सिक्खा पदम् समादियामी..

Human Relations in India

2014-09-18T04:46:00.001+05:30

A friend of mine is in a relationship with a boy. I don't know the guy, or how is he as a person, except that he is well settled having a good job. My friend is also an educated and self-reliant person having a good job.

My friend's family somehow came to know this and was in a way informed by the girl only. They also know only this much about the boy. Both of them are adult, independent and mature people. But the day the family came to know about it, things changed drastically, the melodrama of intense opposition, emotional blackmails, suicidal warnings and outright rejection from my friend's family. Things went so worse that she even got thrashed by her mother for having made her own choice.

The only reason for all this according to them is the one bit of information that I haven't shared yet, that is, the girl belongs to a non-brahmin upper caste while the boy is a dalit, not just that, it would have been fine if the boy was christain or some other slightly lower caste, but the boy is buddhist!! For heaven's sake even a muslim would have been fine. But no Buddhist dalit. They are way too low a caste. That is the logic these people have.

On knowing this, for advise on the issue, another common friend called an elderly educated socially inclined respectable brahmin person who shared good relations, and the first thing he said was again 'a christain or muslim would have been fine, but not this, they are a lower caste, she should have taken care in the first place'.

Now I don't know the boy personally to have any opinion about the relationship or advise about ways to get married without consent of girl's family. But the background of the boy or the state of their relationship is not even in the picture. Even the economic conditions are not very different, and are mostly in favor of the boy. Its only the caste. Its only the so called society that wont approve of it.

I know a lot of people get troubled and irritated about my aggressive opinions and posts on the matter of casteism, they even accuse me of having prejudices, but what should I feel about such dirt in this society, why not feel insulted and infuriated. What should I think of the family of my friend or that brahmin uncle when I meet him that he has a deep rooted hatred and disgust about what I was born as? That given a chance any person in this country will have a bias against me to affect me adversely for undue reasons? Its not about that boy, its about the caste to which a lot of us are subjected to. I think I have full right to express my discontent with these kind of people and their societies and their so called cultures. And if they feel offended, let them, if they don't feel ashamed, they are shameless and I don't care about their shamelessness. All those who are against these kind of mentalities should not care about their mentalities getting offended.

Arundhati Roy's claim to co-authoring Ambedkar's 'AoC' got partly removed

2014-09-16T02:27:00.000+05:30

For past few days, ever since Arundhati Roy published her 'introduction' to 'Annihilation of Caste', a speech authored and published by Dr. Ambedkar, Ms. Roy has been a center of criticism from all around dalit academia for misrepresenting Ambedkar's thoughts, contexts and attempts to unnecessarily pulling MK Gandhi into the debate. There also has been a mass marketing campaigning to overshadow the original work by the mere critic or should we say an over-stretched 'preface' for selling something already in public domain for a very high cost to the people who do not even bother about the subject matter. But the major furor arise when Navayan along with Amazon, Verso and few more online publications mentioned Arundhati Roy either as a sole 'Author' or as a co-author of 'Annihilation of Caste'. This is not just copyright infringement, this is complete robbery, that would have not been unintentional or overlooked by the publishers or at least the 'author' Arundhati Roy. Though I like some of her works, this does not mean her attempts at appropriating Ambedkar could be spared or overlooked. Being concerned about it, not having the direct means of urgently communicating Ms. Roy, I instead contacted the London based Verso publication. You can see how it was crediting Roy at a same level as Ambedkar, thereby suggesting the co-authorship of the entire work.

Following is the complete email communication that took place with Verso, I am publishing with an intent to record the mistake of the publication, keep it in public domain, so that this does not go unseen and may help minimizing other such attempts.

_____________________________________________________
"""

On 14/09/2014 10:10, "Rahul Bhalerao" <b.rahul.pm@..> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Rahul Bhalerao <b.rahul.pm@..>

Date: Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 2:38 PM

Subject: Critical mistake in crediting the author in your publication

To: verso@versobooks.com

Cc: Joint Secretary Ministry of IB <sanurag@ias.nic.in>, "GnowTatnra

Pvt. Ltd." <rahul@..>

Dear Sir,

It has come to our notice that on Verso Publication's website, you

have published one of the greatest works of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar,

"Annihilation of Caste" with introduction and critic by Arundhati Roy.

