Ron's Tidbits

Grey Wolf

2025-09-20T15:42:00.000-04:00

Luddite Florida, Home of Ron DeSantis

2023-06-15T12:21:00.002-04:00

The Two-level Justice System

2023-06-15T12:19:00.002-04:00

Why Should I Pay?

2023-05-17T11:49:00.002-04:00

2021-02-28T11:12:00.001-05:00

Don't Tell the Grieving Mother "All Lives Matter"

2020-09-19T09:52:00.006-04:00

A knee-jerk reaction of privileged white supremacists to "Black Lives Matter" is a snarky "All Lives Matter." That response suggests they don't begin to understand the problem we have in this country with racism.

First of all, the fact that we have to be reminded that black lives matter means for way too long and in far too many places black lives have not mattered. It should be obvious that black lives matter, but it is not obvious in a society in which a young black man has to take his daughter with him when walking in his suburban neighborhood. A strong young black man without his daughter will be perceived as a threat and someone will call the police to report a "suspicious character' in the neighborhood. And then when the police arrive, so many bad outcomes are likely.

That is exactly why we have to be reminded that black lives matter.

And don't tell me all lives matter. Of course, all lives matter, but that is not relevant to our situation in 2020. If your spouses' mother dies and your spouse is grieving, one does not console the other by saying "Everyone has to go sometime." The fact that we all die is not relevant. This particular death is the matter at hand. Deal with it, don't try to generalize it.

Young black men and women in our society are being strangled and shot in the back at an alarming rate and we need to address that problem To the mother who has lost a child, do not say "All lives Matter." It is her particular young son who is lying on the slab in the morgue. Do not try to generalize that mother's grief. To generalize is to trivialize, and there is nothing trivial about the murder of one's son or daughter.

"Black Lives Matter" because we have in our midst many who think black lives don't matter.

Danielle Morgan, an assistant professor at Santa Clara University, was to meet her brother after a long COVID 19 inspired separation. Her Brother, a young black man was waiting for her on campus, when he was approached by campus security arriving in four vehicles. He was harassed simply for being there and being black. When the security detail arrived at Danielle's home. they asked her to show ID to prove her residence in her own home. This is why Black Lives Matter has to be stated. Too many people still don't get it.

And don't tell the parents of those listed below who were unarmed and are now dead that "all lives matter."

Unarmed Black and Dead:

TRAYVON MARTIN (Walking home with iced tea and Skittles. Shot by George Zimmerman, who was found not guilty.)

KEITH SCOTT (Sitting in car, reading. Shot by police officer, who was not charged.)

ATATIANA JEFFERSON (Looking out her window, shot by police officer, who is still under indictment for murder.)

JONATHAN FERRELL (Asking for help after auto accident. Shot twelve times by police, case ended in mistrial.)

JORDAN EDWARDS (Riding in a car. Shot in the back of the head by police officer, who was found guilty of murder.)

STEPHON CLARK (Holdng a cell phone. Shot 8 times, 6 in the back. Officers not charged.)

AMADOU DIALLO (While taking out wallet, 4 officers fired 41 shots, all acquitted.)

RENISHA MCBRIDE (Auto accident, knocked on door for help. Homeowner was found guilty of second-degree murder.)

TAMIR RICE (Playing with toy gun, shot by police officer arriving on scene. Officer was not charged.)

SEAN BELL (Hosting a bachelor party, 50 rounds fired by police officers, who were found not guilty of charges.)

WALTER SCOTT (Pulled over for brake light, shot in the back by police officer, who pleaded guilty to civil rights violations.)

PHILANDO CASTILE (Pulled over in car, told officer he had a legally registered weapon in car. Officer acquitted of all charges.)

AIYANA JONES (Sleeping, accidentally shot by officer in a raid on wrong apartment. Officer cleared of all charges.)

TERRENCE CRUTCHER (Disabled vehicle, shot by police officer, who was found not guilty of manslaughter.)

ALTON STERLING (Selling CDs, shot at close range while being arrested. No charges filed.)

FREDDIE GRAY (Beaten to death by officers while being transported in police van. All officers involved were acquitted.)

JOHN CRAWFORD (Shopping at WalMart, holding a BB gun on sale, police officer was not charged.)

MICHAEL BROWN (Shot twelve times by officer, including in the back. No charges filed.)

JORDAN DAVIS (Killed because he was playing loud music. Shooter found guilty of first-degree murder.)

SANDRA BLAND (Pulled over for traffic ticket, tasered and arrested. Suspicious “suicide” while in jail. No charges.)

BOTHAM JEAN (Shot at home, which police officer mistook for her own. Officer found guilty of murder.)

OSCAR GRANT (Handcuffed and face-down, officer shot him in the back. Officer found guilty of involuntary manslaughter.)

COREY JONES (Waiting by his disabled vehicle, was shot three times by police officer, who was found guilty of murder.)

AHMAUD AUBREY (Jogging, shot by two men who claimed they suspected him of burglaries. Both men charged with murder and aggravated assault”

And this is not a complete list. In the last six months, George Floyd and more unarmed black citizens have died at the hands of unqualified, under-trained, perhaps racist, police officers.

This list demonstrates why we need to remind ourselves that black lives matter as much as those of privileged whites.

Democracy's Enemy is in the White House

2020-09-12T10:19:00.001-04:00

Our democracy has always been under attack by our enemies, usually nationalistic totalitarian regimes who saw democracy as a direct threat to their authoritarian power. On the other hand, our democracy has always been flawed and we are still struggling to get it right. We have been making progress. Blacks, women, and eighteen-year-olds now have the right to vote, but our country and our politicians still conspire to create obstacles to exercising that right.

We have been getting closer to true democracy. And then 2016 happened. The majority of the voters chose one candidate, but because of an antiquated, pro-slavery provision in the Constitution, the Electoral College, the second-place finisher became the President of the United States. People around the world scratched their heads saying, "And they call that democracy? So much for the will of the people."

The winner of that election would later be impeached for soliciting foreign governments to interfere in our elections on his behalf. US agencies also determined that Russians had previously interfered in the 2016 election on his behalf. In August 2020, US intelligence informs us that Putin and Russia are again trying to influence the elections in Trump's favor and it's possible that the impeached President could be elected by a minority of the voters as happened five times in our history. Vox populi?

And now, what has the impeached Donald Trump wrought? A not so subtle attack on American democracy. In no particular order, He has:

- shut down the US Census a month early thereby preventing the poorest and least able from being counted

- appointed a political crony as Postmaster General who is ousting the professionals and in the midst of a pandemic is slowing down mail service in an attempt to undercut the vote-by-mail efforts. (Of course, Trump approves of vote-by-mail in Florida after he learned it was to his advantage there.)

- campaigned from the White House in spite of the fact it is a violation of the Hatch Act. (GOP senators ignore this abuse because they don't want to create a tweetstorm directed at them.)

- suggested posting the military at polling stations - a tactic of third-world despots.

