Paul Crofts' Blog: Views from an Eco-Socialist

How can we challenge racism

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Thu, 03 Jul 2025 14:50:00 +0000

https://open.substack.com/pub/paulcrofts/p/how-can-we-challenge-racism?

How might we transition from Capitalism to an Eco-Socialist Society?

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Mon, 30 Jun 2025 18:46:00 +0000

Post created using AI.

Moving from capitalism to an eco-socialist society means transforming an economy based on profit, extraction, and inequality into one rooted in ecological balance, social justice, and democratic control of the means of production. It’s not just a climate policy; it’s a revolutionary restructuring of how we produce, consume, and relate to nature and each other.

---

🛤️ How Do We Transition to Eco-Socialism?

The transition involves three overlapping fronts:

1. Ecological Transformation of the Economy

End fossil fuel dependency through rapid and just transition to renewables

Public, democratic ownership of energy, water, transport, housing, and land

Relocalize production to reduce ecological footprints and re-embed economies in ecosystems

Redefine productivity to mean sustainability and care, not growth or output per hour

2. Class-Based Power Shift

Redistribute power and wealth from corporations and rentier classes to workers, communities, and ecosystems

Replace the capitalist imperative of growth with socially planned production for human and planetary need

3. Cultural and Political Revolution

Dismantle ideologies of domination over nature and others

Build eco-conscious values of stewardship, reciprocity, sufficiency, and solidarity

---

🌱 Opportunities of Eco-Socialism

Opportunity Description

Climate Justice Tackles root causes of climate crisis: capitalism’s need for endless growth and extraction

Democratic Control Workers and communities gain direct say over what’s produced and how

Restoration of Nature Degrowth of destructive sectors enables rewilding, sustainable farming, and biodiversity recovery

Redefining Work Shift to meaningful work in care, education, ecological regeneration, and maintenance of life

Global Solidarity Ends neocolonial resource plunder; supports Global South-led ecological development

---

⚠️ Problems and Contradictions

Problem Challenge

Capitalist Resistance

Fossil fuel elites, agribusiness, and financial capital will fight fiercely

Labour-Green Divide

Tension between jobs in polluting sectors and climate imperatives

Greenwashing and Co-optation “Green capitalism” (carbon markets, ESG) delays real change while preserving corporate power

State Capture

Governments tied to corporate donors, military, and imperial logistics are reluctant reformers

Global Inequity Eco-socialism must address North-South injustices and include reparative ecological internationalism

---

🛠️ The Role of the Working Class, Trade Unions & Autonomous Social Movements

This is where the real engine of transformation lies.

✅ 1. The Working Class: The Ecological Agent of Change

Role Description

Ecological Strike Force

Use strategic strikes to demand climate action (e.g., dockworkers refusing to load coal, energy workers demanding transition plans)9

Workplace Conversion

Lead efforts to convert polluting industries (e.g., aviation, car manufacturing) to green production under worker control

Green Job Creation

Fight for public investment in renewables, care, and repair economies with unionized, dignified jobs

Democratize Production

Demand ownership models where workers & communities decide what is made, how, and with what impact

> ❗ Key Challenge: Labour must see itself not just as a defender of existing jobs, but as the builder of a new mode of life—one that values survival and sustainability over GDP.

---

✅ 2. Trade Unions: From Economic Defenders to Eco-Socialist Organizers

Role Description

Just Transition

Leaders

Unions should lead the design of decarbonization pathways that protect workers

Negotiators of Green Deals

Bargain for shorter hours, job guarantees, reskilling, and community control

Public Service Reclaimers

Organize for renationalization and democratization of key sectors (e.g., energy, rail)

Alliances with Climate Movements Build bridges with climate justice campaigns to avoid false "jobs vs. climate" framing

> 💡 Trade unions must reject "social partnership" models that tie them to capital's greenwashing agenda.

---

✅ 3. Autonomous Social Movements: The Ethical and Imaginative Vanguard

Role Description

Expose Greenwashing

Direct action against fossil banks, green colonialism, carbon offset scams

Radicalize the Narrative

Shift discourse from climate policy tweaks to system change

Prefigurative Politics

Build community gardens, mutual aid networks, and eco-communes that show what’s possible

Youth and Indigenous Leadership Indigenous struggles, land defenders, and youth strike movements bring moral clarity and historical memory

> ✊ These movements keep pressure on unions and left parties to avoid compromise with ecocidal capitalism.

---

🔄 Strategy: Uniting the Three Forces

Strategy Tactic

Eco-Strike Convergence

Coordinated strikes (e.g., students, dockworkers, health workers) for climate and justice

Public-Common Alliances

Combine public ownership with community and worker governance

Dual Power Building

Create grassroots structures (assemblies, councils, federations) that can one day replace capitalist institutions

Internationalist Solidarity

Cancel Global South debt, fight for climate reparations, and link movements across borders

---

🧩 Conclusion

Eco-socialism is not just environmentalism with red flags, but a total rethinking of our economy, power structures, and way of life. The working class, trade unions, and autonomous social movements each bring essential tools:

Labour brings mass power in production

Unions bring structure and negotiation strength

Movements bring moral vision and radical experimentation

When these forces align, we don’t just demand a better world—we begin building it.

Created using AI ChatGPT

Paul Crofts

Email: paulcrofts@gmail.com

BlueSky: @paulcrofts@bsky.social

Facebook: www.facebook.com/crofts2

What would life be like in an Eco-Socialist Society?

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Sun, 29 Jun 2025 11:19:00 +0000

Life under an eco-socialist society would be fundamentally different from life in today's capitalist or state-socialist systems, focusing on sustainability, ecological balance, social justice, and democratic control of resources. Here’s a broad outline of what it might look like across different domains of life:

---

🌱 Core Principles of Eco-Socialism

Ecological sustainability: The economy and society are structured around preserving ecosystems and biodiversity.

Democratic control: The people collectively manage resources, not corporations or a central elite.

Social equality: Economic and social systems are designed to eliminate exploitation and ensure equitable access to life’s essentials.

Anti-capitalist: It rejects the growth-at-all-costs model and private ownership of the means of production.

---

🏘️ Daily Life

Work: Work would be oriented toward meaningful, socially beneficial activities—especially green jobs like renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, education, and healthcare.

The workweek would likely be shorter, emphasizing work-life balance and community engagement.

Automation and technology would be used to reduce labor burdens, not to increase profits.

Housing: Housing would be considered a human right. Homes would be eco-friendly, energy-efficient, and collectively owned or regulated—no private landlords profiting off rent.

Food: Food systems would be localized and organic, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and monoculture agribusiness. Urban farms and community-supported agriculture would be common.

Consumption: Consumer culture would shift from quantity to quality. People would prioritize repair, reuse, and community sharing (e.g., tool libraries, clothing swaps).

