<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;DkYMQ3ozeSp7ImA9WhRbGEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842</id><updated>2012-02-09T22:23:02.481-05:00</updated><category term="Windows 8" /><category term="MeeGo" /><category term="CNET" /><category term="Amazon" /><category term="tablet" /><category term="TrendNet" /><category term="digital camera" /><category term="bargain" /><category term="Windows" /><category term="zoom" /><category term="ultrabook" /><category term="Asus" /><category term="Canon" /><category term="crapware" /><category term="Kodak" /><category term="sales" /><category term="spyware" /><category term="capacitor" /><category term="ViewPad" /><category term="Android" /><category term="boot time" /><category term="touch" /><category term="HDTV" /><category term="HP" /><category term="screen size" /><category term="thin" /><category term="SD" /><category term="Linksys" /><category term="delivery" /><category term="Acer" /><category term="networking" /><category term="television" /><category term="download.com" /><category term="TouchPad" /><category term="cameras" /><category term="kindle" /><category term="optical" /><category term="Panasonic" /><category term="flash card" /><category term="text" /><category term="wireless" /><category term="secure digital" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="Samsung" /><category term="fail" /><category term="ereader" /><category term="Powerline" /><category term="Atom N435" /><category term="WiFi" /><title>Popular Technology</title><subtitle type="html">Bringing you the best from the world of technology.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>543</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/qeYlb" /><feedburner:info uri="blogspot/qeylb" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>blogspot/qeYlb</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkYMQ3ozfSp7ImA9WhRbGEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-5660609958630508281</id><published>2012-02-09T22:22:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-09T22:23:02.485-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-09T22:23:02.485-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="digital camera" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Kodak" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cameras" /><title>Kodak Exits Stage Left</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/5660609958630508281/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=5660609958630508281&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/5660609958630508281?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/5660609958630508281?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/7kZwSNFPypM/kodak-exits-stage-left.html" title="Kodak Exits Stage Left" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-DCaZc8FGAqg/TzSNQ3ZyrcI/AAAAAAAACCw/y6U_S5uRK0k/s72-c/kodak-logo-high.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">

Kodak has announced that they will be getting out of the camera business.  This once American icon, recently filed for bankruptcy, and is giving up on one of their core businesses.

I can't say I am disappointed.

Kodak never really made a successful transition from film to digital.  Their competitor in the film market, Fuji I thought did this much better.

Before we lament them, let us look at
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9jZkeEjI1vekTUwFUymKqTpanKQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9jZkeEjI1vekTUwFUymKqTpanKQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9jZkeEjI1vekTUwFUymKqTpanKQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9jZkeEjI1vekTUwFUymKqTpanKQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/7kZwSNFPypM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2012/02/kodak-exits-stage-left.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEYMRn4yeSp7ImA9WhRUGEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-8161387386203117707</id><published>2012-01-29T23:03:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-29T23:03:07.091-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-29T23:03:07.091-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Linksys" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Powerline" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="networking" /><title>Linksys PLSK400: Powerline AV 4-Port Network Adapter Kit</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/8161387386203117707/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=8161387386203117707&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/8161387386203117707?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/8161387386203117707?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/F0vDe_NC-_A/linksys-plsk400-powerline-av-4-port.html" title="Linksys PLSK400: Powerline AV 4-Port Network Adapter Kit" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0F3JFhI5A1Q/TyYPJn8ITeI/AAAAAAAACCI/NxOs0kO1ZHs/s72-c/P1000076.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">

There are basically 3 ways to connect a
computer to your internet modem:

