<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Ed Balls</category><category>Honours</category><category>Former MPs</category><category>Home Office</category><category>Defence</category><category>Resignations</category><category>Alex Salmond</category><category>Terrorism</category><category>Death Penalty</category><category>Tuition Fees</category><category>Animal welfare</category><category>Beer</category><category>Alan Milburn</category><category>Coalitions</category><category>Conferences 2011</category><category>ID Cards</category><category>Labour leadership</category><category>Nuclear energy</category><category>Anthem for England</category><category>Lords Reform</category><category>Lib Dems</category><category>Jim Callaghan</category><category>Global warming</category><category>Ben Bradshaw</category><category>Peter Mandelson</category><category>David MiIiband</category><category>Spin</category><category>Police</category><category>Unemployment</category><category>Eric Pickles</category><category>Rugby</category><category>Liam Fox</category><category>Philip Hammond</category><category>Political Top 10s</category><category>Air travel</category><category>Christmas</category><category>US presidential election 2008</category><category>Neil Kinnock</category><category>Labour conference 2006</category><category>Public holidays</category><category>Budget 2011</category><category>Lib Dem Conference 2006</category><category>English Question</category><category>Nick Clegg</category><category>Ming Campbell</category><category>City regions</category><category>Coal</category><category>Andy Burnham</category><category>Immigration</category><category>Tax</category><category>Tories</category><category>Conferences 2010</category><category>Olympic Games</category><category>Liberal Conspiracy</category><category>MPs expenses</category><category>Top 10s</category><category>Labour</category><category>Snow</category><category>Alastair Darling</category><category>Housing</category><category>Telly</category><category>Manifestos 2010</category><category>Labour conference 2007</category><category>Tony Blair</category><category>NHS</category><category>Belper</category><category>The Coalition</category><category>Budget 2010</category><category>Inequality</category><category>Gordon Brown</category><category>Sport</category><category>John Prescott</category><category>Referenda</category><category>Michael Gove</category><category>Budget 2008</category><category>Nuclear weapons</category><category>Lib Dem leadership contest</category><category>London</category><category>Hung Parliaments</category><category>Margaret Thatcher</category><category>Scotland</category><category>Constitutional reform</category><category>Derbyshire</category><category>Labour sleaze</category><category>Monarchy</category><category>Interviews</category><category>Harriet Harman</category><category>Ken Clarke</category><category>Local elections</category><category>Postal strike</category><category>Boris Johnson</category><category>Sleaze</category><category>Local governnment</category><category>General Election</category><category>Happiness Agenda</category><category>Podcasting</category><category>Lobby</category><category>Stephen Byers</category><category>Tim Farron</category><category>Cartoons</category><category>Lighter side</category><category>Economy</category><category>Parliament</category><category>Political Correctness</category><category>Welfare reform</category><category>Treasury</category><category>Christianity</category><category>Big Society</category><category>Sir Menzies Campbell</category><category>War in Afghanistan</category><category>Political cross-dressing</category><category>Europe</category><category>PB.com guest blogs</category><category>Football</category><category>Review of the Year</category><category>Theresa May</category><category>BBC</category><category>Personal</category><category>Labour leadership election 2010</category><category>Alan Johnson</category><category>Journalism</category><category>Cuts</category><category>Pre-Budget Report</category><category>Crime</category><category>Fantasy Cabinets</category><category>Speakership election 2009</category><category>Greens</category><category>Ed</category><category>Hilary Armstrong</category><category>Fellwalking</category><category>Alastair Campbell</category><category>John Reid</category><category>Barnett Formula</category><category>Public spending</category><category>History</category><category>Iraq War</category><category>Stop Gordon</category><category>Blogosphere</category><category>General Election 2010</category><category>Iain Duncan Smith</category><category>Class</category><category>Top 10 Carols</category><category>David Cameron</category><category>Tributes</category><category>TV debates</category><category>World Cup</category><category>Charles Kennedy</category><category>Question Time Review</category><category>Political counterfactuals</category><category>Regional government</category><category>Drugs</category><category>Fixed term Parliaments</category><category>Electoral reform</category><category>Wales</category><category>Disloyalty</category><category>Chris Huhne</category><category>By-elections</category><category>Summer Riots</category><category>Queen's Speeches</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Budget 2009</category><category>Movies</category><category>Education</category><category>Polls</category><category>North-South Divide</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Reshuffles</category><category>Total politics</category><category>North-East</category><category>Family</category><category>Conferences 2009</category><category>Cricket</category><category>David Davis</category><category>David Kelly Affair</category><category>George Osborne</category><category>Conferences 2008</category><category>Tory Conference 2007</category><category>Weather</category><category>Smoking</category><category>Alcohol</category><category>Racism</category><category>Yvette Cooper</category><category>Political Gaffes</category><category>Predictions</category><category>Music</category><category>Ed Miliband</category><category>Lib Dem leadership contest 2007</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>BNP</category><category>International politics</category><category>Vince Cable</category><category>David Blunkett</category><category>Tory Conference 2006</category><category>BlogGems</category><category>Tory leadership</category><category>Transport</category><category>Deputy leadership</category><category>Books</category><title>Paul Linford</title><description>Political Commentary and Other Stuff</description><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1221</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/cPBR" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="blogspot/cpbr" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-803541809004230229</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-28T08:04:00.695Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The Coalition</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Iraq War</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Welfare reform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tony Blair</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Christianity</category><title>On this issue, it's the bishops who are out of touch</title><atom:summary>Religion and politics have always been a potentially lethal combination.  It is way too simplistic to say they don’t mix.  Actually the problems usually arise from the fact that they tend to mix only too well.