- forced the Treasury Department to place his name on all the stimulus checks. And now, right before the election has a letter with his signature inserted in all Government Food Aid boxes. Both violations of the Hatch Act by a man who is campaigning on a law-and-order platform.

- suggested that the November election be delayed. Since he has no power to change the election, perhaps this was just another attempt to change the news cycle from Russia offering bounties for US servicemen. Also, at the same time, Trump was suggesting moving our elections, the White House was accusing Hong Kong of "undermining the democratic process" by postponing elections.

- made it clear that he and the GOP will do everything in their power (and maybe beyond their power) to suppress the vote. People around the world see an American president admitting that he wants to keep citizens from voting and wonder whether "American Democracy" is really a democracy.

- weeks before the election the President curtailed the Director of National Intelligence's report to Congress on foreign election interference. Apparently, he doesn't want Congress to know what Putin is doing to get hem reelected.

- attempted to discredit the Presidential Election in advance. One would think the incumbent President would be encouraging people to vote and doing everything in his power to protect and strengthen the sanctity of the voting process. Not our President. Fearing he will lose, he is already calling into question its validity. In fact, he has refused to say that he will accept the will of the voters. Democracy be damned.

- suggested to his followers that they vote twice, once by absentee ballot and then in person. Intentionally voting twice is a felony.

_ a deep admiration of dictators and authoritarian (anti-democratic) regimes. Not to mention, as one of his former wives informed us, he kept a copy of Mein Kampf on his bedside table.

In addition in Ohio, the GOP Secretary of State, Frank LaRose, is limiting ballot drop boxes to one per county regardless of population size. A direct attack on true democracy. One drop box in Paulding county (small population) and one drop box in Cuyahoga county (large population) limits access for urban black voters and is not fair in anyone's book. Ohio is just one example, most states with Republican legislatures are trying to suppress the vote.

History has taught us that democracy is quite fragile. There are always those, usually an authoritarian-minded nationalistic minority, who want to destroy it. Rather than compete in the marketplace of ideas and philosophies, they want to cease power by any means possible. Rather than engaging in democratic debate, they want to create distractions. Rather than lead, they want to dictate.

Required for democracy to work.

Sadly, we are at that stage in which democracy is under attack; and even more sadly, the attack is being marshaled by a man who took an oath to defend the US Constitution.

The solution to this sad state of affairs is for all those eligible to register to vote and then vote on November 3rd in spite of the obstacles erected by Trump and his GOP comrades. Vote early, vote by mail, vote absentee, or vote at the polls on election day and be prepared for long lines, and if they say you can't vote, request a provisional ballot. Our democracy depends on you.

Taxes Made this Country Great; Taxes Cuts Weakened It

2020-09-05T09:48:00.000-04:00

In the early 1980s, Ronald Reagan had this "great" idea -- cut taxes for everyone, especially the wealthy. The theory was that the benefits of those cuts would "trickle-down" to everyone and the economy would prosper and pay for the cuts.

Reagan was wrong. The economy went nowhere and the deficit was out of control. (Of course, the wealthy were happy because they were paying less than their fair share of the cost of running a democracy.) In 1982 Reagan had to raise taxes and did so throughout his presidency. David Stockman, Reagan's director of the budget and architect of trickle-down theory (their fancy name for it was "supply-side economics.") later admitted it was a failure and equated it to filing for bankruptcy.

But that didn't stop the Republicans. In 2001 and 2003, George W. Bush passed a tax cut, and once again, it was to fire up the economy and therefore would pay for itself. And it was no surprise that he was wrong. The result was Bush's Great Recession and the wealthy were paying even less in taxes.

It is worth noting that in between Reagan and George W. Bush was Bill Clinton who in 1993 passed a tax increase to reduce the deficit. Republicans were predicting disaster for the economy. Once again, they were wrong. The economy flourished and the deficit turned into a surplus for four straight years.

And then in 2016 Trump was elected with a minority of the popular vote and in 2017 the Republicans were back with their same dog-and-pony show. Their large donors wanted their reward -- another tax cut for the uber-wealthy and huge corporations.

So how do the Republicans justify these tax cuts for the rich and corporations? They claimed that business investments would "skyrocket." The fact is: "... the growth rate for new orders began declining immediately after the tax cut was passed, reaching zero in late 2018 and falling into negative territory in mid-2019."*

Trump and his "team" told us the GDP would increase by 6 percent and the tax cut would pay for itself. The growth boom never happened. Corporate tax receipts fell by 40% after the tax cut and the deficit is skyrocketing. Wrong again.

The GOP also promoted the tax cut as "a jobs bill". Fact: the share of the population with jobs continued on the same track as it had since the Great Recession. No spike after the tax cuts. They promised workers' wages would somewhere between $3000 to $9000. Didn't happen. But corporate profits skyrocketed.

And the biggest scam of all was they said they were cutting taxes for everyone. However, the tax cuts for the middle class were temporary while those for the wealthy will continue.

During every recent election cycle, Republicans bring out their old, disproven tax cut dog-and-pony show and every time there are gullible taxpayers who end up voting against their best interests.

Tax cuts for the sake of tax cuts is a fool's policy. This has been going on for too long. Our country's tax policy is a mess. Then, on top of it all, the Republicans continue to defund the IRS so that our agents do not have the resources to collect from the wealthy and corporations and therefore go after the middle and lower class citizens.

Perhaps in this election voters will see the scam. Trump is now talking about another round of tax cuts while our national debt has exploded. Will voters in 2020 recognize the con when they see it? Let us but hope.

*This quote and the statistical support for the claims in this blog can be found in Kevin Drum's "Death and Taxes" in Mother Jones July/August 2020.

Postmark Bayou Chene

2020-07-20T16:10:00.000-04:00

On a lazy summer afternoon, sometimes it's best to find a large shade tree, lean against the trunk and read a good book. And it's better yet if that tree is on the bank of a slow-moving river.

And to round out that picture, I recommend you read Gwen Roland's Postmark Bayou Chene, a languid novel that slowly meanders through the swamps of the Atchafalaya Basin of southern Louisiana. And stop at rural Bayou Chene in the year of 1907 and get to know Loyce Snellgrove, a young woman who hears and interprets the sounds, odors, and textures of the post office and general store since she lost her sense of sight years ago. She will introduce you to Lafayette "Fate" Landry who doesn't quite get life in the swamps and on the bayous. And then there's their friend, Valzine Broussard, who loves to be on the move, particularly working on the boats that travel the Atchafalaya River Basin.

Loyce's blindness adds a vivid dimension to the story since most of it is told from her point of view. We "see" the beauty and challenges of swamp life as she sees them, and she does not bemoan her lack of sight but embraces it. "I could busy my mind and figure out what was going on around me just by sounds..... I could tell by the milkman's step on the walk whether his feet were hurting that morning. The clang of the pans told me what we were having for breakfast just as if I'd asked the cook."