Here is a link on your website:

http://www.versobooks.com/books/1800-annihilation-of-caste

On the page, the book is said to be authored by both Dr. Ambedkar and

Arundhati Roy. Whereas, the fact of the historical matter is that,

"Annihilation of Caste" is originally authored by only Dr. Ambedkar

published on May 15, 1936, when Ms. Roy was not even born. By

declaring both of their names in the author list at the same level, it

appears the Verso Publication is giving a very wrong impression that

the work is co-authored by both of them. It indeed is an insult to the

great Founder of Modern India, whose scholarly work is incomparable

with the severely criticized 'Introduction' by Ms. Roy.

I am sure this must have been a mistake from your side to mix up the

two works. You should either credit only Dr. Ambedkar for the original

work with 'preface' kind of work by Ms. Roy, or you should credit only

Ms. Roy for the 'Introduction' without actually claiming to publish

'Annihilation of Caste'. If not any of this, the 'Authors' section

should clearly distinguish the two works and their authors. Ms.

Arundhati Roy can never and should never be projected as a co-author

of the original great work.

There is already a furor among Indian Academia about this grave insult

imposed by the Verso Publication, though the actual people who may get

offended may not be very active on online forums. Please correct this

before furor spreads widely and the people being offended take steps

to bring a complete ban on the publication in India.

Regards,

Rahul Bhalerao,

Director, GnowTantra.

PGP13, IIM Kozhikode.

__________________________

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Leo Hollis <leo@verso.co.uk> wrote:
> Dear Rahul Bhalerao
>
> Thank you very much for your very helpful email. I am the editor at the
> Verso London office. I would like to clarify a mechanical error that you
> have highlighted, and we have already sought remedy for these mistakes.
> These errors have resulted from a computer feed from our system to the US
> amazon information system. As you will note there are inconsistencies which
> we will aim to rectify in the next day or so.
>
> To clarify, we are publishing the Navayana edition of 'Annihilation of
> Caste' by Ambedkar with an introduction from Roy. We have also acknowledged
> Anand as editor. This is how the project was presented to us by Navayana
> and how we plan to proceed. As you will note all these are correctly
> annotated on the front cover of the book itself.
>
> So to reassure you: this is our website page:
> http://www.versobooks.com/books/1800-annihilation-of-caste
>
> On Amazon.co.uk, we actually need to add in the Roy Introduction :
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1781688311/ref=s9_simh_gw_p14_d0_i1?pf_rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=0221DBQ7CZK0PTETCZ41&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=455344027&pf_rd_i=468294
>
> If there are any further queries, please do let me know
>
> Leo
_____________________

Dear Leo Hollis,

Thank you very much for the apt correction. I can assure you that this
correction is being well-received among the concerned academic and
social communities. I would request you to please cascade the changes
on the other related print and digital publications as far as possible
in your capacities.

Regards,
Rahul.

"""
___________________________________________________________

Now the publication is showing the proper credits:

I am going to send similar mails to other publishers as well, whichever are reachable. I also request other to keep doing so, in case some of them don't listen to individual voice. In order to counter the brahminized scholars from appropriating the sacred text of anti-manu revolution, we need to be alert and actively critical.

15th Aug, Independence Day, a Beggar and a Tea

2014-09-10T01:56:00.000+05:30

(Reblogging from here)

On this 15th August, afternoon, I was sipping on a tea at a roadside stall, sitting on a bench, waiting for a colleague, when I heard an aged female voice over my head, 'चहा पाजतु का दादा' ('would you help with some tea'). Before I could realize that there was a fairly old couple, woman having a limped leg, and old man, mostly her husband in 70s, were asking the two cab drivers for some tea, the cab drivers responded, 'पाजतु ना' (sure why not). I generally have a strict rule of not heeding to the pleas of beggars (and I have my moral position on that considering the beggar mafia openly ruling the streets in Mumbai), but once in a while some one catches your attention and you just can't help stopping yourself from doing something if not just giving away 2 rupees. This time the instant assurance of the cab driver to buy them two cups of tea caught my eye and especially ear. The old couple did not look exactly like beggars, their clothes were fine for someone from rural area, just helpless people out of home, out of money and without any support at all. The driver asked her about her situation, whether she has a family etc. to which the woman told him about her only son, a drunkard, who is selling off every vessel and nut of the house for his liquor, his beaten up wife has left the house and prefers staying at her parents, even the land and farm in the village are on the way to get sold, the son has lost so much of himself that he even runs after his father with a knife in hand for money for his drink. So finally, they have been thrown out to roam on streets and beg for 2 rupees as the old man could not get any physical work, while woman was already on one leg and a stick in hand. Quite a heart-touching story it was, and for most of it, it looked real.