---

🚌 Infrastructure & Transport

Public transport would be vastly expanded, accessible, and powered by renewable energy. Car use would be drastically reduced.

Urban planning would prioritize walkable cities, green spaces, and self-sufficient communities to reduce environmental impact.

---

⚖️ Economy

Decentralized planning: Instead of top-down state control or market anarchy, democratic planning would guide production and consumption, balancing local and global needs.

Common ownership: Major industries (energy, water, transportation, healthcare) would be publicly or cooperatively owned.

Money and markets: Some versions of eco-socialism allow limited markets or local currencies, while others envision a post-market, needs-based economy.

---

📚 Education & Culture

Education would emphasize ecological literacy, critical thinking, cooperation, and community resilience.

Culture would be less commercialized, with more support for the arts, local traditions, and collective creativity.

---

🌍 Global Relations

An eco-socialist society would promote international solidarity over competition, helping poorer nations transition to sustainability without exploitation.

Climate justice would be central—historically high-emitting nations would take more responsibility for mitigation and reparations.

---

🧠 Potential Challenges

Balancing local autonomy with global coordination.

Avoiding bureaucracy or technocracy in democratic planning.

Managing the transition from capitalism without economic collapse or authoritarianism.

Cultivating the cultural shift away from consumerism and individualism.

---

In short, life under eco-socialism would center around cooperation, environmental stewardship, and collective well-being rather than profit, competition, and consumption. It wouldn’t be utopia—but it would aim to be a just and livable world within planetary limits.

Would you like an example of a typical day in such a society in the West?

Great! Here's a narrative example of a typical day in the life of someone living in an eco-socialist society. Let’s call them Maya, a 34-year-old urban farmer and community educator in the city of Solara, a mid-sized eco-socialist city in the year 2045.

---

🌅 Morning

Maya wakes up around 7:30 AM in her cooperative housing complex, a solar-powered building designed with passive heating and rooftop gardens. Her home is one of ten units in a worker-owned housing collective, where decisions are made democratically and maintenance is shared.

She starts her day with a community breakfast made from locally grown food—beans, greens, and fresh bread. The ingredients came from within 30 kilometers, mostly from cooperatives and urban farms (including her own). Food is largely not commodified anymore—it’s distributed via food commons or solidarity networks, rather than through purchase.

---

🌿 Mid-Morning

Maya bikes to her job at Solara Green School, where she teaches a class on permaculture and eco-history. The school curriculum emphasizes practical skills, ecological knowledge, and critical thinking.

After class, she heads to the nearby community food forest to help organize a workshop on composting. The work is part of her contribution to the Green Labor Assembly, the local council where all work is socially organized and democratically planned. People can propose projects, vote on priorities, and coordinate labor-sharing.

---

🌞 Afternoon

After lunch at the local community café (run by a cooperative), Maya attends a participatory planning meeting via video link. Citizens and work collectives discuss seasonal resource planning—how much water can be sustainably used from nearby watersheds, how to allocate labor for upcoming infrastructure repairs, etc.

There's no single boss or central government issuing orders—instead, decisions are decentralized and transparent, made via nested councils at neighborhood, city, and bioregional levels.

---

🌳 Evening

Later, Maya walks to a nearby amphitheater in the commons where a local music collective is performing. Art and culture have flourished under eco-socialism, as creators no longer have to sell their art for survival—basic needs like housing, healthcare, and food are guaranteed, freeing up time for meaningful pursuits.

Before bed, she checks the community bulletin board (both digital and physical) for upcoming workshops, mutual aid requests, and democratic votes on local infrastructure projects.

---

🌌 Reflection

Maya’s life is not driven by competition, overwork, or chasing wealth. She’s part of a society built on mutual care, ecological responsibility, and democratic collaboration. The world still has challenges—climate repair is ongoing, and debates can get intense—but there's a shared sense of purpose.

What about a day in the life of someone in the Global South?

Let’s follow Ayo, a 29-year-old cooperative engineer and agroecology organizer, living in the rural region of Nyanda, in what used to be western Kenya. It’s 2045, and Ayo’s community is part of a regional eco-socialist federation in East Africa.

---

🌄 Morning in Nyanda

Ayo wakes early with the sun, greeted by birdsong and the soft hum of the solar water pump her cooperative helped install two years ago. Her home is made of local, sustainable materials—cool in the hot season, warm in the rainy one.

Breakfast is simple but fresh: millet porridge, bananas, and tea from the community garden. Since eco-socialism was adopted, land ownership has shifted to communal stewardship, and large plantations were returned to the people for local, regenerative farming.

---

👩🏿‍🔧 Mid-Morning: Work & Collaboration

Ayo bikes to a solar repair cooperative hub, where she and a team of technicians maintain renewable infrastructure across nearby villages. The work is coordinated through the People’s Ecological Council, which plans labor based on community needs and environmental limits—not profit.

Instead of chasing foreign contracts or NGO grants, Ayo’s team works directly with local agroecology collectives and education brigades training young people in ecological skills—solar repair, water harvesting, soil rebuilding.

Resources are shared across the region via a solidarity economy: tools, seed banks, transport networks, and data systems are collectively managed.

---

🥘 Midday: Sharing and Rest

At midday, she shares lunch with elders under a large mango tree—a communal space rebuilt after the region phased out private land titles. Meals are made collectively, often as part of rotating kitchen cooperatives that handle daily nourishment for the working teams.

After lunch, there’s time for rest, prayer, or storytelling—a rhythm embraced since long work hours were reduced and community health became a top priority. “Productivity” isn’t measured in profit anymore, but in well-being, ecosystem health, and cultural vitality.

---

🌾 Afternoon: Seeds & Sovereignty

Ayo heads to a regional agroforestry site, where several communities are planting climate-resilient native trees and crops together. The land was once depleted by industrial agriculture, but it’s now part of a long-term bioregional restoration plan, informed by both traditional knowledge and open-source science.

Everyone, regardless of gender or age, has a say in decisions through village and watershed assemblies. Young people learn directly from elders and practitioners—not through tests and grades, but through mentorship and practice.

---

🌙 Evening: Collective Joy & Learning

At sunset, people gather for storytelling and music—drums, laughter, poetry, and dance fill the air. Culture, once suppressed by both colonizers and neoliberal economics, is now celebrated as a central part of life.

Later, Ayo meets virtually with other regional engineers and planners in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and the Congo Basin. The Pan-African Eco-Socialist Federation coordinates across borders to ensure water rights, technology access, and climate migration strategies are just and democratic.

---

🌍 A Life Reconnected

Ayo's world is still healing from climate disasters, displacement, and decades of neocolonial extraction—but life now is built around resilience, justice, and ecological reciprocity. No one is rich in the capitalist sense, but no one is poor, either.

