<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.science20.com/">
  <channel>
    <title>Latest by Author</title>
    <link>https://www.science20.com/</link>
    <description/>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
  <title>Melville on Science vs. Creation Myth</title>
  <link>https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity/blog/melville_science_vs_creation_myth-76265</link>
  <description>&lt;span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden"&gt;Melville on Science vs. Creation Myth&lt;/span&gt;

            &lt;div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;From Melville's under-appreciated Mardi:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a quest for his missing love Yillah, an AWOL sailor pretending to be a demi-god travels the (imaginary) Mardi chain of Polynesian islands via canoe fleet, in the company of fellow demi-god King Media and his entourage.  After viewing some fossils, the group's resident philosopher, Babbalanja is asked how the islands were created. A  scientific explanation being unsatisfactory to the group, Babbalanja presents an alternate hypothesis:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Media said:—"Babbalanja, you love all mysteries; here's a fitting theme. You have given us the history of the rock; can your sapience tell the origin of all the isles? how Mardi came to be?"&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity" class="username"&gt;Michael White&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;time datetime="2011-02-14T07:47:51-05:00" title="Monday, February 14, 2011 - 07:47" class="datetime"&gt;Mon, 02/14/2011 - 07:47&lt;/time&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class="field field--name-field-blog-categories field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix"&gt;
    &lt;div class="field__label"&gt;Categories&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class="field__item"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.science20.com/humor" hreflang="en"&gt;Humor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
          &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">66548 at https://www.science20.com</guid>
    </item>
<item>
  <title>Non-coding DNA Function... Surprising?</title>
  <link>https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity/noncoding_dna_function_surprising-76121</link>
  <description>&lt;span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden"&gt;Non-coding DNA Function... Surprising?&lt;/span&gt;

            &lt;div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The existence of functional, non-protein-coding DNA is all too frequently portrayed as a great surprise uncovered by genome sequencing projects, both in large media outlets and in scientific publications that should have better quality control in place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eric Lander, writing a Human Genome Project 10th anniversary retrospective in Nature, explains the real surprise about non-coding DNA that was revealed by big omics projects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity" class="username"&gt;Michael White&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;time datetime="2011-02-10T11:51:12-05:00" title="Thursday, February 10, 2011 - 11:51" class="datetime"&gt;Thu, 02/10/2011 - 11:51&lt;/time&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class="field field--name-field-blog-categories field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix"&gt;
    &lt;div class="field__label"&gt;Categories&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class="field__item"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.science20.com/genetics_molecular_biology" hreflang="en"&gt;Genetics &amp;amp; Molecular Biology&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
          &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">24395 at https://www.science20.com</guid>
    </item>
<item>
  <title>Yep, This Should Get You Fired</title>
  <link>https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity/yep_should_get_you_fired-75360</link>
  <description>&lt;span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden"&gt;Yep, This Should Get You Fired&lt;/span&gt;

            &lt;div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;An Ohio 8th-grade creationist science teacher with a habit of branding crosses on his students' arms has been fired, after a long and tedious process and a lawsuit that cost the school district some big bucks.The referee who evaluated the case for termination nicely summed up in one sentence (PDF) exactly what you can't do when you're a public school science teacher: ...He persisted in his attempts to make eighth grade science what he thought it should be - an examination of accepted scientific curriculum with the discerning eye of Christian Doctrine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity" class="username"&gt;Michael White&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;time datetime="2011-01-14T07:41:25-05:00" title="Friday, January 14, 2011 - 07:41" class="datetime"&gt;Fri, 01/14/2011 - 07:41&lt;/time&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class="field field--name-field-blog-categories field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix"&gt;
    &lt;div class="field__label"&gt;Categories&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class="field__item"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.science20.com/science_education_policy" hreflang="en"&gt;Science Education &amp;amp; Policy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
          &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">24184 at https://www.science20.com</guid>
    </item>
<item>
  <title>No, There Are No Alien Bar Codes In Our Genomes</title>
  <link>https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity/no_there_are_no_alien_bar_codes_our_genomes</link>
  <description>&lt;span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden"&gt;No, There Are No Alien Bar Codes In Our Genomes&lt;/span&gt;

