The Department of Louise

It's not reporting; it's creative writing

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:39:00 +0000

This story from the AP has a provocative headline, sure to appeal to the traditionalists: "Study Links Child Care To Problem Behavior." The study is a longitudinal one, looking at over 1300 children, and one would guess that it would concern parents whose children regularly spend some time in someone else's care.

Except the study draws this conclusion (reported by the writer, Kevin Freking, in the 5th paragraph):

The researchers said the increase in vocabulary and problem behaviors was small, and that parenting quality was a much more important predictor of child development.

and in the 10th paragraph:

The authors emphasized that the children's behavior was within a normal range and that it would be impossible to go into a classroom, and with no additional information, pick out those who had been in child care.

Of course, that doesn't make a provocative story, so Kevin, or his editor, got creative.

Ethics, schmethics.

Yeah, that'll fix 'em.

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:45:00 +0000

U.S. Bans Sale of iPods to North Korea

Our Top Story Tonight...

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 04:03:00 +0000

There is lots of news my local news stations can cover in their 22 minutes minus sports minus weather. National news, world news, local news; war, the economy, even entertainment. So why is one of my local stations teasing this story: "How do you get to heaven?"

I give up. Really.

OJ may have thought it was about OJ...

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:19:00 +0000

...but it was always All About Judith.

All the proof anyone will need is the inevitable exclusive interview that someone will get with Judith, and -- I'm guessing -- Judith's book about the whole sorry affair (under the guise of what she says is her own abuse history).

The whole lot of 'em should go back to the putrid slime in the fetid puddle under the rock they crawled out from.

Louise Approves

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:32:00 +0000

This?

This is what Dave meant when he created The Department of Louise.

Good. We need to police ourselves.

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 01:50:00 +0000

Cheers to the TPMmuckraker folks who are already on the case of potential corruption in the Democratic Leadership ranks. I can't speak for anyone else, but I didn't vote Dem just so they could be the ones to dip into the till.

They all want in on the grooming.

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:14:00 +0000

Look who was front and just off center today at the Dem's announcement about open and honest government. If hard work and long service to the cause counted for anything, my boyfriend, Henry Waxman (whose shiny pate is just visible) would be up there, but instead it's Our Future Savior, Barak Obama.

Don't get me wrong, I'm still a big fan. It's just amusing to see how quickly he's become part of the "face" of the party. They know a good thing when they see it, and they want to stand next to it.

Also, note the more senior black congressman on the right. Don't you love the look he's giving The Youngster?

A little symbolism for your election day results...

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:29:00 +0000

Woman Fatally Bitten by Snake in Church.

It's all incestuous, but I guess it could be worse.

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:22:00 +0000

Ok, Rumsfeld out, Gates (circa PapaBush) in. Gotta be better, right? He's not going to sell arms to the insurgents, right? (No need -- we're givin' 'em away!)

Inspiring...and heartbreaking.

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:18:00 +0000

Wow. What a photograph. (No not the icon. The one at the link!)

Let's remember we demanded this change, in large part, for them.

Do it right.

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:35:00 +0000

The Democratic leadership puts representation from both parties in conference.
The Democratic leadership has a functioning, effective ethics investigation process.
The Democratic leadership does not hold votes open in violation of rules.
The Democratic leadership puts fiscal responsibility ahead of pork.

Every one of these statements had better turn out to be true. We must be different than our predecessors.

Sic 'em, Henry!

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:33:00 +0000

Give 'em hell!

Secretary Lieberman

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:25:00 +0000

I think Tim F. has this one exactly right: Bush will offer Lieberman the SecDef job, Lieberman will lap it up, and Jodi Rell will appoint a Republican. Presto: even with Tester and Webb wins, we're back to 50-50 with Cheney as the swing vote. I wouldn't be surprised to learn this has been in the works since Lieberman lost the primary.

And then we'll just see what Hillary and Chuck and Harry say about that.

Beyond Unacceptable

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:53:00 +0000

It's the lead diary at Kos right now, and no wonder: Camp Pendleton families accepting donations of food. It's true, and it's not an isolated case. Follow the link. This should be a national story.

To everyone's relief, Riverbend posted again, and she makes the most important point about the Lancet study of Iraqi deaths: what does it matter if 600,000 is twice the actual number -- how is 300,000 deaths acceptable?

David Kuo, interviewed on Fresh Air yesterday, said that Chuck Colson -- back in the Nixon days -- observed that Evangelican Christians were the easiest group for the White House to influence/manipulate, and that he had decided that this was because they were the most succeptible to the lure of power.
It's not true of everyone, but it is true some of the time. Once again, evidence that some folks are not reading their *New* Testament.

Interesting Timing

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:27:00 +0000

It's interesting that yesterday, John Edwards suddenly popped up on Kos with a "let's talk" diary, and today, Mark Warner has announced he's not going to run for President.