Instead of depending on imports or charity, Ayo's community grows its own food, builds its own tech, teaches its own history—and plans its own future.

Generated by AI.

Paul Crofts

Email: paulcrofts@gmail.com

BlueSky: @paulcrofts@bsky.social

Facebook: www.facebook.com/crofts2

The Wellingborough Diggers Declaration of 1649

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Tue, 29 Apr 2025 17:41:00 +0000

The Wellingborough Diggers

A Tribute to Mischief-making on a Grand Scale

The Wellingborough Diggers:

A Tribute to Mischief-making on a Grand Scale

I would like dedicate this short post to Les Parsons. Les was responsible for undertaking the original research in the Digger movement in general and the Wellingborough Diggers in particular during the 1970s. Much of what I am about to say is as a result of this work. But Les was also a local political campaigner whom I deeply respected and admired. Without Les I would have probably remained unaware of the Digger movement in general and the Wellingborough Diggers in particular.

I have called this “a tribute to mischief-making on a grand scale” because the contribution of the Diggers cannot be underestimated as we struggle into the 21^st century with the challenges of gross and disgusting inequalities of wealth and income across the globe that is there for all to see and the threat to our very existence as a consequence of us raping the earth and its environment leding to global heating. The Diggers dreamt of a new type of world and that dream is still with us today, albeit the language in which the dream is described may have changed over the passage of time. I have used the term mischief, because this is the word used to describe the Diggers at the time in a contemporary letter of April 15^th 1650, from the government of the day (Council of State) to “ … Mr. Pentlow, Justice of Peace for County Northampton”. (Mr. Pentlow – a good Northamptonshire name!).

The letter said:

“We approve your proceedings with the Levellers in those parts, and doubt not you are sensible of the mischief these designs tend to, and of the necessity to proceed effectively against them. If the laws in force against those who intrude upon other men’s properties, and that forbid and direct the punishing of all riotous assemblies and seditious and tumultuous meetings, be put in execution, there will not want means to preserve the public peace against attempts of this sort of people”.

In particular I draw your attention to the words “… mischief these designs tend to, and of the necessity to proceed effectively against them.”

What were the Digger’s designs and actions that were so threatening that “… there will not want means to preserve the public peace”?

In a unique “Declaration of the Grounds and Reasons” (reproduced on the front cover) issued by the Wellingborough Diggers in 1649 (1650), we have an opportunity to hear their own voice across the centuries:

Their actions were very simple:

“(We) have begun and give consent to dig up, manure and sow corn upon the Commons and Waste Ground called Bareshanks, belonging to the people of Wellinborrow by those that have subscribed and hundreds more that give consent”

Why were they taking this action?

“We are in Wellinborrow in one parish of 1169 persons that receive alms… our trading is decayed; our wives and children cry for bread; our lives are a burden to us, divers of us having 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 in family, and we cannot get bread for them by our labour. Rich men’s hearts are hardened; they will not give us if we beg at their doors. If we steal, the law will end our lives. Divers of the poor are starved to death already; and it were better for us that are living to die by the Sword than by the famine …”

How did they justify their action – what underpinned the philosophy or set of ideas that encouraged them?

“We find (in the word of God) that God made the earth for the use and comfort of all mankind, and sat him in it to till and dress it…
God never gave to any sort of people that they should have it all to themselves and shut out the rest …
We find that no creature that ever God made was deprived of the benefit of the Earth, but mankind … it is nothing but covetousness, pride and hardness of heart that hath caused man so far to degenerate.
That in the last day the oppressor and proud man shall cease and God will restore the waste places of the Earth to the use and comfort of man, and that none shall hurt or destroy in all His Holy Mountain.
We have great encouragement from two righteous Acts, which parliament of England has set forth, the one against kingly power and the other to make England a free Common-wealth”

Within a few weeks the Digger enterprise in Wellingborough had been brought to an end by the forces of “law and order” - unleashed by the nice Mr. Pentlow, Justice of the Peace, on instruction from the Government. He referred to them as a “mischief” that had to be dealt with. The Wellingborough Digger’s leaders were arrested, taken to Northampton, and charged with riot and affray. After this nothing is known of what happened to them.

I don’t think it was so much what the Diggers did that rattled the ruling class of the day (is sowing seed on common land so threatening?), so much as the ideas that the declaration promoted and were spreading throughout the country with other Digger colonies emerging in other parts of the country.

The Digger movement was reflective of the times- the flourishing of democracy (albeit limited to some men of property) and it did not last long before Cromwell reined it in and established his own dictatorship). This was also the time when the monarchy was ended, in January 1649, with the beheading of Charles I. Within the ranks of the Cromwellian New Model Army there was the Leveller movement with its call for a wider political democracy (“the poorest that lives hath as true a right to give a vote as well as the richest and greatest”), and it was time of flourishing debate and discussion on the future society that people wanted to see where demands for political democracy went hand in and with demands for economic democracy through the common ownership of land. The writings of Gerard Winstanley especially spring to mind – the spiritual leader of the Digger movement.

All this amounted to a vision of an alternative society without exploitation, without private ownership of land, respect for the environment, and a society of equals, without “Kingly power” and a Common-wealth for all. Such ideas had to be smashed, and smashed quickly – and they were.

But smashing the movements of that time – the Levellers, the Diggers - was easier than smashing these new ideas that were emerging.

And what is clear is that these ideas resonate through history right up to the 21^st century. We owe a tremendous debt to those “ragged band of Diggers” that Leon Rosselson refers to in his famous ballad The World Turned Upside Down.

May there be mischief on a grand scale! May it start from today.

Paul Crofts

May 3rd 2025: May Day and Wellingborough Diggers Fest 2025

The Diggers – a brief history

This information is taken from Wikipedia. Footnotes are mine.

The year 1649 was a time of great social unrest in England. The Parliamentarians had won the First English Civil War but failed to negotiate a constitutional settlement with the defeated King Charles I. When members of Parliament and the Grandees in the New Model Army were faced with Charles' perceived duplicity, they tried and executed him.

Government through the King's Privy Council was replaced with a new body called the Council of State, which due to fundamental disagreements within a weakened Parliament was dominated by the Army. Many people were active in politics, suggesting alternative forms of government to replace the old order. Royalists wished to place King Charles II on the throne; men like Oliver Cromwell wished to govern with a plutocratic Parliament voted in by an electorate based on property, similar to that which was enfranchised before the civil war; agitators called Levellers, influenced by the writings of John Lilburne, wanted parliamentary government based on an electorate of every male head of a household; Fifth Monarchy Men advocated a theocracy; and the Diggers, led by Winstanley, advocated a more radical solution.

