Islam - The Right Path

Israeli 'Settlers' or Terrorists and Provocateurs?

2023-10-17T23:27:00.005-07:00

In the ongoing war in Gaza, a narrative has been built that Israeli 'civilians' were attacked by Hamas 'terrorists'. While the main stream zionist media is ready to project Israel as the victim, fact of the matter is that these people are no 'civilians'. These so called Israeli 'settlers' enter palestinian territories with sole objective of stealing their homes, farms and vehicles. They do it petty straight forward- a gun to the head of the Palestinian. The Palestinians are told to either leave or die. If the Palestinian resists, next day breaking news headlines tell us that there was a terror attack against an Israeli settler.

Palestinians in East Jerusalem evicted by military and their homes given to Israeli 'settlers.'

Isrseli 'settler' Yacoob steals Palestian home and his logic: "If I dont steal it someone else will."

Settlers attack citizens' homes in the village of Madama, south of Nablus.

Israeli 'defence' personnel harassing a small boy

Very peaceful Israeli 'settlers' desecrating Muslim graves: link

Israeli 'defence' forces beating worshippers inside mosque Al Aqsa.

Peaceful Israeli 'settlers' occupying Palestinian homes and colonies with mafia style Israeli 'defence' forces.

Israeli 'defence' forces trampling prayers mats and shoving peaceful worshippers inside mosque of Al Aqsa link

This has been a regular thing in the occupied lands of Israel. in the pqst 6 months such provocations/assults on the Palestinians became almost a daily routine. But just because the main stream media doesnt show this on the TV, for the world and especially for the westerners, all this never happened. Because they are so addicted to the brainwashng done by zionist western media that they have lost all their God given minds, conscience and moral compass.

Banned White Phosphorous bombs used bu israel

2023-10-17T21:42:00.001-07:00

The Human Rights Watch recently released a report stating that israel is using while phosphoroud bombs in Gaza and Lebaon

The above pucture: Al-Manar Correspondent:

The town of Al-Dahira has endured a long night of phosphorus bomb shelling since yesterday.
More than 100 bombs fell within two hours, affecting most of the village where some families still reside. The shelling continued until 5:45 am.

Israeli-French Captive in Gaza

2023-10-17T21:35:00.000-07:00

Hamas' Qassam Brigades releases video of 21 year old Israeli-French captive in Gaza, Miya Shem, who sustained injuries from gunfire in her arm.

She underwent surgery upon her arrival and is being taken care of while in captivity.

Heavy firing at 'Metulla' Garrison

2023-10-17T21:26:00.000-07:00

After firing flares due to a suspected case of infiltration, the zionist garrison in “Metulla” just south of Lebanon carried out a sweeping campaign with heavy machine guns. Gunfire was directed towards the orchards around the settlement.

This, along with Iranian Foreign Minister Abdollahian’s latest comments, are believed to be the reason that the occupation has faltered in beginning a ground offensive into #Gaza.

Gaza: Al Ahli Baptist Hospital Massacre

2023-10-17T20:36:00.005-07:00

The Al Ahli Baptist Hospital in Gaza strip was bombed heavily by Israeli terrorist state, stooping to a new low. More than 500 people were killed and 850, mostly women, children and the elderly were injured in this terror attack.

Many of the people in the hospital were there to take shelter after Israel had issued an ultimatum to vacate north Gaza. These people thought they were safe. Little did they know that Israel has other plans.

In the above video, a boy tries to make his critically injured (maybe dying) sister to recite the shahadah.

Baptist hospital before the airstrike by Israeli terrorists

Doctor at the hospital says 'its really a genocide.'

"Rare to find all parts of the body at one place."

The Israeli terror attack was so brutal and inhuman that Israel's close ally, Saudi Arbia too had to issue a statement condemning the attack.

Markeva tank exploded

2023-10-17T19:54:00.002-07:00

Operation targeting a Merkava tank on the Jurdah Hill "Al-Dahira area" - Western Sector
16-10-2023

The Martyr Ali Kamel Mohsen group in the Islamic Resistance targeted an “israeli” tank in the Jurdah Hill in the Dahira area with guided missiles and achieved a direct hit.

Covid-19 End Game is To End Pax Americana and Bring in Pax Judaica: Sheikh Imran Hosein.

2021-07-07T11:51:00.004-07:00

Sheikh Imran's full video on Covid19.

Sheikh Imran Hosein is arguably the most prominent personality in the subject of Islamic Eschatology. He has been predicting a 'fake virus' and 'fake pandemic' that would be used as an excuse to impose restrictions on Hajj and Umrah, from almost a decade. He had also warned about a global take over by Zionist banking cabal which would establish a one world government with Jerusalem as its capital.

Now Sheikh Imran Hosein has released a video statement about Covid-19 pandemic which he calls 'the end game.' He says that according to the Quranic knowledge, its clear that the virus is not natural and its man made, coming from a laboratory. "Allah created this universe with truth embedded in it. A virus which embraces entire of mankind cannot be coming from nature, it would be unjust order not a moral order." The Sheikh predicts that the virus would stay around for several years- coming and going repeatedly in cycles- thus destroying the economies of nations, especially those of the middle class and the poor. Terming Covid-19 a Biological Warfare, Sheikh Imran Hosein throws some light on the 'End Game.' "The End Game is located in the Holy Land (Jerusalem). This virus has Zionist roots in it." Remembering about the Prophecy of Rasool Allah (saw) which predicts that the Arabs would be wiped out in a plague, Sheikh Imran postulates that that plague or virus would be DNA specific in order to specifically infect the Arabs. The Sheikh also advices the medical community to not look at this virus in medical terms alone, as such a phenomenon never happened in history of mankind.

How would our Prophet (asaihissalaam) respond to such a Pandemic:

Criticizing the world governments for towing the line of WHO and following it blindly, Sheikh Imran says the Zionists are playing games with us and running a circus (tamasha) with their regulations like Face masks, social distancing, lockdowns, closing of masjids. "What has our Prophet (asaihissalaam) said about a virus? How would He (asaihissalaam) respond? You (government of Pakistan) proclaim that you love the Prophet (saw), (but) are you capable of thinking? If He (saw) was here today in Islamabad, how would he respond?" "This is what our Prophet (saw) said, 'If you are in a location where the virus has struck, dont leave. And if you are outside dont enter.' Indicating that He (saw) was conscious of the fact that the virus can spread from one person to another. What The Prophet (saw) said would amount to quarantine. But He (saw) would impose it when there was adequate evidence (not based on cooked up evidence) that a plague or epidemic is in place."" The Prophet (saw) also said that if you are in a place where virus is present and you don't leave and you die, you go to heaven. You will be a Marty. "" Would He (saw) shutdown the market? Would He (saw) say 'you can't go to work and can't earn your livelihood?' Would He (saw) say 'you can't sell in the market and earn your bread?' Would He (saw) say 'you can't go to a masjid and perform prayer?' Would He (saw) do every single possible thing within the area of epidemic to try to separate people from each other? NO. Our Prophet (saw) never said that you should reorganize your life in an area where epidemic is taking place. LIFE GOES ON in an area where epidemic is taking place."" So you (governments) have no right to disrupt the economy. You have no right to disrupt people's livelihoods."" I don't see any Muslim challenging the authority of a government to stop people from going to masjid. But I see a Christian minister doing that."" Did the Prophet (alaissalam) allow you to stand 3 feet apart in the masjid, like monkeys?"

About Vaccines:

"I don't trust people who manufacture a virus and wage biological war. So I won't trust their vaccine. If I am forced to take a vaccine, I will take the Russian one because Russia is Christian. I don't want the vaccine, life and death are in Allah's hands. And it is Allah who will decide when I will die, not a vaccine, not a virus. "

Concluding Comments:

"Using a virus as a biological weapon. But don't you (the evil elite) know that Allah can also do it? If you prepare poison for us to drink, one day you are going to drink the same poison." The Sheikh ends his statement reminding us how Gog and Magog are going to die of a virus plague when Jesus (asaihissalaam) will take the believers on a mountain and pray to Allah to destroy Gog and Magog. They (Gog and Magog) will be infected on their necks and will be paralyzed and die in that state.

Britain and Al Saud: The Zionist Great Game in Arabia.

2021-06-14T09:42:00.034-07:00

Click Here.

1908 to 1909 was a very sad year in contemporary Islamic history. This was the year when the British puppets, the three Pashas (Enver Pasha, Talat Pasha and Cemal Pasha) had revolted against Khalifa Abdul Hamid II, the last true Khalifa of Muslims, and seized power in Ottoman Turkey. In 1891, The Donmeh Jews had set up a network of secret organizations within the military and political class around the Khalifa in Istanbul, promoting western ideology and opposing the authoritarian rule of Khalifa Abdul Hamid II. This secret organization spread its poison against the Khalifa like water spreading under the mat. It was called the 'Committee of Union and Progress' informally known as the 'Young Turks.' After Abdul Hamid II, puppets of the Young Turk were put in the seat of Khalifa who had nothing but a nominal role in empire's affairs.

In the Arabian peninsula, British stooge Mohammad Ibn Abdal Wahhab Najdi was expelled from home town of Uyayna for his extremist views and wrong interpretation of Quran and Hadith. He took protection in Diriyah where another British stooge, Mohammad Ibn Saud was the ruler, in 1741. The British Spy Humphrey played a vital role in uniting these two treacherous personalities who would later plant a devastating sect of fitnah, murder, confusion, persecution and oppression of Muslims all over the world, which continues to this day. In 1744, Mohammad Ibn Abdal Wahhab Najdi and Mohammad Ibn Saud entered a power sharing agreement (on instruction of their British handlers) wherein, Ibn Saud would provide protection for Ibn Wahhab for propagating his new sect of extremist ideology and in return Ibn Wahhab would provide religious impetus and support of the Wahhabi zealots for the military expeditions of Ibn Saud. Ibn Saud's son Abdul Aziz was married to Ibn Wahhab's daughter to seal this pact. With this pact, the first Saudi State was established in 1744. From that day on, Ibn Saud and his wahhabi extremists killed, maimed, raped, plundered Muslim villages and caravans which would not agree to their extremist ideology of Wahhabism. Ibn Wahhab claimed he was doing jihad to bring Islam back to its true form and he gave a fatwa to his followers that whoever dies in this holy war would go to Jannah and whoever lives can get the booty and loot Muslims, as Muslims' lives, property, land, women and children were all declared 'halal' for the wahhabi extremists.

In 1773, Riyad was conquered by Ibn Saud (reconquered in 1902) and became the main city of Najdi Kingdom. In 1790s, Ibn Saud and his Wahhabi dogs repeatedly raided Madina, Syria and Iraq. In 1801 the Wahhabis attacked Karbala and in 1803 they attacked Makkah mukarramah. The Wahhabis would attack, kill, plunder, loot and then retreat back into the deep deserts of Najd, only to regroup and attack Muslim villages and caravans again at will. In October 1811, Ottoman-Egyptian army entered Madina and by 1813, Makkah was retaken from the Wahhabis. The raids and attacks from the Wahhabis never stopped. But Hejaz was safe with Hashmite King Hussain Sharif who was under the Ottoman protection. Muslims were able to repel the attacks of wahhabi terrorists all through the 1800s up until 1920s.

In 1902, Abdul Aziz Ibn Abdur Rahman became the ruler of Najd. In 1915 Abdul Aziz became a protectorate of British Empire after agreeing to a Jewish state in Palestine with Bracey Cocas, British Envoy to Gulf. By 1916 Abdul Aziz (Ibn Saud) received 20,000 GBP as loan, arms shipments, monthly stipend of 5000 BGP. This is called treaty of Darin.

1916 Arab Revolt:

After Abdul Hamid II was deposed by the Young Turks, there was increasing western influence in Ottoman empire with Islam being sidelined. This did not go down well with the ruler of Hejaz, Sharif Hussain Ibn Ali. He wanted to break free from the Ottoman (now the un-Islamic Young Turks) The Wahhabis try and hide their treachery by covering it with the 'Arab revolt' and by projecting Sharif as the traitor who revolted against the Ottoman Khalifa. But in fact Sharif of Hejaz revolted against the puppet Khalifa of the Young Turks, while the Wahhabis were colluding with the British Empire in secret, to occupy Hejaz. Sharif justified his revolt against the Young Turks who according to him "were violating the sacred tenets of Islam and discriminating against non-Turkish populations". Indeed the Young Turks were a horrible bunch, they dragged Ottoman Empire and joined forces with Germany in the first world war and thereby paved the way for the dissolution of Ottoman Empire.

The British cunningly entered into correspondence with Sharif of Hejaz in the 1900s, offering an independent Arab country free from the Ottoman (Young Turk) influence. In June 10th 1916, the official revolt began. The Hashmite forces with the help of Britain and France was able to defeat the Ottoman forces. The British empire had no intention of sticking to their promise of recognizing a United Arab State stretching from Syria to Yemen (including Palestine)- a promise they had made to Sharif of Hejaz in the McMohan-Hussain correspondence. Instead the British empire made a secret agreement with the French, called the Sykes-Picot agreement with prior agreements with Russia and Italy. Agenda was to split the Ottoman empire into various 'spheres of influence' distributed among the signatories. The British through their influence on Young Turks already had a death path laid for Ottoman Empire, by joining it with Germany in the first world war. The stage was set to break the Ottoman Empire into multiple small kingdoms and share them among the British empire and its allies.

The British-Saudi Game Begins:

In 1917, British signed the Balfour Declaration promising a Jewish Homeland in Palestine. Signed by Arthur Balfour, British Foreign Secretary and Lionel Rothschild of the Zionist movement. Soon after the victory in the Arab revolt, Sharif Hussain reminded the British about their promises made in the McMohan-Hussain correspondence. But the British in turn demanded Sharif to accept a Jewish homeland in Palestine (Balfour declaration) and to ratify the Sykes-Picot agreement, which the Sharif outright rejected. At the Cairo conference of 1921, the British empire dispatched Lawrence (of Arabia) to offer Sharif with an annual payment of 100,000 GBP but Sharif refused to sell out Palestine and for the breaking of Muslim lands into pieces. The British then threatened Sharif with the Wahhabi takeover.

