Literary Musings ...

Shattering the Pristine Mirror | From Turgenev’s Maiden to Sexton’s Madwoman ❤️

2026-11-09T20:58:00.000+05:30

Why did Anne Sexton Shatter Turgenev’s Mirror?

First, a little disclaimer before we begin,

Then onto the post and the musings within! 😊

Turgenev’s Maiden and Sexton’s Madwoman

9th November

#onhisbirthdaytoday #onherbirthdaytoday

The Disclaimer: The views, literary analogies, and theoretical allusions expressed in this post are purely literary musings painted on ‘imaginative habitations’, and hence they are not meant to be taken in strict letter and in spirit! This is a special public service announcement for my II MA students especially - please do not cite my midnight epiphanies of this kind, verbatim in your Critical Theory exam the day after tomorrow and expect grace marks! 😊 As such, consider this space as a purely imaginative habitation for an open discussion, and not a legally binding syllabus or a substitute for reading your actual prescribed texts. Read, reflect, and yes… be courageous enough to shatter your own mirrors!

Now onto the Post and the Musings –

Well, two great literary legends were born today.

Ivan Turgenev in Russia and Anne Sexton in America.

Ivan Turgenev could be called the first internationally celebrated Russian writer who got widespread fame and critical acclaim all across the world in general, and Western Europe in particular.

And that’s also because, (like Pearl S Buck or Doris Lessing, or Jawaharlal Nehru, or M. K. Gandhi or R. K. Narayan) he lived much of his adult life abroad – especially in Germany and in France – and hence served as a cultural mediator between Russia and the West.

He is particularly known for defining the concept of the ‘superfluous man’ in Russian literature.

[On an aside, it was Alexander Pushkin, who in his “novel in verse” titled, Eugene Onegin, envisioned such a character (the superfluous man)! A character who was a highly cynical, highly educated aristocrat - highly bored with society, highly detached, and highly incapable of engaging in meaningful work or relationships with anyone!]

Althought Pushkin envisioned such a character, he never actually used the exact phrase “superfluous man” anywhere in the book. It was Ivan Turgenev who officially coined the label decades later in his 1850 novella, The Diary of a Superfluous Man.

He had expanded this archetype (of the Superfluous Man) from an aristocratic, romantic, cynical wanderer into a tragic reflection of the 1840s Russian intelligentsia!

So who is the Russian Intelligentsia?

Well, the Russian intelligentsia can be defined in simple terms, by contrasting them with the aristocrats.

The aristocracy, the autocracy and the bureaucracy had all the money, the land, and the political control with them. However, the Russian intelligentsia, had the education but zero power. In other words, they were armed with highly progressive university education but unfortunately they were completely locked out of political power by the Tsarist autocracy. This profound alienation resulted in radicalism, despair, and the “Superfluous Man” syndrome of the era.

In short, the Superfluous Men were Russian intelligentsia who were paralysed by over-education and were entirely incapable of turning their progressive education into real, concrete action.

Quite interestingly, Turgenev also pioneered yet another engaging archetype in Russian literature - the intellectually independent, morally pure, and resolute young woman, dubbed the Turgenev maiden!

And that’s were this blogpost really starts! 😊

This can be seen in his characterisation of Elena in his 1859 novel titled, On the Eve or Anna Odintsova in his 1862 novel titled, Fathers and Sons that depict women who possess a quiet, unyielding strength - a strength that consistently eclipses the indecisive, philosophising men all around them.

In a way… yes… in a way… the Turgenev Maiden is unique in the realm of 19th century literature, because, it was a time when much of European literature was busy depicting their female leads or heroines as women waiting to be saved by brave and dynamic men. Hence, the Turgenev Maiden, conceptualised by Turgenev was a welcome relief from the ‘stereotypical’ portrayal of the century.

This brings us to Anne Sexton, the birthday girl today - and her poetic personas – especially the “Mad Housewife” and the “Witch” archetype!

Well, Sexton’s “Mad Housewife” was quite an explosive contribution to the mid 20th century’s literary (and feminist) perspectives on what Spivak would call, coercive gender stereotypes!

In fact, Sexton did a stunning, path-breaking manoeuvre of sorts! She turned the ‘safety’ and ‘domesticity’ of the home into a site of psychological trauma. Be it the kitchen, the ironing board, or the marital bed – they were all conceptualised as spaces of suffocation and trauma.

In addition, she was bold enough (for her time!) to embrace the “Witch” archetype, as she strongly felt that, the concept of ‘Witch’ has historically been a patriarchal archetype - a label used to police, to silence, and to execute women who stepped outside acceptable (patriarchal) bounds.

For example, in her poem titled, “Her Kind”, her speaker does not defend herself against the accusation of being a witch; she boldly embraces it. She identifies with the outcast, the possessed, and the misunderstood (“I have been her kind”).

Her Kind

By Anne Sexton

I have gone out, a possessed witch,

haunting the black air, braver at night;

dreaming evil, I have done my hitch

over the plain houses, light by light:

lonely thing, twelve-fingered, out of mind.

A woman like that is not a woman, quite.

I have been her kind.

In this poem, the refrain “I have been her kind” is a radical and bold act of claiming the identity of the outcast (witch) as a badge of honour and a source of camaraderie and kinship with other women. (I have been her kind!)

Thus far, we had a look into Turgenev’s depiction of his maidens, and Sexton’s portrayal of her women as well.

Now, let’s bring Susan Sellers into the picture! 😊

A Russian writer (Turgenev), and an American writer (Sexton) lend themselves to critical interpretation by a British feminist (Susan Sellers), who waxes eloquent on French feminism (Cixous)! 😊

But before we proceed, a word about Susan Sellers would do a whole world of good here.

I know that my II MA Students are going to write their End-of-Semester Examination on the paper titled, ‘Critical Theory’, in two days, wherein Susan Sellers finds a space as well! 😊

Interestingly, Susan Sellers was someone (akin to Ivan Turgenev), who acted as a cultural mediator between France and Britain and of course the rest-of-the-literary-world!

Professor Susan Sellers – while doing her Masters in Sorbonne in Paris, focusing on Literary Theory and Feminist Thought, got the opportunity to work directly with a lot of pioneering French feminist philosophers, especially with Hélène Cixous, with whom she formed a long-lasting friendship.

The “comparativa” “impy” nymph in me indeed tempts me to a tee, trying to make another startling analogy –

Sellers is to Cixous what Spivak is to Derrida! 😊

The comparisons are so striking, aren’t they?

Bespeaks to the power of good translators who envision their noble role in making the aura of a foreign country’s theories appealing and convincing to their own people!

Here, again, the translator becomes a cultural mediator of sorts!

Interestingly, both Spivak and Sellers were not passive translators but “massive” translators!

When Spivak translated Derrida’s Of Grammatology into English in 1976, she was able to make a highly dense and intense text very easily understandable for English-speaking scholars. Sellers did the exact same thing for Hélène Cixous in the late 1980s!

In fact, translating Cixous into English was a great challenge for Sellers. It was “an exceptionally difficult academic undertaking”, as she herself admits, to translate Cixous’s concept of écriture féminine (writing the body)!

Yes, “Writing the Body!”

The concept of “Writing the Body” was something quite exciting to Sellers. She felt that, this concept indeed provided the perfect and exact theoretical vocabulary needed to analyse “how women write”, and how women “create” art and literature.

And that’s exactly the point I’m trying to make through this blogpost.

So yes! there is indeed a sharp and a stark contrast between Turgenev’s “idealised maiden” and Sexton’s “transgressive housewife!”

Ain’t it?

Well, and this, according to Susan Sellers, is tied to their respective genders! (Bring in Judith Butler, or even Beauvoir here, if you may!)

Sellers has always been a staunch supporter of women “writing”, nay “creating” their own literary language!

And why-o-why does she support that?

That’s because she argues that male-authored texts have always historically “trapped” women into highly coercive gender stereotypes, and constructs, to serve their own psychological or selfish needs.

In that sense, Turgenev’s maiden, (despite her moral superiority), is indeed, a classic patriarchal myth - the “selfless” saviour. Moreover, she is permitted to be strong only because she remains pure, self-sacrificing, and ultimately non-threatening to the patriarchal order. As such, she is the object of male ‘portrayals’ and NOT the subject of her own lived reality or embodied subjectivity!