The question is not so much whether they do mix, but whether they should mix, such is the potential for rival politicians to extract wildly differing interpretations from the same </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2012/01/on-this-issue-its-bishops-who-are-out.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-8092732821338901173</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-21T08:56:00.048Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Miliband</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Jim Callaghan</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tony Blair</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">History</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Neil Kinnock</category><title>Too late for Ed to change the public's minds</title><atom:summary>So was it a political masterstroke as some pundits argued, or was it the beginning of the end of his leadership of the Labour Party – as two of the union barons who originally backed him for the job have claimed?

Opinions were certainly divided this week about Ed Miliband’s decision to come out in support of the coalition government’s pay freeze.

For Len McCluskey of Unite and Paul Kenny of the</atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2012/01/too-late-for-ed-to-change-publics-minds.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-2821464991162073509</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-14T08:52:00.533Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Scotland</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Regional government</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">North-East</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Alex Salmond</category><title>Scottish independence won't be the end of the devolution 'process'</title><atom:summary>Back in 1998, a now almost-forgotten former Labour cabinet minister coined the phrase:  "Devolution is a process, not an event."

They were in fact the words of Ron Davies, the architect of the Welsh Assembly who is now primarily remembered for his 'moment of madness' on Clapham Common and subsequent 'badger-watching' escapades near the M4.

But as the repercussions of New Labour's devolution </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2012/01/scottish-independence-wont-be-end-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>5</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-995283253977649226</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-07T09:08:00.563Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Miliband</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Yvette Cooper</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Balls</category><title>Time for Labour to turn to its own 'Iron Lady?'</title><atom:summary>And so the new political year begins moreorless exactly where the old one left off…with Labour leader Ed Miliband’s long-term survival prospects once more being called into question.

The run-up to Christmas saw growing unease in Labour ranks over Mr Miliband’s failure to make more headway against David Cameron’s Coalition government, in what seemed like the beginnings of a whispering campaign.

</atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2012/01/time-for-labour-to-turn-to-its-own-iron.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-7640500195248199524</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-01T17:25:59.513Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Miliband</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The Coalition</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Europe</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Predictions</category><title>If you want to see the future of politics, just listen to 'God'</title><atom:summary>Following on from last week's Review of 2011, here's my look ahead to the political year 2012.