Meanwhile in 1920 Cairo conference, Churchil and Percy Cox (a crypto jew and British Indian Army Officer who later held many high diplomatic positions in the British Empire, especially in the Middle East) agreed on giving Hail (ruled by Ibn Rashid) to Ibn Saud. In 1922, Abdul Azid (Ibn Saud) signed the declaration at Al Aqeer conference agreeing for a Jewish State in Palestine. By March 1923, British showered 50,000 BGP to Ibn Saud, 10,000 Gold, 10,000 rifles, 4 field guns with British-Indian instructors. In March1924, Ibn Saud and the Wahhabis attack Sharif after a call from Lord Curzon (British Foreign Secretary) for the 'final kick' of Sharif. September 1924, Wahhabis overrun Taif, the summer capital of Sharif and the customary massacres and persecution of traditional Sunnis followed. Oct 1924 Ibn Saud captured Makkah. Sharif escaped to Transjordan where his son was the ruler. January 1925 to December 1925, Jeddah was captured by Ibn Saud. Each city witnessed the customary slaughter, persecution, rapes and plunder of Sunnis who did not accept the Wahhabi ideology in hands of the Ibn Saud. At once Rothschild agents, Zionists and the British Empire recognized Abdul Aziz as the new king. In 1932, the name Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was given to the united kingdom of Najd, Hejaz, Hassa and surrounding areas. Sharif on his part never accepted the Arab mandates and protested against the British idea of Jewish homeland in Palestine.

Sharif Hussain of Hejaz.

In 1943, Mohammad Amin Al Tamimi, Director/Manager of Contemporary Libraries of Saudi Kingdom forged a false genealogical tree depicting the Saud and Wahhabi families both descended from the Blessed family of Rasool Allah (saw). He was paid 35,000 Egyptian pounds by Saudi Ambassador in Cairo, Ibrahim Al Fadel for this. The Saudis have time and again played the game of lies, deceit and treachery again and again over the years in an attempt to legitimize their rule and their Wahhabi ideology.

References and Further Reading:

The Destruction of Jannatul Baqi: A case of Wahhabi Iconoclasm- Mohammad Adeel, Undergraduate Journal of Middle East Studies, Canada.
Abdul Aziz Al Saud and The Great Game in Arabia (1896 to 1946)- Mohammad Al Mutairi.
Rehatsek- The History of Wahhabys in Arabia and India.
Ibn Bishr- Unwan al Majd Tarikh Najd. Lorimer, Gazetter of Persian Gulf.
The Beginning and Spreading of Wahhabism- Ayyub Sabri Pasha.
The Donmeh Jews- Mustafa Turan.
The Wahhabi Movement: The Truth and Roots- Abdul Wahhab Ibrahim al Shammari.
The History of Saudi Family- Said Nasir.
The Wahhabi Mission and Saudi Arabia- David Commings.
America's Kingdom- Mythmaking on Saudi Oil Frontier. - Robert Vitalis.
Saudi State Wahhabi World- The Globalization of Muslim Radicalism.- Naveed S. Sheikh.
Two Faces of Islam.- Stephen Schwartz.
Confessions of a British Spy and British Enmity against Islam.: Humphrey.
Emergence of Al Wahhabiyyah movement and its Historical Roots.- Military Intelligence Document of Iraq. Click Here.
Wahhabi Sect: Illuminati, New World Order Creation.

Shaan e Mustafa (ﷺ)

2021-06-02T10:36:00.002-07:00

The high status of Rasool Allah (ﷺ) described by Allah himself in the holy Quran. The qaari is from Pakistan, I do not know his name. Kindly leave a comment if you know him. Everytime I listen to this short clip, I get goosebumps and tears. Enjoy yourselves.

Tatar Muslim Role in Finland's Winter War- Resisting the Russian Invasion.

2021-05-26T06:25:00.008-07:00

Tatars are nomadic Turk tribes which settled in Russia, especially along the Volga. Tatars came to Finland along with the Russian Army when Finland became a subject of Russian Empire in 1809. Tatars were among the Russian troops stationed at Finland. Some of them stayed back in Finland and made it their homeland. In the Winter war and the Continuation war, when Russia invaded Finland in 1939, Finnish Tartars joined the war to protect Finland. 9 of them were martyred in the war. Finnish Tartars had another special ability which was very useful in the war- they knew Russian language. With this special skill, they were used to propaganda and prisoner interrogations.

Names of 9 Tartars who were martyred in Winter War of Finland: At The War Memorial in Helsinki.

In 1965, a war memorial was built in an Islamic Cemetery in Helsinki. On every third Sunday in May, Finland remembers its war heroes and this Islamic War Memorial is also visited by State dignitaries, wreaths are laid and speeches are given.

When Kuwaiti National Assembly Speaker Expelled Israeli Delegation.

2021-05-23T07:02:00.001-07:00

Event: At the International Parliamentary Union held in St. Petersburg, Russia.

Date: Oct 3017.

Mr. Marzouk al Ganim called Israeli delegates 'child killers' and 'occupiers' and asked them to 'get out if you have any shame.' Soon after, the Israeli Knesset members can be seen walking out. His remarks were welcomed by Palestinians and Arab citizens.

Full news at alarabiya.

Israel's right to provoke, right to persecute and right to rob the Palestinians in the name of 'Defense'.

2021-05-19T15:52:00.001-07:00

First off, let it be clear that there is no 'conflict' or 'two sides' or 'all parties involved' in the Israel-Palestine issue. Its plain aggression and occupation by Israel and pathetic persecution of Palestinians. The world knows that Israel has far superior military might while Palestinians are homeless, jobless and landless with so called 'Rockets' which are just a little bit more than a firecracker rockets. Once in every few years, Israel provokes Palestine in one way or another and when the desperate Palestinians respond, their meek response is 'retaliated' by Israel. Its almost as if Israel has this obligation to kill Palestinian women and children once in a while. Back in 2009, world was shocked by white phosphorous bombs used by Israel in Palestine.

The latest tensions arose after a Israeli Court had ordered eviction of Palestinian families from East Jerusalem. Israeli 'settlers' were ready to occupy these homes for good. In mid April (Ramadhan), Israeli police started barricading Damascus gate of the occupied Old City. This lead to clashes and the barricades were removed. On May 10, Israeli armed forced stormed Masjid Al Aqsa and fired rubber bullets, stun grenades and tear gas shells at the people in the mosque, claiming that they had gathered there with stones and molotov cocktails. Hamas retaliated with rockets calling the international community to stop Israeli plans to occupy entire of East Jerusalem. Israel 'retaliated' to the Palestinian retaliation with airstrikes and ground invasion.

Israeli airstrikes were indiscriminate and out of proportion, as they always are, bombing schools, hospitals, residential buildings. Even Al Jazeera office and Qatar's Red Crescent office in Gaza were bombed by the airstrikes. These triggered world wide protests against Israel. As always, US blocked-3 times (drafted by China, Norway and Tunisia) in a row- a joint statement against Israel in the UN.

The Israeli 'Iron Dome' was overwhelmed by Palestinian 'rockets' yet again. Rockets landed in Tel Aviv and many other cities with sirens and alarms going off in the cities and people running to shelters with fear of rocket attacks has become talk on the internet. Sophisticated Iron Dome can shoot down any missile coming towards it, but when the number of incoming rockets are more than its capacity (Say 12 counter missiles per battery), its just not possible to shoot down all of them. Each missile used by Iron Dome battery costs 10,000 to 20,000 USD, while the crude home made 'rockets' made by Palestinians come at 200 USD. No matter how much the western media praise the Iron Dome, its evident that the cutting edge technology and military power of Iron Dome was overwhelmed with sheer common sense.

Israel's Strategic 'Settlers':

Israel has always opposed to 2 state solution through its actions (no matter what they say verbally in media), this has been the root cause of continuous animosity between the two peoples. Palestinians and the Arab had previously on number of occasions, agreed to a state of Palestine with East Jerusalem as its capital. But Israel always considered entire Jerusalem as its 'eternal capital'. Israeli government strategically sent in 'settlers' into Palestinian lands, helping them with arms and personnel, thereby blurring the borders of an possible 'two states'. Netanyahu had embarrassed and shamed Barack Obama in AIPAC meeting, saying that Israelis would never give up even bit of Jerusalem and justified the illegal settlers in east Jerusalem saying that Jerusalem was not a settlement but their capital. These statements came soon after the Barack Obama administration had asked Israeli government to stop all illegal settlements in East Jerusalem.

Israelis made Trump to recognize entire Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. With all such provocations and illegal occupation of Palestinian lands and homes, Israel portrays itself as a victim and also makes fun of UN and international organizations, only because Zionists are in total control of US corporations and Banking system. To have any kind of peace in this region, justice and restrain should be imposed on Israel.

Revisiting 9/11- The Israeli Connection- WTC Security was in Zionist hands.

2019-01-10T07:08:00.000-08:00

You are a rich landlord and you hired a security firm for protection of your property. One fine morning you find that you were looted under the very nose of the security firm, its CCTVs, watch posts and guards. Your next step would be? Obviously you would regard the firm as one of the suspects. But this was not the case with the 9/11 attack. Neither the security firm responsible for WTC not the one responsible for airport security were suspects. And guess what? Both the security firms are Zionist firms and their loyalties lie with Israel.

WTC security:

The contract to run the security at WTC was awarded to 'Kroll Associates' after the 1993 WTC bombing. Kroll is otherwise known as the Wallstreet CIA. The contract was awarded by the Port Authority of New York and 2.5 million USD was paid to them to revamp security at the WTC complex. The owners of Kroll, Jules and Jeremy Kroll are staunch Zionist Jews. The managing director of Kroll Associates at that time was Jerome M. Hauser, who was NYC Mayor Rudy Juliani's Office of Emergency Management from 1996 to 2000. He was the key person who pushed for this office to be placed in Silverstein's WTC building 7. Both Mr. Hauser and Mr. Juliani are staunch Zionists.

The Rabbit hole gets deeper when you look at the point of impact of American Airlines on the North Tower. It struck at 95th and 96th floors of the North Tower, both floors occupies by Marsh McLennan one of the largest insurance brokerage firms, with family ties with Kroll Associates. The CEO of McLennan on 9/11 was Jeffery Greenberg , so/o Maurice Greenberg -who was director of NY Federal Reserve for many years and was its chairman between 1994 and 95. Maurice Greenberg was also vice chairman of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). In 1993, Greenber's huge insurance conglomerate,the AIG bankrolled Kroll, there by Kroll became a AIG subsidiary. Kroll had all round access to all the three WTC buildings.

In 1995 the French government expelled several Americans from the country, including a Kroll employee named William Lee, for allegedly spying on French industry. Lee’s involvement with Kroll made French authorities suspicious that his Paris operation might be a CIA front. The French were surely aware of Kroll’s longstanding practice of hiring former CIA, FBI, and British Intelligence agents. Kroll/AIG made no effort to conceal the fact that between 1997-2003 the AIG board of directors included Frank G. Wisner, Jr., son of one of the founders of the CIA. Wisner Jr. is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Wisner Jr. also served as US ambassador to several nations, including Egypt, and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Click here.

Kroll also has good connections with organizations that made huge money from 9/11. Including the defense contractors Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Halliburton, and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). The tenants also had strong connections to the Bush family and their corporate network, including Dresser Industries (now Halliburton) and UBS, and to Deutsche Bank and its subsidiaries, reported to have brokered the insider trading deals. There were also links between these tenant companies and the terrorist-financing Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). Click here.

Murder of FBI agent John O'Neil:

Just prior to the September 11 attacks, Kroll Inc., with the guidance of Jerome Hauer, at the time the Managing director of their Crisis and Consulting Management Group, hired former FBI special investigator John P. O'Neill, who specialized in the Al-Qaeda network held responsible for the 1993 bombing, to head the security at the WTC complex. O'Neill died in the attacks. Click here. O'Neill had been saying that Osama was CIA asset.

Involvement in Benghazi attack:

As if all this is not enough, our Kroll Associated were also involved in Benghazi attack. And Kroll Associated Managing Directors Julieanne Himelstein and John Mazzella Receive Honors for Their Work on the Attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi, Libya- which happened on September 11, 2012. Click Here.

Nick Kroll:

Nick Kroll attacks 9/11 activists on his TV show.

Nick Kroll is the son of Jules Kroll, runs a Netflix series in which he ridicules and attacks 9/11 'truthers.'

(Waiting for more inputs from 9/11 activists. Thank you.)

Rogue, Terrorist and Zionist Pakistan Army: Sex Trade.

2019-01-08T18:55:00.000-08:00

Pakistan Army Generals and Pakistan Leaders are Prostitutes: Sheikh Imran Hossein.

Brief Intro of Wahhabism:

For someone who has no idea of the teachings and fatwas of Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi, the founder of Wahhabism, a heretical sect which impersonates Sunni branch of Islam, it is quite unbelievable- even unimaginable to say that Pakistan Army could be involved in sex trade. An army which calls itself 'Muslim army' and the country which calls itself 'Islamic Republic' could every do something so heinous and inhuman? If you look at the Wahhabi teachings and Wahhabi history, you will find the answer there. According to teachings of Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi, people who go to Shrines and Dargahs of pious and holy men or Sufi saints- are 'Mushrik'. This is one basic pillar of Wahhabi sect, though they have various reasons to call you a Mushrik. Even reciting salawat upon the Holy Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) in the group or in a loud speaker is considered shirk by these extremists. Mushrik is a person who considers something or someone as Allah or similar to Allah or Same (in power or status or existence) as Allah. From times immemorial, since the existence of mankind, people venerate and respect the pious elders of their community in life and in death. But this extremist, narrow minded ideology of Wahhabism teaches that venerating or honoring the dead is same as Shirk. Even in Islam, this thinking is wrong , baseless and this had been the biggest blow to Muslim Ummah (community) in recent times. Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi was a British asset, he was groomed and handled by British secret agency and particularly a British spy named Hempher. In his book, "confessions of a British Spy" Hempher talks about how he had spotted an egoistic, self centered person who thinks he is better than all the Imaams of Islam and how he (Hempher) was able to lure that person into drinking alcohol and committing adultery (through the haraam practice of Muta Nikah).

Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi was used by the British Empire to create a rift in Sunnis and by this, to destroy the great Ottoman Empire. Ibn Abdul Wahhab declared that all those people who visit shrines/dargahs, those who venerate Saints (and based on many such baseless criteria) are Mushrik and their blood is halaal (meaning they can be killed), their women are halaal (meaning they can be raped), their money is halaal (meaning they can be looted), their farms are halaal (meaning the farms can be burnt), their property is halaal (meaning ransacking, looting and occupying their property) is halaal, rather it is the duty of a true Muslim (his followers) to attack and wage war on such Mushrik (rest of the Muslim Ummah). Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi declared that only followers of his narrow minded, misguided, extremist teachings were true Muslims and rest all are Mushriks (polytheists or non-Muslims). Basically Wahhabism teaches its followers that only the followers of their twisted sect are true Muslims and rest all are Mushrik and liable to be killed, raped and looted. This includes all of the Muslim Ummah of that time, because it was a common practice of both Sunnis and Shias to visit shrines/dargahs and venerate holy men who are dead. And this is what exactly the ISIS, Al Qaeda, Al Nusra etc terrorists are doing in Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yemen.

Manzoor Pashteen of PTM talks about Army-Taliban Nexus.

Sex trade by Pakistan Army:

And this is what the ISI, Pakistan Army and their trained Taliban terrorists are doing in Pakistan, Afghanistan and to some extent in Kashmir (both sides of the border). The Army Generals of Pakistan Army have time and again openly declared that they had indeed trained the Mujahideen with the help of US and Arab countries to fight the Soviet Union. All these so called Mujahideen were actually followers of Wahhabi ideology and they were recruited from all over the world, especially from the Arab world, Pashtoon belt of Pakistan and from some pockets of Afghanistan. Afghanistan and the Pashtoons living in Pakistan are generally very conservative and follow the Sufi sect of Sunni branch. In fact today what they call as 'Sufis' are the real orthodox Sunnis, there were no Wahhabi, Deobandi, Ahle Hadees, Ahmadi/Qadiani etc etc sects in Sunni Islam 100 or 150 years ago. There were only Sunnis (Sufis) and Shias. All the sects in Sunni branch of Islam that we see today were created by the Anglo-American Intelligence and even today, these intelligence agencies fund them, train them and supply them with weapons. This is a big global game plan to defame Islam, break up and implode it from within and also to attack Islamic countries by showing these terrorists as an excuse. It is hard to look at Wahhabism as an isolated abomination coming out of Islam, rather it is a global phenomena of heretic sects that came out of Islam in the past 200 years or so. We can not ignore the fact that Wahhabism and Zionism are strongly linked. This is further bolstered by the fact that Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi had accepted the idea of formation of separate Jewish State carved out of Palestine. He had given this in writing to the British.

Pashtoon Activist Umar Daud talks about Pakistan Army involvement in Sex Trade.

Coming back to Pakistan Army, they have been addicted to the dollars that the US gives them. In fact the Pakistan Army is in total control of Saudi-Wahhabi Ideology and they are addicted to the US dollars- which is a very deadly combination. Pakistan Army has been waging a fake war in Pashtoon belt (Waziristan, Swat and other Pashtoon areas bordering Afghanistan) and in Balochistan. They attack the Pashtoon tribal areas, evacuate the people, bomb their homes and markets, loot their property, bulldoze their homes. When the poor Pashtoon tribals come back to heir localities after the 'operation' has finished, to their horror, they find the Taliban terrorists occupying their markets and homes. The very terrorists which the Army is supposedly fighting. To the dismay and shock of the tribal people, they find the Taliban terrorist leaders staying in Army camps, visiting Army officials and traveling in Army vehicles, by passing the check posts. This is the reason why, till now, no terrorist leader was either killed or arrested in these operations or at these check posts. The check posts encircling the tribal areas is a different story, where people are insulted, abused, women disrespected, people have to go through vulgar language and indecent behavior multiple times a day, each and every day. While the terrorists for whom the check posts are supposedly set up, roam freely in the army vehicles.

Recently reports have surfaced from these war torn tribal areas where the Pakistan Army picks up Pashtoon girls, rape them and sell them in brothel houses of Lahore and from there, these women are exported around the world for money. In fact, people familiar with his situation say that this has become a means of income for the Pakistan army. Some women are gifted to the terrorists who are fighting in Arab or in Afghanistan. It is done by the Wahhabi elements in the ISI and Army for whom such inhuman activities are 'halaal'. These Wahhabi elements are the really policy makers of the Army and control the entire army. These people are highly connected and no one can touch them. They have links with powerful elements in US and western secret establishments. Moreover after bulldozing and clearing the localities, they set up terrorist camps in those areas. The tribal elders who dare to speak against these terrorists or the Army officials who are involved, are beheaded. All the features of the terrorists we see in Syria, can be found in these ISI terrorists.

Senator Gul Naseeb Khan talks about the true face of Pakistan Army.

Note: There is no concrete evidence or Official documents to support the allegations that Pakistan Army as an institution or as a policy is involved in sex trade for money. But by listening to the news, statements of victims of these war torn tribal areas, by connecting the dots and using common sense, we have come to the conclusion that Pakistan Army (or the deep secret elements of it) might well be involved in the heinous crime of sex trade for making money and for supplying women for the terrorists fighting in other countries. Purpose of this blog is not to defame anybody rather the purpose of this blog is to be the voice of the oppressed and the voiceless.

Revisiting 9/11- The Israeli Connection- Larry Silverstein- The guy who made 4.6 Billion USD out of 9/11 attacks.

2019-01-07T19:46:00.001-08:00

9 September, 2001, was an unforgettable day in the recent history of world, especially the Muslim world. For the first time we Muslims realized how ugly the Wahhabi extremists could get. People realized how important it was to isolate this heretic sect of Wahhabism which has always created problems for Muslims and for humanity. 15 of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, which is the head quarters of Wahhabi sect. But the story does not stop here. There is much more sinister going on. The Wahhabis were not working alone, it was a large network, a much more diverse and powerful group of men who were supporting these terrorists. Like the water under the carpet, these secret network of criminal satanists started spreading their ugly ideology all around the world.

As we know the Wahhabi sect was created by British Intelligence to break apart the Ottoman empire. The British secret agencies were the handlers of Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi (the one who created the wahhabi sect.) This bond is being carried forward even today. How come 15 Saudi citizens were involved in the 9/11 attack and no action was taken against Saudi Arabia till date. Instead poor country of Afghanistan was razed to ground and Iraq was sent to stone ages on lame excuses build up on lies. The Wahhabi terrorists who carried out this attack had support from other forces within the US and from outside, from US allies, including Israel and Pakistan. Most of the Americans do not find the official story of 9/11 to be credible. Many NGOs and associations of pilots, intellectuals, patriots, army veterans, engineers etc have sprung up to demand the government for independent inquiry into 9/11 attacks.

Recently a hacking group named 'Dark overlord' has emerged into the scene claiming that they have a lot of secret 9/11 files and documents and they would release them to the world. Mostly such gimmicks are done by the establishment themselves. The documents would ultimately incriminate some opponents of the NeoCon-Zionist group in the end. But it is worth noting that 9/11 fails to die off. Mystery of 9/11 still lingers in minds of people. People still have unanswered questions about 9/11.

Considering the topic we have selected for today, let us start with a prominent Zionist figure who was the owner of the Twin Towers when the attack was carried out.

Larry Silverstein:

Aged 87 years, Larry is a Jewish American businessman from New York. Larry obtained 99 year lease on the entire 9/11 complex on 24 July 2001. Asked why he bought the Twin Towers, Larry had said that he had felt an 'compelling urge' to own them. Even though he was hospitalized in a car accident, he rushed to close the deal and bought the Twin Towers in a hurry. The deal also gave him the right to build new Towers if the old ones get destroyed. Silverstein immediately drew up new insurance policies for the Towers.

Larry was paid a little over 4.5 billion USD in insurance money as a result of the destruction of WTC complex. He actually demanded double the insurance money claiming that there were 2 towers. Not satisfied by selling off of the steel and debris of the twin towers, Larry has now sued again for 12.5 billion USD, claiming that the Arilines and Airport security (by the way, the airport security was under a private Israeli security company) were not able to stop the terrorist attack.

Larry used to have breakfast meeting at the "Windows on the World" restaurant located in the North Tower 107 th floor, every morning at 8 am. But on 9/11/2001 he was absent for the meeting. Even his children, who work at the Twin Towers took off that day. When he was as asked "where were you on 9/11." He explained he was home and that his wife had booked an appointment with the dermatologist for him that day- and the appointment was cancelled later. Asked about his children, he said they were 'on the way' and would have been an hour or so late to work than their usual timings.

Larry's friends:

Our Larry has some very powerful friends. First and foremost is Benjamen Natanyahu. Yes the same Benjamen Natanyahu who had said "9/11 was good for Israel." Former Israeli president Ariel Sharon and Media mogul Rupert Murdoch are other good friends of Mr. Larry.

Larry's Infamous Incriminating "Pull it" remark:

Look at this lying piece of shit when he is asked "where were you that morning."

Talking on a TV show in an interview, Larry said that he asked the rescue workers to "Pull It" regarding the WTC 7 or the third tower. "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna able to contain the fire. I said, 'we've such a terrible loss of life, may be the smartest thing to do is to pull it and they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.'"

Later Larry said that what he meant by "Pull it"was for the firefighters to withdraw or evacuate. But there is a problem with this explanation. The next thing Larry says after he utters "pull it" is "we watched the building collapse."

Pull it... And we saw the building coming down

The term “pull” is also used later in the same PBS documentary by a Ground Zero cleanup worker, who said of WTC 6, “It’s not every day you try to pull down an eight-story building with cables.” However,. . . this procedure is different from using explosives to destroy a much taller building. So 'Pull' does refer to bringing down a building in a controlled demolition.

Not just that, FEMA report on WTC 7 says that "No Manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY (New York City Fire department.). Refer to Chapter 5.6.1 in this FEMA report.

Assistant Chief Frank Fellini, the fire commander in charge of that area had ordered firefighters to evacuate fr safety reasons at around 11:30 am. And a 'Collapse Zone' was established. Establishing a Collapse zone means suspending search and rescue operations and getting ready for the collapse. But WTC 7 collapsed at 5.20 pm in the evening.

Ardent religious defender of official 9/11 story, Jeffery Scott Shapiro of the FOX news, in his article 'Shame on Jesse Ventura' states that Larry Silverstein had requested his insurance company if they would allow him to control demolish WTC 7. Quoting from his article- " Shortly before the building collapse, several NYPD officers and Con-Edson workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of 'One World Financial Center' was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building- since its foundations were already unstable and expected to fall."

After collapse of Twin Towers, which Larry had bought just 2 months before the attack, Larry made over 4.5 billion dollars and is claiming 12.5 billion dollars more in another law suit. Instead he should have been arrested and investigated for all the evidences that point a finger at his involvement in this attack which killed innocent people and has triggered so many wars all over the world. No wonder this dirty blood sucker is called 'Lucky' Larry.

Debunking the Hadith of Constantinople and exposing Yazid (lanatullah alaih)

2019-01-05T17:10:00.000-08:00

Many so called "Islamic scholars" have emerged recently, who try to prove that Yazid was Jannati (nauzubillah). In fact these ignorant, dishonest people belong to the extremist terrorist ideology of Wahhabism. These people have the backing of oil rich monarchies, who have been hand in glove with the Anglo-American empire in destabilizing and imploding Islam from within. First these people were able to get rid of Ottoman Empire and the Khilafat, then they started spreading their poison in the name of 'pure religion' and 'tauheed' all over the world, through their donations and with the tactical support from Anglo-American intelligence agencies. In Indian Subcontinent, the Wahhabi sect is represented by ignorant, arrogant and extremist people who call themselves as 'Ahle Hadees' and the Deobandis. Evangelical TV preacher, Zakir Naik also belongs to this extremist sect. Thanks to Allah that Zakir Naik is banned in India.

Point by point rebuttal of the New Fitnah/Firqa by name of Ahle Hadith (Wahhabi) who love Yazid (lanatullah alaih)

The topic of Yazid (lanatullah alaih) has been one of the key points of debates and clashes between the orthodox Sufi-Sunnis and the new deviant sects like Wahhabism and Ahle Hadees. The children of Yazid (Ahle hadees and other deviant firqas) present the following Hadith in defense of their father Yazid (lanatullah alaih):

The Hadith:

Hadith giving glad tidings of Maghfirat and Jannah do not mention 'Constantinople'. Constantinople's conquest and maghfirat of that army is mentioned in hadiths concerned with Akhir uz zaman, i.e during Imam Mahdi's era.

Narrated Khalid bin Madan:

That 'Umair bin Al-Aswad Al-Anasi told him that he went to 'Ubada bin As-Samit while he was staying in his house at the sea-shore of Hims with (his wife) Um Haram. 'Umair said. Um Haram informed us that she heard the Prophet saying, "Paradise is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition." Um Haram added, I said, 'O Allah's Apostle! Will I be amongst them?' He replied, 'You are amongst them.' The Prophet then said, 'The first army amongst' my followers who will invade Caesar's City will be forgiven their sins.' I asked, 'Will I be one of them, O Allah's Apostle?' He replied in the negative." - Sahih Bukhari, Vol IV, Book 52, Number 175.

So, according to this Hadith here are two glad tidings from Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ):

Those (army) who undertake the first naval expedition would attain Jannah (paradise).
The army which first invades Caesar's city (could be any city of Qaider, Constantinople not mentioned- Watch the video of Tahir ul Qadri given above) will be forgiven (of all the sins).

We shall prove that Yazid (lanatullah alaih) does not belong to both categories.

Yazid was not in the first Naval expedition:

Muslim army undertook their first naval expedition in the era of Usman Ghani (ra). It was around 27 to 33 Hijri. The second expedition was conducted in 52 to 58 hijri. Both the expeditions were carried out by Hazrat Muawiyah (ra) by permission from Hazrat Usman Ghani (ra). It is impossible for Yazid to have participated in the first Naval expedition, because his date of birth is 26th Hijri and he was 34 years old in 60 hijri when the Karbala massacre happened.