To Susan Sellers, the concept of “good” or “strong” women are almost always visualised and conceptualised only within male-demarcated frameworks!

That’s hence Sellers advocates the concept of écriture feminine – “writing the female body” from the woman’s felt-experience and embodied subjectivity, in order to disrupt male-dominated language and reclaim female agency.

Turgenev creates female characters who are aesthetically balanced and visually spotless, reflecting a male gaze. However, Sexton’s personas are born from first-hand visceral, bodily reality – the reality of menstruation, abortion, psychiatric wards, and domestic exhaustion.

If Turgenev gave narrative agency to his ‘maiden’, Sexton reclaims female agency for her ‘witches’ and ‘madwomen’.

To put it in a nutshell –

Turgenev spends the entire 19th century polishing a pristine “mirror” (reminded of Sylvia Plath?) that “reflects” authentic ‘female experience’, and then Sexton comes and claims that she wants the ‘pristine mirror’ destroyed completely, in order to reclaim true female agency! 😊

Now for a few lovely quotes from Anne Sexton to wrap up this blogpost, quotes I thought you’d so love reading – 😊

“As it has been said:

Love and a cough

cannot be concealed.

Even a small cough.

Even a small love.”

“It doesn't matter who my father was; it matters who I remember he was.”

“The joy that isn't shared dies young.”

“Don't bite till you know if it's bread or stone.”

“God owns heaven but He craves the earth.”

“I don’t care, I love you anyhow. It is too late to turn you out of my heart. Part of you lives here.”

“How you choose to lose yourself matters. Trust me, it’s all in the ‘how’. It matters a lot.”

“Now he is gone… But he belongs to me like lost baggage.”

Today’s Lovely Darshan! 💚

2026-11-08T18:49:10.587+05:30

Thrilling Encounter in the Cauvery! 💚

2026-11-08T02:30:00.000+05:30

#intothewildwithrufus

Today’s Lovely Birding Adventures 💚

2026-11-08T01:00:00.000+05:30

#intothewildwithrufus

Today’s Lovely Birding Adventures In the Wild! 💚

2026-11-08T01:00:00.000+05:30

#intothewildwithrufus

When Rieux Met Nallasivam ❤️

2026-11-07T22:22:59.719+05:30

Meet the Cultural Mavericks – Camus and Kamal! 😊

#onhisbirthdaytoday

7th November

Well, first thing this morning, I rang up two people who mean the world to me – my Mom who is celebrating her birthday today, and my bosom buddy Santharaj, who is also celebrating his birthday today.

Amma has been a great inspiration on me! She calls me her ‘masterpiece’, and I call her a ‘maverick’!

Yes! She taught me how to look beyond the mundane and the ordinary! Amma always wanted me to take the untrodden paths! She wanted me to take to Music, do my college studies in Journalism and then join Discovery or National Geographic Channels! 😊Cos she is an ardent nature-lover! 😊

But then, Appa seasoned reason into it, and hey presto! I’m here blogging! 😊

So then… I’ve always had this curious question –

Is it a truth universally acknowledged, that all such cultural mavericks are born on 7th November? 😉

God knows! 😉

So now let’s look up two of such great cultural mavericks who were born on this lovely day – 7th November!

But before that, let’s define the term, ‘Cultural Maverick’.

A cultural maverick isn’t just someone who thinks differently; they are the bold independent artists, thinkers, and intellectuals who deliberately disrupt and defy the established norms and orthodoxies of their time. Instead of “meekly” and “cheekily” succumbing to dominant aesthetic or societal standards, they carve entirely new paths of their own, and lay the roads, for future society to happily walk on them!

Yes! Academia might guard the gates, but the maverick builds the roads, you see!

They are people who dare to disrupt the status quo! And because they do not seek permission or validation from traditional gatekeepers, they often speak directly to the public, democratising knowledge for the lay.

Today happens to be the birthday of two such cultural mavericks - Albert Camus and Kamal Haasan - legends who dared to defy the establishment and push the very boundaries of human expression!

Take Kamal Haasan, for instance. I admire him not only as a powerhouse-performer of sorts, but also as an avid reader and a relentless writer. Those close to him testify that he reads and writes almost daily, which explains how he has personally authored or co-authored the screenplays for approximately 40 of his 230-plus films.

Much akin to Kamal, Camus refused to be tied down to a single domain of activity. He wasn’t a desk-bound, arm-chair philosopher! Rather, he was a deeply committed theatre man who stepped actively into writing, directing, producing, and even acting on stage.

Just as Kamal adapted complex thrillers like Unnaipol Oruvan, Camus spent years adapting famed literary works like Dostoevsky’s The Possessed and Faulkner’s Requiem for a Nun for the theatre.

Both Camus and Kamal are known for taking massive creative risks, boldly introducing radical themes and technological innovations that were far ahead of their time.

Both are voracious readers and obsessive writers who have always championed societal issues through their art. Kamal pioneered method acting in Tamil cinema, pushing actors to psychologically and emotionally inhabit their characters to unearth raw truths.

Neither Kamal nor Camus has ever stayed in their comfort zones. Kamal has frequently risked his financial security by backing radical, taboo themes that carried no guarantee of commercial success, facing protests, bans, and political backlash across Tamil Nadu and beyond.

Quite interestingly, Camus made the exact same choice in the intellectual realm. By publishing The Rebel, he knowingly alienated the powerful Parisian intellectual elite and also damaged his long-time close friendship with Jean-Paul Sartre.

Both Camus and Kamal are trendsetters who firmly believed that –

To tell radically new truths, you have to invent radically new tools!

I would like to end this post with a comparative take on Kamal’s Anbe Sivam (for which he penned the story and screenplay) and Camus’s The Plague, simply for their stunning resemblances! 😊

In Camus’s masterpiece titled, The Plague, Dr. Bernard Rieux refuses to philosophise about the disease or look for divine meaning in the suffering. For him, fighting the plague is not about heroism; it is a necessity, an obligation and common decency.

Strikingly similar is the character of Nallasivam, who locates divinity entirely within the act of loving, helping and healing others - literally, Anbe Sivam (Love is God).

In The Plague, Dr. Rieux is an atheist who works tirelessly to heal the sick, driven not by the promise of heaven or the fear of hell, but by sheer human solidarity. Hence he refuses to philosophise about the disease or look for divine meaning in the suffering around him. For him, fighting the plague isn’t about heroism; it is a necessity, an obligation, and a matter of common decency.

In his most direct confrontation with Father Paneloux, after watching a young boy die in agony, Rieux rejects a universe that demands the suffering of innocents –

“No, Father. I’ve a very different idea of love. And until my dying day I shall refuse to love a scheme of things in which children are put to torture.”

He adds, “There’s no question of heroism in all this. It’s a matter of common decency... What interests me is being a man.”

In Anbe Sivam, during the harrowing train accident sequence, as people are bleeding and crying for help, the atheist Nallasivam delivers an epic line (that perfectly mirrors Dr. Rieux’s philosophy): “The one who sheds tears for another’s pain is God.”

Both Dr. Rieux and (Dr) Nallasivam are physically broken and exhausted by their journeys, yet they relentlessly strive to alleviate the pain of their fellow human beings simply because the person in front of them is suffering.

Wait! That’s not all.

Quite interestingly, the parallels extend brilliantly to their foil-characters as well!

Rambert in The Plague and Anbarasu in Anbe Sivam.

Both are self-centered, privileged men who are desperate to escape the collective suffering in order to pursue their personal happiness! Yet both are ultimately transformed by the grounded heroism of the protagonists.

Raymond Rambert, a journalist stuck in Oran, spends the first half of the novel trying to illegally escape quarantine to reach his lover in Paris. But after witnessing Rieux’s tireless work, he chooses to stay and fight, realising that “it may be shameful to be happy by oneself.”

Similarly, Anbarasu is an arrogant, capitalist ad-maker frantic to reach Chennai for his wedding, viewing the floods, strikes, and train accident as mere personal inconveniences. Yet, Nallasivam’s selfless actions systematically dismantle his ego. When Anbarasu witnesses Nallasivam donating his own blood - and finally recognises the profound sacrifices of Nallasivam’s past - he sheds his vanity and his inflated sense of individualism.

Both texts offer almost exactly the same conclusion, that – “grand narratival” rhetoric alone cannot heal a bleeding child. When systems fail, the ultimate antidote is radical, interpersonal compassion and empathy!