People, dead and alive, abandoned boats, drowning dogs, and of course the mail, all find their way to the docks of Bayou Chene. A particular letter which had been sent 40 years ago is returned to the Post Office since the Civil War prevented it from being delivered to an address in France. The sender's explanation of this letter suddenly changes the dynamics of this charming village.

In addition, there are newcomers to the Chene who provide a good dose of mystery and controversy. These two along with Loyce become a trinity of strong female characters who are central to the life of the bayou community.

The reader will unconsciously adjust to and learn to appreciate the rhythms of the river, the village, and the storyteller. Neither reader nor teller wants to rush the story along because the enjoyment resides in the rich detail of the journey.

The voice of the bayou country is central to the reader's enjoyment. For example, at one point, Loyce says, "Fate Landry, you just keep sitting eggs with nary a rooster in sight."

If a reader who has gorged on murder and mayhem is looking for a change of pace, I recommend Postmark Bayou Chene. Enjoy the rhythms and sounds of the bayou.

Bruce Springsteen: What Fear Has Wrought

2020-06-06T10:47:00.000-04:00

The Boss

As is abundantly apparent, the United States, after nearly 250 years of existence, still has a problem of racism. Despite all the progress, or maybe because of it, we still have a segment of our society composed of avowed racists and those who claim not to be racists but enable those who are. Unfortunately, as has been well documented, we have racists within the ranks of those who are "to protect and serve" their communities. In light of this situation, I have recalled some observations of Bruce Springsteen.

At one point he sang:

"Some say freedom is free, but I tend to disagree.

I say freedom is won through the blood of someone's son."

Sons like George Floyd or Ahmaud Arbery?

And in 1968 Mr. Springsteen reminded us that racism is based on fear:

"One of the problems in the United States is that “united in our prejudices we stand,” you know? What unites people, very often, is their fear. What unites white people in some places is their fear of black people. What unites guys is maybe a denigrating attitude toward women – or sometimes maybe women have an attitude toward men. And these things are then in turn exploited by politicians, which turns into fear – knee-jerk fear of the Russians or of whatever ism is out there. Or in a very subtle kind of indirect way – like some of our economic policies are a real indirect kind of racism, in which the people that get affected most are black people who are at the lower end of the economic spectrum. And I think somewhere inside, people know this – I really do. They don’t fess up to it, but somewhere inside there’s a real meanness in using things this way."

Let's hope that in 2020 we are ready to "fess up" and deal with our racism and reach the point that "driving while black" does not endanger some son's life.

The Perfect Storm of 2020 - The COVID Virus

2020-05-30T14:11:00.000-04:00

The killer has come for us,

and, sadly, we are defenseless.

The haughty killer is invisible.

silent, odorless, and voracious.

We, on the other hand, are helpless.

We possess no weapons to fight back.

We have no vaccines to prevent it,

no treatments to alleviate its effects.

And true to its nature, this pernicious assassin

Seeks out the ailing, the old, the infirm.

What's one to do, we ask,

Avoid contact with others,

wash your hands endlessly,

and cover your face in public, they say.

That's it? We have disturbingly little ammunition

to fight this hungry, mortal adversary.

But there's more to it than suffering and death.

This virus attacks our souls and humanity.

It takes our jobs,

it takes food from our tables,

it places our kid's education on hold,

it empties our arenas and churches

our restaurants, movie theaters,

and neighborhood basketball courts.

Without these, we become less human.

And if that were not enough,

politicians are using it to divide our country.

A president encourages people to violate

his own government's guidelines.

Elected officials suggest

we sacrifice the elderly

for the sake of the economy.

Some, when learning it was killing

people of color at a much higher rate,

suggested it might not be such a bad thing.

In the past, when the country faced a threat,

we came together, putting aside our differences.

Now, instead of fighting together against a common enemy,

we are being encouraged to fight each other.

Citizens are told wearing a mask is

a political statement,

an infringement on their rights,

instead of a mask being a weapon

to fight our common enemy.

Thus, the perfect storm!

But we are up to the task.

We are better than the dividers

We will not descend into chaos.

We will conquer this villain

We will protect the common good.

We will take care of each other.

In the end, we will prevail.

"Call Your Daughter Home" And Don't Mess with Mama

2020-05-21T16:10:00.002-04:00

If you are fortunate enough to have a daughter or daughters, you know that they are forever with you. Even though they may be in some far-flung continent, excelling in their chosen professions, helping to achieve a peaceful planet, or dedicating their lives to raising their children, they live in your brain and inhabit the recesses of your soul. That holds true even when tensions, known or unknown, have seemingly fractured the relationship. But in the end, we call our daughter(s) home.

Deb Spera's novel, Call Your Daughter Home, was recommended by a trusted friend and before I began reading, I had no idea of what I was getting into -- a fierce, disturbing, compelling, unforgettable, graphic account of motherhood. ("Your mama knew you 'fore you knew yourself. Mothers don't leave")

The signs of the coming Great Depression were manifesting themselves in 1924, in Branchville, South Carolina, where three women would demonstrate "the ferocity of motherhood." Gertrude, poor, white, and struggling; Retta, strong, black, and wise: Annie, educated, Yankee, and independent. All three mothers struggling with different, nonetheless similar, circumstances dictated by a male-dominated society. ("When a woman marries and takes her husband's name she is forever bound by his actions and not her own.")

As would be expected, the lives of the three mothers intersect in interesting ways which the author describes with impressive sensory detail. Most authors are accomplished at supplying visual and even auditory particulars, but Deb Spira uses all the senses. We learn not only what a piece of leather looks like and the sound it makes, but we also know what it feels like and how it smells, and it is that detail which makes some of the scenes unforgettable.

And. although I am not competent to judge, I suspect that the voice and the language are right on. Consider some examples:

"It's easier to kill a man than a gator, but it takes the same kind of wait."

"Old man, you've got nothing to say that I want to hear."

"Zero is zero, no way around that - still that's a real good thing for a little child of ten to learn."

"Polite make-believe is weary business, and there is no one better at it than Southerners."

"If one blinks, the others blind."

As I hope is clear, I thoroughly enjoyed this novel and was not surprised to learn that Netflix has purchased the rights and is considering a series based on it.

What's with Maundy Thursday?

2020-04-11T11:18:00.000-04:00

The Thursday before Easter, the day we commemorate the Last Supper, the last meal Jesus shared with his disciples, the origin of the Eucharistic ritual, the day Jesus washed the feet of his apostles. Also, this is the day Christians refer to as Holy Thursday, Sheer Thursday, or Maundy Thursday. The term Holy Thursday is obvious -- the Thursday within Holy Week. Sheer Thursday, not as obvious, apparently suggests that on this day Catholics purify their souls by confession before Easter Sunday.

But what is Maundy Thursday? It is difficult to find the word, maundy, in any other context than Holy Thursday or the alms given to the poor on this day. Therefore most of us think of it in terms of Jesus washing the feet of his disciples as they gathered for the Last Supper. This task would normally be carried out by servants who attend to visitors whose feet are dusty as a result of traveling by foot and wearing sandals. The fact that Jesus did this is a remarkable lesson to his disciples and Christians throughout the ages.

