BloggingStocker

GT McDuffy Calling For A Stock Market Party In The New Year

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:46:00 +0000

Bringing in the New Year with some sweet words of wisdom, ye 'ol fast-fellas in NYC. It's gonna be a real party in 2012. Git yer wagons rollin'...we is heading north country. Slow rollin' and spring loadin', yes, ma'am.

Y'all remember the last time I called fer a bull run fiesta.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/117014-get-set-for-the-february-bull-run

Don't miss out on this one...

Yee-haw!

GT McDuffy

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

The 5 Most Important Stock Trading Tips You'll Ever Need To Know

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:07:00 +0000

Rather than write a book on the subject of trading stocks, I'd rather give you a 5-shot breakdown. Traders are busy people, no? Everyone knows my stock-picking record and ability to pick market trends way before the pack (often to incredible skepticism). Now you can get some insight as to how I know what I know.

So here we go:

1. Don't believe anything you read or hear. Rather, go right to "why is this company, government or person really saying what they're saying." Example. You're watching one of the finance channels and a guy working for one of the gazillion equity firms comes on and says, "we're heading into a double-dip recession." Reality: he or his firm may well be short the market and simply wants to create panic. To be a successful trader, you need to shed all things "polyana" from your upbringing and way of thinking. The markets aren't the place to see the glass "half-full." Understand that everyone lies. Just because the SEC is trying to monitor and enforce - companies, governments and investment dudes lie all the time. That would include not telling/withholding/omitting things to the public they just don't want anyone to know. Many companies know that, at ,the end of the day, even if they get busted - the fine will be pocket change. And of course, politicians (you know, the people who are supposed to be doing things to help us little people have a better life) lie for a living - and really couldn't care less if the someone loses his house or defaults on her car payments. Just as long as they get re-elected. Duh!

2. Mastering trading tip #1 allows you to pick stocks with "eyes wide open." However, what to choose? Easy. Listen for the "distant drum beat of the markets." What's that you say? When you're watching CNBC or Bloomberg or reading your favorite newspapers, finance writers etc., pretend you're living in the jungle- and you know you need to listen far into the night for that faint drumbeat in order to know what's really about to happen between the tribal leaders. In the financial markets, this is an equivalent example: the "herd" is short the market circa 2008. The markets are tanking. For months, all the talking-heads on the tube and the newspaper headlines are barking about financial armageddon. From September 2008 heading into January 2009 it seems like there's no end in sight. The herd is short everything, arrogantly so. Then you hear one of the big hedge fund guests being interviewed by yet another finance channel doomsayer host, leading the guest with stuff like, "Don't you think we're heading into another Great Depression?" He (or she) is the ten thousandth idiot to ask the same question. You can almost hear the Hans Zimmer-esque doom and gloom music playing in the background as the question is being asked. But, casually and softly, this hedge fund guy says, "you know, we're starting to close out our short positions." Of course, as 99% of the market participants, news pundits and average joe-Americas have bought into the Great Depression hype- they have become immune to what this hedge fund guy is really saying. The herd is now blinded by its own "pack-mentality" - and it barely pays the dude any mind. But, the smart trader is listening for that faint drumbeat in the distance, and is hearing instead, "Ah, the big traders are going to reverse course and go long this doom and gloom market." And, if this one large hedge fund trader is saying this on national TV- you can be sure there are quite a few more big kahunas doing the same thing. Which leads us to tip #3.

3. But everything in 2007/2008 - sub-prime fiasco, the market crash, the tanking economy, etc., - was real wasn't it? Wrong. Remember tip #1. Don't believe anything you hear or read. Believe only that, in the world of finance, multi-nationals and governments, the worst human behavior possible is always in play - regardless of how many people get hurt, collaterally. What was really going on in 2007/2008 was simply the ongoing global trading game in play; which controls the markets and world economies - manipulating everything that's "trade-able" for a profit. That would include the big banks, large private trading firms and government (sovereign) traders all over the world being deep in it all. This isn't "conspiracy theory." It's the way it is. And if you don't wake up from your little white picket fence way of thinking, you cannot become an effective trader. Now, if you want to know where the deep action is at all times- you will have to learn the derivatives markets inside out - and especially the credit default swap markets (CDS). The CDS markets will always be a barometer of who's about to stick it to who on the grand stage (and in general). You'll find yourself thinking, "Wow, they can't possibly be trying to do something as "f'd up as this." Oh yes, Virginia- they are. And they will. BTW- you will have to gauge your own morale compass here as well - as you are going to be making money off the terrible things large traders and governments do. Therefore, it's time for tip #4.

4. You cannot fight the big kahunas, nor the big game they play. So you may as well join them as they do whatever it is they do in the financial jungles of the world. Read their messages from the distant drum beats they play, and get in early on THEIR side- else you are eventually going to get crushed. Never fight them or believe you are going to beat them. Ride their wave until your start to hear another set of faint drums beginning to beat far off in the night- and start GETTING OUT of your previously profitable positions. Switch as the big guys switch, before the herd. Use the herd to your advantage- they're always the last to know.

5. Learn everything you can about short, mid and long term market-trigger events. The relationships between currency and commodity manipulation, Treasury yields, debt trading in general and import/export trade are incredibly important to staying engaged on a day-to-day basis. Don't just follow gold up because the world economies are in chaos. That's too simplistic. Sure you'll make money initially, but you may also get trapped by your own arrogance. Besides, you can double and triple your money in incredibly short periods of time by learning to trade like the big boys do, rather than make snail profits on gold. You need to understand and follow where the big kahunas park their big money - and why, and for how long - as part of the big game they play. And then, everything will make sense, On any given trading day you can then get in and out with confidence- and a profit.

Happy trading kids...and remember- you don't need to trade every day. Take a break from the ticker once in a while. Get some objectivity. Stay in tune with the markets, but don't sit at your computer like some degenerate gambler. Wait and watch and listen. And, when you spot that perfect trading storm heading your way - THEN you trade...

GT McDuffy

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

Financial Overhaul- Same Old Game, Different Day

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:35:00 +0000

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the current financial legislative overhaul is being used mainly as a tool by both sides of the Congressional aisle in order to score points with voters in the upcoming November elections.

Voters aren't being fooled, however, by the original game plan. The strategy: The Democrats would first force health care overhaul onto a huge proportion of the population that these Dems knew did not want it. Republicans would use this sad reality to "win back" seats. Then, both parties would manipulate that same angered constituency with the brilliant and noble idea of finally doing some "long-needed" financial reform. The Democrats saying: "Let's Give Main Street What We Know They'll Love So They'll Quickly Forget How Bad The Medicine Tasted By The Time They Hit The Election Ballots 6 Months From Now" (as if voters were little children who would be given some honey to sweeten the bad taste of the cough syrup). Republicans saying, "Hey, We've Been Talking About Finance Reform Long Before They Did."

Politics as usual. Nothing has changed. Nothing will ever change. Right?

Wrong.

At some point, once voters in a democratic society become truly outraged- as opposed to just simply being "very angry"- the population snaps- and revolts. How the revolt plays out is always a direct function of economic strife.

Right now, the stock market has bounced back from doom- so those 100 million Americans with money in or tied to the market are not nearly as bad off (and angry) as they would have been had the market not reversed itself a year ago. So, the revolt was held at bay- save for a small bunch of Tea Partiers.

Yet, things are really rough out there on "Main Street"- more than the government and the talking heads on TV are letting the general population know. And things are about to get a whole lot worse.

Why?

Because the Democrats have seen to it that Big Government is the only way to go- and have painted all Americans into a corner with each and every expansion into our daily lives- and at great cost to our future generations whilst putting America and the West more and more at the mercy of our foreign creditors. More mega-regulation foisted upon our large corporation "Wall Street devils" in order to placate Main Streeters may sound good in theory and at the ballot box, yet, it's not what counts.

Enforcement of existing regulations is what matters. Period. But, enforcement is not sexy. It may occasionally make for headline news- as with the SEC and Goldman Sachs (GS). Yet, in the trenches of day-to-day enforcement over long periods of time, Congress is left out of the headlines. There ARE no headlines when enforcement is working. The only way Congress gets to be included on the boob-tube is to get legislation passed (and argue needlessly about it for months and years on end)- so they can show the population they're actually doing something in the national spotlight.

If enforcement had been the key agenda over the last umpteen years- Main Street wouldn't have been in the bad place it is now. The population is being controlled, in fact, by the multi-national corporations- who simply use Congress and the White House as tools to make profit. Up until 2 years ago, as long as the population looked to blame the politicians for what was wrong when things went bad- no one blamed the multi-nationals. This isn't conspiracy theory. It's the way things really work. The only new development in the last 2 years in this usual game-theory is that the politicians are now passing the blame buck to a few choice buzzword corporations. If only because it makes voters look elsewhere- just long enough to get re-elected.

What has struck me most over the last few years is that college students haven't caught on to any of this- and have not led the charge toward changing things for the better. As they had done in the late 60's. Most likely because it was a lot easier back then to take on a bad war being paraded on the nightly news- than marching on Exxon (XOM), AIG (AIG) or Pfeizer (PFE) today. In other words- the culprits are not as obvious. Coffins draped in American flags hit directly at the core. CDO's and CDS's are some weird financial science beyond the scope of 99.9% of college students. And there you have it.

So let's start with the basics:

Regulators in (any) industry have never adequately done their jobs. If they had- things would be very different at every turn. Believe it or not- there are enough laws already on the books to stop most of the multi-nationals and large corporations in their tracks. Corporations know this- and have long learned how to control the regulators. A smart reader would now ask me the question, "Well, if the large corporations control Congress, then how did these laws get on the books in the first place." And the answer is that- it doesn't matter what the laws are- because they're hardly enforced. The big corporations have lobbying down to a science, in case Congress gets wacky about passing new "dangerous" regulation or decides that enforcement of current regulations is becoming a "problem."

But mostly, these same large corporations know that regulators eventually become lax. That once the glitter of national press coverage fades- it's business as usual. They know that regulators often leave the "regulation business" and will inevitably want to go into the private sector- and will not want to have to justify having hurt their new employers in their previous professional past-lives. Hence regulators have "looked the other way." Long enough to take a pay check- and plan their next career move to where the REAL money is.

And more than anything else- the large corporations simply pass the out-shots of actually enforced regulation- lawsuit damages and fines, etc., onto their customers in the form of higher prices and premiums for the products they sell. The corporations never lose. Only their customers lose. The current health care overhaul will, therefore, simply translate into higher costs for consumers. End of story. Tobacco companies raise the price of cigarettes every time they're sued. And the Big Banks- like Bank of America (BAC), JP Morgan (JPM), Citigroup (C), Well Fargo (WFC) etc., will "pass along" any effects of the new finance regulation package to consumers. If one thinks it's hard to get a loan or credit now- wait until Congress really squeezes the banks' trading vehicles and forces them to hold even higher capital reserves.

Liquidity is the key to banks lending. Anyone who attempts to enforce regulation on them, let alone newer regulations that hurts the liquidity industry will be quite sorry in the end- as business, and society, needs liquidity in the system in order to function in the 21st century. When the securitization market imploded in 2008, and half of the hedge funds (a big source of capital investment) evaporated quickly thereafter as the markets crashed- liquidity went AWOL.

The quick "fix-it" was to force LIBOR into play and for the central banks to use taxpayer money to put liquidity back on the table. But it was a quick fix. That's it. A "pipe-stopper." Unless the taxpayer wants to keep propping up liquidity long-term, then the private sector must be able to re-securitize and trade derived products. And let the money flow.

Unfortunately, creating and trading derivative products is a part of the process. A necessary evil. It has existed in a black box because it's so evil. Yet, opening that black box simply for the sake of transparency will only allow speculators to have that much more information as to market direction- and will cause them to pile in as they always do when they know what they didn't know before- and REALLY crank or demolish prices. If one thinks speculation is a bad thing for futures prices now- just wait until everyone knows where the action is and how it's playing out. You give the herd an inch- they're going to take a mile.

Between Ben Bernanke saving his job and Paul Volcker kicking in another "How I Saved The Economy Again" with his last foray into history- society is about to take a huge hit at their expense. They're great economic plumbers. But, they are not the architects of effective long-term change. We need financial architects now (the plumbers have done their job). However, no one comes immediately to mind. Uh-oh.

Now for the more advanced issues:

The fact that the SEC has brought charges against Goldman Sachs, and may well bring additional cases against other firms with similar charges- is actually not embracing the real issues that are far more relevant to those in enforcement. Large traders placing "bets" that a market will tank (going short) is legal- even if it's based on pure greed or that it seems completely "un-American" to do so. Longs hate shorts- but they're necessary in many markets in order to create market liquidity (which is different than credit and loan liquidity).

Going short is one thing. However, it's what these large short traders at these giant firms do on a manipulation basis that counts. No market or stock or financial product simply goes south without cause. Organically, if the markets weren't subject to manipulation practices- they'd only move according to such things as changing fundamentals along with all the other typical legitimate issues relating to companies, industries and overall economic/political factors. However, the large trading firms never "hope" things will move in a particular direction based on organic factors. Rather, they employ various manipulation techniques in order to propel and catalyze a market in a particular direction.

One such technique is for large traders to collude (directly or indirectly) and "tag team" a market downward (or upward). For example, if they want stocks or products to move downward, they will consistently pin the bids of these stocks or product market derivatives until they "cave"- then keep this downward manipulation up until a snowball effect is created amongst those who catch on to the drumbeat of process- knowing that no law yet exists against this "bid-pinning" practice. Eventually, their agenda is accomplished; crushing stocks' or derivatives' prices downward to some unbelievably low number- at which point they cover their shorts and then go long. Repeating the entire process to the upside. The public and investors have unwittingly witnessed these techniques, both short and long, as the markets played themselves out during the crash and then through the year old bull run of 2009-2010. This is how I was able to correctly predict both markets with remarkable precision. I've seen this happen again and again throughout the years.

Other manipulation techniques used (and as important) by the large firms are to simultaneously play with the spreads in related markets (and/or within the stock/product itself if they are also market makers). They will also use the television and print media as "shills" in order to create an agenda of panic.

Anything that it takes to first begin pushing the market downward (or upward), until the herd catches on and does most of the rest of the work. But, make no mistake about it: NO MANIPULATION IS LEGAL. Yet, these firms will continue to get away with it as long as no one calls them out.

Anyone naive enough to trade in the markets without knowing how this manipulation game is played is going to get hurt. Those who are hip to what is happening usually join in, not to do anything illegal, but only to be on the "right side of the trade." They'll go short with the big boys or pull their money out altogether if they don't feel comfortable going short.

Of course, those millions of passive investors with their retirement money tied to "long" products in a downward market are going to get crushed. And, this is exactly what happened during the recent crash. Yet, neither the government nor brokers forewarn clients of such impending events, which, in itself is a sad and brutal reality– and is never dealt with in D.C. It's just another incredibly important issue that the politicians are blind to until it shows up on cable TV news networks. This one hasn't shown up yet.

If I were the SEC or in Congress at this moment- I would not be simply bringing charges against those who gamed their financial products. I would be investigating, full force, what those firms and their traders did AFTER they gamed the product. In other words- did they manipulate the markets in order to reap profits. That no one in the press or in Congress has yet caught onto this is a huge relief for the firms indeed. If properly investigated by enforcement agencies, the traders would be mortified, to say the least. I'm not directly accusing anyone- however, EVERYONE who trades big money knows what I'm talking about. And they pray the day will never come when Congress and the American public open this terrible Pandora's box.

So, what are we to do? Given all of the complex issues at hand, is it all too complex to fix?

It's a twisted cycle. Damned if you do. Damned if you don't. For certain, the derivatives market is- as I said in one my articles from last year- an Ungodly place. Does it need simple regulation or unchecked transparency? Do we, as a society really want to know what's in the black box or what is behind the dark velvet derivatives curtain? We do. But we don't.

