What The #@&%!!

The Best Babylon Bee Sketches Of 2021

2022-01-05T07:12:00.004-08:00

'Pelosi Is Hiding Evidence!' Louie Gohmert Says Jan. 6 Detainees Treated Inhumanely

2021-12-13T09:50:00.000-08:00

A recent press conference highlights only SOME of the terrible conditions being endured by the so-called "insurrectionists" of the 06 Jan 2021 events at the US Capitol.

NONE of the detainees have been charged with a crime, they are denied legal representation, are not allowed to see their families, and other egregious things that amount to illegal punishment and confinement by the Washington, D.C. jail.

Please watch, and just try to not be outraged by what you hear!

(Below is my response to this video)

If unarmed people--many of whom were actively waved in by Capitol Police officers--roaming the Halls of Congress (including a few who did a bit of destruction) amounted to an insurrection, what do you call four years of Democrat efforts to actively remove a duly elected President with lies, fabrications, distortions and TWO failed Impeachments? Personally, I'd call that an attempted coup; yet no one is being held responsible for all of the lies, the calls for violence on our streets etc, etc.

Nancy Pelosi is a tyrant parading as House Speaker, and she will do anything to destroy the Republican Party while simultaneously allowing Dems to do and say actual heinous things like antisemitism on the House floor, bailing out criminals who have robbed, looted, torched buildings and rioted across several cities, calls for violence against President Trump and his Administration, sleeping with Chinese spies, election fraud, election campaign fraud, insider trading...the list of Democrat misdeeds just goes on and on and on...without any repercussions.

"Decades Ahead Of Model Predictions" (More Climate Change Lies!)

2021-11-01T07:05:00.001-07:00

It's all about the $$$$$!

An Honest, Brutal Account of Biden's Presidency Thus Far

2021-10-14T16:56:00.001-07:00

From The National Review comes the singularly best, most brutally honest assessment of Joe Biden's short Presidency. Please read!

Joe Biden is a Threat to the Constitution

By CHARLES C. W. COOKE October 14, 2021

As president, Joe Biden is who he was as a candidate, and who he was as a vice president, and who he was as a U.S. senator before that. He’s a fraud.

President Biden is not good ol’ folksy Joe. He’s not a political moderate. He’s not a defender of the American system of government. He’s a chameleon, whose only loyalties are to himself, to his party, and to wherever the loudest voices on the American left happen to be at any given time. We are now nine months into Joe Biden’s presidency, and he has already revealed himself to represent a substantial threat to the Constitution. As it always has, National Review intends to fight that threat, and to win.

The fight is a broad one, for it seems that there is no long-cherished norm that President Biden will not abandon for temporary gain. Once upon a time, he was a staunch champion of the filibuster who described those who disagreed with him as being engaged in a “naked power grab” that would destroy “America’s sense of fair play.” Now, he is fine with destroying what he has dishonestly taken to calling a “relic of Jim Crow.” Once upon a time, he was against packing — read: destroying — the Supreme Court: “I remember this old adage about power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” Biden explained in 2005. “Corrupted by power, in my view, [FDR] unveiled his court-packing plan.” Now, he is so open to the idea that he has convened a presidential commission to study it. (Perhaps it’ll conclude that power doesn’t corrupt absolutely, after all?) Once upon a time, Biden insisted that he was for free speech and against “silencing” — even when it became raucous. Now, he has enlisted the attorney general in a disgraceful and unconstitutional attempt to chill the speech of American parents who aren’t thrilled at the prospect of their children being conscripted into Ibram X. Kendi’s army. National Review has stood strong against all of these threats, and, with your help, it will continue to do so.

Presidents often abuse their power. But, so confident is Joe Biden that the press will cover for him, this one isn’t even trying to hide it. In August, having confirmed repeatedly that he did not possess the legal authority to extend the federal eviction moratorium unilaterally, Biden not only decided to do it anyway, but announced that he was doing so in order to game the court system and “keep this going for a month — at least.” More recently, Biden has played the same game with his federal vaccine mandate. In July, both the White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, and the head of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky, echoed Joe Biden’s December insistence that there would be no federal rule. Vaccine mandates, Jen Psaki confirmed, are not “the role of the federal government,” but of “institutions, private-sector entities, and others.” “There will be no nationwide mandate,” Walensky assured reporters. “There will be no federal mandate.” In September, Biden announced such a mandate and told any governor who opposed it to “get out of the way.”

Well, I’m afraid that’s not how any of this works. Joe Biden is the temporary custodian of the Oval Office, and, contrary to the obsequious implications of many in the media, he is as obliged to honor his oath of office as is anybody else in public life. If he cannot do that, it is he, not the American order, who must “get out of the way.”

President John F Kennedy WARNING us all TODAY!

2021-10-11T07:50:00.000-07:00

A warning from the past that is all too evidently happening today with the unconstitutional edicts of the Biden Administration, and its role in the blossoming subversion of the United States from the Democrat Party itself.

'Comply, or else'; "It's for your safety!" and other such edicts or proclamations come only from tyrants and despots, and are wholly incompatible with liberty and freedom!

Just look around, pay attention, open your eyes to the internal destruction we are witnessing, the censorship, the purposeful division of our citizenry, the blatant attacks on the Bill of Rights, A President all too willing to ignore our immigration laws in favor of a tidal wave of illegal aliens storming our Southern border, attacks on the Supreme Court, the raging war against religion--specifically, Christianity, and so much more that has happened since Biden took Office just ten months ago.

Just pay attention, question what we are told, and ask yourself if this is liberty and freedom, or something infinitely terrible that is happening from our "leaders" in Washington, D.C..

Horrifying Details About Abortion and Fetal Harvesting

2021-10-02T13:07:00.000-07:00

I am warning anyone who reads this entry, that the information below will be extremely disturbing to many, horrifying to others, and unconscionable to all!

While grossly disturbing, I feel it is essential for this information to go out because the MSM, Bbig Tech and their Democrat allies and Dem voters will never cover this.

If you wish to proceed, please continue. If not, STOP HERE!

The following information was obtained by Governmental watchdog group, Judicial Watch, through Freedom of Information (FOIA) requests, as well as additional litigation when the stated requests were not fulfilled...

Judicial Watch has uncovered more documents detailing the evil activities of your federal government – the trafficking of the remains of unborn human beings killed by abortion.

We received another 198 pages of records and communications from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) involving “humanized mice” research with human fetal heads, organs and tissue, including communications and contracts with human fetal tissue provider Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR).

Most of the records are communications and related attachments between Perrin Larton, a procurement manager for ABR, and research veterinary medical officer Dr. Kristina Howard of the FDA.

We received the records through a March 2019 FOIA lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, of which the FDA is a part (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department Health and Human Services (No. 1:19-cv-00876)).

Our lawsuit asks for all contracts and related documentation on disbursement of funds, procedural documents and communications between FDA and ABR for the provision of human fetal tissue to be used in humanized mice research. After we successfully opposed the FDA’s redaction of certain information from its records, a federal court ordered HHS to release additional information about its purchases of organs harvested from aborted human fetuses – including “line item prices,” or the price per organ the government paid to ABR. The court also found “there is reason to question” whether the transactions violate federal law barring the sale of fetal organs. Documents previously uncovered in this lawsuit show that the federal government demanded the purchased fetal organs be “fresh and never frozen.”)

The records include an FDA generated contract with ABR, based on a “requisition” it issued on July 27, 2012, for $12,000 worth of “tissue procurement for humanized mice,” which indicates the requisition was for a “non-competitive award.” Although the initial award was for $12,000, the total estimated amount of funds allocated for the requisition was $60,000. Under “Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition,” the FDA writes:

Scientists within the FDA and in the larger field of humanized mouse research have searched extensively over the past several years, and ABR is the only company in the U.S. capable of supplying tissues suitable for HM research. No other company or organization is capable of fulfilling the need.

***

Costs are estimated [for the fetal parts] at $230 per tissue x two tissues per shipment = $460 plus $95 shipping = $555 per shipment. A total of 21 shipments = $11,655.00.

An April 1, 2013, “Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract” form that shows the FDA purchased fetal livers and thymuses from ABR going back to at least October 2012, billing $580 per liver/thymus set, but later paying a unit price of $685.

A January 1, 2013, “Fees for Services Schedule” provided by ABR to the FDA includes:

FETAL CADAVEROUS PROCUREMENT SERVICE FEE

2nd trimester D&E
[Dilation and Evacuation abortion]
(13-24 weeks) per specimen $275

1st trimester aspiration [abortion] (8-12 weeks) per specimen $515

Intact Calvarium [baby’s skull] (8-24 weeks)” per specimen $515

The fees for services schedule also includes “Special Processing/Preservation” of the fetal parts, such as “Tissue ‘Cleaning,’” “Snap freezing,” and “Passive freezing (Dry ice).”