The word, maundy, however, has nothing to do with washing feet or eating a meal. It does relate to the Latin word, mandatum, from which comes our English word, mandate. It means "that which is required or commanded" and is related to the Last Supper because it was then that Jesus said: "A new commandment I give to you that you love one another; even as I have loved you..." This new mandate is the source of our English (or middle English) word, "maundy."

Notice that this is not a suggestion or recommendation, it is a mandate. Notice also that it doesn't tell us to love just our friends or people that look like us, think like us, or worship like us. "One another" includes the whole human family.

We still have the 10 Commandments of the Old Testament, but this is the commandment of the New Testament, the commandment that was essential to the Christian Revolution.

Although in recent years populist voices from around the world have been trying to tear the human family apart by spreading misinformation and hatred, the "new commandant" reminds us that our salvation lies not in greed, fear, hatred, xenophobia, misogyny, and derogatory personal attacks, but in the love of each other, no matter that the other is different. Black and white, Republican and Democrat, gay and straight, wealthy and destitute, Muslim or Christian, we all have the same "mandatum."

And one of the inspiring aspects of our present pandemic is that most people around the world are practicing the "new commandment," some to a heroic degree. Most of us, however, are loving"one another' by practicing social distancing and wearing masks even though it may devastate our source of income. As the death toll rises, the cases of so many people doing their share to help "one another" rise even more.

Sometimes tragedies remind us of the basics.

"Catholics for Trump" is an Oxymoron

2020-03-15T13:50:00.000-04:00

In the 2016 presidential election, a good number of Catholics voted for Donald Trump. If we are to believe the mostly anecdotal reporting, they did so for a wide range of reasons, but the consensus seems to be their vote was based on economic reasons more so than religious ones. If the vote had anything to do with religion, it was the anti-abortion issue. (Yes Virginia, there are some people who vote for a political leader based on one issue.) Now that the country has had three years to observe Trump as president, some of his Catholics supporters have become disillusioned and are experiencing "buyer's regret."

Given that erosion of support, this week Donald Trump announced he will be holding one of his staged rallies in Milwaukee, Wisconson, on Thursday, March 19 at which time he will inaugurate a "Catholics for Trump" organization. On the other hand, he has declared his intention to skip the annual St. Patrick's Day bipartisan luncheon with House and Senate lawmakers, because according to the White House he doesn't like Nancy Pelosi, who happens to be a Catholic. (Some think he is afraid of her.)

The idea of a "Catholics for Trump" organization seems a bit far-fetched considering that Donald's father, Fred, in addition to his other prejudices and questionable sympathies, disliked Catholics. But we must remember we are talking about Donald Trump. Why would we expect consistency?

However, the basic question is, do Catholic values and Trump's values (or lack thereof) coincide? The obvious answer is that both Catholics and Trump are pro-life -- recently that is. In an interview in 1999, Trump emphatically declared, "I am pro-choice in every respect." But then he joined the GOP "revolution" to embrace a pro-life stance because it was "politically smart." (Not a surprising flip-flop for a man who was a Republican, became a Democrat in 2001, and relapsed into the Republican fold in 2009.)

Catholics have to ask themselves whether Donald Trump's policies are truly pro-life.

For starters, although a few states, some with Republican governors and legislatures, for reasons of ensuring justice, are placing the death penalty on the back burner. Mr. Trump and William Barr, however, want to restart federal executions after a sixteen-year hiatus. The Catholic Church's pro-life stance has a long history of opposing the death penalty.

Secondly, Catholics must consider the pro-life implications of the Trump administration's attempt to cut funding for the food stamp program (SNAPS). and to emasculate the EPA. Life requires an adequate amount of nutrition, potable water, and clean air. Anything less is not pro-life.

Contrary to what he said when campaigning, Trump is now attempting to cut funding for Social Security and Medicare -- programs for the elderly and sick who invested a portion of their income in these programs all their working lives. Asking these people to pay for a large tax cut for the wealthy does not seem to coincide with the teachings of the man from Nazareth.

Other than the issue of abortion, do Catholic values and those of Trump align?

Do Catholics agree with Trump's immigration policy? Is separating mothers and fathers from their children and placing innocent children in chain-link cages a policy based on New Testament ideology? I think not.

The racist rhetoric of Mr. Trump and his enabling comments about White Supremacists should give Catholics second thoughts. The social justice position of the Catholic Church is at odds with racism in any form.

A list of Trump's misogynistic behavior and remarks is seemingly endless; and although the Catholic Church has not had a great history in this regard, the Church teaches Catholics to respect and honor women. Do Catholics want to be seen as approving Trump's disrespect of women?

Due to the COVID-9 pandemic, the rally in Milwaukee has been canceled, as should the idea that an irreligious Trump represents Catholic values.

Catholics, of course, have the right to support Trump or any other political candidate, but their choice should not be associated with their religion. And by that same token, bishops and priests should not be politicizing Catholic pulpits to support or attack a candidate.

As Americans, we need to keep government and politics out of churches, and religion out of the halls of government. and politics.

The Abuse of Scripture

2020-02-22T10:09:00.000-05:00

Modern conservative Christians use the words of St. Paul to justify the subjugation of women; fundamentalists remind us that Leviticus tells us that homosexuality is "an abomination;" evangelicals point to the Quran as justifying murder, and this list could go on and on, all because readers of scripture insist on taking the text literally.

And to make matters worse, rather than looking at the whole cloth, these literalists, both fundamentalists and liberals, cherrypick the various scriptures to find that one nugget that supports their belief.

On top of that, they ignore those texts which everyone realizes cannot be taken literally. In Matthew, we are told: "If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away." Obviously, Jesus is not advocating the mutilation of our bodies as a punishment for sin. Most readers realize Jesus is symbolically telling us to avoid temptation.

As with the authors of the Old Testament, Jesus and his audience were Semites and were comfortable with the use of symbolic language, even when it included exaggeration. Why is it that today we can't see the whole picture instead of parsing each verse in isolation? It's as if we fear vagueness and are unwilling to accept contradictions -- incest is wrong, but our forebearers, Adam and Eve's children, had sex with each other.

Although most of us understand that the parables are not reporting real events, but are being used as a vehicle to make a point, we insist on reading the other parts of the Bible as factual history rather than embracing the poetic contradictions and mystery of the Semitic authors.

In a recent book, The Lost Art of Scripture, a British theologian and former nun, Karen Armstrong, writes, "Too many believers and nonbelievers alike now read these sacred texts in a doggedly literal manner that is quite different from the more inventive and mystical approach of premodern spirituality. Because its creation myths do not concur with recent scientific discoveries, militant atheists have condemned the Bible as a pack of lies, while Christian fundamentalists have developed a 'Creation Science' claiming the Book of Genesis is scientifically sound....Not surprisingly, all this has given Scripture a bad name."

