<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>Brand Rants</title>
    
    <link rel="hub" href="http://hubbub.api.typepad.com/" />
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-1611610</id>
    <updated>2010-03-08T16:37:50+01:00</updated>
    <subtitle>Making sense of strategic marketing and brand development in  a web 2.0 world. </subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/brandrants/QXkf" /><feedburner:info uri="brandrants/qxkf" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry>
        <title>Embrace Life: the marketing power of positive</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~3/68oANKE-Yfg/embrace-life-the-marketing-power-of-positive.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/2010/03/embrace-life-the-marketing-power-of-positive.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2010-03-08T16:50:03+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55168107b883301310f7b5532970c</id>
        <published>2010-03-08T16:37:50+01:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-08T16:37:50+01:00</updated>
        <summary>Negative can be funny. Negative can be edgy. But if you really want to build brand equity with your marketing communication — embrace the positive. Embrace Life shows us how. </summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean Duffy</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Advertising" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="advertising" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="alexander commercials" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="brand strategy" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="embrace life" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="marketing" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="traffic safety" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.brandrants.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Negative can be funny. Negative can be edgy. But if you really want to build brand equity with your marketing communication — embrace the positive. </p><p>I think this should be a golden rule for marketers. Having said that I understand that some categories, such as traffic safety, cancer awareness,or pest control seem destined to negativity. These categories often lure unsuspecting creative teams into the negative. They choose to dramatize loss of life and limb with stunning impact like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kYqjTA_VEg" target="_blank" title="uk seat belt spot">this clever spot</a> from the UK. Having worked on a couple of these campaigns in the States, I confess that I too have been lured to the dark side.   </p><p>But no matter how edgy, shocking or memorable the negative campaign may be, I'm always left feeling how much stronger it could have been if the communication had been based on something positive. I leave these assignments feeling that with a little more creative oomph, a positive angle could have been found. This spot, called Embrace Life, shows us how.</p><p>Embrace Life from <a href="http://www.alexandercommercials.co.uk/" target="_blank" title="alexander commercials">Alexander Commercials</a> shows us that with enough creativity even a subject matter as horrific as dying in a car crash can be communicated with a positive angle. This is an exceptional spot. </p><p /><p align="center" class="asset asset-video" style="margin: 0pt auto; display: block;"><object height="306" width="500"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/h-8PBx7isoM&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="306" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/h-8PBx7isoM&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" /></object></p><br />

<p>So next time your agency or creative team comes to you with a negative campaign concept, think of this spot. You're brand will be better for it. Thanks to <a href="http://twitter.com/Szahun" target="_blank" title="todd">Todd Szahun</a> for sending this to me. </p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~4/68oANKE-Yfg" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brandrants.com/2010/03/embrace-life-the-marketing-power-of-positive.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Death by Power Point</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~3/fSvELStbrUo/death-by-power-point.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/2010/03/death-by-power-point.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2010-03-04T09:19:08+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55168107b883301310f55de66970c</id>
        <published>2010-03-03T13:15:00+01:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-03T13:15:00+01:00</updated>
        <summary>Pontus, one of the students who presented, asked if there was a website or book he could read to sharpen his presentation skills even further. None came to mind, then I remembered this gem.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean Duffy</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Lectures &amp; Workshops" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Alexei Kapterev" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="powerpoint" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="PPT" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="presentation" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="presentation skills" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="public speaking" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.brandrants.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Recently I was asked to judge a series of presentations made by a group of masters students. The exercise was based on a live project we are working on at <a href="http://www.theduffyagency.com" target="_blank" title="The Duffy Agency">The Duffy Agency</a>. They were presenting their marketing plans for a beverage we will be launching in the Spring.  After the presentation Pontus, one of the students who presented, asked if there was a website or book he could read to sharpen his presentation skills even further. None came to mind, then I remembered this gem. It was sent to me by a client a few years back. She swears it was not intended as a not-so-subtle hint. But she did e-mail it to me WHILE I was presenting to her management team. In any event its funny and offers some good practical advice. If you know of any other resources that might help Pontus, please comment. </p><p><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a8ef1072970b-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Death by PPT" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330120a8ef1072970b " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a8ef1072970b-320wi" style="width: 454px; height: 341px;" /></a> </p><p>Thanks to Pontus for the question and to Alexei Kapterev for the answer. Download <a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/files/death-by-powerpoint.pdf" style="color: blue !important; text-decoration: underline !important; cursor: text !important; " target="_blank" title="Death by Power Point">Download Death-by-powerpoint</a> in PDF format. </p><p /><p /><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~4/fSvELStbrUo" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brandrants.com/2010/03/death-by-power-point.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>The Superbowl’s biggest winners were also its biggest losers</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~3/zAP-Ds40qWs/the-super-bowls-biggest-winners-were-also-its-biggest-losers.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/2010/02/the-super-bowls-biggest-winners-were-also-its-biggest-losers.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55168107b88330120a88bd998970b</id>
        <published>2010-02-11T09:11:31+01:00</published>
        <updated>2010-02-11T22:58:52+01:00</updated>
        <summary>With 106.5 million people watching the Superbowl, brands spend millions on advertising. Most companies squandered the chance to drive more eyes to their brand online. Those that did a drive to web campaign were the real Superbowl ad winners.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean Duffy</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Ad Industry" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Advertising" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Brand Equity" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Marketing Tactics" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="advertising" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="alexa" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="betty white" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="dockers" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="doritos" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="dr. pepper" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="drive to web" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="homeaway" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="kiss" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="site ranking" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="snickers" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="super bowl" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="volkswagen" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.brandrants.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><script src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js" type="text/javascript" />
<br />