Gerrard Winstanley and 14 others published a pamphlet[1] in which they called themselves the True Levellers to distinguish their ideas from those of the Levellers. Once they put their idea into practice and started to cultivate common land, they became known as "Diggers" by both opponents and supporters. The Diggers' beliefs were informed by the Winstanley's writings which envisioned an ecological interrelationship between humans and nature, acknowledging the inherent connections between people and their surroundings[2]. Winstanley declared that "true freedom lies where a man receives his nourishment and preservation, and that is in the use of the earth".

An undercurrent of political thought which has run through English society for many generations and resurfaced from time to time (for example, the Peasants' Revolt in 1381) was present in some of the political factions of the 17th century, including those who formed the Diggers, and held the common belief that England had become subjugated by the "Norman Yoke." This legend offered an explanation that at one time a golden Era had existed in England before the Norman Conquest in 1066. From the conquest on, the Diggers argued, the "common people of England" had been robbed of their birth rights and exploited by a foreign ruling class.

St. George's Hill, Weybridge, Surrey

The Council of State received a letter in April 1649 reporting that several individuals had begun to plant vegetables in common land on Saint George's Hill, Weybridge near Cobham, Surrey at a time when food prices reached an all-time high. Sanders reported that they had invited "all to come in and help them, and promise them meat, drink, and clothes." They intended to pull down all enclosures and cause the local populace to come and work with them. They claimed that their number would be several thousand within ten days. "It is feared they have some design in hand." In the same month, the Diggers issued their most famous pamphlet and manifesto, called "The True Levellers Standard Advanced".

At the behest of the local landowners, the commander of the New Model Army, Sir Thomas Fairfax, duly arrived with his troops and interviewed Winstanley and another prominent member of the Diggers, William Everard. Everard suspected that the Diggers were in serious trouble and soon left the group. Fairfax, meanwhile, having concluded that Diggers were doing no harm, advised the local landowners to use the courts.

Winstanley remained and continued to write about the treatment they received. The harassment from the Lord of the Manor, Francis Drake (not the famous Francis Drake, who had died more than 50 years before), was both deliberate and systematic: he organised gangs in an attack on the Diggers, including numerous beatings and an arson attack on one of the communal houses. Following a court case, in which the Diggers were forbidden to speak in their own defence, they were found guilty of being Ranters, a radical sect associated with liberal sexuality (though in fact Winstanley had reprimanded Ranter Laurence Clarkson for his sexual practices).Having lost the court case, if they had not left the land, then the army could have been used to enforce the law and evict them; so they abandoned St George's Hill in August 1649, much to the relief of the local freeholders.

Wellingborough, Northamptonshire

There was another community of Diggers close to Wellingborough in Northamptonshire. In March 1649, the community published a declaration which started:

A Declaration of the Grounds and Reasons why we the Poor Inhabitants of the Town of Wellingborrow, in the County of Northampton, have begun and give consent to dig up, manure and sow Corn upon the Common, and waste ground, called Bareshanke[3] belonging to the Inhabitants of Wellinborrow, by those that have Subscribed and hundreds more that give Consent....

This colony was probably founded as a result of contact with the Surrey Diggers. In late March 1649, four emissaries from the Surrey colony were arrested in Buckinghamshire bearing a letter signed by the Surrey Diggers including Gerrard Winstanley and Robert Coster inciting people to start Digger colonies and to provide money for the Surrey Diggers. According to the newspaper A Perfect Diurnall the emissaries had travelled a circuit through the counties of Surrey, Middlesex, Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Berkshire, Huntingdonshire and Northamptonshire before being apprehended.

On April 15, 1649, the Council of State ordered Mr Pentlow, a justice of the peace for Northamptonshire to proceed against 'the Levellers in those parts' and to have them tried at the next Quarter Session.The Iver Diggers recorded that, nine of the Wellingborough Diggers were arrested and imprisoned in Northampton jail and although no charges could be proved against them the justice refused to release them.

Captain William Thompson, the leader of the failed "Banbury mutiny" of Levellers (most were killed in the churchyard in Burford whilst trying to escape) was killed - in a skirmish on his way to join the Digger community in Wellingborough - by soldiers loyal to Oliver Cromwell in May 1649.

[1] The New Law Of Righteousness (January 26, 1649), Gerrard Winstanley

[2] The Diggers have also been described as the first British “communists” and “socialists” because they also sought an egalitarian society, challenged the privilege and wealth accruing from land ownership, and opposed “kingly power”. They said in the Wellingborough Digger Declaration: “God made the Earth for use and comfort of all mankind, and let him in to till and dress it, and said, that in the sweat of his brow he should eat his bread; and also we find that, that God never gave it to any sort of people, that they should have it all to themselves, and shut out all the rest, but he saith, The Earth hath he given to all the children of men, which is everyman”

[3] Bareshanke is a piece of land on the left-hand side of the road coming from Wellingborough (from the Park Farm Industrial Estate past the “Mad Mile”) at the junction where it meets the Sywell to Little Harrowden Road. This has now been developed as distribution warehouse!

The Richer, The Poorer with Stuart Lansley

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:07:00 +0000

We were delighted to welcome Stuart Lansley to an Independent Socialists in Wellingborough meeting held on March 24th 2024 via Zoom.

Stuart is the author a 2021 book "The Richer, The Poorer - How Britain Enriched the Few and Failed the Poor".

"The Richer, The Poorer charts the rollercoaster history of both rich and poor and the mechanisms that link wealth and impoverishment. This landmark book shows how, for 200 years, Britain’s most powerful elites have enriched themselves at the expense of surging inequality, mass poverty and weakened social resilience. Stewart Lansley reveals how Britain’s model of ‘extractive capitalism’ – with a small elite securing an excessive slice of the economic cake – has created a two-century-long ‘high-inequality, high-poverty’ cycle, one broken for only a brief period after the Second World War. Why, he asks, are rich and poor citizens judged by very different standards? Why has social progress been so narrowly shared? With growing calls for a fairer post-COVID-19 society, what needs to be done to break Britain’s destructive poverty/inequality cycle?"(Google Books)

Stuart is also visiting fellow in the School of Policy Studies, the University of Bristol, a Council member of the Progressive Economy Forum and a Research Associate at the Compass think-tank. He is a fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences and has written widely on poverty, wealth and inequality. His recent books include A Sharing Economy (2016), Breadline Britain, The Rise of Mass Poverty (with Joanna Mack, 2015) and The Cost of Inequality (2011).

Holocaust Memorial Day Commemoration: Saturday, January 28th 2017

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:24:00 +0000

The text of my HMD presentation to the Wellingborough commemorative event held on Saturday January 28th 2017 at the Wellingborough Museum

Good morning. Thank you for this opportunity to give this presentation to you today. It’s an honour and privilege and I hope that you find it interesting, but also challenging – for which I don’t apologise!

