<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980</id><updated>2009-02-20T23:49:13.184-05:00</updated><title type="text">A Pilgrim's Digression</title><subtitle type="html">Essays on politics and culture</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>148</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/iGEh" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site, subject to copyright and fair use.</feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-112783953784609356</id><published>2005-09-27T12:36:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-09-27T12:47:09.396-04:00</updated><title type="text">It's alive!  It's alive!</title><summary type="text">My blog at sodsbrood.com has been resurrected from the dead, twice no less.  After some more prodding of administrators via the site5 forums, my site was finally unlocked last night around eight o'clock.  Within ten minutes, I had promptly, but accidentally, deleted the entire directory where my blog is stored, blog and all.That deletion has to rank up there with the most stupid things a man has </summary><link rel="related" href="http://sodsbrood.com/pilgrim" title="It's alive!  It's alive!" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/112783953784609356/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=112783953784609356" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/112783953784609356" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/112783953784609356" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2005/09/its-alive-its-alive.html" title="It's alive!  It's alive!" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-112773583776678337</id><published>2005-09-26T07:35:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-09-26T07:57:18.886-04:00</updated><title type="text">Where have all the blog posts gone?</title><summary type="text">On Friday, exactly seven days after my blog went dark, I finally had an email from technical support, from the same person who emailed originally to say the directory where my blog lives was being locked.  Short and sweet, the email said that the directory could be unlocked if I could tell them what applications and scripts I was running.  That I did.  A profound silence ensued, and the blog </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/112773583776678337/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=112773583776678337" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/112773583776678337" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/112773583776678337" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2005/09/where-have-all-blog-posts-gone.html" title="Where have all the blog posts gone?" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-112748076169049890</id><published>2005-09-23T08:50:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-09-23T09:08:05.583-04:00</updated><title type="text">Times Select</title><summary type="text">Among other items I would have blogged about this week, if my stream of patter hadn't been interrupted with technical problems, was the introduction of the New York Times  "Times Select."  Otherwise known as yet another attempt by newspapers to start charging for what they have been giving us for free for nearly ten years.I was slightly annoyed on Wednesday to discover that I could not read </summary><link rel="related" href="http://www.nytimes.com/products/timesselect/whatis.html" title="Times Select" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/112748076169049890/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=112748076169049890" title="6 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/112748076169049890" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/112748076169049890" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2005/09/times-select.html" title="Times Select" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-112739297116168749</id><published>2005-09-22T08:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-09-22T08:52:16.740-04:00</updated><title type="text">Technical Difficulties</title><summary type="text">The experiment at sodsbrood may be over, at least for me, anyway.  I have been locked out of my blog since last Friday, and as another Friday is fast approaching, I have to consider that I may never post at sodsbrood again.My technical difficulties began sometime late in the afternoon on Friday the sixteenth.  My friend, an administrator of sodsbrood, sent me an email he had received from the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/112739297116168749/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=112739297116168749" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/112739297116168749" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/112739297116168749" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2005/09/technical-difficulties.html" title="Technical Difficulties" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109863516289596979</id><published>2004-10-24T11:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-24T16:51:54.193-04:00</updated><title type="text">Work in transition</title><summary type="text">This may be my last post here at my blogger site.  I recently joined a group of friends, acquaintances, and strangers in founding a communal website at sodsbrood.com.  It is founded in the spirit of other literary and social communes through history, from the seventeenth century to the modern era.  An interest of mine in Graduate school was the radical Christian and political reform movements of </summary><link rel="related" href="http://sodsbrood.com/pilgrim" title="Work in transition" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109863516289596979/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109863516289596979" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109863516289596979" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109863516289596979" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/work-in-transition.html" title="Work in transition" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109855219633313980</id><published>2004-10-23T13:21:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-23T13:34:38.950-04:00</updated><title type="text">Selling the candidate</title><summary type="text">In the spirit of digression and disjuncture which seems to characterize my posts today, I wish to comment on some of the ads I've seen in these final days of the campaign.  Last week I saw one for Kerry that I thought absolutely brilliant.  It was not an ad designed by the Kerry campaign; it was designed by Rob Reiner for MoveOn, and it is perhaps the best ad this season.  You can download the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109855219633313980/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109855219633313980" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109855219633313980" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109855219633313980" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/selling-candidate.html" title="Selling the candidate" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109854779157954094</id><published>2004-10-23T11:43:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-23T13:21:45.996-04:00</updated><title type="text">Winding down: 10 days to go</title><summary type="text">Despite the frenzy that the candidates themselves feel in the final days of an election, these last two weeks always seem to me to be the quietest.  Everyone I meet has already made up their mind and are for the most part tuning out the news and election coverage.  Much of the campaigning, and almost all of the reporting, has turned negative anyway, as it aways does this time in the season.