In a September 9, 2014, “Order for Supplies or Services,” the FDA writes regarding a $9,900 order:

The Contractors shall ship 2nd Trimester thymus $325, 2nd Trimester liver $325. Overnight deliver $150 and EFT wire transfer fee $25, for a total per delivery of $825. Total of this contract not to exceed $9,900.00.

As the result of an August 21, 2015, “Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract,” ABR bumped up the price of baby livers and thymuses from $325 each to $340 each.

A “Tissue Acquisition Quote” sent by ABR to Howard on July 5, 2017, provided a quote of $5,440 each to provide 16 sets of second trimester (16-24 weeks) livers and 16 sets of second trimester (16-24 weeks) thymuses at $340 per “sample.” The request for the quote notes that “tissue known to be positive for HIV, HepA, HepB, HepC or chromosomal abnormalities are not acceptable.”

On June 28, 2017, a redacted FDA contract specialist sends Larton at ABR a request for a quote (RFQ) of pricing for human fetal tissue, aged “16-24 weeks,” including a “Statement of Needs”:

The HM [humanized mice] are created by surgical implantations of human tissue into mice that have multiple genetic mutations that block the development of the mouse immune system at a very early stage. The absence of the mouse immune system allows the human tissues to grow and develop into functional human tissues…. In order for the humanization to proceed correctly we need to obtain fetal tissue with a specific set of specialized characteristics.

A May 2018, report from a company named “LABS,” which was employed by ABR to test fetal parts and their mothers for hepatitis and HIV, notes in its “methodology description” that they are approved by the FDA “for living and cadaveric donor screening.”

The records include a recitation of requirements by the FDA for “Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer,” in which ABR must adhere to regulations relating to “Convict Labor” and “Child Labor-Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies.”

On September 24, 2018, the Trump FDA terminated its contract with ABR for human tissue purchases and began an audit of its acquisitions of baby body parts. The records include the FDA’s letter terminating the contract:

Based on the terms and conditions of the Purchase Order as awarded to Advanced Bioscience Resources, Inc. ("ABR") on July 27, 2018, the Government is not sufficiently assured that the human tissue provided to the Government to humanize the immune systems of mice will comply with the prohibitions set forth under 42 U.S.C. § 289g- 2. Furthermore, the Government has concerns with the sufficiency of the sole-source justification. Therefore, pursuant to FAR [Federal Acquisition Regulation] clause 52.213-4(f), the Purchase Order is being terminated effective September 24, 2018.

Here’s some background.

In February 2020, we first uncovered through this lawsuit hundreds of pages of records from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) showing that the agency paid thousands of dollars to a California-based firm to purchase organs from aborted human fetuses to create “humanized mice” for HIV research.

In May 2021, this lawsuit uncovered FDA records showing the agency spent tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars to buy human fetal tissue from ABR. The tissue was used in creating “humanized mice” to test “biologic drug products.” The records indicated the FDA wanted tissue purchases “Fresh; shipped on wet ice.”

On August 3, 2021, we announced that The Center for Medical Progress (CMP) and Judicial Watch, through a separate lawsuit, received 252 pages of new documents from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that reveal nearly $3 million in federal funds were spent on the University of Pittsburgh’s quest to become a “Tissue Hub” for human fetal tissue ranging from 6 to 42 weeks’ gestation. The Pitt scientists note that, “All fetal tissue is collected through a collaborative process including Family Planning, Obstetrics and Pathology.” Pitt anticipated “being able to harvest and distribute quality tissue and cells … [and] do not anticipate any major problems related to the acquisition and distribution of the tissues.” Pitt’s target goal “is to have available a minimum of 5 cases (tissues and if possible other biologicals) per week of gestational age for ages 6-42 weeks.”

Chopping up aborted human beings for their organs and tissue is a moral and legal outrage. This issue should be front and center in any debate about America’s barbaric abortion industry.

Achmed thanks… uh… “interviews”, President Joe Biden | JEFF DUNHAM

2021-09-24T07:29:00.004-07:00

This is the best interview with Biden and Fauci I have ever seen!

Debunking the 1619 Project: What the Founding Fathers Actually Said About Slavery

2021-09-17T14:57:00.003-07:00

From non-profit Hillsdale College comes an honest and forthright examination (in brief) of the views our Founding Fathers had regarding slavery. This REAL history debunks the claims made by the fabrications and lies of the race-baiting 1619 Project. Please watch!

For other videos from Hillsdale College, you can visit their website directly, or find them on YouTube.

It Makes No Sense!

2021-09-16T12:54:00.002-07:00

The messaging coming out of the White House makes no sense whatsoever!

First off, Biden did NOT have any plan to combat the pandemic. That much was obvious when his pre-election team told reporters that they'd have to wait until after Biden was elected in order to know the plan. And guess what...No Plan!

Then, Biden returns fired Doctor Fauci to the WH Advisory Board. This was always a confusing choice because President Trump fired Fauci for a reason; so why was Biden reinstating him?

When the vaccine was finally available for mass inoculations, I had to wait and hear the recommendation from my Transplant Team as to whether or not I'd need to take it. After my wife received her vaccine, it was my turn. I had my first injection of the Transplant Team recommended Pfizer vaccine in mid-May. The side effects for me lasted about two weeks, and included fever, specifically centered headaches, fuzzy vision, extreme lethargy and a very poor appetite.

My second dosage was given on 15 June. The worst side effects from this lasted over three weeks, and to this day--three months later, I STILL have one or two side effects that happen every day, and at differing times. They can stop at any time! I am seriously considering NOT getting a booster because of the severity of the side effects, as well as the lingering of them, too. Because frankly, this is ridiculous.

Anyhow, as a transplant patient, I had no choice but to get the vaccine (as well as my entire family), because if I get the Wuhan Virus, it will kill me because of my repressed immune system that is inherent with any transplant.

Had I been healthy, there is no way I would get the vaccine because my natural immune system was incredible. I got a cold about every three years, and the flu about every twelve years. A lifetime of exercise--up until my kidney issues--certainly bolstered my immunity to many things.

So, on to the point of this blog entry.

At first were were encouraged to hunker down in place for two weeks in order to "Slow the Spread, or Flatten the Curve." That made sense.

Then we were told to wear masks in public, and to social distance. For me this was no big deal as I have essentially been doing this ever since my transplant in 2017. For everyone else, it was a pain in the butt. Unfortunately, excepting the continued CDC droning messages, we would later find out that neither masking nor social distancing were at all effective methods of protecting ourselves.

During the Presidential Election cycle, every Democrat politician stated that no one could make you take a vaccine if you chose not to. But once Biden was Inaugurated, these same politicians began telling US citizens that they needed to take the vaccine; and are now demanding that all Americans get it.

Next, we find out that the Wuhan Virus--its proper name since that is where it originated--was likely a manufactured virus, which means that nothing is certain as manufactured viruses have a tendency to not follow the natural progression of mutations. Additionally, we just found out that, despite his numerous and incensed vehement denials in front of Congress, Dr. Fauci DID IN FACT help fund the research that developed this virus.

Next, the MSM began labeling Americans who did not want the vaccine as terrorists, hateful, anti-science, anti-life, selfish, blah, blah, blah.

Soon after, our Democrat politicians began using the same terms for those who choose not to inject themselves with the vaccine. They pressured schools, cities, parks and other entities to separate students and people between vaccinated and unvaccinated. Social media vitriol became hateful and tense against the unvaccinated, and remains so to this day.

Then, the White House admitted that, while trying to force the vaccine on Americans, it is releasing the hordes of illegal aliens storming across our Southern border without being sure they are tested or vaccinated...and without explanation of any sort!

Now, President Biden is attempting to force companies with 100+ employees to require vaccinations, or force employees to do at least one weekly virus testing. Plus, now we are being told that we must continue to social distance--despite the actual science--and wear masks to protect the vaccinated from the unvaccinated.

Did you catch that?

Those of us who are vaccinated must wear a mask to protect us from those who are not!

WHAT?

That makes no sense whatsoever!!!

If we have taken the vaccine, then we are immune from the most serious effects of the Wuhan Virus. WHY should we still need protection from the unvaccinated? How could we possibly still be in danger from a virus that we now have immunity against?

Again, this makes no sense whatsoever!

This has all the appearances of an exercise in control, with our "leaders" in DC being unaccountable for their illegal, unethical mandates and actions.

I don't know how many different news sources you personally utilize, but, thanks to the internet, I gather information from news sources across the globe in order to get the best picture of events, issues and other things of great import.