 1- Wired with CAT 5e cable

 2- Wirelessly via a WiFi router

 3- Wired via a Powerline adaptor




As you build out your home network
there are multiple considerations, including the ease of which
dedicated Ethernet cabling can be run, the wireless coverage, the
location of the modem, and the bandwidth requirements.  A 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LsFqB0JTo_70hKV_1eY-V_9v_eI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LsFqB0JTo_70hKV_1eY-V_9v_eI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LsFqB0JTo_70hKV_1eY-V_9v_eI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LsFqB0JTo_70hKV_1eY-V_9v_eI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/F0vDe_NC-_A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2012/01/linksys-plsk400-powerline-av-4-port.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEMARX49eyp7ImA9WhRVEEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-4786834631334414956</id><published>2012-01-08T23:14:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-08T23:14:04.063-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-08T23:14:04.063-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="optical" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="digital camera" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="zoom" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Panasonic" /><title>Panasonic DMC-ZS9</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/4786834631334414956/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=4786834631334414956&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/4786834631334414956?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/4786834631334414956?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/X-uNXfljf0o/panasonic-dmc-zs9.html" title="Panasonic DMC-ZS9" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-28zEw3bUoeM/Twpo2v3MYeI/AAAAAAAACBw/v3rhchjUemY/s72-c/P1000034.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html"> After my frustration with Canon, I moved on to a new Panasonic, at least partly because it wasn't a Canon, it had manual controls even though it is a point and shoot, and the lens is made by Leica.  Well, going from an 8 MP 4x zoom, to a 14 MP 16x zoom was a big move up.  While not technically a superzoom, and still able to fit into a large pocket, the lens is equivalent to a 24 mm to 384 mm in 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V0SkYK2PyY5OZXCTJbA64YFykNA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V0SkYK2PyY5OZXCTJbA64YFykNA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V0SkYK2PyY5OZXCTJbA64YFykNA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V0SkYK2PyY5OZXCTJbA64YFykNA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/X-uNXfljf0o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2012/01/panasonic-dmc-zs9.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0AFR30zeip7ImA9WhRVEEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-5625457790651754462</id><published>2012-01-08T23:01:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-08T23:01:56.382-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-08T23:01:56.382-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="TrendNet" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="wireless" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="WiFi" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="networking" /><title>Next Gen WiFi</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/5625457790651754462/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=5625457790651754462&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/5625457790651754462?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/5625457790651754462?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/3u31L019X6Q/next-gen-wifi.html" title="Next Gen WiFi" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-3rsGmZGYtIA/Twpmeu3gBPI/AAAAAAAACBo/JI0Y9QvPbRg/s72-c/50b.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">

WiFi has been stuck for a while, as the standard went from "b" to "g" (with a detour to "a"), then seemingly endless "pre-n," and most recently "n."  Because it took so long to go from "pre-n" to "n," I think it made the true "n" somewhat anticlimactic.  The current "n" gear is certainly solid and stable (I use a Linksys E4200 these days), but it hardly feels next generation a year after it 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/deytS3PY3waqesiBa_kQfhzAcCc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/deytS3PY3waqesiBa_kQfhzAcCc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/deytS3PY3waqesiBa_kQfhzAcCc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/deytS3PY3waqesiBa_kQfhzAcCc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/3u31L019X6Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2012/01/next-gen-wifi.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0cBQn0_eSp7ImA9WhRXFU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-923459275464857539</id><published>2011-12-21T22:37:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2011-12-21T22:37:33.341-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-21T22:37:33.341-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Canon" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="digital camera" /><title>Canon PowerShot A590IS</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/923459275464857539/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=923459275464857539&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/923459275464857539?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/923459275464857539?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/XfarZCEzNOo/canon-powershot-a590is.html" title="Canon PowerShot A590IS" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GNvXA7WTyEo/TvKl0h9n25I/AAAAAAAACBg/r8PcLKsfPx0/s72-c/Canon-PowerShot-A590-IS.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">

I have had the Canon PowerShot A590IS since January 2008.  It is an 8 MP point and shoot, and the two things that attracted me to it were the manual controls, and that the power source is 2 AA batteries.  I have used NiMH's in it, but for the last year, the thing simply eats batteries.

