JP Blog

Cristal

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Sat, 5 Sep 2026 10:43:00 +0200

El cristal es algo que, según su estado, puede ser tan translúcido que nos deja ver a través de él —aunque de cerca y con atención podemos notarlo—. Es un sólido que deja pasar la luz casi al cien por cien; si podemos verlo, es porque algo en su estructura aún retiene una pequeña parte de ella.

El cristal es transparente, pero puede no serlo del todo. Tiene de ambas cualidades, aunque se incline más hacia un lado. Creo que fue con un prisma con el que se demostró que la luz blanca se descompone en varios colores. Hay tantas cosas que ya no recuerdo, muchas más que no sé y que la humanidad sí conoce, y cuántas más aún por descubrir.

Los cristales se utilizan en tantos productos de nuestro día a día que ya ni lo notamos: monitores, ventanas, relojes, bombillas. Pero esto me lleva a pensar en cuánto plástico hay que parece cristal y se usa en su lugar —porque muchas bombillas, paneles de iluminación, lunas de relojes, pantallas, protectores de pantallas e incluso algunas ventanas son en realidad plástico—.

Muchas de las cosas que pueden parecernos cristal son plástico fabricado con ese fin: imitar al cristal permitiendo el paso de la luz. Tal vez ocurre lo mismo con otras cosas que creemos son transparentes pero son imitaciones.

Contrast

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Thu, 3 Sep 2026 10:40:00 +0200

Like yin and yang, we need at least two contrasting parts. Many things and situations may appear contradictory, but they can coexist — and the contrast between them is what gives each meaning.

Another way to express something similar is the saying about having a right hand and a left hand: a way of saying we need to be both hard and soft, strict and flexible, tight and loose. I also think of an accelerator and a brake. We should not always be speeding up — we could crash. But we should not always be pressing the brake either, because then we will not progress. I relate this to conservatives and progressives: right and left. We need both. We need that contrast. All changes cannot and should not happen too fast.

I think humankind is evolving and progressing, whilst at the same time taking steps back. But that is our design, our way of working — and it is part of nature. Our nature.

So the next time you think conservatives or progressives are idiots who should not exist, ask yourself: do we need them? They can be your children, your parents, any relative. And think about ourselves too — because we can be conservative about some things and progressive about others, just as we can be introverted and extroverted. Think of a scale from minus ten to ten — minus ten being pure progressivism, ten being pure conservatism. Nobody lives at the extremes. Most of us sit somewhere in the middle, and we move across that space depending on the question, the decade, the fear we carry that day.

Postizos

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Tue, 1 Sep 2026 09:46:00 +0200

Los personajes que llegan a ganar fama y convertirse en ídolos de muchos, cuando existen injusticias, guerras y genocidios, se ven arrastrados hacia uno de los bandos —lo quieran o no—. Incluso si intentan mantenerse neutrales, pueden ser utilizados. Y si continúan siendo parte de esa manipulación, lo que empezó como algo pasajero y ambiguo se convierte en un apoyo claro y significativo a la parte manipuladora.

Hay pueblos, hay niños, que tienen como ídolo y héroe a una persona que les muestra simpatía. Pero son héroes postizos: porque también simpatizan con los opresores de esos mismos pueblos, con quienes permiten que esos niños mueran. Muestran con su silencio y su falta de distanciamiento que, o bien apoyan a los opresores, o simplemente quieren vivir en su burbuja —y el resto les importa poco o nada—. Tal vez ayudan a algunos porque queda bien. O son simplemente apáticos. Y mientras no les afecte directamente, no reaccionarán.

¿Puedes estar en contra sin decir nada? Sí: puedes mantenerte aislado en tu burbuja. Sería como un héroe con poderes que no los usa para ayudar —porque teme perder sus privilegios, o porque simplemente es un héroe postizo—. Puede parecerlo, puede fingirlo, puede tener momentos: pero no lo es.