I've read and heard numerous reports that China is pressuring governments across the globe to use the pandemic as a human petrie dish, of sorts, in order to conduct a massive experiment of human control in order to create a possible single entity of government that is controlled by China, which will also replace the US Dollar as the predominant world wide business currency. This pressure comes from the fact that China has bought much of the world-wide government debt (the US included), and uses the threat of immediate demanded repayment, AND international trade pressure, to help them in their quest to dominate the world.

Now, I'm not saying that this is all fact; but when enough free sources corroborate the same basic information, you know there is at least some credibility to the allegations. How much of it is in fact credible, I don't know. But it is no secret that Chinese Premier Xi is hell-bent on world domination, and he needs Western Powers, and especially the United States, to get out of his way.

We also know that President Biden is morally and ethically compromised via his pay-for-play scheme that is enacted by his son, Hunter. We also know that Biden has personally met with high-ranking Chinese officials before he was elected President.

We know that, despite the MSM and Democrat claims, there are still serious questions regarding the 2020 Election. When Biden stated, "We have the largest election fraud organization in history" during the campaign, his staffers quickly put out a press releasing stating that Biden simply misspoke. However, knowing Biden's serious cognitive decline, you have to wonder if this was indeed a mere misstatement, or the truth leaking out during a lapse of cognitive control.

I am not a conspiracy nut by any stretch. I am simply trying to connect the dots. And I freely admit that I may be way, way off base. But the patterns that we see in hindsight, as well as those that are emerging raise serious questions that are not being answered because the MSM and Big Tech are working hard to suppress truth and free speech.

Again, WHY would we be required to continue to wear masks if we are vaccinated? How could the unvaccinated possible be a danger to the rest of us?

And please don't say, "The Delta variant," because every disease has mutations that might or might not be controlled. That does not mean that we live in fear. We can live cautiously...but not in fear.

Unfortunately, the President, Democratic politicians, the MSM and Big Tech all seem intent on keeping us afraid.

WHY?

Let's hope we figure that out before the United States is set on an irreversible course towards self-destruction.

More on the Latest of the Climate Change Fraud: Erasing The Dust Bowl

2021-09-11T06:47:00.000-07:00

What Was Left in Afghanistan is Far Worse Than We Are Being Told

2021-09-10T16:14:00.001-07:00

Reporter Lara Logan gives a chilling account of the military equipment that the Biden Administration abandoned--on purpose--in Afghanistan (along with US citizens and close Afghani allies). It is far from the quaint picture that Jen Psaki and the Pentagon are telling us.

Please watch this mind-blowing segment and then decide for yourselves what it all means.

Democrats Use Bigoted Attacks Against California Gubernatorial Candidate Larry Elder

2021-09-09T07:56:00.000-07:00

I looks like the Democrats have turned against the very things they claim to oppose: Racism, Bigotry and Hatred.

Why do I say this? Because in the California Gubernatorial Recall Election that is happening now, incumbent Gavin Newsome is up for recall because of his disastrous handling of the pandemic and the crushing effects his authoritarian policies have had on the State economy, education and populace. Plus, his open hypocrisy on numerous issues that are well documented has Californians livid.

So, enter Conservative talk show host Larry Elder, a man born and raised in South Central Los Angeles who has risen above his birth circumstances, became educated and successful in business. Now, Elder wants to be Governor, and the Democrats hate him for it.

From the Washington Examiner, an admittedly Conservative leaning publication, comes the following article regarding the recent attacks on Elder by the Democratic Party who are desperate to keep Newsome (and his disastrously failed policies) in Office.

No matter you political affiliation, the facts that this article present are eye-opening, and should alarm every American, even if you are not from California.

Please read...

Democrats Unleash Bigoted Attack on Larry Elder

(by Christopher Tremoglie)

"The "Sage from South Central" is running for governor of California, and liberal Democrats everywhere are nervous that he could win.

Elder is polling well and could pull off an upset to unseat Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom. So, Democrats are unleashing a plethora of bigoted rhetoric they would otherwise denounce themselves. We have reached the point that Democrats claim that voting for a wealthy, white, male for governor over a black man from South Central is fighting white supremacy. As per usual, Democrats claim a Republican candidate is inferior by focusing on the color of his skin.

It started with the article “Larry Elder is the Black face of white supremacy” in the Los Angeles Times. Then, it continued with the bastion of racial equality Joy Reid maniacally calling Elder, a black man, a white supremacist. On Labor Day, at a rally for Newsom hosted by the African American Voter Registration, Education, and Participation Project, the latest verbal bigoted tirade against Elder occurred. With Newsom in attendance, California state Sen. Sydney Kamlager accused Elder of being racist toward black people.

“Racism comes in all shapes and sizes, and we’re not stupid,” Kamlager said.

Melina Abdullah, a Marxist who is a professor at California State University, Los Angeles, also labeled Elder as a racist.

“She didn’t say his name, but I will: Larry Elder is a black face on white supremacy,” Abdullah said.

Attacks on skin color are what Democrats claim to be against. They claim to hate such racism, yet they very quickly weaponize it when they think it will benefit them. No one should be surprised by these attacks. It is what Democrats routinely did in similar attacks against Candace Owens, Stacey Dash, Republican Sen. Tim Scott, and Justice Clarence Thomas over the years. Blacks are marginalized victims of a white supremacist American society — unless they disagree with the Democrats' ideology. Then, they are considered racists too.

Democrats realize that challenging a candidate’s policy will not work because it often will reveal how their own policies are disastrous failures. So, they resort to attacking candidates based on their skin color. It used to be that this was only done to white politicians. However, Democrats have "progressed" to the point where now African Americans can be white supremacists.

The Democrats that use these tactics are as bigoted, perhaps even more so, than the people they claim to denounce. However, it is the 21st century, and their despicable hypocrisy must be called out. This is no path to racial equality. This is fearmongering. This is pandering. This is everything Democrats claim to be against yet weaponize when they find it convenient.

Democrats claim to strive for racial diversity, yet in reality, such diversity is actually their biggest fear. They oppose differing opinions. They chastise opposing thoughts. They abhor the diversity of thought while clamoring for a diversity of races.

Suffice to say, Larry Elder is not a racist. He is not a white supremacist either. He is a black Republican that is offering solutions to California’s many problems. Advocating school choice, promoting self-reliance and less dependence on government, opposing radical environmentalism, and getting criminals off the street are not the ideas of white supremacists. They’re the ideas of a compassionate person who wants to save his state. If his ideas were so awful, they would be easy to refute. However, the bigoted attacks deployed by Democrats are used to distract from their own failures.

Elder’s solutions help all Californians. His solutions are being offered as a result of the failures of a state with a Democratic governor and a supermajority in the California State Legislature. Elder’s solutions are designed to reverse Democratic policies that have resulted in the state’s first yearly loss in population. His solutions offer remedies for the state’s exodus by companies. His solutions offer strategies to reverse the state’s housing affordability crisis. His platform offers ideas to combat the COVID-19 pandemic without closing schools, lockdowns, and incessant mask-wearing. None of these are ideas predicated on race. They are ideas developed from rational thought and designed to help all Californians.

With less than a week until the California recall election, expect the bigoted attacks against a black candidate to continue. Democrats are petrified at the possibility of Elder becoming the first black governor in California’s history. And as Democrats have shown, this fear has everything to do with the color of his skin."

Debunking the 1619 project - Is America Racist? David Barton teaches on the Truth about America

2021-08-18T07:57:00.000-07:00

If you don't believe the [false] narrative of the destructive 1619 Project, and its aim to destroy "the American Myth," then you MUST watch this incredible video from The WallBuilders, an organization dedicated to teaching the truth about US history. This video debunks the premise of the 1619 Project, so please watch it in its entirety.

Ted Cruz's Scathing Rebuke of Democrats, Nancy Pelosi and the CDC on the Senate Floor

2021-08-11T07:49:00.001-07:00

Greenpeace Co-Founder Exposed The Fraud Called "Climate Change"

2021-08-02T15:33:00.002-07:00

From the Epoch Times comes a story that the MSM will NEVER tell its viewers; but, which is vital to know nonetheless. Please read and form your own opinion...

"Climate Scare Story Began With Far Left

Ideology: Greenpeace Co-Founder"

Patrick Moore talks about why he left Greenpeace and why the the push for net-zero emissions is an unattainable goal

BY ISAAC TEO

July 27, 2021 Updated: July 27, 2021

Patrick Moore was only 24 when he co-founded Greenpeace in the early 1970s. He soon became the driving force behind the environmental activist group’s many influential campaigns, such as to stop nuclear testing, protect endangered whales, and prevent toxic dumping.