After a full charge, the thing goes dead in a few hours- at best.  There are fixes out that that may have 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/y2k1E5k3dCir6QWpR1ZgabT3lBo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/y2k1E5k3dCir6QWpR1ZgabT3lBo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/y2k1E5k3dCir6QWpR1ZgabT3lBo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/y2k1E5k3dCir6QWpR1ZgabT3lBo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/XfarZCEzNOo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/12/canon-powershot-a590is.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEEFQ3g5fCp7ImA9WhdbFEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-2057918734982413510</id><published>2011-10-12T21:23:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2011-10-12T21:23:32.624-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-10-12T21:23:32.624-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="text" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fail" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="delivery" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Amazon" /><title>Amazon Text Fail</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/2057918734982413510/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=2057918734982413510&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/2057918734982413510?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/2057918734982413510?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/M6UKAxBKYBM/amazon-text-fail.html" title="Amazon Text Fail" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">So, I order a new TV on Amazon.  There is an option to have them text me updates as the set makes it way to my house.  This would be great, as I would like to know when it is coming so I can be home and ready to sign for it.

Yesterday, I go to the Amazon site and figure out that the set has shipped from the Amazon warehouse in Indianapolis.  Wow, the set is coming sooner than I thought.  However
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pHicMSWmaN9_DLAwN6Vpi5w8LOE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pHicMSWmaN9_DLAwN6Vpi5w8LOE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pHicMSWmaN9_DLAwN6Vpi5w8LOE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pHicMSWmaN9_DLAwN6Vpi5w8LOE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/M6UKAxBKYBM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/10/amazon-text-fail.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkYARX84cSp7ImA9WhdUEks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-4587745146102508105</id><published>2011-09-28T21:42:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-28T21:42:24.139-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-09-28T21:42:24.139-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ereader" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="touch" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="kindle" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Amazon" /><title>Amazon Kindle Thoughts</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/4587745146102508105/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=4587745146102508105&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/4587745146102508105?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/4587745146102508105?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/7bSNrLTKmF8/amazon-kindle-thoughts.html" title="Amazon Kindle Thoughts" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bd7nh99fyBE/ToPZr28GAvI/AAAAAAAACAg/hyqfDOriyN0/s72-c/KT-slate-02-lg._V166940136_.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">

Today was the big day that Amazon announced the latest crop of their Kindle line.  A recurring theme of Bezos is that Amazon is building premium products at non-premium prices.

This is a fine strategy, and unlike some others, I believe that they are following the economy where folks want cheap and value above all else.  They have been slowly cutting the prices of their readers for years, and 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v3RgkLN-CEJqwPBBX16-eFSlGvE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v3RgkLN-CEJqwPBBX16-eFSlGvE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v3RgkLN-CEJqwPBBX16-eFSlGvE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v3RgkLN-CEJqwPBBX16-eFSlGvE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/7bSNrLTKmF8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/09/amazon-kindle-thoughts.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUEFRXk6fSp7ImA9WhdUEUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-8215098689059069576</id><published>2011-09-27T21:39:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-27T21:40:14.715-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-09-27T21:40:14.715-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="flash card" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Amazon" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SD" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="secure digital" /><title>Amazon Basics Flash Cards</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/8215098689059069576/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=8215098689059069576&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/8215098689059069576?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/8215098689059069576?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/G2mpljXM_us/amazon-basics-flash-cards.html" title="Amazon Basics Flash Cards" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DY42H2r1eXM/ToKIJsfmORI/AAAAAAAACAc/c9uvwfkUtTA/s72-c/41JdEy1tc1L._AA300_.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">

While I have a drawer full of flash cards, it seems like I can always use one more.  Especially as memory becomes less expensive, they do seem like a bargain.

I spotted today that Amazon has a line of their own branded flash cards, and like most things Amazon they are quite cheap.  They are SD cards, available in the 4 GB, 8 GB, 16 GB and 32 GB sizes.  Their are Class 4, which are standard 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AeRmIc0T1eAUZmSpju2H0JKNu-4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AeRmIc0T1eAUZmSpju2H0JKNu-4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AeRmIc0T1eAUZmSpju2H0JKNu-4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AeRmIc0T1eAUZmSpju2H0JKNu-4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/G2mpljXM_us" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/09/amazon-basics-flash-cards.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkIGQ3c5eip7ImA9WhdVEEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-5951886137066421540</id><published>2011-09-14T21:41:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-14T21:42:02.922-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-09-14T21:42:02.922-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ultrabook" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="screen size" /><title>Ultrabook: Size Does Matter</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/5951886137066421540/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=5951886137066421540&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/5951886137066421540?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/5951886137066421540?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/64Ub-QyevKQ/ultrabook-size-does-matter.html" title="Ultrabook: Size Does Matter" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-PnxZxRqqQ00/TnFlw-0YMkI/AAAAAAAACAU/l_jwzZIpwG4/s72-c/ultrabook-5.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">