            &lt;div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even for a physicist, this is bad:  Larry Moran, in preparation for the appropriate dose of ridicule that this situation deserves, quotes physicist and pop-science author Paul Davies:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another physical object with enormous longevity is DNA. Our bodies contain some genes that have remained little changed in 100 million years. An alien expedition to Earth might have used biotechnology to assist with mineral processing, agriculture or environmental projects. If they modified the genomes of some terrestrial organisms for this purpose, or created their own micro-organisms from scratch, the legacy of this tampering might endure to this day, hidden in the biological record.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity" class="username"&gt;Michael White&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;time datetime="2011-01-12T08:23:08-05:00" title="Wednesday, January 12, 2011 - 08:23" class="datetime"&gt;Wed, 01/12/2011 - 08:23&lt;/time&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class="field field--name-field-blog-categories field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix"&gt;
    &lt;div class="field__label"&gt;Categories&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class="field__item"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.science20.com/evolution" hreflang="en"&gt;Evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
          &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">24132 at https://www.science20.com</guid>
    </item>
<item>
  <title>Politics Matters...</title>
  <link>https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity/politics_matters</link>
  <description>&lt;span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden"&gt;Politics Matters...&lt;/span&gt;

            &lt;div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;... as depressing as that may be to hear.  Some friends recently described their December trip to India, the first time they've visited in years. India's economy is on fire, unleashing some tremendous pent-up economic demand. What was striking, my friends related, was how strongly India's economic development is geared toward the future, towards not only catching up with wealthier, more developed nations, but also towards anticipating and meeting economic challenges that loom in the future. This is in stark contrast to the US, which seems, at best, focused on defending the status quo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity" class="username"&gt;Michael White&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;time datetime="2011-01-11T10:18:52-05:00" title="Tuesday, January 11, 2011 - 10:18" class="datetime"&gt;Tue, 01/11/2011 - 10:18&lt;/time&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class="field field--name-field-blog-categories field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix"&gt;
    &lt;div class="field__label"&gt;Categories&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class="field__item"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.science20.com/science_society" hreflang="en"&gt;Science &amp;amp; Society&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
          &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">24033 at https://www.science20.com</guid>
    </item>
<item>
  <title>Scientific Method In Decline?</title>
  <link>https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity/scientific_method_decline</link>
  <description>&lt;span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden"&gt;Scientific Method In Decline?&lt;/span&gt;

            &lt;div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jonah Lehrer in The New Yorker about the slipperiness of the scientific method:"The Truth Wears Off: Is There Something Wrong With The Scientific Method?"The test of replicability, as it’s known, is the foundation of modern research. Replicability is how the community enforces itself. It’s a safeguard for the creep of subjectivity. Most of the time, scientists know what results they want, and that can influence the results they get. The premise of replicability is that the scientific community can correct for these flaws.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity" class="username"&gt;Michael White&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;time datetime="2010-12-29T09:03:00-05:00" title="Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - 09:03" class="datetime"&gt;Wed, 12/29/2010 - 09:03&lt;/time&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class="field field--name-field-blog-categories field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix"&gt;
    &lt;div class="field__label"&gt;Categories&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class="field__item"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.science20.com/science_society" hreflang="en"&gt;Science &amp;amp; Society&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
          &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">46394 at https://www.science20.com</guid>
    </item>
<item>
  <title>Airport Body Scanner Won't Give You Cancer</title>
  <link>https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity/airport_body_scanner_wont_give_you_cancer</link>
  <description>&lt;span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden"&gt;Airport Body Scanner Won't Give You Cancer&lt;/span&gt;