Predicting the future is always a risky business,  but anyone looking for some pointers as to the direction which British politics might take over the next few years could do worse than listen to ‘God.’

Of course, by that I don’t mean him upstairs – though doubtless he might also have something to </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2012/01/if-you-want-to-see-future-of-politics.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-4352990364253231303</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-24T07:31:35.482Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">George Osborne</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Miliband</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The Coalition</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Electoral reform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Economy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Rupert Murdoch</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Nick Clegg</category><title>Review of the Year 2011</title><atom:summary>Ever since the formation of the Coalition between David Cameron’s Conservatives and Nick Clegg’s Liberal Democrats in the aftermath of the May 2010 general election, British politics has by and large been dominated by two interrelated questions.

The first was whether, in spite of the obvious chemistry between the two leaders, an alliance between two parties with such vastly differing worldviews </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/12/review-of-year-2011.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-3344685359295056223</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-19T14:50:34.919Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Europe</category><title>On the big issues, is Cameron actually a worse PM than Brown?</title><atom:summary>A few weeks ago, a backbench Conservative MP got himself into a spot of bother after being caught on tape using a four-letter word to describe his leader David Cameron.

Given that the offending word used by backbencher Patrick Mercer began with an ‘a’ rather a ‘c’, the implication was not so much that he finds the Prime Minister personally unpleasant as that he regards him as a bit of a clown.

</atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/12/on-big-issues-is-cameron-actually-worse.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-534761481128568644</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 08:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-03T08:35:00.738Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">George Osborne</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Economy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Balls</category><title>A large slice of humble pie for Osborne - but was it really a game changer?</title><atom:summary>An extra £111bn of borrowing over the next five years.  A fresh squeeze on public spending.  No prospect of any tax cuts before the next general election.

It is easy to see why many commentators have described Tuesday’s Autumn Statement by Chancellor George Osborne as a ‘game changer’ in British politics.

Here we have a government that was elected in order to sort out the nation’s finances and </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/12/large-slice-of-humble-pie-for-osborne.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-3218096978214423138</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-11-26T08:30:01.019Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">George Osborne</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Miliband</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The Coalition</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Economy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Nick Clegg</category><title>Osborne's date with political destiny</title><atom:summary>‘Make or break’ is doubtless an overused term in politics.  Many are the times when it is said that a politician needs to make the “speech of his life” on such and such a day, only for the same old cliché to be trotted out again the next time he makes one.

Yet for Chancellor George Osborne, this Tuesday’s autumn statement on the economy is genuinely shaping up to be one of those dates with </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/11/osbornes-date-with-political-destiny.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-4679405278790631206</guid><pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-11-19T08:31:00.456Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">George Osborne</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Miliband</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">North-South Divide</category><title>Lost North jobs still seen as a 'price worth paying'</title><atom:summary>Youth unemployment topping 1m.   An additional 129,000 people out of work in the past month.  The overall number of jobless at its highest level since 1994.   This week’s unemployment figures told their own story.

If people were not already sufficiently well-appraised of the dire state of the British economy, Wednesday’s figures, coupled with more downbeat forecasts from the governor of the Bank</atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/11/lost-north-jobs-still-seen-as-price.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-5726385896814746626</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-11-12T21:47:50.276Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Theresa May</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Home Office</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">History</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Alan Johnson</category><title>Theresa May faces long-drawn-out demise</title><atom:summary>To kick off this week’s column, here are a couple of questions for political anoraks with long memories or people who were paying attention in school history lessons.  

Number One:   Who was the last British politician to move directly from the office of Secretary of State for the Home Department to that of First Lord of Treasury and Prime Minister?   

