<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Michelle Tripp: The BrandForward Blog℠</title>
	
	<link>http://michelletripp.com</link>
	<description>Marketing, social media, emerging technology, pop culture, and branding.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/brandforward" /><feedburner:info uri="brandforward" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>BrandBowl 2010</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandforward/~3/MQMp3BnPbMM/</link>
		<comments>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/02/10/brandbowl-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Tripp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[REVIEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Considering the whole reason I watch the Superbowl is for the commercials, when I heard about the Mullen/Radian6 BrandBowl (hashtag #brandbowl on Twitter) I was pretty excited. Finally, something for us AdHeads to participate in. Other than yelling at party guests who carelessly mill around right in front of the TV, or stumble past it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/reviewbrandbowl.jpg" alt="reviewbrandbowl" title="reviewbrandbowl" width="300" height="220" class="alignright" /></p>
<p>Considering the whole reason I watch the Superbowl is for the commercials, when I heard about the Mullen/Radian6 <strong><a href="http://brandbowl2010.com/"><span style="color: #000000;">BrandBowl</a></strong></span> (hashtag #brandbowl on Twitter) I was pretty excited. Finally, something for us AdHeads to participate in. Other than yelling at party guests who carelessly mill around right in front of the TV, or stumble past it on their way to the ice chest. During epic moments in advertising history.</p>
<p>Yes, for those of us who up until shortly after 6:00 p.m. had no real clue which teams were playing, we would have our own game inside the game. </p>
<p>A reason to get excited other than those little party wieners or our game &#8220;squares&#8221; that used to be the only motivation to plant ourselves on a couch for five hours on a perfectly good Sunday.</p>
<p>So despite the fact that I was looking forward to the BrandBowl, I found myself invited to a Superbowl party where basically no one was paying attention to the commercials (heresy!) other than some quiet guy hiding in a corner behind a Macbook Pro&#8230; until he quickly dashed from the party around half-time mumbling something about having to go to work to deal with calls and comments related to two Superbowl spots his company produced. Or something. Whaaaa?? Unfortunately I didn&#8217;t get to have any geekversation with him because he left so quick. Geez, for all I know he was BrandBowling that whole time. </p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s what I was doing. My iPhone was fully charged and running pretty much the whole game. And let me tell you, I never had so much fun during a Superbowl.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the deal. It&#8217;s hard to see all the commercials when you&#8217;re BrandBowling! The network needs to come up with some scheduling plan next year that alternates great spots with lame spots. Because by nature, BrandBowling only allows you to watch every other commercial. </p>
<p>Watch commercial: 30 seconds.<br />
Tweet about the commercial: 30 seconds.<br />
Watch commercial: 30 seconds.<br />
Tweet about commercial: 30 seconds. </p>
<p>And this doesn&#8217;t include commenting to other BrandBowlers or responding to followers. Which can really eat up precious viewing time. And don&#8217;t get me started on how racing to tweet seriously limits the depth of your analysis. Those &#8220;in-the-moment&#8221; tweets aren&#8217;t quite as astute as what you might say when you watch the spots in a quiet room by yourself. I actually cringed at a couple of my tweets given a few seconds to reflect after the fact. But regardless, BrandBowl was awesome and kept me on the edge of my seat. </p>
<p>Needless to say, I barely saw the football game. </p>
<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/brandbowltweets.jpg" alt="brandbowltweets" title="brandbowltweets" width="571" class="aligncenter size-full" /></p>
<p>So given all of the impediments to unfettered participation (including my party host TURNING THE VOLUME DOWN DURING COMMERCIAL BREAKS!!) I&#8217;m already coming up with ways to improve my BrandBowl performance next year. Probably starting with some finger push-ups, typing classes, mission control computer set-up, and staying home from any Superbowl party so I can take full advantage of the DVR. And VOLUME CONTROL. </p>
<p>Or maybe I&#8217;ll watch the commercials in advance. Of course that would eliminate the fun and adrenaline of seeing spots for the first time as they roll across the TV screen. There&#8217;s just something magical about that. Not sure I want to give that up. It really added a greater level of excitement to the event.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s one of the reasons BrandBowl was so wildly popular. In the moment, you feel like the REAL game is the Brandbowl. And the Superbowl is just bathroom break filler until the next commercial rolls.</p>
<p>And then we&#8217;re back in the game!</p>
<p>BrandBowling is my new favorite contact sport. (Pun not intended). Thanks, Mullen and Radian6, Superbowls will never be the same.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Read the BrandForward reviews of the Superbowl spots!</span></h6>
<p> <strong><a href="http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/02/09/touchdown-or-smackdown-best-worst-ads-of-superbowl-2010/">Touchdown or Smackdown: Best &#038; Worst Ads of Superbowl 2010</a></strong></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandforward/~4/MQMp3BnPbMM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/02/10/brandbowl-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/02/10/brandbowl-2010/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Touchdown or Smackdown? Best &amp; Worst Ads of Superbowl 2010</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandforward/~3/kzUeuLvQ0vg/</link>
		<comments>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/02/09/touchdown-or-smackdown-best-worst-ads-of-superbowl-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Tripp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADVERTISING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRANDING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superbowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=1453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
What were the best and worst ads of Superbowl 2010? We&#8217;re not talking about the most outrageous or the most buzzed about or the most expensive. That&#8217;s easy. The hard stuff is coming up with a creative strategy that gets attention, starts conversation, and continues the work of building a consistent brand.
The best advertising creates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/superbwhite.jpg" alt="superbwhite" title="superbwhite" width="300" height="220" class="alignright size-full wp-image" /><br />
What were the best and worst ads of Superbowl 2010? We&#8217;re not talking about the most outrageous or the most buzzed about or the most expensive. That&#8217;s easy. The hard stuff is coming up with a creative strategy that gets attention, starts conversation, and continues the work of building a consistent brand.</p>
<p>The best advertising creates a connection between the brand and the consumer, like a neural pathway that opens communication. The best advertising leverages the soul of the brand and doesn&#8217;t abandon it for a temporary attention spike. </p>
<p>Which advertisers had the touchdowns? Which ones earned a smackdown? Here&#8217;s the BrandForward list of Superbowl 2010&#8217;s best and worst ads.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h3><span style="color: #000000;">Touchdown! Best Ads of Superbowl 2010</span></h3>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#1: Google: Parisian Love</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">In-house</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
I have to admit when I saw this spot during the game I was not impressed. Despite the occasional ribbing I give the company, I&#8217;m a fan of Google and was hoping it would school Yahoo! and Bing in what it means to be a search engine. </p>
<p>So you can imagine my dismay when I looked up from my Superbowl beer to see search terms and nondescript music. Yawwwwwn. Okay so I was at a Superbowl party. Not exactly the most ideal place for concentrating on ads. I didn&#8217;t even see the first two or three seconds of the ad, and by then they&#8217;d lost me. It didn&#8217;t help that the room got loud and people started heading to the snacks and beer (and walking in front of the TV) whenever subtle spots like Google came on. Of course the room got still and quiet and everyone was at full attention whenever spots from GoDaddy or Doritos were rolling. </p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m glad I took the time to go through the spots again. Because the Google ad was incredible. Simple, honest, unpretentious. Brand-building at its best.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#2: Chrysler: Dodge Charger (Man&#8217;s Last Stand)</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Wieden &#038; Kennedy &#8211; Portland, OR</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
This spot connects so deeply with its target consumer. Not only is it saying &#8220;Yeah, we feel your pain,&#8221; but it&#8217;s also subtly telling men that they better have a mean-looking muscle car or the world will think they&#8217;re completely whipped, probably doing a lot more than just carrying lip balm. We&#8217;re talking buying tampons. I love the subversive urgency this spot creates. I bet there were a lot of men waking up the next morning not so happy to be driving that minivan to work.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#3: Hyundai: Paint</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Innocean Worldwide Americas &#8211; Irvine, CA</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
Wow. Works of art are meant to last. The message is clear. I understand who Hyundai is and what the brand embodies. And cool, it has a soul. By now, the company&#8217;s 10-year warranty is pretty much common knowledge, and this gorgeous spot evolves that practical message into something more powerful and meaningful. Hyundai tells us it values its vehicles, takes pride in its craftsmanship, and does not build throwaway junk.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#4: Snickers: You&#8217;re Not You When You&#8217;re Hungry</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">BBDO &#8211; New York</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
In some circles, this spot isn&#8217;t getting much love. But it felt right to me. Granted, I haven&#8217;t seen another Snickers spot in quite awhile so maybe this is a departure from whatever else it is they&#8217;re doing. Well, I think this is what they should be doing. Maybe it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m not me when I&#8217;m hungry, or maybe it&#8217;s that I actually enjoy Betty White (Anyone see her in Lake Placid?). But I think this was a spot that capitalized on pretty much the only honestly good reason to grab a Snickers: When you&#8217;re hungry, you&#8217;re not yourself. </p>