Through their protagonists Dr. Rieux and (Dr.) Nallasivam - both texts argue that true grace is found not in the unseen heavens up there, but in the exhausting and tireless work of lifting another human being up!

So, even as we celebrate Camus and Kamal on their birthdays today, let’s not forget the main takeaways –

To disrupt is to push the boundaries of human expression.

And… true revolution lies in choosing radical empathy over the “grand narratives” that dictate our lives for us.

As eminent critic Scupin Richards rightly points out –

Human empathy is the highest form of humanism... and the ultimate form of divinity!

How true!

Birding Delights for Today

2026-11-07T20:26:00.000+05:30

#intothewildwithrufus

Today’s Lovely Birding Delights! 💚

2026-11-07T18:01:56.508+05:30

#intothewildwithrufus

The Grizzled Giant Squirrel is a near-threatened squirrel species.

They are unique to the Cauvery wildlife basin.

The Indian Robin – Male

Tickell’s Blue Flycatcher

Red-vented Bulbul - with a winged termite in its beak

White-bellied Drongo on the left and the Red-vented Bulbul on the right, holding its insect catch.

White-throated Kingfisher against the canopy cover

Carpenter Bee

Pied Bush Chat - Male

Rose-ringed Parakeet - Male

Rose-ringed Parakeet - Male and Female

Avian Wonders for Today 💚

2026-11-07T05:30:00.000+05:30

#intothewildwithrufus #birding

The People’s Intellectuals | Four Writers Who Rewrote the Rules ❤️

2026-11-05T23:00:00.000+05:30

The Mavericks of 5th November! ❤️

#onhisbirthdaytoday #onherbirthdaytoday

05 November

I’ve always loved the words, ‘maverick’ and ‘iconoclast’. Don’t know why! So don’t ask me why! 😊

What if I tell you that, 5th November saw the birth of four great mavericks in all of literature!

Yes! Although several notable authors and literary figures were born on the 5th of November - around fifteen in total, this post intends to focus on just four of them - Will Durant, Sam Shepard, John Berger, and Ella Wheeler Wilcox - and for a very specific reason!

They are what academia would call, ‘mavericks’ or ‘iconoclasts’ or ‘public intellectuals’ or ‘organic intellectuals’ or ‘moral intellectuals’.

In our literature classes, we professors often emphasise on the importance of writing.

As they say, writing is discovery, and writers are indeed revolutionaries!

Personally, I believe that literature students who do not write daily are missing out on the core obligation demanded of the discipline!

They are something akin to cartographers who memorise maps of towns, cities, and forests, but have never actually walked those lovely, beautiful terrain by themselves.

The four writers mentioned above embody exactly that revolutionary spirit. We can call them public intellectuals, organic intellectuals, or moral intellectuals, but definitely not academic intellectuals. 😊

An academic intellectual primarily operates within a university’s rigid institutional structure, producing highly specialised, “peer-reviewed” knowledge for a closed, elite community of scholars.

These four writers, on the other hand, abandoned or bypassed the academy early on. They were mavericks by all means - and in the cases of Berger and Shepard, they were true iconoclasts!

Let’s take up each of these mavericks one by one –

Firstly, let’s discuss Will Durant: The Public Intellectual!

Well, a public intellectual is someone who boldly steps outside their specialised field of study to engage with the broader public in literary, societal and cultural discourse.

In that sense, Will Durant could be called the the ideal public intellectual In fact, his entire career was an exercise in taking the heavy, “gated” knowledge of academia and repackaging it for the layperson.

In our literature classes, we always recommend his 1926 classic, The Story of Philosophy, as we consider philosophy as the “twin sister of literature”. 😊

Interestingly, the book didn’t originate in a university press; it evolved from his writing for “Little Blue Books” - affordable, pocket-sized pamphlets designed to bring high culture to the American working class. Durant deliberately stripped away all the high academic jargon so that he could be easily understood by all and sundry!

Remember Will Durant’s famous quote? –

Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance!

Awesome, ain’t it? 😊

Secondly, let’s take up John Berger! In Antonio Gramsci’s Marxist framework, an “organic intellectual” does not drop knowledge down from above. Instead, they emerge from a specific social or working class to articulate its experiences and challenge the cultural hegemony of the ruling class. In this regard, Berger perfectly fits this description to a tee!

In fact, he actively rebelled against the elite, bourgeois university art historians, and relocated to a rural French farming village to write the Into Their Labours trilogy. In doing so, he became the organic intellectual of the European peasant, articulating their disappearing way of life against the forces of modern capitalism.

Thirdly, let’s look up Sam Shepard, yet another organic intellectual of sorts! He was famously called the “Voice of the American West” - an organic intellectual, for the rural, disenfranchised American West. He boldly articulated the violence and economic disillusionment of the American working class, creating a sharp contrast to the refined, elegant bourgeois theatre of his time, thereby bypassing formal theatrical institutions of his time!

Finally, let’s take up Ella Wheeler Wilcox, the Moral Intellectual!

In fact, Wilcox could be called a true maverick. She was openly mocked by the academic literary establishment for her lack of “good taste!” However, she completely ignored their dictates and built a massive audience for herself, bypassing traditional institutions to counsel the public directly on marriage, temperance, compassion, and personal responsibility.

She also popularised the “New Thought” movement - a forerunner to modern positive psychology which argued that mental states shape physical reality! She wanted to uphold traditional morality while connecting directly with the masses!

Sample the following immortal lines from her poem Solitude -

Laugh, and the world laughs with you; Weep, and you weep alone.

You might want to enjoy reading more of her power-quotes –

On absolute determination (from Will):

There is no chance, no destiny, no fate,

Can circumvent or hinder or control

The firm resolve of a determined soul.

On shifting our perspective (from The Weed):

A weed is but an unloved flower.

On the ultimate arc of justice (from Settle the Question Right):

No question is ever settled

Until it is settled right.

On speaking up against injustice (from Protest):

To sin by silence, when we should protest,

Makes cowards out of men.

These lines perfectly capture why the academic establishment might have found her too simplistic for academia! And that’s exactly the reason why the public absolutely loved her. She had the courage to boldly bypass the intellectual gatekeepers to give practical, moral anchors to her people, so that they could actually use them in their daily lives.

From the above four writers and their maverick lines oops lives, we find that, they continue to have the greatest impact on our societies – because they had the guts to write their hearts out - bypassing academic or cultural gatekeepers in the process!

And so… don’t just memorise the map. Step out of the academy, walk the terrain all by yourself, and write your own “revolution”. 😊

As eminent critic Scupin Richards rightly points out,

“Academia might guard the gates, but it’s always the mavericks who build the roads. So keep building… oops… writing!”

Maverically yours… 😉

Dr. Rufus

Myself Only Writing This… 😉

2026-11-03T23:30:00.000+05:30

Is it ok to say “My Mrs.”? (Vasu, Kakinada)

#newspaperinlearning

From the Know Your English Column, The Hindu, dt 3rd Nov 2026

Is it ok to say “My Mrs.”? (Vasu, Kakinada)

And Prof. Upendran’s lovely reply –

In India it is fairly common for a man to refer to his wife as his “Mrs.”

“My Mrs. is not feeling well,” is a sentence that one hears very often.

Friends often ask, “How is your Mrs.?” or “How is your family?”.

The word “family” is often used to refer to the wife as well. Indians use these expressions in both formal and informal contexts.

A native speaker of English does use the word “Mrs.” to refer to his wife, but he does so usually in informal contexts. He uses the word jocularly; and never in formal contexts. When talking about his wife, a native speaker refers to her as “my wife” or calls her by her name,

he observes.

Well, this rings a bell, especially in the context of a famous poem that we were discussing in our II MA English Class last month. It’s by Nissim Ezekiel and it’s titled, ‘Goodbye Party for Miss. T. S. Pushpa’.

We had a discussion on the topic of linguistic subversion, and the legitimisation of Indian English. (Because up until then, Indian English poetry very often relied on British mimicry).

In fact, Ezekiel’s poem was in a way a validation of the everyday raw realities of office life – or rather a vindication of the rights of Indian English! 😊

On an aside, to be honest, the grammatical subversions in the poem made us have a hearty laugh, but at the same time it also made us ruminate on the importance of grammatical subversions, and celebrate the quirks of native Indian tongues!