Yazid was not in second expedition willingly:

The second expedition was conducted by Amir Muawiyah (ra) and ordered his son (Yazid) to join it but Yazid remained heedless, adamant and made lame excuses. That army faced calamities and suffered from famine and disease. When Yazid came to know about it, he wrote this couplet; "I do not care if armies are suffering from hardships and troubles, I am enjoying the company of Umm e Kalsoom on a high throne, reclining on a cushion in deer meeran." When Amir Muawiyah came to know this, he swore to send Yazid to Sufiyan bin Auf (who was leading the expedition), so that Yazid could get his share in troubles. Yazid was sent in the second small batch.

Source: Tareekh Kamil- Ibn e Aseer, Vol 3, Page 458-459.

This second expedition was successful and was victorious. But Yazid can not be counted amongt the 'forgiven ones' because he was not in the war willingly. Any ibadat or amal of a person is only acceptable in the court of Allah when he does it willingly and with sincerity. No deed can be acceptable in the court of Allah which is done unwillingly and without any sincerity. Also any glad tidings Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) might have foretold, is strictly conditional- as in, the person should not have turned apostate later, and he should have participated in the amal with sincerity and not for show off or under someone else's influence or with some other intention other than pleasing Allah and His Rasool(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) .

The Sanad of this Hadith are not trustworthy:

The Sanad of This Hadith is Filled with Kadiri heretics and Nasbis.

The sanad (chain of narration) has some narrators who belonged to deviant sects and haters of Ahle Bayt and Hazrat Ali(ra). Bukhari got this hadith from Ishaq Bin Yaid Damishqi, who got it from Yahya Bin Hamza, who in turn got it from Thawr (Saur) Bin Yazid, who got it from Khalid Bin Madan, who got it from Umar Bin Aswad Asni, who ultimately got it from Umm e Haram, who had (supposedly) hear it from Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ).

Narrators of this Hadith are all Syrians and loyalists of the Umayyad Clan, who were the rulers for long time (Muawiyah (ra) and Yazid and their dynasty).
The source of this hadith is only one person- Umm e Haram. No one else reported this hadith. looking at how important this hadith is- tidings of paradise and maghfirat- how come his hadith was not famous with multiple sources and narrators.
Why didn't Rasool Allah (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) tell this hadith to his close Sahaba or His (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) wives? Common sense says that such a Hadith should have been famous with the male sahaba, to encourage them and boost their morale to undertake naval expeditions and to attack Constantinople. Instead this hadith is kept secret and told only to one woman sahabiya. Does it make any sense?
Thawr (Saur) Bin Yazid (one of the chain of narrators) was a Nazbi (one who hates Ahle Bayt and Hazrat Ali(ra)): Ibn Saad (Sunni Imam) writes about Thawr (Saur)- "The ancestors of Yazid were fighting along with Muawiyah (ra) against Hazrat Ali (ra) in the battle of Siffin and they were killed in this war. whenever this Thawr used to hear the name of Ali (ra), he used to say "I dont like to hear the name of that person who killed my ancestors.""- Tabaqat Ibn Saad, Vol 7, under the topic: Thawr Bin Yazid al Kalayee.
Yahya Ibn Mueen (authentic Sunni author in the field of Rajal)states "This Thawr(Saur) was included in that party which used to curse Hazrat Ali(ra)."
Hafiz Ibn Hajar Asqalani, the great Imam of Ahle Sunnat in his Tehzeeb ul Tehzeeb part II, Page 33 states that Yahya Ibn Moin said that Yahya Ibn Hamza was from Kadiri sect (the heretics who reject fate and destiny-which is important part of faith for Muslims.)

Note: Yahya Ibn Moin was the teacher and Sheikh of Bukhari, Waqi Ibn Jirah was the teacher of Yahya Ibn Moin and the teacher and Sheikh of Waqi Ibn Jirah was Imam e Azam Abu Hanifa (ra). Strange that the Wahhabis follow Bukhari but reject the teacher of his teachers, Imam Abu Hanifa. How come a student who comes generations after Imam Abu Hanifa, has more knowledge than his masters' master?

Note: Imam Malik never used to narrate Hadith from Thawr (Saur) Ibn Yazeed.

Sahaba Ikram did not know about this Hadith:

Hazrat Abu Bakr(ra) didn't send any army against Constantinople:

Even after such glad tidings and such a great status this Hadith promises, Abu Bakr(ra) and Umar (ra) did not show any interest in neither naval expeditions nor attack on Constantinople. In his two and half years of Khilafat, Hazrat Abu Bakr (ra) did not show any interest to pursue and fulfill the prophecy of this Hadith, while he sent entire people of Madina in the Ridda wars to crush the apostasy. How come Abu Bakr (ra) did not know about this Hadith and never tried to attack nor atleast prepare a plan to attack Constantinople.

Umar (ra) rejected requests by Muawiyah (ra) to give permission to attack Constantinople:

Hazrat Umar (ra) had rejected repeated requests by Muawiyah (ra) for permission to attack Constantinople through a Naval expedition.

After Abu Bakr(ra), there was a long Khilafat period of Hazrat umar (ra) of 10 years, in which expeditions were launched all across the land. Khilafat of Umar(ra) reached over vast areas, various countries and continents were under his command. But even He, never sent any naval expedition to attack Constantinople. Why? Even Hazrat Umar(ra) was unaware of this Hadith? Why didnt Hazrat Umar (ra) try to capture Constantinople of there were such great glad tidings and high status declared for the army which launched first naval expedition against Constantinople?

On requests by Muawiyah (ra) to allow him to launch a naval attack on Constantinople, Hazrat Umar(ra) asked Amr bin Al -'As(ra) "Describe the sea and the seafarer to me, for I am uneasy about it." Amr bin Al-'As replied and gave a bad picture of the sea. When Umar (ra) read the reply, he wrote to Muawiyah (ra) "No, by Allah who sent Mohammad (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) with truth, I shall never send any Muslim there."- According to Ubaidah and Khalid, written in History of Tabari, Vol 16, events of 28th Hijri.

On repeated persistence by Muawiyah (ra) to let him attack Constantinople through a Naval route, Umar (ra) admonished Muawiyah (ra) "....How then can I bring the troops to this troublesome being (ocean)? By God, one Muslim is dearer to me than all that the Byzantines possess. Take care not to oppose me. I have given you a command, you know what Al-Ala' bin al Hadrami encountered at my hands. And I did not give him such categorical orders."

Had Umar (ra) knew this hadith, would he not rush his armies into naval fleets and attack Constantinople?

Hazrath Usman Ghani (ra) allows Muawiyah (ra) for the naval expeditions, but after 4 years of persuasion. Even then, Hazrat Usman Ghani (ra) orders "Do not conscript the people or cast lots among them. Let them decide for themselves , whoever chooses to go or not." Usman (ra) orders not to force people to go for the expedition and let the people volunteer and choose by themselves. Had Usman (ra) knew this Hadith, he would not have given such an order, instead he would have ordered the expedition himself and the Sahaba would recruit each other citing this Hadith and no one would have left behind in Madina.

Source: A Chronology Of Islamic History 570-1000 CE, By H.U. Rahman, 1999, Pages 48-49.
The Great Arab Conquests By Hugh Kennedy, page 326.

No mention of 'Paradise' in the same hadith taken from other Hadith books:
So definitely this Hadith was not known to the Sahaba, except one Umm e Haram(ra). If you read this hadith from other sources of Hadith, Umm e Haram(ra) narrated this same hadith to her Nephew Uns Bin Malik, there is no mention of paradise, yet when we read Bukhari, she narrates a non-mahram about the blessings of Paradise.

Conclusion:

Apart from the proofs from the study of Hadith and History, a Mo'min does not need any of this, common sense of a Muslim is enough to understand that Yazid is a Jahannami (hell dweller). First and foremost, his unpardonable sin was the shahadat of Imam Hussain (ra), the beloved Grandson of Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ). How can a Muslim ever hurt Rasool Allah (saw)?

After the sin of Karbala, Yazid attacked Makkah and catapults were used here to attack the Holy Kaba. Madina was ransacked. Thousands of Sahaba were killed in Madina, women were raped, Masjid un Nabawi was desecrated, horses were tied in Masjid un Nabawi and Salah was banned for a number of days. This is more than enough proof the conclude that Yazid (lanatullah alaih) is not just a fasiq but a Kaafir indeed.

Heros of Islam: Sultan Nooruddin Zhangi (ra).

2019-01-04T09:28:00.000-08:00

Intro: Sultan Nooruddin Zhangi.

Birth: 1118 AD.
Father: Imaduddin Zengi. Assassinated in 1146. Nooruddin (ra) was his second son.
Dynasty/Tribe: Oghuz Turkish Zengid dynasty.
Reigned: from 1146 to 1174 AD- over Aleppo,Damascus.
Known by the west as: A nightmare for the Crusaders.
Known by the Muslim world for: Had seen Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) in dreams- thrice in the same night. Was ordered by Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) to punish the 2 Munafiq people who were digging a tunnel to the Holy Rodha of Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ).
Achievements: Consolidating Muslim kingdoms of Syria, Egypt and Mosul to fight against the Crusaders. Protecting Rodha E Rasool (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) from the 2 munafiqs who were digging a tunnel. Training and Mentoring Salahuddin Ayyubi, who later became the biggest Muslim name in the modern Islamic History.
Death: 15th May 1174 ad, aged 56 years.

Zengid dynasty

The Holy Prophet(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) in the Blessed Dream:

It was the night of 1162 AD, Sultan Nooruddin Zhangi(ra) had just finished his Tahajjud prayers and slept. He saw the Holy Prophet (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) in the dream, 2 more faces were shown to Sultan, and Rasool Allah (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) said "Save me from the mischief of these men." The Sultan woke up, he was disturbed, he did his wadhu and performed 2 rakah nafl salah and went back to bed. The same dream repeated once again. This happened 3 times. The third time, Sultan was anxious and called his Minister and narrated everything. They came to a conclusion that some extraordinary situation is about to happen in Madina.

Holy dream and the command from Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ)

So the Sultan takes a handful of riders and leave for Madina. He picks up fastest horses and travels nonstop, covering the distance of 20-25 days in 16 days. On reaching Madina, he invited the people for a feast and gave them gifts. He watched each man carefully but he could not find the 2 faces which were shown to him in the dream. Sultan called the Amir of Madina and inquired "did everyone come?" the Amir told him that all had come to the feast except 2 men who were very 'pious' and 'generous', who are always busy in prayers and alms giving (This is an indication to the future generations that you should never judge a person from him outward amaal, and that in the future, there are going to be munafiq enemies of Islam who would perform all the prayers and rituals of the religion perfectly.) Sultan ordered the two people to come forward. On inquiring, they told the Sultan that they had come to Hijaz to perform Hajj but settled in Madina. Sultan took them and visited their house. For the shock and dismay of the people, they found an underground tunnel when the Sultan lifted the carpet of their house. The tunnel was going right into Rodha e Rasool(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ). These criminals had conspired to steal the Holy Body of Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ), but little had they known that Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) knows what is transpiring around the world. The Sultan beheaded the two criminals then and there.

A big trench was dug encircling the Holy Rodha and molten lead was poured into it. It is said that they dug the trench until water came out, i.e, the trench was so deep. So that no one would imagine of doing something like this in future.

Then the Sultan tore his short and ran in the streets of Madina crying out loudly "Oh Rasool Allah(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ), out of all the kings and Nobles, out of all the eminent people, you (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) selected me for this job."

Why Nooruddin Zhangi(ra):

Why did Rasool Allah (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) choose Sultan Nooruddin for the task?

Out of all the great Scholars, Kings, Nobles, Governors and Rulers of that time, why did Rasool Allah (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) select Nooruddin Zhangi to save his holy Rodha?

Sulran Nooruddin Zhangi is a Islamic Scholar. He built many Madrasssas (around 42 according to some reports) and around half of these Madrassas were built with his own money. He was a staunch sunni. In Nov 1148, he forbade Azaan from Shia Masjids in Aleppo and also the public display of Shi'ism. He built many rest places for the travelers. He was generous in charity. He lived a very simple and modest life. He used to respect and venerate Darvesh and Sufis.

Sultan Nooruddin had 2 kurdish generals under him, Ayyub and Shirqo. After the death of his father, Imaduddin, Ayyub's son, Salahuddin helped Nooruddin in his military expeditions and in establishing his authority in Damascus. Later Salahuddin was appointed as the governor of Damascus. Nooruddin played very important role in guiding and mentoring Salahuddin. Salahuddin became the legendary Salahuddin Ayyubi by following the path laid down by Nooruddin Zhangi.

William Tyre (Biographer) says "He (Nooruddin) is a just prince, valiant and wise and acoording to the traditions of his race,a religious man."

Sir Steven Ruciman said that he loved, above all else, Justice.

In 1162, after returning from pilgrimage to Makkah, he found out about the death of King Baldwin 3 of jerusalem and out of respect for his opponent, he refrained from attacking the Crusader Kingdom (Jerusalem). William Tyre reports, Sultan Nooruddin said "We should sympathize with their grief and in pity spare them, because they have lost a prince such as the rest of the world foes not possess today."

Nightmare for the Crusaders- The Wrath of Sultan Nooruddin Zhangi:

Wahhabi Scholar Ibn Katheer praises Sultan Nooruddin (ra).

As much a soft hearted and gentle man he was with the religious scholars and elders, Sultan Nooruddin was a ferocious warrior and a nightmare for the enemies of Islam. The Crusaders would avoid direct clashes with Sultan Nooruddin Zhangi.

After death of his father, Nooruddin and his elder brother Saifuddin Ghazi divided the kingdom, Nooruddin got Aleppo, Saifuddin became governor of Mosul. After the death of Saifuddin, their younger brother Qutbuddin Maudud became the ruler of Mosul and he recognized Sultan Nooruddin as the overlord of Mosul. Thus Nooruddin became the ruler of Mosul also.

