<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-567605863103436831</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2024 01:16:08 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>editing</category><category>quick tip</category><category>web content</category><category>jakob nielsen</category><category>word count</category><category>writing</category><category>BBC</category><category>SEO</category><category>accessibility</category><category>editor</category><category>eye tracking</category><category>headlines</category><category>links</category><category>reading age</category><category>standards</category><category>style</category><title>Writing for the web</title><description>Adventures and discoveries in web editing and writing.</description><link>http://spiderwriting.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (JL)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>9</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-567605863103436831.post-292059978894856499</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-03-24T17:12:55.058+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">editing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">editor</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">web content</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">word count</category><title>Remove an unnecessary word</title><description>Sentences in your web writing should be short - preferably no more than 20 words. This will make them far easier to read and has more impact.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you&#39;re facing a mammoth 40-word sentence you&#39;ll probably need to rewrite it completely. Try reading it aloud and summarising the concept to yourself -then writing down your summary.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But if your sentence is about 25 words long, try removing just one unnecessary word. For example:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#39;Recognising the work of schools that support other schools and make an invaluable contribution to system leadership nationally through their collaborative work.&#39;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;How about removing &#39;their&#39;? Or &#39;nationally&#39;? Or changing &#39;that support&#39; to &#39;supporting&#39;?&lt;/p&gt;You can even get together with a colleague and swap - remove a word from each other&#39;s sentences. It may become the latest craze in the office!</description><link>http://spiderwriting.blogspot.com/2010/01/remove-unnecessary-word.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (JL)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-567605863103436831.post-1932109713598820670</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-21T15:35:53.477+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">editing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">standards</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">style</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">writing</category><title>Using a house style guide</title><description>It&#39;s always billed as a bit of a task - &#39;using a house style guide&#39;. I&#39;m not sure why: surely it should make life easier. It takes away indecision and time spent wondering which format or spelling would be best.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We&#39;ve done our best to make SSAT&#39;s editorial standards an easy-to-access document. The PDF format has a clickable index and links throughout, and all style rules are listed alphabetically. Still, I think any house style document takes a bit of getting used to.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you&#39;re using a style guide for the first time, here&#39;s a few tips to get started.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Skim the whole document once to familiarise yourself with the layout.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;While you&#39;re skimming, pick out one style issue you learn for the first time. Write it down on a Post-it note.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Think of the one style rule you always need to check, or can never remember. Look it up and write down what you find.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Identify 3 style issues that most affect your own work. Look them up and write them down too.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Your Post-it note should now have 5 rules on it. Stick it somewhere visible on your desk as a handy guide.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remember: using editorial standards makes our writing more consistent, helps the organisation to appear more professional and can save you time!&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://spiderwriting.blogspot.com/2010/01/using-house-style-guide.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (JL)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-567605863103436831.post-9197139250394631799</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-07T17:03:16.437+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">quick tip</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">writing</category><title>Read it aloud</title><description>Quick tip of the week: read aloud everything you write.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&#39;s easy to get carried away with a sentence you&#39;re typing, and forget about punctuation. Try reading aloud to make sure you don&#39;t run out of breath mid-sentence; if you do, it&#39;s too long! You&#39;ll also hear whether what you have written has a good rhythm, and no &#39;hard&#39; words or tongue-twisters that will hold up the reader.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Listen to the voice you read in, too. If you put on a funny voice, the chances are you&#39;re not comfortable with your writing and it isn&#39;t &#39;natural&#39;. Try to write how you&#39;d speak, and the words will flow a lot more naturally and will be easier to read.</description><link>http://spiderwriting.blogspot.com/2010/01/read-it-aloud.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (JL)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-567605863103436831.post-6918629764464506296</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-08-20T16:51:56.177+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">editing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">eye tracking</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">jakob nielsen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">quick tip</category><title>Start from the left</title><description>Quick tip of the week: make your pages fit the &#39;F-pattern&#39;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This isn&#39;t a scary diet from the seventies! Readers of English scan web pages in an F-pattern, mainly concentrating on the left-hand edge. Their eyes dart across to read the title or headline, then again when something draws them in. So the pattern resembles a large capital F drawn on top of the page. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html&quot;&gt;See Nielsen&#39;s site for some eye-tracking results demonstrating this&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bearing this in mind, put your important things on the left. Start headings with the important words, front-load each bullet point with key messages and align decorative images to the right. Do everything you can to catch those eyes as they scan down the left margin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have one sentence you don&#39;t want users to miss (book online now, get more support, download a free copy, etc) put it at the top-left of your page.</description><link>http://spiderwriting.blogspot.com/2009/09/start-from-left.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (JL)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-567605863103436831.post-4847309317427678774</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-08-20T16:51:23.821+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">editing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">word count</category><title>Use fewer words</title><description>I read a very funny quote in &lt;em&gt;The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin&lt;/em&gt; last week: &quot;Never use several words when one will do. That&#39;s my motto, that&#39;s my axiom, that&#39;s what I always say&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comedy word-play aside, it&#39;s good advice for the web. Fewer words is almost always better. Don&#39;t say: &quot;There is no doubt that the vast majority of parents care about their children and what happens to them at school&quot;. Change it to: &quot;No doubt most parents care about what happens to their children at school&quot;. The important bit of the message is still the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fewer words you write, the more chance the reader will read every one. If you tempt readers to skip words, they may miss your important message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you&#39;re having trouble putting this into practice, let me know.</description><link>http://spiderwriting.blogspot.com/2009/09/use-fewer-words.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (JL)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-567605863103436831.post-7016260211929942992</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-08-20T16:50:17.717+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">accessibility</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">editing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">links</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">quick tip</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SEO</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">web content</category><title>Good wording for links</title><description>Quick tip of the week: give the links within your text a makeover and make them earn their keep!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In-line links (ones within the page rather than on a menu) are important because:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;they catch a reader&#39;s eye as they scan the page&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;visually-impaired users may have a screen reading tool which &#39;announces&#39; link text aloud&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;search engines spider them to rank pages according to its content.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