For example, the overuse of the present continuous tense in the poem –

“Miss Pushpa is coming,” “She is smiling and smiling”. “Why world is fighting, fighting”, or Literal translations like, “Two three days,” “Just now only,” which could be called examples of structural nativisation or L1-Interference.

Now coming to the main point -

This reminds me of yet another humorous book that was published almost two decades ago, on the subject of Indian English.

It’s titled, Entry from Backside Only, by Binoo K John, and it has all the essentials and the ingredients to make us have a hearty laugh, and to make us think as well!

In fact, the book looks at Indian-English not as a set of mistakes, but as a practical language cooked up by everyday users like roadside astrologers, babus, and quacks. It shows how we took the Queen’s English and fully localised it to suit our own daily logic and regional translations.

Sample a few of these lovely expressions from the book –

Carry out your own bag, put up at a Mother Dairy booth so customers remember to bring their own bags.

Home Late, a tea-stall owner’s completely logical spelling for an omelette.

One minute relax, one-day happy, painted outside a Cuddalore tea shop.

Under standing people will suffer, shouted by a professor at students making a ruckus.

Entry from backside only, a standard Indian sign board that completely misses the joke.

Myself in-charge here, the universal Indian way to introduce oneself.

Hopes Revives, Life Comes Again, printed in a 1921 advertisement for Amritdhara tonic.

Expose all my shocking to man and female women, from Okhil Chandra Sen’s 1909 railway complaint.

My belly is too much swelling with jackfruit, also from Okhilbabu’s legendary letter.

Avoid to use polythene bag - A stern, grammatically twisted warning pasted below a computer print-out at a Mother Dairy vegetable outlet in Delhi.

Meter jump to be paid by the customer - A creative disclaimer by a Srinagar telephone booth operator to cover business risks from his unpredictable digital meter.

Intensified pleasings to partner and happiness in marriage - The bold promise made by street-side sexologists selling ayurvedic tablets for “secret diseases”.

The cipher is set as ‘000’ in the factory and you can remain it: The baffling opening instruction on a tiny pamphlet explaining how to use a number lock.

I wand working women in any privte or govt, but mostly like beauty and honesty natures - An advocate and “businessman of granite” outlining his matrimonial demands.

Steam action will be taken against such driver - An Uttaranchal transport department advisory warning drivers against consuming “any intoxication like alcohol etc” on hill roads.

If escalators are closed or luggage has fallen don get panicky - A helpful railway instruction painted near the New Delhi station escalators.

We will continue to sapply profit to darling customers... and the vendor type people - A spoof in-house ad run by the Economic Times.

Could you please mind me and mend the torn hope? - A desperate plea from a reader who was on a “wild goose-chase” looking for a specific book.

My head is eating circles and circles over all this golmal - A literal translation of a Hindi idiom used by Jug Suraiya in a satirical letter about the Oxford dictionary adding Indian slang.

So… yup!

Next time someone asks you to “please do the needful”, don’t please give them a mouthful, but rather be mindful to appreciate the sheer genius of the way in which they have lifted the ‘Queen’s language, added their own native flavours and spices, and served it to you in such a way that is so perfectly localised to suit our our everyday lived realities.

As Chinua Achebe says –

Let no one be fooled by the fact that we may write in English, for we intend to do unheard of things with it! 🥳

“Unheard of things,” you see! 🥳😎

And yes, myself only writing this… 😉

Did You Know a “Companion” is Just a Bread-Sharer? ❤️

2026-11-03T22:12:38.612+05:30

The Changing Lives of Words | Reflections

Gleaned from today’s Know Your English Column in The Hindu

3 November 2026 #newspaperinlearning

The “Know Your English” column is a popular weekly column in the pages of The Hindu that ardent and devoted readers of the newspaper would never fail to look out for!

The column, compiled by Prof. S. Upendran, a professor (now retired) at the English and Foreign Languages University (EFLU) in Hyderabad, answers readers’ genuine queries about word meanings, pronunciation, common idioms, phrasal verbs, and frequently confused expressions.

In today’s The Hindu, there were some of these gleanings from the archives.

A well-meaning reader had asked this question –

What is the difference between “friend” and “companion”? (S. Sateesh, Bangalore)

To which Prof. Upendran so aptly replies -

The meaning of the word “friend” has undergone several changes. I understand that during Shakespeare’s time the word was used to refer to one’s mistress! Nowadays, of course, the word “friend” is used to refer to someone whom you have known for some time and with whom you have a reasonably good relationship. The individual could be someone in whom you confide; a person to whom you tell your problems. In the case of a friend there is an emotional bonding, but there does not have to be physical proximity. You and your friend need not be together all the time.

A “companion”, on the other hand, is an ambiguous term. This individual could be like a friend in that he/she may be very close to you. For example, Dr. Watson was Holmes’ constant companion; he went wherever the great detective went.

They got along famously and they were good friends. The word “companion” can also be used to refer to someone who accompanies you on a journey. You may talk to him, share food with him, but once you get off the train/bus, you may never see him again.

While the word “friend” stresses the emotional bonding between individuals, “companion” stresses the physical presence of the individual being referred to,

says Prof. Upendran!

Well, this blogger would like to just add to the lovely reply provided by Prof. Upendran.

It’s from the book titled, An Outline History of the English Language by F. T. Wood.

On an aside, one thing that I so like about this book is that, it’s jargon-free, and hence makes a highly engaging read for all and sundry. Particular mention should be made about the fact that, Wood treats linguistic changes that impact the meaning of a particular word, as direct consequences of historical events (e.g., Norman Conquest or Renaissance humanism or Scandinavian settlements or imperial expansion).

In Chapter VII of the book titled, ‘Change of Meaning’, he explains the reasons how and why words undergo a change of meaning over time. (Now you know why Saussure prefers a synchronic over a diachronic study of language – wherein he sees language as a complete, self-contained system of interrelated signs at a specific point in time (ignoring historical changes) 😊

Says Wood –

One of the first things that the student of literature comes to realise, perhaps at first with a little surprise, is that many words have not always had the same meaning that they bear today.

He may, for instance, set himself to study a few plays of Shakespeare, and soon he learns that a fool, to Shakespeare, meant something different from what it means to us, that a battle could be used to signify not only a fight but also a company of soldiers (equivalent to our modern word battalion), that fond implied ‘foolish’ more often than ‘loving’, and that when a character says’ I’ll be with you presently ‘he does not mean soon, or later on, but immediately.

Countless words in the English language have changed or modified their meaning in this way; and it is quite natural that they should have done.

For words are not static, despite a very widespread belief to the contrary even amongst intelligent and educated people. No less a person than Dr. Johnson, when he first began to collect the material for his dictionary, supposed that they were and that he could fix them for all time; but before he had completed his task he had altered his mind.

Actually, of course, words have no independent and intrinsic meaning; they have, in fact, no meaning at all apart from that given them by the human mind and by their context; for they are essentially vehicles for the expression of thoughts and ideas on the one hand and for their evocation on the other.

That is why it is a fallacy, to which the academic mentality too often falls a victim, to suppose that a word can properly be used only in its ‘root’ or etymological sense.

Quite clearly, a particular word may evoke different ideas, or have different associations, for different persons or different ages.

Thus the word pipe means one thing to the smoker, another to the plumber and something else to the organ-builder, while the mention of the word plane will call up three distinct and widely divergent ideas in the minds of the geometrician, the carpenter and the aeronaut respectively.

In the same way when an Englishman in the early days of the manorial system heard the word villein he merely thought of a very lowly labourer; but two hundred years later it brought to mind primarily not the social position or the occupation of such a person but his uncouth manners and behaviour, and later still it suggested an evil-doer, possibly because of a curious human tendency to identify social respectability and ‘gentlemanly’ behaviour with moral integrity, and to look upon their opposites with suspicion.

1. Generalisation. A very frequent means by which a change of meaning occurs in a word is by the process which we may call generalisation; that is to say, a term which at one time had a specialised and restricted meaning comes, in course of time, to have a wider application.

A typical example here is the word box, today one of the commonest and most generalised of nouns in the English language.

Originally, however, it was the name of a tree and the wood from it. In Twelfth Night, it will be recalled, Sir Toby Belch and his cronies hide behind a box tree when they lie in wait to enjoy Malvolio’s discovery of the forged letter. Being rare and expensive, box wood was used almost exclusively for making small caskets for the reception of jewellery, which receptacle, became known, in its turn, as a box.