<p>This spot connected the brand to human truth, found a way to make us laugh about it, and presented Snickers as a solution to a universal problem. You better believe the next time I get hungry and cranky I&#8217;m going to hear Betty White in my ear telling me to grab a Snickers. </p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#5: Homeaway: Hotel Hell Vacation</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Publicis in the West &#8211; Seattle</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
I&#8217;m a big fan of the Vacation movies. What can I say? I was a child of the 80s. I saw Vacation no fewer than 5 or 10 times. Christmas Vacation at least double that. So when I saw an aged Clark Griswold pop up on the screen, I knew exactly what they were selling: A vacation where everything doesn&#8217;t go wrong. What better way to demonstrate the perils of ill-prepared vacations than with the most iconic vacationer known to man? If the short version didn&#8217;t sell you, there&#8217;s a 13-minute mini-movie, aptly titled: &#8220;Hotel Hell Vacation.&#8221; Truckster on.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#6: Denny&#8217;s: Chicken Warning</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Goodby, Silverstein &#038; Partners &#8211; San Francisco</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
While Carmax went dramatically wrong with animal gags, Denny&#8217;s screaming chickens stole the show as they braced for Denny&#8217;s Free GrandSlam promotion. As the announcer says, &#8220;Great day to be an American. Bad day to be a chicken.&#8221; </p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#7: Cars.com</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">DDB &#8211; Chicago</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
Maybe it&#8217;s just that I&#8217;m a Wes Anderson fan and the &#8220;Timothy Richman&#8221; spot made me think of Rushmore, but I like the concept of connecting a story of confidence to the brand, and the clever backstory of Timothy, even though it did have a disappointing pay-off. All said and done, this is a concept that stays true to the brand&#8217;s core value. And has legs. Lots of them. Pretty close to brilliant. Just wish it had spent more time in the oven.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#8: Teleflora: Talking Flowers/Mr. Warmth</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">In-house</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
Someone will probably hit me for this, but I actually liked the Teleflora spot where it was assumed that getting cheap, boxed flowers means you&#8217;re probably dating a guy serving time in prison. I don&#8217;t honestly know how effective TV advertising is for the floral industry. Do guys buy flowers anymore? Do guys watch commercials about flower delivery services? Or maybe women order their own flowers and have them sent to the office? Regardless, it&#8217;s clear if you&#8217;re going to get someone flowers you better not buy on the cheap.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#9: Flo.tv: Moments</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Magner Sanborn &#8211; Spokane, WA &#038; Agency 3.0 &#8211; Los Angeles</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
Can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m a big fan of the &#8220;montage-as-ad,&#8221; but this one works. It takes us down memory lane and reminds us that TV allows us to experience great moments in history. And that we should keep watching because there will be more. And we should have a TV wherever we go so we don&#8217;t miss anything. Pretty effective.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#10: NFL: Best Fans on the Planet</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Grey &#8211; New York</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
Another montage ad. But the slow-mos, along with the emotive &#8220;Wake Up&#8221; by Arcade Fire, put you into the moment and almost make you forget the NFL is an evil empire. And has a lot of fans that don&#8217;t seem to mind.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h3><span style="color: #000000;">Smackdown! Worst Ads of Superbowl 2010<br />
</span></h3>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#1: Boost Mobile: Shuffle</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">180 &#8211; Los Angeles</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
New lows in advertising. And it&#8217;s not even GoDaddy. I swear the talk in the creative lounge had to be &#8220;Okay, so we don&#8217;t have a decent concept yet and the client wants a presentation, like yesterday. So hurry, let&#8217;s just pick the one that makes the least sense and has as little to do with the product as possible.&#8221; Or maybe they just drew from a hat. I don&#8217;t know. But I&#8217;ll tell you what&#8217;s wrong. This spot.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#2: Carmax: Dramatically Smart</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Boone Oakley &#8211; Charlotte, NC</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
There were a handful of these spots but I&#8217;m going to group them all together. If you saw one ad you saw them all. And you&#8217;ll probably wish you hadn&#8217;t. An animal sees a Carmax commercial and responds with a look of amazement. At first, I was confused and thought I&#8217;d missed something. Apparently not, because I watched the rest of the campaign. And they&#8217;re all the same gag. No pun intended.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#3: Bud Light</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Cannonball &#8211; St. Louis</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
Here&#8217;s another brandbackward campaign. What is Anheuser-Busch trying to communicate about Bud Light? The whole thing was a real train wreck. What does &#8220;Here We Go&#8221; mean? And why does &#8220;Drinkability&#8221; matter? And where did &#8220;Sure Sign of a Good Time&#8221; come from? It felt like there were three different creative teams working from three different continents with three different taglines suffering from three different mental disorders. It was like a creative free-for-all with no brand manager to keep everything on-message and on-brand. </p>
<p>Buckets of wacky, man-esque humor, including voice boxes, a house made of beer cans, and witty send-ups to Lost couldn&#8217;t save Bud Light from a lack of cohesiveness and no clear sense of brand. Focus, people, FOCUS. </p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#4: GoDaddy</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">In-house</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
This is what happens when 15 year-old boys are taught Final Cut Pro. And given a few million dollars.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#5: Budweiser</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">DDB &#8211; Chicago</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
Not impressed with this year&#8217;s showing for Budweiser. The &#8220;Clydesdale/Fence&#8221; spot had an extremely weak pay-off, and after a lengthy build-up I was expecting genius. Denied. I did have some respect for &#8220;Bridge&#8221; but only because I personally recognize the human tragedy that would befall a town deprived of its daily beer shipment. I hope they&#8217;re starting today coming up with concepts for the next Superbowl. Because this year was pretty much a fumble whale.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#6: Emerald Nuts and Pop Secret: Awesomer</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Goodby, Silverstein &#038; Partners &#8211; San Francisco</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
This 2-for-1 spot featured a Seaworld-style setting with an annoying show announcer training humans to act like Dolphins. To catch snacks. Yeah, I&#8217;d leave this one off the reel. But that tagline: Awesome + Awesome = Awesomer was pretty clever, and an effective way to combine two products in one ad. This is one of those ads that could have been &#8220;awesomer&#8221; if it just had an awesome concept to add to the awesome tagline.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#7: Doritos (campaign)</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Crowdsourced</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
The Doritos &#8220;Crash the Superbowl&#8221; contest resulted in a handful of spots that did pretty much nothing for Doritos from a branding standpoint, but propelled the world forward in connecting consumers to their favorite brands. Which despite the questionable ads, is a good thing. If more companies encouraged customers to take these kind of creative liberties and get more involved, we could see some really interesting  developments. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;d be cautious about letting the crowd hold the reigns of the brand. After watching the Doritos spots it&#8217;s clear that the creative that comes out of crowdsourcing can be a lot less sophisticated and strategic than what a brand steward would probably want to see on national television or another venue that gives consumers the impression that the brand is speaking in first person. Yes, the consumer owns the brand. And America is also a free country. But frankly, I don&#8217;t want to see my neighbors driving 150 mph down I-84. And I don&#8217;t necessarily want to see someone eating Doritos in a coffin.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#8:Taco Bell: It Rocks</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">DraftFCB &#8211; Irvine, CA</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
Um, no it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#9: Dockers: Men Without Pants</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">DraftFCB &#8211; San Francisco</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
A bunch of men in tighty whities. A spot rife with manulite and crotch shots. My eyes are still hurting. And to add insult to injury, the network saw fit to run two ads with partially unclothed men next to each other. I still can&#8217;t remember what the other spot was for. (Oh yeah. Careerbuilder.com, a spot I actually kind of liked.)</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h5><span style="color: #000000;">#10: Bridgestone: Whale of a Tale</span></h5>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"></span></p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">Richards Group &#8211; Dallas</span></h6>
<p><span style="color: #993333;"></span><br />
Brand-building spots these are not. If they would just replace the tires with beer, they&#8217;d be in business.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<p>So where is that witty Audi &#8220;Green Police&#8221; spot, the Kia Sorrento ad with the partying stuffed animals, and the Volkswagen PunchDub spot? These were highly creative spots that either failed at building their brand or compromised the brand in some way. Or grasped defeat from the hands of victory. They weren&#8217;t the best or the worst (although I loved the &#8220;Green Police&#8221; spot), but deserve some special mention. Look for the recap on these ads and more in my upcoming post: &#8220;Superbowl Brandfail.&#8221;</p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">If you&#8217;d like to tweet this post, here&#8217;s a trimmed link you can copy and paste: <strong>http://tr.im/touchdown</strong></span></h6></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandforward/~4/kzUeuLvQ0vg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/02/09/touchdown-or-smackdown-best-worst-ads-of-superbowl-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/02/09/touchdown-or-smackdown-best-worst-ads-of-superbowl-2010/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Apple iPad Really Worth It?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandforward/~3/5ubVB_eKVLQ/</link>