The solution is, thankfully, quite simple. The traders are going to trade. One way or the other. Whether as part of the banks. Or as spun-off divisions. What we don't need is the trading herd compounding the situation. What we DO need are true and prudent regulators- ones who are "forever independent"- non-corruptible humans who will never work in the private sector. In fact, we need them as part of a whole new branch of government- akin to the judicial branch- in that they're nominated for the long haul. And, the sole job of these regulators, separate from "enforcement," is to monitor the trading activities within the black box- behind the dark velvet curtain. Every time a new financial product is introduced, for example, it must be cleared through this branch. Every time a product is traded to the extent that the speculation of derivative prices must be weighed against the good of consumers- this branch would have to "rule" on what to do. Corporations being able to lock-in commodity prices is a good thing in order to hedge costs. However, when the trading of commodity prices is looking to go "loopy"- the profits of traders must be hedged as well- locked-in, if you will. This same branch would also be charged with independent oversight of the SEC, the FASB/FAS and the credit/product rating agencies in terms of ensuring these agencies are acting in "full faith and force"- in other words, an overseer of the overseers, charged with the final word over the enforcement branch and their activities. .

It would work. The corporations would be happy- and consumers would be happy. A win-win. I call it "econoprudence" - like jurisprudence, spelled sideways sort of.

But, it will never happen. It's too easy a solution- and is certainly as non-sexy as the judicial system. The politicians simply wouldn't have their names in the spotlight game as these new regulators actually DID something effective for society from behind closed doors.

So, I'll leave it to the college students of the world (and not the Tea Party People) to get off their asses- start educating themselves as to what is really going on out in the real world- stuff they will not see on CNN. And take things from here...

GT McDuffy

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

NAB v Musicians Royalty Dispute: Finally, A Solution Emerges

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:09:00 +0000

Most people aren't aware that the National Association Of Broadcasters (NAB) has gone to war against musicians and their record companies in order to prevent performance artists (musicians and singers- even drummers!) from being paid sound recording royalties by commercial radio stations for airplay.

The gist of it is that broadcasters feel the airplay recording artists and their record labels receive = "free promotion"- and is a sufficient form of "compensation," while musical perfomers on records spun on radio stations claim they should be paid a royalty for the privilege (irregardless of promotional value)- as songwriters of the same songs embodied in the sound recordings already receive (the latter of which are called public performance royalites which ASCAP/BMI/SESAC collect from blanket licenses, then distribute to their songwriter & music publisher-members). Musicians and singers feel that if songwriters of the songs get paid, so too should they. It's an important point- and performers do have a valid claim in my opinion. Certainly, writing a great song is very difficult- and the songwriter collects royalties in relation to each recording artist that "covers" the song that is played on a valid medium (like on radio, TV). The performer would only get paid from having performed on the particular recording of the same song. And a performance on a record should deserve equal footing with writing a song- you would think (but that's a whole other article).

However, the owners of many, if not most songs' sound recordings and their associated copyrights which actually get airplay on commercial radio stations are the record companies. When an artist signs a record contract with a record label, the artist (who can be a solo artist or a band) typically signs over (in a back-handed way) the sound recording copyrights to the label. The label then pays the artist (called a "royalty artist") a piece of the sound recording royalty pie out of incoming record sales and from digital downloads in accordance with the deal points in the record contract.

So, for example, an artist might be contractually obligated to receive, say, 12% of all record sales (simplified)- but only after the record label first deducts ("recoups") monies it has "advanced" (loaned) to the artist according a set of contractual recoupment variables- before the artist ever sees a penny. Once the record company has recouped- only then will the artist begin to receive sound recording royalties. An artist on a major label (whose records receive the majority of airplay on commercial stations) can easily end up having to pay the record company back a cool million or two before actually receiving ANY sound recording royalties. Record companies take the position that, as they are advancing most or all costs of signing an artist and making and selling the artist's records (such as for promotion and advertising)- and assume all of the risk of losing money if the artist fails- the labels deserve to get paid back off the top of incoming sales. The problem is that an artist will hit "red-line positon" (the point where they are finally due sound recording royalties), only to then have the record company apply new costs to the position- creating a seemingly endless cycle whereby by the artist doesn't really ever get to see any such royalties...unless the artist sells a gazillion records or has a ton of downloads.

Therefore, one can clearly make the case in regard to this new broadcast royalty, that the record company, as owners of the sound recording copyrights, might simply find a way to lump these new royalties into the same game- and the proposed benefactors of these new broadcast royalties will end up caught in the viscious cycle of record company payout-versus-recoupment...and other tricks.

You see, according to the Bills proposed by Congress, the "fund" is paid to the sound recording copyright owners (the labels, essentially) and are THEN to be paid to non-featured musicians and vocalists. Artists on labels would be considered to be featured performers, hence the non-featured performers are actually not the artists signed to labels, yet who perform on the recordings issued by the labels. Backround singers and session musicians. Would these people not be subject to the same recoupment schemes as the artist performers and therefore get paid "from record one" (the label pays out from the first record sold, without the non-featured performer being subject to record company advances)?

Hmmm. And how many bands on labels actually use outside musicians? Certainly, a solo artist would. Yet, given the creative ways record companies have come up with over the years to warp their accounting and audit practices, or circumvent contract terms with clever trap door clauses, etc., would a non-featured performer ever see the full amount due? Why doesn't Congress clearly stipulate in its proposed Bills that the "fund" will be paid directly to independent bodies like the AF of M (American Federation of Musicians) and AFTRA (Amercian Federation Of Television and Radio Artists)- who would then disburse these royalties directly to their members, as is the case with songwriting royaties from radio play- with ASCAP or BMI as the middlemen. As long as a record companies get their hands on the money first- there is likely to be trouble ahead.

Also important is the exact definition of a "non-featured" performer. For example, would the bass player and drummer in an act who have signed a record contract (and are, therefore, royalty artists) considered to be "non-featured" per the language of the Bills proposed? Would record companies put language in their contracts whereby all performers on their sound recordings are deemed to be "non-featured" performers- except the lead vocalist? This would be language aimed directly at garnishing the lions' share of incoming broadcast royalty revenues- and would add significantly to the label's bottom line.

Anyways, the battle between broadcasters and performers has been going on now for a few years. Sirius XM Radio (SIRI), per a 2009 settlement, already pays out an internet radio royalty. However, other than that- there are few broadcasters who are willing to give in. The NAB is pulling no punches in defending such behemoths as Clear Channel Radio (CCU), Emmis Communications (EMMS) and National Public Radio- and will continue to do so until the fat lady finally sings (and is forced to get paid).

And in this corner: the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) represents the interests of some 1600 of our favorite record labels, including Sony Music Entertainment (SNE), Warner Music Group (WMG) and Univeral Music Group (Vivendi/VIVDY). Riding shotgun in the fight against the NAB is the musicFirst Coalition- who "represent" the interests of musical artists and performers (is there a difference?) and the like. Now, before you get all huffy and body slam the labels- you need to understand the following.

This is not the first war waged against musicians and record companies. In fact, there has been an ongoing world war waged against the creators and sellers of music by digital downloading pirates for many years now. These pirates have devastated the record industry- and have deprived musicians and songwriters of hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars in lost "artist" and "mechanical" royalties (monies that would have been paid by record companies to their royalty artists and the songwriters from record and digital downloading sales).

As sure as you're reading this article- I guarantee that you know many of these pirates personally. They're your friends. Your brothers and sisters. Your classmates. You may have been one yourself. Right? Caught ya, didn't I.

Despite the "ah, who cares, music should be free anyways" attitude all you pirates have- you've failed to understand the gravity of your acts. You've stolen money. Period. No different than if you'd gone into a record store, grabbed a bunch of albums from the shelves and ran out of the store without paying. And if you'd have been caught- you'd have been arrested. Get my point? Sure you do...except you've come to realize that no one's adequately enforcing the laws against piracy or that the courts have not slammed down on you from the git-go. If I'd have been any judge in any file-sharing case since the beginning of this thievery- I'd have sided against the perps and thrown your sorry butts in digital piracy jail (that's a special jail which exists in my backyard- where I stick copyright thieves and make them listen, 24/7, to Yankee Doodle Dandy- as sung by Joe J.D. Dandy).

So now that we're on the same page- this is my solution to this entire broadcast royalty smackdown. Listen closely. Then, when you get all closet Republican on me and start barking about bailouts, remember the copyright jailhouse in my backyard.

The taxpayer should pay all of the broadcast royalties due performers on an annual basis. You taxpayers have stolen money from performers, songwriters and record companies (whether done intentionally or by sticking your heads in the sand as your kids looted the internet). You need to pay it back. Parents and universities (the real taxpayers) have let piracy exist in the first place. And if you and your pals had been pirates when you were in your teens- and not yet paying taxes- well you're all grown up now and you're earning a living- oh and, congratulations, you're a taxpayer. Let's just say you now owe some back taxes.

We're talking about $2-5 billion a year that the broadcasters should NOT have to pay out of pocket. Both the NAB and musicians have legitimate beefs- yet instead of these parties fighting each other- they should be demanding restitution from taxpayers. All of them. Musicians, singers and songwriters do what they do to in order to make a living- no different than an insurance underwriter, a shoe salesman, a GM factory worker or a Bank Of America CEO. People seems to think that musicians are somehow at the bottom rung of society's employment ladder- who have no values, no work ethic. Do drugs- and live out of trailer parks. They're mistaken. Music professionals and up 'n comers work as hard, if not harder, than the average person. They put in long hours every day- and without the safety net of a college degree or a rich daddy in case the "ultimate payoff" of a record deal and big sales don't pan out. There is tremendous risk involved. And to then be "rewarded" by having people steal their music is, simply put, a crime. A crime of the pocketbook. A crime of the heart and soul that music is. Where would we all be without music...don't take it for granted. Foster its creation. Which also means that musicians (even drummers) must get paid. Do the right thing.

So, in what has been a terrible 18 months of "bailouts gone wild" - a lousy few billion dollars per annum is chump change. And it's money not only well deserved- it's money the taxpayer already owes.

So exactly how will the passage of the Performance Rights Act affect both broadcasters and record company stocks (in case it's not particularly obvious? And it isn't).

The "performance tax" (as the broadcasters are calling the currently proposed royalty), would probably have little, if any, negative affect on the larger Clear Channel-esque radio corporations- and may well end up helping them. The performance tax may hurt the smaller stations and their owners, who have claimed stuff like this could "put them out of business." And of course, whenever companies go out of business, well there is less "competition"- and the larger companies can swoop in and swallow up their market shares...assuming it fits nice 'n good within the anti-trust laws of the land as applied in the real world.

The record companies may stand to benefit from adding more "sound recording" income into their coffers- why else would they be fighting so hard for the broadcasting royalty. Of course, non-featured singers and musicians are destined, in theory, to benefit greatly, except the last time I checked, record companies don't get particularly excited by helping musicians unless there's something substantially in it for them. If the money came in and then went right out the door to the performers- that would not qualify as helping the labels' financial well-being. However, if the labels found a way to get a piece of a piece, well that's a whole other ballgame. Deeming performers (other than the lead singer) to be "non-featured" and snapping up big income caught in the red-line position recoupment cycle trap would certainly be an important boost toward income streams.

And, of course, labels are always looking for more leverage in their holy quest for a greater share of digital downloading revenue streams. Apple (AAPL) - are you listening out there in iTunes land? A broadcast royalty designed to pay performers is a "win" for the record companies on the road to a future digital download dogfight that ropes Washington in on the side of the RIAA. Can you say "big digital downloading 'tax'?"

My idea of having taxpayers pay the broadcast "performance tax" for past dirty deeds is designed to help the "little guy"- both small stations and performers alike. The labels and large radio companies are going to be what they're going to be. They'll survive in some shape or form. But, competition on the airwaves (and exposure for artists on smaller stations) is a good thing. Helping performers survive so they can continue to create better music that pushes the creative boundaries- is a great thing.

The two Bills on the table in Congress are: Senate Bill S.379 and House Bill H.R.848 .

What you need to do is pick up your cellphone or (iPhone) -or grab that mouse- and click the link below (yes- even if you're on a file-sharing site downloading music files)- and call or write your representatives and demand that- not only must a Bill finally (and immediately) be passed paying the darn annual royalty- but state that you equally demand Congress comes up with the annual stipend out of taxpayer funds- wherever they exist. Sell some more bonds to the Chinese if they have to.

And that you won't take "NO" for an answer. Tell them, at very least, that taxpayers are willing to subsidize the tab- in case the entire amount isn't do-able (hey, buddy- can you spare a billion-five?).

The NAB has more important things to deal with- like the newly proposed FCC broadband spectrum plan.

That way- the next time any of you steal music and rip-off record labels and musicians (even drummers) - at least you will have already paid a bit of your debt to the piper.

Write or Email your Representative: here.

Tell 'em GT McDuffy sent you. We've mobilized before (uptick rule and mark-to-market accounting for example). Let's do this one for the music guy...

GT McDuffy

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

To Heck With Fundamentals: Next Stop- DOW 11,000

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:28:00 +0000

As those of you who have read my finance articles already know, I was the first writer to call the current bull swing- way back in late January 2009, when the financial markets were in great peril, and it seemed that 50% of the so-called "professional" analysts were even calling for the DOW and S&P 500 to continue their slides into market oblivion. And 100% of them were certain the markets were destined to continue tanking. Newer lows. Re-test this. Re-test that. Then U-shaped recovery. Or maybe a W-shaped. Bump along the bottom. Blah. Blah. Blah.

Boy were they all wrong! And still are...

Rather than continue to blow my own horn however, or explain exactly how it is I knew the markets would rebound at that time - then play out exactly as they have done- heading straight up over the last 7 months (and will continue to do so), this article, instead, is geared toward the here and now (although I will say this: if people knew what really happened, there would, indeed, be quite a hubub, to say the least).

Many of us want to live in the moment (with an eye on the future). To this end, therefore, the markets will continue to rebound. The DOW will hit 11,000 on its next stop. The S&P 500 will hit 1250 as well.

Why?

Because it's not about the fundamentals (not yet). Again- I'm not going to get into the juicy details and sordid analysis of what tanked the markets in the first place. However, as the markets shouldn't have been down where they were in the first place, it stands to reason that they will simply head back to where they should have been in the second place.

Yes- it's easy to play the status quo game of fundamental and technical analysis. And, if I were to do so, well, of course, the markets should not be where they are now. But it's not about that at this place in time.

It's actually about one basic fact.

Traders crave "direction" in the markets. Other than the minority of die-hard short-selling fanatics out there, most investors actually yearn for a bull market in times of economic uncertainty and dire household financial realities. It's an emotional response to being American- fix what's wrong so we can all make money, take care of our families and defend our capitalistic flag, all at the same time.

In other words- bull markets feel good when economic panic has taken hold of our hearts and wallets. And bull markets feel extremely good when severe economic panic has taken hold of our hearts and bank accounts.

So, the next time you hear some financial analyst or economic egghead waffle on about the markets "re-testing the lows" or "pulling back to allow those who were late to the party get in" - forget these idiots. The markets heading up feels good. The markets will continue to head up until the the emotional panic or uncertainty finally dissipates. When we get to DOW 11k and S&P 1250- a lot the panic and uncertainty will begin to be ceremoniously replaced by greed and arrogance. Then we'll all be back to where we're used to being at. And I'll weigh back in at that time to put it all in perspective.

For now, my fellow Americans- enjoy the ride up. Get some sleep. Tell your families that everything is going to be alright.

GT McDuffy said so...

GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: author holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in the article above)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

Buy and Hold This! 5 Ultra Low- Priced Summertime Stocks

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Wed, 20 May 2009 05:51:00 +0000

As you know, in late February 2009, as the stock market was in extreme panic mode, I put together 5 very low-priced stocks to watch for an imminent bear market rally- a rally that took hold in full force only a week later. At the time I made these calls- I was met with extreme skepticism. Turned out I was right- and then some. The stocks I chose as potential 3-baggers, well, see for yourself how they actually fared:

Beazer Homes USA (BZH)- went from 56 cents to May 5th high of $3.95 (near 7-bagger)

Russ Berrie & Co.(RUS)- went from $1.34 to a May 19th high of $3.08 (and counting)

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) - went from $2.16 to a May 5th high of $11.94 (near 6-bagger)

Bank Of America (BAC) - went from $5.31 to a May 7th high of $15.07 (3-bagger)

Libbey Inc.(LYBI.OB) - went from $1.06 to a May 12th high of $2.75 (almost a triple)

I'd say my calls were pretty good!