<p><em><span style="font-size: 15px;">Why drive-to-web works</span></em></p>

<p><em><span style="font-size: 15px;"><span style="font-style: normal; line-height: 15px; font-size: small;">The winner of the populist vote in this year’s Super Bowl ad war is the Betty White Snickers commercial. According to the 2010 USA Today <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/admeter/2010admeter.htm" target="_blank" title="2010 USA Today Ad Meter">Ad Meter</a>, the commercial received an 8.68/10 score. It was also the most talked about commercial the day after the Super Bowl.  </span></span></em></p>

<p><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a88bbda7970b-popup" onclick="window.open(this.href,'_blank','scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="Betty White Sinckers" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330120a88bbda7970b " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a88bbda7970b-320wi" style="margin: 0pt 5px 5px 0pt; width: 260px; height: 186px;" title="Betty White Sinckers" /></a> </p>

<p>Do you think all that buzz was about fluffy nougat enveloped in gooey caramel and rich milk chocolate? No. Do you suppose they vote based on how many candy bars the spot would sell or how much brand equity it generated? Not likely. The buzz was about Betty and Abe. The votes were positive reinforcement delivered to the powers that be for not boring the pants off us with some P&amp;G-inspired cliché. </p>

<p />

<p>If you want to see the spot that will mostly likely generate the biggest business benefit, you’ll have to go all the way to the bottom of the Ad Meter ranking. There you will find the somewhat disjointed  “Wear the Pants” spot from Dockers. Out of the 63 commercials ranked, it placed number 59 and was one of the least talked about. </p>

<p><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330128778e73df970c-popup" onclick="window.open(this.href,'_blank','scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" style="float: right;"><img alt="Picture 6" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330128778e73df970c " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330128778e73df970c-320wi" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 5px 5px; width: 260px; height: 153px;" title="Picture 6" /></a></p>

<p>But if you compare website traffic from the Super Bowl ads you see another story:  <a href="http://www.dockers.com" target="_blank" title="Dockers">Dockers</a> received an amazing 5010% increase in site traffic compared to <a href="http://www.snickers.com" target="_blank" title="Snickers super bowl">Snickers.com</a>, which received almost no noticeable boost in site traffic.  I’m sure the words “free pants people”  uttered during a recession didn’t hurt Docker’s traffic. </p>