		<comments>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/01/29/is-the-apple-ipad-really-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Tripp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TECHNOLOGY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=1337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Wow. Wednesday. Big Day. Apple finally confirmed the rumors and unveiled its latest masterpiece. And now we have the iPad to add to our stack of devices that charge by the bedside every night. Well some of mine actually sleep in the bed with me. My iPhone has its own pillow. But move over. Because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/sjimgul.jpg" alt="sjimgul" title="sjimgul" width="300" height="220" class="alignright size-full wp-image" /><br />
Wow. Wednesday. Big Day. Apple finally confirmed the rumors and unveiled its latest masterpiece. And now we have the iPad to add to our stack of devices that charge by the bedside every night. Well some of mine actually sleep in the bed with me. My iPhone has its own pillow. But move over. Because it appears the days of me and my iPhone cavorting alone in our own little world are coming to a close. This has just become an open relationship. </p>
<p>Because I will have an iPad.</p>
<p>And it will be getting a pillow.</p>
<p>So how can we be so sure that the iPad is really worth getting hot and bothered about? How can we get excited, get our debit cards ready and holstered, when pretty much everything we&#8217;ve heard in the last 48 hours is that the iPad is nothing more than a glorified iPhone? </p>
<p>And with less functionality?</p>
<p>Oh, Apple. Can we really have faith in your &#8220;magical and revolutionary&#8221; new device that apparently lacks all the features we&#8217;ve come to know and love?</p>
<p>(Such as:)</p>
<li> Dedicated GPS chip</li>
<li> Flash </li>
<li> Verizon compatibility </li>
<li> Mac OS </li>
<li> Camera </li>
<li> High-capacity storage </li>
<li> Multi-tasking </li>
<li> USB </li>
<li> SD Card Slot </li>
<li> e-Ink </li>
<li> CD/DVD </li>
<li> 16:9 aspect ratio </li>
<li> HDMI </li>
<p> </br></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re inclined to believe the interwebs, the iPad:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2010/01/10_things_the_a.html;jsessionid=0ZJ35OXDFCK1FQE1GHOSKH4ATMY32JVN">&#8220;is missing a lot&#8221;</a></strong> </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://erictric.com/technology/more-reasons-why-the-ipad-sucks-and-you-shouldnt-buy-one">&#8220;sucks and you shouldn&#8217;t buy one&#8221;</a></strong> </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/ten-things-missing-from-the-ipad/">&#8220;is a giant iPhone&#8221;</a></strong> </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5458382/8-things-that-suck-about-the-ipad">&#8220;has some absolutely backbreaking failures&#8221;</a></strong></p>
<p>and </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQnT0zp8Ya4">&#8220;sounds like a F—ING tampon.&#8221;</a></strong></p>
<p>Heck, some are even saying a netbook (gasp!) is a<strong><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10443246-1.html?tag=digg"> better choice than the iPad.</a></strong>  </p>
<p>So with the realization that the iPad is covered in frosting but not fully baked, can we (and our debit cards) overlook what appears to be such glaring and fatal flaws and allow the liberation of $499+ from our checking accounts?</p>
<p>Yes. And I&#8217;ll tell you why. </p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s an Apple.</p>
<p>And if there&#8217;s one (or two) things history tells us about Apple, it&#8217;s that there will be a lot of critics. </p>
<p>And there will be a revolution. </p>
<p>The key reason the iPad is worth owning, despite its shortcomings, is because no matter what it lacks today, no matter which functional &#8220;oversights&#8221; the critics say will make it a lame duck or an irrelevant yet shiny toy&#8230; no matter&#8230; as the iPad evolves it&#8217;s pretty much guaranteed to exceed expectations. And most likely spark a user revolution that turns the iPad into a ubiquitous, can&#8217;t-live-without product that flies off shelves. </p>
<p>How do we know this?</p>
<p>The iPhone. Look back to when it was unveiled in 2007. Remember what it was lacking and what the critics were saying? It didn&#8217;t have GPS. It didn&#8217;t have MMS or 3G or downloadable apps. It didn&#8217;t have push notification or cut-and-paste or video recording. And we were walking to school uphill in the snow.</p>
<p>And lest we overlook the most heinous offense, it didn&#8217;t have Verizon.</p>
<p>But three years later, 75 million iPhones and iPod Touches have been sold, there have been more than 12 billion iPhone app downloads, and let us not forget the more than 125 million Apple borgs using the iTunes store.</p>
<p>Not bad for an irrelevant, shiny toy.</p>
<p>Sure, the first-generation iPad lacks some compelling features. Some essential features. But just like any long-term relationship, you have to accept some flaws in the beginning&#8230; overlook the mouth breathing&#8230; the outdated hair&#8230; questionable fashion choices. (And if you&#8217;re in New Jersey, the spray-on tan.) And have some faith in what could develop. </p>
<p>After 34 years and countless revolutionary ideas that have changed the way we connect with the world, Apple has earned at least that.</p>
<p>And certainly a little space on the pillow.</p>
<p>
<br /></br>
</p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">If you&#8217;d like to tweet this post, here&#8217;s a trimmed link you can copy and paste: <strong>http://tr.im/buyipad</strong></span></h6>
</p>
<p><em>(Statistics via Steve Jobs during Apple keynote on January 27, 2010. Story image from photo sharing site, imgur.com).</em></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandforward/~4/5ubVB_eKVLQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/01/29/is-the-apple-ipad-really-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/01/29/is-the-apple-ipad-really-worth-it/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Your Company Ready for a Brand Whisperer?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandforward/~3/cy8eBc4JEXc/</link>
		<comments>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/11/01/is-your-company-ready-for-a-brand-whisperer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Tripp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BRANDING]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=1156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
You watch Ghost Whisperer, right? I mean how could you not. It&#8217;s a great show. Jennifer Love Hewitt is adorable and entertaining to watch, and every episode is a new mystery that centers on communication with spirits in the afterlife. Well that and her cleavage. So yeah. Each week the show&#8217;s protagonist, Melinda Gordon, is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/brandwhisperer.jpg" alt="brandwhisperer" title="brandwhisperer" width="300" height="220" class="alignright size-full wp-image" /><br />
You watch Ghost Whisperer, right? I mean how could you not. It&#8217;s a great show. Jennifer Love Hewitt is adorable and entertaining to watch, and every episode is a new mystery that centers on communication with spirits in the afterlife. Well that and her cleavage. So yeah. Each week the show&#8217;s protagonist, Melinda Gordon, is faced with a supernatural challenge. Such as say, there&#8217;s a ghost randomly attacking people in the town square. A woman sees her deceased husband at the most inopportune times. People hear stuff. Things go missing. </p>
<p>Oh and there&#8217;s a roiling pit of hell directly underneath Melinda&#8217;s charming suburban antique shop. </p>
<p>Of course, all of these situations culminate in Melinda cheerfully solving a ghostly problem and helping a lost soul cross over into the light. In case it&#8217;s not obvious, Melinda has a special gift. She&#8217;s usually the only one who can actually see these ghosts and communicate with them. Without her clairvoyance, they&#8217;re destined to roam the Earth. Serving as imaginary friends and subject material for episodes of Ghost Hunters.</p>
<p>The whole reason I even bring up Ghost Whisperer is because of an impromptu conversation I had with a wise and intuitive family member while I was in Houston a few months ago. &#8220;Dee&#8221; was interested in hearing about my latest projects and clients, and the discussion evolved into my marketing philosophies and the branding process they eventually dovetailed into (with a huge thanks to <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/meredithroach/">@meredithroach</a></strong> a friend and former colleague who had formerly worked on the Southwest Airlines account at GSD&#038;M, and gave me vital guidance and clarity at just the right time!). </p>
<p>Well thanks to my afternoon with Dee, my eyes were opened to a really interesting concept relating to the part of my work I&#8217;m most passionate about, brand positioning, and why I&#8217;ve always been drawn to &#8220;counseling&#8221; companies with unresolved issues.</p>
<p>I know, I know. Brand Positioning. It sounds so traditional, so corporate. But I don&#8217;t see it that way. </p>
<p>When approached in the right spirit (no pun, seriously!) brand positioning provides an opportunity to discern the soul and the essence of a brand or a company. It allows the facilitator to absorb a lot of information. To experience the company as an energy, as opposed to an inanimate construct. To really get down to the core, to &#8220;feel&#8221; who the company is, why it exists, and what&#8217;s truly driving its existence. Going through a brand positioning workshop is a little like Melinda listening to the concerns of the ghost, understanding the issues of the living friend or relative, and coming up with the reason the ghost hasn&#8217;t crossed over, and what they&#8217;ll have to do to reconcile and reach the pearly gates.</p>
<p>Dee wanted to call it &#8220;spiritual business.&#8221; And I kind of liked that. It had a nice ring.</p>
<p>But I watch a lot of Ghost Whisperer. </p>
<p>So one day while Melinda was rescuing a repenting politician and releasing his angry attachment, it came to me: </p>
<p>&#8220;Every company and every brand needs a Brand Whisperer!&#8221;</p>
<p>So many companies have issues that plague them. I&#8217;ve worked with clients with painful personnel problems, clients with conflicting management views and opposing goals, still others bound by politics that were strangling the life out of the organization. Looking back, I&#8217;m starting to have some empathy for Melinda when she was bombarded with entities! </p>
<p>As the Brand Whisperer you have to absorb all of the facts and energies, you have to see things from all angles. You have to breathe in and let the company speak to you. You have to be a conduit. You have to move beyond the questionnaires and the checklists and the assumptions to reach the core truth&#8230; the foundation of what the brand or company embodies. </p>
<p>And determine the actions it needs to take in order to move forward into renewed purpose, increased growth, and internal harmony.</p>
<p>Every organization and every brand has the answers deep within. The ones that aren&#8217;t at their optimal growth and energy have just lost their way, lost touch with the original vision and passion that inspired the organization&#8217;s birth to begin with. Or sometimes they opened a new company, started providing a service, and never defined their true offering&#8230; and then couldn&#8217;t understand why sales became flat or new customers weren&#8217;t knocking down the door. </p>