Since Scripture, even the New Testament, has its origins in an oral tradition passed from one generation to the next, we must know that we can't attach too much meaning to an individual word or sentence. I retell some of the stories my grandfather recounted, stories retold by my father. I can assure you both my father and I have embellished and reworked the details. The overall gist of the story is accurate, but it probably does not satisfy the standards of a modern historian.

Armstrong says, "A work of art, be it a novel, a poem, or a Scripture, must be read according to the laws of its genre." I recently watched and enjoyed a movie entitled The Irishman. Although the movie made frequent references to various conspiracy theories, I did not come away believing that those things were true. I knew I was watching a movie and did not expect documentary accuracy. What I did come away with was the story of an old, conflicted man looking back at his life and attempting to make some sense of it. When I read Scripture, I am not looking for historical or scientific facts. I can find those things using Google.

Scripture may help one arrive at some sort of truth, but it is not historical or scientific truth.

The literal interpretation of Scripture is an abuse of Scripture.

In the interest of full disclosure: As is probably abundantly clear, I am neither a biblical scholar nor a theologian, but one not need be to approach, appreciate, and benefit from Scripture.

Trumpster: "Don't like the man, like what he has done." Really?

2020-02-08T10:34:00.000-05:00

You probably have heard many Trump supporters justify their support for this man by saying they don't really like him, but they support the things he has done for their country-- notice, it's always "their country" or "my country.' but not "our country." They say things like: "He's not like me. I will never behave like him, but I am pleased with what he is doing for my country."

Nazi Slogan

Unfortunately, my friends, this sounds very much like what the Germans said about Hitler, They were willing to overlook Hitler's authoritarianism because they liked what he was doing--making Germany great again. They were willing to overlook his overthrow of the rule of law, because, after their defeat in WWI, Hitler's nationalist policies made them feel that "Deutschland uber Alles" was a good idea and that the "Final Solution" was part of making Germany great again.

And in Trump's case, his supporters like what he has done even though they don't want to be associated with his lack of morality.

Okay, so they like what he has done. Let's see, what has he done.

One of the most obvious things he has done is to divide our country as it has not been since the Civil War. Our enemies, particularly Russia, have been trying to accomplish this goal for years, and Trump accomplished it in a relatively short period of time.

In addition, he has in a few short years destroyed our country's reputation around the world. After he has unilaterally broken treaties and withdrawn from pacts and agreements, other countries no longer trust us. The American handshake has lost its credibility. His reluctance to fully accept NATO has some of our oldest allies wondering whether they can count on the United States.

Are these the Trump accomplishments that his supporters are so proud of?

Or perhaps they like his flirtation with the White Supremacists and the fact that racists now feel enabled by his rhetoric and behavior. Let's hope that is not what they like.

One of the things Trump has done that history will not forget is that he instituted policies that discriminate on the basis of religion. His Muslim ban goes contrary to our history and national character. Again, let's hope his supporters are not in favor of his religious discrimination.

And then there is what Trump has done on our southern border. Separating children from their parents and incarcerating them is not something we should be proud of. How many lives have been irreparably damaged as a result? We can but hope his supporters are not considering these policies a positive.

Another thing. Trump was impeached because he withheld military assistance to Ukraine in order to encourage interference in our 2020 elections. Strangely, even the GOP senators who acquitted him admitted that he was guilty.

At this point, Trump supporters are saying "But, but what about the economy? Our economy is doing so well. The Stock Market is at record highs. Unemployment is low. All is well."

All is well if you are wealthy because you were given a large permanent tax cut and the stock market is doing well. If you are in the middle class, you received a temporary and modest tax cut. If you are poor, you have, in this economy, very limited opportunities to improve your situation and you are losing the promised "safety net."

And looking at the bigger picture, we find Trump's economic policies have caused our national debt to mushroom. Candidate Trump promised to eliminate the nation's debt in eight years. But in reality, his policies will add $9.1 trillion during that time. The debt would increase to $29 trillion according to Trump's own budget estimates. Our country's debt exceeds our Gross Domestic Product. Now Trump tells us not to worry because we will just print more money. That's his economic policy? That indeed is worrisome.

Trump's tariff war with China has had several unfortunate results for our country. In the first place, China now buys significant amounts of agricultural products from Russia and South America instead of from our farmers. Secondly, as a result of Trump's tariff policies, our government is paying American farmers welfare checks to compensate them for the lost trade -- another hit on the budget.

Manufacturing Recession

In addition, manufacturing and good-paying manufacturing jobs are in decline. According to the NYT, manufacturing is in a recession, and although the unemployment rate is low, those who have manufacturing jobs, still find it difficult to get a meaningful raise.

And since Trump took office the number of people living in poverty has increased, as has the number of working poor. A significant number of Americans don't feel he is making America great. Many of the working poor have to hold down two jobs to stay above water.

So, when someone tells me they don't like Trump as a person, but they like what he has done, I fear they have been drinking the Kool-aide purchased at a Trump rally, You drink that stuff and your brain goes to mush.

Best 2019 Novels Read

2019-12-14T10:51:00.000-05:00

Since friends usually share some of the same interests, I often ask my friends what good novels have they read recently. And, in turn, they want to know what I am reading and/or recommending. As this year comes to a close, my friend, Buck, asked me to name my top ten personal favorites for the year (2019).

Buck and anyone else who cares, I settled on these novels. I am not sure exactly when these novels were published, but they are ones that I read this year. If forced to defend the order in which I have listed them, I would not be able. It's just my gut instinct.*

1. Where the Crawdads Sing by Dalia Owens. This was an NYT's bestseller, deservedly so. You will not be disappointed. My nomination for the best of 2019.

2.  The Paragon Hotel by Lindsay Faye. You may want to read a previous blog (3/2/19) with the title, "The Paragon Hotel: Nobody's Home."

3.  The Nickel Boys by Colson Whitehead. I enjoyed this one even more than his previous, The Underground Railroad.

4. The Testaments by Margaret Atwood.** This is a sequel to her popular dystopian bestseller, A Handmaid's Tale. You may want to refer to a previous blog((/28/19) entitled  The Testaments: Atwood Reveals the Future of Gilead.

5. The Book Thief by Markus Zusak. Although this novel has been around for some time, I just read it this year. The story is narrated by Death, the collector of souls, who tells the story of a girl coming of age during World War II in Europe.

6. A Better Man by Louise Penny. The fans of Inspector Gamache will not want to miss this one. Although each of these novels stands alone, newbies might want to start at the beginning of the Gamache saga.

7. The Huntress: A Novel by Kate Quinn. An English journalist and a Russian female bomber pilot search for "The Huntress," a Nazi war criminal. An interesting look at Russian women pilots in WW II.

8. Unto Us a Son Is Given by Donna Leon. This is the latest of Donna Leone's series about the doleful Comissario Guido Brunetti of the Venice Police Department. And of course, Venice has a starring role.