<p />

<p>With 106.5 million people watching, the Superbowl has become the de facto launch pad for major campaigns in the US. Advertisers spend millions on commercial production and website design to dress-up their brands for the event. And with CBS charging $3.01 million per 30 second spot, it’s smart to get the most for your money.  Which I feel is where most Superbowl advertisers this year fumbled. </p>

<p />

<p>Out of the 60+ commercials that aired during the Super Bowl, most companies squander the chance to drive more eyes to their brand online. That would have provided the opportunity for advertisers to build relations with viewers during the off-season and perhaps convert them to brand fans by the time Superbowl XLV rolls around.  </p>

<p />

<p>And just to be clear, a URL super at the end of a spot is not drive-to-web (at least not in my book). A drive-to-web spot does just that: It provides a compelling reason to go to the website — like free pants. Of course the key to getting business out of any of this is having something of value online that will engage visitors in a relevant manner and encourage repeat visits. That in itself can be a lot more difficult than entertaining a football fan for 30 seconds.</p>

<p />

<p>But forget drive-to-web, you would think most of the spots aired last Sunday were produced in the 1980’s.  Hardly any even bothered to featured a URL. Or if they did, it was so small that it begged to be overlooked. Watch the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDcWRUtrVuc" target="_blank" title="volkswagen super bowl">Volkswagen</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtDWKusYZgM" target="_blank" title="honda crosstour super bowl">Honda Crosstour</a> spots and you’ll see what I mean. The URL is there, but it’s tiny. It took me a couple of viewings to even notice it.</p>

<p />

<p>Comparing Ad Meter’s two highest rated commercials, Snickers and <a href="http://www.doritos.com" target="_blank" title="www.doritos.com">Doritos</a>, to the far less popular <a href="http://homeaway.com" target="_blank" title="Home Away super bowl">HomeAway.com</a> and Dockers spots, there is a profound difference in post-game site traffic.  According to Alexa rankings of daily page views site traffic for Snickers and Doritos remained flat leading up to the game and received little additional traffic during and after the game. </p>

<p><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a88bc0b4970b-popup" onclick="window.open(this.href,'_blank','scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img alt="Snickers" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330120a88bc0b4970b " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a88bc0b4970b-320pi" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; display: block;" title="Snickers" /></a> </p>

<p><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a88bc13a970b-popup" onclick="window.open(this.href,'_blank','scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img alt="Doritos" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330120a88bc13a970b " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a88bc13a970b-320pi" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; display: block;" title="Doritos" /></a></p>

<p />

<p>Compare that with the skyrocketing site traffic of Homeaway.com and Dockers. That’s because despite their low appeal, the two spots managed to entice viewers online. </p>

<p><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330128778e775a970c-popup" onclick="window.open(this.href,'_blank','scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img alt="Homeaway" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330128778e775a970c " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330128778e775a970c-320pi" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; display: block;" title="Homeaway" /></a> <br /><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330128778e778d970c-popup" onclick="window.open(this.href,'_blank','scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img alt="Dockers" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330128778e778d970c " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330128778e778d970c-320pi" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; display: block;" title="Dockers" /></a></p>

<p />

<p>According to a July 2009 report by ICOM, the effectiveness of broadcast TV at driving consumers to the web is 17.8%. During the Super Bowl, that translated to a potential 19 million people looking at an advertiser’s website from just one ad. By using an obvious drive-to-web message, companies could have continued the fun online and built even more brand equity, loyalty and engagement in ways that TV simply can’t. For the most part, that opportunity was lost. </p>

<p />

<p>Doritos didn’t even encourage people to see all the <a href="http://Crashthesuperbowl.com" target="_blank" title="Crash the super bowl doritos">Crashthesuperbowl.com</a> spots, which featured more fan created content on their site. </p>

<p />

<p>VW had a small link to their <a href="http://www.vw.com/punchdub/" target="_blank" title="punchdub vw super bowl">Punch Dub url</a> that is hidden under their big VW logo. </p>

<p />

<p>Where was Dr. Pepper’s drive to record your own version of <a href="http://www.drpepper.com/" target="_blank" title="dr. pepper kiss super bowl">Dr. Love</a> to join the never ending song? They paid for the KISS song, and that’s not cheap. </p>