<p>To get on track, it&#8217;s just a matter of rediscovering the core, getting the entire company in alignment, and developing an action plan for growth that&#8217;s consistent with the company&#8217;s soul.</p>
<p>This sort of &#8220;spiritual branding&#8221; is a deeply moving experience for everyone involved. I always tell clients before beginning a session to bring the Kleenex and be prepared for catharsis. Owning or managing a company that&#8217;s having problems with stability, profitability, internal issues, or brand identity can be draining. Many times that&#8217;s the reason a client agrees to go through the process. They want to grow, they want to resolve their operational problems, they want to maximize the impact of a tight marketing budget, they want to know why things are happening and how the company can move beyond current obstacles. </p>
<p>They want to see the light at the end of the tunnel.</p>
<p>Discovering a company&#8217;s core value unlocks a Rosetta Stone that can be leveraged across the company to heal, define, and inspire. When everyone in the company finally understands what they&#8217;re working toward and why they wake up every morning, it&#8217;s a powerful motivator and one of the most holistic, organic ways to grow a business from the inside out. While also increasing everyone&#8217;s level of cooperation and personal satisfaction.</p>
<p>Yes, let&#8217;s not get distracted here. Everyone certainly does wake up and go to work primarily for company revenue and personal financial gain. But without the spiritual component, taking into account that staff and employees need a sense of deep value in their work and that consumers need to feel good about who they do business with, there&#8217;s going to be a lack of positive feelings to propel the company forward. </p>
<p>Never forget that a company consists of the combined energy of the people working in it and the customers who interact with it. Without positive vibrations from within the company and from the hearts of consumers, the magic of energetic momentum will not exist. If you&#8217;re wondering if that&#8217;s esoteric chatter or a real concept, talk to the masters of brand energy, Apple and Southwest Airlines. They haven&#8217;t done too shabby with it.</p>
<p>To think of it in Ghost Whisperer terms: To achieve healthy and holistic growth, companies need to make sure they&#8217;re on the right &#8220;spiritual&#8221; path, connected with their core &#8220;energy,&#8221; and in touch with their &#8220;divine&#8221; purpose. </strong></p>
<p>Any more spiritual puns or references I missed? ;)</p>
<p>I have to thank Dee for giving me a gift that day while sitting on her couch: she helped me see that brand positioning isn&#8217;t some technical, robotic process that can be methodically performed. Someone can&#8217;t just assemble checklists and questionnaires and duplicate the experience. Just because someone knows what a core value is doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;ll uncover the right one. It&#8217;s a spiritual process, an enlightenment, that combines both business and spiritual aptitudes. A subtle communication between the Whisperer and the brand that leads to a deep understanding. And it can also be leveraged on an individual level by helping people find the core value of their own personal brands!</p>
<p>For companies, this understanding is the foundation for a marketing program that weaves the core value into every aspect of the operation. It answers questions, helps guide management into making values-based decisions, and serves as a guiding light for the entire organization. Releasing old ghosts and breathing new life.</p>
<p><strong>Why does cores values branding or &#8220;spiritual branding&#8221; even matter?</strong></p>
<p>Because consumers today are more educated, more savvy, have access to more options, AND THEY HAVE HIGHER EXPECTATIONS.</p>
<p>If a company isn&#8217;t consistent, honest, connective, and emotionally relevant to the consumer, they&#8217;ll move on to do business with another company. Consumers are drawn to what&#8217;s real and genuine. If a company isn&#8217;t living its core value, if it doesn&#8217;t offer an experience that &#8220;feels right,&#8221; consumers smell a fraud or don&#8217;t make a connection. They may not detect the reason on a tangible level, but their subtle discomfort causes them to look for other options. That&#8217;s why uncovering a company&#8217;s core value and leveraging and living it consistently will draw consumers into the brand community. They subconsciously crave being a part of experiences (and brands) that are aligned, balanced, and represent something higher.</p>
<p>And most importantly, when you begin to subtly and consistently integrate the core value into your marketing and operations, the energy of the company begins to shine. Your customers have a renewed sense of why they do business with you, and new customers feel an energetic pull toward you. </p>
<p>Customers are always drawn into the light.</p>
<p>Can you tell when a company has had the benefit of a Brand Whisperer? Some of the greatest brands have evidence of a Brand Whisperer at work. Beyond Apple and Southwest, think about Nissan&#8217;s &#8220;Shift.&#8221; Or Nike&#8217;s Just &#8220;Do&#8221; It. How about when you&#8217;re at Target you can Expect &#8220;More.&#8221; And what about Visa&#8217;s &#8220;Go&#8221; or HP&#8217;s &#8220;Invent.&#8221; Each of these companies discovered who they are at the core, why they exist, what value they provide beyond the tangible. And they&#8217;re leveraging that truth to build powerful brands.</p>
<p>Can you see the work of a Brand Whisperer in your favorite brands? Which companies have an undefinable positive energy? Which ones speak to you? </p>
<p>And is your company ready for its own Brand Whisperer?</p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">If you&#8217;d like to tweet this post, here&#8217;s a trimmed link you can copy and paste: <strong>http://tr.im/whisperer</strong></span></h6></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandforward/~4/cy8eBc4JEXc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/11/01/is-your-company-ready-for-a-brand-whisperer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/11/01/is-your-company-ready-for-a-brand-whisperer/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media is the New Tattoo</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandforward/~3/Fc5b4rznr3k/</link>
		<comments>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/10/26/social-media-is-the-new-tattoo-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Tripp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SOCIAL MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRANDING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tattoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=1102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in those halcyon days of high school my BFF Shannon started talking about getting a tattoo. A nice big one that no doubt was intended to shock her parents, get her officially banned from church, and seal her social identity as a true rebel. I remember briefly thinking how cool it would be to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/socialmediatattoo.jpg" alt="socialmediatattoo" title="socialmediatattoo" width="300" height="220" class="alignright size-full wp-image" />Back in those halcyon days of high school my BFF Shannon started talking about getting a tattoo. A nice big one that no doubt was intended to shock her parents, get her officially banned from church, and seal her social identity as a true rebel. I remember briefly thinking how cool it would be to get one, too. </p>
<p>That fantasy lasted a whole three minutes.</p>
<p>While visions of Led Zeppelin&#8217;s Swan Song angel may have briefly danced in my head (yes, I also thought I was a rebel) there was this little voice of reason that chose at that moment to scream rather loudly &#8220;DON&#8217;T DO ITTTTT!&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I wasn&#8217;t much of a rebel after all. My wonder years consisted of a series of close attachments to more audacious friends who I could live through vicariously. Heck, I wasn&#8217;t even cool enough to let my senior prom date wear a Zeppelin T-shirt under his jacket for fear we&#8217;d get thrown out. I even made him change. Some rebel I was.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if Shannon ever got that tattoo. At least during high school she didn&#8217;t have the requisite courage in the face of needles, didn&#8217;t have the $300, and had a lack of vehicle freedom that all conspired to stop her. Regardless, it was pretty fortunate. My father would&#8217;ve never allowed me within 100 miles of her for the rest of my natural life.</p>
<p>Fast forward &#8220;a few years.&#8221; (Aren&#8217;t euphemisms awesome?)</p>
<p>While getting a tattoo takes planning, a stuffed piggy bank, and the keys to an unguarded vehicle, social media carries some of the same qualities of a tattoo with none of the barriers to entry.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s compare:</p>
<p><strong>Tattoo:</strong><br />
Permanent, mostly irreversible, possibly a job killer. Captured evidence of questionable judgment at some point in the past. Even if it&#8217;s just a whimsical remnant of an indiscriminate youth, its current presence and visibility makes a statement that can&#8217;t be easily erased or ignored.</p>
<p><strong>Social Media:</strong><br />
Permanent, mostly irreversible, possibly a job killer. Captured evidence of questionable judgment at some point in the past. Even if it&#8217;s just a whimsical remnant of an indiscriminate youth, its current presence and visibility makes a statement that can&#8217;t be easily erased or ignored.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good thing social media wasn&#8217;t around back when Shannon and I were in high school or college. I perish the thought of what would have probably been questionably inappropriate blog postings following us some 20 or 30 years later. Do I really want the 17 year-old writer in me having any influence on what potential clients or employers are thinking about me today? Or what about the 22 year-old me that got more than a few letters to the editor published? Today, all that would be online. A part of my permanent record.</p>
<p>Baby Boomers, Generation X, and the early end of Gen Y got lucky that social media transparency didn&#8217;t come into vogue until just recently. We&#8217;ve all (for the most part) had the time to acquire the wisdom and experience that creates at least a little caution. </p>
<p><strong>But what about younger Gen Y and Millenials? </p>
<p>What about 10 year-olds with a Twitter account?</p>
<p>What about 13 year-olds with a MySpace?</p>
<p>What about parents creating baby Facebook pages and planning childrens&#8217; names around available URLs? </strong></p>
<p>Social media transparency has created a whole phenomenon that hasn&#8217;t had time to hit us yet. What happens when an entire generation that was &#8220;born online&#8221; (or has had an online presence since even middle school or junior high) is ready to be taken seriously? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s always been said &#8220;It&#8217;s not what you know, it&#8217;s who you know.&#8221; Well what happens when who you know knows everything there is to know?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like you&#8217;re writing an ongoing resume. That spans 10, 20, 30+ years. Gone are the days of carefully controlling a potential employer&#8217;s perception with two sheets of paper. Your identity is online and the only relevant pieces of information on that two-page resume are the two words at the top: your name.</p>