Yesterday was Holocaust Memorial Day which is commemorated on 27 January every year in commemoration of the liberation of Auschwitz extermination camp in Poland by Russian/Soviet troops in 1945 towards the end of the Second World War.

What was the Holocaust?

Between 1941 and 1945, the Nazis attempted to kill all of Europe’s Jews. This systematic and planned attempt to murder all Jewish people in Europe is known as the Holocaust (The Shoah in Hebrew) and it is unique in Human history. The first time an attempt was made to eliminate a whole group of people based on their religion/race/ethnicity using the whole apparatus of a modern state and society.

The holocaust also resulted in the murder of millions more as a result of prejudice and hatred: homosexuals, Gypsies, Jehovah’s Witnesses, disabled people, Black people and other ethnic minorities, and political opponents of the Nazis.

From the time they assumed power in 1933, the Nazis used propaganda, persecution, and legislation to deny human and civil rights to Jews and other groups. They used centuries of antisemitism (hatred of Jewish people) as their foundation and new pseudo-scientific ideas of eugenics and the notation iof creating a “perfect human being”. By the end of the Holocaust, six million Jewish men, women and children had either perished in ghettos or through mass-shootings, in concentration camps and by gassing in extermination camps, such as Auschwitz.

Can you imagine what six million people looks like? It’s hard. That’s at least 200+ football stadiums (with 30,000 capacities each) or 100 towns the size of Wellingborough: women, men, children and older people, all murdered.

Ivor Perl

Today we are going to watch a short film clip, in which this man, Ivor Perl, who was born in Hungary, tells us his experiences during the Holocaust.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxSlCzOB1IY

Watching Ivor’s film tells us about the stories beyond those statistics which are too huge for us to comprehend. It tells us that the Holocaust was the story of Jewish people being forced to move from their own homes to ghettos and camps. Of families being forced apart. Of the diseases like typhus which were allowed to spread as people were forced to live in appalling conditions. And his story tells us that half of Hungary’s Jewish population were killed in only four months in 1944, and that Ivor himself lost all but one of his 8 brothers and sisters, and both of his parents.

Ivor’s testimony also tells us that, for Ivor, the legacy of the Holocaust continues. He tells us that he fears people more than he fears God; it was people who played with him as friends one week and on the second week herded him and his family into a ghetto. He speaks of his daily reminders of things which happened to him in the past.

But he also speaks of his delight at moving to the UK and beginning to set up a life here, displaying so proudly in his home the pictures of his children and grandchildren. He tells us about his talks in schools and community groups, and that he feels if only one person hears his story and makes a difference, it was worth his while.

There are hundreds of us here today. On Holocaust Memorial Day we can reflect on the ways in which we can make a difference after hearing Ivor’s testimony. We can reflect on the particular questions that Ivor asked in the film.

What has it helped?

He asks ’What has the world learned since 1945?’ and, sadly, since the end of World War Two, there have been genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia, and Darfur where millions of people have been murdered simply because of who they are. This suggests the world has not learnt much. So what can we learn?

Our understanding of social psychology – how our brains work within a social context - might have some of the answers. This tells us that all human beings (you, me, and others) are all capable, given the wrong/right circumstances, of committing great crimes and horrors. Genocides and human rights abuses are not committed by evil people, but by people, just like you and me, doing evil thinks to other human beings.

Playing the “us”/“them” game of stigmatising groups in society who we don’t like or blaming for all our problems. Or holding prejudicial or stereotyped views of such groups. We do this easily and almost automatically, without thought. We are easily seduced by the lies and misrepresentations of unprincipled politicians hungry for votes and power who tell us such groups are to blame. And what groups are in the frame in today’s world for such demonisation and hatred? Mexicans (in the US), Muslims, refugees, immigrants, migrants from the European Union, asylum-seekers, benefit scroungers... you can add your own favourites if you like as more are added on an almost daily basis as we split up into our own clans and comfortable zones of exclusion behind walls, borders and fences – physical structures - but possibly even more damaging divisions in our minds and thoughts. Us and them... it’s an easy game to play, but with disastrous consequences.
Inflicting harm on “others”, especially those who are stigmatised: being blind to their suffering or actively creating the conditions in which harm is done: harassment and hate crimes; our indifference or even hostility to hundreds of thousands of refugees, some of whom are dying in the Mediterranean or freezing to death in Serbia or Greece, or living in dire conditions in concentrations camps at the borders of Hungary; our indifference to disabled people who are dying or committing suicide because of the dehumanising nature of our benefit system; physical attacks on Polish people, or Muslims, or indeed anyone who stands up for minorities and the vulnerable – such as MP Jo Cox.
But I hear you say: “we wouldn’t do that, we wouldn’t do harm to others”. But what would you do I ask?

How would I have behaved?

· Ivor Perl asks us to reflect on our own actions or inactions. Do we/you stand by and watch, or do you say “no, this is wrong, it must stop!”? Do you actively get involved in challenging prejudice and injustices? Would you stand up or would you remain silent?

Ivor asked ‘how would I have behaved if I had been the gentile (the person who was not Jewish)?’ We can also ask ourselves ‘what would I have done if I had seen my neighbours forced out of their homes and onto trains or into ghettoes simply for who they were? Would I have stood by? Or would I have spoken out?’ The Holocaust was allowed to happen because the people with the power and the knowledge to stop it stood by and did nothing.

So in the contemporary world we need to ask: what am I doing?

Elie Wiesel

At the end of Ivor’s film he says ‘the only thing we can do is not answer hate with hate.’ Perhaps we can challenge ourselves to go even further.

As Elie Wiesel, another Holocaust survivor, wrote:

‘I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.’

Don’t stand by

With the words of Ivor Perl and Elie Wiesel in mind, with our understanding of human psychology in mind, I would ask you today to commit to not standing by.

When we see acts of injustice, don’t stand by. When we hear of intolerance, don’t stand by. When we see people being picked on because of who they are, don’t stand by. And when we see others act on their hatred, don’t stand by. And, if and when we see others “not standing by” and challenging, support them too – especially if we don’t have the courage to do it ourselves.

If we can all make the commitment today that we will not stand by when others face prejudice, perhaps we can help the world learn lessons from the past to create a better, safer future.