For many years, then, a box was always made of a particular kind of wood, after which it was named, and was of quite small dimensions.

Gradually, however, less insistence was laid on the material and more on the object, so that one could speak of a box of cedar wood, of oak or of walnut; but right up to the year 1700 or thereabouts the idea of smallness still attached to it. A bigger kind of receptacle was called a chest.

So already the process of generalisation had started. But since the eighteenth century it has gone much farther, with the result that today a box may be of any material (not only wood) and of any size. And we can even speak of a horse-box on the railway or a box at the theatre, while a verb to box (to put or to pack into boxes) has been coined.

Similarly with the words journey and journal. Both are derived from the French noun jour (day). The root meaning of journey is a day’s walk or ride, and of journal a daily record of events, and in the case of this latter the literal sense is still retained in the specialised use to denote (a) a diary, and (b) a book in which a business firm records its daily transactions. But for long now, in their more ordinary acceptation, both have lost this restricted meaning, so that we may speak, without any seeming incongruity, of ‘a journey of several weeks’ or of ‘a monthly journal’.

A similar extension or generalisation is to be seen in the two words companion and comrade. Literally the former means ‘one who eats bread with another person’ (Lat. con=with, panis=bread; cf. Fr. pain); just as the latter means ‘one who shares a room’ (It. camera=a room); but since those with whom we eat bread or share a room are likely to become our close friends for the time being, the inevitable shifting of emphasis took place and the modern signification of these words was evolved. In both cases, of course, the root meaning has been entirely lost and it will probably come as a revelation to most people to learn of it,

says Wood.

To conclude then, in the words of the ‘Great Dissenter’ Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr –

A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged; it is the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in colour and content according to the circumstances and the time in which it is used.

So yes! the next time you introduce someone as a companion, remember that, diachronically speaking, 😉 you are indeed continuing a centuries-old tradition of simply sharing your bread with them!

What is the True Call of an Academic? ❤️

2026-11-02T21:43:08.077+05:30

Teaching or Research?

Awakening Human Consciousness in Higher Education

#newspaperinlearning

I was so happy to read two insightful articles by two passionate literarians, in today’s The Hindu, Chennai Edition.

And that’s where The Hindu stands tall, I guess – wherein legendary academics of great repute find a space to air their thoughts and ideas in featured OpEd/Opinion Columns.

Now let’s go to the first article from The Opinion Page of The Hindu by Ms. Mini Krishnan.

Ms. Mini opines that, literature education is essential for building empathy and bridging deep societal divides across caste, class and gender.

Rather than simply lamenting the decline of the humanities, Mini argues that ignoring literature results in systemic inequality by shielding students from the lived realities of people! She also gives out a shocking statement that, educational institutions often sanitise their curriculums just to avoid local discomfort!

As a solution she suggests that, integrating translated regional works and culture studies into curriculums exposes students to uncomfortable local realities, such as gender oppression and caste-based slavery.

Studying such diverse literature and translations can help in building the invisible bridges necessary for future generations to break all kinds of social barriers.

In this regard, she highlights on the importance of writers and translators who act as crucial bridge-builders, helping students connect across linguistic barriers to challenge ingrained prejudices that are still practised across generations.

The second article is by my very good friend Dr. Joseph Dorairaj, Professor Emeritus, Gandhigram University.

This article examines the long-standing conflict in higher education between classroom teaching and academic research, analysing how global rankings, career incentives, and institutional frameworks have always favoured research over teaching.

Dr. Joe questions whether higher education institutions (HEIs) can realistically balance both teaching and research mandates and elaborates on the reasons why research commands greater prestige than classroom teaching!

Tracing the modern research university back to Wilhelm von Humboldt, Dr. Joe observes that, senior professors in both Western and Indian universities frequently delegate undergraduate teaching to teaching assistants and junior faculty, thereby missing out on precious opportunities to mentor younger students.

Added, even institutional evaluation metrics - such as NAAC and NIRF in India, alongside global QS and THE rankings - heavily favour research output, publications, and citations over pedagogical quality, driving the academic trade-off firmly toward research.

And Dr. Joe concludes this article by stating that, while the tension between teaching and research will permanently persist, the institutional and global stakes now definitively favour research.

And that’s mainly because of the urgency in the field of innovation!

The urgency in academia is that, we need quality academic work that can push the frontiers of knowledge by generating new insights and theories. Furthermore, valuable research should constantly redefine our understanding of the world by developing and disseminating new concepts and paradigms to address unprecedented global challenges, he signs off.

On an aside, I wish to add that, for more than three decades now, Dr. Joseph Dorairaj has been writing consistently in journals and newspapers alike on the need and the importance of enhancing the standard and quality of research. You may want to read one such past article by Dr. Joe on our past blogpost from 13 years ago, HERE on our blog, when we had invited him to MCC to talk about Research in Higher Education.

So what then is the true call of the academic today?

To Dr. Joe, the true call of an academic is not just to merely transfer knowledge, but to awaken human consciousness!

I’m quite reminded of one of my most favourite lines from all of literature –

From Ulysses by Alfred Lord Tennyson –

To follow knowledge like a sinking star,

Beyond the utmost bound of human thought…

So beautifully penned, ain’t it? 😊

And therein lies the importance of these two articles from today’s The Hindu for academia!

PS: I would like to take a minute to acknowledge and to appreciate Prof. Sundhar from Theni Kammavar Sangam College of Arts and Science, for so consistently sharing from the Educational Supplement in the pages of The Hindu, for more than 80 days now. Today is the 88th sharing! By sharing what we read, we are growing indeed! And that is the noble call of an academic. Hats off to you Prof. Sundhar. We academics are so proud of you. Keep shining. Stop not!

And even as I am writing this post, I receive the happiest news that our illustrious alumnus Mr. Hudson's research article on Blue Humanities has been published in the International Journal of Maritime History, a Q2 journal, indexed in Scopus and published by SAGE. We are so proud of you dear Mathew Hudson. Keep shining. Stop not!

Eco-Fencing the Wild | MCC’s Massive Deer Restoration Project 💚

2026-11-02T07:44:00.000+05:30

MCC plans to restore wildlife corridors to protect spotted deer

Today’s The Times of India, Chennai Edition

2nd November 2026

Madras Christian College is taking efforts to restore wildlife corridors on its 320-acre campus to prevent spotted deer from venturing into academic areas, including canteens, in search of food. The pilot project will use geoinformatics, native plants and plant-based biofencing. Plants such as fimbristylis, Asian bushbeech, prostrate justicia and Chinese violet will be grown in the core scrub area to provide forage for the deer.

The campus, which has one of the largest scrub-jungle patches in the country, is home to more than 100 spotted deer, as well as several other species, including snakes, birds, porcupines, civets and bats. Professors said students often feed the deer, which could affect their health.

“Restoring these corridors is aimed at reducing the deer’s dependence on food provided by humans and its encounters with people,” said Paul Wilson, principal of the college and also the president of the Wildlife Conservation Club.

As part of the Wildlife Conservation Club’s initiative, the study will use Geographic Information Systems (GIS), including GPS field surveys, satellite imagery and camera traps, to map vegetation patches, identify gaps in the habitat and trace the deer’s movement paths. Spatial analysis will then be used to identify the safest routes linking habitat patches.

“Based on these maps, native plants will be planted as a ‘living fence’, or biofence,” said S Saranya, vice-president of the Wildlife Conservation Club.

“We have identified 17 plant species preferred by deer inside the campus. The plantation will reconnect fragmented habitat and provide forage, giving the deer food in natural zones,” said M Kumar, a faculty member in the botany department. Following the pilot study, the college is likely to approach its alumni and companies for funds to restore the wildlife corridors.

Arise, Awake, and Ask Why: Cultivating the Spirit of Inquiry ❤️

2026-11-01T21:44:52.611+05:30

Scientific Temper or Sleepwalker? The Choice is…

#newspaperinlearning

This morning, while reading through the day’s newspapers, over my double-strong espresso, 😊I came across a highly insightful news report in The Hindu and The Times of India on the recent Convocation Address at the University of Science and Technology Meghalaya, delivered by Justice Ujjal Bhuyan.

His convocation address intrigued me for two key reasons.

Firstly, his exhortation to society to face questions rather than fear them. As he rightly noted,

“A society that fears questions becomes vulnerable to authoritarianism. A society that treats tradition as beyond scrutiny may fail to reform unjust practices.”