<p>Consider them googled.</p>
<p>The question now is what have you been adding to your social media tattoo? How many years have you been adding to it? Is it as carefully crafted as a traditional resume? Or is it a hodge podge of kegger photos, misogynist rants, and random tweets that allude to your life as a disgruntled employee? </p>
<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/lycwolf1.jpg" alt="lycwolf1" title="lycwolf1" width="571" class="aligncenter size-full" /></p>
<p>The most important thing we all have to remember about social media is that our tweets, posts, and comments come without CONTEXT.</p>
<p>Just because you have 2,100 tweets that are perfectly sane doesn&#8217;t mean an occasional F-bomb or a workplace rant will be forgiven by the employer who didn&#8217;t have the benefit of watching your stream every day for two years. They only get a quick snapshot and make a dozen assumptions about you based on what they find. </p>
<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/hatebosstweet.jpg" alt="hatebosstweet" title="hatebosstweet" width="571" class="aligncenter size-full" /></p>
<p>And oh yeah. Just because 99.999% of your Facebook photos are rated PG doesn&#8217;t mean a friended co-worker you&#8217;re competing with for a promotion won&#8217;t come across that &#8220;one time at band camp.&#8221; And anonymously forward it to your boss. An ill-timed reveal of the office pet&#8217;s well-concealed snarkiness or behind-the-scenes indiscretion might make an otherwise adoring boss think twice.</p>
<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/behavebad.jpg" alt="behavebad" title="behavebad" width="571" class="aligncenter size-full" /></p>
<p>Even though your potential clients and employers are human, too&#8230; and they should understand that no one is perfect&#8230; they can&#8217;t help but come to conclusions about you based on the contents of your social media presence. They don&#8217;t have the benefit of context and that&#8217;s what makes an innocent remark or photo so dangerous.</p>
<p>Yes, transparency and authenticity are essential to a rewarding online experience because those are the qualities that connect us to people and create real relationships. We should all strive to embrace transparency and be our authentic selves online. But there&#8217;s a fine line between being who we are and &#8220;letting it all hang out.&#8221; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s called discretion. </p>
<p>And discretion can live peacefully alongside authenticity and transparency. But it&#8217;s an art that takes time to master. And in the meantime there will be tweets we&#8217;d like to take back, blog posts we wish hadn&#8217;t published, and comments we hope aren&#8217;t seen out of context. </p>
<p>Just because we didn&#8217;t spend a couple of hours getting a tattoo doesn&#8217;t mean there&#8217;s not permanent, visible evidence that we don&#8217;t always make the best long-term decisions.</p>
<p>And in a lot of ways, social media is even more visible and permanent:</p>
<p>The biggest difference in a tattoo and social media is that a tattoo can be placed in hidden locations, reflecting a higher level of personal discretion and judgment, whereas social media by its very nature is public. Even Facebook or MySpace privacy settings can&#8217;t stop someone who&#8217;s determined. </p>
<p><strong>Social media is the new tattoo. And no amount of opaque make-up or layers of clothing can conceal it.</strong></p>
<p>What are some words of wisdom you&#8217;d share with today&#8217;s kids who are embarking on social media? Do you think they&#8217;d be able to understand why we talk about the importance of discretion? Or would they think we&#8217;re hopelessly lame and old school, just trying to keep them from having fun and expressing themselves?</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what these new tattoos eventually look like. And to what lengths users will go to have them removed.</p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">If you&#8217;d like to tweet this post, here&#8217;s a trimmed link you can copy and paste: <strong>http://tr.im/newtattoo</strong></span></h6>
</p>
<p>A quick note of thanks to Wayne Kurtzman (@WayneNH) who first picked up on my &#8220;social media is the new tattoo&#8221; quote earlier this year and wrote a great post about it. If you have some time, take a look at his <strong><a href="http://tr.im/SMtattoo/">post</a></strong> on the topic.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandforward/~4/Fc5b4rznr3k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/10/26/social-media-is-the-new-tattoo-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/10/26/social-media-is-the-new-tattoo-2/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>BrandForward Videos</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandforward/~3/ri0LTH6x01o/</link>
		<comments>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/10/20/brandforward-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Tripp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VIDEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADVERTISING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRANDING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARKETING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hitler Responds to iPad
Watching the Apple keynote updates while Steve Jobs was unveiling the iPad was a thrilling experience. Finally the day had come when we could let go of Kindle and netbook dreams and focus on a superior product with greater functionality, features, and style. Until this sobering video reminded us that while the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hitler Responds to iPad<br />
</strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana">Watching the Apple keynote updates while Steve Jobs was unveiling the iPad was a thrilling experience. Finally the day had come when we could let go of Kindle and netbook dreams and focus on a superior product with greater functionality, features, and style. Until this sobering video reminded us that while the iPad is covered in frosting, it isn&#8217;t yet fully baked.  (January 2010)<br />
<br />
<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lQnT0zp8Ya4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lQnT0zp8Ya4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
<p>
<br />
</br><br />
<br />
</br>
</p>
<p><strong>Apple: Mac vs. PC Broken Promises<br />
</strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana">It was hard to leave that Verizon &#8220;There&#8217;s a Map For That&#8221; spot on the home page last week, but it was just that good. Fortunately, Apple came out with a handful of new Mac vs. PC spots in response to the Windows 7 launch. No explanation necessary. Pure awesomeness. (October 2009)<br />
<br />
<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YCbYTrYD5y8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BpOvzGiheOM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
<p>
<br />
</br><br />
<br />
</br>
</p>
<p><strong>Verizon: There&#8217;s a Map for That<br />
</strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana">The Apple Fangirl in me cringed the first time I saw this Verizon 3G spot. My beloved iPhone being denigrated? Ah, but who can deny the clever use of irony. It&#8217;s a brilliant exercise in branding. Verizon stays true to its personality while taking an epic jab at Apple and AT&#038;T. More advertising should have this kind of creative/strategic convergence. (October 2009)<br />
<br />
<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YCbYTrYD5y8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YCbYTrYD5y8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
<p>
<br />
</br><br />
<br />
</br>
</p>
<p><strong>The Economist: Shift Happens<br />
</strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana">This is the latest &#8220;Shift Happens&#8221; video by XPLANE in conjunction with Economist. Launched September 23rd on YouTube. Thought provoking facts that give insight into the future of connecting with consumers. And they win points by quoting Ray Kurzweil. A must-see. (September 2009)<br />
<br />
<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C2jDOkzrVew&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C2jDOkzrVew&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
<p>
<br />
</br><br />
<br />
</br>
</p>
<p><strong>Buick Lacrosse<br />
</strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana">Are car commercials the new economic barometer? This Buick Lacrosse spot moves away from the serious tone of recent car commercials and steps back into the consumer experience: the connection, emotion, and self-perception. It still retains the responsibility aspect, but embraces the personal connection to a brand. When car companies ease off the austere practicality message, could it be a sign of positive economic change? (September 2009)</p>
<p>
<br />
<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bYiMiZzYTvY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bYiMiZzYTvY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
<p>
<br />
</br><br />
<br />
</br>
</p>
<p><strong>Sears Blue Crew: Brett Favre<br />
</strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana">The Brett Favre Sears commercial that aired on August 22nd is a great example of how celebrity brand endorsements should be approached. There&#8217;s a clear connection between Favre&#8217;s professional indecision and Sears&#8217; ability to help the indecisive. Brilliant. (August 2009)<br />
<br />
<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pz7P0yJErOw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pz7P0yJErOw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
<p>
<br />
</br><br />
<br />
</br>
</p>
<p><strong>State Farm &#8220;I&#8217;ll Be There&#8221;<br />
</strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana">Television as a medium is a one-way communication. Brands can engage the consumer with a two-way bond by connecting on an emotional level with truth, passion, and sincerity. This State Farm spot featuring a timely Jackson Five &#8220;I&#8217;ll Be There&#8221; achieves. (August 2009)</p>
<p>
<br />
<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_fW8jMWiLXo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_fW8jMWiLXo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandforward/~4/ri0LTH6x01o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/10/20/brandforward-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/10/20/brandforward-videos/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>9 Ways Social Media Eliminates Gatekeepers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandforward/~3/8HhjuXaFZ5I/</link>
		<comments>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/10/20/9-ways-social-media-eliminates-gatekeepers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Tripp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SOCIAL MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=1018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the spirit of Halloween, let&#8217;s turn our attention away from the happy, bubbly things of Summer and focus now on one of the most ominous figures ever conjured. 