Now I have a few more stocks to keep an eye on for the next few months- and for the longer term as well. Buy and hold ain't dead yet. These are stocks that can easily become 3 or 4-baggers (and even more).

Jabil Circuit Inc. (JBL)- JBL just had its credit rating upgraded from Fitch to BB+ with a revised mixed/positive outlook for the company. JBL will be paying down some serious debt over the next 1-2 years. Before the crash, the stock spent much of its adult life in the $15-35/share range- and in the event of a U shaped recovery, this one should be an easy double from its current $8/share price. In the event of a sustained rally (bear market or otherwise), this in one of those stocks that really climbs- straight up- with the market. So, it could be a a 3 or 4 bagger should things fly. True- neither the consumer, nor the automotive and aerospace industries will be coming back any time soon (blah, blah, blah)- but JBL has sustained a mountain of good and bad times like a champ- and it holds its own internationally-speaking. So it's a safer play, overall.

Drinks Americas Holdings Ltd. (DKAM.OB)- This up 'n coming beverage company, in its building stages, has Kid Rock Bad Ass Beer due out by Labor Day, 2009 (check out yesterday's RollingStone interview for more info) - with promotional units looking to coincide with his upcoming summer tour, which begins in June. This beer will be huge. The Kid is a winner, so I would bank on his beer being a winner, too. It could generate very large returns for the partners involved (and therefore stock holders). Bad Ass Beer is being brewed by the Michigan Brewing Company. Drinks Americas also recently acquired Dutch vodka maker Olifant Vodka, which will be co-sponsoring this summer's Snoop Dogg tour. Of note- In summer 2007, Drinks Americas announced a partnership with Universal Music Group's Interscope/Geffen/A&M Records to release beverages from several of its artists. Somewhere in the pipeline apparently lurks a Dr. Dre cognac - called Aftermath Cognac (Aftermath Entertainment is a subsidiary of UMG) -which was originally due out to coincide with Dre's mythical, re-worked and delayed Detox LP. Meantime- Death Row Records is working on the final touches of Dre's "The Chronic Relit.” Drinks Americas has distribution around the world (and may be working on locking in a new Asian distributor)- and has recently secured a new line of credit through Premier Trade Solutions. The stock (on the OTCBB) is currently in the 13-15 cent range- way too low. Given what is on the plate- this stock could launch at any time as word gets out to investors about this off-the-radar company. Hard to say where the stock will end up in the longer term, but, certainly, it would be worth holding for a couple of years, and certainly in the near term.

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS)- If you believe that the financials will eventually recover to even one-half of whence they came, pre-Great Recession, this is the one for you. This ETF contains some of the big bank players and is specifically geared to triply-emulate the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index. FAS is currently bouncing between the $8-12/share range, up from the $3-5/share range that preceded the early March 2009 financials bang-up. The ETF debuted in mid-November 2008 at $29.22/share and ceremoniously tanked as the bottom dropped out of the market. This sucker has mega-major daily volume (so it's essentially manipulation-proof)- and stays pretty dang true to its chosen index- unlike some of its ETF step-cousins. Since it can leap (and fall) in leaps and bounds- it has become the defacto day-trade. However- when you get tired of trying to pin-the-needle-on-the-FAS-donkey jumping between the channels, you can easily buy and hold it for the longer term- which can mean $30-50/share at some point in 2010 when the market finally pomps and stomps its way steadily higher, despite the gloom-sayers. The RFSI is currently at about 140- and it would be at about 315 in a more normal environment, which means about 6x where the stock is now (seems that FAS goes at a 2.6x/index average clip rather than 3x). And, if you don't believe the financials will recover- well, you can buy (long) its evil twin- the Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ)- which conveniently operates the same way as FAS- only in reverse.

Image Entertainment Inc. (DISK)- I recently wrote a piece about this California-based digital/DVD distribution company. Shareholders were sent on a wild roller-coaster ride involving DISK's M&A situation with Nyx Acquisitions Inc.- which, ultimately fell apart, leaving the stock down in the 80-90 cent range. The company has received buyout offers in the $2-4/share range over the last few years- including the recent $2.75/share price offer by Nix. Yes- the economy has trounced M&A since the markets tanked- but the acquisitions environment has been improving as the markets have now, essentially, bottomed. Image has just inked a 5-year deal with Universal Music, sales are steadily improving and I would expect more buyout-news coming over the next while- bouncing this stock to the $1.50-2.00/share range. Additionally, as the overall market improves- so too will the stock prices of these kinds of companies. So this one could end up at $4-5/share a couple of years from now. Be aware that the company has an upcoming $4 million payment due to the Portside Growth and Opportunity Fund on July 30, 2009- and may have to issue equity or debt securities to raise cash in order to satisfy the obligation- said schedule and payment being subject to any re-negotiation made prior to June 30, 2009.

Stemcells Inc. (STEM)- I know, I know. A company for speculators. The stock has moved up from the lower dollar range to the upper dollar range recently, and seems to be in a holding pattern as investors try to figure out- "so where do we go from here?" My feeling is that, as the stem cell sector is in a brave new world- under the aegis of the new administration and a boat-loaded Democratic Congress- we'll have 8 years of Obama-land for which stem cell potentials to become closer to realities. This would suggest the sector- and emerging companies like Stemcells- will have very strong anticipation from the market going forward. So, as things progress from here- this stock is cheap, give or take 50 cents. Could end up at $10-12/share in 2-3 years and $4-5/share on the next stop.

All of the stocks above are speculative by nature. Do your own due diligence and come to your own conclusions.

GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: author currently holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in the article above)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

Financials Party On: No Mutual Fund Left Behind

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Sat, 09 May 2009 21:20:00 +0000

(Satire)

Many traders and mom 'n pop investors have been asking why the financial sector continues to rally- seemingly unabated. Many supposed "professional" traders and market strategists appear regularly on the networks and in the blogosphere- trying desperately to slow the ramp, in fact, saying anything they can that starts with Skepticism in order to initiate a pullback- so that they and their clients- you know, the Big Dog Money- can get in on the long-side lower, rather than, heaven-forbid, have to chase the herd.

It pains them greatly that thousands of day traders (big and small) from around the world have lit a fire under the proverbial arses of the financials. Indeed, it pains these Big Dogs greatly that they no longer control the markets with the same lock 'n load that they did just a few years back. This is not your Daddy's trading environment anymore. This is war between the old money and the new money. So far- the new money is shellacking the old guard- plenty.

And now the institutions, mutual and sovereign funds have to play catch up. Scratch that- now they have to somehow catch a ride on the financials rocketship that has already taken off- last seen heading to the Moon- in order not to be embarrassed as the "Big Funds Left Behind." The ones that missed the party.

This is the way it should be. We are in a brave new trading world. Sure, the funds are up to their same old tricks. They try to "manipulate-down" using every tool they have in their arsenals- just as they have in the past. You know- leaking "negative" information and opinions to the networks and press hoping they repeat them on-air and in-print. Sending talking heads out to "bash" the sector and scare the day-trader longs, even though day-traders, battle-hardened by the message board bashers, simply laugh and continue to trade "as if." They recognize that just because you're on TV bashing, doesn't make it any different than the bashers on the boards- only shinier and hitting a network audience.

The Big Dogs try to push the pre-market futures and ETF's down trying to scare day-trader longs into selling, and engender shorts into shorting. They screw at will with the options markets hoping for golden chutes (forget green shoots). Then, like clockwork, the funds come crashing into the financials mid-day for a couple of hours and buy-in long at a somewhat lower price than they would have had to, playing out any hedge funds who have dared to be swill (and there were a few lately- that is, those even left in the game), blowing-out any and all shorts, using them as kindling wood for a short-squeeze bonanza. Then toward the end of the trading day- just as long traders get wary and begin to take profits, shorts sure they've caught a top as the market recedes- look out Mama! In come the Big Dogs yet again- and once more the markets close out higher. Then, after-hours, the whole thing begins to repeat itself.

Same old game. Different day.

Well, it is a different day.

The Financials Rocketship Has Already Lifted Off

Of course, as the financials and overall market go higher and higher- every Big Dog manager who hasn't been playing gets more and more nervous. "This is supposed to be a bear-market rally! How can this be happening? Is this 1991 or 2003? What if it is? Wow! I'd better get the heck in this thing before my clients run me out of town."

Get On the Magic Bus

Gadzooks, Elroy! What's a poor big-money manager to do?!

I'll tell you what you do, clodhopper. You get on the bus and don't stop 'til I tell you to. And that would be when the S&P 500 hits 1150 and the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index hits, at least, 250. That's right. The RIFIN.x, even with the current "monster rally" in financials underway, is only at 149. In September 2008, as the market began to unload, it was in the 220-230s- so there's a lot more to go just to get back to crash-in-motion levels. And that doesn't even include where it would be if the financial sector was remotely healthy!

Then, when we hit these levels- you get to get off the bus. Have a smoke. Get back on the bus- and we drive around in circles for a while as we all figure out the next consumer-spending hoodoo spending widget.

A Nation Of Shopaholics

A nation of shopping addicts we are. So, yes- someone on this here bus will figure it out. And then we'll be off heading north along route North Bound Greed- I Mean Green Is Good soon enough.

But, what about savings? They took away our credit candy!

What's that you say? You want to save? Tell, you what little big man. We'll save when we're dead. Meantime- they can limit our credit card privileges. They can tell us to live like our great-great-grand-parents did who grew up in the Great Depression. They can FASB 157 us into a filibuster-proof Save The Whales Dem-elected Congress and White House- shoveling in all the pent-up regs, plans and budgets they've been Jonesing to drop on the nation for 8 years. They can take away our home-prices-will-rise-forever-can-I-please-Sir-have-some-more-refis. But- mark my words: someone will figure out the Spending Addicts' Next Big Fix. And they'll do it on the bus.

Meantime. enjoy the ride- Bank Of America (BAC), Citi (C), Wells Fargo (WFC), Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan-Stanley (MS), JP Morgan (JPM), State Street (STT) XLF, UYG, especially now that big-money sector rotation is flowing out of tech, etc., into the Banks- and all that side-line money is about to come home to roost- because there's no place like home, right Papa-ARM T?

The only "pull-backs" you're going to see are those intraday "dips" or 2-day lulls that the funds use to buy in. Don't panic. Buy alongside the Big Money.

If you're still dumb enough to short financials against the institutional and big fund money inflows, or listen to the bashers who will come on the tube or prime the print- trash-talking for a major pull-back or a re-test- well, you deserve what you get (and what you've gotten). Back in January, as the market was tanking, I was the first person calling for a long bull run (yes- before everyone else did). And here we are- we have Saturn in our sites.

The Bull Run officially started on March 6, 2009 and it continued on as of Friday May, 8, 2009. It will ramp through June 30, 2009 through the close of the 2nd quarter, take a breather, then continue on.

Stress This

I know many of you are wondering what the government was up to with the "stress tests." On the one hand (and on the surface) you could argue they were attempting to restore confidence in the system and with private capital investors potentially looking to buy up bank cap raises per the new capital buffer requirements. On the other hand, the White House has gone out of its way to vilify Wall Street's private investors- who no longer trust getting in bed with the government. And of course, to this end- the banks themselves are already chomping at the bit to repay TARP to get out of bed with those who wish to control them. An argument can be made that the White House is merely talking tough for the sake of the taxpayer constituents on Main Street, hoping Wall Street won't take it too seriously. Although, one can also say the government is hellbent on taking control of the banks- and used the "stress-tests" and the vilification treatment to ultimately get what they want.

Stupid Is As Stupid Does

I no longer worry one way or the other about the government's objectives in all this. The stupidity-contradiction factor is no longer worth the stress of trying to figure things out, and is two-fold. First-off: the government forced higher capital buffers on the very institutions they claim need to stop hording cash, lend it out and loosen up credit. Now the banks will horde their cash for cap reserves instead- and continue fighting with the government tooth and nail on the matter. Secondly: the government and Fed has claimed the economy is going to recover by the end of 2009 and certainly in 2010- yet their "stress-tests" are directed at a "what if" scenario whereby things do not improve, and in fact, get pretty darn worse- which means they're allowing for the possibility that their forecasts are entirely wrong.

Party on dudes.

Party on GT...

GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: author holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in the article above)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

Financials Have Run Too Hard and Fast- Tread With Caution

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:17:00 +0000

No doubt that the recent FASB decision to relax certain fair-value/mark-to-market provisions, along with the excitement of a short-seller uptick rule reinstatement smackdown, coupled with a few of our major banks having said they were "profitable" for the first two months of the first quarter 2009- and with some bright spots signaling a macro-economic bottoming-out underway, all have contributed to the remarkable punch up of the stock market since early March, led by financials.

Mutual funds have spent the last couple of weeks toying with the day-trading shorts (and perhaps a few brave hedge-funds stragglers). Just when shorts are certain they've picked a top, the behemoth mutual fund monsters let the financials drop, then blow the clueless shorts out with a time-tested short-squeezed mission statement: do not short on our turf.

Moreover, the fixed-income markets have shown an ever-increasing resilience- and, in fact, some real strength. This always bodes well for the long bull haul.

Yet, there are some reality checks here. First-off, one of things FASB did NOT do, was go retroactive on legacy bad assets. This is a huge letdown (although to have been expected), and the mods they did approve will therefore not have the real punch we mark-to-market mod proponents had wished for. And, of course, although the changes made by FASB will begrudgingly facilitate establishing a market for certain bad assets, if at a higher price than the PPIF's potential private investors might have liked, there will be many bad or depressed assets that will now not be offered up for sale, and kept in our large-bank black-hole boxes instead. On the other hand, the PPIF is such a sucker's bet for American taxpayers, why in the world wouldn't banks unload everything they've got while they've got Uncle Sam playing the shill.

There is an estimated $20-30 trillion in bad assets held by US and Europeans banks. Using a trillion dollars alongside some private investment money to wipe these bad assets of the books is akin to using a fly-swatter to whack away the flies on a dying elephant. And, then of course, we aren't even talking about the CDS market that expects payouts rain or shine. Think of these as the hyenas and vultures waiting to swoop down on our giant toxic elephant once he dies and his carcass is up for grabs.

Rest-assured, no one in the know in government or on the inside of the world's big banks and institutions want to talk about the black-box. Suffice to say, they'd rather just leave it at "too big to fail"- and, more than anything else, don't want any outsiders poking their noses inside the black-box- else that would mean true taxpayer outrage (which is why, when I hear all this talk about "transparency for investors," I really do have to chuckle, sadly).

Then again, as the taxpayers are being led to believe they can buy pieces of the dying elephant as part of the PPIF- then bet on more of where that came from- until the entire elephant is in the Smithsonian and no longer in the banking zoo. The shadow banking system is dead. Long live the banks.

Back on the ranch- FASB-mod inclusive/legacy assets excluded, first quarter balance sheets for the big banks will, therefore, be improved only marginally. How these assets are treated by the bank regulators as to cap reserves is, to me, a black-hole in itself. The stress-test results, about to be completed, will not be made public- leaving investors to guess wildly about the specifics- and even more wildly about the generalities- except that certain banks will be required to hold more reserves.

Moreover, the operating "profitability" of the big banks are cosmetically TARP-buttressed- fortified by the old sporting event called The Musical Chair Swap Meet between our institutions.

Rather, credit asset write-downs will continue to be horrific. Credit card defaults will continue to rise, especially as unemployment rises. Performing loans continue to deteriorate. Commercial real-estate continues to tank. Private mortgage insurers are going to continue to get hit from defaults and other impairments that have not yet shown up on their books. Their access to government program "bailout" relief will also be limited, if at all- and those dealing directly with Fannie Mae could face suspension in light of ongoing credit agency downgrade triggers.

So investors in financials, who have been basically day-trading stocks on daily news and hopes- are now getting suspicious of a sustained rise from here, although mom and pop investors out in the burbs are now wanting to get in while they hear that the gettin' is good. Institutions (always the last to know) are coming in just because they can (and this is big money).

But, my feeling is that, although there will be more upside to come over the next few months- there may now be a pause- even some real downside to financials. Mutual funds are going to buy lower and lower- as will institutions- as they realize they can do so. They're slow, but not stupid. And yes- swaps are raging. Puts on some of our large banks are on fire- and growing. Bets on a tank have been placed.