Incapable

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Sat, 29 Aug 2026 09:43:06 +0200

Sometimes we can feel incapable of doing something. Sometimes we suffer from impostor syndrome — we think and believe we are not the right person, that we lack the skills. When we face a new situation where we feel we lack information or experience, that feeling arises naturally. But as when we learn to drive: we may be ready for the exam even when we have doubts, and our instructor tells us we are ready — yet we think we are not. We just have to try.

We can pass the exam and then, day by day, face new difficulties and feel we should not have passed. But we must remember that every master was once incapable of doing things that later became second nature. Psychologists describe four stages of learning — and the hardest is the second: knowing what you do not yet know. That is where impostor syndrome lives.

Sometimes our instinct is right, and sometimes it is wrong. And sometimes it is the instinct of our instructor that is right. We might think: I know myself better — but the instructor knows better because they have seen many people in situations similar to ours. Wisdom is to be humble and learn from others. We must learn when to do that.

In summary: we may be incapable at the beginning, and that must not stop us from trying. If after trying long enough we are still incapable, we must identify what we need in order to become capable — and act. If we have to step aside, we do it. But we must also remember that everyone makes mistakes. We take accountability and fix them — and that is what distinguishes us from someone truly incapable of admitting mistakes, let alone solving them.

Wealth

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Thu, 27 Aug 2026 21:47:00 +0200

We can think about wealth from different perspectives.

1. Physical.
This is the material world — physical money, gold, things that allow us to exchange goods. But from this also emerges the accumulation of wealth: first as prevention against hard times, then, taken further, as greed — a tendency that leads to wars and inequality. And inequality is harmful not in itself, but when it damages others. This is not about prohibiting differences between people: everyone has different skills and excels in certain areas. In that sense, everyone is equal — good at something and less good at something else.

2. Mental.
Wealth in the mental area would be having received a good education that gives us the skills and knowledge to sustain ourselves and contribute value to the world. But that knowledge must also lead us to wisdom — and wisdom gives us mental peace. That is a form of wealth money cannot buy.

3. Spiritual.
Wealth in the spiritual realm is finding God. Because true spirituality cannot be found as a group — the connection, the awakening, the growth, the experience, is individual. Personality is individual. Therefore, we can only find the ultimate connection as individuals. And as individuals we must discover that the outside is as the inside, that we are the same light — and that at the same time we form a whole conscious being made of unique personalities. That is the highest wealth.

Sudor

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Tue, 25 Aug 2026 21:38:00 +0200

Ganarse el pan con el sudor de la frente. Es una frase que hace referencia a ganarse la vida con el trabajo propio. Esto debe hacernos reflexionar sobre los mecanismos de prestar dinero y exigir que, además de lo prestado, se devuelva un extra. En la antigüedad esto se veía mal por ciertos grupos, que llegaron incluso a prohibirlo en sus sagradas escrituras. Pero como la codicia y el interés material priman sobre todo lo demás, si hace falta se crea una nueva religión, unas nuevas sagradas escrituras que admitan los nuevos intereses. Así actúa el poder de la codicia: el querer ganar más, ya no solo con el sudor de la frente sino, si es posible, con las vidas y el trabajo de otros. Y se renombra como trabajo el hecho de prestar riqueza, de usar contactos, de esclavizar, de matar, de oprimir, de seguir órdenes malvadas.

El sudor de la frente deja de ser algo moralmente admirable, algo deseable, algo digno de imitar. Pero es precisamente ahí —en el acto de servir al otro con el propio esfuerzo— donde se expresa el verdadero amor. Y es ahí donde encontraremos la belleza, donde la verdad y el amor se unen.

El sudor de la frente no es una condena: es una dignidad. Y lavar los pies del otro es el sudor más noble de todos. Seamos capaces de lavar los pies de los demás. Seamos capaces de entender que no hay jerarquías, razas ni religiones cuando se trata de servir, de amar, de seguir el camino de la verdad.