HMD 2017 Film

I would like to finish with another short film that has been produced for HMD 2017. It challenges us to think about how we can support those who face hostility today and create a safer society together.

http://hmd.org.uk/news/we-launch-our-film-hmd-2017

Call Mr. Robeson comes to Wellingborough

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:24:00 +0000

Black History Month 2016 and Hate Crime Awareness Week

Wellingborough Afro-Caribbean Association (WACA)

presents in conjuction with

Northamptonshire Rights and Equality Council (NREC), UNISON, UNITE–the union, National Union of Teacher, Independent Socialists in Wellingborough (ISW), The Big Lottery

Paul Robeson is a world-famous actor, singer and civil rights campaigner. When he gets too radical and outspoken for the establishment's liking, he is branded a traitor to his country, is harassed, and denied opportunities to perform or travel.

This roller-coaster journey through Robeson’s remarkable life highlights how his pioneering and heroic political activism led many to describe him as the forerunner of the civil rights movement. It features some famous songs (including a dramatic rendition of Ol’ Man River), speeches, and a spectacularly defiant testimony to the US Senate House Un-American Activities Committee in the 1950s.

Friday October 14th 2016

7.30pm

FREE Caribbean buffet food from 6.00pm

Rock Street Centre Rock Street

Wellingborough NN8 4LW

Tickets:

£6.00 in advance (see below)

£8.00 on the door

Disabled access BSL Signers for the deaf

Advanced bookings: https://callmrrobeson.eventbrite.co.uk

Or tickets can be purchased from WACA and

NREC (cash or cheque – payable to WACA)

Further info: telephone Paul 07872836463

or iswwellingborough@gmail.com

SOLIDARITY: A new range of luxury products supporting the people of Greece

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Thu, 03 Dec 2015 11:51:00 +0000

“A new range of luxury products supporting

progressive politics internationally”

“Solidarity not aid or charity”

Superior quality soap from Greece. Hand made using olive,

coconut, palm and almond oil in five natural fragrances:

Lily, Blackberry, Ocean, Lavender and Vanilla

Produced by the

Galatsi Movement of Resistance and Solidarity

“Movement for the Unemployed”

£3.00 per bar

or all five fragrances for £12.00

+ postage and packaging

100% of profits go directly to the Movement of Resistance and Solidarity

“Movement of the Unemployed ” Perno Ampariza, Galatsi, Athens

To order or make inquiries email:

iswwellingborough@gmail.com

or telephone 07872836463

*****

Privately educated children earn more than state-educated children with the same grades

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:44:00 +0000

To download the full pdf click here

Explaining the data

The figures on earnings for privately-educated children were calculated by the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank and can be viewed here -http://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/pr/graduate_earnings_301014.pdf

Visit Inequality Briefing

*******

There are more disadvantaged children in Britain than in many other advanced economies

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:07:00 +0000

A higher proportion of UK children grow up in households with incomes well below the national median, while more young people in the UK are not in education, employment or training

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data

These figures are taken from the UNICEF Innocenti Report Card, an annual comparison of living standards for children and young people in advanced economies. The figures are from 2012 (child poverty) and 2013 (young people not in education, training or employment) because these are the figures used in the most recent version of the report. You can read the full report here:http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/rc12-eng-web.pdf

*****

Top Universities are dominated by students who went to private school: Barely half of entrants to Oxford University are state educated, compared to 93% of the wider population

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:42:00 +0000

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data

These figures were taken from the Higher Education Statistics Agency. You can see the full results at https://www.hesa.ac.uk/pis/urg

Visit Inequality Briefing

********

There are more low-paid workers in the UK than in other advanced economies

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:14:00 +0000

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data

This data is taken from the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development database via http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DatasetCode=AV_AN_WAGE. Figures are for 2012 and 2013, and are the most recent available for each country. More detailed figures on UK employment are available from the Office for National Statistics ‘jobs statistics’ at http://ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/index.html?nscl=Job+Statistics#tab-data-tables

Visit Inequality Briefing

*********

The richest 10% of the population get richer whilst incomes for the poorest 10% plummet

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Wed, 20 May 2015 08:58:00 +0000

To download the pdf, click here

Explaining the data

Explaining the data: These figures were calculated by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) as part of their ‘Real Britain Index’ - http://www.realbritainindex.org/. NEF calculated a more detailed inflation figure for each decile (group of 10%) of the UK population from richest to poorest, based on their spending habits (for example, the poorest decile spend a higher proportion of their income on food, so are hit harder by food price increases, but are less likely to be affected by changes in the cost of luxury goods). NEF then used these inflation figures to calculate the year-on-year change in the incomes of each decile. Since the data used in this infographic was published, inflation has fallen, giving hope that real incomes of poorer households will rise. But this will also depend on factors such as low pay and cuts to social security.

Visit Inequality Briefing

********

The 14 worst human rights myths

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Fri, 15 May 2015 10:34:00 +0000

THE 14 WORST HUMAN RIGHTS MYTHS

This myth-busting visualization will take news-making human rights stories and explain the reality behind the headline

**********

Top bosses pay increases are way out of proportion to company performance

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:06:00 +0000

Britain's top executives are supposed to be paid according to how their companies perform - but pay in recent years has increased far more quickly than performance.

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data

Explaining the data: This research was carried out for the High Pay Centre by Incomes Data Services. You can see the full report at www.highpaycentre.org

Visit Inequality Briefing

*********

The gap between the richest and poorest region in the UK is the biggest in Europe

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:48:00 +0000

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data

These figures are taken from data compiled by Eurostat, the data agency of the European Union. Although we have only shown figures for a selection of countries commonly compared with the UK in terms of equality and economic success, there is no other country in the whole of the EU where the richest region is nearly 5 times as rich as the poorest. The currency used by Eurostat is the ‘Purchasing Power Standard’, an economic measurement that accounts for differences in the value of different currencies, as well as the different costs in different areas. Full data is available fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tgs00005&plugin=1

Visit Inequality Briefing

********

Great wealth exists in the UK alongside unimaginable poverty

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:04:00 +0000

Since 2009 executive pay has soared and the number of billionaires has increased, while food bank use has rocketed and pay for ordinary workers has fallen

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data

The data on UK billionaires is taken from the Sunday Times rich list, which can be read on-line, for a subscription fee. The data on executive pay was compiled for the High Pay Centre by Incomes Data Services, who looked at pay for Directors of FTSE 350 companies, the 350 biggest companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. You can read the full report here. The Office for National Statisticsrecords figures for wages across the whole UK workforce. Both directors’ and workers’ pay has been adjusted for inflation. Finally, the number of people given at least 3 days worth of food by a Trussel Trust foodbank is taken from the Trust’s website.

Visit Inequality Briefing

*******

The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. What a surprise!