So, as fantastic as the recent run-up has been, it's a bit overdone for the time-being. Some profit-taking is in the cards for smart traders. And then simply wait April out. See what's what. Yes- there are those traders who refuse to take a break from the craps tables- but these are the suckers that the house looks to clean out and hand out free rooms as consolation prizes toward that trip to the casino next year.

Remember, if you've really been listening to Bernanke, Bair and Geithner (sounds like a law firm), you'll notice that the financial heavyweights with their fingers on the puppet-strings in Washington have NOT dismissed the notion that some institutions may need to be wound down if necessary. This is a polite way of saying, "We won't let anyone fail in one fell swoop like Lehman Bros, but that doesn't mean certain large banks won't fail slowly, like AIG (AIG)- pumped up with taxpayer money as their assets are slowly sold off, leaving vastly-smaller leaner, meaner banking entities."

As to which large banks would be involved to this extent, I am not going to speculate. Wells-Fargo (WFC)? Bank Of America (BAC)? Citigroup (C)? Who knows. But, any announcements or leaks forthcoming that certain big banks already TARPED could require more capital injections in the event of a downturn would be a complete downer for the pumped up financial longs. And the financials could turn south in violent fashion. Actually, I will speculate: I like Bank Of America's chances of staying strong and proud- it only makes sense- after all, they handle, in some capacity, pretty much everyone in this country. Now that's too big to fail! I like Ken Lewis. He may be part of the old guard, but he don't take no mess from Obama. In fact, if they move in on Bank Of America's boardroom, I'm moving to Thailand- because that'll be the final nail in the free-market capitalist coffin.

The results of the stress-tests are apparently going to be completed by the end of April. And our large banks are announcing first-quarter earnings, for the most part, beginning the week of April 13, 2009 through the week following. So, I look at any more ramp up in financials as longs trying to milk some quick profits off of funds and burb-people who haven't read this article, before the bottom falls out.

I was the first to initiate this whole market-to-market suspension/modification craze. I was the first to initiate this whole restoration of the uptick rule craze (and to take on short-selling manipulation relating to changing the price test). I have engendered an army of investors to write their Congressional Representatives in regard to mark-to-market and the uptick rule. I have people from certain networks reading my articles and then expounding about them on-air within hours (God Bless Them). And I have many in power in D.C reading my articles and then using them to hit home-runs in their neck of the woods.

I was also the first, back in January, to call a bottom, and for a long bull run to start on Valentine's Day in February (although I was 3 weeks early)- which was scoffed at.

Now I'm telling you all to tread carefully. I hope I am wrong. I hope this market keeps going until it hits 16000.

Meantime, I'll leave you all with a quote from everyone's favorite farmer- Thomas Jefferson:

"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have..."

Don't believe me? Ask General Motors (GM), the UAW, the bond-holders and the good hard-working citizens of Michigan.

GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: author holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in the article above)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

The Economy's New Clothes

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:27:00 +0000

No- it's not another B-rated fable film noir. Or maybe it is. Watching this whole economic crisis play itself out has certainly been a total schlock-fest.

Surely, those financial marketeers who have been watching the plot unfold on their giant Best Buy (BBY) LCD TV's over the last 8 months must be wondering why those in charge of fixing this economic thing haven't yet simply granted capital forbearance to the big banks- and be done with this total financial market fiasco.

It's Logical. It's Free of charge. And, this Economic Nightmare would be over and done with. Make the banks keep necessary capital reserves- but only when it's necessary. This will instantly free up capital for loans and, yes, will immediately restore liquidity to the markets. Not for re-engendering perverse risk, but for healthy entrepreneurship and day-to-day corporate flow. Couldn't hurt the growing ranks of the unemployed either, of course.

Sure, if a bank anticipates credit losses, it should have to anticipate keeping the necessary capital on hand- but only when the credit losses actually come in. And, at the point where these credit losses actually come in and there isn't enough cash on hand- then the institution can be TARPED if required. It's not like the powers that be don't know where to wire the money in a heartbeat- as it's needed. And, it's not like the regulators don't have the road maps to the Big Boy Banks in case anyone's expecting a lack of fair play or excessive risk-taking in the making. Actually, no large bank is going to go leverage-crazy with the whole world watching. Those days are over.

Furthermore, why in the world are these banks being forced to keep capital reserves for non-credit losses: for depressed, distressed or, gadzooks, "toxic" assets that were meant to be held to maturity or sold at some future point in time if and when the market for them is much better. And, the assumption is, that for a whole lot of assets currently in the dumps- it will get better. Obviously.

If a bank isn't planning on taking the write-down, why should it be strangled by that decision because of a bunch of accountants at FASB?

Because marking assets to market was intended to create "transparency" for investors? You mean the same investors who day-trade on the markets as the "gang that can't shoot straight" - who don't care one iota about transparency- who are only looking for a quick trade based on herd mentality? In fact, the mentality created specifically by the financial media- and no one else.

Then there are those fund investors, big and small, who manipulate the markets for a living. Are these the people for which "transparency" was designed? The "window-dressing" close of the quarter truth-tellers, the rumor exploiters and the bid-pinners? The swap sharks? Yeah, right.

And, who's left in the investor population after funds and day-traders? Retail investors? So, what percentage of these investors actually know how to read a balance sheet? Very few, indeed. Most retail investors ask their brokers to recommend stocks. Inevitably, brokers pick stocks that are doing well as "sector plays" and based on what other brokers are doing- which are largely connected to what "analysts" are supposedly following and on what our spanky clean credit rating agencies are watch-dogging. But, when's the last time "transparency" played a legitimate role in relation to anyone rotating sectors or making a due diligent and clean upgrade or downgrade in between making a buck on the boys in the back.

Exactly.

Oh, and let's not forget the 401k set of investors- the ones who blindly pile their retirement money into the "blue chips" and the well-known large caps. To them I say: mark this!

So, what have we been doing here exactly with all this bank and FASB nonsense- except giving shorts a blank check to beat down financials- destroying the very investors and institutions that FASB and the SEC claimed it was trying to protect. Nothing against the SEC- they do what they can with what limited funding and manpower they have to deal with. But, enough is enough.

After two and a half years of FAS 157 destroying massive amounts of capital wealth- FASB is now finally been forced to kick out the M2M on distressed assets, yet exactly at the same time as Geithner's toxic asset PPIF plan rolls into town, which is, bizarrely, all about having sellers sell at the lower market mark rather than at the higher maturity or model price?

Can it get any more ludicrous than this?

And, what about the part of current M2M being exploited by buyers of distressed assets- who take advantage of the spread between the M2M price and the price these assets can actually fetch in the real world to turn a profit. So these buyers have been getting a free mark-to-market lunch while the sellers (uh, the banks) get strangled on the sale- on top of having to maintain capital stuck on the market mark? Who's side are we on- the private buyers of debt, or the sellers we are supposed to be easing up on in order to have them stop hording cash and lend in out instead?

Exactly...

Then, of course, you now have the large banks going through "stress tests" to determine how much capital they should hold in the event of an even greater disaster than the one we've been in?

What?

If we're about to separate credit losses from illiquid asset "losses" with mods to M2M and encouraging increased regulator discretion (which they already had a long time ago, but didn't use), then, on the one hand, the banks would need more capital, but on the other hand they'd need less capital!? Who the heck is running this crazy ship! The regulators are going to need straight jackets and a trip to the white room.

I'm heating up. Hold onto your shorts.

I keep hearing about how the "taxpayers" are angry about Citigroup (C), Bank Of America (BAC) and General Motors (GM) bailouts and AIG (AIG) bonuses- that they're so incredibly livid out there on "Main Street" that bankers and highly-paid corporate execs better watch out. Take no bonuses- but better not jump ship for better-paying pastures. Work for the cause.

But, you see, the "taxpayers" are mostly rich and upper income folks and businesses. And you know, they're not angry! At least, not at each other- only at those who keep pecking away at their rightful keep.

That leaves the middle class and low income folks (who pay very little of the actual tax in this country). The middle class burb people aren't angry about bailouts and bonuses- at least they shouldn't be, they barely pay anything into the economy! They just want to get back to shopping and left alone to watch basketball and football on the tube. They only thing they should be angry at are all the jobs which have been sent to other countries (which was a problem that long preceded the mess we're in, and certainly didn't cause it). But, bailouts and bonuses?

Which leaves the poor folks- who pay nothing in the way of taxes and, in fact, receive most of their benefits on the backs of the richer set. So are you telling me that it is these "taxpayers" who are angry at the same Wall Streeters and corporate executives who already pay for them to subsist in the first place- as the poor and lower income set relentlessly drain our resources? Can you say Nixonian economic angst ten times fast?

Well, then, if it's really just the poor class and the jealous middle class "have-nots" who are so "enraged"- and they shouldn't be- then maybe they're being manipulated into thinking they're supposed to be, so that certain laws and regulations can get rushed through while they aren't paying attention, for the benefit of those in Washington and, in the end, those on Wall Street.

I've had it with all this garbage.

This whole "economic crisis" came about in the first place because there were those in charge who absolutely foresaw the ramifications of FASB 157 in a down market. The risk to capital. The credit agency downgrades following the downward spiral. The repeal of the uptick rule, when, in fact, there were those who tried to get a modernized version restored a long time ago- but were shot down. And on and on and on...

When does it end! When do the people of this nation take the blinders off and start effecting change they deserve themselves- instead of having it handed to them like heads on a silver (or rusted copper) platter!

Wake up people! Wake up!

People are getting rich- and are about to get a whole lot richer on the backs of this crisis. You are losing your jobs and living in tent cities because you aren't seeing things for what they really are. Because you are being kept blind and stupid.

Use a little logic. It will all make perfect sense.

Then, for the love of God, get off your collective butts. Stop with the class warfare- and see what you can all do as a united class.

The United Class Of A Truly Enlightened America.

Capital forbearance for our banks- the McDuffy Way. Write or Email your Congressional Representatives. Our write-in campaigns effected change on mark-to-market and the uptick rule. We can do this one, too. The last piece of the puzzle.

It's now or never. It's in your hands. It's got to change.

GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: author holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in the article above)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

March Madness Comes To Washington

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:05:00 +0000

College hoops. Washington goofs. Springtime is here again.

If you think President Obama loves basketball- well, he must really love what March Madness has brought to our nation's Capitol. So, just as the Prez has handicapped the tournament- I thought I would offer all you crazy Americans huffing and puffing up the new class warfare a bit of the McDuffy Madness myself.

And, here it is:

The McDuffy Manifesto For All Good And Angry Main Street Americans

Rather than always blindly channeling your anger at those whom the media tells you to, understand that Main Street Media nearly always gets it wrong- and, instead, fosters their "pseudo-journalistic" intent strictly for the purpose of getting ratings and advertising income. Rarely does the media do anything which is best for Main Street.

Learn to focus your anger on the real culprits- not just on Wall Street and in Washington D.C., but, especially, on your fellow taxpayers. Understand that, although it is all three of these "groups" who are responsible for the current economic crisis, you only have to look at yourself and at your neighbors- the real culprits behind the mess we're in. It is you and your neighbors who decided to live on credit cards and mortgage "re-fi's." This is a Main Street addiction that is simply fed by Wall Street. You all just assumed the economy would continue to be great- and your addictions would be sustained. Now, you're looking to blame the dealers. Blame yourselves.

It is your own low-income fellow taxpayers who took out subprime mortgages knowing they would not really have the ability to pay them off once their monthly payments ballooned. These taxpayers were free of will upon signing their mortgage agreements- no one forced them to do it- and few were actually misled into signing the agreements- contrary to what you have heard on TV. Most subprime mortage folks believed that, worst case scenario, the increasing equity in their houses would backstop any failure to pay, as long as the housing market kept going up. Yet, at the same time subprime and the economy was raging, everyone on Main Street suspected that there was something wrong- that there was a bubble getting ready to burst. There were quite a few people, in fact, who were consistently warning of the housing bubble. Yet, nearly every taxpayer swept the warnings and his or her own intuitions under the rug, hoping things would just keep going as they were.

It's far too easy to blame the mortgage brokers for the mess, or those on Wall Street firms who took advantage of these "subprime" circumstances to make millions. Likewise, politicians did nothing to stand in the way, even though many of them knew what was happening. So who do you blame? Blame everyone and blame yourselves- and now move on to fix the problem. Which means fixing yourselves and your own lifestyles. Do not get distracted by the media's profit and power agendas designed to stir up class warfare for the sake of their ratings and influence- for it will be at your continued demise. Wall Street is greedy, but they adjust their greed in ways that ultimately fix things for Main Street- so, if you all want to go back to shopping and building wealth yourselves, Wall Street is a huge part of that process. When things were going well for the majority of you on Main Street (yes- even all you middle-class people), I didn't hear you complaining. And. I certainly didn't hear you defending the lower-income folks.

The AIG (AIG) situation is not what you think it is. The key executives and traders of AIG finanicial instruments who made all the bad bets and strangled the global financial system are no longer with AIG- so when those in the media and politicians manipulate you the taxpayer into going after those currently at AIG- your anger is completely misplaced. The current people at AIG are actually there to help fix things. Where are the original traders? Who knows. Who cares. Move on.

Which means that moving on is telling your politicians to stop using you to get bills passed while your anger is being manipulated for their purposes- purposes which are actually not in your best interests. Remember- your best interests are to let Wall Street do what they do best. And to improve your own status in life without using up useless energy on New York and D.C. If you want to strengthen your middle class existence, then do your middle-class thing. Work hard. Work for your family. Work for your neighborhood. Improve your skills. Improve your dedication to work. If you were to ask Kobe Bryant how to fix the financial crisis, he would tell you to focus on your own game and work so hard at it, you'll realize you need to work even harder on it. The work never stops. There is always room for improvement in your game.

Forget the politicians. Forget Wall Street. Forget the big banking and investment institutions. Citigroup (C), Bank Of America (BAC), JP Morgan Chase (JPM), Wells Fargo (WFC), Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) will go on in some form. Bigger. Smaller. Does it really matter? Think of them like the team owners and front offices or the NBA executives who work the money and set the rules. It's going to be what it's going to be. At the end of the day- you have yourself and your team mates (your neighbors). Just as long as you don't give the owners enough rope to hang themselves and ruin the game.

So now that you realize where to channel your anger- forget it.

It's time to back off, mellow out- and get back on your own benches. Let the refs hand out some technical or flagrant fouls- and throw some offenders out of the building. Let the league hand out the necessary suspensions- but, just don't let them change the rules of the game. We like the game.

Don't give the politicians more than they deserve- they'll do what you tell them to do. And whatever you do...do not listen to anything that Main Street Media has to say. They're worse than clueless. They have no problem bringing down this great country in the name of advancing their own agendas- no matter what the cost to the taxpayer. The days of Woodward and Bernstein are gone forever. All that is left is a slew of useless anchors, talking heads, reporters, writers and media executives looking to make a buck by talking trash about the world at large, and stirring up us little guys so we actually stay tuned and pay attention to the garbage on their stations (and buy the products they advertise).

Let's get back to winning a championship- and forget all this nonsense...

GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: author holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in the article above)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

Your Next Trades for Mark-To-Market, The Modernized Uptick Rule, The PPIF and TALF

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:14:00 +0000

Everyone following the financial markets recently saw major pops across the spectrum. Rumors about FAS 157/mark-to-market/fair value accounting modifications, the reinstatement of the uptick rule, the coming public/private partnership relating to the buying up of distressed assets, along with some of our largest banks announcing they had operating profits over the first two quarters of 2009 made the stock market run like the wind.

Now, rumor is turning into reality. More light has been shed relating to FASB 157 and the uptick rule- scaring the pants off the shorts. Indeed, shorts have been covering their positions near and far. Yet, with each continuing ramp up of the market, they continue to arrogantly believe that the bear market rally is nothing but a dead cat bounce- and are trying desperately to catch a top to short, only to realize they miscalculated- and have to cave in and cover-buy, each with successive short-squeeze fuel. Hence the market has been heading higher and higher. The short-seller vernacular has, indeed, changed from a "single-day" short squeeze to a "one week" bear-market rally- and as things continue to ramp up, this, too, will change to a "few week" bear-market rally. And then some.