“It began in 1971 with the first voyage to stop U.S. hydrogen bomb testing in Alaska, which we did,” Moore told The Epoch Times. “And then we went after France’s atmospheric nuclear testing in the South Pacific.”

Greenpeace would go on to launch its “Save the Whales” campaign in 1975, followed in 1976 by a campaign to end the killing of baby seals for their fur, and later that decade a campaign to end toxic dumping in rivers by factories in Europe.

But as Greenpeace gained influence, Moore says he started to see it getting hijacked by what he characterizes as people with political ideology from the left.

“None of us in the original group was there to make money. We were all volunteers,” he said. “But the ultra-leftists took over my organization when they realized there was a lot of money and power to be had there.”

He said it was during the “Save The Whales” campaign that people started donating money to Greenpeace in larger numbers, and that was when the group started getting a bank account and renting an office.

“So as time went on into the late 1970s, Greenpeace turned into a kind of business,” he said. “Pretty soon it actually became a business where fundraising started to become more and more important.”

By the time Moore left in 1986 after being with the organization for 15 years, “fundraising had now become the most important priority, and they would go ahead with a campaign for which there was no scientific basis,” he said.

He left Greenpeace due to “philosophical and political” reasons, he said, after having served as director, president, and international director.

“Greenpeace had started out with a strong humanitarian orientation, as well as a belief in saving the environment,” he said. “‘Green’ is for the environment, ‘peace’ is for the people not to be killed by nuclear war, among other things, or pollution.”

Over time, “peace” was gradually dropped, and Greenpeace, along with the rest of the environmental movement, drifted into a belief that sees the “human species as the enemy of nature, the enemy of the Earth,” Moore said.

The Epoch Times asked Greenpeace for an interview but didn’t hear back.

Emphasis on Fundraising Over Science

In the mid 1980s, Moore, who has a PhD in ecology, says he found himself the only director with a formal science education on Greenpeace’s international board, and the only director disagreeing with what the rest would propose next.

“They all agreed that the next campaign for Greenpeace should be to ‘ban chlorine worldwide.’ … They named chlorine ‘the devil’s element,’” he said.

Moore says he pointed out to the board that chlorine is one of the building blocks of the Earth, and of utmost importance for public health, as chlorine added to “drinking water, swimming pools, and spas has ended waterborne communicable diseases like cholera.”

He also said chlorine is critical for medicine because 25 percent of medicines contain chlorine, and chlorine chemistry is essential in the making of some 85 percent of medicines.

Greenpeace International proceeded to launch the campaign nonetheless, the reason being “largely based on fundraising,” according to Moore, and so he decided it was time to go.

Moore believes this is where scare stories of impending catastrophes and doom started. “It begins with the politicians and their bureaucrats funding the scientists who can be trusted to give them a good scare story.”

The Importance of Carbon Dioxide

When it comes to climate change, the continued narrative of carbon dioxide being a “bad thing” and “destroying the world” is contrary to what the scientific community has found, Moore says.

Moore currently serves as a director of the CO2 Coalition, established in 2015 to create educational material on the importance of carbon dioxide. The organization has published papers presenting scientific data to dispute that CO2 emissions are causing global warming.

Contrary to what climate alarmists claim, Moore says, “carbon dioxide is the basis of all life on Earth.”

“It makes the oceans less alkaline, thus making it suitable for life,” and “on land, CO2 makes the greening of the Earth plus it makes plants more efficient with water.”

In April 2016, an article published in Nature funded in part by NASA found that CO2 fertilization has had significant impact on the greening of the planet.

“From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide,” reads a post on NASA’s site on the study.

“Studies have shown that increased concentrations of carbon dioxide increase photosynthesis, spurring plant growth,” the article added.

Net-Zero a ‘Political Goal’

Moore said the push for net-zero carbon emissions by governments around the world is “purely a political slogan.”

“I’m not sure how they could reduce CO2 emissions if they didn’t stop using fossil fuels virtually altogether,” he said, questioning how the transportation, agriculture, mining, and forestry sectors could function without them.

“I believe this is an unattainable political goal for society. And I also believe it is a goal that will bring greater hardship than people have endured since the great wars, since the great disease epidemics of the past.”

Moore said there is a powerful convergence of interests among key elites in Western society pushing environmental scare stories.

“It puts [politicians] in the media, and the media makes much money from the sensationalism, and the activists then raise money,” he said.

Hollywood plays a big part as celebrities join to endorse the climate change narrative, he added, as well as many scientists.

“Nearly all the money going to the scientists who are writing these things is public money, so it all has to be approved by politicians, and bureaucrats working for the politicians,” he said, adding that scientists who utter anything to the contrary get cancelled.

In his latest book, “Fake Invisible Catastrophes and Threats of Doom,” Moore talks about how the hyped up environmental catastrophes and threats create fear.

“There’s so much propaganda and so many lies, but the unified theory of scare stories is what I call these, because they have something in common—they are all based on things that are invisible or so remote that the average citizen cannot observe what these people are seeing, and cannot verify what these people are saying.”

Fight Against CRT in Pennbury, PA School District

2021-07-07T07:26:00.005-07:00

The two videos below highlight both the dictatorial stance from the Pennbury School Board, and its attitude towards parents who oppose their district teaching Critical Race Theory to their children; as well as a perfect response from an ex-pat Brit who is fed up with this divisive garbage being promoted by Leftist Democrats, which to be honest, seemingly includes ALL Democratic politicians these days.

Parents, you must fight for your children if your local school board is pushing Critical Race Theory! If you don't, your children will receive "education" that pushes racism, shame for your skin color, community divisiveness, and other harmful ideas that innocent children will accept as fact.

Educate yourselves, and DEMAND that CRT never be taught in your local schools!

Never settle for something so awful being taught to any child in the United States of America!

1) School Board shuts down public comments they don't like.

2) A terrific, knowledgeable, slam dunk response.

Damaging, Dangerous Critical Race Theory in Massachusetts Schools

2021-06-28T16:39:00.000-07:00

From Government Watchdog Judicial Watch comes disturbing, disgusting and flat out racist teachings happening in Massachusetts schools; and possibly in YOUR State, as well.

Parents, please educate yourselves about this horrifically dangerous, divisive and racist garbage being foisted on our children around the Country; and especially in Democrat-controlled States! Often, the Governors of the Democrat States ordered this institutional racism by Executive Actions, with no public input or even Legislative debate from their individual States!

The way you fight this un-American, un-Constitutional horror show is by fighting back at the community level. Go to School Board Meetings and express your concerns about Critical Race Theory; organize community opposition; write a/o call your elected State and National Representatives/Senators and DEMAND that CRT is removed from our schools, and kept away from our children! If you live where CRT is being discussed for adoption in your schools, speak up, speak out and work to keep CRT away from your schools!

Anyhow, please read this disturbing, eye-opening hatred being taught to young, impressionable minds across the Country. Thank you!

*If you want to learn more, go to Judicial watch.com.

"One by one, school districts across the country are being overcome by a racist madness, and we are doing everything we can to expose this leftist totalitarian assault on children and teachers. The latest horror story occurs in Massachusetts.

We received 111 pages of records from Wellesley Public Schools in Massachusetts which confirm the use of “affinity spaces” that divide students and staff based on race as a priority and objective of the school district’s “diversity, equity and inclusion” plan. The school district also admitted that between September 1, 2020 and May 17, 2021, it created “five distinct” segregated spaces.

We obtained the records after filing a May 17 Massachusetts Public Records Law request for records concerning the number of affinity spaces, the policies regarding their creation and use, the topics discussed, and any analysis of whether affinity spaces that exclude certain races are consistent with state and federal law, which would include the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the MA Equal Rights Amendment and/or the MA School Attendance Law.

The Wellesley Public School records include a document detailing the school district’s “Equity Strategic Plan 2020-2025,” which includes a “District Equity by Design” plan with the stated goal of amplifying student voices by providing “opportunities for affinity spaces for students with shared identity.”

In a section of the document titled “Diversity Staffing,” a stated goal is to “Provide resources for affinity spaces for specialized populations within the wider Faculty/Staff (ie. ALANA, Admin Leaders of Color, LGBTQ+, White Educators for Antiracism, etc.)”

Wellesley Public Schools states in its plan for “Diversity, Equity & Inclusion:” “We will practice risk-taking and challenge one another to continuously examine systems of privilege and bias, and work collectively to disrupt and dismantle inequity in all its forms.”

In an email on March 18 to Director of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Charmie R. Curry, the day of the so-called “healing space,” a Wellesley High School fitness & health teacher writes: “I wanted to check first, is it appropriate for me to go to this healing space?” Curry responds: “This time, we want to hold the space for Asian and Asian American students and faculty/staff. I hope this makes sense.”