1144: Soon after taking control of the kingdom, Sultan Nooruddin attacked the Principality of Antioch, siezing several castles in North of Syria and at the same time defeated an attempt by Joscelin 2 to recover the 'County of Edessa' which had conquered by Zhangi earlier. Note that Nooruddin only attacked those Castles and Kingdoms which were engaged in Crusades, the Sultan never invaded areas under Byzantine control as the Byzantines were not hostile to Muslims.

1146: Defeated the frankish attempt to reoccupy Edessa by Joscelin.

1147: Bilateral treaty with Moinuddin, governor of Damascus and married his daughter Ismatuddin Khatun. Together, Nooruddin and Moinuddin reconquered Basra and Salkhad which had been occupied by Altantash, a rebel of Moinuddin.

1148: Second crusade arrived in Syria led by Louis VII of France and Conrad III of Germany attacked Damascus and was defeated. Nuruddin then attacked Antioch.

1149: Battle of Inab- Crushed Raymond of Poiters and secured hold on Antioch. Captured the Castle of Inab. Raymond was killed in the battle. His head was sent to the Khalifa in Baghdad. In the same year, Moinuddin died and his son Mujiruddin became the ruler of Damascus. He joined hands with the Crusaders. When Ascalon was captured by the Crusaders in 1153, Mujiruddin forbade Nooruddin to travel across his territory. In 1154, Nooruddin defeated and overthrew Mujiruddin with the help of local population if Damascus city. Salahuddin was appointed as the governor of Damascus.

1150: Defeated Joscelin II for a final time along with Saljuk Sultan of Rum, Mas'ud (whose daughter he married). Joscelin was imprisoned and he died in the prison in Aleppo in 1159.

1152: Sultan Nooruddin captured Tortosa.

1157: Besieged the Knights Hospitallers in the Crusade Fortress of Banias. A relief army was sent from Jerusalem by King Baldwin III, but it was defeated and the Grand Master Bertrand de Blanquefort was captured.

1159: Treaty with Byzantine Emperor Manuel I Comnenus, Sultan respected him.

1160: Sultan Nooruddin captured Prince of Antioch, Raynald of Chatillon after a raid in the Anti-Taurus mountains. Raynald remained in captivity for 16 years.

1162: Pilgrimage to Makkah.

Egypt annexed in staged from 1169 to 71.

Death:

15 May 1174, at the age of 56. He fell sick with high fever and the cause of his death is said to be a Peri-Tonsillar abscess. He had a broad smile on his face when he died. Sultan Nooruddin Zhangi is buried in the Al Nooruddin Madrassa at Damascus. The life of Sultan Nooruddin Zhangi (ra) gives us a fresh breath of Imaan in our dead hearts, even to this day.

Rest in Peace oh Friend of Allah.

Savarkar, the 'Prodigal Son' of British Empire: Not so 'Veer' afterall.

2019-01-02T18:05:00.002-08:00

'India first' had become the slogan for BJP during the 2014 general elections. But what does that mean really. For RSS and sangh parivar, India means a Hindu Rashtra, not the India we have today. Recently Narendra Modi visited the Cell in which Savarkar was jailed. An airport had been named after Savarkar by Advani. But what nobody wants to talk about is the begging mercy petition Savarkar had written to the British government, not once but several times. So now we have to think, when the Sangh says "India first" what does it mean? For Sangh, 'India' means 'Hindu Rashtra' and that is where their loyalties lie, they would do anything to attain that objective. They are not really interested in the constitution of India.

In May 1904, Savarkar started the Abhinav Bharat (Young India) Society drawing inspiration from Giuseppe Mazzini's Giovanni Italia (Young Italy) Society. While in England, he founded the Free Indian Society with a commitment to overthrowing British rule in India. After a member of the Free Indian Society killed an official in India Office (London), Savarkar was arrested and transported to the Andamans for life imprisonment. He reached the Andamans in 1910. He appealed for clemency in 1911, and again in 1913 during Sir Reginald Craddock's visit.

Savarkar vs Bhagat Singh:

Savarkar was sent to the notorious Cellular Jail in the Andamans in 1911 for his revolutionary activity, Savarkar first petitioned the British for early release within months of beginning his 50 year sentence. Then again in 1913 and several times till he was finally transferred to a mainland prison in 1921 before his final release in 1924. The burden of his petitions: let me go and I will give up the fight for independence and be loyal to the colonial government. On one side there was Bhagat Sigh, who had requested the British government to send a military division to execute him and on the other side there was father of today's so called 'Hindu Nationalists' who was begging the British to let him free.

To be frank, Bhagat Singh was never respected by the leaders of Hindutva ideology. Here we should remember that though it was the British colonial powers who hanged them, there were at the time organisations like Hindu Mahasabha, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Muslim League in pre-1947 India which not only remained alien to the ideals of these revolutionaries but also maintained a criminal silence on their hanging.

It is both comic, ironical and shocking therefore that, of these three communal outfits, it is the RSS -- which consciously kept itself completely aloof from the anti-colonial struggle –that has, of late, laid claim to the tradition and contributions of these great revolutionaries. Literature is being produced and the discourse too seeks to appropriate them with false a-historic linkages to Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev.

Both Hedgewar (RSS chief 1925-40) and Golwalkar (1940-73), were opposed to the united freedom movement as its goal was an all-inclusive India. Golwalkar denounced the freedom struggle (Bunch of Thoughts, 1966, RSS publication) as "territorial nationalism" which "had deprived us of the positive and inspiring content of our real Hindu Nationhood and made many of the ‘freedom movements’ virtually anti-British movements". It was this ideological commitment to building Hindu rashtr in India that apart from Hedgewar who went to jail as Congressman, Golwalkar, Deendayal Upadhyaya (prominent RSS cadre since 1937) and LK Advani (RSS activist since 1942) never participated in the freedom struggle." Click here.

There is ample proof available in the documents of the RSS that establish the reality that the RSS denounced movements led by revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekar Azad and their associates. Here is a passage from Bunch of Thoughts—collection of speeches and writings of second RSS sarsanghchalak MS Golwalkar— treated as a holy book by the RSS cadres—decrying the whole tradition of martyrs:

“There is no doubt that such men who embrace martyrdom are great heroes and their philosophy too is pre-eminently manly. They are far above the average men who meekly submit to fate and remain in fear and inaction. All the same, such persons are not held up as ideals in our society. We have not looked upon their martyrdom as the highest point of greatness to which men should aspire. For, after all, they failed in achieving their ideal, and failure implies some fatal flaw in them.”

Golwalkar goes on to tell the RSS cadres that only those people should be adored who have been successful in their lives. “It is obvious that those who were failures in life must have had some serious drawback in them. How can one, who is defeated, give light and lead others to success?”

Thus, according to Golwalkar’s philosophy of life, since Bhagat Singh and his companions did not succeed in achieving their goal, they did not deserve any respect too. According to his formula the British rulers would be the natural object of worship as they won and were able to kill revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh. It is difficult to find a statement more insulting and denigrating to the martyrs of the Indian freedom movement than this. Click here.

Text of the Clemency Petition will make you hang your head in shame, if you are a real patriot:

Text of Savarkar’s mercy petition to the British

The following 'Mercy Petition' has been reproduced from RC Majumdar's book PENAL SETTLEMENTS IN ANDAMANS (pp. 211-213) published by the Department of Culture, Government of India, in 1975. Interestingly, RC Majumdar is regarded by the Hindutva camp as a true Hindu historian. (Shamsul Islam).

Petition from V D Savarkar (Convict No. 32778) to the Home Member of the Government of India, dated the 14th November, 1913.
“I beg to submit the following points for your kind consideration:
(1) When I came here in 1911 June, I was along with the rest of the convicts of my party taken to the office of the Chief Commissioner. There I was classed as "D" meaning dangerous prisoner; the rest of the convicts were not classed as "D". Then I had to pass full 6 months in solitary confinement. The other convicts had not. During that time I was put on the coir pounding though my hands were bleeding. Then I was put on the oil-mill - the hardest labour in the jail. Although my conduct during all the time was exceptionally good still at the end of these six months I was not sent out of the jail; though the other convicts who came with me were. From that time to this day I have tried to keep my behaviour as good as possible.

(2) When I petitioned for promotion I was told I was a special class prisoner and so could not be promoted. When any of us asked for better food or any special treatment we were told "You are only ordinary convicts and must eat what the rest do". Thus Sir, Your Honour would see that only for special disadvantages we are classed as special prisoners.

(3) When the majority of the casemen were sent outside I requested for my release. But, although I had been cased (caned?) hardly twice or thrice and some of those who were released, for a dozen and more times, still I was not released with them because I was their casemen. But when after all, the order for my release was given and when just then some of the political prisoners outside were brought into the troubles I was locked in with them because I was their casemen.

(4) If I was in Indian jails I would have by this time earned much remission, could have sent more letters home, got visits. If I was a transportee pure and simple I would have by this time been released, from this jail and would have been looking forward for ticket-leave, etc. But as it is, I have neither the advantages of the Indian jail nor of this convict colony regulation; though had to undergo the disadvanatges of both.

(5) Therefore will your honour be pleased to put an end to this anomalous situation in which I have been placed, by either sending me to Indian jails or by treating me as a transportee just like any other prisoner. I am not asking for any preferential treatment, though I believe as a political prisoner even that could have been expected in any civilized administration in the Independent nations of the world; but only for the concessions and favour that are shown even to the most depraved of convicts and habitual criminals? This present plan of shutting me up in this jail permanently makes me quite hopeless of any possibility of sustaining life and hope. For those who are term convicts the thing is different, but Sir, I have 50 years staring me in the face! How can I pull up moral energy enough to pass them in close confinement when even those concessions which the vilest of convicts can claim to smoothen their life are denied to me? Either please to send me to Indian jail for there I would earn (a) remission; (b) would have a visit from my people come every four months for those who had unfortunately been in jail know what a blessing it is to have a sight of one's nearest and dearest every now and then! (c) and above all a moral - though not a legal - right of being entitled to release in 14 years; (d) also more letters and other little advantages. Or if I cannot be sent to India I should be released and sent outside with a hope, like any other convicts, to visits after 5 years, getting my ticket leave and calling over my family here. If this is granted then only one grievance remains and that is that I should be held responsible only for my own faults and not of others. It is a pity that I have to ask for this - it is such a fundamental right of every human being! For as there are on the one hand, some 20 political prisoners - young, active and restless, and on the other the regulations of a convict colony, by the very nature of them reducing the liberties of thought and expression to lowest minimum possible; it is but inevitable that every now and then some one of them will be found to have contravened a regulation or two and if all be held responsible for that, as now it is actually done - very little chance of being left outside remains for me.

In the end may I remind your honour to be so good as to go through the petition for clemency, that I had sent in 1911, and to sanction it for being forwarded to the Indian Government? The latest development of the Indian politics and the conciliating policy of the government have thrown open the constitutional line once more. Now no man having the good of India and Humanity at heart will blindly step on the thorny paths which in the excited and hopeless situation of India in 1906-1907 beguiled us from the path of peace and progress. Therefore if the government in their manifold beneficence and mercy release me, I for one cannot but be the staunchest advocate of constitutional progress and loyalty to the English government which is the foremost condition of that progress. As long as we are in jails there cannot be real happiness and joy in hundreds and thousands of homes of His Majesty's loyal subjects in India, for blood is thicker than water; but if we be released the people will instinctively raise a shout of joy and gratitude to the government, who knows how to forgive and correct, more than how to chastise and avenge. Moreover my conversion to the constitutional line would bring back all those misled young men in India and abroad who were once looking up to me as their guide. I am ready to serve the Government in any capacity they like, for as my conversion is conscientious so I hope my future conduct would be. By keeping me in jail nothing can be got in comparison to what would be otherwise. The Mighty alone can afford to be merciful and therefore where else can the prodigal son return but to the parental doors of the Government?
Hoping your Honour will kindly take into notion these points.” Click Here.

Even after reading the language and tone of this letter, Sangh fans still try to justify Savarkar. They say he was actually fooling the British into freeing him, so that he could carryout his work as before. But the fact of the matter is, after Savarkar got out of the jail, he started working for the British and stayed away from all freedom struggles and activities. Savarkar and other Hindutva leaders vehemently started spreading the idea of 'Two Nation Theory' which was later picked up by Jinnah. Again, the partition of India was a British conspiracy to keep India fighting within itself, so that it would never emerge as a global power. So, it would not be surprising to say that Savarkar and other Hindutva leaders were working on British agenda of dividing the country, like the Muslim League. Not so 'veer' afterall.

Read:

Age of Mother of Believers Aisha (ra) at marriage.

2018-12-30T15:37:00.001-08:00

The dissection of the so called hadith in question.

According to Abdurrahman b. Ebi Zinad el-Medeni, Ibn Kathir and Ibn Hajar, Asma the elder sister of Aisha, was ten years older than Aisha. It is reported in Ibn Kathir’s Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah, as well as in Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani’s Taqreeb al-Tehzeeb:

“Asma died in 73 A.H. at the age of one hundred years. She was ten years older than her sister Aisha.”

According to this, Asma (ra) must be around 27-28 during the migration (al-hijrat), which makes Aisha 17-18 at the migration (in 622). It is a known fact that she started to live with Muhammad (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) at least two years after the migration. Then, Aisha must be 19-20 when she started to live with Muhammad (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ). This is the strongest evidence.

Sheikh Imran Hossein describes it

There is other proof that Aisha was at least fifteen years old when she started to live with Prophet Muhammad (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ):

Narrated Ibn `Umar: That the Prophet (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) inspected him on the day of Uhud while he was fourteen years old, and the Prophet (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) did not allow him to take part in the battle. He was inspected again by the Prophet (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) on the day of Al- Khandaq (i.e. battle of the Trench) while he was fifteen years old, and the Prophet (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) allowed him to take Part in the battle.[1] When we take into account that Aisha took part in the preparations before Badr and the war of Uhud, and we consider the duties that a woman would have to fulfill in war, it is evident that Aisha must be at least 16 years old during the Battle of Uhud, which is one year after she started to live with Muhammad (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ).