You see- the estimated $7-10 trillion of Big Dog longs out there in the world will finally decide to come back in the market for the long haul. This has happened many times before. What starts out as a dead cat bounce catches fire like a twig in the forest, and turns into a raging bull-market. I've said it before- and I'll say it again. The long becomes the new short- and the day-trading clueless herd of shorts get overwhelmed and booted out of the game. Many short-selling funds have closed their positions and are now going long.

Here's more fuel for the fire coming this week:

One day after being confronted by an angry, impatient unified and bipartisan House Financial Services Committee- FASB, the SEC and the OCC agreed to finally move on mark-to-market and fair value modifications after 6 months of endless studies, evaluations and delays- else Congress would do it for them. To this end, FASB announced Friday that they were meeting Monday, March 16, 2009 (8am) to discuss issuing guidance clarifying M2M as applied to assets in illiquid markets A major step in the right direction- and just one of the important modifications coming. The HFSC wants all FAS 157 modification plans in place by early April- and in time for the upcoming April 2, 2009 G20 meeting. FASB will be voting on the matters discussed at the Monday meeting by then- which, in summary, would put discretion in the hands of the company to determine if a market for an asset is liquid and whether a transaction is distressed. FASB has put its M2M proposals up for public comment with the aim being to enable companies to use the mods for their 1st quarter 2009 earning reports.

Also on Monday, TALF will be kicking in upwards of $10 billion towards unfreezing the secondary credit market. And, the Obama administration will be seeing to shelling out stimulus bill cash toward reducing small-business lending fees. The government would also increase guarantees on some SBA loans to 90%. Officially the TALF will be launched to the world on Thursday (March 19, 2009), designed to unfreeze the consumer lending market.

On Thursday March 19, 2009 (10:30a), the powerful Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, led by Chairman, Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Conn), will also hold a hearing- Modernizing Bank Supervision and Regulation- which is another positive for the financials.

And, this week, big rumor has it that the Treasury may finally begin to roll out initial details of the much-anticipated PPIF (the Public Private Investment Fund). The markets are highly tuned for specifics relating to this plan that is designed to enable private investors to buy up distressed assets with the government acting as a backstop- providing low-cost funding and insurance- with potential returns for both the private side and the taxpayer. A huge bullish catalyst for the markets as the plan steps up in March.

Also, SEC Chairwoman, Mary Schapiro, said last week that the SEC is aiming to reinstate the uptick rule- with a proposal due in April. The SEC is meeting on April 8, 2009 to discuss various "price-test" options and alternatives related to short-selling (stay tuned for developments relating to these "alternatives"). Market pundits who think this is going to be the same old uptick rule, one which might be ineffective in today's fast-trading high volume markets, will be in for quite a shock when the modernized uptick rule with a new price test is finally rolled out. Much to Schapiro's credit- the new version (or alternative) will be quite effective, indeed. Equally important in any ultimate decision made by the SEC will be to what extent it is applied to market-makers in both the equity and options markets.

There have been those who have said that if the SEC were truly interested in reinstating the uptick rule, they would do it immediately- however, it will take a bit of time, technologically-speaking, to implement any modernized or alternative version (plus, the SEC has to go through the short "public commentary period"- which could put a final rule in place by the end of the 2nd quarter 2009).

Democratic Senator Ted Kaufman (D-Delaware) and Senator Johnny Isakson (R-Georgia) have also just introduced a bill that would order the SEC to reinstate the uptick rule within 60 days- with provisions that would prevent short-sellers in financial stocks from placing a short-sale order lower than 5c above the last transaction price- and would give priority to any longs selling shares. Rep Harold Ackerman (D-NY) has already introduced a bill in the House to restore the uptick rule.

To summarize "what's been what" with M2M modifications thus far:

Back in early February 2009, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Rep Barney Frank (D-Mass), said, "One of the things I think we should be exploring is the extent to which you can retain mark-to-market but make the consequences discretionary with the regulators rather than automatic." He has also, more recently, stated that there will be "substantial changes" made to mark-to-market.

There are several elements of the current "M2M" model which need to be resolved, rather than using the "one size fits all" rules under FASB 157: marking certain assets at maturity, marking assets trading in illiquid/liquid markets, marking assets in regard to a company's model and marking assets not easily "discovered," etc - to which, if modified/resolved, would help companies become truly transparent and potentially show many companies to be stronger, less underwater and in certain cases, no longer insolvent. Particularly important are issues regarding institutions that have capital requirements (ratios) tied to marks on certain assets.

In the words of Congressman Paul E. Kanjorski (D-PA), Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises, he wants "to find a way – within the existing independent standard-setting structure – to still provide investors with the information needed to make effective decisions without continuing to impose undue burdens on financial institutions."

Furthermore, while the government is trying to figure it all out, including the public/private partnership, some have also recommended suspending M2M altogether.

There is nothing wrong with M2M bringing transparency to investors as to a company's financial position- but, true transparency has proved to be quite complicated (and unfair in many cases) in the real world.

Section 132 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 "Restates the Securities and Exchange Commission’s authority to suspend the application of Statement Number 157 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board if the SEC determines that it is in the public interest and protects investors."

The powerful Paul Volcker, former Fed Chairman, and now one of Obama's key advisors, is a big advocate for modifications of the current M2M. Back in the early 80's, Mr. Volcker was responsible for bringing the United States out of a terrible financial crisis.

Volcker is also Chairman of the highly influential Group of 30. Another member is the G-30 is none other than current Treasury Secretary- Tim Geithner. In fact, if President Obama were thinking of replacing current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke with anyone who has history in his favor- that would be Volcker. Without a doubt, Geithner and Volcker would be a formative combination in resolving the current market crisis.

The G-30 is pro-revisiting M2M and making changes- which will be major market movers..

Section 12 of the G-30's recommendations:

Fair Value Accounting
Recommendation 12:

a. Fair value accounting principles and standards should be reevaluated with a view to developing more realistic guidelines for dealing with less liquid instruments and distressed markets.
b. The tension between the business purpose served by regulated financial institutions that intermediate credit and liquidity risk and the interests of investors and creditors should be resolved by development of principles-based standards that better reflect the business model of these institutions, apply appropriate rigor to valuation and evaluation of intent, and require improved disclosure and transparency. These standards should also be reviewed by, and coordinated with, prudential regulators to ensure application in a fashion consistent with safe and sound operation of such institutions.
c. Accounting principles should also be made more flexible in regard to the prudential need for regulated institutions to maintain adequate credit loss reserves sufficient to cover expected losses across their portfolios over the life of assets in those portfolios. There should be full transparency of the manner in which reserves are determined and allocated.

Here is an excerpt from the:

STATEMENT OF PAUL A. VOLCKER
BEFORE THE
JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE
WASHINGTON, DC
FEBRUARY 26, 2009

"3. As the financial crisis evolved, weaknesses in
accounting, credit rating agencies and other market
practices were exposed.

Fair value accounting rules were inconsistently
applied and have contributed to downward spiraling
valuations in illiquid markets. Credit rating agencies
failed to analyze collective debt obligations with
sufficient vigor. Clearance, settlement and collateral
arrangements for obscure derivative contracts created
uncertainty and need clarification..."

Warren Buffett has told CNBC that "mark-to-market accounting should be retained, but regulators shouldn't use it so much to require institutions to increase their reserves." This is in keeping with one of the primary modifications that can (and should) be made relating to M2M- and would result in relieving substantial pressure on the banking system- a major positive for financial stocks.

Buffett also thinks that debt currently valued at mark-to-market is a "good buy"- which bodes well for the forthcoming public/private partnership (PPIF) being put in place, assuming Buffett's sentiment echoes that of other private investors looking to buy up the "bad" assets (although pricing these assets is as much a function of whatever investors will actually want to pay for them as much as what they're marked to on an accounting basis. Currently, buyers turn (or would turn) a profit by taking advantage of the spread caused by M2M accounting rules and realities).

All indications presently show that there are many private investors who are willing to buy up debt (and are doing so), especially assets that are of a "less-toxic" nature, and, obviously, at as low a price as possible- whereas the holders of these assets would want to sell them as high as possible. Many potential large investors are jockeying for the most favorable terms and regs that would best support their agendas.

The most recent mark-to-market stock market catalyst was the March 12, 2009 House Financial Services Committee hearing spotlighting M2M and fair value accounting under FASB 157. In this hearing you heard testimony relating to the above modifications.

Back to normal mortals.

On certain finance television channels, there are a couple of TV anchors (with very limited or no economic cred) who have said that suspending or modifying M2M won't "do anything"- which, of course, is utterly ridiculous, so take them with a grain of salt. In fact, at very least, there will definitely be some major "tweaks" made- which will be game changers in. Especially in regard to banks' capital requirements and relating to distressed assets traded in liquid/illiquid markets- all of which will allow to investors to have more far more accurate information in evaluating companies and relieve substantial pressure on banks. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has recommended re-visiting these areas.

Investors should focus their attention on what Frank, Bernanke, Geithner, Volcker and Buffett have all said in regard to the value of making effective M2M modifications- rather than on what these certain clueless TV anchors say. Furthermore- one of these anchors keeps harping that the government doesn't have a "plan" as to what to do with toxic/distressed assets- which is also untrue- as the government has said they have the public/private partnership under way with the idea of providing low-cost loans to stimulate the buying up of these assets on the private side. Unfortunately, TV anchors and regulars have more "TV time" in which to spout a lot of misinformed nonsense. Most investors, however, have figured out who to trust and who not to trust.

So, how should longs and shorts continue to play the constant stream of mark-to-market, uptick rule, PPIF and TALF announcements, updates and meetings seemingly coming every day- that will continue to affect the markets over the next 4-6 weeks? As I've said before- it's probably not a good idea to be short overnight or over the weekend. And, longs would want to get in before after-hours closes, leading into the next trading day.

Longs definitely don't want to get caught chasing financials or other stock sectors as the markets head up- as I've said many times before- not with all of that Big Money sitting impatiently in Treasuries and Money-Market funds collecting pennies- all suddenly piling into the equity markets for the long bull run. Bank stocks (C, MS, JPM, BAC, GS) and ETFs (XLF, UYG) are but a few of the beaten-down stocks that will continue to run, leading the charge. Insurance stocks like Genworth Financial (GNW) especially, and Prudential Financial (PRU) are so oversold it's mind-boggling. Genworth is particularly interesting because it doesn't insure CDO's- and, therefore stands to benefit most with a broad market ramp up where wealth insurance is finally going in the right (bullish) direction.

If you are long on financials- hold your positions (and ride out any dips). Shorts- don't get caught short-squeezed overnight.

Remember- bear market rallies can suddenly turn into bull market rallies in the blink of an eye. As short-covering continues, this will have the inadvertent effect of pulling more and more of that Big Money in- before things run off without them. Indeed, last week's rally included large institutional investors (pension, mutual and insurance funds) finally beginning to come back into the stock market, according to Stuart Frankel & Co. president and NYSE floor-maven, Jeffrey Frankel.

Can you say- "No bull left behind?"

GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: author holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in the article above)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

Obama Made A Stock Call- Now He's On The Hook

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:24:00 +0000

We all heard him say it. USA Corp stock analyst B.H. Obama called for American stocks to outperform. Then again, he mixed up some terms in his statement. He probably meant "price-to-earnings" ratio, or something like that. But, hey- who cares! He's the one with the insider info. Insider info made public rules. No?

I guess, given the stock slang slip up, he's a newbie analyst at the company. But he'll learn. Newbie's have a lot to prove. And one thing is for sure- no analyst wants to make a bad call and be laughed out of town. Especially when billions of people around the world hear you make it. That goes for newbie analysts even more so. 'Cause you'd get fired if you're wrong, what with so many people hanging on your every word. Sort of like hanging on every word Meredith Whitney says about banks, only bigger in scope- and in the other direction.

I mean, Cramer makes a lot of calls on the tube. Meredith makes a lot of calls- and, she got some things so right, heck- she went and started her own firm.

Obama made a single call. But it rated a 2.9 for difficulty. So, everyone wants to see if he lands the perfect dive or if he hits his head on the board. Yuck!

Main Street- both taxpayers and investors (aren't they the same thing?)- heard it. And they're now betting for or against the Prez. He put it to them good: "Bet on Obama because I am Obama, and you just wish you were me"

Main Street fired back, "Uh, will that be a 401k straddle or a day trade close of market cover-buy?" Wait a second. That's Wall Street lingo...Okay. Try again, "We're heading to the Mall to pick up Susan, but, I'll call my broker once I open my mail that's been under my bed for 6 months. Have you seen my Hummer keys?"

Odds makers in Vegas lay odds at 3:1 Obama's correct. Then again, odds makers in Vegas are pretty much the only people left in Vegas, after D.C. law makers scared everyone out of town.

So how can you trade the Obama outperform rating? Simple: don't bet against it. Else he may socialize you. That means, for every trade you make on the market, he'll tax you .25% trader tax. Ye-haw. Now that's entertainment.

But, seriously, if you are trying to find a bottom, and wish to jump in, then drain the pool and take the plunge, You don't have to do a 2.9 DOD- just do a belly flop, and never mind the splat.

You gotta love it though. I mean, here we have the President of the United States Of What Was America providing a call based on insider knowledge- and the guy didn't even have to file an SEC form! Not only that- he's got no "safe harbor" worries because you can't sue the guy. And the SEC's new chief-ess, Mary Schapiro, owes him a favor or two for putting her at the helm.

So Wall Streeters and Main Streeters can take Mr. Obama's insider tip to the bank. Will that be a bailout bank- or my local credit union, then? Thank you very much, Sir. Never mind the no-frills, Sir.

Do you think Obama told Tim Geithner not to screw up the plan now that the world is now watching? Sure thing. Guys are guys. It's a bonding thing. Just ask the boys at AIG, Goldman Sachs (GS) and Bank Of America (BAC).

In the next little while, as details of the public/private partnership emerge relating to all those "toxic assets" (can someone please come up with a better name- I'm sick of this one), and details emerge out of the March 12 mark-to-market hearing aimed at relieving pressure on our institutions, it would certainly seem things are about to pop on the market (don't hold me to the day).

I know this pop is coming because the Man made the Call. And with each and every day that a hundred million US taxpayers are getting tanked in the markets- life savings going out the window- Obama will have some serious egg on his face if he's wrong, even in the near-term. Plus, he's got Doctor Doom in his back pocket.

It's a no-brainer.

The Crash was for a good cause, right? So, no one sell. And, everyone hit your bookies up tomorrow for a buy.

Remember- they'll give you the odds- and throw in the vig if you're chumped way up on the money...

GT McDuffy

(Author is long on Thomas Jefferson, a good ol' Capitalist Cowboy)

Subscribe (free) To: The McDuffy Report

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

A Sure-Fire Strategy For Republicans To Win Back Main Street In 2009

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:29:00 +0000

With great fascination, I have been witnessing the Obama administration punish Wall Street- and to try to "divide and conquer" Main Street in the process. To many who are "outside" Wall Street- this may seem like a good thing. But, since an estimated 90-100 million Americans are invested in the stock market- whether through direct stock purchases, mutual funds, IRA's, 401k's, etc., then Obama's relentless pursuits are actually simultaneously punishing Main Street.

The reality is that there are several things that the Obama administration and his Democratic posse can do to immediately halt the market slide and, in fact, would bring the stock market up in a major way- yet, it has become readily apparent that these are things that neither Obama nor the Dems are really interested in doing. In fact, it has become apparent that they are more interested in rushing their partisan agendas through an overloaded Democratic Congress while citizens are in panic and Obama's popularity is still high, rather then simply making the fixes I have alluded to.

Therefore, it has exposed an incredible opportunity for Republicans- to seize the moment and take back Main Street, and to do it immediately- at this critical point in the financial crisis and in American history.

It's a simple strategy and one that cannot fail:

The Republican Party, led by their best and brightest economic minds, should immediately host a slew of Town Hall meetings across America and explain to the American people exactly what the government can do to halt and "re-up" the stock market slide in clear and simple terms. The issue here is that the average citizen does not understand the mechanics of the stock market nor accounting procedures. yet they know something is seriously wrong with what is going on as they witness their stock market investments and retirement savings going down the drain. They just don't know how to put it in words- nor do they understand the technical concepts behind the fixes that are available that the Democratic-heavy government apparently does not want to implement.

