says that All living things are created from water. Muhammad could
guess it from sand, air, iron, alumunium etc. Suppose he could guess
10,000 things. That means the probability of his becoming right is
1/10,000
Quran says the light of Moon is a reflected light. The probability of
his being right is 1/2. Because therd are two options either it is the
light of it's own or it's a reflected light. The probability of the
guess of Muhammad (pbuh) in the both times is 1/2 x 1/10,000 =
1/20,000.
Again Quran says that the earth is egg shaped. The probability of his
(Muhammad (pbuh) ) being right is 1/30. The chances of his being right
in three times is
1/2 x 1/10,000 x 1/30 = 1/6,00,000. i.e. 0.0017%.
That means the chances of his writing by guessing is 0.0017%!!!!

There
are about thousands of facts in this Quran. I picked up just five of
them and apply the ' Theory of probability' on three of them. Just
imagine what will be the probability we apply it on all of the
scientific verses. The number of 'zeros' after the decimal point will
definity. According to science it equal to 'zero'. According to
Mathematics the Probability of any impossible thing is zero.
That means It is Impossible for Muhammad to write this book. So we can
say, GOD REALLY EXISTS AND HE IS THE AUTHER OF QURAN.
I want to conclude this blog by the quotation of Albert Einstein. He said
" Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind. "
--
Sent from my mobile device

Hijab, subjugating women or protecting them?

2011-01-14T22:58:00.001+06:00

Peace be with you all.
Many non-muslims as well as muslims have alegetions against Islam on
HIJAB. They say that "Islam is a ruthlesse religion. It subjugates
women by keeping them under VEIL ( HIJAB) " and etc. etc....
Normally when the speakers speak about Hijab, they speak about the
Hijab of women. But Quran speaks about the Hijab of the men first!!
Allah says " Say to the believing men, to lower their gaze and guard
their modesty." (24:30)

After that, Quran says " Say to the believing women to lower their
gaze and guard their modesty and not to show off their adornment
except only that which is apparent, and to draw their veils all over
their blosoms..."
(24:31). Their are 6 criterias of HIJAB.
1. Men will cover their body from navel to knee and women will cover
all over their body except their face and the palms of hands
2) The dress can't be transperant
3) The cloths can't be close fitting.
4) The cloths can't be so glamourus that they attract the opposite sex.
5) The cloths of the opposite sex can't be worn
6) The cloths shouldn't resemble the cloths of the unbelievers.
In that verse (24:31), there is a list of people whom she can show off
her beauty. The cause of this law is also given in the Quran. Quran
says " O prophet, tell thy wives, daughters and believing women to
cast their outer garment above persons, so that they will be known and
not molasted. Allah is oft forgiving most merciful."(33:59)
That means it's for the protection of the women. I give an example.
Today many of our sisters are suffering from molastation. Suppose two
beautiful twin young women are walking across the streets of New york.
One is dressed following Hijab while the another is wearing western
dress. And suppose some vagabonds are sitting by the street to molast
the girls. What do you think? Who will be molasted? The western
dressed one! It's a practical law. According to the FBI report 1996,
in every 32 second 1 women is raped in USA. For this reason, rape has
become a common issue their. Islam has a law that if a person rapes a
woman, he will be faced death penalty. Many People say, "death
penalty?! In this 21st century! Islam is a Barbaric religion." If you
see the American law that, their rapists go to jail. But according to
their statistics 95% of the jailed rapists again rape after coming out
of jail. So I ask you if USA applies the shariah law, that every
People will follow Hijab that they will lower their gaze ,guard their
modesty and the women will cover their full body except their hands
and face and after that, when a person will rape he will face death
penalty then what will be the situatition of the rate of rape in that
country? Will it increase, remain the same or decrease? It will
decrease!! It is the practical law!
For these reasons,
HIJAB IS NOT FOR SUBJUGATION, IT IS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE WOMEN.
--
Sent from my mobile device

peace be with you.

2010-12-30T21:08:00.000+06:00

hlw every body. I'm Abdul Muhaimin Rahman.

I welcome all of you with the Islamic greetings… ‘As-Salaamu Alaikum, Wa Rahmatullahi, Wa Barkatahu’… ‘May Peace, Mercy and Blessings of Allah (swt) be on all of you. I am a part time Preacher of Islam. I am in search of the allegations against islam. If u have any , plz let me know about that. U can cricize Islam freely. I can take that. Plz HELP me.