I was silently appreciating the cab drivers kindness of lending the tea for two, just then he said something to the woman, something so drastic, unimaginable, sudden and sharp, that it took that moment to a completely different level for me. "Now listen to me, do one thing, both of you, there's a railway-station nearby, just go there. Walk a few yards beyond the platform and then just sleep on the tracks. And ohh yes! bring your son too and make him go under the train before you go." Cruel. Disgusting insults on two lives of more than 70 years by someone in his 30s, in exchange of two 'cutting chai' Rs 6 each. Realization of why one poor showed some pity on another poor, for being able to insult in such a way and enjoy the authority to do so for just 12 bucks was worse than my own cruel rule of ignoring beggars and a little guilt that follows at times. But that was not the end. The woman was adamant for continuation of her son's life, as well as her own. Death was not an option for her, life, no matter what it meant had to be lived. I didn't understand the need of her 2-3 sentences of adamant denial to the man who advised death, but appreciated the will to survive.

Once this was settled, the drivers gone, and couple calmly sipping the tea, I initiated a talk with the woman with no specific plan. As she went on about her helplessness, and as she said 'our nature is of giving not begging, but have to do it', it had both a reflection of a decent past, a little bit of pride, and huge hollowness of everything before survival. With an intent to help in a more meaningful manner, I asked her to stop roaming around like beggars at this age, asked if she knew anything about any charitable organizations nearby. On knowing that the couple knew nothing of the sorts, I gave them options where they could find some help. At least a roof, and some food on daily basis. This included some charitable orphanages, Temple trusts, rich spiritual shrines nearby, including a Balaji temple, Gurudwara, Sai Baba temple, a list of social and govt organizations who could help, and were within few minutes distance by train, the nearest of them being a Buddha vihar at a 5 mins of walking distance. She looked intrigued and willing to consider those suggestions over the option of begging on streets. But then something happened that took me on another mental journey altogether.

This woman, defeated by life, defeated by the conditions, betrayed by her own blood, having been asked to die in exchange of two cutting chai, having lost the meaning of her life if anything was there, came closer and in a slightly lowered voice, repeated the list of places I suggested, took names of all the gods, whose named trusts I suggested, went on adding gods from her own list, and said she will go to any of them, Balaji will do, even Sai Baba will do, "but I will NOT go to the Buddha temple!" Shocked and taken aback, I tried to recompose and asked "why not, its just there, beyond this street" but "No, not that. No Buddha temple!"

My friend had arrived, he called me out, and off we went. I kept looking back for a while, not sure if indeed physically turning my neck or just in my thoughts, but her words kept coming back.

Its not that I didn't get what she meant, she certainly did not know a thing about Buddha's teachings, so there was no way I could take it as an offence against Buddha, also since I wasn't selling her any religion or preaching there, merely advising on what places she could go, being an atheist actually listing most of the temples, her choice of any of them had no bearing on what I should have felt. But why would a woman, in her condition, rather than making a simple choice of where she should go, takes efforts to let me know where she would NOT go, no matter what. So all my educated and intellectual friends, please spare a moment to think over it why this would have happened. Why for a poor Hindu (ahh well there were enough signs on them to suggest that, so don't bring up the stereotypical allegation of stereotyping religion. Sometimes common sense prevails), a Sikh charity is all right, any imaginary god is fine, government is fine, even a Muslim sage is fine, but not a very own Indian real person of the stature of Buddha whose teachings have shaped major part of our accommodating non-violent culture, not so fine? Put your grey cells to work and make me understand the contradiction to the intellectual Indian's constant rhetoric that Buddha is very much Hindu and very much a part of the same system, just another 'panth'(branch), in the same family of spiritual and cultural traditions against the practicality of this unusual separatism.