In an April 12 email to school district colleagues, Curry notes that “Equity Literacy” is required coursework in the district. Curry writes: “There is still plenty of time to enroll in the two required courses – ‘Understanding Equity and Inequity’ and ‘Learning to Be a Threat to Inequity.’ These courses, with a keen focus on helping us to build/sharpen our structural ideological lenses, are essential to our ability to address inequities in our community. Our students who are being impacted by inequities such as racism, homophobia, ableism, etc. need to be equipped to respond today to their needs in order to positively impact their experiences.”

In addition, the school district admitted that it does not have any records analyzing whether such segregated spaces violate the U.S. Constitution, the Massachusetts Constitution or any other law.

These documents confirm how Wellesley Public Schools segregated students and staff by race in pursuit of extremist critical race theory agenda.

Wellesley marks the latest battle in our fight to expose the hard-left “Critical Race Theory” agenda being pushed nationwide.

In May, we obtained records from Maryland’s Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) which include documents related to their “Anti-racist system audit” and critical race theory classes.

The documents reveal that students of “Maryland’s Largest School District” who attended Thomas Pyle Middle School’s social justice class were taught that the phrase “Make America Great Again” was an example of “covert white supremacy.” The phrase is ranked on a pyramid just below “lynching,” “hate crimes,” “the N-word” and “racial slurs.” They were also taught that “white privilege” means being favored by school authorities and having a positive relationship with the police.

The documents show that Montgomery County Public Schools allocated over $454,000 for an “Anti-racist system audit” by The Mid-Atlantic Equity Consortium, a company that claims that their “expertise in using intersectionality as part of its theory of change makes us uniquely positioned to conduct the Anti-Racist Audit and mitigate the root causes of systemic barriers.”

In February, we filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of David Flynn, the father of two Dedham Public School students, who was removed from his position as head football coach after exercising his right as a citizen to raise concerns about his daughter’s seventh-grade history class curriculum being changed to include biased coursework on politics, race, gender equality, and diversity. You can watch our video presentation on the Flynn case here.

This is work is significant but more is coming. Our children are under assault. Our military is being targeted. Our tax dollars are being abused and our rights are being attacked as the left pursues their radical agenda. Judicial Watch has been exposing and litigating over critical race theory and its progenitors for years – and our efforts will expand, with your support, to meet the increased threats to our Republic."

President Trump: A Plan to Get Divisive and Radical Theories Out of Our Schools

2021-06-21T22:01:00.000-07:00

A Plan to Get Divisive and

Radical Theories Out of Our Schools

By President Donald J Trump

18 June 2021

As a candidate, Joe Biden’s number one promise was to “unite” America. Yet in his first months as president, his number one priority has been to divide our country by race and gender at every turn.

There is no clearer example than the Biden administration’s new effort aimed at indoctrinating America’s schoolchildren with some of the most toxic and anti-American theories ever conceived. It is vital for Americans to understand what this initiative would do, what drives it and, most importantly, how we can stop it.

For decades, the America-blaming Left has been relentlessly pushing a vision of America that casts our history, culture, traditions, and founding documents in the most negative possible light. Yet in recent years, this deeply unnatural effort has progressed from telling children that their history is evil to telling Americans that they are evil.

In classrooms across the nation, students are being subjected to a new curriculum designed to brainwash them with the ridiculous left-wing dogma known as “critical race theory.” The key fact about this twisted doctrine is that it is completely antithetical to everything that normal Americans of any color would wish to teach their children.

Instead of helping young people discover that America is the greatest, most tolerant, and most generous nation in history, it teaches them that America is systemically evil and that the hearts of our people are full of hatred and malice. Far from advancing the beautiful dream of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.—that our children should “not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character”—the Left’s vile new theory preaches that judging people by the color of their skin is actually a good idea.

Teaching even one child these divisive messages would verge on psychological abuse. Indoctrinating generations of children with these extreme ideas is not just immoral—it is a program for national suicide. Yet that is exactly what the Biden administration endorsed recently in a rule published in the Federal Register aimed at inflicting a critical race theory-inspired curriculum on American schoolchildren.

The rule explicitly cites the New York Times’ discredited “1619 Project” as a motivation. The Times has described the goal of its endeavor as the “re-education” of the American people, and the project even includes a lesson plan that encourages students to practice “erasing” parts of the Declaration of Independence. The Biden rule also directly cites a left-wing activist and leading proponent of critical race theory whose textbook states, “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.”

This is what the Biden administration wants to teach America’s children.

The Department of Education rule stems from an executive order Biden signed on his first day in office. Biden’s order abolished the President’s Advisory 1776 Commission I created to honor America’s founding principles, and reversed an executive action I took to stop these depraved theories from being imposed upon federal employees in workforce training sessions.

Thankfully, most Americans oppose this insanity. The Left has only gotten away with it until this point because not enough parents have been paying attention and speaking up. But that is quickly changing. From Loudoun County, Va., to Cupertino, Calif., parents are beginning to make their voices heard against the left-wing cultural revolution. What they need now is a plan to actually stop it.

Here are the reforms that every concerned parent in America should be demanding.

First, every state legislature should pass a ban on taxpayer dollars going to any school district or workplace that teaches critical race theory, which inherently violates existing anti-discrimination laws. Inspired by my executive order last year, Florida, Texas, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and other states have already taken steps to pass such laws. It needs to happen everywhere—and Congress should seek to institute a federal ban through legislation as well.

Second, each state should create its own 1776 Commission to examine the public school curriculum and ensure that students are receiving a patriotic, pro-American education—not being taught that the United States is an evil nation.

Third, parents have a right to know exactly what is being taught to their children. Last year, many parents had the chance to routinely listen in on classes for the first time because of remote learning. As students return to the classroom, states need to pass laws requiring that all lesson plans have to be made available to parents—every handout, article, and reading should be posted on an online portal that allows parents to see what their kids are being taught. Furthermore, in many places, there are rules preventing students from recording what teachers say in class. States and school boards should establish a “Right to Record.”

Fourth, parents need to organize locally—in every school district in America—to eliminate “Action Civics” and other versions of the effort to contort traditional civics education into a vehicle for political indoctrination. The Left’s new argument is that our “divisions” stem from a lack of “civics education”—a problem they intend to “fix” with lots of new taxpayer money and a redefinition of “civics” in schools, just as they are trying to redefine the meaning of “infrastructure.” Right now, Congress is working on a $1 billion bill known as the Civics Secures Democracy Act. No Republican should trust the Biden administration with a billion dollars to spend on such programs. Even worse, the legislation threatens to establish a de facto national curriculum for history and civics, effectively bribing states into adopting the Left’s anti-American curriculum. It is Common Core all over again—but much more extreme. And like Common Core, parents must unite to stop this new federal power grab.

Fifth, any parent who objects to the material being taught to their child in public school should get an automatic voucher, empowering them to pick another school of their choice. The government has no right to brainwash students with controversial ideologies against their parents’ will.

Sixth, states need to take back control of their schools of education and credentialing bodies to ensure they are not churning out radicalized teachers. To be clear, the overwhelming majority of our nation’s teachers are some of the most selfless and wonderful people there are—but regrettably, many have graduated from extremely biased education schools and may not even be aware of the degree to which leftist ideology has permeated their curriculum. States should set up alternative credentialing bodies that can certify great teachers who know how to instill a sense of love for America. School districts can then make it a priority to hire teachers with these certifications, especially for English, history, and social studies roles. States could even set up their own versions of Teach for America to get passionate and patriotic young people into the classroom.

Finally, states need to break the tenure monopoly in public K-12 schools. Tenure was originally supposed to protect competent teachers from being subjected to undue political influence; it has turned into a mechanism to protect incompetent teachers who themselves wield undue political influence over our children. Educators who are alienating children from their own country should not be protected with lifelong tenure; they should be liberated to pursue a career as a political activist.

Make no mistake: The motive behind all of this left-wing lunacy is to discredit and eliminate the greatest obstacles to the fundamental transformation of America. To succeed with their extreme agenda, radicals know they must abolish our attachment to the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and most of all, Americans’ very identity as a free, proud, and self-governing people. The Left knows that if they can dissolve our national memory and identity, they can gain the total political control they crave.

A nation is only as strong as its spirit. For our children, we must act before it is too late.

President Trump's Thoughts on Critical Race Theory Being Taught in Our Schools

2021-06-21T21:55:00.001-07:00

Critical Race Theory in Schools: A Program

for National Suicide

18 June 2021 by President Donald J Trump

Former President Donald Trump has weighed in on the national debate over the teaching of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in schools, urging lawmakers and parents across the nation to act against what he called “toxic” and “anti-American” indoctrination.