For quite a while, I simply don't get why the standard screen size for a notebook is 15.6", as I find that it is simply too large, and it becomes more of a desktop that folds, rather than a mobile computing device.  For the record, I currently use an 11.6", a 12.1", a 14" and a 15.6" notebook.

Care to guess which one gets the most use?  For a while, the 14 incher has by far gotten the most use
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DopZu97mLgHOPW1OHOUOfZ0yiXw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DopZu97mLgHOPW1OHOUOfZ0yiXw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DopZu97mLgHOPW1OHOUOfZ0yiXw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DopZu97mLgHOPW1OHOUOfZ0yiXw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/64Ub-QyevKQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/09/ultrabook-size-does-matter.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0MHRXc8eSp7ImA9WhdWGUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-1174644303812267644</id><published>2011-09-13T22:36:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-13T22:37:14.971-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-09-13T22:37:14.971-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Windows" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tablet" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Windows 8" /><title>Windows 8 Developer Preview</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/1174644303812267644/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=1174644303812267644&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/1174644303812267644?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/1174644303812267644?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/gIHbJq2Yqco/windows-8-developer-preview.html" title="Windows 8 Developer Preview" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">There have some miscellaneous glimpses at the next version of Windows, so far dubbed Windows 8.  It is currently in Developer Preview, and can be downloaded, although this is not for the faint as it will not be stable at this point.

There are several new features to it, but overall it looks to me like it was designed from the groundup for tablet computing.  It nicely integrates into the cloud as
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ND3KPMyX6dnBvUdVQpr_EsFPIzo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ND3KPMyX6dnBvUdVQpr_EsFPIzo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ND3KPMyX6dnBvUdVQpr_EsFPIzo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ND3KPMyX6dnBvUdVQpr_EsFPIzo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/gIHbJq2Yqco" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/09/windows-8-developer-preview.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0IHQ3kzeip7ImA9WhdWGEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-7592355606629654662</id><published>2011-09-12T21:05:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-12T21:05:32.782-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-09-12T21:05:32.782-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="MeeGo" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Linux" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Asus" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Atom N435" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="thin" /><title>Asus Eee PC X101 MeeGo Netbook</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/7592355606629654662/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=7592355606629654662&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/7592355606629654662?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/7592355606629654662?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/4MNBF2aqIqw/asus-eee-pc-x101-meego-netbook.html" title="Asus Eee PC X101 MeeGo Netbook" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-njaRoa11tDo/Tm66Pox9J2I/AAAAAAAACAQ/J2yy0ya6M1s/s72-c/X101-EU37_thin_S._V152428814_.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Announced at CES last year, Asus' cheap inexpensive netbook is coming to market.  It is available at select retailers for the sub-$200 price point, although Amazon is currently at $226.

The high points are a "slim is in' thickness of a svelte 0.69".  Another high point is that the drive is a solid state one.

However, there are definitely compromises at this price, such as the single core Atom 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lwt-LM55k8BCuTZAu0WWxJn1hzo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lwt-LM55k8BCuTZAu0WWxJn1hzo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lwt-LM55k8BCuTZAu0WWxJn1hzo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lwt-LM55k8BCuTZAu0WWxJn1hzo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/4MNBF2aqIqw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pc-x101-meego-netbook.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEQARXY4fip7ImA9WhdWFk8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-4640424472610171215</id><published>2011-09-09T21:37:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-09T21:39:04.836-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-09-09T21:39:04.836-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="boot time" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Windows" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Windows 8" /><title>Windows 8 Boot Time</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/4640424472610171215/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=4640424472610171215&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/4640424472610171215?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/4640424472610171215?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/P0lw7XbZPsc/windows-8.html" title="Windows 8 Boot Time" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/wznucnoc-rY/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">



I always turn my computers off when I am done with them, so a faster boot time would be something I would appreciate.  I have been pleased how Windows 7 boots much faster than Vista, and would like to see that trend continue.