I </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109854779157954094/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109854779157954094" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109854779157954094" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109854779157954094" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/winding-down-10-days-to-go.html" title="Winding down: 10 days to go" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109827518219981332</id><published>2004-10-20T08:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-21T16:23:20.686-04:00</updated><title type="text">Christ's Mouthpiece Speaks!</title><summary type="text">Pat Robertson was on Paula Zahn's CNN program last night.  He had some pretty outrageous things to say, as usual, including the claim that he warned President Bush there would be casualties in the war in Iraq, and that Bush responded with confidence that he did not believe there would be any."And I warned him about this war. I had deep misgivings about this war, deep misgivings. And I was trying </summary><link rel="related" href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/19/robertson.bush.iraq/index.html" title="Christ's Mouthpiece Speaks!" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109827518219981332/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109827518219981332" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109827518219981332" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109827518219981332" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/christs-mouthpiece-speaks.html" title="Christ's Mouthpiece Speaks!" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109822011026966613</id><published>2004-10-19T16:54:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-19T17:10:58.906-04:00</updated><title type="text">Nobody better say nuttin' bout Ted Koppel</title><summary type="text">Jon Stewart's Friday appearance on CNN's lame "Crossfire" show has generated lots of mixed press for Stewart.  Happily, you, too, can watch the entire segment on-line.  Considering that "Crossfire" is broadcast at 4:30 in the afternoon, at a time when only housewives and felons under house arrest are at home, it seems likely most people without TiVo will be viewing the segment online.  Stewart's </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109822011026966613/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109822011026966613" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109822011026966613" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109822011026966613" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/nobody-better-say-nuttin-bout-ted.html" title="Nobody better say nuttin' bout Ted Koppel" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109821690722378201</id><published>2004-10-19T14:52:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-19T16:20:27.120-04:00</updated><title type="text">Slouching towards Bethlehem</title><summary type="text">Lately, the newspapers are full of frank foreboding about how and when Election 2004 is going to be decided this year.  Litigiousness looms as the incalculable determining factor in the election.

Among the pundit class, conservatives seem to be the most worried about a close election and the possibility of a run-off in the courts.  For MSNBC today, George Will writes about the Dooomsday Scenario</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109821690722378201/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109821690722378201" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109821690722378201" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109821690722378201" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/slouching-towards-bethlehem.html" title="Slouching towards Bethlehem" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109820307192684782</id><published>2004-10-19T13:24:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-19T13:40:07.526-04:00</updated><title type="text">You know I can't sleep, I can't stop my brain</title><summary type="text">I'm so tired.  I slept badly last night.  A couple nights a week now, this happens.  If it happens on the weekend, it's not so bad because I can stay abed longer, dozing away the morning, or even sleeping deeply if I have finally sunk into somnolence.  This morning, however, I gave it up at four-thirty and rose to get ready for work, after a night of wakefulness.

I have blamed my insomnia on </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109820307192684782/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109820307192684782" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109820307192684782" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109820307192684782" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/you-know-i-cant-sleep-i-cant-stop-my.html" title="You know I can't sleep, I can't stop my brain" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109813058959398092</id><published>2004-10-18T15:53:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-18T16:16:29.593-04:00</updated><title type="text">The brave little tailor</title><summary type="text">At the risk of prolonging a story that, like an obnoxious, drunk party guest, refuses to go away, take a look at what Bush's campaign advisor said yesterday in response to a Tim Russert question about "Bush's bulge."

The exchange is actually a three way between Russert, Ken Mehlman (the Bush advisor), and Bob Shrum, Kerry's campaign advisor.MR. RUSSERT:  Before we go, Mr. Mehlman, clear up this </summary><link rel="related" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6267835/" title="The brave little tailor" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109813058959398092/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109813058959398092" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109813058959398092" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109813058959398092" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/brave-little-tailor.html" title="The brave little tailor" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109812077883195163</id><published>2004-10-18T13:34:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-18T13:51:51.003-04:00</updated><title type="text">My vote for the Tin Man</title><summary type="text">This week's New Yorker is an all-politics issue, so I am in Heaven on my daily commute to and from work.  There is an article in it about John Zogby.  You may remember last week I wrote here about a question in a recent Zogby poll.  For whom would you vote, the Tin Man or the Scarecrow, in an election for the President of Oz?