The Grim Reaper? Nope. 
Freddy Krueger? Nuh, uh.
Al Sharpton? (Surprisingly, no.)
Good guesses, all. But the evil of which I speak is a much more commonplace entity. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/gatekeeper.jpg" alt="gatekeeper" title="gatekeeper" width="300" height="220" class="alignright size-full wp-image" />In the spirit of Halloween, let&#8217;s turn our attention away from the happy, bubbly things of Summer and focus now on one of the most ominous figures ever conjured. </p>
<p>The Grim Reaper? Nope. </p>
<p>Freddy Krueger? Nuh, uh.</p>
<p>Al Sharpton? (Surprisingly, no.)</p>
<p>Good guesses, all. But the evil of which I speak is a much more commonplace entity. But whose scary, intimidating presence is wholly undesirable all the same. Today, we shall shield our eyes and protect small children from: </p>
<p>(cue creepy organ music)</p>
<p><strong>The Gatekeeper.</strong></p>
<p>The person who controls access to the things you desire most.</p>
<p>Money, jobs, audience, advancement, influence, information.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re talking about the human resources manager who decides if your resume gets on the desk of the person who could actually hire you, or a one-way express ticket to the round file. The newspaper editor who decides if your prose is one of the few to be published. The receptionist at the doctor&#8217;s office who decides if your gaping head wound warrants a race to the emergency room.  </p>
<p>The co-op board. The bouncer. The book publisher. The soup nazi. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s no surprise that the concept of a gatekeeper sends cold chills down lots of spines. The gatekeeper subjectively decides your value, your worth, and whether your contribution or presence is wanted or unwanted. </p>
<p>Ouch.</p>
<p>And to make matters worse, gatekeeper decisions are based on their own personal preferences, preconceived notions, time constraints, and political objectives. Or how long they were stuck in traffic. And by the very nature of their position they don&#8217;t have to explain any of it. Not a lick. Standing guard at the gate, they hold the keys to everything you want. </p>
<p>They wield. The ax.</p>
<p>Scary, huh?</p>
<p>Maybe Target has a viable candidate for replacing those illegal alien costumes.</p>
<p>Hmmm. But wait. Things actually aren&#8217;t looking so good for the gatekeeper these days. </p>
<p><strong>Thanks to internet search and social media.</strong></p>
<p>Gatekeepers act as a funnel, restricting the flow of information and access. That&#8217;s because all the things you want were typically hidden and protected behind a big, rusty gate. There was too much of you, and too little of what (or who) you wanted. But in the new world, our path to getting those things has evolved.</p>
<p>The whole purpose of internet search and social media is to provide unfettered access to people and information. If everyone still wanted gatekeepers and believed that restricted access was a good thing, or if we wanted to be spoon-fed information and opinions through a funnel, Google search wouldn&#8217;t be eclipsing newspapers, Microsoft wouldn&#8217;t have bothered to pour millions into Bing, blogs wouldn&#8217;t have any readers, and YouTube wouldn&#8217;t be taking over television. </p>
<p>I agree with Edward Boches in his recent <strong><a href="http://edwardboches.com/do-we-still-need-the-gatekeepers/">gatekeeper post</a></strong> that many gatekeepers, such as newspaper and magazine editors, have earned the right to pass judgment through years of experience in their field. They have and they do. But let&#8217;s face it, there&#8217;s only one New York Times. And one Boston Globe. And one Wall Street Journal. And only one person at a time who holds the esteemed titles of publisher or editor at any given time. But there are probably thousands of people with equally valid knowledge and experience. I want to hear from them, too. And if it wasn&#8217;t for internet search and social media, their valuable knowledge and perspectives would be largely hidden. </p>
<p>Gatekeeped into anonymity.</p>
<p>Before the ubiquity of social media, the powers that be decided what got through and what didn&#8217;t. They had the exposure, and also the power to expose. Information didn&#8217;t get broadcast or printed, unless as the gatekeeper, they approved it. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it. That&#8217;s a ton of centralized power. Sure, it was by necessity. There was a limited venue. A couple dozen printed pages. Or a 30-minute newscast. It might have been necessary, but was it honestly a good thing?</p>
<p>And what about trying to get through the HR department, or past the doctor&#8217;s office receptionist, or around a publishing house?</p>
<p>Good times.</p>
<p><strong>So, are the gatekeepers still needed?</strong></p>
<p>Bring on the money, jobs, audience, advancement, influence, information! We all circumvent the gatekeepers on a regular basis, and the results are the ability to proactively drive our own personal advancement. Social media, internet search, and technology have created a perfect storm for individual power and nearly unfettered access.</p>
<p><strong>9 Ways Social Media Eliminates Gatekeepers:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Getting a Great Job</strong><br />
No need to worry about getting through the HR manager anymore. The person who has the real authority to hire you probably writes a blog, is on Twitter, contributes to online articles, and has a lot of personal information floating around that you can process to relevantly connect and get seen as a tangible asset, not just another resume.</p>
<p><strong>Gaining Public Awareness</strong><br />
Instead of waiting for the local paper to write a story about your cause or hoping the local TV station covers your event, everyone&#8217;s doing an end-run: Blogging it, starting Facebook groups, YouTube-ing it, tweeting it, and using any number of social media tactics that allow for immediate exposure. </p>
<p><strong>Publishing a Book</strong><br />
The resources for self-publishing are numerous, and it seems like everyone has an e-book these days. Not to mention Amazon&#8217;s new self-publishing service <strong><a href="http://www.createspace.com/">CreateSpace</a></strong> that will print your books one at a time as they sell. </p>
<p><strong>Becoming a Writer, Columnist, Commentator</strong><br />
So many people dream of being a writer, but before the internet there were limited options. And of course, they all involved begging a gatekeeper to get you an interview with an editor, publisher, or news director. Today, everyone has the opportunity to create a blog or participate on someone else&#8217;s. Instead of waiting for the editor of a major newspaper to decide if your comment merits printing, you can comment directly to the article online. And if they don&#8217;t allow commenting, there&#8217;s sure to be a popular &#8220;parasite&#8221; blog (or maybe we should call it a &#8220;para site&#8221;) where your comment will reach an audience already interested in the topic. Your ability to turn this into a career is limited only by your drive, talent, and passion.</p>
<p><strong>Being a Talk Show Host</strong><br />
For anyone who ever dreamed of being a disc jockey on a radio station, an MTV veejay, a TV pundit, or a talk show host, those positions have always been extremely limited in number and getting an interview? Nearly impossible. Entry level? Forget it. Someone has to die first. But today, anyone can host a podcast, create an online talk show, and build an audience.</p>
<p><strong>Being an Actor, Filmmaker, or Celebrity</strong><br />
People are writing their own films and distributing them on YouTube. And getting a zillion views. People are streaming live video, letting viewers follow their lives in real-time or episodically. Famous directors are creating interactive shows where they have freedom from the studio gatekeepers (more on that later). And becoming a celebrity? Since the rise of social media (with some props to reality TV), everybody is a somebody.</p>
<p><strong>Getting New Customers</strong><br />
In the business-to-business world, salespeople have to scratch and claw to gain access to decision-makers. But with social media, every minute you invest in building a relationship with a decision-maker is a minute well spent. And decision makers are generally happy to connect, especially with those who share their interests. Or run in the same social media circles. When you have something valuable to offer and believe in building relationships vs. building accounts, your days of cold calling (and trying to wriggle past gatekeepers) are over.</p>
<p><strong>Getting a College Education</strong><br />
Competition to get into the leading universities is fierce. Twenty years ago if you couldn&#8217;t get into a top technology or business school, you couldn&#8217;t get access to the program at all. Today, <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCourseWare">open courseware</a></strong> gives anyone the chance to learn the same thing current students are learning. Okay, this isn&#8217;t for everyone because self-directed learning isn&#8217;t the path of least resistance. But for those who didn&#8217;t have access to top schools for whatever reason, the information is no longer a mystery wrapped in a riddle hiding behind an ivory tower. You might not get the diploma, but in our <strong><a href="http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/08/12/essential-skills-for-exponential-times/">exponential future</a></strong> where individual inventiveness and quality connections will rule the day, your application of knowledge will be far more valuable than the paper proof that says you were exposed to the knowledge. (Except to the gatekeeper. Which you&#8217;re circumventing anyway, right?)</p>
<p><strong>Gaining Access to Information</strong><br />
There&#8217;s so much healthcare information and diagnosis apps online that patients can now understand their symptoms better and make first-response decisions without being forced to obtain all their information in an office setting. And if your HMO doctor isn&#8217;t giving you enough feedback or doesn&#8217;t readily mention costly treatments, patients can go home and access that information and take a more proactive and informed role in their health. This also applies to law, real estate, travel, and pretty much anything else that used to require making an appointment and only getting limited access to information. </p>