According to Kitab al-Tafsir by Bukhari, Aisha (ra) herself is reported to say that she was a young girl (jariyah) when the Surah al-Qamar was sent down[2]. Variations of the narration includes the texts of the 45th and 46th verses of Surah al-Qamar. That Surah was sent down eight years before the migration. As an infant cannot be aware of such an incident, we can infer that Aisha was between the ages 6-13 during the revelation of this Surah. Taking into account that she had memorized the two verses of the surah, proximity to 13 is more logical. According to this, she must be between 14-21 when she got married to Muhammad (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) (with proximity to 21 being more logical).
Reported Imam Ahmad b. Hanbal in his Musnad: After the pass away of Khadijah bint Khuwaylid,Hawlah Bint Hakim, the wife of Uthman Ibn Maz’un, came to the Prophet (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) and asked him: “O Prophet (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) of Allah, would you like to get married?” The Prophet (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) asked: ‘With whom?” She answered:“Aisha (ra), the daughter of the dearest person to you (i.e. Abu Bakr)”In Arabic, for a girl to be called “bikr = بكر”, she must have, in the least, reached the puberty.

It was also reported by Imam Ahmad that Aisha (ra) used to be engaged to Jubair Bin Mutyim who was the son of Al-Mutyim Bin Udai who was a disbeliever, before she got married to Prophet Muhammad (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ). Abu Bakr (ra), father of Aisha(ra), would not have agreed to this engagement after the start of the revelation since this family were disbelievers. This proves that Aisha (ra) was born before the start of the revelation, and that she was a girl at a marriageable age even before her marriage to Prophet Muhammad (صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ).

Original article at: Click Here.

Previous post on same topic: Click Here

Rogue, Terrorist and Zionist Pakistan Army: Persecution of Pashtoons and the raise of PTM

2018-12-28T03:40:00.000-08:00

Nexus between Pak Army and Terrorists

Ever since its inception, the dubious "Islamic Republic" of Pakistan has been persecuting the Pashtoon community relentlessly. The Pashtoons are known for their warrior like temperament and conservative Sunni beliefs. This was considered very dangerous for the Anglo-American Empire. The Britishers have been using the fake 'Islamic' (read wahhabi) state of Pakistan to suppress the Pashtoons in the most ruthless manner. Showing the fake 'threat' to Islam from communism spreading from Soviet Union into Afghanistan, the ISI was able to incite Pashtoons to take up arms against Soviets. But what the Afghans did not imagine was the radicalization and wahhabi indoctrination of the Afghan youth by Saudi Arabia and ISI. ISI, Saudi Arabia and US brought in large amounts of 'Mujahideen' (terrorists) from Uzbek, Tajek and Arab countries etc, supplied them with American weapons, ISI and Pakistan army trained them. In the words of one of the Generals "Pashtoon belt was used as a Nursery for breeding of Mujahideen". These radicalized (now wahhabi) youth later became the Taliban. ISI provides protection to these Taliban terrorists even today and in turn uses these terrorists to attack its targets in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Attacks On Sufi Sunnis-
The real Conservative Orthodox Sunnis or the Ahlu Sunnah Jamaat -Comprising more than 90% of Muslim Population of the world- is the target of the Wahhabi/Salafi/Takfiri terrorists all over the world.
There is an ideological battle, along with political, that is going on between the Wahhabi ISI/Army and the conservative Sunni Pashtoons. Most of the times bomb blasts happen at Dargahs, shrines, Milad Mehfils of conservative sunnis- practices which are considered as 'Shirk' and people doing them are considered 'mushrik' and killing them is a service to Islam. The wahhabi Taliban terrorists of wahhabi ISI attack Sufi Sunnis and Shias as they consider them to be Non-Muslims and it is halaal to kill them (according to Ibn Abdul Wahhab's fatwas).

ISI had established Hundreds and Thousands of Wahhabi madrassas with the help of foreign funding and it runs many of these extremist madrassas even today.

Consider the bomb blasts on Sunnis:

Milad un Nabi (saw) celebrations in Afghanistan
and Pakistan.
Shabaz Qalandar Blast.
Pir Rakhel Shah Blast.
Bari Imam Shrine Blast.
Data Darbar Blast.
Baba Farid Shrine Blast.
A list of Blasts at Shrine and Dargahs- Click here. Note: This is not the Full List.
The list goes on and on if you keep digging, with thousands of innocent Sunnis killed so far.
APS school attack, killing innocent Sunni Pashtoon children, in order to get free hand in the fake Raddul fasaad operations and to set up Military courts.

These attacks were carried out by Wahhabis (Taliban), who are supported and protected by the ISI.

(Note: Wherever you read "Sunni extremist group" in any news, read it as "Wahhabi". These wahhabi fanatics even count Sufi Sunnis(the majority of orthodox moderate Sunni population on earth) as Shias. The fact is Ahlus Sunnah had co-existed with shias quite peacefully under Sunni Khalifas and rulers. Problems started with the advent of new terrorist sect called Wahhabism, which is state religion of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan (state is ISI and Army).)

Attrocities on Pashtoons and the Fake war on Taliban- Fake Zarb e Azb, Fake Raddul Fasaad:

Manzoor Pashteen Speaks of Army's Fake war on Taliban and atrocities of Pakistan army and ISI on Pashtoons.

The brave Pashtoons have been always used to fight the war for Pakistan- either it be the war with Afghanistan or defending Pakistan during India-Pakistan wars- Pashtoons were in front line and took the brunt of enemy attacks. But when it came to development and rights of the Pashtoon people, the wahhabi terrorist state of Pakistan has always kept them under its foot, not allowing them to raise their heads. Pashtoons tell the world that the 'war on terror' by Pakistan army is a farce. Army evacuated the Pashtoon tribals in these areas, shells and bombs their homes, entire villages and towns devastated. But when the Pashtoons come back to their localities, to their horror, they find the very Taliban, whom the military is supposed to be fighting, are sitting in army camps and they have become more powerful than before. Pashtoons are not allowed to question this. Whenever an elder from the community speaks up against the Taliban, people find his head cut off and thrown away at a different location. The ISI controlled Pakistani media reports the killing of innocent women and children in these army raids with headlines such as- "13 Militants eliminated". The wahhabi terrorist army stages this drama to passify America and to get its flow of Dollars, for which it has become addicted to from a long time.

Kidnapping and Target Killings of Pashtoon Leaders:

Pashtoons protesting against Pakistan army at a rally.

Whoever dares to speak against the real dictator/ruler of Pakistan (Army is the State and Ruler) finds himself kidnapped and languishing in a dark confinement cell for decades or his dead body floats in next day's new paper headlines. Voltaire was right when he said "To learn who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize." Moreover the Army and ISI have gotten into dirty business of organ trade of the kidnapped persons, according to Pashtoon Community leaders.

Few names from recent past who were kidnapped or murdered by the ISI/army:

Ali Raza Abidi:

For being critical of The Establishment (Army and ISI).
SP Tahir Dawar:

Ruthless abduction in broad day light, Authorities decline to comment saying its "sensitive" issue-indicates abduction by ISI, body found in Afghanistan after few days. Supposedly, the Taliban terrorists crossed all the check posts from Islamabad to Afghan border and then cross the border with Tahir Dawar's dead body. Definitely a ISI handy work. Its quite common for the terrorists to cross the check posts in ISI vehicles, without being checked. In fact SP Dawar was very sincere and strict officer with a soft corner for PTM. He had arrested terrorists previously while smuggling weapons through the check posts- who were let gone by the ISI.

Wife of Tahir Dawar refuses Pakistan flag on her Husband's Body.

Haroon Bilour:

The Awami National Party is popular among Pashtoons for fighting for their rights. Haroon's father was also martyred in a terrorist attack in . Ghulam Ahmed Bilour categorically stated that 'My nephew was killed by our own people."
Bashir Bilour: Father of Haroon Bilour, was also martyred by the deep state and its terrorists.

This is second post in the series of posts exposing the Wahhabi terrorist deep state in Pakistan that actually rules Pakistan or rightly said by its critics- Na-Pakistan. Muslims all over the world should wake up to this reality.

Rogue, Terrorist, Zionist Pakistan Army- Brief History of some Generals.

2018-12-27T15:35:00.002-08:00

Most of the Indian Muslims already know that Pakistan army breeds terrorism. But for the rest of the Muslim world, it might be little hard to understand that the Pakistani state as such is a fake Islamic state which was formed on the fraudulent "Two Nation Theory" which was actually a brain child of Hindutva right wing leaders, which Jinnah adopted at a later date. We know that Politicians of Indian subcontinent are usually corrupt. But here we will focus on the Pakistani Army, which is far more corrupt, criminal and ruthless with no regard to any law (either their constitutional or religious laws). Moreover we shall see that Pakistani army (or its generals) have always been working on the Zionist agenda.

The topic is so big, we shall cover it in a number of posts. We will be doing a series on this.

Ayub Khan:

Soon after his illegal power grab, Ayub Khan allied with US and NATO. Joined CENTO and SEATO pacts, allowed American spy planes in Pakistan. This alienated the Soviet Union. Instead of having good relations with a trustworthy nation like Soviet Union, who is the neighbor of Pakistan, he allied with Zionist power- US and UK.
He was very cruel and unfair towards east Pakistan imposing unreasonable taxes and discriminating Bengalis. Alienated the East Pakistanis: After independence, Ayub was at one time posted as General Officer Commanding (GOC) East Pakistan. During his tenure, there he did not treat East Pakistanis well. His attitude towards them was that of a colonising army commander. After he became CMLA and President, he did not change and his attitude towards them was one of casual indifference and disregard to their genuine and legitimate rights and needs. His remarks to an East Pakistan politician Mushtaq Khundkar, if East Pakistan is not satisfied, then they may secede, to which the latter promptly replied, it is always the minority that secedes and in this case West Pakistan being a minority may secede, if you want to. This lead to the formation of Bangladesh, with the help of India and Soviet Union. Infact, separation from the rogue nation like Pakistan was best thing that ever happened to the Bangladeshis. Now Bangladesh economy is better than Pakistan.
He was a drunkard, used to eat pork but he named the capital as 'Islamabad' to deceive and cheat Orthodox Muslim majority community of Pakistan.
He launched the utter flop Operation Gibraltar which was the reason for 1965 Indo-Pak war. Point to note here: Kashmiris did not support the Pakistani militants that had crossed the border, which was one of the major the reasons for this operation's failure.
He paved the way for the raise of ISI and its meddling in Politics, Assassination and kidnappings of political opponents within the country.
Allowed the USA to establish a top secret base at Badaber, near Peshawar, and provided all the logistic support to operate the Americas spy plane U2 to fly over Russia to gather intelligence.
Illegal detention and torture to death of Political Activist Hasan Nasir, popular among peasants, students and laborers.

General Ziaul Haq:

It is hard to list the terrorist activities of Zia ul Haq. Here we will point out a few:

Training and building up of Afghan Mujahideen (Today's afghan Taliban terrorists) to fight against Soviets.
Spreading extremist wahhabi ideology all over Wazirsitan and Pakhtoon tribal areas, using it as breeding ground for terrorist recruitment. These terrorists are used to kidnap and murder anyone who differs with the army.
Killing of 25,000 Palestinian rebels in Jordan uprising and other operations in Arab countries where popular uprisings were crushed and Western puppet rulers were supported in the Arab world by the Pakistan Army under Zia ul Haq.
Played a key role in bringing back Egypt into Arab league, after Egypt was boycotted by Arab countries for signing the Camp Davis agreement with Israel. A Islamic conference of 42 Islamic countries had expelled Egypt. Pakistan and Saudi King played an important role in bring back Egypt into Arab league fold and giving it a leadership role in Arab.
1956 Suez Canal Crisis: Nasser of Egypt wanted to nationalize the Suez Canal where Pakistan (so called Islamic Country), sided with western powers and Pakistani diplomats were very strongly supportive of Israel's actions against Nasser. (Book: Beyond the Veil: Israel, Pakistan Relations by P. R. Kumaraswamy).
Had Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto assassinated.

General Musharraf:

Allowed Americans to pass through and enter Afghanistan along with their heavy weapons in return for Billions of Dollars.
Was the best friend of America in its fight against terrorism. Helped in massacring Lakhs of innocent Muslims in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Kashmir.
Kidnapping and selling of Dr. Afia Siddiqui: Under his watch, terrorist ISI kidnapped thousands of Muslims from Afghanistan and Pakistan and sold them to America. Majority of Guantanamo Bay prisoners were sold to Americans by Pakistan, including Afia Siddiqui.
Even to this day, ISI blocks any attempts to get Afia Siddiqui release. May be she knows the dirty secrets of ISI. Either this, or Afia is might be a ISI agent, a trained terrorist, as hinted by her ex-husband Amjad Khan. If this is true, why would Pakistan government not send any official request for extradition of Afia from US? Why does ISI stall her release? This is a strange, mysterious story.
ISI involvement in 9/11: There is mounting evidence to suggest that ISI was hand in glove with the Zionists and NeoCons in carrying out the 9/11 attacks, killing innocent Americans. Again, in exchange for large sums of money.
Benazir Bhutto Killing: Its a very big topic, needs to be dealt with in details. But one thing that is for sure is that, it happened under the rule of Musharraf.
Hiding Osama Bin Laden in Abottabad close to army barracks with full protection.

Pakistan Army general cadre, foot soldiers might be disciplined but the Generals and Commanders who make policies and take decisions; and the ISI deep state have all the features of a paid mercenary organization and a terrorist organization with no regard to any law (either religious laws or constitutional laws or international laws). More posts will be coming on this topic. InshaAllah.

Yogi Adityanat proved that Two Nation Theory was a Hindutva brain child adopted by Jinnah.

2018-12-26T09:11:00.001-08:00

Two Nation Theory by Yogi at 1:17.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in one of his speeches had said "Hindu and Muslim are two different communities and can not live together, there will be war one day for sure". Does this sound familiar? Yes, its nothing but the infamous two nation theory. Muslims have been blamed for the partition in India. But how come self proclaimed nationalists from BJP and RSS talk two nation theory? well, its nothing new. Actually roots of Two Nation Theory were planted long back, by the Hindutva-Sangh Elders.