Because, if the people of this great country realized how simple these fixes are to make- and come to realize through these Town Hall meetings that Obama and his posse haven't already put these fixes into place, when they've had ample opportunity to do so- any anger Main Street has against Wall Street will fly out the window- and, in fact, will be re-focused where it should be- on the Obama administration and certain Democrats in power.

One of these fixes is to fairly modify fair-value accounting (FASB 157's mark-to-market provision), which, strangely enough, is actually something that one of Obama's key advisors has been crusading for- yet Obama seems to have been shutting him out of the process. His name is Paul Volcker, a former Fed Chairman and the guy who actually already saved the United States from a previous economic crisis back in the early 80's. Instead, Obama appears to be hellbent on diverting the American people with rhetoric that Wall Street has gotten away with "accounting tricks" in the past. Yet, the reality is, the current accounting mark-to-market model has been unfairly applied to our institutions- to the incredible detriment of the markets over the last couple of years- and continues to do so. The SEC holds the power to suspend mark-to-market:

Section 132 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008:

"Restates the Securities and Exchange Commission’s authority to suspend the application of Statement Number 157 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board if the SEC determines that it is in the public interest and protects investors."

Interestingly enough, Mary Schapiro, is the new SEC Chairwoman appointed by the Obama administration, She has not effected action yet, despite the financial crisis being in full force. Another interesting thing to note: both Paul Volcker and current Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner, are both members of the powerful Group Of 30 who endorsed the following:

Fair Value Accounting
Recommendation 12:

a. Fair value accounting principles and standards should be reevaluated with a view to developing more realistic guidelines for dealing with less liquid instruments and distressed markets.
b. The tension between the business purpose served by regulated financial institutions that intermediate credit and liquidity risk and the interests of investors and creditors should be resolved by development of principles-based standards that better reflect the business model of these institutions, apply appropriate rigor to valuation and evaluation of intent, and require improved disclosure and transparency. These standards should also be reviewed by, and coordinated with, prudential regulators to ensure application in a fashion consistent with safe and sound operation of such institutions.
c. Accounting principles should also be made more flexible in regard to the prudential need for regulated institutions to maintain adequate credit loss reserves sufficient to cover expected losses across their portfolios over the life of assets in those portfolios. There should be full transparency of the manner in which reserves are determined and allocated.

So where is Geithner now on this matter- now that he is the guy appointed by President Obama to fix this financial crisis? Ask President Obama.

Another fix is for the SEC or Congress to reinstate a modernized electronic-trading-friendly uptick rule for stock trading, or to ban shorting on the bid, or even to suspend short-selling altogether- as the SEC already did temporarily last autumn (2008) at the outset of the first major leg down in the stock market- which resulted in stock prices roaring back because short-sellers were no longer capable of crushing stock prices downward- therefore destroying not only the stock prices of our great companies and institutions, but also annihilating Main Street America's passive investments, pension and retirement funds tied to the stock market. Unfortunately, the short-selling suspension was lifted about a month before the November 2008 elections. And, stocks began tanking all over again as more public panic ensued. Hmm...

Meantime, over these last months, neither the SEC, the Obama administration nor certain powerful members of Congress have actually undertaken to immediately implement any of the above fixes for the stock market- much to the dismay of those on Wall Street and resulting in mass public confusion and loss of wealth for those on Main Street who are seeing their money fade away with each passing day- and don't understand why.

A third immediate fix is to shut down the credit default swap market- which is a tool used by certain traders to manipulate the financial markets- and which has been under investigation by the SEC since last winter. It's March. Nothing. No fixes made.

And there are more fixes in the toolkit.

Meantime- Republican should jam home the message that President Obama and Democrats are fully aware that these fixes exist for them to effect (which Obama certainly is absolutely aware of), but seem to refuse to do so- and, at very least, are dragging their heels with endless "studies" and politicking.

So now you know.

And if Republicans bring this message to the people in simple terms- and jam it home in the context of my proposed Town Hall meetings (and on national television whenever they have the opportunity), and explain these fixes clearly and logically- Main Street will jump faster before the GOP can say how fast can we get to the next elections.

Except, we don't have until the next elections to get these fixes implemented. If we let things continue as they are- Americans will continue to see their financial well-being go out the window and will remain in panic. Job losses will continue to mount.

It's time for Republicans to move on this- because the Democrats are not. It's for the good of ALL Americans. And Americans will finally understand- in reality- why the "market crisis" persists.

GT McDuffy

Subscribe (free) To: The McDuffy Report

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

Image Entertainment: The Soap Opera Continues

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:20:00 +0000

Image Entertainment Inc. (DISK), a leading independent licensee, producer and distributor of home entertainment programming in North America, recently announced that it had informed Nyx Acquisitions, Inc., an affiliate of Q-Black, LLC and Joe Q. Bretz, that Nyx was in breach of their November 2008 merger agreement. Under that agreement, set to go into effect this first quarter, 2009, Image shareholders, who voted to approve the deal, were to receive $2.75/share.

It's all been looking very "iffy" -but now seems to now "getting better." Until the next relationship hiccup, that is. A real stock market soap opera.

Yesterday, under the continuing threat of Image terminating the agreement for cause, Image agreed that if Nyx, by March 6, 2009, deposits the remaining $200,000 of a half-million dollar additional deposit fee relating to completion of the merger, its completion date would be extended to March 20, 2009- while Nyx comes up with the necessary funds to finalize the deal.

The ongoing saga has sent Image shareholders on a roller coaster ride, to say the least, with each modification and extension.

This is not the first time that Image has found itself in troubling merger territory. A 2007 planned-merger between BTP Acquisition Company and Image ultimately became entrenched in an elongated "each side blaming the other" merger fiasco, which, in the end, fell apart in early 2008- leaving shareholders to raise serious questions in regard to the affair.

Also, a few years back, Image was the target of a hostile takeover attempt from Lion's Gate (LGF), in which Lion's Gate sent a 10-page a letter to Image stockholders urging the election of six independent board members "to replace Image's current directors." Lion's Gate made two separate offers over 13 months for $4/share- which Image decided was "inadequate" and accused Lion's Gate of keeping Image's share price from increasing due to its actions, hoping to have Image shareholders accept the $4/share offer.

Furthermore, in response to Nyx Acquisitions' November 2008 agreement to buy Image for $2.75/share, certain Image shareholders objected to that offer on the basis that it was too low, hiring a law firm to investigate Image for potential breaches of fiduciary trust and other violations of state law by Image's Board of Directors.

So, this latest merger saga with Nyx may come as not much of a surprise to shareholders or observers of all things Image Entertainment, yet, incredibly aggravating nonetheless- although it would certainly seem to make for great day-trading.

Could it could be a similar BTP Acquisition-type love in the afternoon quarrel all over again? Shareholder deja vu, indeed.

The only very positive common thread running through Image merger infamy, as consolation to shareholders, is that at least through all of the battling, Lion's Gate, BTP and Nyx suitors all prized Image at a minimum of $2.75/share, and up through $4.68/share (BTP). Image had also entertained serious potential offers (in the $2-$3/share range) from two additional suitors in 2008- but had decided to go with the Nyx deal instead.

So today's closing stock price of $1.14, from that perspective, is very low (discounting current broad market conditions).

One hopes, for Image shareholders' sake, that Nyx Acquisitions, Inc. makes good from its end. Obviously, Image Entertainment can attract suitors- which speaks nicely as to its value on various business levels.

Fellas- can't you all just get along?

Stay tuned...and certainly, don't change that channel.

GT McDuffy

(The author has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this article)

Subscribe (free) To: The McDuffy Report

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

SEC's Mary Schapiro Is Exploring Remedies For Short-Selling Manipulation

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:06:00 +0000

In early December 2008, the SEC placed my article proposing a remedy for short-selling manipulation on their website for consideration. My solution entailed enacting a simple rule: disallowing short-selling on the bid.

This idea is somewhat different than reinstating the uptick rule in that the latter solution provides that a short sale can only be entered after a trade causes the last price to increase; a short-seller can still short on the bid as soon as the last trade causes the stock price to go up (shorting allowed when the green "U" symbol or neutral "zero plus" shows up on Level 2).

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 10a-1 -- Short Sales [Removed and Reserved, Effective July 3, 2007]:

No person shall, for his own account or for the account of any other person,
effect a short sale of any security registered on, or admitted to unlisted trading privileges on, a national securities exchange, if trades in such securities are reported pursuant to an "effective transaction reporting plan" as defined in Rule 242.600 of this chapter and information as to such trades is made available in accordance with such plan on a real-time basis to vendors of market transaction information:

A. Below the price at which the last sale thereof, regular way, was reported pursuant to an effective transaction reporting plan; or

B. At such price unless such price is above the next proceeding different price at which a sale of such security, regular way, was reported pursuant to an effective transaction reporting plan.

My solution would allow shorting at any price and at any time, just not on the bid price, and negates most prevalent kinds of downward manipulation tactics employed by short-sellers to push stock prices lower and lower using a technique called "pinning the bid."

If short-sellers were operating ethically, they would want to short at as high a price as possible, and then have the stock move organically lower. Instead, shorts rely on attacking the bid price until it "caves"- which, in turn, results in longs panicking and selling lower than they would have. And potential longs (the smart ones) simply wait for the "pin the bid" attack (bear raid) to end- which is the point in time when shorts start to feel the bear raid may be overdone, and/or that a short-squeeze is overdue.

Very recently, the new SEC Chairwoman, Mary Schapiro, told the New York Times that she is "exploring whether to impose restrictions on short-selling...and is considering the revival of the uptick rule."

Shortly thereafter, Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, testified before Congress that, "In the kind of environment we have seen more recently" the uptick rule “might have had some benefit.” He also relayed that, if Mary Schapiro asked him, he would be in support of it.

Former SEC Chairman, Christopher Cox, who tried to get a modernized uptick rule restored last year, said he was out-voted by fellow SEC commissioners. His proposed version of the rule would only allow shorts to place their orders a few cents above the best bid. One of the problems in reinstating the original rule is that fast-paced electronic trading poses a very difficult-to-overcome operational logjam.

Which is why my version of the rule makes sense across the board. It's simple to implement in high-volume, fast-paced trading: any incoming short-sale offers would be instantly compared to the highest best bid price available and rejected immediately if they match that bid price- therefore, a short-sale offer price would be filled only by a long (or short cover-buy) coming up to a short-sale ask price. And, of course, once short sale offers are rejected for being placed at the bid price, or if short offers are meant to crowd a rising bid and risk being rejected, these short-sellers would then have to reload (or potentially reload) their trade tickets, or already have separate trade tickets ready to go- further slowing down the ability to attack a stock.

My idea also has the added benefit of preventing any naked shorts from "dropping" their illicit shares on the bid. Naked shorting is another huge problem relating to short-selling downward manipulation (although, there has been a large drop in naked shorting since the SEC warned brokers last fall in regard to Reg Sho discrepancies).

Whichever solution Mary Schapiro may choose, it is imperative that she holds true to her stated mission to move quickly- as with every passing day, the shorts are clobbering stocks left and right by manipulating stock prices downward in an environment where there are fewer and fewer longs trading (many of whom are simply waiting for the bear raids to play themselves out)- all of which is exponentially destroying the wealth of millions of passive investors, including those who have their 401k's tied to the stock market. Trading desks are fully aware that, in effect, "there are only two trades going on these days- the short-sale and the short cover-buying."

Any and all arguments that short-sellers make against reinstating the uptick rule or my rule is total nonsense- because the small minority of short investors who trade should not be allowed to do so at the expense and destruction of capital wealth of millions of American investors and companies. Especially in regard to passive investors who aren't in the market trading themselves.

In fact, suffice to say, the person who gets the uptick rule restored (or who implements my rule) will go down in history as the person who really saved the markets- and millions of long investors.

Because stock prices will start to rise, which will instantly stop the panic- and, soon after, confidence will be restored in the stock market.

Let's boot these shorts where it counts...it's for the good of all fine Americans.

GT McDuffy

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

5 Stocks That Could Triple With Next Bear-Market Rally

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:08:00 +0000

The market is poised for another intense bear market rally. So I scoured the penny stock panorama for 5 mega-poppers: those stocks that can easily pull a 3-bagger in a very short time. And, those that have a history of blowing up in sympathy with broad market short-squeezed-fueled exuberance.

1. Beazer Homes USA (BZH): This one has been punked down along with the homebuilders. Big short-squeeze potential. The homebuilders run up big as a pack, just as they have fallen as a pack. Beazer has been beaten down to a Wednesday February 25, 2009 close of 56 cents. This one can easily jump to $1.70, where it was at only a short while ago.

2. Russ Berrie & Co. (RUS): During the close of 2008's bear market rally, this stock exploded from $1.11 to the $4.50 range in a couple of weeks (and tripled in 3 days). Russ Berrie also happens to be a very solid company. They make infant and juvenile products.

3. Las Vegas Sands (LVS): Yes, Vegas is dead (will the last conventioneer out of Wynn-town, please turn out the lights). But, LVS is just one of those stocks that loves to run if given the rigbt broad market pop conditions. It closed today at $2.16. It was in the mid $6's only 4-5 weeks ago. Enough said.

4. Libbey Inc. (LBY): Libbey is somewhat on the rocks, given the recent market meltdown part 2- but its popper potential is valid. This one's an easy double, but it could triple with a little momentum. It likes to jump on a dime.

5. Bank Of America (BAC): I expect this Little Big Man Bankaroo to be the next true runner in the financials- an easy double decker. Thank Countrywide and Merrill for the ride. Yet, if the bear market rally has claws, BAC could head back to its December 2008- $15 range- in style.

GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: Author holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. He's too busy trying to get the Uptick Rule restored and Mark-To-Market modified)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

Stock Traders March On Washington

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:27:00 +0000

With global markets continuing to fall, hitting new lows not seen in many, many years, no buyers in sight, companies being obliterated- stock traders around the world finally got fed up and headed to Washington, D.C. today for the 10 Million Man March.

It had begun last week with CNBC's Rick Santelli calling for a Chicago Tea Party- a taxpayer revolt- and quickly escalated into traders heard screaming out their windows- "We're mad as hell, and we're not going to take it anymore!"

Not to be outdone, Larry Kudlow, CNBC's King Of The Hill, launched an out-and-out crusade against Bailout Nation, engaging Wall Street and Academic friends and foes in a bipartisan coup d'etat, to march on the Capitol.

Then, Jim Cramer, not to be outdone by Kudlow, jumped into the fray, quickly organizing his millions of Mad Money followers to join in on the March- imploring his throngs to "Boo-Ya" all the way along Pennsylvania Avenue.

Word of the march spread like wildfire- and traders near and far, already upset at the new Prez, his advisors, Congress, the SEC and FASB for being unbelievably inept and destructive- descended on Washington by the hundreds of thousands. Then, by the millions.

All longs. No shorts.

Chants were heard filling the air, "You want change Obama- we got your change right here!" (grabbing their groins in unison).

The Press flocked to the scene- camera's rolling- as the march headed toward the White House, finally settling at the Great Lawn.

Then, to everyone's amazement, JP Morgan's Jamie Dimon drove up to the show on a plain old beaten-up bicycle, carrying Girl Scout cookies and a very large bag. In front of the entire world, Dimon proceeded to dump 25 billion dollars (in thousand dollar bills) on the Lawn. Suddenly. a strong angry wind kicked up out of nowhere- and blew all that taxpayer money violently over the crowds.

Absolute Madness broke out as traders scrambled for the Free Money. Screw Bailout Nation. This is better than a 4-bagger!

Chaos ensued.

Warren Buffett was seen fist-fighting with Jim Chanos, growling that most of the money was his- and only his- flailing around, trying desperately to fend off the lowly day-traders battling for the cash.

Then, Michael Moore came piling into the melee. A true heavyweight. Yelling about some movie he was making about Wall Street that would shock people. He was there with his long-time agent, Ari Emanuel. But, wait! Ari Emanuel's brother is none other than Rahm Emanuel- the guy that got President Obama into the White House- and is now (ahem) the current White House Chief Of Staff. This was going to be a very interesting movie, indeed.

Just as suddenly, the wind stopped. There was an eerie silence.