Lento

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Thu, 20 Aug 2026 21:32:00 +0200

Moverse no es lo mismo que avanzar. Y quedarse quieto no es lo mismo que estar a salvo. Qué lento parece que avanzamos a veces. Incluso hay momentos en que parece que damos dos pasos adelante y uno atrás —en el mejor de los casos—. Y en tiempos de gran turbulencia, parece que retrocedemos mucho más de lo que se había avanzado.

Se suele decir que cada uno tiene su tiempo —una forma de decir que cada uno avanza a su ritmo—. Puede que haya verdad en eso, pero también puede llevar a la inactividad y a la indiferencia: no tomamos acción. Y sí, tal vez tomamos acción solo cuando la gota derrama el vaso, cuando la necesidad o el agobio se vuelven tan insoportables que al fin te mueves —pero desde la desesperación y una posición débil, no desde una más fuerte—.

Hay que ir despacio para no estrellarse. Y aún así podemos estrellarnos. La idea no es no estrellarse: es disminuir la probabilidad, y si ocurre, que sea leve. Incluso sin moverte, algo puede estrellarse contra ti. No estamos solos, ni estamos del todo quietos.

El punto es tomar responsabilidad y movernos con propósito, no por inercia. Puede que a veces lo hagamos por inercia —porque estamos aprendiendo, porque estamos pasando de ser guiados a tomar el control, o porque nos tomamos una especie de pausa—. Pero eso sería mejor si fuese por decisión propia: en ese caso, la inercia misma se convierte en propósito. Somos experiencia, y eso en sí es movimiento en el tiempo.

Cluster

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Tue, 18 Aug 2026 21:22:00 +0200

I have heard a cluster of ideas that serve as a mental model. There are four, and if I remember correctly they are:

1. Reality over idea, or reality over theory. This is about staying close to the real — touching it, being present, putting things into practice. You can hear about something, but experiencing it directly is something else entirely.

2. Union over conflict. This is about joining things, people, humanity, cultures — including, sharing, becoming stronger together. At its core, this is about love.

3. The whole over the part. This is about understanding that we are part of a whole, and that the whole matters more than any single part. We see this principle repeatedly in cases where one person or a few sacrifice themselves for the many — and we admire that bravery and recognise it as an act of love.

4. Time over space. This is about processes that take time — about evolution, improvement, and cycles that do not become toxic but instead become cycles of growth. And it stands against the impulse to take and hold spaces, to conquer land. That impulse leads to patriotism taken too far, nationalism, racism, fascism, war, genocide.

These principles I heard from Pope Francis. He said they help him understand countries, cultures, and religions. He defends integration. And I think they align with the Golden Rule — they align with the purpose of loving, serving, and seeking truth.

Stage

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Fri, 14 Aug 2026 21:15:00 +0200

Parliament is a stage — and like all stages, what matters is not the truth but the performance. Parliament seems like a stage where the aim is either to defend everything the government does or to oppose everything it does. I think this is a problem that thinkers noticed as far back as ancient Greece. Leaders are not necessarily the smartest or the most suited to govern — whether by their morals or their skills. The skill that matters most is the ability to convince people. You can lie or simply complain; if you convince people, that is enough.

And those who are powerful in resources but lack that ability themselves can simply buy it. They can be the very company that oppresses workers whilst maintaining good public relations — and also funding the NGO that fights them. This sounds ironic, but they manage everything they can. And greed has no end.

Because sooner or later, those in power fight amongst themselves — when there is an overproduction of elites, or when their interests come into conflict. And the pawns are the rest of us. Seen this way, everything can be read as a stage where everyone is playing their character in a play called life.

Fama

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Thu, 13 Aug 2026 21:14:40 +0200

La fama es un amplificador. No cambia lo que eres: solo lo hace más grande. La fama puede tener sus beneficios y sus desventajas. En ambos casos se debe tener en cuenta la responsabilidad: en los beneficios, para no llegar a herir a otros; en las desventajas, para no herirte principalmente a ti mismo.