In a chapter titled “Two-Nation Theory: Origin and Hindu-Muslim Variants”, Shamsul Islam underlines the fact that much before the Muslim League came up with the two-nation theory, leaders such as Madan Mohan Malaviya, B. S. Moonje and Lajpat Rai were championing the cause of a Hindu nation. Much before them, Raj Narain Basu (1826-1899), maternal grandfather of Aurobindo Ghosh, and his close associate Naba Gopal Mitra (1840-1894) had emerged as the co-fathers of Hindu nationalism. Eminent historian R. C. Majumdar has remarked that “Naba Gopal forestalled Jinnah’s theory of two nations by more than half a century”. So, the onus for spreading the belief that Hindus and Muslims constituted two separate nations that could not peacefully co-exist with each other should first be placed at the door of Hindu leaders.

Savarkar:
Founder of Hindutva declared in favour of the two-nation theory at Ahmedabad in 1937, where he was elected president of the Hindu Mahasabha.
While addressing the 19th session of the Hindu Mahasabha in the city, he declared: “There are two antagonistic nations living side by side in India”, underlining, “India cannot be assumed today to be a unitarian and homogenous nation. On the contrary, there are two nations in the main: the Hindus and the Muslims, in India.” Full Article with Reference.

Golwalkar:
Golwalkar of the RSS in his We Or Our Nationhood Defined had expressed very clear ideas on what ought to be done with minorities. Second-class citizenship and a beggar’s existence at the mercy of the majority was his proposed solution. Visceral in his hatred for minorities, Golwalkar proposed a Nazi-type solution. Such ideas served to heighten Muslim insecurity and push them into a corner ultimately forcing the creation of Pakistan. Full Article with Reference.

Bhai Paramanand:
“The territory beyond Sind should be united with Afghanistan and the North-West Frontier Province into a great Musalman kingdom. The Hindus of the region should come away, while at the same time Mussalman in the rest of India should go and settle in this territory."

Lajpat Rai:
“Under my scheme the Muslims will have four Muslim States: (1) The Pathan Province of the North Western Frontier (2) Western Punjab (3) Sindh and (4) Eastern Bengal. If there are compact Muslim communities in any other part of India, sufficiently large to form a Province, they should be similarly constituted. But it should be distinctly understood that this is not a united India. It means a clear partition of India into a Muslim India and a non-Muslim India.

Lala Har Dayal:
“I declare that the future of the Hindu race, of Hindustan and of the Punjab, rests on these four pillars: (1) Hindu Sangathan, (2) Hindu Raj, (3) Shuddhi of Muslims, and (4) Conquest and Shuddhi of Afghanistan and the Frontiers. So long as the Hindu Nation does not accomplish these four things, the safety of our children and great grandchildren will be ever in danger, and the safety of Hindu race will be impossible. The Hindu race has but one history, and its institutions are homogenous. But the Mussalman and Christians are far removed from the confines of Hindustan, for their religions are alien and they love Persian, Arab, and European institutions. Thus, just as one removes foreign matter from the eye, Shuddhi must be made of these two religions. Afghanistan and the hilly regions of the frontier were formerly part of India, but are at present under the domination of Islam […] Just as there is Hindu religion in Nepal, so there must be Hindu institutions in Afghanistan and the frontier territory; otherwise it is useless to win Swaraj."

Full Article with references.

Shyama Prasad Mookerjee:
Mookerjee believed in the two-nation theory and advocated the Partition of Bengal. At the time of the Quit India movement in 1942, Mookerjee was the Finance Minister of Bengal and the second most senior minister in the government after Bengal’s Prime Minister, Fazlul Haq.

Mookerjee’s party, the Hindu Mahasabha, had decided to cooperate with the colonial government given that, in their view, the real battle was against India’s Muslims. The party even helped the British recruit for World War II, with Vinayak Savarkar appealing for Hindus to enlist in large numbers in the colonial army. - Full article with reference.

So Mani Shankar Aiyer was right when he said that Savarvar was the first proponent of the Two Nation Theory. And its very sad to see Congress kneeling before the fascist forces instead of supporting Mr. Aiyer.

Qadiyanis- How they are different from Non-Muslims.

2018-12-26T02:57:00.001-08:00

Ahmedi leaders welcomes Modi to Israel

The Qadiyani sect, an illegal child of the British is being promoted as the moderate peaceful version of Islam. Qadiyanis are shown as the anti-thesis to Wahhabi/Salafi terrorist ideology and Qadiyani pseudo scholars are masquerading as saviors of Islam. While the truth is- Wahhabism and Qadianism are both illegal children of Britain, both have been planted in Islam to defame it, to break the unity of Muslims and to implode Muslim ummah from within. Our elders and Ulama of Ahle Sunnah had identified these illegitimate children (wahhabis and qadiyanis) and long back declared them as Non-Muslims. But now a days the Munafiq liberal media, which is controlled by the Zionists all over the world, is presenting the Qadiyanis as peaceful, moderate Muslims who are "persecuted" by "extremist" Muslims.

Why are Qadiyanis different from other Non-Muslims:
The question to ask is- who is the oppressor and who is the oppressed here? Imagine some guy disguises himself like you and enters your home when you are away and sleeps with your wife, spoiling your kids and mingles in your home and behaves like its his home. How does the thought feel? This is the question I would want to put forward to those liberal munafiq Muslims who post comments such as "Love for all, hate for none" "Qadiyanis should not be persecuted" "we love our minorities". Now imagine, you go to the police and complain that some guy has taken your place and living in your home when you were away and the police label you as the false intruder and declare the fraud as the real you. Something similar is happening in Islam. Qadiyanis are pretending to be concerned about their so called persecution by extremists Muslims, while they are enjoying full support of global powers and hijacking Islam from within. Hindus or Christians or Jews, don't claim to be Muslims, they don't have Muslim names, don't celebrate Muslim festivals, dont have Masjids. But these Qadiyanis, like wahhabis are a counterfeit faith which disguises itself as Islam, to hijack and destroy Islam from within.

British agents Wahhabis and Qadiyanis are hi-jacking Islam while real Muslims who resist this hijack by counterfeits frauds are labelled as 'Extremists'.

Qadiyani Beliefs:
Muslims co-existed with Hindus and Christians from 1400 years, without any problems. Qadiyanis are counterfeit, duplicate faith which calls itself Islam. Why is it a counterfeit fraud? Let us examine their beleifs:

Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiyani first called himself the promised Imam Mahdi, then declared himself as a Prophet. Which is blasphemous, as it is a basic tenet of Islam that Mohammad (saw) is the last Prophet (saw) of Allah.
Mirza Ghulam Qadiyani says that Quran was lifted to skies at the time of 1857 war of independence (apparently because war with the British was prohibited in Islam according to Qadiyani) and then sent back upon the false Prophet Mirza Qadiyani.
Qadiyanis consider Muslims as Kafir because they dont believe in the latest prophet (astaghfirullah) qadiyani.
From about the year 1911 Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad (second khalifa of the Qadiani Movement) started to put forward the doctrine that it is not sufficient for a person to declare belief in the Kalima Shahada in order to be a Muslim because Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had now appeared as a prophet and belief in him must be acknowledged as well.
According to Mirza Mahmud Ahmad, it is no longer sufficient for the existing Muslims to believe in the Holy Prophet Muhammad and all the prophets before him. Now they must also declare that they believe in the prophet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as well. Otherwise they cannot remain Muslims.
Qadiyanis prohibit funeral prayers of Muslims.
Qadiyanis believe, there are 2 Mohammads (astaghfirullah), one is our Master, Rasool Allah (saw) and the second Mohmmad is Mirza Qadiyani.
Qadiyanis believe that Allah promised Rasool Allah (saw) that He will send the Rasool (saw) down on earth once again, in Qadiyan. And that Mirza Ghulam is the reincarnation of Rasool Allah (saw) (Naozubillah, Astaghfirullah).

Watch the Video above and this link.

Mirza and His Family were Servants of the Imperialism:
Mirza Ghulam proudly wrote:

"My father was a well-known landlord in this country and he enjoyed great eminence in the Government's offices. He was a true devotee and well wisher of the British Government. In the mutiny of 1857 (the Muslim independence movement against colonialism is called 'mutiny' by Mirza), my father supplied fifty horses and riders to aid the British Government. For this favor to the Government, he was very popular among the officials." (Izala-e-Auham, P. 58, footnote)
"The benevolent Government is aware of the fact that we are from among their servants, their sympathizers and well wishers. We have come to their aid with a firm mind in every hour of need. My father was held in close and high esteem by the Government; and our services to this Government held clear distinction. I do not think that the Government has forgotten these services of ours. My father, Mirza Ghulam Murtaza, son of Mirza Ata Muhammad Al-Qadian, was a great well wisher and friend of this government and enjoyed great respect from among them. Our loyalty has been proven beyond doubt. Rather our fidelity was proven among the people and became clear to the government officials. The Government may confirm this from the officers who came to this side and lived among us; so that they may tell what sort of life we lived, and how faithful we have been in serving their Government." (Noor-ul-Haq, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 8, P. 36-37; Noor-ul-Haq, Vol. 1, P. 27-28)
"I come from a family which is out and out loyal to this government. My father, Mir Ghulam Murtaza, who was considered its well-wisher, used to be granted a chair in the Governor's Darbar (cabinet) and has been mentioned by Mr. Griffin in his 'History of the Princes of Punjab'. In 1857, he helped the British government beyond his means, that is he procured fifty (50) cavaliers and horses right during the time of the mutiny. He was considered by the government to be its loyal supporter and well-wisher. A number of testimonials of appreciation received by him from the officers have unfortunately been lost. Copies of three of them, however, which had been published a long time ago, are reproduced in the margin (in English). Then, after the death of my grandfather, my elder brother Mirza Ghulam Qadir remained occupied with service to the government and when the evil-doers encountered the forces of the British government on the highway of Tanmmun, he participated in the battle on the side of the British Government (under General Nicholson he killed several freedom fighters). At the time of the death of my father and brother, I was sitting in the sidelines; but, since then, I have been helping the British for seventeen years with my pen." (Kitab-ul-Barriah, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 13, P. 4, 5, 6, 7; Shahadat-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 6, P. 385-387; Ishtihar Wajib al-Izhar, Sept. 20, 1897, P. 3-7; appended with Kitab-ul-Barriah)
"I am scion of a family which the English Government acknowledges to be faithful to it. British officers have also admitted that my father and my people are amongst those who served the Government in all sincerity and with heart and soul. I can not find the words to express my homage and gratitude to the beneficent Government on account of the peace and composure which we have found as subjects of the Government. For this reason, we - myself, my father and my brother - have girded up our loins that we will exhibit the favors and advantages of this Government, make obedience to it incumbent on the people and embed it in their hearts." (Tabligh-e-Risalat, Vol. 7, P. 8-9)

Mirza Qadiyani's New Faith:
Having been quickly raised to the status of a "scholar", Mirza Ghulam began fulfilling the promise he had made to his British supporters. It was time to deliver on his promise and make sure that Muslims would not try to repeat the uprising of the 1857. The first step was to make obedience to the anti-Islamic British government an article of faith.
He declared:

"It has been proven from my continuous seventeen year long speeches that I am faithful and sincere to the English Empire from the core of my heart and soul. I am the son of a father who was also a friend to this Government. My faith is to obey this Government and love the people; These are the conditions set for my devotees and followers who take the oath of allegiance to me. I have stressed this clause under the fourth item of my pamphlet Shuroo-al-Baiat (oath of faith) which has been distributed among my devotees and followers." (Kitab-ul-Barriah, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 13, P. 10; Kitab-ul-Barriha, P. 9, Supplement)
"I published the provisions of faith so that these may become a constitution for my sect and for everyone who follows me and I have named it as: 'Completion of the Mission and requirements of Fealty'. I have sent one copy to the Government so that it may know that I have planned for my followers to be faithful to the British Government." (Tabligh-e-Risalat, Vol. 7, P.16)
"No doubt my faith and doctrine, which I stress, is that Islam is composed of two parts. One is obedience to Allah and the other is obedience to the Government which has created peace and under whose protection we are safe from oppressors - that is the British Government. (Shahadat-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 6, P. 380; Shahadat-ul-Quran, P. 86)
His son and a ruler of the Qadiani (Ahmadi) movement emphasized this fundamental doctrine of Qadianism: "The promised Messiah included among the conditions of fealty faithfulness to the English Government and said: 'Whoever does not obey the Government, takes part in demonstrations against it or does not enforce its orders is not a member of our community'." (Tohfatul-Mulhuk, P. 123; by Mahmood Ahmad Qadiani.

More details: Click here.

Qadiyanis in Israel Army:

Qadiyanis girls of pakistani origin work in Israeli army- Link 1, Link 2.
Special treatment of Ahmedi sect by Israel- Link 3.

So Qadiyanis are attacking Islam both directly and from within, but our brainwashed liberal Muslims are misguided and wandering like sheep, abusing their own Ulama who raise their voice against this injustice.

Qadiayanis accept that they are non Muslims:
Recently, during a court proceeding, Qadiyanis in Malaysia agree that they are Non- Muslims and therefore Shariah laws should not be imposed on them: Click here. Qadiyanis tried to spin this news through their media power. But truth is that in the court, the Qadiyanis said that they are non-Muslims so shariat council has no right to summon them on shariah issues. No Muslim would present such an argument to escape from a court case.

Qadiyanis' Direct attack on Quran:
Qadiyani leader in Malaysia says “There’s something wrong with such thinking, or telling Muslims that all non-believers will go to hell." Ask any Muslim "what is the basic requirement to enter Jannah according to Islam?", he will tell you "you have to be a Muslim." Quran on numerous occasions says that the kaafir will be thrown into hell. But Qadiyanis say this is wrong.
Source: Click here.

Where is Najd?: Refuting the lies of Wahhabis

2018-12-23T03:44:00.002-08:00

Consider the following Hadith:

Sahih Bukhari Volume 2, Book 17 (Dua for Rin, Istisqaa):

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّى، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا حُسَيْنُ بْنُ الْحَسَنِ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ عَوْنٍ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ، قَالَ اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ لَنَا فِي شَامِنَا وَفِي يَمَنِنَا‏.‏ قَالَ قَالُوا وَفِي نَجْدِنَا قَالَ قَالَ اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ لَنَا فِي شَامِنَا وَفِي يَمَنِنَا‏.‏ قَالَ قَالُوا وَفِي نَجْدِنَا قَالَ قَالَ هُنَاكَ الزَّلاَزِلُ وَالْفِتَنُ، وَبِهَا يَطْلُعُ قَرْنُ الشَّيْطَانِ‏.‏

Narrated Ibn `Umar:

(The Prophet) said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and our Yemen." People said, "Our Najd as well." The Prophet again said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and Yemen." They said again, "Our Najd as well." On that the Prophet (ﷺ) said, "There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the head of Satan."