No, its not just Buddha. Of course he does not fit as well as the intellectuals try to fit him into the Indian Hindu nationalist spiritual rhetoric. But there is something deeper than that. If you know even a little bit about rural Maharashtra, Buddha means only one thing, the new God of the 'untouchable' people, the 'untouchable God'. By all means the emotional journey over the sad life of a poor old couple, took me through several planes and suddenly dropped in the pile of castes. Making me realize that even beggars could have a false-pride, note that its not your good romantic self-esteem, its an outrageous, unnatural, hollow pride. And my dear friends, I know some of you who love me a little extra would be jumping to put the credit of bringing caste into this, but no, it was forced. Forced by the woman thrashed on the roads, by her own son, still having a hollow sense of pride and separatism based on a very 'important(?)' aspect of her life, the caste. Being unnecessarily looked down or rejected by the people with possessions is not at all new for someone from depressed class, but being looked down, for no reason from someone with no possessions, no powers, no resources and no knowledge, only on the basis of a false sense of caste-pride and that hollow dignity was all new experience that intellectual educated Indians will rarely understand. No my dear friends, its not that a beggar cannot look down upon someone, its not that a beggar cannot have a self-esteem, every researcher and every sage who lives on donation amounts and free alms is a beggar, so any beggar with apt possessions in various moral and ethical forms can and should have the dignity, self-esteem, self-respect, but when its based on something as stupid and as ugly as caste, its not a self-esteem, its a farce, ugly farce, that's going on for generations after generations. Its everywhere, and each one of the depressed class human, and not just human but even their God, is facing it every day. I could give number of examples of casteist attitudes and insults thrown towards people I know personally, experiences of my own, but don't want to dilute the intensity of this one experience, they are more of a regular offences, everybody likes to turn blind eye to them. But no matter how much you deny, caste is 'the' en-slaver of Indian mind, just remember how you got married or how in future you would and you would know what I mean. The society and the mind of Indians are still not free from this mental gutter which does transform itself into physical plagues on a regular basis. The freedom is a long awaited dream and far away target. Hope the real freedom will rise some day. May the old couple get to any one of the place and spend their remaining life in peace and in search of meaning, not just bread and pride.

[P.S. So my educated intellectual friends, no matter what your opinions are, on what basis they are formed, and no matter how much you declare yourself not guilty of being part and fuel in this entire scheme of caste based discrimination, atrocious culture and separatism, if you utter a word about caste being just a political tool, not a social evil as much, it being only irrelevant and non-existent or a non-significant problem, and claim that your religion(whichever it is) has no base for this menace, and its the dalits/untouchables that are responsible for its existence, just imagine the level of sanity that would be attributed to you. If there is any anger or bitterness in my words, its not against the poor lady, she is just another slave of the system, so the anger is against this system, against this culture. Also this is not just a random rambling, yes there would be proactive opponents who would ask what's the use of all these rants. But before going into the usefulness of words against actions and before some outrageous good-for-nothing person asks about the evidence of action(the usual 'what have YOU done'), let me remind that I am not obliged to answer that, this is a collection words and thoughts based on personal experience without any specific target, apart from a simple objective of expression and hope that even if some of the people realize how deep rooted the imprints of caste and its false pride and divisiveness are on the Indian mind, even if only a few realize how much disservice this attitude of forced separatism with false superiority is doing towards overall economic, social and spiritual growth of the people of this country and people who follow this culture, even if only one person at a time changes his/her mental attitude on reading such snippets of experiences, it would be enough for this much writing effort. You don't inhale each breath with a plan to change the world, with every breath its only the oxygen that matters, rest goes on independently. Hope sane people get sane message to ponder upon from this slightly painful but a lot more disturbing experience. (uff, see how many defenses one has to be prepared with even before talking about such topics in a supposedly free speech society!)]

What is so wrong with Bhagwad Geeta?

2011-07-23T13:54:00.001+05:30

Here's a discussion I had with someone over Bhagwad Geeta on TOI forum (Stop reading now if you don't want to go to the end, it may mislead):

mukunda (Bengaluru) replies to Siddharth

21 Jul, 2011 02:50 PM

Ok,lets read ch 4 verse 13. catur-varnyam maya srstam guna-karma-vibhagasah tasya kartaram api mam viddhy akartaram avyayam "According to the three modes of material nature and the work associated with them, the four divisions of human society are created by Me. And although I am the creator of this system, you should know that I am yet the nondoer, being unchangeable." 1st line"catur-varnyam maya srstam" 4 varnas are created by Me(Paramatma),2nd line "guna-karma-vibhagasah" where the vabhajan\categorization is based on one's guna composition and karma composition. 3rd and 4th line states how He is the non doer and unchangable. Sri Krishna says that each living entity is categorized into one of the 4 varnas based ONLY on their previous records of Gunas and their Karma. NOWHERE He mentions about janana\birth as the basis of categorization (example: a son of a brahmana is not a brahmana(by birth), but he becomes a brahmana by his gunas and karma), where as caste system is a system which is categorized purely based on birth(example: a son of a brahmana is automatically placed in the general merit(due to birth in a brahmana family) and a son of a scheduled caste is placed as a scheduled caste(due to birth in a scheduled caste family)). now can you please explain your statement "Gita encourages caste system. How can we allow a book that doesn't consider all humans as equal and believes that the humans are divided in 4 castes." Gita states that you earn your varna due to your previous deeds and guna records. this system is present everywhere. you dont ask a school dropout person to become an IAS officer. he has to earn this position by doing required action(passing IAS exam) and also including his guna composition. NOTE: its very easy to read anti hindu articles on the internet and comment by taking bits and pieces. but Satyameva Jayate, Truth alone triumphs. regards, mukunda