<p />

<p><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a88d8fe8970b-popup" onclick="window.open(this.href,'_blank','scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="Diva" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330120a88d8fe8970b " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a88d8fe8970b-320wi" style="margin: 0pt 5px 5px 0pt; width: 260px; height: 144px;" title="Diva" /></a> Sure, men marching across a field in their jockey shorts lacks the entertainment value of seeing Betty White tackled face down in the mud. But Snickers missed a chance to send people to their site to see the other <a href="http://www.snickers.com/ads/superbowl.html" target="_blank" title="snickers aretha franklin liza minelli">Aretha Franklin/Liza Minelli</a> spot and perhaps provide some value to candy-lovers that would keep them buzzing and returning to the site during the off-season.  </p>

<p />

<p>Today brands are spending millions to create original content for both TV and the web, often times under the same campaign theme.  But in many cases, viewers would never know it. In today’s economy every dollar counts more than ever. That’s why I believe most, if not all, spots should incorporate some form of drive-to-web messaging coupled with a web concept that makes it worth the trip. And that required planning web activities in from the start both strategically and creatively. </p>

<p />

<p>Brand managers need to break down silos between traditional medias, new media and PR to get all of their promotional efforts working in unison and delivering more return from their marketing spend. Spots that do that will get my vote at next year’s Superbowl (unless the Patriots make it, then I’ll be too wrapped up in the game to care about the spots). </p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~4/zAP-Ds40qWs" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brandrants.com/2010/02/the-super-bowls-biggest-winners-were-also-its-biggest-losers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>What next: 2010 Youth Trends Report</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~3/X3t4qgqvohg/what-next-2010-youth-trends-report.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/2010/01/what-next-2010-youth-trends-report.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2010-01-26T16:52:32+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55168107b88330120a8109b21970b</id>
        <published>2010-01-26T13:30:00+01:00</published>
        <updated>2010-01-26T13:52:14+01:00</updated>
        <summary>"The future is here... It's just not evenly distributed." This quote from William Gibson is a fit opening to Graham Brown's 2010 Youth Trends report. If you are marketing to this segment then I think you will find these three presentations of value. But even if your marketing is not youth-oriented, I would encourage you to take a look. </summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean Duffy</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Marketing Strategy" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Trend" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="2010 youth report" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Marketing trends" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="William Gibson" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="youth trends" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.brandrants.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p />

<p />

<p />

<p>"The future is here... It's just not evenly distributed." This quote from William Gibson is a fitting opening to<a href="http://www.grahamdbrown.com/" target="_blank" title="Brown"> Graham Brown's</a> 2010 Youth Trends report. If you are marketing to this segment then I think you will find these three presentations of value. But even if your marketing is not youth-oriented, I would encourage you to take a look. </p><p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">This report is about youth, but it's just as much about what's next with regard to mainstream marketing. Concepts such as Co-Shopping, Earned Media, Peer-to-Peer and the overall shift to mobile platforms are not concepts that are exclusive to kids. It's just that they are the first to exploit them and explore their potential. Any business could profit from these insights. </span><br /></strong></p>

<p /><p id="__ss_2892640" style="width: 425px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mobileyouth/2010-youth-trends-report-part1" style="margin: 12px 0pt 3px; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; display: block; text-decoration: underline;" title="2010 Youth Trends Report Part1">2010 Youth Trends Report Part1</a><object height="355" style="margin: 0px;" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=2010-trends-final-part1-100112011828-phpapp02&amp;stripped_title=2010-youth-trends-report-part1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=2010-trends-final-part1-100112011828-phpapp02&amp;stripped_title=2010-youth-trends-report-part1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" /></object></p><p id="__ss_2910721" style="width: 425px; text-align: left;">