Wondering what that phrase at the end of the video means that she can't wait for us all to get this soon... 

MaximumPC

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pB4pHb5u_95VnQIT9Hc11YAjrc8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pB4pHb5u_95VnQIT9Hc11YAjrc8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pB4pHb5u_95VnQIT9Hc11YAjrc8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pB4pHb5u_95VnQIT9Hc11YAjrc8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/P0lw7XbZPsc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/09/windows-8.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C08HQXw5eSp7ImA9WhRVEEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-459240000498174714</id><published>2011-09-08T21:53:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-08T23:03:50.221-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-08T23:03:50.221-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Samsung" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="HDTV" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="television" /><title>Samsung Cannot Be Fixed</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/459240000498174714/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=459240000498174714&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/459240000498174714?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/459240000498174714?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/NE_gVtS177Y/samsung-cannot-be-fixed.html" title="Samsung Cannot Be Fixed" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">So, I brought my HDTV in for service, and on the 800 number from Samsung, they did tell me that this sounded quite like a capacitor issue.  I was also promised that it would be done at no cost to me.  Well, not so much...

I brought the set in, and I was then told that there was a $25 bench fee for diagnosis, and of course, this was not covered.  Well, I did want this fixed, so I went along with 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/w-O1SpYNLOomqIYdgrvUPOYSOhQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/w-O1SpYNLOomqIYdgrvUPOYSOhQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/w-O1SpYNLOomqIYdgrvUPOYSOhQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/w-O1SpYNLOomqIYdgrvUPOYSOhQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/NE_gVtS177Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/09/samsung-cannot-be-fixed.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0IBQnw-cSp7ImA9WhdWFU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-4891709736618076284</id><published>2011-09-08T21:32:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-08T21:32:33.259-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-09-08T21:32:33.259-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tablet" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Android" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ViewPad" /><title>ViewPad For Peorder On Amazon</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/4891709736618076284/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=4891709736618076284&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/4891709736618076284?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/4891709736618076284?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/KKI_B_JLYss/viewpad-for-peorder-on-amazon.html" title="ViewPad For Peorder On Amazon" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Well, it looks like 7" is the new 10" as I am expecting to see more 7" tablet devices in the coming months.  I have to say that it makes sense to me as when I used a 10" iPad, the thing always felt too close in size to a small notebook, yet without as much functionality.  I think the 7" size should be a better niche for the tablet space, with an extended battery life as well.

At any rate, the 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mHFI3yrARX42dzMtvWUDJHB9esk/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mHFI3yrARX42dzMtvWUDJHB9esk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mHFI3yrARX42dzMtvWUDJHB9esk/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mHFI3yrARX42dzMtvWUDJHB9esk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/KKI_B_JLYss" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/09/viewpad-for-peorder-on-amazon.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak4CQX49fCp7ImA9WhdXE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-1225957905112968365</id><published>2011-08-25T22:05:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2011-08-25T22:22:40.064-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-08-25T22:22:40.064-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Samsung" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="HDTV" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="capacitor" /><title>Samsung HDTV Issue</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/1225957905112968365/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=1225957905112968365&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/1225957905112968365?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/1225957905112968365?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/LD3sSJdUe8M/samsung-hdtv-issue.html" title="Samsung HDTV Issue" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-07fpiSpoKLA/TlcQgZgmIlI/AAAAAAAACAE/2D8gPVeM7Jo/s72-c/Badcaps-tayeh-4.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">I bought my first HDTV back in 2007, a 26" LCD from Samsung.  After researching it ad nauseum, I figured out that Samsung had the best picture.  I was pleased with the purchase, but have to admit that over $700 for the thing was kind of steep, but chalked it up to being on the cutting edge, and figured it was the price of hi def admission.  Besides, this was an investment in enjoying TV, and was 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/E6DIPKUrJAoKT9QK2moyCle5bPQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/E6DIPKUrJAoKT9QK2moyCle5bPQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/E6DIPKUrJAoKT9QK2moyCle5bPQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/E6DIPKUrJAoKT9QK2moyCle5bPQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/LD3sSJdUe8M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/08/samsung-hdtv-issue.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEIARHg8cSp7ImA9WhRVEEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-2399757790847336179</id><published>2011-08-24T22:25:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-08T23:15:45.679-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-08T23:15:45.679-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Acer" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sales" /><title>Acer Bets Wrong &amp; Loses Big</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/2399757790847336179/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=2399757790847336179&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/2399757790847336179?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/2399757790847336179?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/IYJyszK5Ii8/acer-bets-wrong-loses-big.html" title="Acer Bets Wrong &amp; Loses Big" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">I can fully admit that I am just slightly opinionated on technology.  I have gone through more computers than I can count easily, and often get asked what to purchase.