Number Two:  What do Reginald Maudling, </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/11/theresa-may-faces-long-drawn-out-demise.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-3269506871643964048</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-11-05T08:37:00.539Z</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Europe</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Balls</category><title>Cameron could lose big as Balls makes mischief</title><atom:summary>The week before last, 81 Conservative MPs ignored the blandishments of the party whips, and the pleas of Prime Minister David Cameron, to demand a referendum on EU membership.

It was the biggest rebellion of Mr Cameron's six years as party leader, but with Labour also supporting the government, it was far from being the tightest parliamentary vote since the Coalition took power.

For that, you </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/11/cameron-could-lose-big-as-balls-makes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-592386385213430698</guid><pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:16:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-10-22T08:16:00.564+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Liam Fox</category><title>Victory strengthens Cameron's hand against rebellious party</title><atom:summary>Of all the many factors that determine political success and failure, there can be no doubt that luck features pretty high on the list.

David Cameron has always been a lucky politician.  He had the good luck to be elected to the Tory leadership at just the point when people were starting to tire of New Labour, and the good luck to be battling for power against Gordon Brown rather than Tony Blair</atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/10/victory-strengthens-camerons-hand.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-4856444372268792171</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-10-15T08:26:00.359+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Liam Fox</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Miliband</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Philip Hammond</category><title>A tale of two reshuffles</title><atom:summary>A couple of months back, I wrote a column highlighting the absence this year of one of the hitherto regular features of the political scene – the summer Cabinet reshuffle.

Partly this could be attributed to David Cameron’s hatred of them.   He had made clear he saw no purpose in shifting ministers around every 12 months, and wanted his team to stay in place for the duration of the five-year </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/10/tale-of-two-reshuffles.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-8492618152798842438</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 07:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-10-08T08:56:00.130+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">George Osborne</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Happiness Agenda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conferences 2011</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tory leadership</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Boris Johnson</category><title>Cameron's glass may be half-full - but the policy cupboard remains half-empty</title><atom:summary>It is generally true to say that in order to be successful in politics, you have to be capable of conveying a sense of optimism about your country and its future.

One of Tony Blair's key strengths at the start of his leadership was his ability to communicate a vision of a bright 'New Britain' in contrast to the greyness of the John Major years.

Later, David Cameron donned the same mantle, </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/10/camerons-glass-may-be-half-full-but.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-8593017392524717218</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 07:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-10-01T08:41:00.380+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Miliband</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Labour</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conferences 2011</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tony Blair</category><title>Miliband shows the extent of his boldness, but the reaction shows the extent of his task</title><atom:summary>Of all the many soundbites devised by Tony Blair’s speechwriters for their leader’s party conference speeches, among the most irritating was the claim that New Labour was “at its best when at its boldest.”

If New Labour had ever done anything remotely bold, it might have had more of a ring of truth about it, but all it ever really did was to maintain and entrench the political and economic </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/10/miliband-shows-extent-of-his-boldness.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-6844889926779196117</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-24T08:54:00.047+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">George Osborne</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Nick Clegg</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tim Farron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conferences 2011</category><title>At some point, Clegg will have to start thinking about the next election, not the last</title><atom:summary>If one sign of a good politician is the ability to learn from the greats that have gone before you, then Nick Clegg certainly hit the mark in at least one respect this week.

“You don't play politics at a time of national crisis, you don't play politics with the economy, and you never, ever, play politics with people's jobs," the Liberal Democrat leader told his party conference in Birmingham on </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/09/at-some-point-clegg-will-have-to-start.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-1845015088549376292</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-17T08:21:00.782+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Regional government</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">North-East</category><title>Could boundary review put regional governance back on agenda?</title><atom:summary>Over the course of the long debate about North-East regional governance, one of the most oft-heard arguments was that the region lacked the clout to make its voice heard at Westminster.

Well, if that was true then, when the region sent 30 MPs to the Commons, it will be even more the case after the next election when its representation will fall to just 26.