<p><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mobileyouth/2010-youth-trends-report-part-2" style="margin: 12px 0pt 3px; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; display: block; text-decoration: underline;" title="2010 Youth Trends Report Part 2">2010 Youth Trends Report Part 2</a><object height="355" style="margin: 0px;" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=2010-trends-final-part2-100114015110-phpapp02&amp;stripped_title=2010-youth-trends-report-part-2" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=2010-trends-final-part2-100114015110-phpapp02&amp;stripped_title=2010-youth-trends-report-part-2" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" /></object></p></p><p id="__ss_2946442" style="width: 425px; text-align: left;"><p><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mobileyouth/2010-youth-trends-report-part3-final" style="margin: 12px 0pt 3px; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; display: block; text-decoration: underline;" title="2010 Youth Trends Report Part3 - FINAL">2010 Youth Trends Report Part3</a><object height="355" style="margin: 0px;" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=2010-trends-final-part3-100119024654-phpapp02&amp;stripped_title=2010-youth-trends-report-part3-final" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=2010-trends-final-part3-100119024654-phpapp02&amp;stripped_title=2010-youth-trends-report-part3-final" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" /></object></p><p style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px; padding-top: 2px;"><br /></p></p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~4/X3t4qgqvohg" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brandrants.com/2010/01/what-next-2010-youth-trends-report.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Social Media ROI vs RODN </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~3/WWJ08tkLJTE/social-media-roi-vs-rodn-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/2010/01/social-media-roi-vs-rodn-.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2010-01-26T13:12:50+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55168107b8833012876fd2766970c</id>
        <published>2010-01-22T13:21:36+01:00</published>
        <updated>2010-01-22T13:21:36+01:00</updated>
        <summary>Has anyone ever asked you to demonstrate the ROI of a $1M TV spot or $25K brochure? Me neither. But suggest to a marketing executive today that they spend a few thousand on a social initiative and they won't budge — unless you can prove ROI beforehand.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean Duffy</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="ROI" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Social Media" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="erik qualman" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="marketing" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="ROI" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social media" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="socialnomics" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="the duffy agency" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.brandrants.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Has anyone ever asked you to demonstrate the ROI of a $1M TV spot or $25K brochure? Me neither. But suggest to a marketing executive today that they spend a few thousand on a social media initiative and they won't budge — unless you can prove ROI beforehand. And it's not the recession that's to blame. These are the same marketers who still invest in traditional media without any more ROI data than "that's the way we've always done it." </p>

<p>That is one reason why I find <a href="http://socialnomics.net/" target="_blank" title="qualman">Erik Qualman</a>'s attempt to explain the convoluted world of social media ROI more useful than most. Like his <a href="http://www.brandrants.com/2009/08/socialnomics.html" target="_blank" title="socialnomics">previous social media video</a>, this one excels at providing perspective. For instance, it reminds us that only 18% of TV spots actually generate positive ROI (and they are probably infomercials). The author of Socialnomics, Qualman also raises the second-most important question in the ROI debate: "<em>Why are we trying to measure social media like a traditional channel anyway? Social media touches every facet of business and is more an extension of good business ethics</em>." While I think categorizing social media as "an extension of good business ethics" underplays the real financial benefits it can yield, his point is well taken. </p>

<p>Connecting almost any marketing investment to the bottom line is a tricky business. However, social media provides us with more data to support its efficacy in terms of precursors to sales like reach, frequency, response/interaction, awareness and positive perception than tradition media has ever done. And feedback is in real time allowing us to make course corrections to improve and increase results as we go. </p>

<p>What's more, we can also document the growing number of business and private consumers who are engaging with social media each day. Which brings us to THE most important point in the ROI debate: What is the return on doing nothing?  </p><p align="center" class="asset asset-video" style="margin: 0pt auto; display: block;"><object height="306" width="450"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ypmfs3z8esI&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="306" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ypmfs3z8esI&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" /></object></p>