For all of these reasons, meaningless and generic text such as &#39;click here&#39;, &#39;this link&#39; or &#39;more&#39; is a waste of a good resource. You&#39;ve got a good chance to use some of your content&#39;s key words here, and to grab a user&#39;s attention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, when confronted with &#39;To find out more about the programme, please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.diploma-support.org/&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;&#39;, take the following actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Banish the meaningless phrases and make the important bits the link itself.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Don&#39;t bother being polite - it&#39;s a waste of words and makes the content sound as if it&#39;s asking for a favour.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Don&#39;t waste words telling users that a link is a link and describing what to do with it.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Mention the key words related to the link&#39;s destination.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Make the link an active call to action.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
You&#39;ll end up with &#39;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.diploma-support.org/&quot; title=&quot;Diploma support programme&quot;&gt;Find out more about the Diploma support programme&lt;/a&gt;&#39;. More informative, more succinct and more eyecatching.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please let me know if you find these tips helpful and whether you thinks it makes a positive difference on your pages.</description><link>http://spiderwriting.blogspot.com/2009/08/good-wording-for-links.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (JL)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-567605863103436831.post-673767564988197647</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-15T16:43:22.401+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">editing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">quick tip</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">web content</category><title>Put the important stuff first</title><description>Quick tip of the week: start your web pages with all the important information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can do this by:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;starting with a few lines summarising the rest of the article&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;using a bullet point list at the top to cover the key points&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;putting all calls to action right at the top (eg &#39;buy now&#39;, &#39;book online&#39;)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;listing important dates and prices before the lengthy description.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;If your readers are in a hurry, get distracted halfway through or don&#39;t realise there&#39;s more to see, they won&#39;t miss the bits most important to them, and to you!</description><link>http://spiderwriting.blogspot.com/2009/07/put-important-stuff-first.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (JL)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-567605863103436831.post-3288760000027787054</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-31T13:44:07.784+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">editing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">reading age</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">web content</category><title>Consider the reading age</title><description>Nobody wants hard to read web copy, so why does it still exist? And how can we improve it?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SSAT is an august and established organisation in the education sector. I think this means we often produce complicated and over-formal writing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our brand guidelines state that we should be open, approachable and friendly. Formal, hard-to-read web content does not enhance this image, so I spend a lot of time rewriting copy for the web.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I learnt a technique to help with this on a training course. It&#39;s based around the reading age you aim at. Web copy should aim lower than printed text; even adults aren&#39;t comfortable with complicated text when they&#39;re online. We read a screen differently to a book and spend less time working out tricky words or sentence structures. Typical users are in a hurry and scan for easy-to-read chunks of text.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The best way to deal with this is always to bear in mind the basic principle: fewer syllables plus more sentences.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Take a sample of 100 words and count the sentences. Then count the syllables. The fewer syllables and the more sentences the better. After a while you don&#39;t even need to count - your mind automatically looks for ways to replace long words with short ones, and to break up sentences.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Give it a go - choose some web copy and start counting, then work out how you can improve it. Do it now before you forget, and it will soon become automatic!</description><link>http://spiderwriting.blogspot.com/2009/07/consider-reading-age.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (JL)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-567605863103436831.post-7890682229185080197</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-31T10:45:22.630+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">BBC</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">editing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">headlines</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">jakob nielsen</category><title>Informative and effective headlines</title><description>I&#39;ve recently found a new and fascinating challenge at work. Our new page templates have very prominent news feature boxes which require short, snappy and informative headlines. I don&#39;t think we currently write the kind of headlines we need for this and I&#39;ve been considering what we need to do to be ready.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a freak coincidence, I received an alert from Nielsen&#39;s alertbox the very week I&#39;d started to ponder this! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/headlines-bbc.html&quot;&gt;The alert talked about the BBC&#39;s website&lt;/a&gt; and how effectively its editors write headlines every single day. Of course, this made me feel even more inadequate!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&#39;s true though: on any given day a glance at the BBC&#39;s news homepage will give you a snapshot of what&#39;s going on without even having to click through further. In an average of 5 words per headline, that&#39;s a fairly effective job of editing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So how can I use this information? First of all I&#39;m reviewing &#39;titles vs headlines&#39;. I think in most cases on SSAT&#39;s website we use titles and keep the same wording regardless of where these titles appear (on the page itself, in a list of links, as a featured story). I&#39;m starting to edit these according to where they appear, so that the wording is different for an actual headline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#39;m also planning to use the BBC as an example (again) in some web writing workshops; perhaps a &#39;guess the story&#39; game! Each of us can choose a story from SSAT&#39;s site and write a headline in 5 words, then see if others can accurately guess the story&#39;s content. I&#39;ll keep you posted on how well it goes.</description><link>http://spiderwriting.blogspot.com/2009/07/informative-and-effective-headlines.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (JL)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>