La fama trae la responsabilidad de ser un ejemplo. Cada persona ya lo es para otras, quiéranlo o no. Con la fama esto se incrementa y puede desbordarte —más aún si eres una persona inmadura, si careces de principios y valores que te sirvan de guía, o si no tienes un propósito claro—.

La fama conlleva también la responsabilidad de ser una voz que defienda las causas justas, porque tu luz influye mucho más en los demás.

Puedes tratar de alejarte de la fama, y está bien. Así como está bien abrazarla y sobrellevarla mientras creces. Que esté bien equivocarse no debe convertirse en justificación para no esforzarse en evitarlo.

La fama es una herramienta, un amplificador. Qué vas a amplificar es cosa tuya. Si será algo bueno o malo es tu decisión —como en cada acción de la vida—. No es algo con lo que creerse superior a los demás, ni con lo que empequeñecerse por verlo como algo grandioso. Es algo pasajero, como la vida misma en este gran universo.

Face

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Thu, 6 Aug 2026 21:40:00 +0200

People try to change their faces, but the results can be perceived very differently. Some changes come across as comic or unnatural — and some people look for exactly that, whilst others perhaps do not intend it. I prefer the natural look: improvements that leave the face appearing as though nothing artificial was done. Whether it is make-up, surgery, injectables, or other techniques I am not familiar with, the ideal for everyday style is to wear it and not appear to be wearing anything at all. Seeing a face that is obviously made up is one thing; wearing make-up that seems invisible — that is something else entirely.

I am not sure whether make-up is strictly necessary on television due to lighting or other factors. Perhaps not, and it has simply become the norm even when it is not strictly needed.

We should also bear in mind that faces differ due to age, ethnicity, diet, and environment. In recent decades we see faces that look younger compared with photographs of people of the same age from fifty or more years ago. Beyond genetics, we see someone of sixty who looks forty, or someone of fifty who looks thirty or forty.

I think we can improve our appearance through knowledge of nutrition, exercise, and certain products — but the goal should be to maintain a natural look rather than a comic one. The best improvement, in a face or anywhere else, is the one that leaves no trace of itself — only the result. And the best things a face can have are a genuine smile and shining eyes.

Quarrel

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Tue, 4 Aug 2026 21:24:00 +0200

Sometimes we avoid quarrels, and sometimes — perhaps — we should experience them. I think they are more likely to happen if you grow up in an immature environment. I am not used to them myself. I have seen them treated as normal behaviour in some families. And it is possible that some would say they are fine — the way insulting rivals in stadiums is considered normal, or the way some friends greet each other with insults. But are those really quarrels? They may appear that way because of the intensity, but I understand a real quarrel as something different: a genuine lack of manners and restraint — being truly angry, heated, because you have been suppressing emotions.

Like a glass of water filled drop by drop until it overflows — the drop that spills the glass is not just a drop. It is the only one you see, but it is there because of all the ones contained before it. That is the analogy for when someone says something cruel or impolite and claims it was the heat of the moment: it is because there is more of that inside. If you see hatred or racism surface, there is more where it came from. Is that always the case? I do not know — but it may well be, and there are probably studies on it.

We should experience quarrels when we are exploring our limits — when we are growing up — because they help us know ourselves better. But not as something that happens every week or month.

Tell

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Thu, 30 Jul 2026 21:10:00 +0200

Telling stories is how people shared knowledge, wisdom, and morals. Before writing, people only had stories to tell. And those stories could be different each time someone told them. Yes, people can memorise stories — but is it not better to transmit feelings and connect with your audience by adapting the story to them?

I always remember an exercise we did at school. Four classmates were chosen and taken out of the classroom. One of them read a short story aloud to those remaining inside, and then told it — not read it — to one of the classmates waiting outside, without the others hearing. That second classmate came in and told us the story: it was already slightly different. Then the second told it to the third, and so the process repeated. By the third retelling the story had changed noticeably, and by the time the fourth told it, it was completely different. This exercise helped us understand that stories can change — and distort — their original meaning with each retelling.