<br />



<p />

<p /><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~4/WWJ08tkLJTE" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brandrants.com/2010/01/social-media-roi-vs-rodn-.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Kudos for Methodical Madness and a request for your vote</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~3/rfeiSJfDDJ0/kudos-for-methodical-madness.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/2010/01/kudos-for-methodical-madness.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55168107b8833012876f5de47970c</id>
        <published>2010-01-20T17:57:48+01:00</published>
        <updated>2010-01-20T17:57:48+01:00</updated>
        <summary>It's been a good start to the new year for The Duffy Agency's other blog Methodical Madness. Check it out and if you like it, please vote for us on Fuel Line's Ad Agency Blog of the Year. </summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean Duffy</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Agency News" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="ad agency" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="blog" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="blog of the year" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="blogging" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="fuel lines" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="methodical madness" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social media" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social media examiner" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.brandrants.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>It's been a good start to the new year for The Duffy Agency's other blog <a href="http://blog.theduffyagency.com/" target="_blank" title="methodical madness">Methodical Madness</a>. <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/finalists-top-10-social-media-blogs-2010/" target="_blank" title="social media examiner">Social Media Examiner </a>has short-listed the blog along with 20 others for the distinction of the world's Top 10 Social Media Blogs. Our fellow finalists include a roster of stellar blogs like  <a href="http://chrisbrogan.com/" target="_blank">Chris Brogan</a>, <a href="http://www.copyblogger.com" target="_blank">CopyBlogger</a>, <a href="http://mashable.com/" target="_blank">Mashable</a> , and <a href="http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com" target="_blank">Social Media Explorer</a> . Winners to be decided soon by jury. </p><p>Methodical Madness is also short-listed with 12 other finalists on <a href="http://twtpoll.com/y77kg1" target="_blank" title="fuel lines">Fuel Line's Ad Agency Blog of the Year</a>. If you haven't read Methodical Madness, give it a <a href="http://blog.theduffyagency.com/" target="_blank" title="duffy blog">look</a>. And if you like what you see please <a href="http://twtpoll.com/y77kg1" target="_blank" title="vote">VOTE</a> before <strong>Friday, January 22</strong>. Below you can see the Fuel Lines poll results live.   </p>

<p /><span style="font-size: 15px;"><a href="http://twtpoll.com/y77kg1" target="_blank" title="vote here">CLICK HERE</a> to VOTE for The Duffy Agency</span>