<p>We live in some pretty awesome times. Getting what you want and living your dreams is now dependent primarily on your own desire and personal motivation. The tools and opportunities are all available. The gatekeepers may still be around. But just like the Grim Reaper without that ominous scythe, they just don&#8217;t scare us much anymore. </p>
<p>Can you think of some gatekeepers that are still around? How are they standing between you and the things you want?</p>
<p>Are there any other ways that social media and access to information have eliminated the gatekeepers in your life? </p>
<h6><span style="color: #993333;">If you&#8217;d like to tweet this post, here&#8217;s a trimmed link you can copy and paste: <strong>http://tr.im/nogatekeeper</strong></span></h6>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandforward/~4/8HhjuXaFZ5I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/10/20/9-ways-social-media-eliminates-gatekeepers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/10/20/9-ways-social-media-eliminates-gatekeepers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Yahoo! Anthem Commercial</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandforward/~3/49ylLEGSoAY/</link>
		<comments>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/09/28/the-yahoo-anthem-commercial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Tripp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[REVIEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADVERTISING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRANDING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARKETING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was looking forward to seeing what Yahoo! had devised as a way to give itself an infusion of zombie magic. This was an incredible opportunity to up the ante, to prove Yahoo! is not destined for the .comortuary. 
Turns out, the new Yahoo! Anthem spot is driving me crazy. Literally. I haven&#8217;t decided if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking forward to seeing what Yahoo! had devised as a way to give itself an infusion of zombie magic. This was an incredible opportunity to up the ante, to prove Yahoo! is not destined for the .comortuary. </p>
<p>Turns out, the new Yahoo! Anthem spot is driving me crazy. Literally. I haven&#8217;t decided if it&#8217;s triggered my latent ADD or a random grand mal seizure. </p>
<p>After watching this visual frankenfeast, it sort of feels like Yahoo! is making a desperate last-ditch effort to wriggle its decaying hand up through the dirt from beyond the grave. Presenting us with a handful of wilted daisies.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not dead yet!&#8221;</p>
<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MqbaZcX67L0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MqbaZcX67L0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></p>
<p>Let me be fair. It is a beautiful spot to behold. Sweeping cinematography, vibrant colors, lush scenes, dynamic integration of cultures and people. It&#8217;s obvious someone in the mix knew what they were doing. Unfortunately, that person was not in front of the client. Or in the strategy meetings. Or in concept refinement. Or even playing Guitar Hero in the agency break room. </p>
<p>The spot wants to be all about &#8220;you,&#8221; but in a desperate grab for anything in sight it misses the mark. It&#8217;s not about YOU at all. It&#8217;s about Yahoo! and what you represent to the company: </p>
<p>A whole mess of people doing a lot of different, pretty things. </p>
<p>Where is the personal connection with the viewer? Where is the emotional engagement with the product? Where&#8217;s the promise that makes me want to add Yahoo! back to my Safari bookmarks bar? </p>
<p>Instead of feeling any connection, it felt like I was listening to the hurried recitation of an overzealous product brochure. The sad thing is, any of the gazillion scenes in this spot could have had impact if they were presented individually, if the viewer was allowed to connect with a single, passionate experience. This was one time when the final product was not greater than the sum of its parts. Quite the opposite.</p>
<p>And yeah. They couldn&#8217;t even get the grammar right. (Who&#8217;s checking this stuff?) When I want to go farther, I&#8217;ll fill up my car with gas. When I want to go further, I&#8217;ll double-check the script on my next million dollar ad spot.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your take on the Yahoo! Anthem spot? Love it or hate it? Awful or amazing? What worked for you, what didn&#8217;t? Was this the best approach for energizing the Yahoo! brand?</p>
<p>Okay, &#8220;energizing&#8221; may not be the right term. I&#8217;m still a bit dizzy.</p>
<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/themes/inove/img/yahooblogtweet.jpg" alt="yahooblogtweet" title="yahooblogtweet" alignleft size-full" /></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandforward/~4/49ylLEGSoAY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/09/28/the-yahoo-anthem-commercial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/09/28/the-yahoo-anthem-commercial/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Washed Out: Homespun Music Seals Record Industry Fate</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandforward/~3/UB8Yx4w_drI/</link>
		<comments>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/09/24/washed-out-homespun-music-seals-record-industry-fate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Tripp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[REVIEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It&#8217;s what Trent Reznor&#8217;s been trying to do. It&#8217;s what Radiohead is getting close to doing. It&#8217;s what a 26 year-old guy making synthpop tracks out of his bedroom at his parents&#8217; home in rural Georgia has done. 
Prove that the world is flat. The music world, that is.
Ernest Greene, the sole musician of Washed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/themes/inove/img/washedoutphoto.jpg" alt="washedoutphoto" title="washedoutphoto" width="300" height="220" class="alignright" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s what Trent Reznor&#8217;s been trying to do. It&#8217;s what Radiohead is getting close to doing. It&#8217;s what a 26 year-old guy making synthpop tracks out of his bedroom at his parents&#8217; home in rural Georgia has done. </p>
<p>Prove that the world is flat. The music world, that is.</p>
<p>Ernest Greene, the sole musician of Washed Out, was just another Southern boy reflecting on the state of the economy after graduating from college, moving back into the parents&#8217; house to save money. Oh, and turning out one of the most magical albums in years. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t hurt that its artistic purity hasn&#8217;t been spoiled by six-figure producers, million-dollar equipment, and a soul pact with the recording industry.</p>
<p>One of my favorite tracks on the Life of Leisure EP is &#8220;Feel it all around.&#8221; It&#8217;s got this haunting, 80&#8217;s energy that makes you want to spend the weekend curled up watching Sixteen Candles, with the occasional intermission to go running slow motion through wispy blades of grass.</p>
<p>Check it out on iTunes. Close your eyes. Feel something.</p>
<p>Since Greene just finished his album and released it about a week ago, he hasn&#8217;t had a lot of spare time to produce YouTube videos for his sparkling gems. But in a move that seems almost prescient, fans of Washed Out are stitching the music to animatics, static photos, and screen savers and posting them to YouTube. Hard to tell where &#8220;customers own the brand&#8221; stops and crowdsourcing begins. </p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wDniFWp3jPA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wDniFWp3jPA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p>

</p>
<p>This video for the song &#8220;New Theory&#8221; is a little rudimentary, but give a few weeks and I bet we&#8217;ll start to see these fan videos increasing in production value and complexity. </p>
<p>Like this one from filmmaker Chase Heavener found on Vimeo:</p>
<p><object width="400" height="225"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6692499&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6692499&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="225"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/6692499"></p>
<p>It&#8217;s exciting to think of the future&#8230; the intersection of independently-released musical genius and the passionate creativity fans add to it. Considering there&#8217;s no RIAA standing between the fan and the art, it allows for real engagement. And that&#8217;s where the magic begins. Consumers fleeing an over-commercialized world would rather see a raw, genuine take on the music, experiencing it through the eyes of an everyman as opposed to watching a multi-million dollar MTV creation. Call it the exponential result of reality TV.</p>
<p>Whoa. </p>
<p>The implications stretch way beyond music. How will increasing consumer creativity and active involvement change the future of advertising? Will the customer eventually own crowdsourcing outright? And will brands be willing to let go even more than they do now? Do they have a choice? </p>
<p>Maybe we should ask the recording industry how that all went for them. When a 26 year-old boy-next-door can whip out an epic album in a couple of months, and release it without mountains of red tape and industry bureaucracy, something compelling is on the horizon.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandforward/~4/UB8Yx4w_drI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/09/24/washed-out-homespun-music-seals-record-industry-fate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/09/24/washed-out-homespun-music-seals-record-industry-fate/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Social Media Tug of War</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandforward/~3/3b_qNmcIkB8/</link>
		<comments>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/09/01/the-social-media-tug-of-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Tripp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SOCIAL MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[account planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRANDING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARKETING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which side are you on?