قَرْنُ الشَّيْطَانِ- Qarnu Shaitaan: Some have translated it as Horn of the Devil.

The Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) pointed towards the East and said:
"There, that is the direction from where Fitna will emerge."

The Wahhabis have been propagating lies in order to hide themselves from this hadith. They have worked hard with their fabricated materials and corrupted logic to label Iraq as Najd. But we shall clearly and logically refute this InshaAllah.

Najd and Iraq are different:

Consider the following Hadith:

Further evidence can be cited from the cluster of hadiths which identify the miqat points for pilgrims. In a hadith narrated by Imam Nasa’i (Manasik al-Hajj, 22), ‘A’isha (r.a.) declared that ‘Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) established the miqat for the people of Madina at Dhu’l-Hulayfa, for the people of Syria and Egypt at al-Juhfa, for the people of Iraq at Dhat Irq, and for the people of Najd at Qarn, and for the Yemenis at Yalamlam.’ Imam Muslim (Hajj, 2) narrates a similar hadith: ‘for the people of Madina it is Dhu’l-Hulayfa - while on the other road it is al-Juhfa - for the people of Iraq it is Dhat Irq, for the people of Najd it is Qarn, and for the people of Yemen it is Yalamlam.’

Sahih Muslim Book 007, Hadith Number 2666.

Chapter : The place where the pilgrims enter upon the state of Ihram.

Abu Zubair heard Jabir b. 'Abdullah (Allah be pleased with them) as saying as he was asked about (the place for entering upon the) state of Ihram: I heard (and I think he carried it directly to the Apostle of Allah) him saying: For the people of Medina Dhu'l-Hulaifa is the place for entering upon the state of Ihram, and for (the people coming through the other way, i.e. Syria) it is Juhfa; for the people of Iraq it is Dbat al-'Irq; for the people of Najd it is Qarn (al-Manazil) and for the people of Yemen it is Yalamlam.

So, from the Sahih Hadith itself we have clearly demonstrated that Najd and Iraq are two different places. The wahhabis try to convince people that the Martydom of Hussein (ra) and many more tribulations and fitnah happened in Iraq, so Njad refers to Iraq. But how come through out the Islamic history, where there were fitnah and tribulations in Kufa, Iraq, no Historian (Islamic or western; a Kufite or a Madani, makki) has ever referred Iraq as 'Najd'. History books are full of fitnahs and trails of Kufa, Basra, iraq, but none use the word Najd to describe these regions. Because anyone who knows History, knows that Najd might literally mean 'high land' or 'plateau', but the name Najd belongs to the central land of Saudi arabia (present Riyad and surrounding places). Now this new sect of Wahhabis has started this propaganda. Rasool Allah (saw) considered Najd and Iraq as two different places, that is why two different miqat points were allotted for these two different places.

Location of Najd is derived from the Hadith as located:

East of Madina (Most commonly accepted)
Towards Iraq (opinion of few scholars)

From ibn Umar that he said: I heard the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu alyahi wa sallam, saying while facing the east: “Indeed Afflictions are there, from where appears the Horn of Satan.” (Shahih Muslim No.5167)

حدثنا عبد الله ثنا أبي ثنا أبو سعيد مولى بنى هاشم ثنا عقبة بن أبي الصهباء ثنا سالم عن عبد الله بن عمر قال صلى رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم الفجر ثم سلم فاستقبل مطلع الشمس فقال ألا ان الفتنة ههنا ألا ان الفتنة ههنا حيث يطلع قرن الشيطان

Muhammad PBUH did the Dawn Prayer and facing toward the SUN RISE (east) and said: “Fitnah will come from here. Fitnah will come from here from the horn of Satan” [Musnad Ahmad 2/72 no 5410 shahih]

For Details: Click here

Let us have a look at Old Maps of the Arabian penensula:

We already proved that Iraq and Najd are two different places. The Prophet (saw), from whom all these Hadiths originate, himself considered Iraq and Najd as different places. And also, "Towards Iraq" does not mean Iraq. Does it? Let us have a look at some maps. Najd is underlined in Red.
Source: Click here

Encyclopedia Britannica Defines Najd:

Najd, also spelled Nejd, region, central Saudi Arabia, comprising a mainly rocky plateau sloping eastward from the mountains of the Hejaz. On the northern, eastern, and southern sides, it is bounded by the sand deserts of Al-Nafūd, Al-Dahnāʾ, and the Rubʿ al-Khali. It is sparsely settled, except for the fertile oases strung along the escarpment of Jabal (mountains) Ṭuwayq and the Al-ʿAramah plateau. The arid region remained politically divided among rival peoples until the mid-18th century, when it became the centre of the Wahhābī, a fundamentalist Islamic movement. Led by the Muslim scholar Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhāb and the Āl Saʿūd family, the movement consolidated Najd and expanded into Mecca in 1803. This expansionist policy antagonized the Ottomans, who seized the provincial capital of Al-Dirʿiyyah. The Āl Saʿūd, however, quickly regained control, and, with Riyadh as the new capital from 1824, the dynasty has ruled Najd continuously, save for a brief period around the turn of the century when the Rashīd dynasty extended its power over the province. Ibn Saʿūd proclaimed the unified Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932, and his provincial capital of Riyadh became the national capital, although Jiddah continued as the diplomatic capital.

Confessions of a British Spy: Hempher, the British Spy, in his Book 'Confessions of a British Spy'calls to Mohammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab as 'Najdi' at many times; as Ibn Abdul wahhab was from Najd, the central land of Saudi Arabia. Anybody who opens History books of Arab, will find 'Najd' written all over Riyad and its surrounding places.

Wahhabis/Salafis are not Sunnis.

2018-12-22T05:00:00.003-08:00

The Ahlus Sunnah or Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaat (I am not talking about that silly organization 'ahle sunnah wal jamat' registered in Pakistan, I am talking about the original ummah coming from Rasool Allah (saw) and sahabs, sunni is short form of Ahle sunnah wa jamaat) is the largest and main sect of Islam. These days we see many sects in Islam and it has become very confusing for a modern day common Muslim. There is an identity crisis among the Muslim Youth, as they have lost touch with the Ulama of Ahle Sunnah, thereby they have gone astray and mingled with other sects- a result of "All are one" propaganda going on these days. Is it really "all sects are one"? Or is it just a deception to break the main root and trunk of the Ummah, the Ahle Sunnah wa Jamaat into more pieces? The other sects, especially the Wahhabis, Salafis, Deobandis, Tabhleeghis are very viscous in their campaign against the Ahle Sunnah wa Jamaat. The basis of origin of these sects is their opposition with Ahle Sunnah wa Jamaat. However or whatever their claims might be, If you look at the history, all these sects are new comers, all of them created or tactically supported by the British Intelligence.

Who are Sunnis?:

In a 2016 International Conference on Sunni Islam held at Gronzy, Chechenya, more than 200 established clerics of high eminence have tried to dispel this confusion of who is real Sunni. They have defined Sunnis as:

“Ahl as-Sunnah wal-Jama’ah are the Ash’arites and Maturidis (adherents of the theological systems of Imam Abu Mansur al-Maturidi and Imam Abul-Hasan Al-Ash`ari). In matters of belief, they are followers of any of the four schools of thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i or Hanbali) and are also the followers of the Sufism of Imam Junaid al-Baghdadi in doctrines, manners and [spiritual] purification. Source.

Many people might be thinking, "Ok, so what does this definition actually say?" Well, lets be precise, this definition actually says that Wahhabis, Ahle Hadees, Deobandi, Shia are not Sunnis.

Who are Wahhabis:
Mohammad Ibn Al Wahhab was born in Najd town of Uyayna in 1703. In 1744, Mohammad Ibn Saud offered sanctuary to Ibn Wahhab in the town of Diriyyah, as Ibn Wahhab as banished from other places wherever he had gone- because of his beliefs. The followers of Ibn Wahhab are referred to as Wahhabis (we dont refer to Allah when we say wahhabi, we refer to Ibn Wahhab). According to "Confessions of a British Spy" by British Spy Hempher, Abdul Wahhab was given a specific task- to create a new sect in Sunni Islam that would undermine the authority of the Ottoman Empir, who were orthodox Sunnis whom we now call as Sufi Sunnis.

Wahhabis are not Sunnis:

Yes, as our Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaat Ulama have been telling us from almost 200 years, the conference has declared Wahhabis and Salafis as non-Sunnis.

To avoid any confusion, Grand Imam of Al Azhar, a leader authority in Sunni Islam has categorically declared that Salafis or wahhabis are not Sunnis. Source.

There was widespread condemnation and angry attacks on the conference by Saudi clerics who follow wahhabism. The Saudi puppet dictator in Egypt, has recently started crack down against the grand Imam of Al Azhar.

Almost all terrorist organizations belong to the Wahhabi or Salafi Ideology and a few Shia terrorist organizations if any. Al Qayeda, Jaish e Mohammad, Lashkar e tayba, Al Nusra, Hizbul Mijahideen, Taliban, etc etc all belong to this ideology which is mascaraing as an orthodox Sunni sect, which in fact they are not Sunnis. They are giving very bad name to Sunnis and that seems to be their agenda.

Horn of Devil will arise from Najd:

Consider this Hadith:
According to two narrations in Sahih Bukhari, Muhammad asks Allah to bless the areas of Bilad al-Sham (Syria) and Yemen. When his companions said "Our Najd as well," he replied: "There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the head (e.g. horns) of Satan."^[2]^[3] In a similar narration, Muhammad again asked Allah to bless the areas Medina, Mecca, Sham, and Yemen and, when asked specifically to bless Najd, repeated similar comments about there being earthquakes, trials, tribulations, and the horns of Satan.^[4]^[5]

"O Allaah bestow your blessings on our Shaam. O Allaah bestow your blessings on our Yemen." The people said, "O Messenger of Allaah, and our Najd." I think the third time the Prophet, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, said, "There (in Najd) will occur earthquakes, trials and tribulations, and from there appears the Horn of Satan."

There has been too much propaganda to make the area of 'Najd' a disputed area. The wahhabis have intelligently been claiming that Najd means a high plateau and hence it is Iraq. But here there is no need to translate the name of Najd, Najd was the name of the place where Riyad is located now. For centuries, people called this area as Najd. For example, you dont have right to translate the name of a person and try to appropriate a name to another person based on the translation. Similarly, its very idiotic argument to translate the name 'Najd' and to appropriate it to Iraq. Najd is Riyad, if you open any History book that was written before the formation of Saudi Arabia, you will find that Najd was the name of Riyad and its surrounding places.

More Links:
Link 1 ; Link 2 ; Link 3 ;

Link 4 ; Link 5 ; Link 6

Islam - The Right Path

Israeli 'Settlers' or Terrorists and Provocateurs?

Banned White Phosphorous bombs used bu israel

Israeli-French Captive in Gaza

Heavy firing at 'Metulla' Garrison

Gaza: Al Ahli Baptist Hospital Massacre

Markeva tank exploded

Covid-19 End Game is To End Pax Americana and Bring in Pax Judaica: Sheikh Imran Hosein.

Britain and Al Saud: The Zionist Great Game in Arabia.

1916 Arab Revolt:

The British-Saudi Game Begins:

Shaan e Mustafa (ﷺ)

Tatar Muslim Role in Finland's Winter War- Resisting the Russian Invasion.

When Kuwaiti National Assembly Speaker Expelled Israeli Delegation.

Israel's right to provoke, right to persecute and right to rob the Palestinians in the name of 'Defense'.

Israel's Strategic 'Settlers':

Revisiting 9/11- The Israeli Connection- WTC Security was in Zionist hands.

WTC security:

Murder of FBI agent John O'Neil:

Involvement in Benghazi attack:

Nick Kroll:

Rogue, Terrorist and Zionist Pakistan Army: Sex Trade.

Brief Intro of Wahhabism:

Sex trade by Pakistan Army:

Revisiting 9/11- The Israeli Connection- Larry Silverstein- The guy who made 4.6 Billion USD out of 9/11 attacks.

Larry Silverstein:

Larry's friends:

Larry's Infamous Incriminating "Pull it" remark:

Debunking the Hadith of Constantinople and exposing Yazid (lanatullah alaih)

The Hadith:

We shall prove that Yazid (lanatullah alaih) does not belong to both categories.

Yazid was not in the first Naval expedition:

Yazid was not in second expedition willingly:

The Sanad of this Hadith are not trustworthy:

Other Sunni Scholars about this topic of Yazid and the Hadith of Constantinople:

Sahaba Ikram did not know about this Hadith:

Conclusion:

Heros of Islam: Sultan Nooruddin Zhangi (ra).

The Holy Prophet(صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) in the Blessed Dream:

Why Nooruddin Zhangi(ra):

Nightmare for the Crusaders- The Wrath of Sultan Nooruddin Zhangi:

Death:

Savarkar, the 'Prodigal Son' of British Empire: Not so 'Veer' afterall.

Savarkar vs Bhagat Singh:

Text of the Clemency Petition will make you hang your head in shame, if you are a real patriot:

Age of Mother of Believers Aisha (ra) at marriage.

Rogue, Terrorist and Zionist Pakistan Army: Persecution of Pashtoons and the raise of PTM

Rogue, Terrorist, Zionist Pakistan Army- Brief History of some Generals.

Yogi Adityanat proved that Two Nation Theory was a Hindutva brain child adopted by Jinnah.

Qadiyanis- How they are different from Non-Muslims.

Where is Najd?: Refuting the lies of Wahhabis

Najd and Iraq are different:

Sahih Muslim Book 007, Hadith Number 2666.

Wahhabis/Salafis are not Sunnis.