<script src="http://twtpoll.com/js/badge.js" type="text/javascript" />
<script src="http://twtpoll.com/badge/?twt=y77kg1&amp;r=1&amp;s=250&amp;b=1" type="text/javascript" /><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~4/rfeiSJfDDJ0" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brandrants.com/2010/01/kudos-for-methodical-madness.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Old dogs &amp; new tricks: Saatchi and the Yaris social media debackle</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~3/X92XIEoNb_8/saatchi-and-the-yaris-social-media-debackle.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/2010/01/saatchi-and-the-yaris-social-media-debackle.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55168107b88330120a7cf0b3d970b</id>
        <published>2010-01-14T14:30:00+01:00</published>
        <updated>2010-01-14T14:30:00+01:00</updated>
        <summary>Four years into the social media surge, I'm still not convinced that many of the large agency networks get it. Recent case in point, the failed Toyota Yaris campaign by Saatchi &amp; Saatchi. </summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean Duffy</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Ad Industry" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Saatchi &amp; Saatchi" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Social Media" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Toyota" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="advertising" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Australia" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="fail" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Saatchi &amp; Saatchi" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social media" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Toyota Yaris" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.brandrants.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Four years into the social media surge and I'm still not convinced that many of the large agency networks get it. The same way they didn't get branding in the late 80's, or the internet in the early 90's. The large agency chains that populate conglomerates like Omnicom, WPP and Interpublic seem stuck one evolutionary step away from their origins as media brokers. It's been 100 years since 
James Walter Thompson retrofitted a creative department to his media brokerage. Since that brave step, agencies have never demonstrated any capacity to evolve further. If they can't see 15% commission in it, they're not interested.  </p><p><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a7cee843970b-popup" onclick="window.open(this.href,'_blank','scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" style="float: right;"><img alt="Yaris logo" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330120a7cee843970b " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330120a7cee843970b-320wi" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 5px 5px; width: 104px; height: 104px;" title="Yaris logo" /></a> Today, media commissions are usually half that and the media landscape has been turned upside-down and inside-out: Yet the agency groups at the top of our industry's food chain seem determined not to adapt. Yes they are "using" social media, but they tend to use it as fodder to push through their traditional media channels. Like buying a Model T Ford in 1908 and then hitching horse to it and using it as a buggy. The example of the Yaris social media debacle in Australia is the latest case in point. </p><p>Long story short, Saatchi created a rather lame film competition to launch Yaris without having bothered to build a community first. As one might expect, no one cared. Saatchi panicked and brought in a ringer to make a film that not only "won" the competition under dubious circumstances but also wound up being so offensive and off-brand that it triggered a major wave of negative publicity. I first learned about it when my TAAN colleague John MCCallum posted this video on his agency's <a href="http://www.levymccallum.co.uk/blog/" target="_blank" title="Captain's Blog">blog</a>. </p><p align="center" class="asset asset-video" style="margin: 0pt auto; display: block;"><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gs6BjHcPfoI&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gs6BjHcPfoI&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" /></object></p><br /><p>For the full story on what happened behind the scenes, read Tim Burrowes excellent post on mUmBRELLA titled <a href="http://mumbrella.com.au/how-saatchi-saatchis-toyota-social-media-disaster-unfolded-14257" target="_blank" title="mumbrella">How Saatchi &amp; Saatchi’s Toyota social media disaster unfolded</a>. It is a case study in how NOT to approach social media. It should be required reading for any marketer entering the social media arena with a major brand. </p><p>The fallout from these types of misadventures is that clients become even more skeptical of social media. One client cited this case to me as support that social media just doesn't work for certain brands. I disagree. As Tim Burrowes concluded "In the end, it wasn’t social media that created this disaster for the brand – it was the lack of social media savvy."</p><p>So why are great agencies like Saatchi making such spectacular flops? I think a big part of it is they are treating social media like traditional media and missing out entirely on community building which is the real force behind social media. They will never make 15% media commission building a community, and that I believe will keep social media from being taken seriously by many large franchise agency chains for years to come. </p><p>Yaris has learned that using social media to push a message out to the market is a risky and costly endeavor. Whether Saatchi will learn that lesson is yet to be seen. In the mean time it will remain up to those independent ad agencies who are well vested in social media to take up the slack. Glad to be of service. </p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~4/X92XIEoNb_8" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brandrants.com/2010/01/saatchi-and-the-yaris-social-media-debackle.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>An anthropological introduction to YouTube</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~3/WdAP-jf7U1I/an-anthropological-introduction-to-youtube.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/2009/12/an-anthropological-introduction-to-youtube.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55168107b88330128765f43e0970c</id>
        <published>2009-12-17T14:37:03+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-17T15:02:32+01:00</updated>