“In classrooms across the nation, students are being subjected to a new curriculum designed to brainwash them with the ridiculous left-wing dogma known as ‘critical race theory,'” Trump wrote in an op-ed published Friday on RealClearPolitics. “The key fact about this twisted doctrine is that it is completely antithetical to everything that normal Americans of any color would wish to teach their children.”

The CRT is rooted in the Marxist theory of class struggle, but with a particular focus on race. Proponents of CRT see racism in every aspect of the American public and private life, and seek to dismantle American institutions—such as the Constitution and legal system—which they deem to be inherently and irredeemably racist.

The effort to promote CRT in K-12 education drew national attention in April when the Education Department proposed a rule to prioritize funding U.S. history and civics programs that incorporate the works of critical race theorist Ibram X. Kendi and the New York Times’ 1619 Project, which centers around the idea that America was founded as, and remains today, a racist nation.

“Instead of helping young people discover that America is the greatest, most tolerant, and most generous nation in history, it teaches them that America is systemically evil and that the hearts of our people are full of hatred and malice,” Trump wrote. “Teaching even one child these divisive messages would verge on psychological abuse.”

“Indoctrinating generations of children with these extreme ideas is not just immoral—it is a program for national suicide,” Trump continued, criticizing the Biden administration for undoing steps his administration has taken to combat the prevalence of CRT.

On his first day in the White House, President Joe Biden dissolved the Trump administration’s advisory 1776 Commission and tossed its first and last report. A ban on the use of training materials based on “divisive and harmful sex and race-based ideologies” in federal agencies and federal contractors was also lifted upon Biden’s inauguration.

In a call to action, Trump urged every “concerned parent in America” to demand their state to pass a ban on taxpayer dollars going to school district or workplace that teaches CRT. He also suggested each state create its own 1776 Commission to examine the public school curriculum and ensure that students are receiving a “patriotic, pro-American education,” and to set their own versions of Teach for America to get “passionate and patriotic” K-12 educators.

As students return to the classroom, Trump said, states need to pass laws requiring that all lesson plans have to be made available to parents. “Every handout, article, and reading should be posted on an online portal that allows parents to see what their kids are being taught,” he wrote.

“A nation is only as strong as its spirit,” Trump wrote. “For our children, we must act before it is too late.”

Trump’s comments come as efforts to incorporate elements of CRT into American classrooms face intense pushback. States that have banned or restricted the teaching of CRT in public schools include Florida, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Texas, while more than a dozen states are considering or have partially imposed similar restrictions."

The Long-Term Implications of Woke Ideology

2021-06-21T21:39:00.000-07:00

From the Epoch Times--one of the very few independent and truthful news organizations left in the United States--comes an eye-opening piece on the long-term, and very serious, implications of the liberal Left's progressive woke ideology wherein "feelings" matter more than facts and truth; where offense is found in literally everything to, as Karl Marx himself put it, the "useful idiots" that spread his poisonous ideology to the unsuspecting masses. Please read the article!

It is fascinating, disturbing, frightening and should scare the hell out of everyone who reads it!

Like it or not, what is described here is happening right now across this Country! It is in our classrooms, our universities and colleges, in our work places, and even in our homes!

Please read this article with urgency so that what could happen, if it actually comes to pass, will not take you by surprise as history begins to repeat itself; thanks to the destructive and poisonous teachings of Karl Marx.

Standing firm against this will take good people, from all walks of life, to fight for the soul of the United States. We must defend our laws, our history, our heritage, everything that has made the US a beacon of hope to the entire world, and we must Defend our Rights and Liberties! We must defend the Constitution of the United States!

Again, please read...

Woke Ideology Mimics Precursors to

Totalitarian Slaughter, Experts Say

BY PETR SVAB

June 21, 2021

Some of the core tenets of the “woke” ideology spreading around the country mimic ideas used to justify many of the most horrendous atrocities of the past century, according to several experts.

A recently released documentary exploring the topic, called “Better Left Unsaid,” concludes that the self-identified “radical left” endorses four fundamental “truths” that they “hold to be self-evident,” noting that these tenets have also been used to justify and incite many of the worst massacres of the 20th century.

The first of the four claims is that “the world is best viewed through a group oppression narrative lens.”

The “woke” ideology is based on a set of quasi-Marxist theories that divide society into “oppressors” and the “oppressed” based on characteristics such as race, sex, class, or sexual proclivities. “Woke” is sometimes used interchangeably with Critical Race Theory (CRT), which is one of the more prominent ideologies that operate within this framework.

The second claim is that “evidence of oppression is the inequality between groups,” the documentary says. If the designated “oppressed” group does on average worse in some regard than the designated “oppressor” group, that is taken as virtually unassailable proof of “oppression.”

The third claim is that “peaceful dialog and understanding between the groups is impossible since the dominant group’s strategy is to retain its power.”

Woke theorists have posited that the “oppressed” have a uniquely valuable perspective on reality unavailable to the “oppressors.” Meanwhile, they say, “whiteness” or “white heteropatriarchy” can’t help but to try to maintain its “hegemony.” Even if it does things that benefit members of other groups, such as by abolishing slavery or giving women and blacks the right to vote, it’s still done out of self-interest and in order to further entrench its institutions and norms and thus ensure the “privilege” of its members.

Proponents of the ideology engage in dialogue between themselves, but with everybody else the communication is supposed to generally flow in one direction—that of acceptance of their views. Any challenge to the ideology is labeled as self-serving or even as an assault on the “oppressed.”

Finally, the ideology at least implicitly acknowledges that “because of the above, violence is justified to eradicate the inequities,” the documentary says.

“From my experience, they (to the degree they can be grouped together enough to call them ‘they’) tend to advocate for violence against those oppressing and equate it to laudatory behavior; hence, ‘punch a Nazi,’” author of the documentary, Curt Jaimungal, told The Epoch Times via email.

“I have catalogs of tweets, written statements, and videos of people ranging from students to [professors] explicitly calling for violence and downplaying the violence of those on the left when compared to the right,” he added, not because of intensity or frequency of such violence, but because of the so-called “nobleness of the extreme left’s position.”

These four tenets, Jaimungal demonstrated in the documentary, are common to many of the most brutal massacres and regimes of the 20th century, from the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany to communist China and the Rwandan genocide.

In each case, an entire class of society is painted as unfairly privileged and as such inherently oppressive, with little regard to specific actions of the individual members of the group. Meanwhile, disagreement with or mere disinterest in this classification is taken as support for the perceived oppression. With reconciliation through dialog taken off the table, the only remaining recourse is conflict—a “revolutionary” action where violence is seen as inevitable and, ultimately, preferable.

“Too few people know about the ceaseless carnage that took place under the masthead of the isomers of equity,” Jaimungal narrates in the documentary.

He said he avoided using examples of atrocities committed as a consequence of the totalitarian nature of the various regimes.

“I am careful to only list or only talk about the deaths associated with the philosophical doctrine of group guilt and class guilt,” he said.

Proponents of socialism commonly argue that the movements that led to these tragedies were commandeered or hijacked by people that didn’t really believe in the ideology. But they have tended to level the argument retrospectively, after they or their like-minded predecessors initially endorsed the movements and nascent regimes, the documentary points out. Also, proponents usually stop short of detailing how the next attempt will prevent any supposed nonbelievers from taking over.

Endorsements

The comparison between the preludes to past massacres and the current manifestations of the woke ideology is a fair one, as long as it’s not taken as an absolute, according to Erec Smith, associate professor of Rhetoric and Composition at York College of Pennsylvania.

“We’re not saying [a massacre] is definitely going to happen, but we need to be cognizant and remember our history and be careful about what’s going on here,” he told The Epoch Times.

Jaimungal’s conclusions were also recently endorsed by several scholars of totalitarianism, all of whom are critical of woke ideology. They were invited to comment on the film by Pat Kambhampati, chemistry professor and head of the Society for Academic Freedom and Scholarship at McGill University in Canada.

“The same ideas that gave rise to Curt’s movie and the discussion of communism, we see a lot of parallels and isomorphisms taking place in the West and within academia,” he said during a May 31 panel discussion on topics raised by the documentary.

Janice Fiamengo, retired English professor at the University of Ottawa and self-declared anti-feminist, backed Jaimungal’s argument during the panel discussion. She was also featured in the film.

“As soon as one establishes these oppressor groups and oppressed groups, then when you are speaking supposedly on behalf of the oppressed, you can do nearly anything,” she said.

Gad Saad, evolutionary psychology professor at Concordia University, put forth the point during the panel that people professing utopian goals have a tendency toward eliminating those who oppose them.

“Utopians believe that the world could be a perfect place except for this one group that is stopping the world from becoming a perfect place,” he said.