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:55:00 +0000

Between 2007 and 2013, cash benefits paid to the richest fifth of the population increased by 42%. For the poorest fifth, benefits fell by 5%

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data

Here we have relied on a dataset produced by the Office for National Statistics. This data tracks the effects of taxes and benefits on household income over time. The series runs from 1977 to 2013 and is available here (table 14a). These figures are produced based on the average amount of cash benefits, original income and gross income received by households across the income distribution. We have rounded figures to the nearest whole number for clarity, but for accuracy the bottom, middle and top income quintiles of the income distribution saw an average real-term change in their receipt of cash benefits by 4.6%, 3.3% and 41.6% respectively. Calculations are based on RPI deflation

Visit Inequality Briefing

********

From Race Equality Matters: Electing without Prejudice

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:55:00 +0000

ELECTING

WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Free speech

Hard facts

Real debate

Britain’s social fabric rests on a strong bedrock of democratic political discussion. The freedom to debate and argue the issues of the day, great and small, gives lasting strength to our elected institutions.

That bedrock is threatened by those who abuse open debate and stir up prejudice and fear. Such activities make individuals the targets of violence and abuse. They obscure the real issues at stake, sowing mistrust and misunderstanding instead of open, public debate in which all can take part. Such activities, and those who pursue them, should be rejected by all.

Every voter wants to know that an election campaign was a fair one, however hard and passionately it may have been fought. Every voter has the right to the facts upon which to base their decision on the rival solutions offered by different candidates. Every candidate has the right to have their proposals considered objectively. Everyone working for the public has the right to have their efforts judged on the basis of information that is as objective as possible, not on supposition.

All of us have a role to play in seeing that an election campaign gets to the heart of the issues. Candidates, political parties, local councils and other public bodies, voluntary, community, charitable and trade union organisations, can all contribute to an election campaign that gets to the heart of the issues and is conducted in a responsible manner.

Racism, racial hatred, prejudice and misunderstanding are serious dangers in Britain today. We call on all who have a role to play in ensuring that our elections are fair and truly free, to join us in supporting this call for an election campaign rid of the exploitation of prejudice.

To achieve

• vigorous debate during the coming election campaigns around the issues facing Britain today;

• full participation by all involved - candidates, electors and the wider public; and

• a secure and open atmosphere during election campaigns so that all electors feel able take part in debating the issues, challenging candidates and gaining a proper understanding of their different approaches and proposed solutions;

We call upon those

• putting themselves forward for election;

• seeking to take part in election debates; and

• public authorities responsible for ensuring that the rights of electors, of candidates and of the public in general are properly fulfilled;

To support the following principles:

Candidates standing for election should

• work for a welcoming Britain which values all its people, celebrates its diversity and provides equality of opportunity for all;

• commit that, if elected, they will seek to represent everyone, and not pitch one group against another for short-term political or personal gain;

• ensure they do not take actions or use words likely to generate prejudice or hostility between different groups.

Leaders of political parties involved in an election should

• guarantee that their party, its candidates and campaigners abide by the above principles and that where complaints are made of activities that may be likely to stir up prejudice, these will be properly investigated, with appropriate action taken and publicised, if the complaint is upheld.

Those responsible for electoral arrangements should

• join in actively encouraging the participation of electors in the electoral process.

Those responsible for public safety and security during election campaigns should

• ensure that all electors and candidates can take part in the campaign, and proceed to cast their votes, free of intimidation and fear.

Public bodies serving our communities should

• prepare for the controversies that surround elections and consider in advance how to challenge misperceptions in the local community relevant to that authority’s particular responsibilities, its own work or the impact of that work on people locally;

• refute any false or misleading information circulating in the area relevant to their responsibilities that could lead to racial hatred or damage relations between people from different racial groups. They should act on the basis of the objective information available to the authority.†

Voluntary, community, trade union and other interested bodies should

• enable voters to have access to objective information on issues that concern the organisation and those it serves. Voters have a right to be able to learn from the diverse experiences of different bodies, their members and those they serve, who in some cases may be the best, if not the only, source of such information.

Further advice on the law, elections and political campaigning

Detailed advice on different aspects of electoral law as it affects candidates, campaigners, interested bodies and public authorities can be obtained from the Electoral Commission at www.electoralcommission.org.uk.

The Charity Commission for England and Wales provides specific advice for registered charities.

www.charitycommission.gov.uk/detailed-guidance/managing-your-charity/speaking-out-guidance-on-campaigning-and-political-activity-by-charities-cc9/charities-and-elections/.

The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator does not offer guidance of its own. The advice is designed for registered charities but is applicable to other voluntary and related bodies.

† Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity

A Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity was issued by the Department for Communities and Local Government on 31 March 2011 and is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/5670/1878324.pdf

with an Explanatory Memorandum at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/5671/1840982.pdf.

The relevant paragraphs of the Code state:

16: Local authorities should not use public funds to mount publicity campaigns whose primary purpose is to persuade the public to hold a particular view on a question of policy. It is acceptable for local authority publicity to correct erroneous material which has been published by other parties, despite the fact that the material being corrected may have been published with the intention of influencing the public’s opinions about the policies of the authority. Such publicity should seek to explain the facts in an objective manner.

19: Where local authority publicity addresses matters of political controversy it should seek to present the different positions in relation to the issue in question in a fair manner.

31: Publicity by local authorities may seek to influence (in accordance with the relevant law and in a way which they consider positive) the attitudes of local people or public behaviour in relation to matters of health, safety, crime prevention, race relations, equality, diversity and community issues.

32: Local authorities should consider how any publicity they issue can contribute to the promotion of any duties applicable to them in relation to the elimination of discrimination, the advancement of equality and the fostering of good relations.

Does the code permit local authorities to publish factual material by way of correction or rebuttal of inaccurate statements that promote discrimination or harassment, or promote or constitute other unlawful acts during an election period?

Following a debate in the House of Lords on the Local Audit and Accountability Bill, Baroness Hanham made it clear in a Ministerial Statement on 15 July 2014 that local authorities may correct false information:

‘…[T]he publicity code explicitly provides for a local authority to correct or rebut misinformation, making explicit provision in the sections about objectivity and care during periods of heightened sensitivity. Moreover, it contains provisions about equality and diversity, specifically allowing local authority publicity to seek to influence the attitudes of local people or public behaviour in relation to matters including equality, diversity and community issues.

During an election period, for example, local authorities may publish factual material. A local authority should take care when issuing publicity and should not be issuing publicity that seeks to influence voters. However, this does not prevent an authority from fulfilling its role in seeking positively to influence people in terms of equality and diversity. Hence if there is disinformation in circulation promoting harassment, a local authority may take action to correct it at election time or indeed any other time…[Emphasis added]. Nothing in the publicity code prevents local authorities addressing issues of discrimination or harassment and tackling them head on.’

HL Deb 15 July 2013 col. 602 [Lords Chambers]

The Local Government Information Unit provides practical guidance for local authorities on the Publicity Code which is available at www.lgiu.org.uk.