Agree (6)Disagree (6)Recommend (5)Offensive

Siddharth replies to mukunda

11 hrs ago (02:36 PM)

If Varna is NOT determined by birth then tell me how many people were there in our entire history that were the born in the house of shudras but became Brahmins by their deeds? You just can't name it. Because a son of brahmin is always considered a brahmin and it is assumed that he did good deeds in his past life. and same goes for the shudras. Hence, encouragement of caste system.

Agree (1)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)Offensive

Rahul Bhalerao (bglr) replies to mukunda

21 Jul, 2011 10:41 PM

Why doesn't Geeta clearly say that it is not the birth that determines varna? why make ambiguous statements? Previous deeds/karma means what? The deeds/education/skills acquired in this birth or the popular interpretation of previous birth's karma? If deeds decide varna then just like deeds can keep changing why can't a varna change? If it is only the deeds that determine varna, why are the atrocities based on varna justified? Let the incompetent be poor, why do we need to torture them? Why doesn't it acknowledge the scientific and philosophical truth that all human beings are equal? Are all these confusions left like that so that it can be interpreted to justify the injustice in the name of varna and dharma? We don't know of practical goodness of the bright interpretations of Geeta but we certainly know the dark side of it, that varna is birth based and has caused injustice for thousands of years.

Agree (5)Disagree (5)Recommend (3)Offensive

mukunda replies to Rahul Bhalerao

11 hrs ago (02:48 PM)

Namaste Rahul,answers to your queries are below 1:"Why doesnt Geeta clearly say that it is not the birth that determines varna? why make ambiguous statements?" ans: its not ambiguous, in fact Sri Krishna clearly states the definition of varna as based ONLY on guna and karma.example: definition of sphere is : a sphere is a perfectly round geometrical object in three-dimensional space, such as the shape of a round ball(wikipedia).here the sphere is defined by categorically placing it in the shape of round and in 3D space. now i would definitely look foolish if i state that its ambigious since it doesnt state anything about squares or rectangle shapes(apart from circular/round). it doesnt include any other shapes since it does not categorically fall in any other shapes. likewise, when Sri Krishna is clearly telling varna is based ONLY on guna and karma, asking the question of janma is irrelevent since this definition is not proof by negation/proof by shortlisting. in ch 18 verse 41, Sri Krishna reaffirms about the varnas "brahmana-kshatriya-visam "O Arjuna, the karma/acitivities of the brahmanas,ksatriyas,vaisyas and sudras are clearly divided according to the gunas/qualities born of their own nature" 2: "previous deeds/karma means what? " again Sri Krishna defines karma as sanchita karma prarabdha karma aagama karma. 1. sanchita karma (karma in storage, karma already done) 2. prArabdha karma (karma that has begun to bear fruit,karma being done) 3. AgAmi karma (karma resulting from future activities). this is a very huge topic to cover here. 3:"If deeds decide varna then just like deeds can keep changing why can't a varna change? " ans:varna does change; a brahmana can become a shudra and vice versa. example: Brahmarishi Vishwamitra was a kshatriya Raja/king and his original name was Kaushika. He was a Kshatriya who became a Brahmana due to his deeds(becoming a Brahmarishi). since nobody is born to any varna, they can change varna depending on their karma and guna. regards,

Rahul Bhalerao:

Mukunda, it is good that you brought the point of altering Varna! I suggest you take a look at the research paper 'who were shudras' by Dr. Ambedkar. There are number of cases where you see varna being changed in mythological history. But the question remains the same, first of all why divide the society in general, and second how did this division became so robust, rigid and remained based on birth for all the practical reality of 3 thousand years? What was it in the religion that caused an apparently mere labor hierarchy into a rigid system of varna and caste that is present in all its glory? Start reading all these mythological scriptures in more un-religious manner and you find the answers. Just like any other society in world, the priest class of brahmins secured unequivocal powers in the times of darkness through religion. Your own Upanishads are the story of competition between kshatriyas and brahmins. Off-course it is not just the Gita that made the varna/caste system the way it is, there has been a steady and well thought process behind it with all the conflict of interests doing their part of the job. Brahmins corrupted Vedas to gain religious sanction for their authority. Kshatriyas in competition with brahmins to control the society made their own versions by posing themselves as the incarnation of Gods. And again brahmins proved their superiority by reciting the brahmin authority through God's own mouth. In order to make sure that the powers of one generation remain reserved for rest of the coming generations of the same class, Varna had to be made rigid. If only Karma was the determinant of one's destiny, then what is the explanation for all the rigidity over thousands of year? Why didn't these apparently great thoughts resulted in a great society? Varna/Caste system as we know and as has existed for thousands of years, is the greatest poison in our society. Now please don't make the futile claims of how great system it used to be and how it must have benefited people. Buddha has already condemned this system very strongly even 2500 years ago. No matter how hard you try to sugar coat a poison, it will still have its effect. The effect is what we have witnessed but the poison is still we deny.

By the way, we don't have problem with round shape being defined specifically and interpreted in one single way without any ambiguity, because there is no way it could be interpreted differently, neither there has been any proof to any interpretation of it being a square. That is mathematical conformance. Coming back to your Varna and Karma and geeta etc., we do know for sure that Varna is indeed practiced based on birth, we all know about the interpretation that the karma of past birth causes one to be born in particular Varna, and the belief that a particular Varna person has particular qualities suitable for that Varna only. All these are well propagated interpretations supporting the rigid system (not flexible as claimed by you) and accepted throughout the Indian society (irrespective of the caste they belonged to or religious practices they had). We don't say Brahmins or Kshatriyas established and manipulated the Varna system for their benefit because they are inherently a cunning race, no, but they did do it certainly and cunningly because they happened to have powers in their hands which made them corrupt. Now that we know the truth of this evident corruption, at least now we can stay away from everything that has caused this corruption in first place. This is the precise reason why no anti-caste movement has ever called for a crusade against brahmins or upper castes but have condemned and burnt all these scriptures that have given opportunity for corruption and caused all the misery.

Out of my 7 questions, only first three were attempted to be answered to some extent, which are appearing non-satisfactory from the above reply. The core of the matter lies in later 4 questions which are not answered by Geeta admirers but better answered through the theory of religion based caste formation for power politics which is well explained by Dr. Ambedkar.

Gods' Religion or Religion's Temples

2011-07-13T01:37:00.003+05:30

Father says demolish all the temples, the son goes on demolishing a mosque for building a temple!

This is an English translation of an excerpt from 'Devancha Dharma ki Dharmachi Devle' by Prabodhankar Thackerey. Originally in Marathi, I happened to have read it long back and being awfully astonished by the stark difference between Prabodhankar and his son Bal Thackerey. Luckily found it here.

*Prabodhankar* says:

The all round degradation of Hindus is seen today and Hindu society is unfit for the term ‘society’. Hindu religion is a great Brahminic humbug and Hindu culture is a cracked dented pot with no base. Even during the great famine in whole of India, the Bhats are well fed because of generosity of Bahujans. And the non-brahmins are being crushed in the frank misdeeds of Brahminic terror.

Our religion is no religion at all. It is a humbug to crush the non-Brahmins under the Brahminic burden. In Brahminic humbug the first item of our slavery is the temple. Temples have come to Hindu religion recently. All our gods were shelterless for thousands of years say since 7000 BCE, time supposed to be date of Vedas. Till the end of Buddhism from India, say around beginning of Christian era, there were no temples in India.

Before discussing the methods of disposing of the gods and their temples, it is essential to see their origin from Semitic people, who were also, nomads like Aryans. They seem to be originators of temples.

Broadly speaking, there were no temples in India till 2nd or 3rd century A.D. Old shattered Brahminism defeated new reformist Buddhism and in second century CE, the old editions of ‘Ramayana’ and ‘Mahabharata’ were conflated for Brahminic hegemony and ‘Manusmriti’ was created. But even then there were no temples.