Another panelist, retired New York University professor of liberal studies Michael Rectenwald, linked the woke ideology’s potential to unleash totalitarian force to its postmodern roots.

Postmodernism introduced the idea of fundamental relativism, professing that there is no objective truth, but instead the powers that be establish as true whatever is in their interest.

While the documentary notes that this notion is itself a “truth claim” and thus undermines its own validity, Rectenwald pointed out that adoption of the notion has serious real-life implications.

“The problem with this is not simply that we have no criteria for truth claims with this kind of notion, but rather it leaves open the possibility that when it has the requisite power behind it then anything can be asserted and can be asserted with force,” he said.

He gave the example of the ideology behind the transgender movement sweeping through government institutions.

“The force of the state is behind it and they can say that if you don’t accept that your child is a boy or a girl when they are the other then you could go to jail for this … or you could lose custody of your child,” he said.

“So when my truth becomes as good or better than any objective truth then we get to this point where the requisite power is applied and therefore we get the kind of authoritarianism and totalitarianism that we saw in the Soviet Union where people were forced to maintain things they knew to be false.”

Memes of Survival

Jaimungal defended in his film not only physical truths, but argued that just as there are “preserved genes” in human DNA that stand virtually unchanged through time and would be catastrophic to meddle with, there are also “preserved memes”—ideas that stand true throughout history and are similarly crucial to maintain, timeless lessons one can find in many religious scriptures and ancient stories.

These ideas are ingrained in humans, but have also been “externalized,” meaning imprinted on the external world in the form of the written word, art, rituals, and so on, he says in the film.

“Our survival depends on these ‘externalized memes.’”

Clinical psychologist and professor Jordan Peterson touched upon this topic during the panel discussion, noting the damage to the Western mythos inflicted by certain scientific theories, particularly Darwinism, and the subsequent substitution of the religious underpinnings of Western culture by an ideological ersatz.

“I could say to the atheists among the group, you know, ‘You’re not too fond of religion. How are you feeling about its replacement?'” he said.

In an “intact culture” a person is “inculturated” by the age of about 18 into “a religious belief that saturates the entire culture,” he said.

“It’s granted to you, it gives you an identity, and that’s what your identity is.”

Western culture has become in this sense fragmented, he argued, as it now lacks such a comprehensive unifying ethos.

Students still come to universities with a “messianic” urge, craving an initiation of this sort, but what they’re offered instead is an ideology, which he described as “a parasite on an underlying religious structure.”

“A proper religious structure gives you a balanced view of the world, there’s characters for that negative part of nature, there’s characters for the positive part of nature, for the negative part of culture, for the positive part of culture. [It] gives you a view that enables you to look at the world and it’s existential permanences, I guess, in a manner that allows you to live a balanced life.”

Ideology, he said, doesn’t serve this purpose.

“You get indoctrinated into an ideology and you find where Satan is, you know, it’s not in you, it’s out there in the patriarchal oppressor, let’s say. And the thing about that is that it rings true mythologically and it is also true because every culture is oppressive to some degree and we’re all crushed as individuals by the dictates of arbitrary society. And kids get into the university and they’re taught this one-sided, lopsided doctrine with a utopian end and it matches their developmental needs perfectly,” he said.

If an ideology is accepted as an intimate part of one’s identity, it becomes difficult to let go of as it provides the person’s life meaning, Fiamengo noted.

“They would actually rather die than admit that they’re wrong,” she said.

Part of the solution, the panelists agreed, would be to restore universities to their original purpose of pursuing objective truth.

Super Bowl 53 | Ragged Old Flag

2021-05-31T07:54:00.000-07:00

Racism is Racism, Even If It IS Woke and Progressive

2021-05-20T15:34:00.000-07:00

From the Washington Examiner comes a terrific opinion piece that examines Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoots' recent exclamation that from now on, she would only be interviewed one on one by non-white reporters. On other sites I have correctly labeled this as blatant racism. This opinion piece fleshes out my exact thoughts on this woke, progressive matter that does nothing but harm to our Country, our communities and ultimately, to ourselves. Please read...

(By Zachary Faria)

"Progressive" Racism Is Still Racism, and It Should

Not Be Tolerated or Shrugged Off"

"Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot's latest decision is racist. There is no other way to describe it. And “progressive” racism like that must be stamped out the same as any other strain.

Lightfoot has decided she will discriminate against reporters based on skin color, only offering one-on-one interviews to nonwhite reporters. Her justification is that Chicago media outlets are too white, and so “in order to progress, we must change.”

But this isn’t progress. Racism will never be progress. And there is no other way to describe Lightfoot’s decision than that it is explicitly racist. It doesn’t matter what kind of woke nonsense about “equity” you try to qualify this decision with. It is racism by any definition, boiling down the entire life and career accomplishments of every member of the Chicago media to their level of melanin.

What’s more, is that this performative woke racism is designed to earn her progressive praise and drown out coverage of her abysmal leadership in the Windy City. There have been 225 homicides in Chicago so far this year, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. In just 139 days, 225 people have been killed on Lightfoot’s watch. The Chicago Tribune puts that number at 227 while noting that Chicago is 36 homicides ahead of its 2020 pace.

While Lightfoot determines who is too white for her to talk to, the Sun-Times list of homicide victims lists 185 black victims, along with 23 Hispanics. The Chicago Tribune tracker states that 596 black people have been killed in Chicago in the last 365 days, along with 66 Hispanic victims.

Lightfoot is a perfect representative of progressive racism. Pretend you care about equity by making a flashy show of discrimination while ignoring real issues in the communities for which you claim to be fighting.

Just because this kind of racism has become mainstream among progressives and leaders of the Democratic Party does not mean it should be shrugged off. It is still grotesque and anti-American and always will be. It is used not to achieve “equity” but to fuel hatred and division. This racial obsession views everyone as unthinking drones, products of one's racial group and little else. It’s a primitive idea that has no place in a civilized society.

Lightfoot’s racism should be called what it is. She should be made to answer for it. And then she should be asked why it is that she is focused on the skin color of journalists while black and other nonwhite residents are being gunned down in record numbers in the streets of Chicago, under her watch."

Chinese Document Discussed Weaponising Coronaviruses in 2015!

2021-05-10T17:27:00.001-07:00

From Sky News in Australia comes a new in-depth report about high-ranking Chinese officials discussing (in 2015) the potential of releasing a pandemic onto the world!

This will NEVER be reported by the MSM here in the US, nor will Mindless Joe and his puppet masters admit what they likely already know; so spread the word of this new report, and stop believing the W.H.O narrative on the origins of the Wuhan Virus.

This pandemic was no accident!

CA State Officials Conspire With Big Tech to Sway 2020 Presidential Election

2021-04-30T07:22:00.002-07:00

From Governmental Watchdog group Judicial Watch comes ANOTHER bombshell revelation about a vast conspiracy to sway voters in the 2020 Presidential Election Cycle. Please read this latest info:

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch announced today that it received 540 pages and a supplemental four pages of documents from the office of the Secretary of State of California revealing how state officials pressured social media companies (Twitter, Facebook, Google (YouTube)) to censor posts about the 2020 election. Included in these documents were “misinformation briefings” emails that were compiled by communications firm SKDK, that lists Biden for President as their top client of 2020. The documents show how the state agency successfully pressured YouTube to censor a Judicial Watch video concerning the vote by mail and a Judicial Watch lawsuit settlement about California voter roll clean up.

The records were obtained in response to Judicial Watch’s California Public Records Act (CPRA) requests to the Office of the California Secretary of State for records related to the Office of Election Cybersecurity’s database of social media posts; communications with social media companies; and other social media related records regarding the 2020 elections. Judicial Watch filed the requests after a December 2020 report surfaced that the state agency was surveilling, tracking, and seeking to censor the speech of Americans:

The Office of Election Cybersecurity in the California Secretary of State’s office monitored and tracked social media posts, decided if they were misinformation, stored the posts in an internal database coded by threat level, and on 31 different occasions requested posts be removed. In 24 cases, the social media companies agreed and either took down the posts or flagged them as misinformation, according to Jenna Dresner, senior public information officer for the Office of Election Cybersecurity.

“We don’t take down posts, that is not our role to play,” Dresner said. “We alert potential sources of misinformation to the social media companies and we let them make that call based on community standards they created.”

On September 24, 2020, a California Secretary of State chartlists a video from Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton and falsely alleges:

Head of conservative group Judicial Watch Hosts video alleging Democrats benefit from incorrect voter rolls and ballot collection.

The Secretary of State’s office details its communication with YouTube: “We wanted to flag this YouTube video because it misleads community members about elections or other civic processes and misrepresents the safety and security of mail-in ballots.” The chart quotes Fitton describing Judicial Watch’s statement about its federal lawsuit settlement with Los Angeles County that will require it to clean up voter rolls and how a Michigan court “changed the rules” on ballot deadlines and ballot harvesting. (The controversial decision was overturned in October 2020.)