Secondly, his strong advocacy for a ‘scientific temper’. Highlighting Article 51A of the Constitution, which casts a duty on every citizen to develop a scientific temperament, Justice Bhuyan says –

I believe scientific temperament lays the foundation for the rule of law. This has to take place in the University. This is because arbitrary power thrives on ignorance, fear, and unexamined belief. A society that accepts claims without evidence is susceptible to superstitious beliefs and becomes vulnerable to misinformation.

In fact, these observations by Justice Bhuya beautifully echo the aspirations of millions of teachers and parents.

So what exactly is a scientific temper and spirit of inquiry in everyday life?

Simple! It is the habit of asking “why?” and demanding proof before accepting a claim. When we continuously train our minds to look for evidence, we are applying the principles of this scientific temper.

I see this regularly while evaluating my students’ answer sheets. Recently, I noticed a few students giving vague generalisations as answers, without offering any textual evidence to back their claims. I had to leave a remark –

Vague generalisations do not merit the academic spirit or the spirit of intellectual inquiry! Where is the evidence for your claims and statements?

In fact, the academic spirit is simply a branch office of the scientific spirit - it demands evidence for all your claims within a logical, coherent structure.

For example, a student of mine had written, “John Donne is known for his metaphysical conceits. He was also known for his abrupt opening lines, and his wit…”.

Without examples (evidence supporting the claim) from Donne’s poems, these are just sweeping statements and vague generalisations.

“The proof of the pudding is in the eating”, and similarly, the proof of reading a text shows in how you use evidence to back your claims.

The academic spirit, much akin to the scientific one, simply does not trust unverified assumptions.

Coming back to Justice Bhuyan’s address, we can see why this mindset is very much the need of the hour today.

Imagine receiving a classic “WhatsApp University” forward claiming, ‘Tomorrow is a holiday for schools and colleges.’

Well, without a scientific mindset, you might react purely out of emotion or blind belief. A society with a scientific temper, however, pauses to ask for evidence and verify the source.

And that exactly is the scientific temper at work!

This is exactly what the great Socrates advocated almost 24 centuries ago. He compares himself to a gadfly stinging a sluggish horse, because he believed it was his civic duty to disturb the complacent citizens of Athens, waking them from their slumber of ignorance and urging them to cultivate a questioning mind.

He once famously remarked that a human life without the scientific temper (rational enquiry) is reduced to the level of a sleepwalker.

This philosophy aligns perfectly with Swami Vivekananda’s famous exhortation –

“Arise, awake, and stop not till the goal is reached.”

To arise then, is to shake off our lethargy;

To awake is to break free from the slumber of ignorance and limiting beliefs!

And to stop not is a call for commitment, resisting the pull of smaller desires and distractions along the way!

Scientific temper or sleepwalker? The difference is like chalk and cheese.

I’m sure that this spirit of inquiry is the greatest takeaway that Justice Bhuyan has passed on to the graduating students.

You can watch the full Convocation Address by Justic Bhuyan [HERE].

PS: You may also want to read our past blog post on ‘The Unexamined Life’ from seven years ago, [HERE] on our blog.

The Power of TEA in Action ❤️

2026-10-31T22:43:24.409+05:30

Some Strong TEA for Academics! 😊

Celebrating the Disciplined Prose Style of a 92-Year-Old MCC Legend

#newspaperinlearning

Today’s The Hindu Editorial Article

It’s indeed quite rare today to find writers of Shri M. K. Narayanan’s acumen and calibre. He’s been such a consistent and dedicated writer, wielding the pen for more then seven decades now.

I should confess that, I’ve been an ardent fan of Mr. Narayanan’s articles in the columns of The Hindu for more than three decades now. 😊 He regularly writes for some of the prominent Indian newspapers including The Hindu, and his articles usually focus on foreign policy, regional security, strategic affairs, and cross-border dialogues.

Well, this illustrious alumnus of MCC and MCC School (my alma mater) 😊 – Shri M. K. Narayanan IPS, is now 92 years old! He joined the IPS in 1955, and went on to serve as Director of the Intelligence Bureau (IB), National Security Advisor (NSA), and then as Governor of West Bengal.

This post is not only meant to shower encomiums on the legendary writer, but also to appreciate this article that he’s written in today’s The Hindu, for its highly structured argument and the nuanced way in which he puts forth his 11 core ideas systematically, in 11 distinct paragraphs.

Well, before we go ahead, let me reiterate the fact that, an editorial article is much akin to an academic article. Authors usually do not use the first person while writing such essays. Moreover, both articles have an introduction, a clear thesis statement, body paragraphs with factual support, the acknowledgment of counterarguments, and a conclusion. However, editorial articles are short and punchy whereas academic essays discuss ideas in a more graded and elaborate manner.

And as we academics are fully aware, every paragraph in an academic essay should contain ONE IDEA!

So the structure of a paragraph should be based on the TEA rubric for academics!

Topic Sentence

Evidence to support the Topic Sentence

Analysis based on the ideas presented in the topic sentence and evidence.

And this is exactly the structure of this beautiful editorial article by our illustrious MCC alumnus – the legendary 92-year old Shri M. K. Narayanan, IPS, in The Hindu newspaper today.

The first paragraph is based on the idea of “Managed Coexistence”. The current state of Sino-Indian relations is defined by frequent border face-offs, raising questions about the viability of long-term peace.

The second paragraph is based on the idea of “The 1962 Legacy” - the historical 1962 conflict and the loss of territory in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh which remain a permanent sore!

The third paragraph discusses the idea of highlighting the need to demystify underlying tensions.

The fourth paragraph is based on the idea of “Improper Border Demarcation”. He states that, improperly delineated terrain in Ladakh and the McMahon Line in Arunachal Pradesh are frequently cited by experts as the primary roadblocks to a bilateral solution.

The fifth paragraph is based on the idea of “Diplomatic Thaws”, giving historical evidence from the past. Past initiatives, notably Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi’s 1988 visit, successfully separated the border dispute to allow for military confidence-building measures.

The sixth paragraph is built on the idea of “Zero-Sum Game” where he states that, recent bilateral initiatives feel like a zero-sum game, worsened by Chinese strategists misinterpreting India’s involvement in the US-sponsored QUAD.

The seventh paragraph focusses on the idea of “rejecting China as an existential threat for India”. Both nations should instead pursue a constructive relationship of strategic stability, he says.

The eighth paragraph is built on the idea of “Mutual Deterrence”. Direct conflict would derail China’s 2049 global leadership targets and India has no inclination for war, making avoidance of inadvertent action essential, he observes.

The ninth paragraph is based on the idea of “The Military Myth of China”. Narayanan observes that the narrative of an overwhelming Chinese military edge is a myth, as India remains a formidable match in the high Himalayas.

The tenth paragraph reflects on the idea that, “India must accurately interpret China’s intentions” and adhere to frameworks like the 2005 Agreement, which prohibits the use of force.

The final paragraph focusses on the idea of “Historical Vulnerabilities”. China's national identity has historical frailties, and misreading its elastic boundaries would be costly, but the two nations are not destined for permanent war, he signs off.

Shri M. K. Narayanan’s editorial indeed serves as a powerful inspiration for all of us aspiring writers. In addition, it also helps us understand the intricate mechanics of formal writing.

Especially for students and research scholars striving to perfect the TEA rubric, this piece I am sure would be a guiding light for y’all. The discipline in his prose style is awe-inspiring!

Witnessing such an illustrious alumnus of our very own Madras Christian College who still continues to shape national discourse with such intellectual vitality at 92 years, is both humbling and profoundly inspiring for all of us.

Viva la MCC!

PS: You may want to read this blogger’s analysis of yet another editorial by Shri M. K. Narayanan, HERE on our blog, from exactly three years ago, 11 October 2023.

Beyond the Roll Call | The Real Joys of Learning❤️

2026-10-29T20:26:36.448+05:30

Celebrating the Details

Today | II MA English

Dear Students of the II MA English class,

Even as the Odd Semester downs the shutters on yet another eventful and rewarding term, I wish to take a minute out and appreciate those of you who were present in class today from 8:30 am to 9:30 am for my last class of this semester with you.