Several weeks ago, I signed up to take the Zogby on-line polls, and </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109812077883195163/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109812077883195163" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109812077883195163" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109812077883195163" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/my-vote-for-tin-man.html" title="My vote for the Tin Man" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109810243010331712</id><published>2004-10-18T06:40:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-18T09:27:27.613-04:00</updated><title type="text">It's all downhill</title><summary type="text">The last two weeks of an election cycle always seem to draw out both the best and worst characteristics of candidates for office.  Mostly we see only the worst.  I don't know if it is because the candidates begin to get a little panicky when they don't have a clear lead in the polls, or if its because their campaign team saves its dirtiest tricks for the bitter end.  Maybe it's a little of both.
</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109810243010331712/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109810243010331712" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109810243010331712" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109810243010331712" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/its-all-downhill.html" title="It's all downhill" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109778796516851823</id><published>2004-10-14T17:06:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-14T17:25:57.036-04:00</updated><title type="text">Final ramblings about the debate</title><summary type="text">After the debate last night, my wife said, "I sort of feel sorry for Bush."  I said, "Don't feel sorry for him until November 3rd."

My wife said she felt that at the end of the debate, after Bush had calmed the almost manic disposition he had displayed all night, he finally came across as at ease and likable.  His sense of humor is self-deprecating, which makes it hard to blame him for faults he</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109778796516851823/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109778796516851823" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109778796516851823" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109778796516851823" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/final-ramblings-about-debate.html" title="Final ramblings about the debate" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109770286442072365</id><published>2004-10-14T06:30:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-14T09:20:40.686-04:00</updated><title type="text">The religion question</title><summary type="text">Finally last night, John Kerry had a few words to say about his religious faith.

To millions of Americans like myself who have made the decision to vote for John Kerry, or are leaning that way, there is no more important issue than the question of John Kerry's faith and what it means to him.  It has increased in importance in my mind as Kerry has remained resolutely silent on the matter.  Indeed</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109770286442072365/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109770286442072365" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109770286442072365" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109770286442072365" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/religion-question.html" title="The religion question" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109768570478760904</id><published>2004-10-13T13:36:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-18T08:50:57.943-04:00</updated><title type="text">Defending "Alexander"</title><summary type="text">Oliver Stone has done an interview with Playboy in which he defends his newest film from charges that the gay sex in it is too explicit.  He also has a few words to say about the election.The highly political Stone also discusses the presidential candidates in the interview, which hits newsstands later this week. Speaking of John Kerry, who was a senior at Yale when he was a freshman, Stone says:</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109768570478760904/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109768570478760904" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109768570478760904" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109768570478760904" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/defending-alexander_13.html" title="Defending &quot;Alexander&quot;" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109767138067336581</id><published>2004-10-13T07:30:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-18T08:49:24.200-04:00</updated><title type="text">Kerry's October beginning to look like August</title><summary type="text">Queen Elizabeth the First is reputed to have said that the past cannot be cured; and like some terrible disease, John Kerry's past keeps relapsing at the most inopportune times.  There seems no cure for it.

Last night, I was watching Special Report with Brit Hume and his clan of Talking Heads on Fox, and the subject on the table was John Kerry's anti-war actions following his return from Vietnam</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109767138067336581/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109767138067336581" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109767138067336581" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109767138067336581" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/kerrys-october-beginning-to-look-like.html" title="Kerry's October beginning to look like August" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109758654939283105</id><published>2004-10-12T13:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-13T07:30:30.640-04:00</updated><title type="text">Bush forgets he owns a tree growing company</title><summary type="text">FactCheck.org Distortions galore at second Presidential debate

Apparently, Bush does indeed own a timber company.Kerry: The president got $84 from a timber company that he owns, and he's counted as a small business. Dick Cheney's counted as a small business.  That's how they do things. That's just not right.

Bush: I own a timber company?  That's news to me.

(LAUGHTER)

Bush's Timber-Growing </summary><link rel="related" href="http://factcheck.org/article275.html" title="Bush forgets he owns a tree growing company" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109758654939283105/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109758654939283105" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109758654939283105" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109758654939283105" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/bush-forgets-he-owns-tree-growing.html" title="Bush forgets he owns a tree growing company" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109758297252386121</id><published>2004-10-12T08:03:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-12T14:44:48.200-04:00</updated><title type="text">A question from the most recent Zogby poll</title><summary type="text">For whom would you more likely vote for president - the Tin Man, who is all brains and no heart or the Scarecrow, who is all heart and no brain?