Psychologists call this the telephone effect — each retelling introduces small changes that compound into something unrecognisable. And that is one reason why stories like those in the Bible may contain inconsistencies or contradictions. Also because the way people communicated in ancient times was often more metaphorical or mystical. Should we take those stories literally? I would say no — and I would argue that we have been given the capacity to think and discern precisely so that we do not.

Roll

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:00:00 +0200

Many times we fall into a loop where we roll through the same thoughts again and again. We may change the stories, the scenarios, the context — but I think we stay in the same roll until we unroll it. And this roll is something we must process, something we must face without avoiding — we must look at it directly and understand it. It may mean taking a step forward in order to mature and gain wisdom.

It is possible, yes, to set it aside for a while — to think about other things, or to let our subconscious work on the solution whilst our conscious mind focuses on other activities, or simply rests. That can be important when we are stuck and cannot see a way out. But sooner or later we must always face it: everything unresolved will be with us for the rest of our lives. The answer is not to stop thinking about it, but to think about it differently.

And we carry many rolls through our lives. Some we unroll and resolve, and new ones can form. We must learn to manage how we respond — to avoid creating those harmful rolls that hold guilt and fear in place. We must work through our own first before trying to help others. Our experience can be valuable, but remember: not everyone is ready to deal with theirs. Some need a push; others need time.

Peinado

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Sun, 26 Jul 2026 20:57:45 +0200

Un peinado puede cambiar mucho el aspecto de una persona: el color, la forma, la textura. Un peinado puede ser una distinción cultural —como ocurre con las mujeres africanas o de origen africano en distintos países, que acostumbran a crear peinados elaborados y llenos de significado—. Incluso personas ajenas a esa cultura pueden sentirse atraídas y probar dichos peinados. A la gente le gustan otras culturas, y la comida, la vestimenta, los rituales o los peinados son formas de intercambio cultural, de apreciar lo que otros han construido.

Un peinado puede ser una marca de pertenencia a un grupo. Puede ser una protesta, un acto de rebeldía. Puede ser un acto de amor —una forma de decir sé que te gusta esto y lo hago por ti—. Puede ser para gustar a otros o simplemente para gustarse a uno mismo.

Los peinados se adaptan, los peinados cambian. Y en ese sentido pueden ser un reflejo del estado interno de la persona. Como los peinados, debemos aprender a no apegarnos —a entender que son pasajeros—, y podemos incluso disfrutar de que nuestro «peinado» sea la calvicie. Los hombres pueden jugar a crear distintos «peinados» con la barba. El peinado es una metáfora de la vida: no se trata de los recursos que tienes, sino de lo que haces con ellos. Y a veces, lo más elegante es abrazar lo que ya tienes.

Hen

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Sun, 19 Jul 2026 09:27:00 +0200

I am not sure whether in English the expression is literally the hen that laid the golden eggs — but its short story teaches us to take care of the hen, to let it keep giving us golden eggs. If we slip into greed, we end up killing the hen to get the eggs she might have inside. And once she is dead, she can give us no more.

Perhaps that is the greatest problem of humankind: not following the Golden Rule — greed. Investors do not want to pay fair salaries; they want to extract more and more money in exchange for their money. They do not produce. They lend money and claim interest. They may try to justify this — and self-deceive — by arguing that they help society by funding companies. And some do try. But in general, are they trying to improve the lives of employees, or to satisfy investors? Where is the most money made? Is it not in war? Is it not in exploiting natural resources, avoiding due process, and paying no taxes? Is it not in granting mortgages where, if people cannot pay, they lose the house and still carry the debt? That is not helping people. It is exploiting them. It is not following the Golden Rule — unless you do not love your parents, your children, your brothers and sisters, yourself. You are exploiting the hen. And without people, you have no money.