            &lt;div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the big holidays just around the corner, thousands of folks are about to get their first taste of the TSA's new virtual strip search machines - X-ray body scanners. Privacy issues may be the main concern for most people, but the safety of these things has some people worried.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity" class="username"&gt;Michael White&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;time datetime="2010-11-19T05:50:54-05:00" title="Friday, November 19, 2010 - 05:50" class="datetime"&gt;Fri, 11/19/2010 - 05:50&lt;/time&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class="field field--name-field-blog-categories field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix"&gt;
    &lt;div class="field__label"&gt;Categories&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class="field__item"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.science20.com/public_health" hreflang="en"&gt;Public Health&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
          &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">45471 at https://www.science20.com</guid>
    </item>
<item>
  <title>Apocalypse 1955: Growing Up Telepathic</title>
  <link>https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity/apocalypse_1955_growing_telepathic</link>
  <description>&lt;span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden"&gt;Apocalypse 1955: Growing Up Telepathic&lt;/span&gt;

            &lt;div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;“What we’ve got here is a failure to communicate.”The much-revered writers of the Golden Age of science fiction can be quite rough around the edges, even downright embarrassing on occasion. The writing is hurried, the plots of plot-driven books are disturbingly inconsistent, and the characters are primarily stock types and authorial mouthpieces. To top it off, many of these novels are ambitious, earnestly offered as novels of big ideas. These ideas are usually sympathetic (tolerance, freedom, racial equality, escape from religious tyranny), but generally reduced to platitudes expressed in long, somnolent sermons by the your standard pointy-headed philosopher-scientist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity" class="username"&gt;Michael White&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;time datetime="2010-11-12T10:26:59-05:00" title="Friday, November 12, 2010 - 10:26" class="datetime"&gt;Fri, 11/12/2010 - 10:26&lt;/time&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class="field field--name-field-blog-categories field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix"&gt;
    &lt;div class="field__label"&gt;Categories&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class="field__item"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.science20.com/science_society" hreflang="en"&gt;Science &amp;amp; Society&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
          &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">45438 at https://www.science20.com</guid>
    </item>
<item>
  <title>Science Is Not Baseball - Almost Everyone's A Winner, Sort Of</title>
  <link>https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity/science_not_baseball_almost_everyones_winner_sort</link>
  <description>&lt;span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden"&gt;Science Is Not Baseball - Almost Everyone's A Winner, Sort Of&lt;/span&gt;

            &lt;div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like Nicholas Wade, and think that his latest NY Times piece on basic research is worth reading. However, I take issue with his overly simplistic characterization of how research works:Basic research, the attempt to understand the fundamental principles of science, is so risky, in fact, that only the federal government is willing to keep pouring money into it. It is a venture that produces far fewer hits than misses....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity" class="username"&gt;Michael White&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;time datetime="2010-11-08T12:45:47-05:00" title="Monday, November 8, 2010 - 12:45" class="datetime"&gt;Mon, 11/08/2010 - 12:45&lt;/time&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class="field field--name-field-blog-categories field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix"&gt;
    &lt;div class="field__label"&gt;Categories&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class="field__item"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.science20.com/science_society" hreflang="en"&gt;Science &amp;amp; Society&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
          &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">45316 at https://www.science20.com</guid>
    </item>
<item>
  <title>Why stick with QWERTY when the keyboard is virtual?</title>
  <link>https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity/blog/why_stick_qwerty_when_keyboard_virtual</link>
  <description>&lt;span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden"&gt;Why stick with QWERTY when the keyboard is virtual?&lt;/span&gt;

            &lt;div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;With virtual keyboards so common, it's should be easy for alternative, more efficient keyboard layouts to make headway, since, as we've all heard, the default QWERTY layout was designed to slow typists down.  So why aren't more devices (or at least the iPhone) giving you options, like the Dvorak layout?  From the Hartford Advocate:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you consider all of the ways that technology has changed, even in the past four or five years, it seems strange that the majority of us continue to use something as outmoded and inefficiently designed as the QWERTY keyboard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.science20.com/adaptive_complexity" class="username"&gt;Michael White&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden"&gt;&lt;time datetime="2010-10-27T04:44:55-04:00" title="Wednesday, October 27, 2010 - 04:44" class="datetime"&gt;Wed, 10/27/2010 - 04:44&lt;/time&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;

  &lt;div class="field field--name-field-blog-categories field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline clearfix"&gt;
    &lt;div class="field__label"&gt;Categories&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;div class="field__item"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.science20.com/technology" hreflang="en"&gt;Technology&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
          &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">66257 at https://www.science20.com</guid>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