A man appeared. He wore a black hooded robe- sickle in hand. Everyone stopped fighting- and stared.

The man turned solemnly to the masses and said, "Gentlemen- what, in God's Good name, have we here? Is this what we have become?"

And, a lone voice rose up from the herd and replied, "We are the Lost Souls Of Wall Street. We are Angry. We are Greed. We are Stardust. And we've got to get ourselves back to the Garden."

I shuddered.

The world had stopped. It was long past absurd. Was this all really happening? What had happened to the Markets I once knew- something had gone so terribly, terribly wrong.

Yet, this was how it finally came to pass. Greed and ineptitude had finally done us in. I was speechless.

They were speechless.

No one understood. But, everyone understood.
No one cried. No one moved.

It had just turned 4 o'clock. The markets had closed, forever.

Born alone. Breathe alone. Die alone. It was the End Of Days.

Well, kind of. You see, after-hours had now begun...and everyone was piling into a brand new stock- Eschaton Corp.

God had just upgraded it to "Outperform."

Ticker: (ESCH)

by GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: Author is short on Eschatology)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

SIRIUS XM Radio: Reverse-Split Realities

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:53:00 +0000

(April 2009 Update - NASDAQ has just extended the bid-price suspension date again- this time through Friday, July 17, 2009- so apply this to article below)

On October 16, 2008, NASDAQ implemented a temporary suspension of the $1 bid price rule. This temporary extension, which was originally set to expire on Friday, January 16, 2009, has now been extended through Friday, April 17, 2009. Beginning Monday, April 20, 2009, NASDAQ will start a fresh clock ticking in regard to any company's stock whose bid price then closes below $1/share (from that trading day onward).
(NASDAQ Temporary Rule Suspension)

In other words, if before October 16, 2008, a company was still compliant (was not deficient) with the $1 bid price rule, and, prior to, or during the rule's October 16, 2008 through April 17, 2009 suspension period, that company's share price fell below $1/share- none of that would be counted toward the 30 consecutive trading day period NASDAQ clocks before notifying the company it is bid price deficient.

Case in point: SIRIUS XM Radio Inc. (SIRI) closed below $1/share beginning September 22, 2008, and has closed below $1/share for 102 straight trading days through February 17, 2009 (the date of this article). If NASDAQ had not suspended the $1 bid price rule, SIRIUS XM Radio would have already been bid-price deficient as of October 31, 2008, and, as such, would had already been notified by NASDAQ promptly after that date. But the rule suspension nixed all this- a freebie for SIRIUS through April 17, 2009. NASDAQ would only begin counting any 30 consecutive trading day deficiency beginning April 20, 2009.

In other words, in SIRIUS XM Radio's case:

September 22-October 16, 2008: company was not yet bid-price deficient- even though stock price had closed below $1/share for 19 straight trading days-- none counted.
October 16, 2008-April 17, 2009: suspension period. Any consecutive trading days below $1/share-- not counted.
April 20, 2009 onward: 30 consecutive trading-day bid-price clock begins (unless NASDAQ announces another bid-price suspension extension).

However, in regard to those to companies who WERE already bid-price deficient prior to the October 16, 2008 suspension date- beginning April 20, 2009, these companies in the compliance period will pick up where they left off. So for example, if, prior to the rule suspension, a company had 120 days remaining on its 180 day compliance period, beginning April 20, 2009, that company will then resume having 120 days left to comply.

NASDAQ implemented the bid price rule suspension back in October 2008 citing "extraordinary market conditions," noting:

"Given current market conditions, Nasdaq proposes to provide issuers of common stock, preferred stock, secondary classes of common stock, shares or certificates of beneficial interest of trusts, limited partnership interests, American Depositary Receipts,and their equivalents temporary relief from the continued inclusion bid price5 and market value of publicly held shares requirements."

"In the past several weeks, U.S. and world financial markets have faced almost unprecedented turmoil, and the Commission has acknowledged in several recent emergency Orders that this turmoil has resulted in a crisis in investor confidence and concerns about the proper functioning of the securities markets.7 As a result, the number of securities trading below $1 has increased dramatically. For example, as of September 30, 2007, there were 64 securities trading below $1 on Nasdaq. By September 30, 2008, that number had increased to 227 and by October 9, 2008, there were 344 securities trading below $1 on Nasdaq and over another 300 Nasdaq-listed securities trading between $1 and $2.8 Nasdaq believes that during this time there was no fundamental change in the underlying business model or prospects for many of these companies, but the decline in general investor confidence has resulted in depressed pricing for companies that otherwise remain suitable for continued listing. These same conditions make it difficult for companies to successfully implement a plan to regain compliance with the price or market value of publicly held shares tests."

All very well and good. NASDAQ-listed companies caught a 180 day break.

Which leads me to the point of this article.

The real problem for investors who own (or are thinking of buying) NASDAQ stocks, such as SIRIUS XM Radio, that have been consistently under a buck- is that there is the underlying risk that a company whose stock remains under a buck for 30 straight trading days is ultimately going to do the dreaded reverse-split upon expiration of the 180 day compliance period, in order to cure this deficiency (barring appeal or an additional 180 day compliance extension granted- see below). Once deemed deficient (eg- a company has been notified that it is deficient), a NASDAQ-listed company would have had to then have the stock price trading at a buck or more for 10 or more (not to exceed 20) straight trading days by the final day of the compliance period. And. if this had not yet occurred through "natural" trading, the company is then sent a determination letter by NASDAQ informing them that their stock is subject to de-listing. NASDAQ can then grant another 180 days to comply, but only if the company now meets initial listing requirements (prior to the expiration of the compliance period, the company was required to meet the less stringent continued listing requirements, such as the $1 bid price) - which are much steeper. And, if the company does- this fends off the need to reverse-split for another 6 months.

If, however, the determination letter that shows up at a company's "doorstep" also includes a determination that the company does not now meet the stricter initial listing requirements, the company's only options are then to accept de-listing, to reverse-split immediately (within days-assuming shareholder approval has already been granted) or to appeal (roughly a 2 month affair)- which is a process whereby the company notifies NASDAQ it is appealing, and an appeal date, once set, allows the company, in person or in writing, to present/submit materials with an initial-listing compliance plan to a NASDAQ-independent panel, which, if approved, could result in NASDAQ granting additional time to comply, say an additional 90 days, and, perhaps set requirements to hit certain milestones toward ultimate initial listing compliance.

At the point that all available options and extensions have been exhausted, and with shareholder approval, and assuming he company isn't (or won't be) also deficient in other regards, and, of course, assuming the company wants to stay listed, the "reverse-split" then becomes the one sure-fire method for the company to "get" (and sustain) their stock price over $1 for that "10 not-to-exceed 20 trading-days" requirement. In other words, if the stock price didn't get over a dollar for 10 straight trading days as a result of "normal" trading, the company is allowed to use "artificial" means to do it- and to reverse-split to a high-enough stock price so the stock doesn't quickly drop back under a buck! After all, NASDAQ doesn't simply want that stock price over at a dollar or more. It wants it to stay over a dollar or more. So the higher the reverse-split, the better, so to speak. At least in theory- and with all good intentions.

Keep reading.

This "artificial" method by which a company is allowed to regain compliance, to say the least, is an ill-conceived (and bizarre) part of the rule.

Keep reading.

As most traders know, stocks that reverse-split to their higher share price most often sink right back down again- after all, on the one hand, any underlying negative company/financial issues that may have contributed to the stock price going under a dollar in the first place are still there- these don't magically disappear just because the stock price takes on a shiny new reverse-split "happy-face."

And on the other hand, most short-sellers lick their chops waiting for a stock to reverse-split anticipating a bear-raid on the stock. And most savvy investors potentially thinking of buying the stock long, post-reverse split, know the shorts are going to pile in, so potential-longs aren't going to jump in any time soon.

In other words, the reverse-split, most times, turns out to be a cosmetic, artificial and temporary fix, that's it.

So, if the reality is such that a company's stock price is going to sink or be pounded right back down, sometimes to exactly where it was pre-reverse-split (or even below where it was), those long investors who seek to hold their positions pre-reverse into the reverse get "tanked" all over again once the share price drops. And it does not help the exchange on which the company is listed, in regard to achieving the obvious goal- which is to have companies maintain continued listing compliance.

Finally, of course, it certainly doesn't help the company that actually cares about its stock price (versus those companies- and you know who you are- who decide to use (abuse) a low stock price to initiate a share buyback- on the cheap, who first begin buying back shares under a buck, then use the reverse-split to proportionally reduce the number of publicly held shares, then wait for the stock to tank again post-reverse, and continue to buy back the reduced number of shares all over again on the cheap).

If, in the ideal stock market world, bear raids and short-seller manipulation didn't exist (see- A Remedy for Short Selling Manipulation), and companies didn't abuse the ethical considerations and rules of the stock buyback (SEC- it's 10 o'clock- do you know where your Safe Harbor children are?), then reverse-splitting wouldn't be as dreaded as it is by longs. And the company that reverses might have a fighting chance to regain its dollar cut-off.

But, until the SEC actually effectively deals, on a sustained basis, with existing market manipulation and unsavory companies, the under-a-buck cut-off should be eliminated.

Abolished.

This way, the stock price can exist under a dollar- shorts are much less likely to pile in under a buck- and if and when the company itself actually provides investors with solid financial reasons to justify a rise in the stock price to over a buck and beyond- the stock may well hit its mark. Those who have been holding the stock which fell under a dollar won't get "double-tanked" because of a cosmetic reverse-split share price that sinks back down again. And as importantly, if potential long investors know the stock won't be facing a reverse-split because of deficiency/compliance rules, they will be far more likely to buy in under a dollar- which may have the effect of actually getting the stock back over a dollar- the very thing the exchange wanted in the first place!

But, really, this whole thing about stocks under a dollar is all about "appearances." The buck cut-off is simply an elitist creation to separate the "haves" from the "have-nots." The stock market's own caste system, if you will.

And speaking of elitism: as for institutions being barred from owning exchange-deficient stocks or stocks that are under $5/share- this should be done away with altogether. The negative connotation of owning "penny stocks"- which are defined as stocks trading under $5/share- is now an outdated and inappropriate notion in 2008.

It's time to get this whole thing cleaned up once and for all. Its time has finally come. Whether a stock is under $1 or under $5, in this crazy economic environment, or in the future, should no longer matter. It is, without question in the best interests of ALL investors, companies, the exchanges and the taxpayers (although not so good for short-sellers). The exchanges shouldn't be in the business of worrying about whether or not a company's stock price is at any particular level, or that the company maintains a certain ongoing market cap. They should accept companies into their exchanges that qualify on the basis of initial listing requirements, but, once they're in- let them play ball! Make de-listing only the result of serious infractions committed. And, as such, the SEC should then ensure such companies cannot re-enlist anywhere else.

As for the OTCBB- let the them continue to be the AAA farm club league for developing companies that need to qualify for initial listing requirements of the major exchanges before being able to bump up. Let the Pink Sheets (AA league) exist for companies that are in chapter 11 bankruptcy or are not yet ready for the OTCBB or the major leagues.

And, at the very least, do way with the dollar bid price rule. That would, surely, be a start.

GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: author holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this article)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

Congressman Ackerman Introduces Bill To Re-Instate The Uptick Rule

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:01:00 +0000

As some traders are already aware- on January 8, 2009, Rep. Gary Ackerman [D-NY] introduced Bill HR 302 IH in the House Of Representatives to "require the Securities and Exchange Commission to reinstate the uptick rule on short sales of securities."

The bill has now been referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and is co-sponsored by:

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy [D-NY]
Rep. Anthony Weiner [D-NY]
Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D-NY]
Rep. Michael Thompson [D-CA]
Rep. Nita Lowey [D-NY]
Rep. Michael Capuano [D-MA]
Rep. Ed Perlmutter [D-CO]

Here is the text of the bill:

A BILL

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to reinstate the uptick rule on short sales of securities.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT REQUIRED.

Within 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall--

(1) reinstate rule 10a-1 of the Commission’s rules (17 CFR 240.10a-1);

(2) rescind rule 201 of regulation SHO (17 CFR 242.201); and

(3) take such other actions as may be necessary to reinstate the price test restrictions that applied to short sales of securities prior to the Commission’s action in the proceeding entitled ‘Regulation SHO and Rule 10a-1’, adopted June 28, 2007 (Release No. 34-55970; File No. S7-21-06).

On January 27, 2009, Congressman Ackerman wrote a letter to the SEC urging them to restore the uptick rule.

“The best solution would be for the SEC to reinstate the uptick rule on its own” said Ackerman. “But if the agency fails to do so, Congress will force them to restore the regulation by passing our legislation.”

This is a bill to which all "longs" should immediately take the opportunity to write or email the aforementioned sponsors and your Representatives en masse and state your full support.

As traders are fully aware- the uptick rule's rescission in June 2007 contributed directly to short-sellers (including funds) being able to relentlessly "pin the bids" of stocks, such as financials- forcing stock prices lower and lower- causing massive damage to long investors. To date- shorts have conducted endless bear raids with impunity (and will continue to do so- unless and until the uptick rule is restored).

The fact that the uptick rule had not already been restored in the first place throughout the entire market crash- is downright absurd (and suspicious). Regardless, now there is finally a bill on the table...and it is every "long" trader's responsibility to do his or her part- and get Congress off its butt to finally do something relevant for the stock market. And the more the bill's sponsors and/or your Reps hear from you all- the better.

This is the time to help effect real change in D.C.

Contact Information:

Rep. Gary Ackerman [D-NY]-

Washington, DC
2243 Rayburn House Office Building
House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-2601
Fax: (202) 225-1589

Bayside Office
218-14 Northern Boulevard
Bayside, NY 11361
Phone: (718) 423-2154
Fax: (718) 423-5053

Write or Email your Representative here.

Keep track of how this proposed bill progresses (RSS Feed).

Let's roll...

GT McDuffy

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

How To Play The Mark-To-Market Suspension

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:30:00 +0000

As everyone following the financial markets knows- every time a "rumor" or "sound-byte" surfaces that the FASB 157 mark-to-market provision might be suspended (or modified), the stock market runs like the wind. Recently, for example, rumors led to a giant comeback rally in the financials and other sectors. And, on February 10, more mark-to-market rumors flew in after-hours in regard to a modification possibility to be included in the Obama Financial Stability Plan- and again, the market was stoked. The market rallied into, and through the next trading day as the "TARP Accountability" hearing limped onward.

TALF- good. TARP- not so good.

Democratic Representative and Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Barney Frank, recently said, "One of the things I think we should be exploring is the extent to which you can retain mark-to-market but make the consequences discretionary with the regulators rather than automatic."

There are several elements of the current "M2M" model which need to be resolved, rather than using the "one size fits all" rules under FASB 157: marking certain assets at maturity, marking assets trading in illiquid/liquid markets, marking assets in regard to a company's model and marking assets not easily "discovered," etc - to which, if modified/resolved, would help companies become truly transparent and potentially show many companies to be stronger, less underwater and in certain cases, no longer insolvent.

In the words of Congressman Paul E. Kanjorski (D-PA), Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises, he wants "to find a way – within the existing independent standard-setting structure – to still provide investors with the information needed to make effective decisions without continuing to impose undue burdens on financial institutions."

Furthermore, while the government is trying to figure it all out, including the public/private partnership, some have also recommended suspending M2M altogether.

There is nothing wrong with M2M bringing transparency to investors as to a company's financial position- but, true transparency has proved to be quite complicated (and unfair in many cases) in the real world.

The powerful Paul Volcker, former Fed Chairman, and now one of Obama's key advisors, is a big advocate for modifications of the current M2M.

On certain finance television channels, there are TV anchors (who have very limited or no economic cred) who have said that suspending or modifying M2M won't "do anything"- which, of course, is utterly ridiculous, so take them with a grain of salt. In fact, at very least, there will definitely be some "tweaks" made- which will be game changers in themselves.

The next potential mark-to-market rumor catalyst will come shortly when the House Financial Services Committee holds a hearing spotlighting the matter on March 12, 2009.

Also on the table with the SEC is the potential reinstatement of the uptick rule (or a modified version of it)- another major market-moving event.

Section 132 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 "Restates the Securities and Exchange Commission’s authority to suspend the application of Statement Number 157 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board if the SEC determines that it is in the public interest and protects investors."