You know what I mean. There&#8217;s two distinct camps. There&#8217;s the marketing purists who grab claim to social media like it was an Oscars goodie bag. And then there&#8217;s the specialists, struggling to wrest away the social media prize, hoping to get out from under stuffy marketing&#8217;s death grip once and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://michelletripp.com/wp-content/uploads/socialtugofwar.jpg" alt="socialtugofwar" title="socialtugofwar" width="300" height="220" class="alignright size-full wp-image" />Which side are you on?</p>
<p>You know what I mean. There&#8217;s two distinct camps. There&#8217;s the marketing purists who grab claim to social media like it was an Oscars goodie bag. And then there&#8217;s the specialists, struggling to wrest away the social media prize, hoping to get out from under stuffy marketing&#8217;s death grip once and for all.</p>
<p>You see it all over the internet. A constant tug of war. Who owns social media? Who should be managing social media? Is social media a part of public relations? Or is it account planning? Or maybe it&#8217;s a broadcast medium? Or maybe it&#8217;s just some trick cooked up by bored Gen Y&#8217;ers as a way to look busy at their desk when they can&#8217;t be texting on their phones.</p>
<p>Lately I&#8217;ve come across some <strong><a href="http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/08/09/social-media-so-easy-a-caveman-can-do-it/">comments </a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.walteradamson.com/2009/09/american-cancer-societ-facebook.html">articles </a></strong>that question whether marketing and branding are dead, and ask where social media belongs in the grand scheme of things.</p>
<p><strong>What is Social Media?</strong><br />
In <strong><a href="http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/08/09/social-media-so-easy-a-caveman-can-do-it/">Social Media: So Easy a Caveman Can Do It </a></strong>I originally referred to social media as a marketing discipline, I think it&#8217;s probably more accurate to call it a function within the discipline of marketing. This establishes a hierarchy. Social media is not a discipline unto itself. It will always be inextricably linked to marketing because:</p>
<p>The global objective of social media is the exact same as marketing: Selling. </p>
<p>To directly sell, to assist a sale, or to influence sales. Before, during, and after. The ultimate purpose, when in the context of any sort of brand communication, is to sell. Not in a blatant, leisure suit kind of way. But in a genuine, connecting sort of way. </p>
<p>Whether it&#8217;s a national CPG brand attempting to build a connection to current and potential customers, or a job hunter using social media to sell their value to future employers. Or Tila Tequila selling her persona on MySpace for social currency. Social media is a tool for selling. It&#8217;s an innovative method to sell an idea, a connection, a product, a person, a belief. Or even just to sell trust and affinity. </p>
<p>Yeah, I hate the word &#8220;sell.&#8221; It feels so anti-social media. But that&#8217;s the authentic reality.</p>
<p>Some social media practitioners still argue that social media is separate from marketing. Mostly because marketing in a lot of companies has sucked for awhile and SM practitioners feel that marketing supervision cramps their style. But given the same global objective, would it make sense for a company to have two separate departments trying to achieve the same goal, with two different and equal leaders? That would be the equivalent of hiring two CEOs. If one is doing their job right, the other is redundant at best, a divisive force at worst. Marketing gets a bad rap as it is. The last thing the industry needs is a tug of war between two internal factions that basically agree on the same ultimate goal, but just want to battle for control and the satisfaction of being &#8220;right.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds a little like a holy war. Or the WWF. Neither of which ever really ends all that well.</p>
<p><strong>Is Marketing Dead?</strong><br />
Traditional marketing has been a one-way communication, and social media has opened the gates to real two-way communication. If a marketer believes they can continue to send messages out into the ether in hopes that consumers will follow like lemmings, they&#8217;re missing the value of social media. And they&#8217;re missing the evolution of marketing. Marketing is not dead. It&#8217;s just in the process of changing. Social media doesn&#8217;t make marketing irrelevant. It forces marketing to dynamically change, to become more relevant, effective, and responsive. Social media gives marketing the opportunity to become more sophisticated, powerful, dynamic, and subtle. It helps marketing become what it was meant to be. To say marketing is dead in an attempt to elevate social media is like sawing off an arm of a still breathing body before hammering the nails in the coffin. Is marketing dead? No. But the traditional marketer that doesn&#8217;t evolve quickly is an endangered species for sure.</p>
<p><strong>Is Branding Dead?</strong><br />
To assume branding no longer has a function because the consumer has control of the brand message through social media assumes that branding is linear. When done correctly, branding is multi-dimensional, powerful, and connective on multiple levels. To believe that branding is dead is to believe that a company can no longer steer its own ship. Or communicate proactively with the customer. Because that&#8217;s what branding is about. Communication. Branding isn&#8217;t dead. It&#8217;s more alive than ever. It&#8217;s so alive that it just had its peanut butter collide with social media&#8217;s chocolate. Something new, interesting, and enduring has been born. A more responsive form of branding.</p>
<p><strong>Is Social Media a Broadcast Medium?</strong><br />
Social media is both marketing and medium. The confusion has to do with its multiple purposes and one generalized name. It would be a lot clearer to everyone if &#8220;social media&#8221; referred to the points of consumer contact (the medium), and &#8220;social marketing&#8221; was used to refer to the practice of social media marketing development (marketing). But as a community, we haven&#8217;t yet semantically clarified the two.</p>
<p><strong>Whose Responsibility is Social Media?</strong><br />
The execution of social marketing belongs to everyone. To the Marketing Director. To the Public Relations Specialist. To the CEO, the janitor, and the interns. To your customers. To your best friends. And yes, even to your nemesis. Ultimately everyone connected to your brand in any way is going to be participating in social media on behalf of your brand. Whether you authorize it or not.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s particularly important to have social media managed by someone who understands marketing, branding, and corporate strategy, as well as emerging media. It&#8217;s not just about knowing how to engage a community online, it&#8217;s also about having the ability to spread the brand gospel throughout the entire organization and develop an inclusive culture that encourages employees to be advocates for the brand.   So that everyone understands what&#8217;s going on and can more effectively communicate it everywhere they go, and with whomever they engage. Whether it&#8217;s on Facebook or in the produce section of Whole Foods. </p>
<p>This is the way it should have been done before social media and it&#8217;s still the way to do it. </p>
<p>The greatest companies have actually been practicing it for a long time and have healthy brands because of it. Whenever I&#8217;m asked about my favorite brands, I always bring up Herb Kelleher and Southwest Airlines. There&#8217;s a brand that got social media before social media got the internet. Southwest Airlines is an incredible example of why marketing and branding are still alive and well, and will flourish with social media. At the core of brand communication, whether it&#8217;s on Twitter or in the aisle of an airplane, is connection at an honest level that inspires the customer to become an evangelist. </p>
<p>Southwest Airlines proved you don&#8217;t need Facebook plug-ins or iPhone apps to build a brand. You just need human connection. Consistent and authentic.</p>
<p>So now that we have tons of new tools that marketers didn&#8217;t have 10 or 20 years ago, doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s time to divide the marketing community into the technologically advanced and the traditional. Everyone who has the opportunity within a company to be a unifying force  should aim to strengthen the marketing function, instead of looking for ways to prove that traditional marketing is no longer relevant.</p>
<p>Instead of the social media tug of war, it&#8217;s time for marketing and social media to join the same team. Be a supportive force in the evolution of marketing as a whole, and focus not on the fight, but on propelling brands forward.</p>
<p>Everyone is here for the same goal. The rope will move a lot easier if we&#8217;re all pulling it from the same side.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandforward/~4/3b_qNmcIkB8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/09/01/the-social-media-tug-of-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2009/09/01/the-social-media-tug-of-war/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