This week’s review of the </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/09/could-boundary-review-put-regional.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-4958209321940455304</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-11T08:10:09.194+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Terrorism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tony Blair</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">History</category><title>The glorious failure of Tony Blair</title><atom:summary>Over the course of the years in which I reported on political conferences for The Journal, I listened to a fair few party leader’s speeches, some of them good, some of them almost embarrassingly bad.

Of the latter category, the one that most stands out is Iain Duncan Smith’s “The Quiet Man is turning up the volume” fiasco from 2003, closely followed by John Major’s solemn 1995 pledge to increase</atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/09/glorious-failure-of-tony-blair.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-3842018139162629809</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-27T08:55:00.538+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Summer Riots</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tony Blair</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Blunkett</category><title>Whatever became of the August Silly Season?</title><atom:summary>In my last Saturday column three weeks ago, I highlighted the absence this year of what has hitherto been an almost annual feature of the summer political scene – the July Cabinet Reshuffle.

But as it turned out, that has not been the only thing missing from this strangest of summers.  What on earth, I ask you, has happened to that other great British political tradition - the August Silly </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/08/whatever-became-of-august-silly-season.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-6775159144520210467</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-06T08:57:00.567+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Reshuffles</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tony Blair</category><title>What was missing about the political summer of 2011?</title><atom:summary>As anyone who has ever worked at Westminster for any length of time will know, there are certain fixed points in the parliamentary calendar which do much to shape the narrative of the political year.

Some of these are pretty well immovable feasts:  the Budget, for instance, is almost always in March, the local elections in May, the party conferences in the autumn and the Queen's Speech in </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/08/what-was-missing-about-political-summer.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-8403063286388086094</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-01T14:19:12.172+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">George Osborne</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Rupert Murdoch</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Public holidays</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Boris Johnson</category><title>Meanwhile, back in the real world....</title><atom:summary>Once again, the week concludes with phone-hacking back at the top of the political agenda, as MPs discuss a possible fresh grilling for News International's James Murdoch amid more conflicting tales about who knew what and when.

Sure, it's all very entertaining, especially for those of us who have spent years longing to see the Murdoch Empire cut down to size, and in view of his long-standing </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/08/meanwhile-back-in-real-world.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-2550101172779507374</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 07:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-26T11:36:59.166+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Miliband</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Nick Clegg</category><title>Why Cameron is not out of the woods yet</title><atom:summary>Ever since the start of the crisis over phone hacking that has engulfed the worlds of politics, journalism and the police over the past three weeks, Prime Minister David Cameron had appeared to be stuck on the back foot.

Much as he himself once managed to make Gordon Brown seem leaden-footed in his response to the MPs' expenses crisis two years ago, Labour leader Ed Miliband had seemed to be </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/07/why-cameron-is-not-out-of-woods-yet.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-8753247629287207922</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-16T09:39:21.773+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Cameron</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ed Miliband</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Journalism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Rupert Murdoch</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Nick Clegg</category><title>Murdoch's power has been broken.  Could Cameron's be next?</title><atom:summary>For the past thirty years, the British political establishment has been in thrall to Rupert Murdoch - the 24th member of Tony Blair's Cabinet as he was once dubbed.

In the course of that period, his media empire has variously decided the outcome of elections, dictated the membership of Cabinets, shaped policies on a wide range of issues and even influenced whether or not the country went to war.</atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/07/murdochs-power-has-been-broken-could.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-1170325703942916674</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-14T17:02:45.780+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Liberal Conspiracy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Personal</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Blogosphere</category><title>Me, this blog, and Dale and Co</title><atom:summary>I started this blog in 2005 with no great ambitions for it other than to provide an outlet for my political writing which, at that time, was not afforded to me by my 'day job.'

I had left the parliamentary lobby the year before in order to pursue a different line of work and enjoy a better quality of life, and although I did not miss the lobby as such, I did miss being able to sound-off about </atom:summary><link>http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2011/07/me-this-blog-and-dale-and-co.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul Linford)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item></channel></rss>