Since Ashoka times, there were caves and temples for Buddhist Bhikshus with images of Buddha. That is the origin of our Hindu temples. In eighth century CE appeared Adi Shankara, the savior of Brahminism. He purified the Scythians and made them Rajputs to kill in mass genocide all the Buddhists. He destroyed Buddhist monuments and banished the Buddhists. He created untouchability among the remaining Buddhists, for the first time in India. He destroyed Buddhist images and established there the Shiva-Lingas and converted some Buddhist images and renamed them as those of Shiva. Thus Buddhist Viharas became Brahmin temples.

Manusmriti, Puranas and temples are the triple noose around the necks of Hindus society. It is because of these three things that the Brahmins maintain their hegemony. If you destroy these three things Brahminism would vanish.

The temples had become the dens of misdeeds till the time of Mohammed of Gazani, who found tremendous wealth just by breaking a Shiva-Linga. Temples are life of religion, the Bhats shout. When omnipotent Somanatha could not protect himself, why the Brahmins fed on kings’ treasury should fight, they ran away. If somebody shows us one single Brahmin fighting for god in the history, we will give him our publications free for one year.

Hindus knew there can be no self-upliftment by worshiping the stone, even then they flock to temples. The secret lies in 18 Puranas created for feeding of Brahmins. All slaves are so mad of god and especially of the amorous ‘*Bhagwat*’, that they prostrate in front of Brahmins and drink water washings of his feet. Many say Puranas are obscenity, I say they are latrines. All lands given to temples are meant for the Brahmins and ornaments of gods are in necks of Brahmin women all the year except on festival days.

Since the Somanatha got the kicks of Mohammed, the temples have become dens of ganja smoking *gosains*, lazy beggars, rowdy goons and well fed-parasitic Bhats. The temples have not contributed anything to progress of Hindu religion or society or justice more than any brothel has done. When 96 percent of population is craving for education, the army of Bhats is feeding on temple property.

Bhats being the born fathers of temples prohibit others to the temples. The dirty stream of Brahmin non-brahmin conflict has its origin in temples. Those touchable and untouchable Hindus who wish to finish this conflict must hammer first on temples. In the name of democracy, as radical reformer, I declare without caring for anybody’s feelings, that these are not temples but the dens of Satan.

In democratic atmosphere today nobody can oppose human rights. Democracy should enter the temples now. People craving for political freedom must destroy all institutions of slavery. We are suggesting three methods of disposing of the Hindu temples.

First, Boycott the temples thinking them as dens of Satan. It is slow process and may take centuries as the Brahmins have accumulated enough wealth that will last them for next thousand years.

Second, ignoring customs and traditions all Hindus including untouchables should, in the name of ‘*hindutva*’, capture these temples. But this is not for reformers. For us, it is preferable to shun away from these centers spreading venom of social hate.

Lastly, the temples got corrupted because the Bhats entered there. They entered because of stone gods therein. If you remove all gods and put all of them from all over the country in one single museum in a city, you can use the empty temples and their property for public good. You may form a committee of Hindus to decide how best these can be used as libraries, research laboratories, hospitals, orphanages, lecture halls, observatories, gymnasiums, community common dining halls and other public purposes. If the Hindus can not show this courage, they are not only unfit for ‘swaraj’ but also are unfit for living.

An angry Brahmin!

2010-05-09T17:25:00.005+05:30

Yesterday, on visiting Mathura-Vrindavan, I got one more insight and perspective about the caste society in India. The Brahmin guide, who was picking stories from mythology and engaging people, suddenly got very angry when some visitors raised objections over the service of the tourist agency. I was amazed to see a priest who was giving some calm spiritual speech getting angry so quickly. During the later casual chat, he mentioned that he could not help getting angry, because he was born in a brahmin family. His claim about himself was that a brahmin cannot control his krodh (anger).

It is interesting to know how people believe that their behaviors are attributed to their castes. That too, an anger being associated with the people who control the spiritual aspects of the religion and the only one to have the right to be the priest.

Later, many of the priests insisted on making people worship the way the priests want(i.e. mostly by donations!). But how could I follow them? Being a true atheist, I was there to only see what is there and how it functions.

Thinking is injurious to friendship!

2008-04-23T00:13:00.004+05:30

At the mid-night hour, random thought came to my mind..

"Its always good to think twice before you talk, but when you don't need to think while talking to someone.. thats when you have found a real friend.. and probably a real love too!"