9. The Alice Network by Kate Quinn. A historical novel of two women and two timelines. In 1914 the one is recruited by the Alice Network -- a real female spy network that operated in France during WWI. The other is an American socialite searching for her cousin in 1947.

10. Lethal White by "Robert Galbraith" (J. R. Rowlings). The fourth in a series featuring private investigator, Cormoran Strike, and his partner, Robin Ellacott. A young man with a history of mental illness claims to have witnessed a murder some years before, and Coromoran can't let it go.

In creating this list, I gave consideration to recent works of Linda Costillo, John Grisham, Greg Iles, Laura Lippman, Leanne Moriarity, and John Sanford. Although I did not include them in the "top 10," I enjoyed reading their recent works and would definitely recommend their latest.

* I do, however, have some vague criteria. I like: 1) characters, good, bad, or ugly, whom I consider original; 2) a captivating story that makes me keep reading when I know I should be doing something else; 3) a distinct writing style; 4) content that forces me to think, perhaps in new ways; 5) realistic, but also clever, dialogue.

** A co-winner of the 2019 Booker Prize for Fiction.

The World According to Trump

2019-11-16T10:17:00.000-05:00

Apparently, we all tend to view the world from our own perspective and often try to make reality conform to that perspective.

And then, there's Donald Trump. He has created an "alternative" universe for himself and his cult.

In Trump's world:

"I am the Chosen One."
The Christian Crusades were Europe's proudest moment.
Hitler's Mein Kampf was the acme of civilization.
Russia is our friend.
The United States Constitution is obsolete.

The Eight Beatitudes are fake Christianity.
Jesus was blond with blue eyes and spoke English.
Mexicans are "animals" and "bad hombres."
The First Amendment was a colossal mistake.
Bone spurs come and go as needed.

Greenland is for sale.
Paris is part of Germany
Belgium is a beautiful city.
The state of Colorado borders Mexico.
Minneapolis is one of the fifty states.
"I am a stable genius."
"I slept with Princess Diana."

Weather maps enhanced with a sharpie are convincing,
We should rid ourselves of hurricanes by nuking them.
Climate change is a hoax.
Scientists are a threat to our country.
Puerto Ricans are not Americans.

Friends are disposable once they've served their purpose.
Treaties and International agreements are made to be broken.
Our allies are expendable.
Gold Star parents* are whiny and pathetic.
The Nineteenth Amendment --Women's Suffrage -- a really bad idea.

Fox News is a real news organization,
Bribery and extortion are the "American Way."
Charitable foundations are a good way to pay legal bills.
There is one god and only one god -- money.
Bankruptcy is the consummate way to avoid paying your bills.

Homelessness started two years ago.
Ivanka created 14 million jobs last year.
We and Turkey have a great relationship with the Kurds.
Windmills cause cancer.
NATO is passe'.

"People are flushing their toilets 10 times, 15 times.." ??? In Trump's world?
"...laws allow a baby to be born from his or her womb in the 9th month. It is wrong."
George Washington seized the airports.
Forest fires can be prevented by raking the forest floor.
There is too much "negative press covfefe."
(I'm tired.)

As you know, I could keep going with this list of Trump's augmented reality, but frankly, dear reader, you deserve a break from this nonsense. Also, I am confident that you could add many more examples of Trump's delusional reality.

Notice I have not included cases of outright lies--statement diametrically opposed to the facts. The Washington Post has done a good job keeping a tally of those lies.

Unfortunately, all of this nonsense is emanating from the President of the United States. Not only has he lowered the bar for all future presidents, but he has also ruined the credibility of the United States of America. What ally will be willing to trust us? Ask the Kurds.

*Parents of a child who served in the Armed Forces and was killed in battle.

Humorless and Friendless

2019-11-03T08:53:00.001-05:00

When my friend, Buck, and I had lunch together at Nick's Diner, the conversation took an unfortunate turn and we ended up discussing our current president. Since Buck is a conservative Republican and I am a progressive Democrat, we have had many political arguments over the years; but since 2016 we have agreed more often than not. We both are appalled and embarrassed that Donald J. Trump is the president of this great country.

Buck is fond of reminding anyone who listens that Trump is not a true conservative as many Republican conservative columnists have made clear. Our waitress, Salina, approached the table as Buck was complaining about the trillions of dollars Trump was adding to the deficit.

"May I tempt you gentleman to a dessert?" she asked.

This, of course, was a perfect set-up for Buck. "As you can clearly see, there is only one gentleman at this table and it is not that radical sitting across from me."

Salina turned to me, "It's my pleasure, I always wanted to meet a radical. I'm not interested in gentlemen." I gave Buck a thumbs-up, and he snorted in his iced-tea.

After we asked for our checks, we were back to Trump, and I asked, "Policy aside, why do you dislike the guy so much?"

"As a bard once said, let me count the ways." A pause. "First, I can't abide a man with no sense of humor. The man can't begin to comprehend, let alone appreciate, humor. He refuses to attend the Washington Press Corps Roast because he doesn't get it. The idea of honoring someone by making jokes about him is beyond Trump's comprehension. Have you ever heard him say something humorous? And of course, satire is too complicated for him. He thinks he's being humorous when he tweets that so-and-so is 'a bitch.' That's it; name-calling is his version of humor."

"I'll not point out that earlier you did a bit of name-calling. But I understand your point about a sense of humor. I can't help but recall that was a criticism of Hitler. That aside, I sense you have other issues with Donald?"

"We don't have enough time for me to list all of his personal character flaws, but there is another factor that is a real red flag and that is that he has no friends. Everybody has friends, you say? Well, name one true friend of Donald Trump. People, of course, say they are his friends because that is to their benefit, but when push comes to shove, they know he will throw them under the bus and move on. A person that repeatedly does that has no friends. Trump has no friends. Even people with conflicting ideas become friends. Take Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill, or Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia. But Trump has no friends, not even people who agree with him."

"What," I ask, "about Vladimir Putin? Trump claims they're friends and he seems to repeatedly make decisions that ultimately help Russia and Putin.",

"They're not friends. Neither is capable of friendship. In Trump's case, it's all about money and fame. In Putin's case, it's all about power and his ability to manipulate Trump. That's not friendship. A puppeteer and his puppet are not friends."

As we were walking to our cars, it occurred to me that DonaldTrump accomplished what I had never envisioned: Buck and I are in agreement on a political issue.

They vs. He or She

2019-10-02T15:53:00.000-04:00

How do you feel about the following sentence? "Somebody left their briefcase in the restroom." Some of us will feel sorry for the poor cretin who lost his or her briefcase; others of us will feel no sympathy for the poor devil but will fixate on the fact that the author used a plural pronoun, their, to refer back to the singular antecedent, "somebody." For shame! How can "they" or its forms, them, their, and themselves, be a pronoun for a single person? An abomination! Sister Pius should rap your knuckles with a ruler for such an abuse of the English language.

So, what's a person to do? The purists, I presume, would want the sentence to read: "Somebody left his or her briefcase in the restroom." That is downright awkward, my friend. Not to mention the germs that briefcase has been exposed to.