        <summary>I'm not embarrassed to admit I needed a dictionary to figure out that it means a branch of anthropology dealing with the scientific description of specific individual cultures. He is interested in how digital media is impacting this.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean Duffy</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Social Media" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="You Tube" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="An anthropological introduction to YouTube" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Digital Ethnography" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Dr. Michael Weschgave" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Marketing" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Social Media" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="You Tube" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.brandrants.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This is a video of a speech Dr. Michael Weschgave gave to the library of congress. As you will see, Dr. Weschgave is a delightful speaker and a lot more down-to-earth than the name given to his area of specialty at Kansas State University: digital ethnography. I'm not embarrassed to admit I needed a dictionary to figure out that it means a branch of anthropology dealing with the scientific description of specific individual cultures. He is interested in how digital media is impacting this. Academic? Yes. But also very interesting and applicable to anyone working with (and striving to understand) social media and its impact on markets. You can also find Dr. Weschgave's blog <a href="http://mediatedcultures.net/ksudigg/" style="font-family: yui-tmp;" target="_blank">Digital Ethnography</a> here. </p><p>Be warned: The video is almost an hour long. But I found it was worth it. It offers a new perspective on You Tube (and social media in general) with lots of insights and examples.I'd be interested in hearing if any other marketers find this info useful. </p><p align="center" class="asset asset-video" style="margin: 0pt auto; display: block;"><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TPAO-lZ4_hU&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TPAO-lZ4_hU&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" /></object></p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~4/WdAP-jf7U1I" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brandrants.com/2009/12/an-anthropological-introduction-to-youtube.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Social Media: Giving entrepreneurs a new edge</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~3/q9OLRrMd69Y/social-media-giving-entrepreneurs-a-new-edge.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/2009/12/social-media-giving-entrepreneurs-a-new-edge.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55168107b88330120a75c155a970b</id>
        <published>2009-12-17T14:01:55+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-17T14:31:47+01:00</updated>
        <summary>Entrepreneurs may have the most to gain by harnessing the power of social media. </summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean Duffy</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Social Media" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Entrepreneurs" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Lund University" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Lund University School of Economics and Management" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Marketing" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Social Media" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.brandrants.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I never knew you could study to become an entrepreneur. I was enlightened when I received a call from the School of Economics and Management at Lund University in Sweden. They asked if I felt social media had any relevance for their Master Program in Entrepreneurship. It got me thinking and,of course, social media is relevant for them. So we arranged a lecture to see what the students thought.</p><p> </p><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;" /><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330128765f3b2d970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="Screen shot 2009-12-17 at 2.19.33 PM" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330128765f3b2d970c " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330128765f3b2d970c-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; width: 261px; height: 197px;" /></a> The experience left me with the impression that entrepreneurs may have the most to gain by harnessing the power of social media. The reason is that most entrepreneurs I know share a few traits in common: a) they are highly motivated to succeed, b) risk tolerant, c) open to new ideas, d) usually operating on sweat equity and a shoe-string budget, e) extremely knowledgeable about their subject matter, f) hands-on and g) yearning to engage and learn about their market. I wish all marketing professionals shared this profile. </p><p>I want to thank Marie Löwegren, Dr. Tomas Karlsson, and Stina Johannesson from Lund University for the invitation to speak and helping with arrangements. If you were in the class, you can download the slides here: <a href="http://www.hidelinks.com/?07x0i184ge" target="_blank" title="download">10 ways for entrepreneurs to win in the new economy</a>. Please use the password that was emailed to you or contact Stina to get it. </p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~4/q9OLRrMd69Y" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brandrants.com/2009/12/social-media-giving-entrepreneurs-a-new-edge.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Congrats to Methodical Madness blog</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~3/PvN5EJ_CX5A/congrats-to-methodical-madness-blog.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.brandrants.com/2009/12/congrats-to-methodical-madness-blog.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55168107b88330128762fb508970c</id>
        <published>2009-12-08T11:32:23+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-08T11:32:23+01:00</updated>
        <summary>We have two blogs at The Duffy Agency: Brand Rants and Methodical Madness. The latter has just been voted #1 among 58 ad agency blogs globally according to a poll run by Michael Gass. </summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean Duffy</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Agency News" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="ad agency blogs" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="blog awards" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="fuel lines" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="methodical madness" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="michael gass" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="the duffy agency" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.brandrants.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We have two blogs at The Duffy Agency: Brand Rants and <a href="http://theduffyagency.typepad.com/" target="_blank" title="Methodical Madness">Methodical Madness</a>. The latter has just been voted #1 among 58 ad agency blogs globally according to a <a href="http://fuelingnewbusiness.com/2009/12/06/swedish-ad-agency-blog-of-the-month-for-november/" target="_blank" title="Gass Poll">poll</a> run by <a href="http://twitter.com/michaelgass" target="_blank" title="Gass Twitter">Michael Gass</a>. Many thanks to Michael running the poll and for his blog <a href="httphttp://fuelingnewbusiness.com/://" target="_blank" title="Fuel Lines">Fuel Lines</a> which offers very useful advice to ad agencies. </p><p><a href="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330128762fb1c2970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Fuel Lines Poll - The Duffy Agency" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e55168107b88330128762fb1c2970c " src="http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b88330128762fb1c2970c-320wi" style="width: 472px; height: 334px;" /></a> <br /> </p><p /><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/brandrants/QXkf/~4/PvN5EJ_CX5A" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brandrants.com/2009/12/congrats-to-methodical-madness-blog.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:dynamic-ssi -->