The document shows that California state officials contacted YouTube directly to remove the video on September 24, 2020, and that YouTube seemed to respond by deleting the video on September 27, 2020.

On September 11, 2020, outside consultant Zeke Sandoval, of the SKDK communications firm, provides the Secretary of State’s Office a “Misinformation Daily Briefing,” which again targets Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton:

Trump tweeted, “The big Unsolicited Ballot States should give it up NOW, before it is too late, and ask people to go to the Polling Booths and, like always before, VOTE. Otherwise, MAYHEM!!! Solicited Ballots (absentee) are OK,” and Twitter was quick to fact check and shared a link with info about how voting by mail is safe and secure. Viral reply on Twitter from Tom Fitton asserting, “Mailing 51 million ballots to those who haven’t asked for increases risk of voter fraud and voter intimidation!”

A 30-page “Misinformation Tracking Sheet” lists social media posts that the office disagrees with and has asked social media companies to remove.

In an internal email on January 12, 2021, Deputy Secretary of State and Chief Communications Officer Paula Valle emails Chief Counsel Steve Reyes and Jenna Dresner in the Office of Cybersecurity, as well as Press Secretary Sam Mahood stating that she is uncomfortable with CalMattersreporter Fred Brewster’s questions about the office’s tracking and censoring efforts:

Hi Steve – Please see below – the reporter at Cal Matters who PRA’d us is doing a follow-up story. We asked him to send us his questions. I am not necessarily comfortable with his line of questions and the additional doors that this will open. I want to get your feedback I would simply like to give him a statement about what our goal is and leave it at that. Thoughts?

Brewster’s questions, which include concerns from citizens who were targeted by the “Misinformation Tracker,” were sent on January 12, 2021:

I reached out to the users on page 7 and page 21 of the Misinformation Tracker request I received. Both individuals wanted to know how their posts ended up being labeled misinformation and how, given their relatively small following, they came to the attention of the Office of Election Cybersecurity?

Another user named “DC O’Bryan” had his post taken down (page 5 of the Misinformation Tracker). In an email, you highlight a report sent to the state that says, “I don’t know if this is hot air meant to provoke. If it is, a call from an official might get the point across that you don’t joke about election fraud.” Was O’Bryan called to confirm that his post was a joke?

How does the Office of Election Cybersecurity differentiate between parody and satire and misinformation?

Did CISA, Facebook, or any other partners provide guidance on how to spot and define misinformation? If someone has their posts in the Misinformation Tracker, are there plans to contact those individuals and is there a way for them to petition the state to delete them?

The Secretary of State’s Office emails Facebook and Twitter on April 25,2019, with requests from the Office to remove tweets and posts for what they have labeled “misinformation.”

The office emails Facebook, attempting to set up a call to discuss removing future posts. This 15-minute call is with “new Facebook contact for social media reporting: Javier Hernandez, Politics & Government Outreach” in order to discuss how the office will report posts to Facebook. In the email, Facebook outlines its goals to directly work with “electoral authorities in every state” so that they can “report instances of voter suppression on Facebook directly to our team, so [Facebook] can look at them quickly and remove them from the site.”

On December 31, 2019, after the Secretary of State’s office reports a tweet to Support@Twitter.com, Kevin Kane, a Twitter representative, replies and offers his direct contact for the Office’s future needs in removing posts.

In a September 21, 2020, email chain with the subject line “elections issue,” Jenna Dresner in the Secretary of State’s Office of Cybersecurity writes to “Cristina and team” at Facebook at 11:43 a.m.: “We want to flag this Instagram post.”

The reply comes from Facebook Community Operations: “Thank you for your report. We have reviewed the … content and can confirm that the content has been removed …” At 12:53 pm. Dresner writes to Press Secretary Sam Mahood, Social Media Coordinator Akilah Jones and others, “Post from this morning was removed (and fast!) Akilah we can update tracker.”

In an October 28, 2020, email, Jones writes to Flores at Facebook and CCs Dresner that a post, which was from a user named @Screenplaywale, “voters are being asked to gerrymander and voter suppress their ‘trump supporting father’s ballots.’”

In an email chain on September 14, 2020, titled “Election Issue” the office internally complains about how long it takes Facebook to remove a post and how to speed up this process.

Mahood writes to Dresner: “It looks like it took Facebook 2 weeks to respond to Chris. This is way too long, we should raise to FB and make sure we know best method to report posts.” Dresner responds: “Sure – I’m 98% sure this is the one you chased with an email directly to our FB contacts which resulted in it taken down that day. I can confirm that process works for the future?”

On August 22, 2019, Maria Benson, director of communications for the National Association of Secretaries of State emails the communications directors for Secretaries of State offices that Twitter confirmed that they streamlined their process for government officials to report “misinformation:”

Great news—Twitter is now on-boarding states into their mis/disinformation partner support portal! Once on-boarded, you will be able to directly report mis/disinformation instead of having to submit it to me first….” [Emphasis in original]

Benson also gives contact information for Facebook and Google complaints, and says: “If any of the items you reported do not get prompt attention, please let me know and I can also reach out the companies.”

On September 24, 2019, The California Secretary of State’s office confirms that it plans to participate in Facebook’s “misinformation” training which is a review from Facebook on “monitoring guidelines for reporting misinformation” and teaches participants how to use the direct reporting channel Facebook opened for them.

On October 1, 2020, Benson forwards information from Twitter about their training to directly remove posts they label as misinformation to the Secretary of State’s office. This is described by Twitter as: “training on creative and effective content strategies on Twitter in advance of the U.S. Election,” as well as “onboarding state and local election officials onto Twitter’s Partner Support Portal.” This portal is described as, “a dedicated way for critical stakeholders – like you – to flag concerns directly to Twitter.”

“These new documents suggest a conspiracy against the First Amendment rights of Americans by the California Secretary of State, the Biden campaign operation, and Big Tech,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These documents blow up the big lie that Big Tech censorship is ‘private’ – as the documents show collusion between a whole group of government officials in multiple states to suppress speech about election controversies.”

Undercover Video Shows Proof that CNN Worked Tirelessly to Oust President Trump From Office!

2021-04-14T07:18:00.000-07:00

In another bombshell revelation, Project Veritas has filmed a Director at CNN who states unequivocally that CNN was 100% biased against President Trump during his time in Office! Please read...

CNN Director Shown on Undercover Video Boasting About Removing Trump From Office, and Admitting to Spreading Propaganda

(From Andrew Mark Miller at the Washington Examiner)

"A CNN staffer can be seen in a newly released undercover video calling out his own network for “propaganda” and boasting that the cable news giant successfully removed former President Donald Trump from office.

"Look at what we did, we got Trump out," Charles Chester, a network technical director at CNN, said to an undercover journalist from the political action group Project Veritas in a tape released Tuesday. "I am 100% going to say it. And I 100% believe it that if it wasn't for CNN, I don't know that Trump would have got voted out."

Chester spoke to the undercover reporter in several clips in which he bragged that he was “one step down” from a director and admitted that the network pushed a story it “didn’t know anything about” relating to Trump’s physical health in order to damage him.

"Trump was, I don't know, like, shaking his hand or whatever ... We brought in, like, so many medical people to like all tell a story that, like, it was all speculation that he was, like, neurologically damaged, that he was losing it, he's unfit to, you know, whatever," Chester said. "We were creating a story that we didn't know anything about."

Chester added that the network did what it could to paint President Joe Biden as young and healthy to combat criticisms of his old age and possibly declining mental facilities.

“We would always show shots of him jogging ... him in his aviator shades, and, like, you paint him as a young geriatric," Chester said.

Chester’s online profile on LinkedIn, which has been taken down, said his work "played an integral part" in the 2020 presidential election.

Chester also admitted that CNN was engaged in propaganda in the way it has been criticizing firebrand Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz, who faces allegations of sexual impropriety with a 17-year-old, allegations he has vehemently denied.

“If the agenda, say, is to get Matt Gaetz right now, he’s, like, this Republican,” Chester said in response to a question from the undercover journalist on how he defines propaganda. “He’s a problem for the Democratic Party ... So we’re going to keep running these stories to keep hurting him. That’s propaganda because it’s helping CNN in some way.”

Gaetz responded to the news on Twitter simply saying, “OMG!”

Now that Trump has been removed from office, Chester says the network will move on to pushing climate change and asked if that meant the network would try to scare viewers with gloomy climate warnings, Chester said, “Yeah. Fear sells.”

CNN did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Washington Examiner regarding the controversy or Chester’s current status with the network."