The problem is the English language does not have a gender-neutral singular pronoun. That is why so many of us use the plural pronoun, they, as a gender-neutral substitute.

Which is better? A. Ask each of the children what they want for a snack. B. Ask each of the children what she or he wants for a snack."*

To the consternation of the grammar purists, choice A is becoming the accepted norm. The Washington Post in its 2015 style guide recognized the use of they as an acceptable gender-neutral pronoun. In 2016 the American Dialect Society chose this particular use of they as the "word of the year."And as the Mirriam-Webster Dictionary points out, this usage has been around since the 1300s. In 1881 our quite proper Emily Dickinson was availing herself of this usage.

On the other hand, The stodgy Modern Language Association is somewhat reluctant to give its imprimatur. And as you would suspect, "The Gray Lady" (NYT) is ambivalent about such usage. Its style guide permits the usage if the individual so desires, but warns about the dangers of using it too frequently.

The bottom line is this usage has been around since the 1300s and is not going away. The purists need to move on to another battle. This one has been lost. And, like Farhad Manjoo, writing in the NYT observes, not only does this usage solve a problem, it is "inclusive and flexible."

Of course, everybody is entitled to their (her or his) own opinion.

* Farhad Monjoo in the NYT writes that the phrase, "he or she," is the "clunkiest phrase ever concocted by small-minded grammarians."

The Testaments - Atwood Reveals Gilead's Future

2019-09-28T08:50:00.001-04:00

I know you haven't asked, but it is my opinion that some iconic novels should never have sequels. Just a few examples are The Great Gatsby, 1984, Gone with the Wind, The Grapes of Wrath, and To Kill a Mockingbird (the attempted sequel proves my point).

Thus it was with a great deal of skepticism that I began reading Margaret Atwood's sequel to The Handmaid's Tale.

From the TV Series

As with the dystopian original, the sequel, The Testaments, is set in Gilead, a totalitarian theocracy that has replaced the United States of America. Although fifteen years have passed, the Republic of Gilead has survived, only more corrupt than ever. Women are still treated as "two-legged wombs," a distorted form of Christian fundamentalism is used to justify discrimination and the elimination of human rights. The abusive, totalitarian Republic of Gilead demonstrates the dangers of not maintaining a wall of separation between religion and government. For example, Gilead uses religion and a redacted bible to eliminate nonwhites and so-called unbelievers (Jews, Catholics, and anyone who does not adhere to their extreme dogmas).

The Testaments, unlike the original, tends to be a spy thriller, which in the hands of a storyteller like Margaret Atwood captures the reader's attention and does not let go. The "testaments" in the sequel are those of Agnes Jemima, a Commander's adopted daughter; Nicole, a sixteen-year-old in Canada under a different name; and Aunt Lydia, the most powerful woman in Gilead. The three characters tell their stories from their own particular point of view with the result that the reader slowly becomes aware of the total story.

Agnes grew up in Gilead and wants and prays to be a true believer, but the abusive behavior of the leaders force her to question her faith. At one point she writes: "Still I wanted to believe; indeed, I longed to; and, in the end, how much of belief comes from longing."

Nicole, a sixteen-year-old refugee from Gilead and living in Canada under a different name slowly becomes aware of her true identity; and, after the murders of her step-parents agrees to infiltrate Gilead and bring back damning evidence of Gilead's corruption.

Aunt Lydia, recognized as a "founder" of Gilead leads a double life as an enforcer of the extreme doctrine and a resistance fighter hoping to bring about the collapse of Gilead.

Although Atwood does not dwell on the inhumane, abusive crimes of Gilead or make predictions, the attitudes and temperament of that society have a frightening resemblance to the post-2016 cultural changes taking place in this country. And, perhaps, that accounts for the success of Hulu's TV version of "The Handmaid's Tale," now in season three.

Unlike some other dystopian novels, Atwood makes a point of not including anything "that had not already happened" at some time in history. One can readily recall theocracies engaging the same inhumane techniques as we find in Gilead. And to her credit, she does not create new technologies. She uses nothing that is "not already available."

In short, Atwood has created a solid stand-alone sequel that recounts the story of three women whose "testaments" challenge a cruel regime that tries to silence and denigrate women.

Tennis Has a Problem - Medical Time-outs

2019-09-01T13:56:00.000-04:00

Now that the US Open tennis tournament is in full swing and "Coco Mania" is a thing, many casual observers are watching some or many televised matches, and I suspect some are wondering about the so-called "medical time-out."

Maria Sharapova in a medical time-out

As far as I can determine, this phenomenon is unique to tennis. The usual scenario is that a player indicates to the umpire that a trainer/doctor is needed. When the trainer/doctor arrives he attempts to evaluate the player's physical problem. Many times, I suspect, the problem is mental or emotional. This evaluation process can take as long as the trainer/doctor chooses. It is only after the evaluation is declared complete that the umpire starts to time the treatment--presumably three minutes. And eventually, the match resumes.

This process, I am convinced is absurd and unfair.*

In what other sport, individual or team, is an injured player allowed to stop the action, receive medical treatment and then return? When Tiger Woods broke a bone in his leg, he had to continue to play in a debilitating condition or withdraw from the tournament. A boxer cannot delay a bout because of shoulder pain. A triathlete cannot request a time-out to receive treatment for the blisters on her feet.

In team sports, an injured athlete has to continue to play or be immediately replaced by a substitute. Of course, in the case of baseball, the pace of play is so slow that fans would not even notice a medical time-out.

The most obvious problem with tennis' medical break is that it can be used by a player to break an opponent's momentum. Without mentioning names, there are some players who are notorious for this. When their opponent starts to make a run and turn the match around, the player calls for a trainer/doctor, and complains of a vague injury or is simply seeking a massage with lidocaine. The result is a five to fifteen-minute break which interrupts the match while the opponent who had the momentum has to sit and wait. Gamesmanship such as this should not be allowed.

If a player can't continue to play in the allotted time, that player should forfeit gracefully. If the so-called injury does not preclude playing, the player should be back on the court in the allotted time.

On the other hand, since some matches, especially men's matches, can last four or more hours, players should be allowed to take a bathroom break between sets.

* Although my qualifications to suggest this may be challenged, I am a fan, a player, and a former USTA official, referee, and tournament director.

Age of Information is also Age of Disinformation

2019-07-27T13:40:00.001-04:00

We are living in the age of information. Never before have people all over the world had access to so much information. Today we, unlike our ancestors, do not have to travel to the great universities, libraries, and museums of the world to access arcane and obscure information. We just "google it." The world of information is a few computer clicks away. What a great time to be alive.

Data appears to be the gold standard these days. As just one example, data drives sports whether professional or junior varsity. NFL players consult their laptops on the sidelines. MLB, always a data greedy sport, uses almost instant data to analyze every aspect of the game. Back in the day, managers would shift their infields based on a hunch. Today infield shifts are much more prevalent because the manager possesses precise and up-to-date data on each opposing player.