The Public Sector Equality Duty

Guidance on the public sector equality duty (PSED) can be obtained from the Equality and Human Rights Commission at:

http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/advice-and-guidance/

Section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 imposes a duty on public authorities when exercising public functions to have due regard to the need to:

a) eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation and any other conduct that is prohibited by or under the Act

b) advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it

c) foster good relations between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it.

This duty applies to the protected characteristic of race (which includes colour, ethnic or national origins and nationality) as well as to sex, disability, sexual orientation, religion or belief, gender reassignment, age and pregnancy and maternity.

Section 149(3) explains that having due regard to the need to advance equality of opportunity involves having due regard, in particular, to the need to –

a) remove or minimise disadvantages suffered by people who share a relevant protected characteristic that are connected to that characteristic,

b) take steps to meet the needs of people who share a relevant protected characteristic that are different from the needs of people who do not share it,

c) encourage people who share a relevant protected characteristic to participate in public life or in any other activity in which participation by such people is disproportionately low.

Section 149(5) explains that having due regard to the need to foster good relations between persons who share a protected characteristic and persons who do not share it, involves having due regard, in particular, to the need to

a) tackle prejudice, and

b) promote understanding

Certain listed public authorities are also subject to additional specific duties relating to the publication of equality information and the setting of equality objectives, which are intended to enable the better performance of the s.149 duty.

Guidance in support of the PSED refers to participation in elections as included in the definition of "public life and other activities" in section 149(3)(c).

Produced by Race Equality Matters 2015

*****

Pay for top bosses is growing 5 times faster than for ordinary workers

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Sat, 07 Feb 2015 12:27:00 +0000

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data

This research was carried out for the High Pay Centre by Incomes Data Services. You can see the full report at http://highpaycentre.org/pubs/new-high-pay-centre-report-performance-related-pay-is-nothing-of-the-sort

*******

Poorer Children are already disadvantaged before they even start school. Differences in income hinder children's progress from a very young age

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:59:00 +0000

To download the full pdf click here

Explaining the data

Academics analysed a group of children at the age of 3 and 5, comparing their school readiness and their reading age. They compared the average score for each income group, ranging from the richest fifth to the poorest fifth, to the overall median. In each category, Children in the poorest fifth averaged a score that was well below the overall median, while the richest fifth were significantly above the median. So, for example, the average 3 year old born into the richest fifth of the population scored 63 (meaning a score higher than 63% of all children) for school readiness, while the average score in the poorest fifth was just 32. Obviously, the median for all 3 year olds was 50, below the richest, but above the poorest. This chart is taken from Professor John Hills’s book ‘Good Times, Bad Times: the welfare myth of them and us’ published by ‘Policy Press’ in November 2014.

Visit Inequality Briefing

*******

Wellingborough Diggers Festival 2015: Programme of events

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:06:00 +0000

Wellingborough Diggers Festival 2015: Programme of Events:

Saturday 28th February 2015 for one week: Display about the Wellingborough Diggers (Fringe - Free admission)
Venue: Wellingborough Museum, Castle Way, NN8 1XB. Open 10am-4:30pm daily

Friday 6th March 2015 (Fringe - Free event)
Talk by Andrew Bradstock (United Reform Church and The Social Justice Forum)
Venue: Friends Meeting House, St. Johns Street, Wellingborough, NN8 4LG
Time: 7:30pm
Theme: "Food banks, Hunger and History; What can we learn from the Wellingborough Diggers 1650?"
This discussion will be chaired by Martin Heath (BBC Radio Northampton)
No ticket required but please email Tony Banks at red@tonybanks.plus.com if you are interested as seats are limited.
Although this is a free event, we suggest a donation of £4 to help cover some of the costs. We would also like to use this opportunity to collect tins of food to be donated to the local food bank.

Saturday 7th March 2015 (Fringe - Free event)
Talk by Andrew Bradstock
Venue: Wellingborough Library, Pebble Lane, NN8 1AS
Time: 12noon- 1pm
Theme: "Gerrard Winstanley: The Man and His Ideas"
This discussion will be chaired by Ian Foreman (Wellingborough Diggers Committee Member)

Saturday 7th March 2015 (Fringe - Free event)
Discussion to commemorate International Women's Day
Venue: Wellingborough Library, Pebble Lane, NN8 1AS
Time: 2pm- 4pm
Theme: "Should Women have Human Rights?"
This discussion will be chaired by Deidre Eadey. Guest speakers Jess Anslow and Cllr. Andrea Watts.

Saturday 7th March 2015 (Fringe - Free event)
'Protest Song'- Song-writing Workshop with Phil Hare
Venue: The Horseshoe Inn, Sheep Street, Wellingborough, NN8 1BS
Time: 2pm - 3pm
You don't need to play an instrument to get involved! Please email me at jacquinortonpromote@gmail.com if you are interested in taking part.

Saturday 7th March 2015 (Fringe - Free event)
Live Music
Artist: Lexie Green and the Indigo Blue (4pm-6pm)
Artist: The Song Birds (8pm)
Artist: G-String (9:30pm-late)
Venue: The Horseshoe Inn, Sheep Street, Wellingborough, NN8 1BS

Saturday 7th March 2015 (Main Festival Event - Tickets)
Venue: The Georgian Suite, The Hind Hotel, Sheep Street, Wellingborough, NN8 1BY (please note due to the age and nature of the building there is no lift)
Time: 7:30pm - late
Music will be performed by:

Phil Hare - performing contemporary songs that reflect social/political change
Kev Buxton - our very own local Kontra Roots promoter and musician
Rapscallion our headliners for this year who are influenced by The Pogues, The Levellers and include the Diggers song in their repertoire!

There will be a second-hand book stall on the Friday and Saturday evening events. Feel free to have a browse and buy - all proceeds from sales will go towards the 6th festival and fringe.

Tickets for the evening event Saturday 7th March 2015:

General Tickets £10 (or £8 concessions).
Please send cheques payable to Wellingborough Diggers with ticket order details, contact telephone number and a stamped address envelope to:

Wellingborough Diggers
c/o 3 Grove Street
Wellingborough
Northants
NN8 3HW

**********

Wellingborough Diggers Festival 2015: Put it in your diary NOW!

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Sun, 04 Jan 2015 11:54:00 +0000

Visit the festival website at www.diggersfestival.org.uk

*******

Contrast and Compare: 1930s and 2014

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:00:00 +0000

******

The myth of social mobility in the UK: the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor

noreply@blogger.com (Paul Crofts) — Sun, 30 Nov 2014 17:33:00 +0000

To download a full pdf, click here

Explaining the data

This data is taken from a study by Miles Corak, Income inequality, equality of opportunity and intergenerational mobility, published in The Journal of Economic Perspectives, volume 27 number 3, pages 79-102

Visit Inequality Briefing

******