Is Wanting to Strangle The Christian Right a Sin?

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:57:00 +0000

AAAUUUGGGHHH!!!

I'm not screaming about whether or not Christian Right-ers want to blame the House leadership in addition to Mark Foley. I'm fine with anyone who wants to see "where the investigation" leads, though I think they're going to be disappointed.

What makes me stark. raving. nuts. about this article is the fact that -- failures, disappointments, and the blatant cynicism of this administration aside -- these people are *still* going to vote for the Republicans. The people in this article are going to get out of their chairs, go to the polls, and vote for "The Values Party." Gah!

Aside from the fact that Congress and the White House have played politics with the values issues, but done little else, there's the whole thing where our President and Vice President and their minions have started an unnecessary war, failed to follow-through on the "justified" one, killed many of our soldiers, killed thousands of innocent civilians, have authorized torture, and generally spat on the Constitution - which, if I've heard the Christian Right correctly (this being a "Christian nation"), should be considered sacrosanct.

I have a dear friend visiting me next week and I am going to have to completely avoid about 20 subjects because I have lost all ability to talk rationally with anyone who calls him- or herself a Christian and yet supports the actions of the current Republican Party.

:::goes outside for a primal scream session:::

Yikes.

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:56:00 +0000

Well, this makes it some kind of weird coincidence that I watched The Day After on SciFi this afternoon.

I saw the film when it first aired and haven't since. It suffers a bit from being dated, but what's striking is how it first appears to be a typical movie-of-the-week, and then crushes every movie-of-the-week cliche. The ending is as bleak as they come. All these years after the end of the Cold War, I still found it chilling.

How Do You Define Terrorist?

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 05:53:00 +0000

If you're an innocent person -- in fact, a respected person who has done enormous good for your country -- and one day, people come barreling into your home, handcuff your wife, and take you in for questioning...and after that you are barred from continuing to help your country and are treated like a suspect with no end in sight...who would you say is acting like terrorists?

Uh oh.

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Sat, 07 Oct 2006 18:38:00 +0000

I hate articles like this; they're like the play-by-play guy announcing, "Not much chance of Jones missing this free throw!" Gah.

On the bright side, I loved Pelosi's "First 100 Hours" list. More like that, please.

Time to Go Dumpster Diving

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Sat, 07 Oct 2006 00:58:00 +0000

Lookee what the White House threw out in the Friday news dump. Something smelly is getting smellier. Surely some news organization is picking through the trash and might have something for us before Nov. 7?

What's the Code Word for This Situation?

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:34:00 +0000

A week or so ago, GeorgeW started using this "comma" metaphor in his responses about Iraq, and a couple of saavy folks figured out that it was code to his right-wing religious supporters.

So what code does he use for the Foley/Hastert situation?

Bushco Vs. Science: Part 134

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:58:00 +0000

NPR had a story on this afternoon's ATC that is yet another example of a Bush administration official ignoring the scientists he asked for advice, and setting lower standards for soot emissions (while, I'm sure, making large corporations happy).

There's nothing to do, apparently, but wait for these despicable people to be booted out (and to work hard so that happens).

Random and Scheduled are Two Different Things, Right?

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:26:00 +0000

The horror of the Amish school shootings is too much to process, so I'm nitpicking the AP story. (I've already heard from people who had TVs on today that the coverage was predictably awful, with helicopters and newsvans invading the Amish community. If only they could give the same attention to, say, bills that gut our Constitution. But I digress.)

Anyway, I was reading the AP story and came across this section:

Miller said that Roberts had been scheduled to take a random drug test on Monday. But the officer said it was not clear what role that may have played in the attack.

Scheduled to take a random drug test? How does that work?

Atrios Walking Out on A Limb

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:13:00 +0000

Atrios is doing nuance re: the Foley incidents. Hasn't anyone told him that nuance doesn't belong in politics? Heaven forbid we all analyze the situation. If he wasn't, you know, Atrios, he might have to worry about getting slammed for that kind of talk.

Do I Care What Brings Them Down?

noreply@blogger.com (Louise) — Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:04:00 +0000

Well, it's a whole 3 or so days since our Congress voted to gut our Constitution, and as far as I can tell, everyone's moved on. Now, it's All About Foley. Kevin Drum has a good point: this is an easy-to-understand issue on which Republicans may very well be defeated, so why worry? Do I care what brings them down?

Well, yes. Because a populace that doesn't throw these bastards out for what they've already done, including the "complicated" stuff like Abramoff and habeas corpus, will let the next group of bastards get away with whatever they dream up.

I'm not going to complain if Foley turns out to be the border collie that herds the American voting sheep into the Democratic party column, but I'll pessimistic about any lasting improvements.