BENITTA J

DAPHNIE IDA D

IRENE THOMSON

JOTHIKA R

MEENATCHI P

NIHITA CHINNU SIBU

RAKSHAYA G

SARA SAJU OOMMEN

SWARNA REKHA S

VENKATA VISHNUPRIYA D

EBENEZAR DHANARAJ D

R MARVEL GIFTSON

As your Professor, I am so happy to witness your commitment, your dedication and your resolve to show up in class today, in spite of the fact that the official attendance was closed a while ago.

At a time when academic participation is so often driven solely based on marks and roll calls, your presence today in class speaks volumes to the genuine joy of learning!

You came not because you had to, but because you wanted to, and that means the world to me as a teacher.

Thank you for your commitment and your sincere dedication. You have made this semester incredibly special for me!

And yes! Make the most of the study hols, in the brief stint of semester holidays that follow from tomorrow on, during which time, as you all are aware, your professors would be quite busy 24x7 poring over all your answer sheets and busy giving you your marks, after which time you’d be gearing up to face head on - your final frontier to be conquered for this Semester 😊 - your End of Semester Examinations, that start from Wednesday, 4th November 2026.

I also wish to appreciate and highly commend the following students who wrote exceptionally clear, and crisp writing that had no overwriting, smudges or corrections anywhere in their answer sheets.

IRENE THOMSON

NIHITA CHINNU SIBU

RAKSHAYA G

SARAH SAJU OOMMEN

R. MARVEL GIFTSON

Three cheers to you for having taken the time to celebrating excellence in every detail. Keep it up!

We your professors are so proud of you.

Best wishes,

Dr. Rufus

Course Teacher

Paradise Lost and Dedication Found! ❤️😊

2026-10-28T23:40:41.070+05:30

Beyond the Attendance Register | A Note of Appreciation

28th October 2026

Dear I MA English Students,

I wish to express my sincere appreciation to you, for your presence in class today.

At the fag end of this semester, especially when the “pressure of attendance” is no longer hanging like the proverbial sword of Damocles, 😊 your decision to show up in class today, your last teaching day with me for this semester, speaks volumes about your genuine commitment to your academic journey.

BHAVATHARNE M

ANUGRAHAN SUDHAKAR

JOAN STEFFI

KAVIN NALLARASU I

FEBA EVANGELIN LESLY

VEENA J

ASHNA ELIZABETH KURIAN

VIVEKANANDHI R

I am so overjoyed to see my dear students engage with the subject purely for the joy of learning rather than merely for that entry on the attendance register.

Your enthusiasm brings immense value to the class and makes our teaching experience deeply rewarding.

And yes! today we completed Paradise Lost Book IX on a very rewarding note!

We your professors are so proud of you.

Keep shining.

Arise, awake and stop not, till the goal is reached!

Best wishes.

Dr. Rufus

Course Teacher

Clear Medium, Clear Message! ❤️✍️

2026-10-27T20:32:47.057+05:30

The Power of Real Penmanship!

I MA English Class

#neatness #neatwriting

Neat handwriting free of smudging and overwriting is fundamentally about respecting the reader’s time and ensuring that message is understood exactly as you had intended.

On that note, special congratulations to the fabulous four from the I MA English class, for neat presentation in their answer sheets, thereby bagging the extra bonus marks for neatness. They get 28/30 marks each.

Alena Sara Thomas

Veena J

Feba Evangelin Lesly

Ashna Elizabeth Kurian

Interestingly, Ms. Alena and Ms. Veena have authored two books each, thus far.

Keep it up our dear students.

As eminent critic Scupin Richard rightly points out,

Writing is a tool for communication. If the medium is messy, the message becomes a mess!

PS: Veena is bagging the bonus marks for neat writing for the third time in a row! Earlier she had won her professor’s appreciation and bonus marks for neat handwriting, when she was in her UG Final year in MCC. You may want to look up that post HERE on our blog.

You make our hearts happy, our days complete and our teaching purposeful! ❤️

2026-10-26T07:38:00.000+05:30

26th October 26

The Vibrant II MA English Class

I want to extend a special word of appreciation to each of you who turned up in class for the past two days.

Being the last week of the Odd Semester, with just a couple of days to go for your Study Holidays, you had the option to be elsewhere, yet you chose to be present.

Your attendance in class speaks volumes about your genuine commitment to your studies.

In fact, it is this voluntary dedication that we admire a lot in our students.

It is indeed deeply encouraging and it also feels an absolute joy to engage with you.

Congratulations to you on investing in your education with such genuine commitment and dedication.

As your Professor, I am sooo proud of you.

24th October 2026

1. ANITHA S

2. BENITTA J

3. JOTHIKA R

4. KPB AARTHI

5. KEERTHI V

6. NAVEENA DEBORAH D

7. RAKSHAYA G

8. RANGINEETHA RAMALINGAM

9. SAMITHA S

10. SWARNA REKHA S

11. VENKATA VISHNUPRIYA D

12. EBENEZAR DHANARAJ D

13. JOSHUA JOSEPH

14. R MARVEL GIFTSON

26th October 2026

1. BENITTA J

2. DAPHNIE IDA D

3. DIVYASHREE

4. JOTHIKA R

5. KPB AARTHI

6. MEENATCHI P

7. SAMITHA S

8. SWARNA REKHA S

9. VENKATA VISHNUPRIYA D

10. EBENEZAR DHANARAJ D

Interestingly, these students form part of the select few who always make it a point to inform their teacher courteously and promptly whenever they are not able to make it to their classes.

Here’s wishing you the best in all your academic endeavours.

You make our hearts happy, our days complete and our teaching purposeful! 😊

Best regards,

Dr. Rufus

Course Teacher

Beyond Sympathy | How a 20-Year-Old is Restoring Dignity on Our Streets 💜

2026-10-22T21:27:28.115+05:30

The Unseen Faces of Our Streets

A Freewheeling Conversation with Ms. Harini Nagarajan, II BA English, MCC

The ‘Safe Hands’ Initiative

In our faced-paced, everyday lives, it’s quite natural for any of us to quickly walk past the unseen and unheard thousands of hapless people in our society - the destitute, the abandoned, and the voiceless faces who are there on our streets without stay or support! The most we usually do, on such occasions, is to subtly offer a fleeting moment of sympathy before we continue to move on with our work!

Indeed, it takes a rare kind of courage and true nobility to pause, to listen, and to document the heartbreaking realities that such hapless residents of the streets face every passing day of their lives.

This is exactly what twenty-year-old Harini Nagarajan, the brain behind the noble initiative Safe Hands, has chosen to do. Armed with just a smartphone, her paltry monthly pocket money, and filled with a genuine and profound sense of empathy, Harini spends her weekends documenting the lives of those whom society has largely forgotten, on her vibrant Instagram page titled, ‘Safe Hands’.

Be it an elderly toy-seller left to starve by the very sons he sacrificed to educate, or physically challenged individuals struggling for basic medical care, Harini’s interventions transcend mere documentation. She seeks to restore their dignity, build a network of dedicated volunteers, and hold onto the hope of somehow rehabilitating them or reuniting them with their families.

In this candid, freewheeling conversation, that I had with Ms. Harini Nagarajan, today, we explore the spark and the drive behind her endeavour, and how these poignant interactions have shifted her perspective on the concept of ‘privilege’ in society, and her inspiring vision for the future.

And Ms. Harini was five minutes ahead of time for the interview session today.

Here goes snippets from the interview –

Very good afternoon Harini. We are so happy to see the noble work that you’re doing in the service of the needy, the destitute and the hapless people in society. Before you started out on this initiative of documenting the lives of such people, there must have been a moment of inspiration that made you take up this noble task. When exactly was the moment you got that spark?

Ms. Harini: Well, sir, for some people, there might have been a specific incident or event in their lives that provides them the spark, but for me, it is just in my nature. Ever since my childhood, I’ve been empathetic and I’ve always wanted to help people, sir. There was no single incident; I just do it out of genuine interest.

I constantly imagine myself in their situation and ask, “What if I were in their place and nobody was there to help me?”

There are thousands who sympathise with the helpless, but they usually just express pity and walk away. You had the courage to stop, pause, interact, and powerfully document their struggles. How did you find this courage?

Ms. Harini: To be honest, I receive a lot of negative comments. Even within my own circle, some friends claimed I was doing this just for publicity and views. I tell them that I only document these episodes with explicit permission. I make it clear to the people I document, that I am not just sympathising; I genuinely believe that posting these videos highlighting their plight, would sure encourage others to step forward and help them.