There is a saying, "think before you talk, don't talk before you think". Thats actually good, because that prevents you from hurting someone or give wrong impression of yourself. But when it comes to friendship, the rule seems to invalidate itself. How could you hurt your beloved friend? Your instincts should never allow you to do that. Even if it happens, you will surely regret and the true friend will certainly understand. This would strengthen the bond even more. A friend knows you inside out, how could you make wrong impressions? Friends don't mind you eating their cakes. Friends don't mind you turning their requests down. Friends don't mind having different opinions. And friends don't mind putting own life for each other.

So why bother? Actually when you think, its because you are concerned about the worldly rules and customs. Friends simply don't need them. A true love has to be completely free. Free of all the boundaries! Limitless!!

Believe me, its really difficult to find someone that you don't need to think before talking to, but if you do find someone, be assured, thats the real one!

Paper is more patient than man

2008-04-21T00:47:00.005+05:30

Today I got my hand on 'The Diary Of A Young Girl", Anne Frank, and I missed a heart bit only on the second page on reading this.. it was so true..

"There is a saying that 'paper is more patient that man'; it came back to me on one of my slightly melancholy days, while I sat chin in hand, feeling too bored and limp even to make up my mind whether to go out or stay at home. Yes, there is no doubt that paper is patient and I don't intend to show this cardboard-covered notebook, bearing the proud name of 'diary', to anyone, unless I find a real friend, boy or girl, probably nobody cares. And now I come to the root of the matter, the reason for my starting a diary: it is that I have no such real friend.

Let me put it more clearly, since no one will believe that a girl of thirteen feels herself quite alone in the world, nor is it so. I have darling parents and a sister of sixteen. I know about thirty people whom one might call friends--I have strings of boy friends, anxious to catch a glimpse of me and who failing that, peep at me through mirrors in class. I have relations, aunts and uncles, who are darlings too, a good home, no--I don't seem to lack anything. But it's the same with all my friends, just fun and joking, nothing more. I can never bring myself to talk of anything outside the common round. We don't seem to be able to get any closer, that is the root of the trouble. Perhaps I lack confidence, but anyway, there it is, a stubborn fact and I don't seem to be able to do anything about it."

Apologies for such a long quotation, but I could not crop any of this part. It is so touching.. even after "I don't seem to lack anything", there is something lacking. No, I did not feel 'alone in the world' when I was a boy of thirteen, I had bestest of my friend circle that time. I can certainly describe that as 'the best days of my life'. But the reason I felt so much for these lines is that, it feels awfully true at twenty-four. The scene of 'I sat chin in hand', resemble to my confusion whether to call someone or not and end up not calling at all. I have so many contacts and friends, but they all seem to be limited to work, jokes and phonebook, where is the real one? The problem seems to come from inside, somewhere.. 'I lack confidence', to be closer. Perhaps, it's not just me. I think, everyone has this utter need of a 'closer than heart' and almost everyone lacks it. May be our own walls of 'self' don't allow us to get any closer. The question is, how to bring the walls down, how difficult is it for a human to connect to other human? Why do people are so less patient even to listen to what other person has to say and express? Really, 'paper is more patient than man!'.

Buddha says..

2008-04-15T01:38:00.006+05:30

"This world is sustained by the laws of Nature, hence there is (seemingly) no creator of this universe (Brahma). If Brahma is the creator of world, he would be responsible for the sufferings, found throughout and suffered by all living beings."

नमो तस्स भगवतो अरहतो सम्मासंबुद्धस्स

2008-02-01T01:27:00.000+05:30

I already have two blogs. Then whats the occasion for the third one?

My first blog started as a general personal blog. But later it turned out to be more centric towards work and technology related stuff. Now, few technology related planets are currently fetching this blog. Being on a planet, I cannot put everything, mostly off-topic posts. So, my subjects for this blog have been narrowed down to a great extent. Of course there are ways to filter posts depending upon the tags, and given that I do extensive tagging for my posts, it should not be a problem. But most of the planets are not doing the filtering itself. Even I don't wish to spam them with personal stuff. I need a special place for it.

Another one was created for sharing my fun with poetry. Its not very active these days. Mostly because I am not giving time for poetry now. I hope to be able to do that soon. Being of specific nature, I cannot write everything on this blog as well. I need to write something that is not poetry but not even a dry work or science and technology.

So I felt an utter urge to have one more blog, just for life (as in large and small) related things. Something more personal, nearer to heart, more spiritual or even just for fun. Let me embrace a new 'Sikkha'.

सिक्खा पदम् समादियामी!