Elecciones

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:21:00 +0200

Así como los computadores se vuelven más eficientes, el sistema estatal debería hacer lo mismo. Se aplica ingeniería para mejorar tecnologías y métodos en las distintas áreas, y hay avances constantes. ¿Qué ingeniería se aplica para mejorar los procesos estatales? ¿Cómo se mejoran las elecciones? Algunos países tienen distintos sistemas de asignación de escaños, algunos implementan el voto electrónico o mantienen el voto por correo, pero muy pocos —o ninguno— experimentan cambios de mayor calado: cambios que respondan a problemas reales como la insatisfacción con todos los candidatos, la necesidad de diferenciar el rechazo de la aprobación, o la dificultad de formar mayorías que eviten el bloqueo del gobierno.

Una de las situaciones que más llama la atención es caer en la percepción de que todos son iguales, de que las elecciones son un circo y da igual quién gane. Ante eso, debemos hacer algo para cambiar la dinámica. Al mismo tiempo, se genera una cultura de rechazo y estigmatización de la política como algo sucio —y por eso las personas de bien no se ven entrando en ella—.

Las elecciones deben mejorarse para reflejar mejor el sentir del soberano y darle una opción real de reciclar los partidos políticos. Las primarias actuales mantienen a los dirigentes en el poder, y en varios partidos se puede observar cómo llevan toda una vida enquistados: el partido se convierte en el partido del líder, en un cacicazgo, una mafia, una dictadura interna. Nadie aceptaría un computador que funciona igual que hace cincuenta años. ¿Por qué aceptamos un sistema electoral que sí lo hace?

Batalla

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:17:00 +0200

Tenemos una batalla que parece perdida: la batalla contra quienes buscan poder y entienden que solo mediante él consiguen su propósito en la vida, que es tener más y más poder. ¿Cómo ganas una batalla contra quien tiene poder y tú no lo quieres?

Hay distintas formas de entender el poder. Podríamos usar las tres áreas de desarrollo: físico, mental y espiritual.

El poder físico —ya sea la fuerza pública o los mercenarios— responde en última instancia al poder financiero, que tiene por lo general más influencia que el poder social o político, los cuales también responden al financiero. El poder mental —sea este el conocimiento o la información— está igualmente subordinado al poder financiero: las corporaciones financian, compran y controlan mediante patentes, o absorben a las pequeñas empresas. Usan el poder político y manipulan el social. El poder espiritual, entendido como la religión de rituales, está también contaminado y manipulado por los poderosos. Las religiones, en nombre de Dios, han generado guerras, se han enriquecido y han puesto y quitado gobernantes.

En tiempos más recientes puede parecer que quienes desean controlarlo todo han perdido parte de ese poder en lo religioso. De hecho, se dice que las iglesias evangélicas, entre otras, sirven precisamente para mantener el control: profetizan el individualismo, el éxito material y el amor al dinero. Sus seguidores no reflexionan sobre cuánto tienen de espiritual —poco o nada—.

El despertar espiritual es lo que mantiene libres a los seres humanos, lo que es capaz de unirlos e influir en la lucha en los planos mental y físico. Entonces: ¿cómo ganas esa batalla? No queriendo el poder que ellos quieren, sino despertando al poder que ellos no pueden comprar.

Autógrafo

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Sun, 12 Jul 2026 11:37:00 +0200

No he pensado mucho en la idea de los autógrafos. Entiendo que una dedicatoria tiene algo más —unas palabras, algo que se dice—. Un autógrafo es solo una firma, un garabato que dice: firmado por mí, yo toqué esto. Tal vez en el pasado servía como forma de poder demostrar a otros que estuviste con esa persona, como si fuera un certificado. Con la facilidad de la fotografía, muchos piden ahora una foto juntos como recuerdo del encuentro, en lugar del autógrafo.

Algunos hacen negocio de los autógrafos. ¡Joder, a todo le quieren sacar ventaja económica! Maldito amor al dinero. Siguiendo con la idea del certificado —con la que me quedo—: es un certificado de autenticidad.