Moreover, I also hold onto a small hope that these videos will reach their families, and perhaps one day, they will reach out to reunite with them. I am focussed on transforming their lives through this documentation, not just gain views, sir.

That is a wonderful perspective. By now, you must have had numerous conversations with the neglected and the unheard people in society. Could you tell me one single conversation that touched or struck you the most?

Ms. Harini: Just two days ago, I met an elderly man, around 60 or 62, near the A2B restaurant in Tambaram. He was selling small toys. When I approached him to record snippets of his life, he gladly agreed, saying I was like a daughter to him, which made me very happy.

But the moment I asked his name, he broke down in tears. It was an incredibly emotional moment. Even as he cried, a crowd of auto drivers and workers gathered around us. He then slowly opened up and shared with me that he had educated all his sons with his hard-earned money, but now that they are married and working, they have abandoned him. He had been sitting there from 7:00 AM, and when we spoke at 7:00 PM, he had sold only one toy, earning a profit of just 50 rupees for the entire day.

His only thought was that he would have to go hungry again. When I gave him some money, he said, "நீங்க வந்து எனக்கு சாமி மாதிரி தெரியறீங்க!" (You look like a god to me), because he had thought he would be starving that night. Hearing those words made me cry too, and the auto drivers around us stepped in to comfort and motivate both of us.

How have these conversations shifted your perspective on the concept of privilege in our society?

Initially my mom was quite sceptical about helping people who are begging on the streets because she holds the common notion that some might be feigning poverty even while they are doing well otherwise. My dad is the exact opposite; he has this tendency to help everyone.

Very often I used to wonder if my mom was right. However, quite soon, when I started speaking directly with these people, I began to truly understand their struggles. I firmly believe that if we have something to spare, we must give it to the needy. I receive about 700 to 800 rupees a month as pocket money, and I spend it entirely on these destitute, voiceless, and abandoned individuals.

How do you find the time for this, Harini? When exactly do you do this documentation?

I mostly shoot the videos during the weekends. Right now, I am the only person running Safe Hands. I visit the locations, record the videos, edit them, and post them all by myself, sir. For the filming part, I reach out to friends, and if anyone is free, I request them to accompany me.

They say your tone creates the perfect empathetic mood for the viewer. Are there reliable friends who have the time and motivation to help you consistently?

Well, to be honest, not many are there, sir. That’s because they have their own priorities and commitments. In situations where I can’t find help, I feel quite helpless and usually have to postpone the shoot to another day.

What ultimate impact do you wish to make in society through your channel?

My aim and aspiration is that, these videos should reach a wide audience and build a strong connection among people. To achieve this, I want to build a network of volunteers who genuinely want to help. My greatest wish is to successfully reunite at least one family through this initiative.

Have you received any impactful, memorable messages or DMs in response to your work?

Yes, sir. There are lots of messages. Particularly, I would like to highlight on a girl from the Dept of Statistics, MCC, whom I don’t even know, who texted me expressing her strong interest in joining and helping me out. Many people also repost the videos and send supportive messages encouraging my work, sir.

Currently, Safe Hands is only on Instagram. Are you hoping to expand to YouTube later?

I definitely need to start, but it is a bit challenging to manage multiple platforms at once right now. I hope people use my current page as an inspiration to start helping others without hesitation.

Having met a wide cross-section of underprivileged individuals, who do you think are the worst affected and deserve the most empathy?

Ms. Harini: Honestly, all of them, sir. Every single person has a heartbreaking story. Two weeks ago, I met a physically challenged elderly man who had met with an accident and he didn’t even have the money to travel to a hospital. I gave him 100 rupees for an auto. Then there are those who have been abandoned by their own children and left on the roadside. My heart goes out to all of them.

Do these abandoned parents express resentment towards the children who abandoned them?

Yes, sir. Indeed they feel a deep sense of sorrow. They often tell me, “I sacrificed so much to educate them, but they have abandoned me.” To me, hearing such words is so disturbing and disappointing, sir. And because I am young, many of them feel as though their own children have returned in my form to help them.

Finally, what is your message to the people reading this interview?

Right now, my focus is on building a strong volunteer network and professionalising this initiative. Beyond reuniting families, I want to help place the elderly in good care homes. Since I am only 20, it is tough to establish contacts with NGOs and old age homes on my own. I would deeply appreciate assistance and guidance in this area.

What specific aspect of our society needs to change to eradicate this helplessness?

I personally feel that, instead of merely sympathising with them, we must take concrete, actionable steps to help them in whatever way we can. More importantly, we need to focus on rehabilitation - providing them with basic jobs to sustain a decent livelihood. On a fundamental level, we must teach our children never to abandon their parents in their old age.

Our best wishes to you in this noble endeavour, Harini. Thank you so much for taking the time to interview me.

Well, Harini’s journey with Safe Hands is indeed a great inspiration for all of us.

Her initiative trueproves the fact that, empathy is not merely about feeling sympathy; it is about showing up and being there for the needy and the hapless people out there on the streets, when they need us the most!

In a world that so easily looks the other way, her quiet dedication and resolve challenges us to pause and truly see the invisible struggles of the helpless and the hapless people on our own streets.

Indeed, it takes only a moment to ask a name, share a meal, or offer a listening ear, yet these small acts of dignity can mean the world to someone who has been entirely forgotten by society.

In the words of the American essayist, professor, philosopher, and poet – The Sage of Concord – Ralph Waldo Emerson,

The purpose of life is not to be happy. It is to be useful, to be honourable, to be compassionate, to have it make some difference that you have lived and lived well!

PS: You may want to check out Ms. Harini's Instagram Page HERE.

International Conference on Culinary Narratives ❤️

2026-10-21T14:24:14.944+05:30

Call for Papers: International Conference on Culinary Narratives

Shri Shankarlal Sundarbai Shasun Jain College for Women, Chennai

30th October 2026

Food is never just food. Every plate is political; it governs our senses and carries layered meanings. From shaping individual identities to driving aesthetic trends (like Instagram-worthy meals), every bite has a history.

If you’re fascinated by the stories of what we eat, what it’s called, who eats it, and how it reaches us, we have an exciting opportunity for you!

The Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC), Department of English (Shift I) & Department of B.A. English (Shift II) at Shri Shankarlal Sundarbai Shasun Jain College for Women, in collaboration with LangLit: An International Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal, is organising an International Conference on Culinary Narratives: History, Language, Politics, and Aesthetics of Food.

This conference will serve as a platform to trace the history of cuisines as registers of migration, conflict, and exchange, as well as an inquiry into the linguistics of taste.

Event Details

• Date: 30th October, 2026

• Time: 9:00 AM - 4:00 PM

• Mode: Hybrid Mode (Online & Offline options available)

Sub-Themes

We invite insightful papers that fall under the following categories (but are not limited to) -

• Class, caste and taste

• National cuisines and “authentic” food

• Hybrid kitchens

• Festivals, fasts and feast

• Food on screen

• Advertising and appetite

• Food and resistance

• Sensory anthropology

• Who cooks, who eats

• Gender, labour in the kitchen

• Food as memory and identity

• Diaspora, migration, and food

• Food and culture

• Nostalgia cooking

• Food and visual politics

• Food justice

• Health, diet, and morality

Submission Guidelines

• Abstracts: 350 words or less.

• Full paper: 2500-3000 words.

• Email Submissions to: seic2026@shasuncollege.edu.in

• Format: MS Word, Times New Roman, font size 12, Double spacing. Title and Subheadings should be font size 14. Follow MLA 9th edition.

• Header Format: Paper title, Author(s) Name and Affiliation, Contact Number, and E-mail address must be in ALL CAPS, bold and centred (Times New Roman, font size - 12).

• Presentation Format: 5-7 mins per paper; PPT should not be more than 10 slides.

• Note: Procedures for publication will be shared in a designated WhatsApp Group. Each author and co-author needs to register and pay separately.

Registration Fees

Category Offline Online

Participation Rs. 100 Rs. 100

Presentation Rs. 350 Rs. 250

Publication (Post-acceptance) - Rs. 800 (Overall)

How to Register

Avian Beauties Today 💚

2026-10-20T22:06:18.187+05:30

#intothewildwithrufus #birding

October Delights 💚

2026-10-19T22:16:00.000+05:30

#intothewildwithrufus #birding

Rendezvous with our Feathered Friends Today 💚

2026-10-19T22:02:00.000+05:30