My list of what not to buy goes long.  It starts with Casio which sold me a watch, and it literally self destructed within a few months, and the company never answered my letter.  It moves on to HP which IMHO ruined Compaq when 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mKZl2nJAo41_yP_OpLZT9ZYL1xw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mKZl2nJAo41_yP_OpLZT9ZYL1xw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mKZl2nJAo41_yP_OpLZT9ZYL1xw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mKZl2nJAo41_yP_OpLZT9ZYL1xw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/IYJyszK5Ii8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/08/acer-bets-wrong-loses-big.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUIHRn49cSp7ImA9WhdXEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-5735700193160207900</id><published>2011-08-23T22:38:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-08-23T22:45:37.069-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-08-23T22:45:37.069-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="crapware" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="CNET" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spyware" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="download.com" /><title>Download Some Crapware</title><link rel="related" href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/08/22/1740238/Downloadcom-Now-Wraps-Downloads-In-Bloatware" title="Download Some Crapware" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/5735700193160207900/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=5735700193160207900&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/5735700193160207900?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/5735700193160207900?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/yVNzQuqzi38/download-some-crapware.html" title="Download Some Crapware" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">CNET's Download.com was consistently a safe source of software on the internet.  The downloads were always fast, and certified to be spyware free, and not to mention quite plentiful.  While I would sometimes hesitate to grab software from some site I was not familiar with, I never thought twice about downloading stuff from there.

Now CNET is apparently making a turn for the worse by wrapping the
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-uUuGLkIFOxAM-CNdH3gIKFjlnY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-uUuGLkIFOxAM-CNdH3gIKFjlnY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-uUuGLkIFOxAM-CNdH3gIKFjlnY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-uUuGLkIFOxAM-CNdH3gIKFjlnY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/yVNzQuqzi38" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/08/download-some-crapware.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkECQX08eSp7ImA9WhdXEEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-3670519114528871487</id><published>2011-08-22T22:29:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-08-22T22:37:40.371-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-08-22T22:37:40.371-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="TouchPad" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bargain" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tablet" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="HP" /><title>HP TouchPad</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/3670519114528871487/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=3670519114528871487&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/3670519114528871487?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/3670519114528871487?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/mzqMF62nBqk/hp-touchpad.html" title="HP TouchPad" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6IeZVSPbNvE/TlMgdOzSmwI/AAAAAAAAB_8/WKzQzyAqk1M/s72-c/HP-TouchPad_2.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">The HP TouchPad seems to have gained a second life over the weekend.  While it was significantly dismissed and neglected at the $399 price point, it is simply amazing how it has flown off of shelves at the fire sale price of $99.