Watching a professional golf tournament on TV is frequently like being in a physics classroom. In addition to the data golfers often referred to ( distances, speed of greens, number of birdies on a particular hole), today's TV viewers know the angle of impact, clubhead speed, trajectory, and distance traveled. All of this almost immediately after the swing.

Unfortunately, the same technology that provides all of this instant information is also being used to spread disinformation.

Back in the day, we would receive detailed information from newspapers which appeared on our doorsteps once a day. We would receive more up-to-date, albeit brief summaries on the radio, and then in the evening, we were able to watch a fifteen-minute TV account of the world and national news. These news sources were held to a standard of truth and fairness. Readers, listeners, and viewers could be reasonably certain of the facts reported. (Of course, even in those days, the question of what to report or not to report was a concern.)

False on so many levels, but repeated by many.

Today, almost anyone with a computer can publish whatever information they choose, and therein lies the problem. Anyone can fabricate a story and throw it out into cyberspace and there will be some who believe it, no matter how absurd because it plays to their fears and reinforces their prejudices. In the 2016 presidential election, fanciful, undocumented stories were everywhere on the internet, and many readers/viewers believed them and reposted them on Facebook or Twitter.

And then there are the bots--algorithms designed to send out millions of misleading or false stories. Most recently, Russian bots bombarded US internet users with seemingly scientific information about the evils of the MMR vaccinations. The resulting confusion prevented parents from vaccinating their children, and then the US experienced an unnecessary number of cases of measles.

On the one hand, the Age of Information is the best of worlds in that it allows everyone a voice and makes unlimited amounts of information available to all. The great democratizer. On the other hand, it is the worst of worlds in that it allows almost anyone to spread lies or recruit suicide bombers.

So what's a person to do in this new age?

The rules of navigating this new arena are quite obvious, but a bit cumbersome.

Check the source. If the source of an anti-vax article is an institution that no one has ever heard of, it's probably bogus, but one can always use independent fact-checking sites. The top fact-checking sites are FactCheck.org, Politifact.com, FactChecker.com (Washinton Post), Snopes.com. Images as well can be misleading, and TinEye.com will trace the origin of a particular photograph.

Depend on established news organizations whose reputations depend on getting the story right the first time. NPR, ABC, CBS, or NBC are run by real journalists who get the story corroborated by several sources before publishing it.

Triangulate. If the story is from an unfamiliar source, check to find it in the New York Times, The Hill*, Politico, Axios or other mainstream sources. If you have three respected sources agreeing, the fundamentals of the story are most likely accurate.

Facebook etc. channel information to you based on what you read and send to friends. Therefore one should view items from sources other than those catering to your point of view. You will then be exposed to uncomfortable information with the result that you have to give the issue some serious thought.

Share judiciously. If a news item seems sensational or extreme, don't share it; it's probably not true. Recall those people who shared the false article about Pope Francis endorsing Trump in 2016. You don't want to be one of those people.

Another challenge of the Information Age is that it threatens our privacy. In order to participate in the advantages of the internet, we have to expose some of our personal information. Fortunately, governments are beginning to demand that internet companies protect our private information.

The Information Age is upon us whether we like it or not. Ignoring it is not an option. We can embrace it and demand that it "do no evil,' and respect our privacy. Not easy, but necessary.

* The Hill, a conservative news organization, has a tendency to report and perpetuate conspiracy theories.

Memorial or Decoration Day

2019-05-26T11:24:00.001-04:00

Everybody loves Memorial Day. It is the traditional beginning of summer, a well-deserved three-day weekend of relaxation and leisure recreation.

But then we remember that this day is set aside to honor those who made the ultimate sacrifice for the sake of preserving our constitutional democracy.

Images of Arlington National Cemetery, the American Cemetery in Colleville-sur-Mer in Normandy, and the Vietnam Wall in Washington remind us that trying to solve problems on a battlefield destroys both the victorious and the vanquished. In the Civil War, for example, 500,000 soldiers died - 2% of the population.

Some of us who have been hanging around this planet for quite a few years will remember this day was often referred to as Decoration Day. At a Civil War memorial event at Arlington National Cemetery, General John A. Logan declared May 30 to be "Decoration Day." He said the fallen should be honored by "...strewing with flowers, or otherwise decorating, the graves of comrades who died in defense of their country..."

However, in the 20th century, especially after WWI (over 100,000 American deaths), the term. " Memorial Day," became increasingly popular in that it honored all American military fatalities, not just those of the Civil War.*

In 1971 Congress made Memorial Day an official national holiday to be celebrated on the last Monday in May.

In 2019, the last Monday of May is a good time to not only remember the fallen but remind ourselves of the indiscriminate and senseless slaughter of war.

*Veterans Day, on the other hand, pays tribute to all who have served in the military.

Is there any limit to what Trump can get away with?

2019-04-14T14:23:00.000-04:00

A constitutional democracy is in danger when elected officials choose loyalty to party or fidelity to a president over the constitution. Regrettably, the USA has reached this perilous point.

We currently have elected officials who are willing to ignore the rule of law in order to maintain the power their party enjoys; or even more frightening, they are afraid to incur the wrath of the president.

President Trump "reportedly told Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Kevin McAleenan that he would grant him a presidential pardon for breaking immigration law. Trump specifically reassured McAleenan that he can count on a pardon if he is arrested and convicted of denying lawful asylum seekers entry into the country." (Robert Reich)

Such behavior has to be an impeachable offense, but our elected officials are remaining silent. And what is worse, the media and the citizenry have become desensitized to this sort of attack on the rule of law. We have been bombarded for two years with presidential behavior no one could have predicted.

The sad fact is we have a president who has no respect for the rule of law or the constitution. Within the past few days, the President of the United States tweeted: " We have the worst laws of any country in the world." Let that sink in for a minute.

Perhaps they are the "worst laws" because Mr. Trump so frequently finds himself in conflict with them. Since Congres has requested Mr. Trump's tax returns from the Treasury Department, the Secretary, after consulting with the White House, is refusing to turn them over as required by law -- that must be one of the "worst" laws.

And lest we forget, in the early hours of his presidency Trump shared in the Oval Office secret information with Russian officials. I think there is a law against that sort of behavior.

Our elected officials cannot continue to ignore this president's attack on our country's laws.

Over and above the rule of law, our country subscribes to the rule of decency. Consider for a moment how often Mr. Trump has violated our sense of decency. At the present time, it appears that the White House, influenced by Stephen Miller, is about to reintroduce the policy of separating children from parents seeking asylum.

History has recorded the Japenese internment during World War II as a low point in our history, but at least in those days, we did not separate the children from their parents.

And finally, there is the rule of common sense. Just recently, our president has told us the wind power causes cancer, and that the US if full -- I guess in that case, the government should start dispensing birth control pills.

When will elected officials demonstrate the courage to reinstate the rule of law, the rule of decency and the rule of common sense? Hopefully, sooner rather than later.