En fin, los autógrafos son de esas cosas que no les veo mucho sentido. Puede que mi perspectiva esté sesgada, pero ¿sesgada por qué? ¿Yo lo haría? Una vez me pidieron que añadiera mi firma a un libro que regalaba. Me pareció una tontería innecesaria, pero la añadí por cortesía. Tal vez lo volvería a hacer por cortesía —como forma de devolver el aprecio sin negar una petición que tampoco parece dañina—. Pero dejar de verlo como una tontería, eso no sé. Le veo mayor sentido a una dedicatoria: unas palabras, no solo una firma.

Reservoir

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Thu, 9 Jul 2026 11:25:00 +0200

When I started taking care of my finances — during my university years — building a reservoir was part of it. It was the second step, a natural consequence of managing the first step well. The first step was to divide my income into six percentages assigned to six accounts — this can be kept abstract, differentiating them on paper only: 1) 50% for basics, to spend on essential things such as food and rent; 2) 10% for financial freedom, or long-term savings — this functions as a retirement fund and works best when invested; 3) 10% for short-term savings, to be used for holidays, a new phone or car, repairs, or clothing if basic needs require it; 4) 10% for education, to be spent on books, courses, and anything related to learning; 5) 10% for enjoyment — drinks, cinema, a dinner that goes beyond the basics; 6) 10% for debt repayment — which was not much — and once the debt was cleared, this account became the fund for giving gifts to others.

At the beginning, my income was so small that I often had to take money from one account to cover the purpose of another — drawing from savings or education to cover something basic. But over time, as my income grew, the 50% for basics began to build a reservoir. The initial goal was to reach three months of average monthly expenditure. A few years later, I reduced the percentage to 40% and raised the goal to nine months of average monthly expenditure.

Rogar

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Tue, 7 Jul 2026 11:17:00 +0200

El que no llora no mama. ¿Habéis escuchado este dicho? Me hace pensar en que uno no sabe pedir lo que quiere —como los bebés—. Lloras, y ese llanto puede ser por hambre o por distintas razones, ya que no puedes comunicar más allá del llanto. Y una de las primeras cosas que se puede pensar es que el bebé tiene hambre, así que se le da de mamar.

A mí no me gusta la frase porque me hace pensar en que lo que se consigue con ella es una cantidad de llorones. Gente que, en vez de preguntar de forma constructiva —aportando contexto e incluso posibles soluciones—, o de pedir, o de reclamar con argumentos, simplemente se queja. Prácticamente lloros, berrinches.

De hecho, la democracia parece tener entre sus desventajas la de promover precisamente eso. Si nos fijamos en las distintas democracias del mundo, los partidos que no gobiernan parecieran tener como papel el de atacar al gobierno y hacer berrinches, más que el de rogar, proponer o construir. De hecho se les llama «oposición» y, como tal, se oponen a todo. ¿No os parece un fallo estructural del sistema?

O al menos eso es lo que muestran públicamente, porque luego los repartos y acuerdos pueden darse según convenga al bolsillo particular. El problema es la codicia, la falta de coherencia e integridad, y la falta de transparencia. Y el sistema no ayuda, más bien parece sustentarlo. Y así, el que no llora no mama, y los que más lloran, gobiernan. Hasta que aprendamos a pedir en lugar de berrinchear, el sistema seguirá siendo de los que más ruido hacen.

Drama

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Sun, 5 Jul 2026 11:15:46 +0200

There is a saying that goes something like: he who does not cry does not get fed — or does not get what he wants. And the underlying sense — that fighting for what you want is acceptable — is fair enough. But I think some people take it in the direction of drama.

Have you seen people who complain about everything? They are walking drama. They seem to compete over who has the most to suffer. They seem to expect pity. They cry over everything. Whether it is that no one helps them, or that their job makes them miserable, or that they cannot find work, or that some illness prevents them from working — they always have a story about how badly things are going.