Did I rush out to buy one?  Well, I was of the opinion that it was not all that great, and I simply did not want one at any price.  Sure if you make something cheap 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9Ccq4ycO1kRwvgQQCFWqslaAXIA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9Ccq4ycO1kRwvgQQCFWqslaAXIA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9Ccq4ycO1kRwvgQQCFWqslaAXIA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9Ccq4ycO1kRwvgQQCFWqslaAXIA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/mzqMF62nBqk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2011/08/hp-touchpad.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEcCR3s-fip7ImA9WBNWFE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-115543606651663505</id><published>2006-08-12T21:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-08-12T21:27:46.556-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2006-08-12T21:27:46.556-05:00</app:edited><title>Buying a GPS</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/115543606651663505/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=115543606651663505&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/115543606651663505?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/115543606651663505?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/kLfe7ST8PNQ/buying-gps.html" title="Buying a GPS" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">As we're all going to be taking some more car trips with the current airline situation, I'm going to   be recommending the Garmin c320.  It has a great feature set, and should suit most users.  Plan on upgrading the included SD flash card, and the maps.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jaR02b_ffy-sipxp8UmopLGCuaQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jaR02b_ffy-sipxp8UmopLGCuaQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jaR02b_ffy-sipxp8UmopLGCuaQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jaR02b_ffy-sipxp8UmopLGCuaQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/kLfe7ST8PNQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2006/08/buying-gps.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk8HQH4-fip7ImA9WBVaF0o.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-113977483101576460</id><published>2006-02-12T15:04:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-12T15:07:11.056-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2006-02-12T15:07:11.056-05:00</app:edited><title>I'm going with the Palm</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/113977483101576460/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=113977483101576460&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113977483101576460?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113977483101576460?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/PG4v1v56Gdw/im-going-with-palm.html" title="I'm going with the Palm" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Would you believe that Amazon ran out of the iPaq?  I'll buy the T/X.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_lZkPyzY4msgEv_jikpc8q0Yc0M/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_lZkPyzY4msgEv_jikpc8q0Yc0M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_lZkPyzY4msgEv_jikpc8q0Yc0M/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_lZkPyzY4msgEv_jikpc8q0Yc0M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/PG4v1v56Gdw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2006/02/im-going-with-palm.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEUHQ3c7fip7ImA9WBVUF0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-113777661835573835</id><published>2006-01-20T11:58:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-01-20T13:37:12.906-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2006-01-20T13:37:12.906-05:00</app:edited><title>iPaq 1955</title><link rel="related" href="http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopping/product_detail.do?storeName=storefronts&amp;landing=storefronts&amp;category=handhelds&amp;subcat1=classic_performance&amp;catLevel=2&amp;product_code=FA629A%23ABA" title="iPaq 1955" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/113777661835573835/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=113777661835573835&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113777661835573835?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113777661835573835?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/kXDcMfaerAg/ipaq-1955.html" title="iPaq 1955" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">If you've been looking for a solid but inexpensive Windows-based PDA for mobile Web browsing, you might want to check out the latest offering from Hewlett-Packard. The company's newest iPAQ is the rx1955, a slim and lightweight mid-range handheld that sports Windows Mobile 5.0, Microsoft's most up-to-date operating system (OS) for mobile devices.Physically speaking, the rx1955 appears almost 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wziq7GbLkwmo9ILfGElCvb-JR3o/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wziq7GbLkwmo9ILfGElCvb-JR3o/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wziq7GbLkwmo9ILfGElCvb-JR3o/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wziq7GbLkwmo9ILfGElCvb-JR3o/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/kXDcMfaerAg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2006/01/ipaq-1955.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUMCQn0zeCp7ImA9WBVUEUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-113718746331905359</id><published>2006-01-13T16:12:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-01-13T16:24:23.380-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2006-01-13T16:24:23.380-05:00</app:edited><title>Joining Forces</title><link rel="related" href="http://www.technudgelive.com/2006/01/introduction.html" title="Joining Forces" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/113718746331905359/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=113718746331905359&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113718746331905359?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113718746331905359?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/Rgo_emCONi0/joining-forces.html" title="Joining Forces" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Hi All!As you've probably noticed, I've been a little less active on this site over the last month or two. That has been because I have been working on setting up a more formal relationship with the website TechNudge, and am helping to found TechNudge Live.Over last year that Popular Technology has amassed around 10,000 page views, which is decent for my first effort at an online website. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IHYz-NJGnpIL7yBdPPXkabcMOIk/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IHYz-NJGnpIL7yBdPPXkabcMOIk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IHYz-NJGnpIL7yBdPPXkabcMOIk/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IHYz-NJGnpIL7yBdPPXkabcMOIk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/Rgo_emCONi0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2006/01/joining-forces.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU8FQns7fip7ImA9WBVUEU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-113712381347994127</id><published>2006-01-12T22:38:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-01-12T22:43:33.506-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2006-01-12T22:43:33.506-05:00</app:edited><title>Robot In A Box</title><link rel="related" href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28940" title="Robot In A Box" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/113712381347994127/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=113712381347994127&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113712381347994127?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113712381347994127?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/HK6zap4hbJo/robot-in-box.html" title="Robot In A Box" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html"> Robotis takes a serious robotics kit, with actuators, grippers, sensors and wheels, and packages it up in a toy like format. The kit itself looks like a big Lego box, but at an MSRP of around $900 for the large one, $350 for the small, is in a completely different league.The Bioloid kit is a hardcore but accessible robotics workshop, make no mistake there. It comes with a C-like programming 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wD26TvUr0iWLfkuwSvpjbnLExuw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wD26TvUr0iWLfkuwSvpjbnLExuw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wD26TvUr0iWLfkuwSvpjbnLExuw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wD26TvUr0iWLfkuwSvpjbnLExuw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/HK6zap4hbJo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2006/01/robot-in-box.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEMMRns4eyp7ImA9WBVVGEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-113686219118797947</id><published>2006-01-09T22:02:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-01-09T22:08:07.533-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2006-01-09T22:08:07.533-05:00</app:edited><title>Open Source CPU ???</title><link rel="related" href="http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2006Jan/bch20060106034066.htm" title="Open Source CPU ???" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/113686219118797947/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=113686219118797947&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113686219118797947?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113686219118797947?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/JE5Au8oSHnA/open-source-cpu.html" title="Open Source CPU ???" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Wanted: Hardware designers for the GeekPUHave you any insight on CPU design? Think you've got a good idea that doesn't exist today? Want to see it in operation? Let's put our heads together and see what we can come up with for a new CPU design, to be called "GeekPU."The funny thing is that these guys are serious! I give them an A for effort, and an A+ for enthusiasm. They want to undertake a year
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JUkheA1faKOsMna4ornkDy69H_o/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JUkheA1faKOsMna4ornkDy69H_o/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JUkheA1faKOsMna4ornkDy69H_o/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JUkheA1faKOsMna4ornkDy69H_o/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/JE5Au8oSHnA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2006/01/open-source-cpu.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEUBSHk5eCp7ImA9WBVVFUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11335842.post-113658141571147741</id><published>2006-01-06T15:52:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-01-06T16:17:39.720-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2006-01-06T16:17:39.720-05:00</app:edited><title>Smaller SD Cards With LARGE Capacities</title><link rel="related" href="http://www.sandisk.com/Corporate/PressRoom/PressReleases/PressRelease.aspx?ID=3229" title="Smaller SD Cards With LARGE Capacities" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/feeds/113658141571147741/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11335842&amp;postID=113658141571147741&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113658141571147741?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11335842/posts/default/113658141571147741?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~3/vg9NvJEYJcs/smaller-sd-cards-with-large-capacities.html" title="Smaller SD Cards With LARGE Capacities" /><author><name>digitaldoc</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13568754021777120336</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Personally, I think that Secure Digital flash cards are plenty small. They are no bigger than a postage stamp, and their biggest shortcoming, in my mind, is that you have to be careful not to lose them! However, in the world of electronics, smaller is always better, and SanDisk is moving in that direction.At the Las Vegas CES, they are introducing the miniSD card, available in a 2 GB capacity. If
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d2fASKTNItZii7k0PFIEuA7v800/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d2fASKTNItZii7k0PFIEuA7v800/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d2fASKTNItZii7k0PFIEuA7v800/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d2fASKTNItZii7k0PFIEuA7v800/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/qeYlb/~4/vg9NvJEYJcs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://populartechnology.blogspot.com/2006/01/smaller-sd-cards-with-large-capacities.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