Meantime, short-sellers have been pummeling financial stocks with utter impunity. Yet, in the front of every short-seller's mind (at least the smart ones), is the dread of a sudden announcement that mark-to-market has been suspended or modified- and causing a fast and furious short-covering stampede, in tandem with longs crashing into the financials with utter abandon.

This has to be causing shorts severe anxiety- eyes and ears glued to the news, fingers glued to the mouse, trade tickets already filled out- ready to cover-buy on a dime.

But what if an announcement comes overnight- or over a weekend, after the extended-trading session is over, or before the pre-market session begins? Could you imagine the sheer short-seller panic as they get caught with financials opening pre-market at something like a minimum of 20% higher- and then ratcheting up another 20% in the first minutes of trading?

So, how should longs and shorts play the strong possibility of a mark-to-market announcement coming any day now? Well, for one thing- it's probably not a good idea to be short overnight or over the weekend. And, longs would want to get in before after-hours closes, leading into the next trading day.

Of course, there are many shorts who are arrogant enough to believe that getting caught in a massive short-squeeze can never happen to them. Not with the media pundits trash-talking financials across the board. But- it is obvious that, if a mark-to-market rumor can cause a swift and large pop in the market- imagine what the real announcement will cause!

And, of course, as other details of the trillion dollar TALF come to the fore over the next few weeks- the markets will ultimately lock into incredibly bullish momentum...and not look back.

Longs don't want to get caught chasing financials once the announcement comes- not with all of that Big Money sitting impatiently in Treasuries and Money-Market funds collecting pennies- all suddenly piling into the equity markets for the long bull run. Bank stocks (C, MS, JPM, BAC, GS) and ETFs (XLF, UYG) are but a few of the beaten-down stocks that will be first out of the gate, leading the charge. Nothing worse than that sinking feeling longs get when they are kicking themselves for not getting in BEFORE the news hits the street.

So these are my St. Paddy's Day words of wisdom for all you traders:

If you are long on financials- hold your positions (and ride out any dips). Shorts- don't get caught short-squeezed overnight.

Be long. Be strong. And, be a champion...

Meantime- keep track of how proposed bill H.R. 607 ("To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue guidance on the interpretation of fair value accounting") progresses (RSS Feed).

Also- click here on March 12, 2009 to hear the HFSC mark-to-market hearing live.

GT McDuffy

(Disclosure: author holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in the article above)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

If I Were A Short-Seller: I'd Kill Myself

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:28:00 +0000

In Defense Of The SEC

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:53:00 +0000

It's far too easy to blame the SEC for the Bernie Madoff fiasco- or anything else. In fact, it's way too convenient. And, Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-N.Y.) today blaming the SEC for undermining the confidence Americans have in the financial markets is outrageous.

Mr. Ackerman. How dare you.

It is the SEC's job to investigate and enforce- yet they do so under, and within, the laws and regulations set forth by Congress. Period.

It is Congress that created and engendered FASB 157 "mark-to-market" accounting- which is primarily responsible for crashing the markets- and which led to the Republicans getting crushed in the elections. (And this is an entirely other sordid matter- which I call "FASB-gate"...Republicans are you listening?)

It is Congress that still does not insist on re-instating the "up-tick" rule- a rule that would not enable short-sellers to easily conduct bear raids on stocks and pound their stock prices into the pavement. This was also an important part of the market crash. In fact, it would even be a better idea to disallow shorting on the bid. And, with great foresight- the SEC has already published my idea on their website. It's been up there for almost 10 weeks. Have you Congressional lawmakers even seen it?

It is Congress that has allowed generations of Wall Street executives and lobbyists to operate, unchecked, within a culture of greed and arrogance- arrogance that allowed the monolithic investment firms to gamble with taxpayers' money and lose billions due to incompetent trading and reckless investment decisions- only to then have these same firms come running back to the same taxpayers to be bailed out- and using their insider proxies on the Hill to do so.

It is Congress that, to this day, has never provided the SEC with sufficient funding and manpower to be able to effectively investigate and enforce the markets.

It is Congress that set up the rules for the mortgage market- and let their own mortgage children, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, wield havoc within the mortgage industry right under their noses.

It is Congress that let hedge funds run wild, manipulating every market on the planet. And continue to do so.

It is Congress that failed to regulate the un-Godly dark world of the derivatives market.

It is Congress that seems to only tackle any or all of the above once it becomes politically-correct to placate their tax-paying constituents- and only seems to even begin making a legitimate attempt at it- if there is a "TV-op" attached in the process.

And, it is Congress which loves to grand-stand on national television before taxpayers and levy blame on everyone but themselves for what is wrong.

I feel sorry for the SEC. All these years, they have done the best they can with what they've had to work with. They've been strangled all the way.

Just once- I'd love to see Congressional representatives sitting where the SEC was sitting today- and grilled repeatedly for all of the incompetent "ambulance-chasing"-style law-making they have effected- and continue to effect.

This great country is great despite Congress. And can be greater, if just once, Congress could act before a crisis occurs- and not only after a crisis occurs.

Congress: instead of pointing fingers at everyone else- investigate and enforce yourselves.

The taxpayers demand it.

GT McDuffy

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

NovaDel Pharma: The Next Big Thing In Biopharma Microcaps

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:05:00 +0000

Novadel Pharma Inc.(NVD) recently received FDA approval of its Zolpimist™ (zolpidem tartrate) 5 mg and 10 mg Oral Spray.

Zolpimist™ is intended for the short-term treatment of insomnia characterized by difficulties with sleep initiation.

Zolpimist™ is now the second NovaDel product approved by the FDA that uses NovaDel’s proprietary NovaMist oral spray technology. Zolpimist™ contains the same active ingredient as Sanofi Aventis' Ambien®, the leading sedative hypnotic for the treatment of insomnia. Sanofi Anantis' patent for zolpidem tartrate expired on April 21, 2007, and the FDA subsequently approved the first generic versions of Ambien® (zolpidem tartrate) immediate-release tablets.

Mylan Pharmaceuticals (MYL), TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA (TEVA), Roxane Laboratories, Watson Laboratories, Ranbaxy Laboratories, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Apotex, Synthon Pharmaceuticals, Genpharm, Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Carlsbad Technology, and Lek Pharmaceuticals were the 13 companies approved by the FDA to manufacture generic immediate-release tablets.

So, the December 22, 2008 announcement that the FDA approved NovaDel's oral spray version now puts NovaDel in powerful company. And, Novadel's Zolpimist™ should be a big hit amongst insomnia drug consumers.

NovaDel is currently engaged in commercializing Zolpimist™, which will surely attract big pharma partners. Additionally, NovaDel is currently finalizing commercialization plans for NitroMist™ - which was their first FDA approval. NitroMist™ offers acute relief for heart and coronary artery disease (acute relief of an attack or acute prophylaxis of angina pectoris due to coronary artery disease).

Furthermore, NovaDel is also involved in looking to ultimately enterprise an oral-spray version of a generic form of Pfizer's Viagra® (active ingredient: sildenafil), something that Pfizer (PFE) itself has already been looking into doing. To this end, it therefore may make sense for Pfizer to hook-up with NovaDel. There had previously been rumors of the two teaming together, which both companies denied at the time, but, with NovaDel's star power now rising- and with Pfizer, now more than ever, looking to partner up with companies big and small- the Novadel dance could, indeed, be viable.

In the world of biopharma microcaps- a world in which there seems to be a small company on every street corner looking to strike it big and rich with just the right pharma product, NovaDel certainly stands out from the pack. That's not to say that there aren't a few others, but NovaDel is clearly onto something with their "oral-spray version of big name drug" niche.

And it will not be long before big pharma comes calling- especially now that the FDA has firmly accepted NovaDel into their brotherhood- which as every biopharma/biotech investor knows, is an incredibly impossible thing to do. And NovaDel did it.

Novadel has graduated to the major leagues. And this small company out of Flemington, NJ is poised for big things. In fact, given all the recent and emerging developments surrounding the strong NovaDel drug pipeline, I wouldn't be at all surprised if a major pharmaceutical comes along and simply buys out NovaDel Pharma lock, stock 'n "oral-spray" barrel.

(GT McDuffy does not hold any positions in NovaDel Pharma Inc.)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

The Monthly Big 5: Stocks To Watch

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:16:00 +0000

February 2009

NovaDel Pharma (NVD): Company recently received FDA approval for its Zolpimist™ 5 mg and 10 mg Oral Spray. NovaDel is currently engaged in commercializing Zolpimist™, which will surely attract big pharma partners. Additionally, NovaDel is currently finalizing commercialization plans for NitroMist™ - which was their first FDA approval. Logic dictates that, with two FDA approvals now under their belt, NovaDel's niche in offering oral spray versions of big name drugs that are currently available in tablet (or non-spray) form- is a bonafide and potentially very-lucrative market. Particularly interesting at this point in time for companies such as NovaDel Pharma, is recent M&A activity from large pharmaceuticals looking to partner up big and small. EDGAR filings, just reported (February 2 and 3), are extremely interesting as well.

GTC Biotherapeutics (GTCB): Company is awaiting approval from the FDA per its transgenic goat-based ATryn® drug. In an historic move, an FDA advisory committee recently endorsed the drug. The FDA decision is due by February 7, 2009. Pharma drugs made from/with genetically-engineered animals is a hot topic, and related final guidelines from the FDA have recently been issued- in anticipation of the Obama administration's pro-stem cell agenda.

Las Vegas Sands (LVS): Casino sector has recently sold-off in tandem with some negative sentiment amongst a few Wall Streeters, however, LVS is now oversold- and with its 20% short-interest squeezing into the coming February broad market rally- this stock is poised to run like mad. Stock came down from a January 6, 2009 high of $9.15 all the way to a low today of $3.89. 52 Week High: $95.26!

Tenet Healthcare (THC): Company has just received a few analyst upgrades- and the stock price has pulled down from a January 9, 2009 high of $1.49 to a close of $1.07 today. As with LVS, this stock can rally 30-40% in a flash with a broad market pop.

Alkermes Inc. (ALKS): Company, fresh off a January 20, 2009 JP Morgan "highest-score" upgrade, has also attracted a lot of other Wall Street proponents. Particularly as healthcare and bio pharma stocks are in favor per defensive strategies in a weak stock market in conjunction with President Obama's healthcare and stem cell pedal-to-the-metal agendas. Company boasts such partners as Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), who are also awaiting an FDA decision due by Valentine's Day 2009 in regard to an sNDA for Rispredal Consta™- an adult bipolar disorder treatment (say that 5 times fast)!

GT McDuffy

(None of the above stocks are recommendations to buy or sell. The author has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this article).

Subscribe (free) To: The McDuffy Report

More Blogs From GT McDuffy

Buy American- And Let's Make Canada Our 51st State

noreply@blogger.com (..............) — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:07:00 +0000

So, at this year's annual World Economic Forum meeting in Switzerland, the United States trumped up the "Buy American" dogma. Canadian Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty, responded by pronouncing that American "protectionism" would be "met by resistance" by countries around the globe- but that Canada would not effect trade restrictions of its own.

After all, why should Canada stand in the way? They are the number one trading partner of this United States.

Although other countries fear the latest US evolution in its trade policy, Canada does not. And, it's all good- we need them. They need us. They ARE us. We are one and the same. Keep reading.

And, therefore, I say- let's get this charade out of the way already- and officially make Canada our 51st State.

Seems outrageous doesn't it?

I know. I know.
Hate me today. But, love me tomorrow, eh?

But, in an overwhelming variety of ways- it makes a lot more sense than you might think.

Canada, that Great-White land mass due north of the United States contains, quite possibly, the richest body of natural resources in the world- iron ore, nickel, zinc, copper, gold, lead, molybdenum, potash, diamonds, silver, fish, timber, wildlife, coal, petroleum, natural gas and hydro-electric power.

Canadian-based companies such as Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ), Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX) and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Inc (POT) are just a few of Canada's major players in the global resource boom of recent years.

Yet, as of 2008, there were only 33 million Canucks living in a surface area of 3.85 million square miles- or roughly 5.4 people per square mile of arable land- which is ranked 166th out of 168 of the world's arable countries. All those resources- and so few people. Sounds suspicious. Where's all that money going? All Canadians must be rich. No? Or maybe just a handful have all the dough- and the rest go to hockey games with flasks of wine and beer, wondering the same thing.

Anyways, let's face it- the only way you can tell Canadians apart from Americans is if you listen to the accent- and, you know we Americans love to make fun of it. But, it's not unlike Sarah Palin having bred children, don't ya know, in Fargo, North Dakota.

So, hey- let's not throw stones.

And, of course, Canadians grow up wanting to be Americans. They watch exactly the same television shows as us on US-affiliated Canadian networks. They supply us with an endless star-studded list of talent- from Jim Carey, Mike Meyers and Howie Mandel on the comedic side (all of whom, when they had the chance, took the first American-bound bus out of Canada they could find), to K.D. Lang, Celine Dion and Sarah McLachlan on the singing side.

And- as, everyone knows- Captain Kirk is Canadian.

On an economic basis- Canada's gigantic resources would offer the USA an incredible, indescribable boost. The United States, in fact, is already the major importer of Canadian resources. Suffice to say, the U.S has become entirely dependent on Canadian oil. We import nearly $5 billion worth of steel and iron from the North. The combined resources of the two countries would offer all types of industries a seemingly endless backstop of supply. Whether for internal use, or for export.

Indeed, there is enough oil in all that Canadian shale to last us oil-addicted Americans several lifetimes- and then some. Plus- we wouldn't have to go digging in the near-term, certainly, for our own vast 3 trillion barrel shale deposits buried under Colorado, Utah and Wyoming- so U.S. environmentalists might smile a bit the next time Senator Orrin Hatch gurgles about trofting the Rockies (although, of course, oil shale extraction is definitely not green).

I mean- at least in Canada- mostly all their oil shale can be found in the tar sand boonies of those pitless-wonders, Saskatchewan and Alberta.

Of course, from a security stand-point- merging Canada into the United States effectively eliminates one giant coast-to-coast border: a border which scoundrels have used for years to enter into our country; all they've had to do is fly into Canada and then sneak over the vast porous border into the U.S. If Canada became part of the United States- security could be greatly enhanced, especially by only allowing international flights into Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.

You know- I'm not alone in wanting to grab a big piece of Canada as an investment in our future. China, over the last several years, has been steadily, stealthily and methodically buying up Canada right behind our backs.

And, China's Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. reportedly recently made a play to buy Canadian telcom equipment giant Nortel Networks (NT)- all of it. The entire company- which is now in chapter 11 bankruptcy. This, even though in March 2008, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) had previously nixed Huawei's desires to buy a 16.5% stake in Massachusetts-based, 3Com Corp. (COMS) citing national security concerns. It makes no sense, either from an economic, or a security point-of-view, to let China keep doing what they're doing unabated. In fact, it is outrageous that this has been going on up in Canada- in our own backyard. What are you Canadians thinking???

In 2002, Leger Marketing of Montreal polled Americans about annexing Canada to the United States, and roughly 40% said they would be in favor it. 49% disagreed. In September 2001, Leger had done a similar poll of Canadians- and, in regard to Canada being annexed by the USA, only 20% of Canadians agreed. In fact, 76.5% rejected the idea! And there have been similar polls conducted over the years. Seems like the same results. A strong minority of Americans favor it. And the strong majority of Canadians firmly reject the idea.

Hmmn. Sounds to me like Canadians need some more prodding. Are you Ontario Loyalists still bitter about what happened in 1776? Are you French Canadians still hanging your chapeaux on trying to separate altogether from Canada and becoming your own country- OUI or NON? "Je me souviens?" -don't make me laugh...

Time to get over it. We need each other. For economic and security reasons, to name just two. Is there really even a Canadian "identity," in the first place, in which to vest any nationalistic pride whatsoever?

No. That went out the window when Pierre Trudeau went to Harvard.

So I say- let's make you Canadians an offer.

"We'll make you our 51st State." And you say, "Sure- what a great idea. We're one and the same, anyways. Thought you'd never ask!"

GT McDuffy

(The author holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this article)

Subscribe To: The McDuffy Report (free)

More Blogs From GT McDuffy