I voted for the Tin Man.  But what about the Cowardly Lion, who was all fear and no courage?  Or even the Wicked Witch of the West, who was, well, wicked?  Surely she has some redeeming feature, even if it be only her crystal ball in which she might </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109758297252386121/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109758297252386121" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109758297252386121" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109758297252386121" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/question-from-most-recent-zogby-poll.html" title="A question from the most recent Zogby poll" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109750330581312737</id><published>2004-10-11T09:42:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-11T10:05:04.263-04:00</updated><title type="text">War of words</title><summary type="text">I sometimes wonder how and why a story enters the news cycle.  CNN.com is reporting a story about a Bush campaign ad that has not aired yet, but which is based on a Kerry quote (perhaps taken out of context) from a New York Times Magazine interview.

What exactly is newsworthy about this?  Is it newsworthy because it is so egregious an example of demagoguery?  Or is it newsworthy because CNN </summary><link rel="related" href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/10/bush.kerry.terror/index.html" title="War of words" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109750330581312737/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109750330581312737" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109750330581312737" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109750330581312737" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/war-of-words.html" title="War of words" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109750186592825647</id><published>2004-10-11T09:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-11T09:42:09.726-04:00</updated><title type="text">Late, but not too late</title><summary type="text">Today is Columbus Day, if that matters to anyone who is not a Federal employee.  My son is in school, my wife at work, as I suspect every other adult is as well.  I am surprised some upstart crow of a congressman has not proposed doing away with this racist, colonialist holiday as a way of promoting himself.

We went away for the weekend, so I did not have a chance to comment on the second debate</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109750186592825647/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109750186592825647" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109750186592825647" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109750186592825647" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/late-but-not-too-late.html" title="Late, but not too late" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109717381902236824</id><published>2004-10-07T14:30:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-07T14:38:25.130-04:00</updated><title type="text">Is Bush Wired?: The Voice in Bush's Ear</title><summary type="text">Is Bush Wired?: The Voice in Bush's Ear

Conspiracy theories abound on-line.  I read in the Washington Post this morning a story about a flash video popular on the Internet that supposedly illustrates the contention that the strike on the Pentagon on 9/11 was not a strike by terrorists, but by our own government.  The article is titled Conspiracy Theories Flourish on the Internet.  The theory's </summary><link rel="related" href="http://isbushwired.com/2004/10/voice-in-bushs-ear.html#comments" title="Is Bush Wired?: The Voice in Bush's Ear" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109717381902236824/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109717381902236824" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109717381902236824" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109717381902236824" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/is-bush-wired-voice-in-bushs-ear.html" title="Is Bush Wired?: The Voice in Bush's Ear" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109715830428299688</id><published>2004-10-07T10:11:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-07T10:11:44.283-04:00</updated><title type="text">Robert Novak: No victory in Iraq</title><summary type="text">Robert Novak: No victory in Iraq

Despite being a Republican Party lapdog, Robert Novak has twice now puked on the GOP rug in two columns in about as many weeks.  Presuming Novak is correct in this article and his previous article of September 20, the Bush Administration plans to cut our losses and exit Iraq after the elections in January.

I think that is exactly what we need to do, but it </summary><link rel="related" href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/rn20041007.shtml" title="Robert Novak: No victory in Iraq" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109715830428299688/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109715830428299688" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109715830428299688" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109715830428299688" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/robert-novak-no-victory-in-iraq.html" title="Robert Novak: No victory in Iraq" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5207980.post-109708407701329250</id><published>2004-10-06T13:34:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-10-07T08:22:57.953-04:00</updated><title type="text">Report Discounts Iraqi Arms Threat (washingtonpost.com)</title><summary type="text">Report Discounts Iraqi Arms Threat (washingtonpost.com)

One has to ask, is there a point at which the bad news for the Bush Administration actually starts to affect the President's approval ratings and reelect numbers?  Or conversely, is there a point at which the news is so consistently bad that people just shrug and stubbornly refuse to acknowledge it, rather like the President himself?

The </summary><link rel="related" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9790-2004Oct5.html" title="Report Discounts Iraqi Arms Threat (washingtonpost.com)" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/feeds/109708407701329250/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5207980&amp;postID=109708407701329250" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109708407701329250" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5207980/posts/default/109708407701329250" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pylgryme.blogspot.com/2004/10/report-discounts-iraqi-arms-threat.html" title="Report Discounts Iraqi Arms Threat (washingtonpost.com)" /><author><name>Matthew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06623287283750399460</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="07668286891117899589" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total></entry></feed>