I think we must learn how to ask for what we want and how to say what we do not want. But alongside knowing how to be assertive, we must also be positive — accepting the good things, learning to see them. We must appreciate what we already have, and if we want something more, work towards it and enjoy the journey. We must not be the toxic people who make a drama of their lives and play the victim indefinitely.

Verdes

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Sat, 27 Jun 2026 11:29:00 +0200

Me gustan las colinas verdes. Salir a caminar por el campo y verlas es hermoso. Llenan de energía positiva; la experiencia es relajante, elevada en una especie de deleite ante la belleza. Agrada como ver algo bonito, bueno, dulce —en el sentido de amable, delicado—. Es como ver a un ser amado. Es paz, serenidad, tranquilidad. Te arranca suspiros. Te eleva mental y espiritualmente.

A veces ese verde me resulta hermoso también en la vestimenta, sobre todo en mujeres cuando el color les sienta de una forma que realza aún más su belleza. No es, sin embargo, un color con el que yo me sienta cómodo vistiéndolo. De niño no me gustó mucho y desde entonces lo he evitado —al igual que el amarillo, el rojo y el naranja—.

Unos ojos verdes son de mis favoritos. Llaman mucho mi atención. Me producen ganas de detenerme a observarlos como observaría unas colinas verdes: perderme en los detalles, perderme en esa sensación de paz, belleza y admiración.

Verdes tus ojos me gustaría que fuesen. Pero sé que igualmente, sea cual sea el color que resplandezca en ellos, admiraré esos ojos que me enloquecen.

Protest

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Fri, 26 Jun 2026 11:01:00 +0200

We assume that words mean the same thing to everyone. In courtrooms, that assumption can put innocent people in prison.

People protest when there is injustice. And I wonder what we understand by injustice — because we must always remember that language is ambiguous, and that meaning depends on the experience of the person.

Words mean different things with different nuances. When we communicate, we must keep this in mind in order to understand better — whether we are the sender or the receiver of the message.

I remember a case where an elderly man killed an intruder in his home. He shot him. People protested on social media in the old man's favour. But the prosecutor was able to make the old man say that he had not been afraid — and that was decisive. The prosecutor needed to prove two things: first, that there was a meaningful disadvantage between the two — the old man had a rifle whilst the intruder may have had only a knife; second, that since the old man said he was not afraid, he was not in danger.

But what does it mean to be afraid? I strongly believe it is not the same for an old man raised to think that a real man does not feel fear — or at least does not admit it — as it is for a man of the twenty-first century who may have been taught that feeling fear is acceptable and worth naming. Both may have the same chemical reaction in the body, the same alert state activated. Both can be brave. But one identifies bravery with the absence of fear, whilst the other understands it as fear acknowledged — fear that activates the stress response and drives them to defend themselves or flee. To be fair, then, we must understand the limitations of how people express themselves — because in this case, the way a man described his own feelings put him behind bars. And that is unjust.

Leg

noreply@blogger.com (JP) — Wed, 24 Jun 2026 10:34:00 +0200

It is interesting how different legs are between men and women. There is a different structural design in the two, and we can see similar differences elsewhere in nature. In the case of humans, women tend to have more mass at the bottom and men at the top. In general, women's legs tend to be proportionally larger than men's.

Why might this be? There must be an evolutionary reason. We can form hypotheses, but as with many things, these must be accepted as provisional truths until new knowledge emerges. And that last point, I think, is always worth remembering.

I am reminded of a moment at university when a classmate was giving a presentation and said that neurons die and no new ones can form. The teacher interrupted and said that his source was probably an old textbook — because that was what people once believed, but it had since been discovered that new neurons can in fact form.

We study based on old information, and teachers either cannot keep up with current knowledge or they lack real experience — repeating only what they have read, not necessarily what they have lived. We must always be cautious about what is considered truth today, because tomorrow it may be expanded and transformed into a richer truth. This is what I call provisional truth.